Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.001
H. Joachim Deeg
Hematopoietic cell transplantation generates new individuals, transplant chimeras, composed of 2 genetic partners—the patient and donor-derived cells—no longer restricted by their original genomes. Interactions of donor-derived and recipient cells occur prominently at the boundary of the recipient with a third partner, the microbiome, in particular skin and intestinal tract, leading to disruption of microbiome homeostasis. These interactions of donor and patient cells at the boundary set the stage for the development of graft-versus-host disease, an expression of the defense of individuality by recipient and donor. Establishment of tolerance and return of homeostasis at the boundary will allow for the survival of the new integrated, physiologic individual.
{"title":"Individuals, Boundaries, and Graft-versus-Host Disease","authors":"H. Joachim Deeg","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hematopoietic cell transplantation generates new individuals, transplant chimeras, composed of 2 genetic partners—the patient and donor-derived cells—no longer restricted by their original genomes. Interactions of donor-derived and recipient cells occur prominently at the boundary of the recipient with a third partner, the microbiome, in particular skin and intestinal tract, leading to disruption of microbiome homeostasis. These interactions of donor and patient cells at the boundary set the stage for the development of graft-versus-host disease, an expression of the defense of individuality by recipient and donor. Establishment of tolerance and return of homeostasis at the boundary will allow for the survival of the new integrated, physiologic individual.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38477308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.016
Galen E. Switzer , Jessica G. Bruce , Deidre M. Kiefer , Hati Kobusingye , Kaleab Z. Abebe , Rebecca Drexler , RaeAnne M. Besser , Dennis L. Confer , Mary M. Horowitz , Roberta J. King , Bronwen E. Shaw , Marcie Riches , Brandon Hayes-Lattin , Michael Linenberger , Brian Bolwell , Scott D. Rowley , Mark R. Litzow , Michael A. Pulsipher
Multiple investigations have documented the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and donation-related experiences of unrelated donors (URDs), but similar investigations of the related donor (RD) experience have been less common. The central goal of this study was to longitudinally examine and compare HRQoL of RD and URD hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors from predonation through 1 year postdonation. This prospective investigation included adult HSC donors ages 18 to 60 years who donated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells at one of 48 geographically diverse US transplant/donor centers and completed HRQoL interviews at predonation and 4 weeks and 1 year postdonation. At predonation, related donors were less ambivalent about donation (t = –3.30; P = .001), more satisfied with their decision to donate (t = 2.65; P = .009), and more likely to define themselves as donors (t = 2.94; P = .004) than were URDs. However, related donors were more concerned about the use of needles (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19; P = .012), about who would pay for the procedure (OR = 2.80; P = .011), and the possibility that they would feel responsible if the transplant failed (t = 2.31; P = .022). Shortly postdonation, related donors were more likely to report donation-related pain (t = 2.50; P = .013) and lightheadedness (OR = 3.63; P = .028). At 1 year postdonation, related donors were less likely to be fully recovered from donation (OR = 0.10; P = .010) and more likely to report a longer recovery period following donation (t = 2.57; P = .011), although this latter finding was primarily due to the percentage of related versus unrelated donors not fully recovered at 1 year postdonation (10% versus 1%). Taken together, these findings suggest that current related donor management practices may be sufficient in preparing related donors for the psychological aspects of donation but that there may be more to do in terms of calibrating the description of donation-related experiences and recovery time to the related donor group (i.e., descriptions of donation experiences based on unrelated donation may not provide best estimates of experience for this group).
