首页 > 最新文献

Brain injury最新文献

英文 中文
Magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury: a survey of clinical practitioners' experiences and views on current practice and obstacles.
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001
Karen Caeyenberghs, Mervyn Singh, Annalee L Cobden, Elizabeth G Ellis, Liam G Graeme, Priscilla Gates, Alex Burmester, Jade Guarnera, Jake Burnett, Evelyn M Deutscher, Lyndon Firman-Sadler, Bec Joyce, Jacqueline P Notarianni, Christian Pardo de Figueroa Flores, Juan F Domínguez D

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized our capacity to examine brain alterations in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known about the level of implementation of MRI techniques in clinical practice in TBI and associated obstacles.

Methods: A diverse set of health professionals completed 19 multiple choice and free text survey questions.

Results: Of the 81 respondents, 73.4% reported that they acquire/order MRI scans in TBI patients, and 66% indicated they would prefer MRI be more often used with this cohort. The greatest impediment for MRI usage was scanner availability (57.1%). Less than half of respondents (42.1%) indicated that they perform advanced MRI analysis. Factors such as dedicated experts within the team (44.4%) and user-friendly MRI analysis tools (40.7%), were listed as potentially helpful to implement advanced MRI analyses in clinical practice.

Conclusion: Results suggest a wide variability in the purpose, timing, and composition of the scanning protocol of clinical MRI after TBI. Three recommendations are described to broaden implementation of MRI in clinical practice in TBI: 1) development of a standardized multimodal MRI protocol; 2) future directions for the use of advanced MRI analyses; 3) use of low-field MRI to overcome technical/practical issues with high-field MRI.

{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury: a survey of clinical practitioners' experiences and views on current practice and obstacles.","authors":"Karen Caeyenberghs, Mervyn Singh, Annalee L Cobden, Elizabeth G Ellis, Liam G Graeme, Priscilla Gates, Alex Burmester, Jade Guarnera, Jake Burnett, Evelyn M Deutscher, Lyndon Firman-Sadler, Bec Joyce, Jacqueline P Notarianni, Christian Pardo de Figueroa Flores, Juan F Domínguez D","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2443001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized our capacity to examine brain alterations in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, little is known about the level of implementation of MRI techniques in clinical practice in TBI and associated obstacles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diverse set of health professionals completed 19 multiple choice and free text survey questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 81 respondents, 73.4% reported that they acquire/order MRI scans in TBI patients, and 66% indicated they would prefer MRI be more often used with this cohort. The greatest impediment for MRI usage was scanner availability (57.1%). Less than half of respondents (42.1%) indicated that they perform advanced MRI analysis. Factors such as dedicated experts within the team (44.4%) and user-friendly MRI analysis tools (40.7%), were listed as potentially helpful to implement advanced MRI analyses in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest a wide variability in the purpose, timing, and composition of the scanning protocol of clinical MRI after TBI. Three recommendations are described to broaden implementation of MRI in clinical practice in TBI: 1) development of a standardized multimodal MRI protocol; 2) future directions for the use of advanced MRI analyses; 3) use of low-field MRI to overcome technical/practical issues with high-field MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143058077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
LIMBIC military and tactical athlete research study: making lemonade 101. LIMBIC 军事和战术运动员研究:制作柠檬水 101。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2392251
Jacob E Resch, David X Cifu

The Long-term Impact of Military-relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Military and Tactical Athlete Research Study (LIMBIC MATARS) program established in 2020 is comprised of 22 universities and health systems across the United States. The LIMBIC MATARS Consortium's goal is to increase understanding of the complexities of concussion in collegiate athletes by leveraging extant retrospective and novel prospective data sets through the application of innovative research designs. The manuscripts in this special issue represent findings from clinical data sets based on consensus-derived common data elements collected from the 2015-2016 to 2019-2020 sport seasons that include 1311 cases of collegiate athletes diagnosed with concussion. Using these data, LIMBIC MATARS investigators addressed hypotheses that included (1) factors, including access to athletic trainers, biological sex, and ADHD, that may influence recovery from concussion, (2) predisposing risks associated with reinjury after return-to-sport, such as sport type, and (3) therapeutic targets for intervention including language barriers, physical activity, return-to-learn, and sleep. This commentary introduces the methodology and 10 descriptive studies highlighting initial findings from the Consortium.

