Pub Date : 2025-01-29DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001
Karen Caeyenberghs, Mervyn Singh, Annalee L Cobden, Elizabeth G Ellis, Liam G Graeme, Priscilla Gates, Alex Burmester, Jade Guarnera, Jake Burnett, Evelyn M Deutscher, Lyndon Firman-Sadler, Bec Joyce, Jacqueline P Notarianni, Christian Pardo de Figueroa Flores, Juan F Domínguez D
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized our capacity to examine brain alterations in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known about the level of implementation of MRI techniques in clinical practice in TBI and associated obstacles.
Methods: A diverse set of health professionals completed 19 multiple choice and free text survey questions.
Results: Of the 81 respondents, 73.4% reported that they acquire/order MRI scans in TBI patients, and 66% indicated they would prefer MRI be more often used with this cohort. The greatest impediment for MRI usage was scanner availability (57.1%). Less than half of respondents (42.1%) indicated that they perform advanced MRI analysis. Factors such as dedicated experts within the team (44.4%) and user-friendly MRI analysis tools (40.7%), were listed as potentially helpful to implement advanced MRI analyses in clinical practice.
Conclusion: Results suggest a wide variability in the purpose, timing, and composition of the scanning protocol of clinical MRI after TBI. Three recommendations are described to broaden implementation of MRI in clinical practice in TBI: 1) development of a standardized multimodal MRI protocol; 2) future directions for the use of advanced MRI analyses; 3) use of low-field MRI to overcome technical/practical issues with high-field MRI.
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury: a survey of clinical practitioners' experiences and views on current practice and obstacles.","authors":"Karen Caeyenberghs, Mervyn Singh, Annalee L Cobden, Elizabeth G Ellis, Liam G Graeme, Priscilla Gates, Alex Burmester, Jade Guarnera, Jake Burnett, Evelyn M Deutscher, Lyndon Firman-Sadler, Bec Joyce, Jacqueline P Notarianni, Christian Pardo de Figueroa Flores, Juan F Domínguez D","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized our capacity to examine brain alterations in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known about the level of implementation of MRI techniques in clinical practice in TBI and associated obstacles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diverse set of health professionals completed 19 multiple choice and free text survey questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 respondents, 73.4% reported that they acquire/order MRI scans in TBI patients, and 66% indicated they would prefer MRI be more often used with this cohort. The greatest impediment for MRI usage was scanner availability (57.1%). Less than half of respondents (42.1%) indicated that they perform advanced MRI analysis. Factors such as dedicated experts within the team (44.4%) and user-friendly MRI analysis tools (40.7%), were listed as potentially helpful to implement advanced MRI analyses in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest a wide variability in the purpose, timing, and composition of the scanning protocol of clinical MRI after TBI. Three recommendations are described to broaden implementation of MRI in clinical practice in TBI: 1) development of a standardized multimodal MRI protocol; 2) future directions for the use of advanced MRI analyses; 3) use of low-field MRI to overcome technical/practical issues with high-field MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143058077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2392251
Jacob E Resch, David X Cifu
The Long-term Impact of Military-relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Military and Tactical Athlete Research Study (LIMBIC MATARS) program established in 2020 is comprised of 22 universities and health systems across the United States. The LIMBIC MATARS Consortium's goal is to increase understanding of the complexities of concussion in collegiate athletes by leveraging extant retrospective and novel prospective data sets through the application of innovative research designs. The manuscripts in this special issue represent findings from clinical data sets based on consensus-derived common data elements collected from the 2015-2016 to 2019-2020 sport seasons that include 1311 cases of collegiate athletes diagnosed with concussion. Using these data, LIMBIC MATARS investigators addressed hypotheses that included (1) factors, including access to athletic trainers, biological sex, and ADHD, that may influence recovery from concussion, (2) predisposing risks associated with reinjury after return-to-sport, such as sport type, and (3) therapeutic targets for intervention including language barriers, physical activity, return-to-learn, and sleep. This commentary introduces the methodology and 10 descriptive studies highlighting initial findings from the Consortium.
