Pub Date : 2025-02-26DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004768
Stennie Zoet, Thomas Urgert, Anouk Veldhuis, Bert-Jan van Beijnum, Gozewijn D Laverman
Introduction: The integration of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) into clinical practice has rapidly emerged in the last decade, changing the evaluation of long-term glucose regulation in patients with diabetes. When using CGM-derived metrics to evaluate long-term glucose regulation, it is essential to determine the minimal observation period necessary for a reliable estimate. The approach of this study was to calculate mean absolute errors (MAEs) for varying window lengths, with the goal of demonstrating how the CGM observation period influences the accuracy of the estimation of 90-day glycemic control.
Research design and methods: CGM data were collected from the DIABASE cohort (ZGT hospital, The Netherlands). Trailing aggregates (TAs) were calculated for four CGM-derived metrics: time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), glucose management indicator (GMI) and glycemic variability (GV). Arbitrary MAEs for each patient were compared between the TAs of window lengths from 1 to 89 days and a reference TA of 90 days, which is assumed to reflect long-term glycemic regulation.
Results: Using 14 days of CGM data resulted in 65% of subjects having their TIR estimation being below a MAE threshold of 5%. In order to have 90% of the subjects below a TIR MAE threshold of 5%, the observation period needs to be 29 days.
Conclusions: Although there is currently no consensus on what is an acceptable MAE, this study provides insight into how MAEs of CGM-derived metrics change according to the used observation period within a population and may thus be helpful for clinical decision-making.
{"title":"Quantification of the relation between continuous glucose monitoring observation period and the estimation error in assessing long-term glucose regulation.","authors":"Stennie Zoet, Thomas Urgert, Anouk Veldhuis, Bert-Jan van Beijnum, Gozewijn D Laverman","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004768","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004768","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integration of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) into clinical practice has rapidly emerged in the last decade, changing the evaluation of long-term glucose regulation in patients with diabetes. When using CGM-derived metrics to evaluate long-term glucose regulation, it is essential to determine the minimal observation period necessary for a reliable estimate. The approach of this study was to calculate mean absolute errors (MAEs) for varying window lengths, with the goal of demonstrating how the CGM observation period influences the accuracy of the estimation of 90-day glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>CGM data were collected from the DIABASE cohort (ZGT hospital, The Netherlands). Trailing aggregates (TAs) were calculated for four CGM-derived metrics: time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), glucose management indicator (GMI) and glycemic variability (GV). Arbitrary MAEs for each patient were compared between the TAs of window lengths from 1 to 89 days and a reference TA of 90 days, which is assumed to reflect long-term glycemic regulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using 14 days of CGM data resulted in 65% of subjects having their TIR estimation being below a MAE threshold of 5%. In order to have 90% of the subjects below a TIR MAE threshold of 5%, the observation period needs to be 29 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there is currently no consensus on what is an acceptable MAE, this study provides insight into how MAEs of CGM-derived metrics change according to the used observation period within a population and may thus be helpful for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143514619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-26DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004698
Guillermo E Umpierrez, Mohammed K Ali
{"title":"Diabetes in migrant communities: a rising healthcare priority.","authors":"Guillermo E Umpierrez, Mohammed K Ali","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004698","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004698","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865790/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143514614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-24DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004524
Dulce Canha, Gloria Aguayo, Emmanuel Cosson, Patricia Vaduva, Eric Renard, Fawaz Alzaid, Fabrice Bonnet, Samy Hadjadj, Louis Potier, Bruno Vergès, Sandrine Lablanche, Pierre Yves Benhamou, Helene Hanaire, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Guy Fagherazzi
Introduction: Type 1 diabetes is burdensome, requiring complex daily management and making people more prone to emotional distress. To better detect diabetes-related distress (DD) and identify at-risk patients, we aimed to provide an in-depth characterization of DD in people with type 1 diabetes.
Research design and methods: We included adults with type 1 diabetes from the Suivi en France des personnes avec un Diabète de Type 1 cohort who filled in the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire (PAID ≥40 indicates high DD). Age and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regression models analyzed individual characteristics, clinical indicators, diabetes-related complications and psychological factors. We further analyzed DD according to six data-driven subdimensions: emotional distress, fear of complications, social distress, eating distress, management distress, and diabetes burnout.
