Journal of early hearing detection and intervention最新文献

The purpose of this study was to describe private insurance reimbursements for newborn hearing screening (NBHS) in the United States. Data from the MarketScan® Commercial Databases were used to estimate itemized reimbursements for privately insured infants born between January 1, 2013-December 31, 2014. Estimates were based on billed claims for hearing screening services during infancy among 456,407 infants with birth hospitalization claims (71,820 infants with inpatient NBHS and 1,104 infants with outpatient NBHS). The median reimbursement for NBHS was almost three times greater when performed in an inpatient setting than outpatient setting. Median reimbursement for NBHS performed in a hospital and billed as inpatient service was $148.00 (interquartile range [IQR] $99.52-$210.00) and $57.53 (IQR $34.40-$120.91) when billed as an outpatient service. The mean reimbursement for NBHS performed in an outpatient hospital setting was $136.48 (IQR $86.08-$220.15) and $41.60 (IQR $28.15-$57.52) for NBHS billed in conjunction with an office visit (e.g., performed in an audiology clinic, an audiologist's office, or physician's office during a routine check-up). No NBHS claims were filed for 84.3% of infants (384,587‬/456,407), as NBHS is generally included as a covered service bundled along with delivery and newborn care.

Scope: Jurisdictional-based Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Information Systems (EHDI-IS) collect data on the hearing screening and follow-up status of infants across the United States. These systems serve as tools that assist EHDI programs' staff and partners in their tracking activities and provide a variety of data reports to help ensure that all children who are deaf/hard of hearing (DHH) are identified early and receive recommended intervention services. The quality and timeliness of the data collected with these systems are crucial to effectively meeting these goals.

Methodology: Forty-eight EHDI programs, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), successfully evaluated the accuracy, completeness, uniqueness, and timeliness of the hearing screening data as well as the acceptability (i.e., willingness to report) of the EHDI-IS among data reporters (2013-2016). This article describes the evaluations conducted and presents the findings from these evaluation activities.

Conclusions: Most state EHDI programs are receiving newborn hearing screening results from hospitals and birthing facilities in a consistent way and data reporters are willing to report according to established protocols. However, additional efforts are needed to improve the accuracy and completeness of reported demographic data, results from infants transferred from other hospitals, and results from infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Objective: This study assessed whether children with oral clefts are appropriately classified as at-risk for hearing loss at the time of newborn hearing screening and describes their screening and diagnostic results.

Design: Birth certificates were used to identify children with cleft lip and palate or isolated cleft palate born in Washington State from 2008-2013. These were cross-referenced with the state's Early Hearing Detection, Diagnosis and Intervention (EHDDI) database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine associations.

Results: Birth records identified 235 children with cleft lip and palate and 116 with isolated cleft palate. Six children were listed as having both diagnoses. Only 138 (39%) of these children were designated as having a craniofacial anomaly in the EHDDI database. Children who were misclassified were less likely to have referred on initial hearing screening, OR 0.3, 95% CI [0.2, 0.5]. Misclassification of risk factor status was also associated with delayed hearing screening past 30 days of age or unknown age at screening, OR 4.4, 95% CI [1.5, 13.3], p-value 0.008. Of 50 children with diagnostic results; 25 (50%) had hearing loss: 18 conductive, 2 mixed, and 5 unspecified.

Conclusion: A majority of children with oral clefts were misclassified regarding risk factor for hearing loss in the EHDDI database.