{"title":"LIMBIC military and tactical athlete research study: making lemonade 101.","authors":"Jacob E Resch, David X Cifu","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2392251","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2392251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Long-term Impact of Military-relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Military and Tactical Athlete Research Study (LIMBIC MATARS) program established in 2020 is comprised of 22 universities and health systems across the United States. The LIMBIC MATARS Consortium's goal is to increase understanding of the complexities of concussion in collegiate athletes by leveraging extant retrospective and novel prospective data sets through the application of innovative research designs. The manuscripts in this special issue represent findings from clinical data sets based on consensus-derived common data elements collected from the 2015-2016 to 2019-2020 sport seasons that include 1311 cases of collegiate athletes diagnosed with concussion. Using these data, LIMBIC MATARS investigators addressed hypotheses that included (1) factors, including access to athletic trainers, biological sex, and ADHD, that may influence recovery from concussion, (2) predisposing risks associated with reinjury after return-to-sport, such as sport type, and (3) therapeutic targets for intervention including language barriers, physical activity, return-to-learn, and sleep. This commentary introduces the methodology and 10 descriptive studies highlighting initial findings from the Consortium.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"85-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28Epub Date: 2024-10-02DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2408563
Owen M Sheehy, Katherine J Hunzinger, Christine M Baugh, Julie M Stamm
Objectives: Evaluate professional rugby players' self-reported perceived understanding of the head injury assessment (HIA) and return to play (RTP) processes and determine factors related to understanding and trust pertaining to these processes.
Methods: An electronic survey measured concepts of interest. A thematic analysis of player understanding was performed, and player statements were coded.
Results: 207 U.S. Major League Rugby (MLR) players participated (26.7 ± 3.4 years). HIA and RTP protocol understanding was not correlated with concussion history (p = 0.41). International rugby experience and trust regarding MLR support of the following protocols and opposing team medical staff practices varied in their relationship to HIA understanding. Trust that all MLR teams follow the same protocols was positively correlated with all HIA questions (ps < 0.03). No HIA questions were correlated with trust in their own team's medical staff. All trust questions were significantly correlated with RTP process understanding. Qualitative analysis identified four HIA- and RTP-related themes: education needs, staffing needs, HIA criticisms, and importance of player safety.
Conclusion: International playing experience and greater trust in the MLR and league stakeholders were associated with greater player understanding of the HIA and RTP protocols. These results provide insight into the importance of educating players on league-specific concussion protocols.
{"title":"Understanding of head injury assessment and return to play processes and associated factors in United States Major League Rugby players.","authors":"Owen M Sheehy, Katherine J Hunzinger, Christine M Baugh, Julie M Stamm","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2408563","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2408563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate professional rugby players' self-reported perceived understanding of the head injury assessment (HIA) and return to play (RTP) processes and determine factors related to understanding and trust pertaining to these processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey measured concepts of interest. A thematic analysis of player understanding was performed, and player statements were coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>207 U.S. Major League Rugby (MLR) players participated (26.7 ± 3.4 years). HIA and RTP protocol understanding was not correlated with concussion history (<i>p</i> = 0.41). International rugby experience and trust regarding MLR support of the following protocols and opposing team medical staff practices varied in their relationship to HIA understanding. Trust that all MLR teams follow the same protocols was positively correlated with all HIA questions (ps < 0.03). No HIA questions were correlated with trust in their own team's medical staff. All trust questions were significantly correlated with RTP process understanding. Qualitative analysis identified four HIA- and RTP-related themes: education needs, staffing needs, HIA criticisms, and importance of player safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>International playing experience and greater trust in the MLR and league stakeholders were associated with greater player understanding of the HIA and RTP protocols. These results provide insight into the importance of educating players on league-specific concussion protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"99-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28Epub Date: 2024-10-13DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2413639
Rajiv K Singh, Thomas J Humphries, Jeremy F Dawson, Julia Tiupin-Szulc, Suzanne Mason, Fiona E Lecky
Objective: Evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with depression symptoms at 10 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and compare with results at 10 weeks and 1 year.
Methods: A large cohort of prospective admissions with TBI were followed up for 10 years. Depression using HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) score > 8 was measured. Several injury and demographic features were examined for association with depression.
Results: Over 4 years, 1130 individuals were recruited of whom 916 attended at 1 year; after 10 years, 552 attended and 210 had died. 154 (17%) of the cohort was lost to follow-up. The prevalence of depression at 10 weeks was 56.3% [95%CI 52.2-60.5], at 1 year was 42.4% [95%CI 38.3-46.5] and 10 years 38.4% [95%CI 34.3-42.5]. There was considerable change in individual scores over time in both directions. A multivariable analysis identified the independent predictors of 10-year depression score as lower GCS, social deprivation, female gender, past psychiatric history, alcohol intoxication and unemployment. Age, ethnicity, social support, TBI etiology, CT abnormality and medical comorbidity were insignificant.