Results: In total, 1220 participants (50.6% female, age 42 years (SD 13.9), diabetes duration 24.7 years (13.6)) had a total mean PAID score of 39.6 (21.7) and 592 (48.5%) reported high DD. Leading subdimensions of DD included fear of complications (50.1 (24.4)) and diabetes burnout (45.9 (24.5)). Females, younger age, social vulnerability, smoking, and the presence of retinopathy were positively associated with high DD (p<0.05). We observed similar DD levels across HbA1c levels and treatment modalities, including automated insulin delivery and continuous glucose monitoring use. Several psychological factors, such as anxiety/depression, poor sleep quality, and treatment burden, were strongly associated with DD (p<0.001).
Conclusions: We provide a holistic clinical phenotyping approach that enables the identification of determinants and prevalence of DD, overall and according to key DD subdimensions, in a large and diverse population. Our results underscore the importance of developing DD-targeted prevention and intervention strategies focused specifically on high-risk groups and the most impactful distress subdimensions to reduce the impact of type 1 diabetes burden.
Trial registration number: NCT04657783.
1型糖尿病负担沉重,需要复杂的日常管理,使人们更容易出现情绪困扰。为了更好地检测糖尿病相关窘迫(DD)并识别高危患者,我们旨在提供1型糖尿病患者DD的深入特征。研究设计和方法:我们纳入了来自Suivi en France des persones avec un diabetes de 1型糖尿病队列的成人1型糖尿病患者,他们填写了糖尿病问题领域问卷(PAID≥40表示DD高)。调整年龄和性别的多变量logistic回归模型分析了个体特征、临床指标、糖尿病相关并发症和心理因素。我们根据六个数据驱动的子维度进一步分析DD:情绪困扰、对并发症的恐惧、社交困扰、饮食困扰、管理困扰和糖尿病倦怠。结果:共有1220名参与者(50.6%为女性,年龄42岁(SD 13.9),糖尿病病程24.7年(13.6))的总平均PAID评分为39.6(21.7),592(48.5%)报告DD高。DD的主要亚维度包括对并发症的恐惧(50.1(24.4))和糖尿病倦怠(45.9(24.5))。女性,年轻,社会脆弱性,吸烟和视网膜病变的存在与高DD呈正相关(结论:我们提供了一个整体的临床表型方法,可以根据DD的关键亚维度,在一个庞大和多样化的人群中确定DD的决定因素和患病率。我们的研究结果强调了制定针对高危人群和最具影响力的痛苦子维度的dd预防和干预策略的重要性,以减少1型糖尿病负担的影响。试验注册号:NCT04657783。
{"title":"Clinical phenotyping of people living with type 1 diabetes according to their levels of diabetes-related distress: results from the SFDT1 cohort.","authors":"Dulce Canha, Gloria Aguayo, Emmanuel Cosson, Patricia Vaduva, Eric Renard, Fawaz Alzaid, Fabrice Bonnet, Samy Hadjadj, Louis Potier, Bruno Vergès, Sandrine Lablanche, Pierre Yves Benhamou, Helene Hanaire, Yves Reznik, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Guy Fagherazzi","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004524","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004524","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type 1 diabetes is burdensome, requiring complex daily management and making people more prone to emotional distress. To better detect diabetes-related distress (DD) and identify at-risk patients, we aimed to provide an in-depth characterization of DD in people with type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included adults with type 1 diabetes from the <i>Suivi en France des personnes avec un Diabète de Type 1</i> cohort who filled in the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire (PAID ≥40 indicates high DD). Age and sex-adjusted multivariable logistic regression models analyzed individual characteristics, clinical indicators, diabetes-related complications and psychological factors. We further analyzed DD according to six data-driven subdimensions: emotional distress, fear of complications, social distress, eating distress, management distress, and diabetes burnout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1220 participants (50.6% female, age 42 years (SD 13.9), diabetes duration 24.7 years (13.6)) had a total mean PAID score of 39.6 (21.7) and 592 (48.5%) reported high DD. Leading subdimensions of DD included fear of complications (50.1 (24.4)) and diabetes burnout (45.9 (24.5)). Females, younger age, social vulnerability, smoking, and the presence of retinopathy were positively associated with high DD (p<0.05). We observed similar DD levels across HbA1c levels and treatment modalities, including automated insulin delivery and continuous glucose monitoring use. Several psychological factors, such as anxiety/depression, poor sleep quality, and treatment burden, were strongly associated with DD (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide a holistic clinical phenotyping approach that enables the identification of determinants and prevalence of DD, overall and according to key DD subdimensions, in a large and diverse population. Our results underscore the importance of developing DD-targeted prevention and intervention strategies focused specifically on high-risk groups and the most impactful distress subdimensions to reduce the impact of type 1 diabetes burden.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04657783.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143499186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-004953
Sun H Kim, Vanita R Aroda, Ranee Chatterjee, Erin S LeBlanc, Jason Nelson, Neda Rasouli, Myrlene A Staten, Ellen M Vickery, Anastassios G Pittas, Daniel S Hsia
