Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy最新文献

Objective: The study was aimed to investigate the influence factor between preoperative inflammatory indicators and drainage tube retention time in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 121 patients with breast cancer who were undergoing surgery between October 2020 and June 2021. The enumeration data were used the Chi-square test, and the measurement data were used the t-test analysis. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to access the risk factors for affecting drainage tube retention time in patients with breast cancer. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was performed to test the prediction effect of the model.

Results: Through the median extraction time of postoperative drainage tube retention time, all patients were divided into two groups: drainage tube retention time (DTRT) < 13 (d) and drainage tube retention time (DTRT) ≥ 13 (d). The results showed that type of surgery, total lymph nodes (TLN), pathological T stage, NLR were related to the drainage tube retention time (P<0.05). Moreover, the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis performed that Hb, type of surgery, pathological T stage, chest wall drainage tube, NRI were the independent risk predictors of affecting drainage tube retention time. Furthermore, a significant correlation existed between NRI and drainage tube retention at different times (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: NRI is an independent risk factor for postoperative drainage tube extraction time and can effectively predict the probability of drainage tube retention time. Thus, it can also provide personalized nursing intervention for patients with breast cancer after drainage tube retention time and the rehabilitation process.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have surfaced as a promising group of anticancer agents employing the precise targeting capacity of monoclonal antibodies to transport highly effective cytotoxic payloads. Compared to conventional chemotherapy, they aim to selectively eradicate cancer cells while minimizing off-target toxicity on healthy tissues. An increasing body of evidence has provided support for the efficacy of ADCs in treating breast cancer across various contexts and tumor subtypes, resulting in significant changes in clinical practice. Nevertheless, unlocking the full potential of these therapeutic agents demands innovative molecular designs to address complex clinical challenges, including drug resistance, tumor heterogeneity, and treatment-related adverse events. This thorough review provides an in-depth analysis of the clinical data on ADCs, offering crucial insights from pivotal clinical trials that assess the efficacy of ADCs in diverse breast cancer settings. This aids in providing a comprehensive understanding of the current state of ADCs in breast cancer therapy, while also providing valuable perspectives for the future.

Background: Positive margins on lumpectomy specimens are associated with a twofold increased risk of local breast tumor recurrence. Prior literature has demonstrated various techniques and modalities for assessing margin status to reduce re-excision rates. However, there is paucity of literature analyzing which margin contributes to the highest re-excision rates. Therefore, the primary aim of the study was to investigate whether the nipple-ward margins resulted in a higher rate of re-excision in our patient population.

Methods:  A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who had re-excision surgery. Nipple-ward margin was identified by correlating radiological and pathological reports. A cut-off of more than 25% was used to demonstrate correlation between nipple-ward margin and re-excision rate.

Results: A total of 98 patients' data were analyzed, with 41 (41.8%), 14 (14.3%), 5 (5.1%), and 38 (38.8%) diagnosed with DCIS, IDC, ILC, and mixed pathology on their margins, respectively. Overall, 48% (n=47) of the positive margins were nipple-ward, with 44.7% (n=21) reporting DCIS. Upon stratification, 45 (45.9%) cases were single-margin positive, with 26 (57.8%) being nipple-ward. Furthermore, the remaining 53 (54.1%) patients had multiple positive margins, with 21 (39.6.7%) nipple-ward cases.

Conclusion: Positive nipple-ward margins significantly contribute to a higher re-excision rate p < 0.001; 48% of re-excision surgeries had positive nipple-ward margins, and 57.8% of positive single-margin cases were nipple-ward. Taking an additional shave during initial lumpectomy decreases re-excision rates. However, planning a lumpectomy procedure with a more elliptical rather than a spherical resection with additional cavity shave (ie, larger volume) in the nipple-ward direction and minimizing the remaining cavity shaves so the total volume resected remains unchanged. Nevertheless, future studies with larger sample sizes are required to bolster our findings.

Objective: Breast cancer is the second most common malignancy globally and a leading cause of cancer death in women. Analysis of factors related to disease-free survival (DFS) has improved understanding of the disease and characteristics related to recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of DFS in patients with breast cancer to enable the identification of patients at high risk who may benefit from prevention interventions.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 559 women with breast cancer who underwent treatment between 2004 and 2022. The study endpoint was DFS. Recurrence was defined as local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastases, contralateral breast cancer, other second primary cancer, and death. Baseline tumor-related characteristics, treatment-related characteristics, sociodemographic and biochemical data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results: The median DFS was 45 months (range, 2 to 225 months). Breast cancer recurred in 86 patients (15.4%), of whom 10 had local recurrence, 10 had regional recurrence, 17 had contralateral breast cancer, 29 had distant metastases, 10 had second primary cancer, and 10 patients died. Multivariate forward stepwise Cox regression analysis showed that AJCC stage III, Ki67 ≥14%, albumin, platelet, and red cell distribution width-standard deviation (RDW-SD) were predictors of worse DFS. In addition, the effects of albumin, platelet, and RDW-SD on disease recurrence were confirmed by structural equation model (SEM) analysis.