军事相关脑损伤长期影响联合会--军事和战术运动员研究项目(LIMBIC MATARS)成立于 2020 年,由全美 22 所大学和医疗系统组成。LIMBIC MATARS联盟的目标是通过应用创新的研究设计,利用现有的回顾性和新颖的前瞻性数据集,加深对大学生运动员脑震荡复杂性的了解。本特刊中的手稿代表了临床数据集的研究结果,这些数据集基于从 2015-2016 年至 2019-2020 年运动赛季收集的共识衍生的通用数据元素,其中包括 1311 例被诊断为脑震荡的大学生运动员。利用这些数据,LIMBIC MATARS 研究人员提出了一些假设,其中包括:(1)可能影响脑震荡恢复的因素,包括获得运动训练员的机会、生理性别和多动症;(2)与恢复运动后再次受伤相关的易感风险,如运动类型;以及(3)干预治疗目标,包括语言障碍、体育活动、恢复学习和睡眠。本评论介绍了研究方法和 10 项描述性研究,重点介绍了联合会的初步研究结果。
{"title":"LIMBIC military and tactical athlete research study: making lemonade 101.","authors":"Jacob E Resch, David X Cifu","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2392251","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2392251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Long-term Impact of Military-relevant Brain Injury Consortium-Military and Tactical Athlete Research Study (LIMBIC MATARS) program established in 2020 is comprised of 22 universities and health systems across the United States. The LIMBIC MATARS Consortium's goal is to increase understanding of the complexities of concussion in collegiate athletes by leveraging extant retrospective and novel prospective data sets through the application of innovative research designs. The manuscripts in this special issue represent findings from clinical data sets based on consensus-derived common data elements collected from the 2015-2016 to 2019-2020 sport seasons that include 1311 cases of collegiate athletes diagnosed with concussion. Using these data, LIMBIC MATARS investigators addressed hypotheses that included (1) factors, including access to athletic trainers, biological sex, and ADHD, that may influence recovery from concussion, (2) predisposing risks associated with reinjury after return-to-sport, such as sport type, and (3) therapeutic targets for intervention including language barriers, physical activity, return-to-learn, and sleep. This commentary introduces the methodology and 10 descriptive studies highlighting initial findings from the Consortium.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"85-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding of head injury assessment and return to play processes and associated factors in United States Major League Rugby players. 了解美国橄榄球大联盟球员头部受伤评估和重返赛场过程及相关因素。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2408563
Owen M Sheehy, Katherine J Hunzinger, Christine M Baugh, Julie M Stamm

Objectives: Evaluate professional rugby players' self-reported perceived understanding of the head injury assessment (HIA) and return to play (RTP) processes and determine factors related to understanding and trust pertaining to these processes.

Methods: An electronic survey measured concepts of interest. A thematic analysis of player understanding was performed, and player statements were coded.

Results: 207 U.S. Major League Rugby (MLR) players participated (26.7 ± 3.4 years). HIA and RTP protocol understanding was not correlated with concussion history (p = 0.41). International rugby experience and trust regarding MLR support of the following protocols and opposing team medical staff practices varied in their relationship to HIA understanding. Trust that all MLR teams follow the same protocols was positively correlated with all HIA questions (ps < 0.03). No HIA questions were correlated with trust in their own team's medical staff. All trust questions were significantly correlated with RTP process understanding. Qualitative analysis identified four HIA- and RTP-related themes: education needs, staffing needs, HIA criticisms, and importance of player safety.

Conclusion: International playing experience and greater trust in the MLR and league stakeholders were associated with greater player understanding of the HIA and RTP protocols. These results provide insight into the importance of educating players on league-specific concussion protocols.

目的评估职业橄榄球运动员自我报告的对头部损伤评估(HIA)和重返赛场(RTP)流程的感知理解,并确定与这些流程相关的理解和信任因素:方法: 通过电子调查对相关概念进行测量。结果:207 名美国橄榄球大联盟 (MLR) 球员参加了调查(26.7 ± 3.4 岁)。对 HIA 和 RTP 协议的理解与脑震荡病史无关(p = 0.41)。国际橄榄球经验和对 MLR 支持以下协议的信任度以及对方球队医务人员的做法与对 HIA 理解的关系各不相同。对所有多国联队都遵循相同协议的信任度与所有 HIA 问题都呈正相关(Ps 结论:国际比赛经验以及对多国联赛和联赛利益相关者的更多信任与球员对 HIA 和 RTP 协议的更多理解有关。这些结果让我们深入了解了教育球员了解联赛特定脑震荡协议的重要性。
{"title":"Understanding of head injury assessment and return to play processes and associated factors in United States Major League Rugby players.","authors":"Owen M Sheehy, Katherine J Hunzinger, Christine M Baugh, Julie M Stamm","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2408563","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2408563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate professional rugby players' self-reported perceived understanding of the head injury assessment (HIA) and return to play (RTP) processes and determine factors related to understanding and trust pertaining to these processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey measured concepts of interest. A thematic analysis of player understanding was performed, and player statements were coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>207 U.S. Major League Rugby (MLR) players participated (26.7 ± 3.4 years). HIA and RTP protocol understanding was not correlated with concussion history (<i>p</i> = 0.41). International rugby experience and trust regarding MLR support of the following protocols and opposing team medical staff practices varied in their relationship to HIA understanding. Trust that all MLR teams follow the same protocols was positively correlated with all HIA questions (ps < 0.03). No HIA questions were correlated with trust in their own team's medical staff. All trust questions were significantly correlated with RTP process understanding. Qualitative analysis identified four HIA- and RTP-related themes: education needs, staffing needs, HIA criticisms, and importance of player safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>International playing experience and greater trust in the MLR and league stakeholders were associated with greater player understanding of the HIA and RTP protocols. These results provide insight into the importance of educating players on league-specific concussion protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"99-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in depression symptoms over 10 years after TBI; a long-term prospective study. 创伤性脑损伤 10 年后抑郁症状的变化;一项长期前瞻性研究。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-13 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2413639
Rajiv K Singh, Thomas J Humphries, Jeremy F Dawson, Julia Tiupin-Szulc, Suzanne Mason, Fiona E Lecky