Conclusions: While the overall level of symptoms at 10-year post-TBI remains high, there is considerable change in individual depression status over time. The predictors identified may allow the targeting of vulnerable sub-populations.
{"title":"Changes in depression symptoms over 10 years after TBI; a long-term prospective study.","authors":"Rajiv K Singh, Thomas J Humphries, Jeremy F Dawson, Julia Tiupin-Szulc, Suzanne Mason, Fiona E Lecky","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413639","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with depression symptoms at 10 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and compare with results at 10 weeks and 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large cohort of prospective admissions with TBI were followed up for 10 years. Depression using HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) score > 8 was measured. Several injury and demographic features were examined for association with depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 4 years, 1130 individuals were recruited of whom 916 attended at 1 year; after 10 years, 552 attended and 210 had died. 154 (17%) of the cohort was lost to follow-up. The prevalence of depression at 10 weeks was 56.3% [95%CI 52.2-60.5], at 1 year was 42.4% [95%CI 38.3-46.5] and 10 years 38.4% [95%CI 34.3-42.5]. There was considerable change in individual scores over time in both directions. A multivariable analysis identified the independent predictors of 10-year depression score as lower GCS, social deprivation, female gender, past psychiatric history, alcohol intoxication and unemployment. Age, ethnicity, social support, TBI etiology, CT abnormality and medical comorbidity were insignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the overall level of symptoms at 10-year post-TBI remains high, there is considerable change in individual depression status over time. The predictors identified may allow the targeting of vulnerable sub-populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"154-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Describe the survival, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of subjects with disorders of consciousness in a reference rehabilitation center, in a developing country.
Methods: Patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) caused by acquired neurological injuries, admitted between the years 2002-2018 in a neurorehabilitation center. Extracted data covered demographics, clinical details, survival time, and discharge information. Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to reveal, associations with survival.
Result: Out of 5064 neurological cases, 159 patients were diagnosed with DoC. The demographic data showed a male dominance (65%), with an average injury age of 42 years. The most common causes were traumatic (41%), anoxic (36%), and vascular (10%), with traffic accidents accounting for 71% of traumatic injuries. The study found that 75% of patients remained in a vegetative state (VS), and 25% in a minimally conscious state (MCS), with an average survival of 2110 days.
Conclusion: There were no significant differences in survival days between patients in MCS and VS. Patients with traumatic injuries showed a higher survival rate than those with non-traumatic injuries. Age and etiology were identified as factors associated with a higher risk of death.
{"title":"Survival and clinical characteristics of patients with disorders of consciousness in a developing country between 2002 and 2018.","authors":"Viviana Cornejo-Suil, Gonzalo Rivera-Lillo, Rodrigo Melo-Martínez, Felipe Covarrubias-Escudero, Nicolás Marín-Godoy, Rodrigo Torres-Castro","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409357","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the survival, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of subjects with disorders of consciousness in a reference rehabilitation center, in a developing country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) caused by acquired neurological injuries, admitted between the years 2002-2018 in a neurorehabilitation center. Extracted data covered demographics, clinical details, survival time, and discharge information. Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to reveal, associations with survival.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Out of 5064 neurological cases, 159 patients were diagnosed with DoC. The demographic data showed a male dominance (65%), with an average injury age of 42 years. The most common causes were traumatic (41%), anoxic (36%), and vascular (10%), with traffic accidents accounting for 71% of traumatic injuries. The study found that 75% of patients remained in a vegetative state (VS), and 25% in a minimally conscious state (MCS), with an average survival of 2110 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences in survival days between patients in MCS and VS. Patients with traumatic injuries showed a higher survival rate than those with non-traumatic injuries. Age and etiology were identified as factors associated with a higher risk of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28Epub Date: 2024-10-07DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297
Josh W Faulkner, Deborah L Snell, R J Siegert
Objective: In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 items (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.
Method: Treatment-seeking adults (n = 347) were recruited from outpatient rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Dimensionality, reliability, person separation index, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the DASS-21 were examined using Rasch analysis.
Results: Initial analysis of the complete 21-item DASS showed poor overall fit due to problems with individual items. Fit to the Rasch model was excellent when treated as three composite scores. The stress subscale demonstrated adequate model fit, dimensionality and good reliability. For anxiety, fit was not good, reliability was unsatisfactory and DIF was evident on one item. When this item was removed, fit to the model was still inadequate as was reliability. DIF was also evident for depression, but when this item was removed, fit to the model was adequate.