{"title":"Role of 2-hour plasma glucose in assessing pre-diabetes risk: insights from the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study cohort.","authors":"Sun H Kim, Vanita R Aroda, Ranee Chatterjee, Erin S LeBlanc, Jason Nelson, Neda Rasouli, Myrlene A Staten, Ellen M Vickery, Anastassios G Pittas, Daniel S Hsia","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-004953","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-004953","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082652/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143466873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004614
Yiling J Cheng, Kai McKeever Bullard, Israel Hora, Brook Belay, Fang Xu, Christopher S Holliday, Roberto Simons-Linares, Stephen R Benoit
Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective intervention to manage diabetes and obesity. The population-based incidence of MBS is unknown.
Objective: To estimate the incidence of MBS among US adults with obesity by diabetes status and selected sociodemographic characteristics.
Research design and methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample to capture MBS procedures. The National Health Interview Survey was used to establish the denominator for incidence calculations. Participants included US non-pregnant adults aged ≥18 years with obesity. The main outcome was incident MBS without previous MBS, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Procedure Codes, Diagnosis Related Group system codes, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Adjusted incidence and annual percentage change (2016-2019) were estimated using logistic regression.
Results: Among US adults with obesity, over 900 000 MBS procedures were performed in inpatient and hospital-owned ambulatory surgical centers in the USA during 2016-2020. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of MBS per 1000 adults was 5.9 (95% CI 5.4 to 6.4) for adults with diabetes and 2.0 (95% CI 1.9 to 2.1) for adults without diabetes. MBS incidence was significantly higher for women and adults with class III obesity regardless of diabetes status. The highest incidence of MBS occurred in the Northeast region. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most common MBS surgical approach.
Conclusions: Incident MBS procedures were nearly threefold higher among adults with obesity and diabetes than those with obesity but without diabetes. Continued monitoring of the trends of MBS and other treatment modalities can inform our understanding of treatment accessibility to guide prevention efforts aimed at reducing obesity and diabetes.
摘要:代谢与减肥手术(MBS)是治疗糖尿病和肥胖的有效干预手段。基于人群的MBS发病率尚不清楚。目的:通过糖尿病状况和选定的社会人口学特征估计美国肥胖成人中MBS的发病率。研究设计和方法:本横断面研究使用了2016-2020年全国住院患者样本和全国门诊手术样本的数据来捕获MBS程序。使用全国健康访谈调查来建立发生率计算的分母。参与者包括美国年龄≥18岁的未怀孕肥胖成年人。主要结果为无既往MBS的事件性MBS,定义为国际疾病分类、第十次修订程序代码、诊断相关组系统代码和现行程序术语代码。使用logistic回归估计调整后的发病率和年百分比变化(2016-2019)。结果:2016-2020年期间,在美国的住院和医院拥有的门诊手术中心,肥胖的美国成年人中进行了超过90万例MBS手术。经年龄和性别调整后的每1000名成人MBS发病率,糖尿病成人为5.9 (95% CI 5.4 - 6.4),非糖尿病成人为2.0 (95% CI 1.9 - 2.1)。无论是否患有糖尿病,患有III级肥胖的女性和成人的MBS发病率都明显较高。MBS发病率最高的地区为东北地区。套筒胃切除术是最常见的MBS手术入路。结论:肥胖和糖尿病的成年人MBS手术的发生率几乎是肥胖但没有糖尿病的成年人的三倍。持续监测MBS和其他治疗方式的趋势可以帮助我们了解治疗可及性,从而指导旨在减少肥胖和糖尿病的预防工作。
{"title":"Incidence of metabolic and bariatric surgery among US adults with obesity by diabetes status: 2016-2020.","authors":"Yiling J Cheng, Kai McKeever Bullard, Israel Hora, Brook Belay, Fang Xu, Christopher S Holliday, Roberto Simons-Linares, Stephen R Benoit","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004614","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective intervention to manage diabetes and obesity. The population-based incidence of MBS is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the incidence of MBS among US adults with obesity by diabetes status and selected sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample to capture MBS procedures. The National Health Interview Survey was used to establish the denominator for incidence calculations. Participants included US non-pregnant adults aged ≥18 years with obesity. The main outcome was incident MBS without previous MBS, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Procedure Codes, Diagnosis Related Group system codes, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Adjusted incidence and annual percentage change (2016-2019) were estimated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among US adults with obesity, over 900 000 MBS procedures were performed in inpatient and hospital-owned ambulatory surgical centers in the USA during 2016-2020. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of MBS per 1000 adults was 5.9 (95% CI 5.4 to 6.4) for adults with diabetes and 2.0 (95% CI 1.9 to 2.1) for adults without diabetes. MBS incidence was significantly higher for women and adults with class III obesity regardless of diabetes status. The highest incidence of MBS occurred in the Northeast region. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most common MBS surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incident MBS procedures were nearly threefold higher among adults with obesity and diabetes than those with obesity but without diabetes. Continued monitoring of the trends of MBS and other treatment modalities can inform our understanding of treatment accessibility to guide prevention efforts aimed at reducing obesity and diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836783/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004632
