Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112959
Emma Grundtvig Gram, Helen Macdonald, Barnett Kramer, Steven Woloshin
{"title":"Call to improve transparent communication in direct-to-consumer test marketing.","authors":"Emma Grundtvig Gram, Helen Macdonald, Barnett Kramer, Steven Woloshin","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112959","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112959","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"213-214"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141466068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112726
Sarah Gebauer, Carly Eckert
{"title":"Survey of US physicians' attitudes and knowledge of AI.","authors":"Sarah Gebauer, Carly Eckert","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112726","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112726","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"279-281"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139734441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-22DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112899
Adrienne Stevens, Mona Hersi, Chantelle Garritty, Lisa Hartling, Beverley J Shea, Lesley A Stewart, Vivian Andrea Welch, Andrea C Tricco
Rapid reviews (RRs) are produced using abbreviated methods compared with standard systematic reviews (SR) to expedite the process for decision-making. This paper provides interim guidance to support the complete reporting of RRs. Recommendations emerged from a survey informed by empirical studies of RR reporting, in addition to collective experience. RR producers should use existing, robustly developed reporting guidelines as the foundation for writing RRs: notably Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020; reporting for SRs), but also preferred reporting items for overviews of reviews (PRIOR) items (reporting for overviews of SRs) where SRs are included in the RR. In addition, a minimum set of six items were identified for RRs: three items pertaining to methods and three addressing publication ethics. Authors should be reporting what a priori-defined iterative methods were used during conduct, what distinguishes their RR from an SR, and knowledge user (eg, policymaker) involvement in the process. Explicitly reporting deviations from standard SR methods, including omitted steps, is important. The inclusion of publication ethics items reflects the predominance of non-journal published RRs: reporting an authorship byline and corresponding author, acknowledging other contributors, and reporting the use of expert peer review. As various formats may be used when packaging and presenting information to decision-makers, it is practical to think of complete reporting as across a set of explicitly linked documents made available in an open-access journal or repository that is barrier-free. We encourage feedback from the RR community of the use of these items as we look to develop a consolidated list in the development of PRISMA-RR.
与标准系统综述（SR）相比，快速综述（RR）采用简略的方法编写，以加快决策过程。本文提供了支持完整报告 RR 的临时指南。这些建议是在对 RR 报告的实证研究以及集体经验进行调查后提出的。RR制作者应使用现有的、完善的报告指南作为撰写RR的基础：特别是《2020年系统综述和Meta分析的首选报告项目》（PRISMA 2020；SR报告），如果RR中包含SR，还应使用《综述的首选报告项目》（PRIOR）项目（SR综述报告）。此外，还为RR确定了至少六项内容：三项与方法有关，三项涉及出版伦理。作者应报告在研究过程中使用了哪些先验定义的迭代方法、RR 与 SR 的区别以及知识使用者（如决策者）在研究过程中的参与情况。明确报告偏离标准 SR 方法的情况（包括省略的步骤）非常重要。纳入出版伦理项目反映了非期刊发表的RR占主导地位：报告作者署名和通讯作者，承认其他贡献者，报告使用专家同行评审。由于在包装和向决策者展示信息时可能会使用各种格式，因此，将完整报告视为在无障碍的开放获取期刊或资料库中提供的一套明确链接的文件是切实可行的。我们鼓励 RR 社区就这些项目的使用提供反馈意见，因为我们希望在开发 PRISMA-RR 的过程中制定一份综合清单。
{"title":"Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews.","authors":"Adrienne Stevens, Mona Hersi, Chantelle Garritty, Lisa Hartling, Beverley J Shea, Lesley A Stewart, Vivian Andrea Welch, Andrea C Tricco","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112899","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid reviews (RRs) are produced using abbreviated methods compared with standard systematic reviews (SR) to expedite the process for decision-making. This paper provides interim guidance to support the complete reporting of RRs. Recommendations emerged from a survey informed by empirical studies of RR reporting, in addition to collective experience. RR producers should use existing, robustly developed reporting guidelines as the foundation for writing RRs: notably Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020; reporting for SRs), but also preferred reporting items for overviews of reviews (PRIOR) items (reporting for overviews of SRs) where SRs are included in the RR. In addition, a minimum set of six items were identified for RRs: three items pertaining to methods and three addressing publication ethics. Authors should be reporting what a priori-defined iterative methods were used during conduct, what distinguishes their RR from an SR, and knowledge user (eg, policymaker) involvement in the process. Explicitly reporting deviations from standard SR methods, including omitted steps, is important. The inclusion of publication ethics items reflects the predominance of non-journal published RRs: reporting an authorship byline and corresponding author, acknowledging other contributors, and reporting the use of expert peer review. As various formats may be used when packaging and presenting information to decision-makers, it is practical to think of complete reporting as across a set of explicitly linked documents made available in an open-access journal or repository that is barrier-free. We encourage feedback from the RR community of the use of these items as we look to develop a consolidated list in the development of PRISMA-RR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141747432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-04DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112948
Elmer V Bernstam, Alejandro Araya, Matthew Decaro, Todd R Johnson
{"title":"Informatics hygiene to support reuse of routinely collected health care data for evidence-based practice.","authors":"Elmer V Bernstam, Alejandro Araya, Matthew Decaro, Todd R Johnson","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112948","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112948","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698945/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141533562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-24DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112727
Fei Wang, Ashley Beecy
{"title":"Implementing AI models in clinical workflows: a roadmap.","authors":"Fei Wang, Ashley Beecy","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112727","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112727","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666800/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141445397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-05DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112907
Zijun Wang, Jako S Burgers, Ruitai Shao, Zhaoxiang Bian, Chen Wang, Yaolong Chen, Janne Estill
{"title":"Strengthening transparency in randomised trials related to multimorbidity: key points and recommendations to guide reporting.","authors":"Zijun Wang, Jako S Burgers, Ruitai Shao, Zhaoxiang Bian, Chen Wang, Yaolong Chen, Janne Estill","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112907","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141260799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112270
Christopher Moriates, William K Silverstein, Renato Bandeira de Mello, Lorette Stammen, Brian M Wong
{"title":"High-value care education can learn from the evidence-based medicine movement: moving beyond competencies and curricula to culture.","authors":"Christopher Moriates, William K Silverstein, Renato Bandeira de Mello, Lorette Stammen, Brian M Wong","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112270","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112270","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"147-150"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9850866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620
Andrew Booth, Isolde Sommer, Jane Noyes, Catherine Houghton, Fiona Campbell
This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. This guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of qualitative research. 'Rapid' or 'resource-constrained' QES require use of templates and targeted knowledge user involvement. Clear definition of perspectives and decisions on indirect evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting eligibility criteria. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. Thematic and framework synthesis facilitate efficient synthesis of large numbers of studies or plentiful data. Finally, judicious use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help to achieve a timely and useful review product.
{"title":"Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Andrew Booth, Isolde Sommer, Jane Noyes, Catherine Houghton, Fiona Campbell","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. This guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of qualitative research. 'Rapid' or 'resource-constrained' QES require use of templates and targeted knowledge user involvement. Clear definition of perspectives and decisions on indirect evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting eligibility criteria. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. Thematic and framework synthesis facilitate efficient synthesis of large numbers of studies or plentiful data. Finally, judicious use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help to achieve a timely and useful review product.</p>","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11137447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139734440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号