Conclusion: The DASS-21 is a psychometrically sound measure of distress and stress for adults seeking treatment following mTBI. Ordinal to interval score conversion tables are provided to increase the precision of measurement. When assessing depression in a mTBI population, a 6-item depression subscale is recommended. Caution is advised in using the DASS-21 anxiety subscale alone.
{"title":"Rasch analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury sample.","authors":"Josh W Faulkner, Deborah L Snell, R J Siegert","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 items (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Treatment-seeking adults (<i>n</i> = 347) were recruited from outpatient rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Dimensionality, reliability, person separation index, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the DASS-21 were examined using Rasch analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial analysis of the complete 21-item DASS showed poor overall fit due to problems with individual items. Fit to the Rasch model was excellent when treated as three composite scores. The stress subscale demonstrated adequate model fit, dimensionality and good reliability. For anxiety, fit was not good, reliability was unsatisfactory and DIF was evident on one item. When this item was removed, fit to the model was still inadequate as was reliability. DIF was also evident for depression, but when this item was removed, fit to the model was adequate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DASS-21 is a psychometrically sound measure of distress and stress for adults seeking treatment following mTBI. Ordinal to interval score conversion tables are provided to increase the precision of measurement. When assessing depression in a mTBI population, a 6-item depression subscale is recommended. Caution is advised in using the DASS-21 anxiety subscale alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142379982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28Epub Date: 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2411292
Jessica Salley Riccardi, Molly Hale
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to extend on previous research finding by investigating adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and brain injury in children younger than 12 years old.
Methods: A total of 58,601 US children under 12 years old were included in the 2020-2021 National Survey of Children's Health, a self-reported national survey administered to caregivers.
Results: ACEs were significantly associated with increased risk for unconfirmed (χ2 (55891, 55904) = 141.84, p < 0.001, R2 = .03) and confirmed brain injury, χ2 (56481, 56494) = 508.28, p < 0.001, R2 = .05 when accounting for demographic characteristics. The association between ACEs and brain injury was not contingent on sports involvement; females not involved in sports had the strongest association between ACEs and brain injury (χ2 (10938, 10951) = 99.40, p < 0.001, R2 = .03) compared to sports-involved females and males. For children under 12 years old with brain injury, the relations between experiencing at least one ACE and health and educational outcomes were significant for all health and educational outcomes (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Caregiver education on and screening for brain injury in families experiencing ACEs would likely support more timely identification and management of co-occurring brain injury in this population. Further research is needed to identify prevention, assessment, and management strategies that would be specifically beneficial to children at risk for co-occurring brain injury and ACEs to improve health and educational outcomes.
{"title":"Adverse childhood experiences and brain injury in younger children: Findings from the 2021-2022 National Survey of Children's Health.","authors":"Jessica Salley Riccardi, Molly Hale","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411292","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to extend on previous research finding by investigating adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and brain injury in children younger than 12 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 58,601 US children under 12 years old were included in the 2020-2021 National Survey of Children's Health, a self-reported national survey administered to caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACEs were significantly associated with increased risk for unconfirmed (χ<sup>2</sup> (55891, 55904) = 141.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = .03) and confirmed brain injury, χ<sup>2</sup> (56481, 56494) = 508.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = .05 when accounting for demographic characteristics. The association between ACEs and brain injury was not contingent on sports involvement; females not involved in sports had the strongest association between ACEs and brain injury (χ<sup>2</sup> (10938, 10951) = 99.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = .03) compared to sports-involved females and males. For children under 12 years old with brain injury, the relations between experiencing at least one ACE and health and educational outcomes were significant for all health and educational outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver education on and screening for brain injury in families experiencing ACEs would likely support more timely identification and management of co-occurring brain injury in this population. Further research is needed to identify prevention, assessment, and management strategies that would be specifically beneficial to children at risk for co-occurring brain injury and ACEs to improve health and educational outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"126-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: We conducted a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the effects of galantamine treatment versus placebo combined to cognitive rehabilitation (CR) after stroke.
Materials and methods: In this 12-week, double blinded, randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned to either combined approach of galantamine and CR (G-CR) or placebo and CR (P-CR). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who crossed over from vascular cognitive disorder (VCD) to no-VCD at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in cognition, mood, quality of life and the N-back fMRI paradigm, assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks and after an 8-week washout period.
Results: Ten patients were allocated to G-RC group, 12 to the P-RC group. After 12 weeks, 40.1% of all patients converted to no-VCD with similar proportions between groups. Both groups showed improvements in episodic and working memory, executive and quality of life after 6 weeks of CR. Decreased depression and anxiety were noted, and all benefits persisted after the washout period. An interaction effect was observed in the right parietal lobule during the N-back task.