Conclusion: In addition to the traditional predictors of worse DFS such as AJCC stage III and Ki67 ≥14%, lower pretreatment circulating albumin, higher pretreatment circulating platelet count and RDW-SD could significantly predict worse DFS in this study, and SEM delineated possible causal pathways and inter-relationships of albumin, platelet, and RDW-SD contributing to the disease recurrence among Chinese women with breast cancer.

Purpose: CD24 mediates a "don't eat me" signal to escape the immune environment. However, the correlation between CD24 and PD-L1 is unclear. This study aimed to assess if CD24 can serve as a target for immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods: Data on CD24 expression in breast cancer were acquired using the Oncomine and UALCAN tools. The role of CD24 expression on the prognosis of patients with TNBC was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Subsequently, STRING and TISIDB databases were used to construct protein-protein interaction networks and to explore immune-related molecules regulated by CD24. Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry assays were conducted to validate CD24 and PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltration lymphocyte (TIL) level. Survival analysis was also performed to explore the effect of CD24 and PD-L1 expression and TIL level in patients with TNBC. ShRNA was also used to explore the regulation role of CD24 on PD-L1 expression.

Results: CD24 expression was significantly higher in breast cancer than in normal tissues, with high expression being significantly associated with a worse prognosis. CD24 was found to be significantly regulated by chemokines, immunoinhibitors, immunostimulators and TILs. Furthermore, CD24 expression showed a significant positive correlation with PD-L1 expression and a negative correlation with TIL level. In association with PD-L1, CD24 was found to positively regulate lymphocyte costimulation, T cell costimulation, and leukocyte activation. Furthermore, CD24 and PD-L1 co-expression contributed to worse survival outcomes. In addition, CD24 expression was found to attenuate the positive effects of high-level TILs on the prognosis of patients with TNBC. CD24 can also regulate the expression of PD-L1 in TNBC cells.

Conclusion: CD24 may attenuate the positive effects of high TIL levels on survival and may facilitate the immune escape of TNBC by regulating PD-L1 expression. Thus, it is a potential target for immunotherapy in TNBC.

Purpose: Telomerase activation, a critical step in cancer progression, occurs in approximately 95% of breast cancer cases. Telomerase is an attractive therapeutic target for breast cancer owing to its unique expression pattern. GV1001, a telomerase-derived peptide, is loaded onto human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II antigen-presenting cells and binds to CD4+ T cell activating immune responses. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of co-administration of GV1001 and cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with heavily-treated metastatic breast cancer.

Patients and methods: We analyzed 63 patients with breast cancer who received both GV1001 and cytotoxic chemotherapy. The GV 1001 administration methods involves 0.56 mg intradermal injection three times during the first week, one time at weeks 2, 3, 4, and 6, and then once every 28 days. The primary endpoint of this study was quality of life according to EORTC QLO-C30 and EQ-5D, while the secondary endpoint was the antitumor response according to RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity profile.

Results: In 34 patients with HR+ breast cancer evaluable for tumor response, the disease control rate (DCR) and overall response rate (ORR) were 58.8% and 26.4%, respectively. The DCR and ORR were 66.6% and 28.5% in 21 patients with HER-2+ and 50% and 25% in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), respectively. The median progression free survival was 10.4, 8.7, and 5.6 months in HR+, HER-2+, TNBC, respectively. The overall survival was 19.7, 13.2, and 9.4 months for patients with HR+, HER-2+, and TNBC, respectively. Most patients had an improved quality of life with statistically significant differences in some variables. The patients in this study experienced no additional toxicities other than the cytotoxic chemotherapy-associated side effects.

Conclusion: GV1001 is a relatively safe anticancer vaccine for patients with heavily-treated breast cancer and can to improve the quality of life.

A novel and rapid therapeutic approach is the treatment of human breast cancer by enhancing the host's immune system. In initial findings, program death one (PD-1) and program cell death ligand one (PD-L1) showed positive results towards solid tumors, but tumor relapse and drug resistance are the major concerns. Breast cancer therapy has been transformed by the advent of immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs). Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) have exhibited enduring responses to clinical usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) like atezolizumab and pembrolizumab. Nonetheless, a notable proportion of individuals with TNBC do not experience advantages from these treatments, and there is limited comprehension of the resistance mechanisms. Another approach to overcome resistance is cancer stem cells (CSCs), as these cells are crucial for the initiation and growth of tumors in the body. Various cancer vaccines are created using stem cells (dendritic, whole cell, bacterial) and focus primarily on targeting tumor-related antigens. The ultimate objective of cancer vaccines is to immunize the patients by active artificial immunity against cancer, though. In this review, we primarily focused on existing immunotherapeutic options, immune checkpoint blockers, the latest progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs), advanced strategies to overcome resistance to ICBs, cancer stem cell antigens and molecular markers, ongoing clinical trials for BCs and cancer vaccines for breast cancer.