{"title":"Health-Related Quality-of-Life Comparison of Adult Related and Unrelated HSC Donors: An RDSafe Study","authors":"Galen E. Switzer , Jessica G. Bruce , Deidre M. Kiefer , Hati Kobusingye , Kaleab Z. Abebe , Rebecca Drexler , RaeAnne M. Besser , Dennis L. Confer , Mary M. Horowitz , Roberta J. King , Bronwen E. Shaw , Marcie Riches , Brandon Hayes-Lattin , Michael Linenberger , Brian Bolwell , Scott D. Rowley , Mark R. Litzow , Michael A. Pulsipher","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiple investigations have documented the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and donation-related experiences of unrelated donors (URDs), but similar investigations of the related donor (RD) experience have been less common. The central goal of this study was to longitudinally examine and compare HRQoL of RD and URD hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors from predonation through 1 year postdonation. This prospective investigation included adult HSC donors ages 18 to 60 years who donated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells at one of 48 geographically diverse US transplant/donor centers and completed HRQoL interviews at predonation and 4 weeks and 1 year postdonation. At predonation, related donors were less ambivalent about donation (<em>t</em> = –3.30; <em>P</em> = .001), more satisfied with their decision to donate (<em>t</em> = 2.65; <em>P</em> = .009), and more likely to define themselves as donors (<em>t</em> = 2.94; <em>P</em> = .004) than were URDs. However, related donors were more concerned about the use of needles (odds ratio [OR] = 2.19; <em>P</em> = .012), about who would pay for the procedure (OR = 2.80; <em>P</em> = .011), and the possibility that they would feel responsible if the transplant failed (<em>t</em> = 2.31; <em>P</em> = .022). Shortly postdonation, related donors were more likely to report donation-related pain (<em>t</em> = 2.50; <em>P</em> = .013) and lightheadedness (OR = 3.63; <em>P</em> = .028). At 1 year postdonation, related donors were less likely to be fully recovered from donation (OR = 0.10; <em>P</em> = .010) and more likely to report a longer recovery period following donation (<em>t</em> = 2.57; <em>P</em> = .011), although this latter finding was primarily due to the percentage of related versus unrelated donors not fully recovered at 1 year postdonation (10% versus 1%). Taken together, these findings suggest that current related donor management practices may be sufficient in preparing related donors for the psychological aspects of donation but that there may be more to do in terms of calibrating the description of donation-related experiences and recovery time to the related donor group (i.e., descriptions of donation experiences based on unrelated donation may not provide best estimates of experience for this group).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38292465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.006
Isik Kaygusuz Atagunduz , Maximilian Christopeit , Francis Ayuk , Gaby Zeck , Christine Wolschke , Nicolaus Kröger
In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively evaluated the files of 227 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2015 for relapse later than 5 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). A total of 94 patients who were alive and in remission at 5 years were identified with follow-up of at least 5 years (median, 9.15 years) after SCT. Thirteen patients (14%) experienced late molecular (n = 6) or hematologic (n = 7) relapse at a median of 7.1 years while 81 patients did not experience relapse. Relapse patients received either donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (n = 7) and/or second transplantation (n = 4). Of those, 72.7% achieved again full donor cell chimerism and molecular remission, and after a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year overall survival rates for patients with or without relapse were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 100%) and 98.8% (95% CI, 96% to 100%), respectively (P = .13). We conclude that late relapse occurs in about 14% of the patients and the majority can be successfully salvaged with DLI and/or second allograft. All patients with molecular relapse are alive and support the long-time molecular monitoring in myelofibrosis patients after allogeneic SCT.
{"title":"Incidence and Outcome of Late Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis","authors":"Isik Kaygusuz Atagunduz , Maximilian Christopeit , Francis Ayuk , Gaby Zeck , Christine Wolschke , Nicolaus Kröger","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively evaluated the files of 227 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2015 for relapse later than 5 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). A total of 94 patients who were alive and in remission at 5 years were identified with follow-up of at least 5 years (median, 9.15 years) after SCT. Thirteen patients (14%) experienced late molecular (n = 6) or hematologic (n = 7) relapse at a median of 7.1 years while 81 patients did not experience relapse. Relapse patients received either donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (n = 7) and/or second transplantation (n = 4). Of those, 72.7% achieved again full donor cell chimerism and molecular remission, and after a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year overall survival rates for patients with or without relapse were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 100%) and 98.8% (95% CI, 96% to 100%), respectively (<em>P</em> = .13). We conclude that late relapse occurs in about 14% of the patients and the majority can be successfully salvaged with DLI and/or second allograft. All patients with molecular relapse are alive and support the long-time molecular monitoring in myelofibrosis patients after allogeneic SCT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38397750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.021
Maryam Behfar , Mohammad Babaei , Amir Reza Radmard , Soheil Kooraki , Hamid Farajifard , Parisa Naji , Sahar Taebi , Amir Ali Hamidieh
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is one of the most common neurologic complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical, and imaging features of PRES in pediatric patients with Fanconi anemia (FA) following HSCT. This prospective study included all post-HSCT patients with underlying FA disease between 2014 and 2017. Brain computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in all individuals who developed neurologic symptoms. PRES was diagnosed based on clinic-radiological evidence. Follow-up MRI was performed in all patients with PRES within two months. Forty-one patients with FA (28 males; mean age, 8.19 ± 3.25 years) were enrolled. Out of 15 patients with acute neurologic symptoms, PRES was diagnosed in 9 individuals (21.95% of the total cohort). The occurrence of PRES was significantly higher in patients who had a donor with a 1-locus mismatch (P= .02). Donor relation, stem cell source, and graft-versus-host disease grade did not have any significant association with the development of PRES. MRI showed asymmetric vasogenic edema in 5 patients, an overt infarct in 1 patient, and foci of microhemorrhages in 3 patients, 1 of whom developed a hemorrhagic infarct. This patient died shortly, and persistent microhemorrhages were noted in the other 2 patients. Our findings demonstrate a greater risk of developing PRES after HSCT in patients with FA compared with those with other diseases (21.95% versus 1% to 10%), and in contrast to its term, it might be irreversible and has adverse effects on HSCT outcomes. The increased vascular and endothelial fragility in FA may contribute to the higher frequency of PRES in these individuals.