Conclusions: Interventions lead to improved cognition and distinct cortical reorganization without being able to establish correlation between neural changes and behavioral measures.
{"title":"Galantamine combined with cognitive rehabilitation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Mélanie Planton, Federico Nemmi, Berengère Pages, Jean-François Albucher, Nicolas Raposo, Lola Danet, Patrice Péran, Jérémie Pariente","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409355","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the effects of galantamine treatment versus placebo combined to cognitive rehabilitation (CR) after stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this 12-week, double blinded, randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned to either combined approach of galantamine and CR (G-CR) or placebo and CR (P-CR). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who crossed over from vascular cognitive disorder (VCD) to no-VCD at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in cognition, mood, quality of life and the <i>N</i>-back fMRI paradigm, assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks and after an 8-week washout period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were allocated to G-RC group, 12 to the P-RC group. After 12 weeks, 40.1% of all patients converted to no-VCD with similar proportions between groups. Both groups showed improvements in episodic and working memory, executive and quality of life after 6 weeks of CR. Decreased depression and anxiety were noted, and all benefits persisted after the washout period. An interaction effect was observed in the right parietal lobule during the <i>N</i>-back task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions lead to improved cognition and distinct cortical reorganization without being able to establish correlation between neural changes and behavioral measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"108-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28Epub Date: 2024-09-22DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2405209
Jenna R Groh, Eukyung Yhang, Yorghos Tripodis, Joseph Palminsano, Brett Martin, Erin Burke, Urja Bhatia, Jesse Mez, Robert A Stern, John Gunstad, Michael L Alosco
Background: Former professional collision sport (CS) athletes, particularly American football players, are at risk of developing chronic health conditions; however, little is known about the health outcomes of amateur athletes.
Methods: A 60-item health survey examined self-reported symptoms and diagnoses among former Division 1 Collegiate CS athletes and non- or limited-contact sport (non-CS) athletes. Binary logistic regressions tested the association between playing CS and health outcomes.
Results: Five hundred and two (6.2%) participants completed the survey: 160 CS athletes (mean age: 59.2, SD = 16.0) and 303 non-CS athletes (mean age: 54.0, SD = 16.9). CS athletes had increased odds of reported cognitive complaints and neuropsychiatric symptoms including memory (Padj < 0.01), attention/concentration (Padj = 0.01), problem solving/multi-tasking (Padj = 0.05), language (Padj = 0.02), anxiety (Padj = 0.04), impulsivity (Padj = 0.02), short-fuse/rage/explosivity (Padj < 0.001), and violence/aggression (Padj = 0.02). CS athletes also reported higher rates of sleep apnea (Padj = 0.02). There were no group differences in cardiovascular and physical health outcomes.
Conclusions: Former CS athletes reported more cognitive and neuropsychiatric complaints. The low response rate is a limitation of this study; however, over 500,000 athletes play college sports each year, thus research on long-term health outcomes in this population is critical.
{"title":"Health outcomes of former division I college athletes.","authors":"Jenna R Groh, Eukyung Yhang, Yorghos Tripodis, Joseph Palminsano, Brett Martin, Erin Burke, Urja Bhatia, Jesse Mez, Robert A Stern, John Gunstad, Michael L Alosco","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2405209","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2405209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Former professional collision sport (CS) athletes, particularly American football players, are at risk of developing chronic health conditions; however, little is known about the health outcomes of amateur athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 60-item health survey examined self-reported symptoms and diagnoses among former Division 1 Collegiate CS athletes and non- or limited-contact sport (non-CS) athletes. Binary logistic regressions tested the association between playing CS and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and two (6.2%) participants completed the survey: 160 CS athletes (mean age: 59.2, SD = 16.0) and 303 non-CS athletes (mean age: 54.0, SD = 16.9). CS athletes had increased odds of reported cognitive complaints and neuropsychiatric symptoms including memory (P<sub>adj</sub> < 0.01), attention/concentration (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.01), problem solving/multi-tasking (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.05), language (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02), anxiety (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.04), impulsivity (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02), short-fuse/rage/explosivity (P<sub>adj</sub> < 0.001), and violence/aggression (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02). CS athletes also reported higher rates of sleep apnea (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02). There were no group differences in cardiovascular and physical health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Former CS athletes reported more cognitive and neuropsychiatric complaints. The low response rate is a limitation of this study; however, over 500,000 athletes play college sports each year, thus research on long-term health outcomes in this population is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"88-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-28Epub Date: 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2413628
Dawn Neumann, Devan Parrott, Mark A Lumley, Michael W Williams, Fahad Qureshi, Flora M Hammond
Objectives: Preliminary examination of emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain (CP) and exploration of psychological factors as mediators or moderators of these relationships.