Xiangxiang Jiang, Gang Lv, Minghui Li, Jing Yuan, Z Kevin Lu
Introduction: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an essential component of diabetes management. However, the utilization of DSME remains limited in the USA. This study aimed to investigate current DSME participation among the older population and to identify comprehensive factors of DSME engagement through employing various machine learning (ML) models based on a US nationally representative survey linked to claims data.
Research design and methods: Data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey were employed, and this study included data on US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 2017 to 2019. Comprehensive variables following the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework were employed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with DSME using five common ML approaches.
Results: In our study, 37.94% of participants received DSME after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 95 variables were used and all ML models achieved accuracy scores exceeding 70%. Random forest had better predictive performance, with an accuracy of 85%. Seventy-four of 95 variables were identified as key variables. Racial/ethnic disparities in predictors for DSME were identified in this study.
Conclusions: This study identified comprehensive and critical factors associated with DSME engagement from biological, behavioral, sociocultural, and environmental domains using different ML models, as well as related racial/ethnic disparities. Aligning these findings with the DSME National Standards from the ADA would enhance the guidelines' effectiveness, promoting tailored and equal diabetes management approaches that cater to diverse races/ethnicities.
{"title":"Predicting diabetes self-management education engagement: machine learning algorithms and models.","authors":"Xiangxiang Jiang, Gang Lv, Minghui Li, Jing Yuan, Z Kevin Lu","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004632","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004632","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an essential component of diabetes management. However, the utilization of DSME remains limited in the USA. This study aimed to investigate current DSME participation among the older population and to identify comprehensive factors of DSME engagement through employing various machine learning (ML) models based on a US nationally representative survey linked to claims data.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey were employed, and this study included data on US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 2017 to 2019. Comprehensive variables following the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework were employed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with DSME using five common ML approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, 37.94% of participants received DSME after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 95 variables were used and all ML models achieved accuracy scores exceeding 70%. Random forest had better predictive performance, with an accuracy of 85%. Seventy-four of 95 variables were identified as key variables. Racial/ethnic disparities in predictors for DSME were identified in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified comprehensive and critical factors associated with DSME engagement from biological, behavioral, sociocultural, and environmental domains using different ML models, as well as related racial/ethnic disparities. Aligning these findings with the DSME National Standards from the ADA would enhance the guidelines' effectiveness, promoting tailored and equal diabetes management approaches that cater to diverse races/ethnicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836835/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004727
Yuliya Kupriyanova, Iryna Yurchenko, Pavel Bobrov, Frederik Bartels, Stefan Wierichs, Marc Jonuscheit, Benedict Korzekwa, Katsiaryna Prystupa, Martin Schön, Dania Mendez, Sandra Trenkamp, Volker Burkart, Robert Wagner, Vera Schrauwen-Hinderling, Michael Roden
Introduction: The study aimed to assess the effect of COVID-19 on hepatic lipid (HL) content, fibrosis risk, and adiposity in persons with type 2 diabetes.