{"title":"Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients with Fanconi Anemia, a Prospective Study","authors":"Maryam Behfar , Mohammad Babaei , Amir Reza Radmard , Soheil Kooraki , Hamid Farajifard , Parisa Naji , Sahar Taebi , Amir Ali Hamidieh","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is one of the most common neurologic complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical, and imaging features of PRES in pediatric patients with Fanconi anemia (FA) following HSCT. This prospective study included all post-HSCT patients with underlying FA disease between 2014 and 2017. Brain computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in all individuals who developed neurologic symptoms. PRES was diagnosed based on clinic-radiological evidence. Follow-up MRI was performed in all patients with PRES within two months. Forty-one patients with FA (28 males; mean age, 8.19 ± 3.25 years) were enrolled. Out of 15 patients with acute neurologic symptoms, PRES was diagnosed in 9 individuals (21.95% of the total cohort). The occurrence of PRES was significantly higher in patients who had a donor with a 1-locus mismatch (<em>P</em>= .02). Donor relation, stem cell source, and graft-versus-host disease grade did not have any significant association with the development of PRES. MRI showed asymmetric vasogenic edema in 5 patients, an overt infarct in 1 patient, and foci of microhemorrhages in 3 patients, 1 of whom developed a hemorrhagic infarct. This patient died shortly, and persistent microhemorrhages were noted in the other 2 patients. Our findings demonstrate a greater risk of developing PRES after HSCT in patients with FA compared with those with other diseases (21.95% versus 1% to 10%), and in contrast to its term, it might be irreversible and has adverse effects on HSCT outcomes. The increased vascular and endothelial fragility in FA may contribute to the higher frequency of PRES in these individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38323567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.027
Karamjeet S. Sandhu, Sanjeet Dadwal, Dongyun Yang, Matthew Mei, Joycelynne Palmer, Amandeep Salhotra, Monzr Al Malki, Ahmed Aribi, Haris Ali, Samer Khaled, Stephen J. Forman, David Snyder, Ryotaro Nakamura, Anthony S. Stein, Guido Marcucci, Ibrahim Aldoss, Vinod Pullarkat
The combination of hypomethylating agents with the selective Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (HMA-VEN) has emerged as a highly active regimen in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in both the upfront and relapsed/refractory (r/r) settings. We report our early experience with a cohort of patients who were able to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) after HMA-VEN therapy. Thirty-two patients with AML (19 r/r and 13 de novo) with a median age of 62 years underwent alloHCT after HMA-VEN therapy. Twenty-two (68.8%) were in complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery at time of HCT. With a median follow up of 14.4 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 62.5%, and disease-free survival was 43.8%. The 1-year nonrelapse mortality rate was 18.8%, and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 37.5%. Among patients who underwent alloHCT in CR, the 1-year OS was 77.3%, and the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 9.1%. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 43.8%. We conclude that alloHCT after HMA-VEN is therapy associated with favorable allogeneic HCT outcomes in newly diagnosed older patients with AML, as well as those with r/r AML.