Methods: Cross-sectional study in adults (N = 59) with chronic TBI and CP using Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 Difficulty Identifying and Describing Feelings subscales; Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire; Emotional Approach Coping Scale; PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales, Michigan Body Map (pain widespreadness); headache frequency; Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (psychological distress), and Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian.
Results: Difficulty Identifying Feelings was positively associated with pain intensity, pain interference, and headache frequency. Difficulty Describing Feelings was positively correlated with pain interference and headache frequency. Emotional Approach Coping was inversely correlated with headache frequency. Emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain outcomes were mediated by Pain Catastrophizing; Difficulty Describing Feelings relationships with Pain Interference and headache frequency were mediated by psychological distress; and Difficulty Describing Feelings associations with Pain Interference were mediated by post-traumatic stress. No moderators were identified.
Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that emotional awareness/expression is linked to pain in adults with TBI and CP, which may be connected via pain catastrophizing and psychological distress. If longitudinal studies with larger samples produce similar findings, researchers should explore training emotional awareness/expression for possible pain management after TBI.
目标:初步研究创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和慢性疼痛(CP)患者的情感意识/表达与疼痛之间的关系,并探讨作为这些关系的中介或调节因素的心理因素:对患有慢性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和慢性疼痛(CP)的成年人(N = 59)进行横断面研究,使用多伦多症状量表(Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 Difficulty Identifying and Describing Feelings subscales)、情绪表达矛盾性问卷(Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire)、情绪接近应对量表(Emotional Approach Coping Scale)、PROMIS 疼痛强度和疼痛干扰量表(PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales)、密歇根身体分布图(Michigan Body Map)(疼痛广泛性)、头痛频率(headache frequency)、疼痛灾难化量表(Pain Catastrophizing Scale)、简明症状量表(Brief Symptom Inventory-18)(心理困扰)和创伤后压力检查表(Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian):结果:识别感觉困难与疼痛强度、疼痛干扰和头痛频率呈正相关。描述感觉困难与疼痛干扰和头痛频率呈正相关。情绪应对方法与头痛频率成反比。情绪意识/表达与疼痛结果的关系受疼痛灾难化的中介作用;描述感觉困难与疼痛干扰和头痛频率的关系受心理困扰的中介作用;描述感觉困难与疼痛干扰的关系受创伤后应激的中介作用。没有发现调节因素:这些初步研究结果表明,情感意识/情感表达与患有创伤性脑损伤和CP的成年人的疼痛有关,可能通过疼痛灾难化和心理困扰联系在一起。如果对更大样本进行的纵向研究得出类似的结果,研究人员应探索训练情感意识/表达,以便在创伤性脑损伤后进行可能的疼痛管理。
{"title":"Emotional awareness and expression difficulties in relation to pain experiences in people with brain injury and chronic pain: preliminary investigation.","authors":"Dawn Neumann, Devan Parrott, Mark A Lumley, Michael W Williams, Fahad Qureshi, Flora M Hammond","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413628","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Preliminary examination of emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain (CP) and exploration of psychological factors as mediators or moderators of these relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study in adults (<i>N</i> = 59) with chronic TBI and CP using Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 Difficulty Identifying and Describing Feelings subscales; Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire; Emotional Approach Coping Scale; PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales, Michigan Body Map (pain widespreadness); headache frequency; Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (psychological distress), and Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Difficulty Identifying Feelings was positively associated with pain intensity, pain interference, and headache frequency. Difficulty Describing Feelings was positively correlated with pain interference and headache frequency. Emotional Approach Coping was inversely correlated with headache frequency. Emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain outcomes were mediated by Pain Catastrophizing; Difficulty Describing Feelings relationships with Pain Interference and headache frequency were mediated by psychological distress; and Difficulty Describing Feelings associations with Pain Interference were mediated by post-traumatic stress. No moderators were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary findings suggest that emotional awareness/expression is linked to pain in adults with TBI and CP, which may be connected via pain catastrophizing and psychological distress. If longitudinal studies with larger samples produce similar findings, researchers should explore training emotional awareness/expression for possible pain management after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}