Objective: Evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with depression symptoms at 10 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and compare with results at 10 weeks and 1 year.

Methods: A large cohort of prospective admissions with TBI were followed up for 10 years. Depression using HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) score > 8 was measured. Several injury and demographic features were examined for association with depression.

Results: Over 4 years, 1130 individuals were recruited of whom 916 attended at 1 year; after 10 years, 552 attended and 210 had died. 154 (17%) of the cohort was lost to follow-up. The prevalence of depression at 10 weeks was 56.3% [95%CI 52.2-60.5], at 1 year was 42.4% [95%CI 38.3-46.5] and 10 years 38.4% [95%CI 34.3-42.5]. There was considerable change in individual scores over time in both directions. A multivariable analysis identified the independent predictors of 10-year depression score as lower GCS, social deprivation, female gender, past psychiatric history, alcohol intoxication and unemployment. Age, ethnicity, social support, TBI etiology, CT abnormality and medical comorbidity were insignificant.

Conclusions: While the overall level of symptoms at 10-year post-TBI remains high, there is considerable change in individual depression status over time. The predictors identified may allow the targeting of vulnerable sub-populations.

目的评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)10年后抑郁症状的发生率和相关风险因素,并与10周和1年后的结果进行比较:对一大批前瞻性入院的创伤性脑损伤患者进行为期 10 年的随访。采用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)对得分大于 8 分的抑郁症患者进行测量。此外,还研究了一些损伤和人口特征与抑郁症的关联:在 4 年时间里,共招募了 1130 人,其中 916 人在 1 年时接受了治疗;10 年后,552 人接受了治疗,210 人死亡。154人(17%)失去了随访机会。10 周时抑郁症患病率为 56.3% [95%CI 52.2-60.5],1 年时患病率为 42.4% [95%CI 38.3-46.5],10 年时患病率为 38.4% [95%CI 34.3-42.5]。随着时间的推移,个人得分在两个方向上都有显著变化。一项多变量分析确定了 10 年抑郁评分的独立预测因素为较低的 GCS、社会贫困、女性性别、既往精神病史、酒精中毒和失业。而年龄、种族、社会支持、创伤性脑损伤病因、CT 异常和内科合并症则无显著影响:虽然创伤后 10 年的总体症状水平仍然很高,但随着时间的推移,个人抑郁状况会发生很大变化。所发现的预测因素可帮助确定易受影响的亚人群。
{"title":"Changes in depression symptoms over 10 years after TBI; a long-term prospective study.","authors":"Rajiv K Singh, Thomas J Humphries, Jeremy F Dawson, Julia Tiupin-Szulc, Suzanne Mason, Fiona E Lecky","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413639","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the prevalence and risk factors associated with depression symptoms at 10 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and compare with results at 10 weeks and 1 year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A large cohort of prospective admissions with TBI were followed up for 10 years. Depression using HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) score > 8 was measured. Several injury and demographic features were examined for association with depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 4 years, 1130 individuals were recruited of whom 916 attended at 1 year; after 10 years, 552 attended and 210 had died. 154 (17%) of the cohort was lost to follow-up. The prevalence of depression at 10 weeks was 56.3% [95%CI 52.2-60.5], at 1 year was 42.4% [95%CI 38.3-46.5] and 10 years 38.4% [95%CI 34.3-42.5]. There was considerable change in individual scores over time in both directions. A multivariable analysis identified the independent predictors of 10-year depression score as lower GCS, social deprivation, female gender, past psychiatric history, alcohol intoxication and unemployment. Age, ethnicity, social support, TBI etiology, CT abnormality and medical comorbidity were insignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the overall level of symptoms at 10-year post-TBI remains high, there is considerable change in individual depression status over time. The predictors identified may allow the targeting of vulnerable sub-populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"154-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival and clinical characteristics of patients with disorders of consciousness in a developing country between 2002 and 2018. 一个发展中国家 2002 年至 2018 年意识障碍患者的存活率和临床特征。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2409357
Viviana Cornejo-Suil, Gonzalo Rivera-Lillo, Rodrigo Melo-Martínez, Felipe Covarrubias-Escudero, Nicolás Marín-Godoy, Rodrigo Torres-Castro

Objective: Describe the survival, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of subjects with disorders of consciousness in a reference rehabilitation center, in a developing country.