Research design and methods: Participants with type 2 diabetes with a history of mild COVID-19 (n=15, age 58±12 years, body mass index 30.9±5.2 kg/m2) were examined before (baseline) and 1 year (12±2 months) after (follow-up) recovery from COVID-19. Investigations for changes in metabolic risk comprised clinical examination, fasting blood sampling and MR-based measurements. Potential changes were corrected with the time course of the respective parameters in a group of participants who did not contract COVID-19 over the same time course (n=14, 61±6 years, 30.0±4.6 kg/m2).
Results: COVID-19 resulted in a relative increase in HL content of 56% (95% CI 18%, 106%; p=0.04) measured as proton density fat fraction (HL-PDFF), corrected for the time course in the absence of COVID-19. While no changes in hepatic stiffness and volume, intramyocellular lipids, whole-body, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes as well as homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and beta-cell function were observed.
Conclusions: History of COVID-19 in persons with type 2 diabetes is associated with higher HL-PDFF after 1 year following recovery from infection.
Trial registration number: NCT01055093.
本研究旨在评估COVID-19对2型糖尿病患者肝脂质(HL)含量、纤维化风险和肥胖的影响。研究设计和方法:研究对象为2型糖尿病患者,伴有轻度COVID-19病史(n=15,年龄58±12岁,体重指数30.9±5.2 kg/m2),分别在COVID-19恢复前(基线)和恢复后1年(12±2个月)进行检查。对代谢风险变化的调查包括临床检查、空腹血液采样和基于核磁共振的测量。在同一时间内未感染COVID-19的一组参与者(n=14, 61±6年,30.0±4.6 kg/m2)中,根据各自参数的时间过程对潜在变化进行校正。结果:COVID-19导致HL含量相对增加56% (95% CI 18%, 106%;p=0.04),以质子密度脂肪分数(HL-PDFF)测量,在没有COVID-19的情况下进行时间过程校正。虽然肝脏硬度和体积没有变化,但观察到细胞内脂质、全身、皮下和内脏脂肪组织体积以及胰岛素抵抗和β细胞功能的稳态模型评估。结论:2型糖尿病患者的COVID-19病史与感染恢复1年后较高的HL-PDFF相关。试验注册号:NCT01055093。
{"title":"Alterations of hepatic lipid content following COVID-19 in persons with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Yuliya Kupriyanova, Iryna Yurchenko, Pavel Bobrov, Frederik Bartels, Stefan Wierichs, Marc Jonuscheit, Benedict Korzekwa, Katsiaryna Prystupa, Martin Schön, Dania Mendez, Sandra Trenkamp, Volker Burkart, Robert Wagner, Vera Schrauwen-Hinderling, Michael Roden","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004727","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004727","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to assess the effect of COVID-19 on hepatic lipid (HL) content, fibrosis risk, and adiposity in persons with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Participants with type 2 diabetes with a history of mild COVID-19 (n=15, age 58±12 years, body mass index 30.9±5.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were examined before (baseline) and 1 year (12±2 months) after (follow-up) recovery from COVID-19. Investigations for changes in metabolic risk comprised clinical examination, fasting blood sampling and MR-based measurements. Potential changes were corrected with the time course of the respective parameters in a group of participants who did not contract COVID-19 over the same time course (n=14, 61±6 years, 30.0±4.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COVID-19 resulted in a relative increase in HL content of 56% (95% CI 18%, 106%; p=0.04) measured as proton density fat fraction (HL-PDFF), corrected for the time course in the absence of COVID-19. While no changes in hepatic stiffness and volume, intramyocellular lipids, whole-body, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes as well as homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and beta-cell function were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>History of COVID-19 in persons with type 2 diabetes is associated with higher HL-PDFF after 1 year following recovery from infection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT01055093.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836859/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004396
Maria C Spagnuolo, Pascal Gottmann, Jana Sommer, Sandra Olivia Borgmann, Klaus Strassburger, Wolfgang Rathmann, Oana Patricia Zaharia, Sandra Trenkamp, Robert Wagner, Andrea Icks, Christian Herder, Michael Roden, Haifa Maalmi