{"title":"Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation after Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agent Therapy for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia","authors":"Karamjeet S. Sandhu, Sanjeet Dadwal, Dongyun Yang, Matthew Mei, Joycelynne Palmer, Amandeep Salhotra, Monzr Al Malki, Ahmed Aribi, Haris Ali, Samer Khaled, Stephen J. Forman, David Snyder, Ryotaro Nakamura, Anthony S. Stein, Guido Marcucci, Ibrahim Aldoss, Vinod Pullarkat","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.027","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.027","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The combination of hypomethylating agents with the selective Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (HMA-VEN) has emerged as a highly active regimen in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in both the upfront and relapsed/refractory (r/r) settings. We report our early experience with a cohort of patients who were able to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) after HMA-VEN therapy. Thirty-two patients with AML (19 r/r and 13 de novo) with a median age of 62 years underwent alloHCT after HMA-VEN therapy. Twenty-two (68.8%) were in complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery at time of HCT. With a median follow up of 14.4 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 62.5%, and disease-free survival was 43.8%. The 1-year nonrelapse mortality rate was 18.8%, and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 37.5%. Among patients who underwent alloHCT in CR, the 1-year OS was 77.3%, and the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 9.1%. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 43.8%. We conclude that alloHCT after HMA-VEN is therapy associated with favorable allogeneic HCT outcomes in newly diagnosed older patients with AML, as well as those with r/r AML.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.027","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38327387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.021
Ghada Algwaiz , Mahmoud Aljurf , Mickey Koh , Mary M. Horowitz , Per Ljungman , Daniel Weisdorf , Wael Saber , Yoshihisa Kodera , Jeff Szer , Dunia Jawdat , William A. Wood , Ruta Brazauskas , Leslie Lehmann , Marcelo C. Pasquini , Adriana Seber , Pei Hua Lu , Yoshiko Atsuta , Marcie Riches , Miguel-Angel Perales , Nina Worel , Shahrukh K. Hashmi
The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has impacted many facets of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in both developed and developing countries. Realizing the challenges as a result of this pandemic affecting the daily practice of the HCT centers and the recognition of the variability in practice worldwide, the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research's (CIBMTR) Health Services and International Studies Committee have jointly produced an expert opinion statement as a general guide to deal with certain aspects of HCT, including diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 in HCT recipient, pre- and post-HCT management, donor issues, medical tourism, and facilities management. During these crucial times, which may last for months or years, the HCT community must reorganize to proceed with transplantation activity in those patients who urgently require it, albeit with extreme caution. This shared knowledge may be of value to the HCT community in the absence of high-quality evidence-based medicine.
Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the key strategy to cure patients with mature T and natural killer (NK) cell lymphomas/leukemia, especially those with relapsed/refractory diseases, there is no consensus strategy for donor selection. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of allo-HSCT in 111 patients in 15 Japanese institutions as a multi-institutional joint research project. Thirty-nine patients received bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from related donors (rBMT/rPBSCT), 37 received BMT/PBSCT from unrelated donors (uBMT/uPBSCT), and 35 received cord blood transplantation (CBT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 years were 42% and 34%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were 43% and 25%. In multivariate analysis, CBT showed comparable OS with rBMT/rPBSCT (rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; P = .264) and better OS compared with uBMT/uPBSCT (HR, 2.99; P = .010), with a trend toward a lower relapse rate (rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 2.60; P = .010; uBMT/uPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 2.05; P = .082). This superiority of CBT was more definite in on-disease patients (OS: rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 5.52; P = .021; uBMT/uPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 6.80; P = .007). Better disease control was also strongly associated with better OS and PFS with lower relapse rate. In conclusion, allo-HSCT is beneficial for the survival of patients with mature T and NK cell lymphomas/leukemia if performed in a timely fashion. Since CBT showed favorable survival with a lower relapse risk, it could be a preferred alternative, especially in on-disease patients.
{"title":"Impact of Donor Source on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Mature T Cell and Natural Killer Cell Neoplasms in the Kyoto Stem Cell Transplantation Group","authors":"Mizuki Watanabe , Junya Kanda , Yasuyuki Arai , Masakatsu Hishizawa , Momoko Nishikori , Takayuki Ishikawa , Kazunori Imada , Yasunori Ueda , Takashi Akasaka , Akihito Yonezawa , Masaharu Nohgawa , Toshiyuki Kitano , Mitsuru Itoh , Tomoharu Takeoka , Toshinori Moriguchi , Kazuhiro Yago , Nobuyoshi Arima , Naoyuki Anzai , Mitsumasa Watanabe , Tadakazu Kondo , Akifumi Takaori-Kondo","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.032","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the key strategy to cure patients with mature T and natural killer (NK) cell lymphomas/leukemia, especially those with relapsed/refractory diseases, there is no consensus strategy for donor selection. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of allo-HSCT in 111 patients in 15 Japanese institutions as a multi-institutional joint research project. Thirty-nine patients received bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from related donors (rBMT/rPBSCT), 37 received BMT/PBSCT from unrelated donors (uBMT/uPBSCT), and 35 received cord blood transplantation (CBT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 years were 42% and 34%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were 43% and 25%. In multivariate analysis, CBT showed comparable OS with rBMT/rPBSCT (rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; <em>P</em> = .264) and better OS compared with uBMT/uPBSCT (HR, 2.99; <em>P</em> = .010), with a trend toward a lower relapse rate (rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 2.60; <em>P</em> = .010; uBMT/uPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 2.05; <em>P</em> = .082). This superiority of CBT was more definite in on-disease patients (OS: rBMT/rPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 5.52; <em>P</em> = .021; uBMT/uPBSCT versus CBT: HR, 6.80; <em>P</em> = .007). Better disease control was also strongly associated with better OS and PFS with lower relapse rate. In conclusion, allo-HSCT is beneficial for the survival of patients with mature T and NK cell lymphomas/leukemia if performed in a timely fashion. Since CBT showed favorable survival with a lower relapse risk, it could be a preferred alternative, especially in on-disease patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.07.032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38224691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/S1083-8791(20)30703-5
{"title":"Masthead (Purpose and Scope)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1083-8791(20)30703-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-8791(20)30703-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1083-8791(20)30703-5","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136815785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.003
Samer A. Srour, Uday R. Popat
{"title":"Impact of Mixed Chimerism on Myelofibrosis Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation","authors":"Samer A. Srour, Uday R. Popat","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.09.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38397749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.036
Avirup Guha , Daniel Addison , Prantesh Jain , Jahir M. Gutierrez , Arjun Ghosh , Claire Roddie , Marcos de Lima , Sadeer Al-Kindi , Guilherme H. Oliveira
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is approved in the United States for the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia and aggressive B cell lymphomas. Multiple cardiovascular adverse events (CVEs) associated with CAR-Ts have been observed in small studies, but no large-scale studies exist. Leveraging the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), we identified all reported adverse events (AEs) associated with CAR-T therapy (tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel) from 2017 to 2019. Reports with missing age and sex were excluded. CVEs were classified into arrhythmias, heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), and other CVEs. Logistic regression and hierarchical clustering were used to identify factors associated with CVEs. A total of 996 reported AEs were observed (39.1% associated with tisagenlecleucel and 60% with axicabtagene ciloleucel). Of all patients experiencing AEs, the median age was 54 (interquartile range, 21 to 65) years; 38.9% were females. In total, 19.7% (196) of all AEs reported to the FDA were CVEs. The most common CVEs were arrhythmia (77.6%), followed by HF (14.3%) and MI (0.5%). In adjusted analysis a positive association was observed between those presenting with CVE with neurotoxicity (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.60; P = .004). Additionally, when both CVE and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) are present, neurotoxicity is the most common noncardiac AE, which clusters with them (Jaccard similarity: 73.1). The mortality rate was 21.1% overall but 30.1% for those reporting CVEs. In FAERS, reported CVEs with CAR-T are associated with high reported mortality. The development of either CRS or neurotoxicity should prompt vigilance for cardiovascular events.
{"title":"Cardiovascular Events Associated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: Cross-Sectional FDA Adverse Events Reporting System Analysis","authors":"Avirup Guha , Daniel Addison , Prantesh Jain , Jahir M. Gutierrez , Arjun Ghosh , Claire Roddie , Marcos de Lima , Sadeer Al-Kindi , Guilherme H. Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.036","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.036","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is approved in the United States for the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia and aggressive B cell lymphomas. Multiple cardiovascular adverse events (CVEs) associated with CAR-Ts have been observed in small studies, but no large-scale studies exist. Leveraging the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS), we identified all reported adverse events (AEs) associated with CAR-T therapy (tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel) from 2017 to 2019. Reports with missing age and sex were excluded. CVEs were classified into arrhythmias, heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), and other CVEs. Logistic regression and hierarchical clustering were used to identify factors associated with CVEs. A total of 996 reported AEs were observed (39.1% associated with tisagenlecleucel and 60% with axicabtagene ciloleucel). Of all patients experiencing AEs, the median age was 54 (interquartile range, 21 to 65) years; 38.9% were females. In total, 19.7% (196) of all AEs reported to the FDA were CVEs. The most common CVEs were arrhythmia (77.6%), followed by HF (14.3%) and MI (0.5%). In adjusted analysis a positive association was observed between those presenting with CVE with neurotoxicity (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 2.60; <em>P</em> = .004). Additionally, when both CVE and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) are present, neurotoxicity is the most common noncardiac AE, which clusters with them (Jaccard similarity: 73.1). The mortality rate was 21.1% overall but 30.1% for those reporting CVEs. In FAERS, reported CVEs with CAR-T are associated with high reported mortality. The development of either CRS or neurotoxicity should prompt vigilance for cardiovascular events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9165,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38414129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}