Methods: Patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) caused by acquired neurological injuries, admitted between the years 2002-2018 in a neurorehabilitation center. Extracted data covered demographics, clinical details, survival time, and discharge information. Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to reveal, associations with survival.

Result: Out of 5064 neurological cases, 159 patients were diagnosed with DoC. The demographic data showed a male dominance (65%), with an average injury age of 42 years. The most common causes were traumatic (41%), anoxic (36%), and vascular (10%), with traffic accidents accounting for 71% of traumatic injuries. The study found that 75% of patients remained in a vegetative state (VS), and 25% in a minimally conscious state (MCS), with an average survival of 2110 days.

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in survival days between patients in MCS and VS. Patients with traumatic injuries showed a higher survival rate than those with non-traumatic injuries. Age and etiology were identified as factors associated with a higher risk of death.

目的描述发展中国家一家参考康复中心意识障碍患者的存活情况、社会人口学和临床特征:方法:2002-2018年间在一家神经康复中心住院的后天神经损伤导致的意识障碍(DoC)患者。提取的数据包括人口统计学、临床细节、存活时间和出院信息。研究采用 Cox 比例危险模型和 Kaplan-Meier 分析来揭示与存活率的关系:结果:在 5064 例神经系统病例中,有 159 例患者被确诊为 DoC。人口统计学数据显示,男性占多数(65%),平均受伤年龄为 42 岁。最常见的原因是外伤(41%)、缺氧(36%)和血管性损伤(10%),其中交通事故占外伤的 71%。研究发现,75%的患者仍处于植物人状态(VS),25%处于微意识状态(MCS),平均存活天数为2110天:外伤患者的存活率高于非外伤患者。年龄和病因被认为是死亡风险较高的相关因素。
{"title":"Survival and clinical characteristics of patients with disorders of consciousness in a developing country between 2002 and 2018.","authors":"Viviana Cornejo-Suil, Gonzalo Rivera-Lillo, Rodrigo Melo-Martínez, Felipe Covarrubias-Escudero, Nicolás Marín-Godoy, Rodrigo Torres-Castro","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409357","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409357","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe the survival, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of subjects with disorders of consciousness in a reference rehabilitation center, in a developing country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) caused by acquired neurological injuries, admitted between the years 2002-2018 in a neurorehabilitation center. Extracted data covered demographics, clinical details, survival time, and discharge information. Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to reveal, associations with survival.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Out of 5064 neurological cases, 159 patients were diagnosed with DoC. The demographic data showed a male dominance (65%), with an average injury age of 42 years. The most common causes were traumatic (41%), anoxic (36%), and vascular (10%), with traffic accidents accounting for 71% of traumatic injuries. The study found that 75% of patients remained in a vegetative state (VS), and 25% in a minimally conscious state (MCS), with an average survival of 2110 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences in survival days between patients in MCS and VS. Patients with traumatic injuries showed a higher survival rate than those with non-traumatic injuries. Age and etiology were identified as factors associated with a higher risk of death.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"118-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rasch analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury sample. 对轻度脑外伤样本中的抑郁焦虑压力量表-21(DASS-21)进行 Rasch 分析。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297
Josh W Faulkner, Deborah L Snell, R J Siegert

Objective: In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 items (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.

Method: Treatment-seeking adults (n = 347) were recruited from outpatient rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Dimensionality, reliability, person separation index, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the DASS-21 were examined using Rasch analysis.

Results: Initial analysis of the complete 21-item DASS showed poor overall fit due to problems with individual items. Fit to the Rasch model was excellent when treated as three composite scores. The stress subscale demonstrated adequate model fit, dimensionality and good reliability. For anxiety, fit was not good, reliability was unsatisfactory and DIF was evident on one item. When this item was removed, fit to the model was still inadequate as was reliability. DIF was also evident for depression, but when this item was removed, fit to the model was adequate.

Conclusion: The DASS-21 is a psychometrically sound measure of distress and stress for adults seeking treatment following mTBI. Ordinal to interval score conversion tables are provided to increase the precision of measurement. When assessing depression in a mTBI population, a 6-item depression subscale is recommended. Caution is advised in using the DASS-21 anxiety subscale alone.