Depression is associated with diabetes, but the underlying causes remain unclear. To better understand depression in diabetes, this study investigated associations between 135 inflammatory and neurological protein biomarkers and depressive symptoms in individuals with diabetes.This cross-sectional study included 430 adults with a known diabetes duration <1 year from the German Diabetes Study (GDS), in whom biomarkers were measured in serum and depressive symptoms were evaluated at baseline and annually over 5 years using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Based on the information on depressive symptoms from the baseline and follow-up visits (n=305, ≥3 time points), we subdivided the sample into individuals with persistent or recurrent and transient or never depressive symptoms. We assessed the associations of each biomarker with baseline CES-D score (continuous) and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms using multiple linear and logistic regression models, respectively.After adjustment for covariates, we identified a three-protein signature associated with baseline CES-D score and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms. CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1) and NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-2 (SIRT2) were positively associated with baseline (β 1.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 2.29); β 0.89 (95% CI 0.06 to 1.72)), respectively) and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms (OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.31); OR 1.32 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.71), respectively), whereas leptin receptor (LEPR) was inversely associated with baseline (β -0.99 (95% CI -1.87 to -0.11)) and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms (OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.99)). However, results were not significant after adjustment for multiple testing.In conclusion, the three-protein signature identified may provide insights into mechanisms underlying depressive symptoms in diabetes and might open new therapeutic avenues.The trial registration number of the study is NCT01055093.
{"title":"Three-protein signature is associated with baseline and persistently elevated or recurrent depressive symptoms in individuals with recent-onset diabetes.","authors":"Maria C Spagnuolo, Pascal Gottmann, Jana Sommer, Sandra Olivia Borgmann, Klaus Strassburger, Wolfgang Rathmann, Oana Patricia Zaharia, Sandra Trenkamp, Robert Wagner, Andrea Icks, Christian Herder, Michael Roden, Haifa Maalmi","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004396","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression is associated with diabetes, but the underlying causes remain unclear. To better understand depression in diabetes, this study investigated associations between 135 inflammatory and neurological protein biomarkers and depressive symptoms in individuals with diabetes.This cross-sectional study included 430 adults with a known diabetes duration <1 year from the German Diabetes Study (GDS), in whom biomarkers were measured in serum and depressive symptoms were evaluated at baseline and annually over 5 years using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Based on the information on depressive symptoms from the baseline and follow-up visits (n=305, ≥3 time points), we subdivided the sample into individuals with persistent or recurrent and transient or never depressive symptoms. We assessed the associations of each biomarker with baseline CES-D score (continuous) and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms using multiple linear and logistic regression models, respectively.After adjustment for covariates, we identified a three-protein signature associated with baseline CES-D score and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms. CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1) and NAD-dependent protein deacetylase sirtuin-2 (SIRT2) were positively associated with baseline (β 1.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 2.29); β 0.89 (95% CI 0.06 to 1.72)), respectively) and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms (OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.31); OR 1.32 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.71), respectively), whereas leptin receptor (LEPR) was inversely associated with baseline (β -0.99 (95% CI -1.87 to -0.11)) and persistent/recurrent depressive symptoms (OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.99)). However, results were not significant after adjustment for multiple testing.In conclusion, the three-protein signature identified may provide insights into mechanisms underlying depressive symptoms in diabetes and might open new therapeutic avenues.The trial registration number of the study is NCT01055093.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-16DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004505
Aida Simeunovic, Cathrine Brunborg, Martin Heier, Tore Julsrud Berg, Knut Dahl-Jorgensen, Hanna Dis Margeirsdottir
Introduction: The risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in individuals with type 1 diabetes, despite good glycemic control. This study aims to evaluate early signs of atherosclerosis and predisposing factors in individuals with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes compared with healthy controls.