目的:本研究评估了轻度创伤性脑损伤样本中抑郁焦虑压力量表 21 个项目(DASS-21)的心理测量特性:在这项研究中,我们评估了轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)样本中抑郁焦虑压力量表 21 个条目(DASS-21)的心理测量特性:方法:我们从新西兰的门诊康复服务机构招募了寻求治疗的成年人(n = 347)。采用 Rasch 分析法对 DASS-21 的维度、可靠性、人员分离指数和差异项目功能(DIF)进行了研究:结果:对完整的 21 个条目 DASS 的初步分析表明,由于个别条目存在问题,整体拟合度较差。如果将其作为三个综合分数处理,则与 Rasch 模型的拟合度非常好。压力分量表显示出足够的模型拟合度、维度和良好的可靠性。在焦虑方面,拟合效果不佳,信度不理想,而且有一个项目的 DIF 很明显。删除该项目后,模型的拟合度和信度仍不理想。抑郁症的 DIF 也很明显,但去掉这个项目后,模型的拟合度还是足够的:结论:DASS-21 是一种心理测量方法,适用于 mTBI 后寻求治疗的成年人。为了提高测量的精确度,我们提供了从序数到区间的分数转换表。在对 mTBI 群体进行抑郁评估时,建议使用 6 项抑郁子量表。建议谨慎单独使用 DASS-21 焦虑分量表。
{"title":"Rasch analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury sample.","authors":"Josh W Faulkner, Deborah L Snell, R J Siegert","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21 items (DASS-21) in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Treatment-seeking adults (<i>n</i> = 347) were recruited from outpatient rehabilitation services in New Zealand. Dimensionality, reliability, person separation index, and differential item functioning (DIF) of the DASS-21 were examined using Rasch analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial analysis of the complete 21-item DASS showed poor overall fit due to problems with individual items. Fit to the Rasch model was excellent when treated as three composite scores. The stress subscale demonstrated adequate model fit, dimensionality and good reliability. For anxiety, fit was not good, reliability was unsatisfactory and DIF was evident on one item. When this item was removed, fit to the model was still inadequate as was reliability. DIF was also evident for depression, but when this item was removed, fit to the model was adequate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DASS-21 is a psychometrically sound measure of distress and stress for adults seeking treatment following mTBI. Ordinal to interval score conversion tables are provided to increase the precision of measurement. When assessing depression in a mTBI population, a 6-item depression subscale is recommended. Caution is advised in using the DASS-21 anxiety subscale alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142379982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse childhood experiences and brain injury in younger children: Findings from the 2021-2022 National Survey of Children's Health. 年幼儿童的不良童年经历和脑损伤:2021-2022 年全国儿童健康调查的结果。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2411292
Jessica Salley Riccardi, Molly Hale

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to extend on previous research finding by investigating adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and brain injury in children younger than 12 years old.

Methods: A total of 58,601 US children under 12 years old were included in the 2020-2021 National Survey of Children's Health, a self-reported national survey administered to caregivers.

Results: ACEs were significantly associated with increased risk for unconfirmed (χ2 (55891, 55904) = 141.84, p < 0.001, R2 = .03) and confirmed brain injury, χ2 (56481, 56494) = 508.28, p < 0.001, R2 = .05 when accounting for demographic characteristics. The association between ACEs and brain injury was not contingent on sports involvement; females not involved in sports had the strongest association between ACEs and brain injury (χ2 (10938, 10951) = 99.40, p < 0.001, R2 = .03) compared to sports-involved females and males. For children under 12 years old with brain injury, the relations between experiencing at least one ACE and health and educational outcomes were significant for all health and educational outcomes (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Caregiver education on and screening for brain injury in families experiencing ACEs would likely support more timely identification and management of co-occurring brain injury in this population. Further research is needed to identify prevention, assessment, and management strategies that would be specifically beneficial to children at risk for co-occurring brain injury and ACEs to improve health and educational outcomes.

目的:本研究的目的是通过调查 12 岁以下儿童的童年不良经历(ACE)和脑损伤情况来扩展以往的研究成果:2020-2021年美国全国儿童健康调查共纳入了58601名12岁以下的美国儿童:ACE与未经证实的脑损伤(χ2 (55891, 55904) = 141.84, p 2 = .03)和已证实的脑损伤(χ2 (56481, 56494) = 508.28, p < 0.001, R2 = .05)的风险增加有明显关联。ACE与脑损伤之间的关联与参与体育运动无关;与参与体育运动的女性和男性相比,未参与体育运动的女性ACE与脑损伤之间的关联最强(χ2 (10938, 10951) = 99.40, p 2 = .03)。对于 12 岁以下的脑损伤儿童,至少经历过一次 ACE 与健康和教育结果之间的关系对所有健康和教育结果都是显著的(p 结论:对于 12 岁以下的脑损伤儿童,经历过至少一次 ACE 与健康和教育结果之间的关系对所有健康和教育结果都是显著的:在经历过 ACE 的家庭中对照顾者进行有关脑损伤的教育和筛查可能有助于更及时地识别和管理这一人群中的并发脑损伤。需要开展进一步的研究,以确定哪些预防、评估和管理策略特别有利于面临脑损伤和 ACEs 并发症风险的儿童,从而改善他们的健康和教育成果。
{"title":"Adverse childhood experiences and brain injury in younger children: Findings from the 2021-2022 National Survey of Children's Health.","authors":"Jessica Salley Riccardi, Molly Hale","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411292","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2411292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to extend on previous research finding by investigating adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and brain injury in children younger than 12 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 58,601 US children under 12 years old were included in the 2020-2021 National Survey of Children's Health, a self-reported national survey administered to caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACEs were significantly associated with increased risk for unconfirmed (χ<sup>2</sup> (55891, 55904) = 141.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = .03) and confirmed brain injury, χ<sup>2</sup> (56481, 56494) = 508.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = .05 when accounting for demographic characteristics. The association between ACEs and brain injury was not contingent on sports involvement; females not involved in sports had the strongest association between ACEs and brain injury (χ<sup>2</sup> (10938, 10951) = 99.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = .03) compared to sports-involved females and males. For children under 12 years old with brain injury, the relations between experiencing at least one ACE and health and educational outcomes were significant for all health and educational outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver education on and screening for brain injury in families experiencing ACEs would likely support more timely identification and management of co-occurring brain injury in this population. Further research is needed to identify prevention, assessment, and management strategies that would be specifically beneficial to children at risk for co-occurring brain injury and ACEs to improve health and educational outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"126-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Galantamine combined with cognitive rehabilitation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a proof-of-concept study. 加兰他敏联合认知康复治疗脑卒中后认知障碍:概念验证研究。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2409355
Mélanie Planton, Federico Nemmi, Berengère Pages, Jean-François Albucher, Nicolas Raposo, Lola Danet, Patrice Péran, Jérémie Pariente

Purpose: We conducted a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the effects of galantamine treatment versus placebo combined to cognitive rehabilitation (CR) after stroke.

Materials and methods: In this 12-week, double blinded, randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned to either combined approach of galantamine and CR (G-CR) or placebo and CR (P-CR). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who crossed over from vascular cognitive disorder (VCD) to no-VCD at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in cognition, mood, quality of life and the N-back fMRI paradigm, assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks and after an 8-week washout period.

Results: Ten patients were allocated to G-RC group, 12 to the P-RC group. After 12 weeks, 40.1% of all patients converted to no-VCD with similar proportions between groups. Both groups showed improvements in episodic and working memory, executive and quality of life after 6 weeks of CR. Decreased depression and anxiety were noted, and all benefits persisted after the washout period. An interaction effect was observed in the right parietal lobule during the N-back task.

Conclusions: Interventions lead to improved cognition and distinct cortical reorganization without being able to establish correlation between neural changes and behavioral measures.

目的:我们进行了一项概念验证研究,评估中风后加兰他敏治疗与安慰剂联合认知康复(CR)的效果:在这项为期 12 周的双盲随机对照试验中,患者被分配接受加兰他敏和认知康复(G-CR)或安慰剂和认知康复(P-CR)的联合治疗。主要结果是12周时从血管性认知障碍(VCD)转为无VCD的患者比例。次要结果包括认知、情绪、生活质量和N-back fMRI范式的变化,分别在基线、6周、12周和8周冲洗期后进行评估:10名患者被分配到G-RC组,12名患者被分配到P-RC组。12 周后,40.1% 的患者转为无 VCD,组间比例相似。接受 CR 治疗 6 周后,两组患者的外显记忆和工作记忆、执行力和生活质量均有所改善。抑郁和焦虑有所减轻,所有益处在冲洗期后仍持续存在。在N-back任务中,在右顶叶观察到了交互效应:干预可改善认知和明显的皮质重组,但无法在神经变化和行为测量之间建立相关性。
{"title":"Galantamine combined with cognitive rehabilitation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Mélanie Planton, Federico Nemmi, Berengère Pages, Jean-François Albucher, Nicolas Raposo, Lola Danet, Patrice Péran, Jérémie Pariente","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409355","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2409355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the effects of galantamine treatment versus placebo combined to cognitive rehabilitation (CR) after stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this 12-week, double blinded, randomized, controlled trial, patients were assigned to either combined approach of galantamine and CR (G-CR) or placebo and CR (P-CR). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who crossed over from vascular cognitive disorder (VCD) to no-VCD at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in cognition, mood, quality of life and the <i>N</i>-back fMRI paradigm, assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks and after an 8-week washout period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were allocated to G-RC group, 12 to the P-RC group. After 12 weeks, 40.1% of all patients converted to no-VCD with similar proportions between groups. Both groups showed improvements in episodic and working memory, executive and quality of life after 6 weeks of CR. Decreased depression and anxiety were noted, and all benefits persisted after the washout period. An interaction effect was observed in the right parietal lobule during the <i>N</i>-back task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions lead to improved cognition and distinct cortical reorganization without being able to establish correlation between neural changes and behavioral measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"108-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health outcomes of former division I college athletes. 退役一级运动员的健康状况。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-09-22 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2405209
Jenna R Groh, Eukyung Yhang, Yorghos Tripodis, Joseph Palminsano, Brett Martin, Erin Burke, Urja Bhatia, Jesse Mez, Robert A Stern, John Gunstad, Michael L Alosco