Research design and methods: The Atherosclerosis and Childhood Diabetes study is a prospective population-based cohort study with follow-up every fifth year. The cohort consists of 329 subjects with type 1 diabetes and 173 controls. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) was measured at baseline and 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Data from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry were used in assessment of traditional risk factors.
Results: Mean cIMT in young women with type 1 diabetes increased significantly over a 10-year period compared with healthy controls (∆0.019 mm (0.001-0.035), p=0.035). At the 10-year follow-up the group with type 1 diabetes had a mean age of 24.2±2.9 years (13.7±2.8 years at baseline), diabetes duration of 15.6±3.4 years (5.4±3.3 years at baseline) and HbA1c of 8.2±3.6% (66±16 mmol/mol) (8.4±3.4% (68±13 mmol/mol) at baseline). Women with type 1 diabetes had significantly higher mean weight, body mass index, waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, while men with type 1 diabetes had significantly higher mean DBP and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio compared with the control group. Mean cIMT change over time was not associated with long-term HbA1c or LDL-cholesterol burden in childhood and adolescence.
Conclusion: Young women with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes of relatively short diabetes duration had a higher mean cIMT over a 10-year period compared with their healthy female controls, with values similar to males.
导论:1型糖尿病患者的心血管疾病风险增加,尽管血糖控制良好。本研究旨在评估儿童期发病的1型糖尿病患者与健康对照者的动脉粥样硬化早期症状和易感因素。研究设计和方法:动脉粥样硬化与儿童糖尿病研究是一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,每五年随访一次。该队列包括329名1型糖尿病患者和173名对照组。在基线和5年和10年随访时测量颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(cIMT)。来自挪威儿童糖尿病登记处的数据被用于评估传统的危险因素。结果:与健康对照组相比,年轻1型糖尿病女性患者的平均cIMT在10年期间显著增加(∆0.019 mm (0.001-0.035), p=0.035)。在10年的随访中,1型糖尿病组的平均年龄为24.2±2.9岁(基线为13.7±2.8岁),糖尿病病程为15.6±3.4年(基线为5.4±3.3年),HbA1c为8.2±3.6%(66±16 mmol/mol)(基线为8.4±3.4%(68±13 mmol/mol))。1型糖尿病女性患者的平均体重、体重指数、腰围、舒张压(DBP)、血清低密度脂蛋白(LDL)-胆固醇和载脂蛋白B显著高于对照组,而1型糖尿病男性患者的平均DBP和尿白蛋白-肌酐比显著高于对照组。平均cIMT随时间的变化与儿童期和青春期长期HbA1c或ldl -胆固醇负担无关。结论:与健康女性对照组相比,儿童期发病的1型糖尿病病程相对较短的年轻女性在10年期间的平均cIMT较高,其值与男性相似。
{"title":"Early increase in carotid intima-media thickness in women with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes compared with healthy peers: the Norwegian Atherosclerosis and Childhood Diabetes study.","authors":"Aida Simeunovic, Cathrine Brunborg, Martin Heier, Tore Julsrud Berg, Knut Dahl-Jorgensen, Hanna Dis Margeirsdottir","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004505","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004505","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in individuals with type 1 diabetes, despite good glycemic control. This study aims to evaluate early signs of atherosclerosis and predisposing factors in individuals with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes compared with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The Atherosclerosis and Childhood Diabetes study is a prospective population-based cohort study with follow-up every fifth year. The cohort consists of 329 subjects with type 1 diabetes and 173 controls. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) was measured at baseline and 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Data from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry were used in assessment of traditional risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean cIMT in young women with type 1 diabetes increased significantly over a 10-year period compared with healthy controls (∆0.019 mm (0.001-0.035), p=0.035). At the 10-year follow-up the group with type 1 diabetes had a mean age of 24.2±2.9 years (13.7±2.8 years at baseline), diabetes duration of 15.6±3.4 years (5.4±3.3 years at baseline) and HbA1c of 8.2±3.6% (66±16 mmol/mol) (8.4±3.4% (68±13 mmol/mol) at baseline). Women with type 1 diabetes had significantly higher mean weight, body mass index, waist circumference, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, while men with type 1 diabetes had significantly higher mean DBP and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio compared with the control group. Mean cIMT change over time was not associated with long-term HbA1c or LDL-cholesterol burden in childhood and adolescence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Young women with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes of relatively short diabetes duration had a higher mean cIMT over a 10-year period compared with their healthy female controls, with values similar to males.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831298/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143432661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-04DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004536
Samuel Soff, Yun Jae Yoo, Carolyn Bramante, Jane E B Reusch, Jared Davis Huling, Margaret A Hall, Daniel Brannock, Til Sturmer, Zachary Butzin-Dozier, Rachel Wong, Richard Moffitt
Introduction: Elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in individuals with type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and death after acute COVID-19, however the effect of HbA1c on Long COVID is unclear.