Background: Former professional collision sport (CS) athletes, particularly American football players, are at risk of developing chronic health conditions; however, little is known about the health outcomes of amateur athletes.

Methods: A 60-item health survey examined self-reported symptoms and diagnoses among former Division 1 Collegiate CS athletes and non- or limited-contact sport (non-CS) athletes. Binary logistic regressions tested the association between playing CS and health outcomes.

Results: Five hundred and two (6.2%) participants completed the survey: 160 CS athletes (mean age: 59.2, SD = 16.0) and 303 non-CS athletes (mean age: 54.0, SD = 16.9). CS athletes had increased odds of reported cognitive complaints and neuropsychiatric symptoms including memory (Padj < 0.01), attention/concentration (Padj = 0.01), problem solving/multi-tasking (Padj = 0.05), language (Padj = 0.02), anxiety (Padj = 0.04), impulsivity (Padj = 0.02), short-fuse/rage/explosivity (Padj < 0.001), and violence/aggression (Padj = 0.02). CS athletes also reported higher rates of sleep apnea (Padj = 0.02). There were no group differences in cardiovascular and physical health outcomes.

Conclusions: Former CS athletes reported more cognitive and neuropsychiatric complaints. The low response rate is a limitation of this study; however, over 500,000 athletes play college sports each year, thus research on long-term health outcomes in this population is critical.

背景:前职业碰撞运动(CS)运动员,尤其是美式橄榄球运动员,有可能患上慢性疾病;然而,人们对业余运动员的健康状况知之甚少:一项包含 60 个项目的健康调查研究了前第一级大学 CS 运动员和非或有限接触运动(非 CS)运动员自我报告的症状和诊断。二元逻辑回归测试了CS运动与健康结果之间的关联:共有 520 名(6.2%)参与者完成了调查:160 名 CS 运动员(平均年龄:59.2 岁,SD = 16.0)和 303 名非 CS 运动员(平均年龄:54.0 岁,SD = 16.9)完成了调查。CS运动员报告的认知抱怨和神经精神症状的几率增加,包括记忆力(Padj < 0.01)、注意力/集中力(Padj = 0.01)、解决问题/多任务处理(Padj = 0.05)、语言(Padj = 0.02)、焦虑(Padj = 0.04)、冲动(Padj = 0.02)、短路/愤怒/爆发力(Padj < 0.001)和暴力/攻击(Padj = 0.02)。CS 运动员的睡眠呼吸暂停率也较高(Padj = 0.02)。在心血管和身体健康结果方面没有群体差异:结论:退役 CS 运动员报告的认知和神经精神疾病较多。本研究的局限性在于响应率较低;然而,每年有超过 50 万名运动员参加大学体育运动,因此对这一人群的长期健康结果进行研究至关重要。
{"title":"Health outcomes of former division I college athletes.","authors":"Jenna R Groh, Eukyung Yhang, Yorghos Tripodis, Joseph Palminsano, Brett Martin, Erin Burke, Urja Bhatia, Jesse Mez, Robert A Stern, John Gunstad, Michael L Alosco","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2405209","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2405209","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Former professional collision sport (CS) athletes, particularly American football players, are at risk of developing chronic health conditions; however, little is known about the health outcomes of amateur athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 60-item health survey examined self-reported symptoms and diagnoses among former Division 1 Collegiate CS athletes and non- or limited-contact sport (non-CS) athletes. Binary logistic regressions tested the association between playing CS and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and two (6.2%) participants completed the survey: 160 CS athletes (mean age: 59.2, SD = 16.0) and 303 non-CS athletes (mean age: 54.0, SD = 16.9). CS athletes had increased odds of reported cognitive complaints and neuropsychiatric symptoms including memory (P<sub>adj</sub> < 0.01), attention/concentration (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.01), problem solving/multi-tasking (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.05), language (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02), anxiety (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.04), impulsivity (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02), short-fuse/rage/explosivity (P<sub>adj</sub> < 0.001), and violence/aggression (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02). CS athletes also reported higher rates of sleep apnea (P<sub>adj</sub> = 0.02). There were no group differences in cardiovascular and physical health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Former CS athletes reported more cognitive and neuropsychiatric complaints. The low response rate is a limitation of this study; however, over 500,000 athletes play college sports each year, thus research on long-term health outcomes in this population is critical.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"88-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emotional awareness and expression difficulties in relation to pain experiences in people with brain injury and chronic pain: preliminary investigation. 脑损伤和慢性疼痛患者的情感意识和表达困难与疼痛体验的关系:初步调查。
IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Pub Date : 2025-01-28 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2413628
Dawn Neumann, Devan Parrott, Mark A Lumley, Michael W Williams, Fahad Qureshi, Flora M Hammond

Objectives: Preliminary examination of emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain (CP) and exploration of psychological factors as mediators or moderators of these relationships.