Objective: Evaluate the association of glycemic control with the development of Long COVID in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative. Our cohort included individuals with T2D from eight sites with longitudinal natural language processing (NLP) data. The primary outcome was death or new-onset recurrent Long COVID symptoms within 30-180 days after COVID-19. Symptoms were identified as keywords from clinical notes using NLP in respiratory, brain fog, fatigue, loss of smell/taste, cough, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal symptom categories. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk of Long COVID by HbA1c range, adjusting for demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, and diabetes medication. A COVID-negative group was used as a control.
Results: Among 7430 COVID-positive patients, 1491 (20.1%) developed symptomatic Long COVID, and 380 (5.1%) died. The primary outcome of death or Long COVID was increased in patients with HbA1c 8% to <10% (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.41) and ≥10% (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.72) compared with those with HbA1c 6.5% to <8%. This association was not seen in the COVID-negative group. Higher HbA1c levels were associated with increased risk of Long COVID symptoms, especially respiratory and brain fog. There was no association between HbA1c levels and risk of death within 30-180 days following COVID-19. NLP identified more patients with Long COVID symptoms compared with diagnosis codes.
Conclusion: Poor glycemic control (HbA1c≥8%) in people with T2D was associated with higher risk of Long COVID symptoms 30-180 days following COVID-19. Notably, this risk increased as HbA1c levels rose. However, this association was not observed in patients with T2D without a history of COVID-19. An NLP-based definition of Long COVID identified more patients than diagnosis codes and should be considered in future studies.
{"title":"Association of glycemic control with Long COVID in patients with type 2 diabetes: findings from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).","authors":"Samuel Soff, Yun Jae Yoo, Carolyn Bramante, Jane E B Reusch, Jared Davis Huling, Margaret A Hall, Daniel Brannock, Til Sturmer, Zachary Butzin-Dozier, Rachel Wong, Richard Moffitt","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004536","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004536","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in individuals with type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and death after acute COVID-19, however the effect of HbA1c on Long COVID is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the association of glycemic control with the development of Long COVID in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative. Our cohort included individuals with T2D from eight sites with longitudinal natural language processing (NLP) data. The primary outcome was death or new-onset recurrent Long COVID symptoms within 30-180 days after COVID-19. Symptoms were identified as keywords from clinical notes using NLP in respiratory, brain fog, fatigue, loss of smell/taste, cough, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal symptom categories. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk of Long COVID by HbA1c range, adjusting for demographics, body mass index, comorbidities, and diabetes medication. A COVID-negative group was used as a control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7430 COVID-positive patients, 1491 (20.1%) developed symptomatic Long COVID, and 380 (5.1%) died. The primary outcome of death or Long COVID was increased in patients with HbA1c 8% to <10% (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.41) and ≥10% (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.72) compared with those with HbA1c 6.5% to <8%. This association was not seen in the COVID-negative group. Higher HbA1c levels were associated with increased risk of Long COVID symptoms, especially respiratory and brain fog. There was no association between HbA1c levels and risk of death within 30-180 days following COVID-19. NLP identified more patients with Long COVID symptoms compared with diagnosis codes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poor glycemic control (HbA1c≥8%) in people with T2D was associated with higher risk of Long COVID symptoms 30-180 days following COVID-19. Notably, this risk increased as HbA1c levels rose. However, this association was not observed in patients with T2D without a history of COVID-19. An NLP-based definition of Long COVID identified more patients than diagnosis codes and should be considered in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795369/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143188364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}