Methods: Cross-sectional study in adults (N = 59) with chronic TBI and CP using Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 Difficulty Identifying and Describing Feelings subscales; Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire; Emotional Approach Coping Scale; PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales, Michigan Body Map (pain widespreadness); headache frequency; Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (psychological distress), and Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian.

Results: Difficulty Identifying Feelings was positively associated with pain intensity, pain interference, and headache frequency. Difficulty Describing Feelings was positively correlated with pain interference and headache frequency. Emotional Approach Coping was inversely correlated with headache frequency. Emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain outcomes were mediated by Pain Catastrophizing; Difficulty Describing Feelings relationships with Pain Interference and headache frequency were mediated by psychological distress; and Difficulty Describing Feelings associations with Pain Interference were mediated by post-traumatic stress. No moderators were identified.

Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that emotional awareness/expression is linked to pain in adults with TBI and CP, which may be connected via pain catastrophizing and psychological distress. If longitudinal studies with larger samples produce similar findings, researchers should explore training emotional awareness/expression for possible pain management after TBI.

目标:初步研究创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和慢性疼痛(CP)患者的情感意识/表达与疼痛之间的关系,并探讨作为这些关系的中介或调节因素的心理因素:对患有慢性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和慢性疼痛(CP)的成年人(N = 59)进行横断面研究,使用多伦多症状量表(Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 Difficulty Identifying and Describing Feelings subscales)、情绪表达矛盾性问卷(Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire)、情绪接近应对量表(Emotional Approach Coping Scale)、PROMIS 疼痛强度和疼痛干扰量表(PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales)、密歇根身体分布图(Michigan Body Map)(疼痛广泛性)、头痛频率(headache frequency)、疼痛灾难化量表(Pain Catastrophizing Scale)、简明症状量表(Brief Symptom Inventory-18)(心理困扰)和创伤后压力检查表(Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian):结果:识别感觉困难与疼痛强度、疼痛干扰和头痛频率呈正相关。描述感觉困难与疼痛干扰和头痛频率呈正相关。情绪应对方法与头痛频率成反比。情绪意识/表达与疼痛结果的关系受疼痛灾难化的中介作用;描述感觉困难与疼痛干扰和头痛频率的关系受心理困扰的中介作用;描述感觉困难与疼痛干扰的关系受创伤后应激的中介作用。没有发现调节因素:这些初步研究结果表明,情感意识/情感表达与患有创伤性脑损伤和CP的成年人的疼痛有关,可能通过疼痛灾难化和心理困扰联系在一起。如果对更大样本进行的纵向研究得出类似的结果,研究人员应探索训练情感意识/表达,以便在创伤性脑损伤后进行可能的疼痛管理。
{"title":"Emotional awareness and expression difficulties in relation to pain experiences in people with brain injury and chronic pain: preliminary investigation.","authors":"Dawn Neumann, Devan Parrott, Mark A Lumley, Michael W Williams, Fahad Qureshi, Flora M Hammond","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413628","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2413628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Preliminary examination of emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain (CP) and exploration of psychological factors as mediators or moderators of these relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study in adults (<i>N</i> = 59) with chronic TBI and CP using Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 Difficulty Identifying and Describing Feelings subscales; Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire; Emotional Approach Coping Scale; PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference scales, Michigan Body Map (pain widespreadness); headache frequency; Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (psychological distress), and Post-traumatic Stress Checklist-Civilian.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Difficulty Identifying Feelings was positively associated with pain intensity, pain interference, and headache frequency. Difficulty Describing Feelings was positively correlated with pain interference and headache frequency. Emotional Approach Coping was inversely correlated with headache frequency. Emotional awareness/expression relationships with pain outcomes were mediated by Pain Catastrophizing; Difficulty Describing Feelings relationships with Pain Interference and headache frequency were mediated by psychological distress; and Difficulty Describing Feelings associations with Pain Interference were mediated by post-traumatic stress. No moderators were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These preliminary findings suggest that emotional awareness/expression is linked to pain in adults with TBI and CP, which may be connected via pain catastrophizing and psychological distress. If longitudinal studies with larger samples produce similar findings, researchers should explore training emotional awareness/expression for possible pain management after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Brain injury
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1