BMC Anesthesiology最新文献

Background: Postoperative pain usually occur in patients who have undergone functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Remimazolam and dexmedetomidine could enhance the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine with respect to the QoR-40 score of patients who have undergone FESS.

Methods: A total of 120 patients (18-65 years) scheduled for FESS were randomly allocated to Group R, Group D or Group C. Group R received 0.075 mg/kg remimazolam loading and 0.1 mg/kg/h infusion. Group D received dexmedetomidine (1.0 µg/kg loading, 0.5 µg/kg/h infusion). Group C received a placebo equal to dexmedetomidine. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol, sufentanil and cisatracurium. Anaesthesia maintenance was performed via target-controlled infusions (TCIs) of propofol and remifentanil. The primary outcome was the QoR-40 score on the day before surgery and postoperative Day 1 (POD1). The secondary outcomes were the time to return to consciousness, length of stay in the PACU, sedation score upon PACU arrival, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and cumulative consumption of propofol and remifentanil. Adverse effects were recorded.

Results: The total QoR-40 scores (median, IQR) on POD1 decreased less (154.5, 152.0 -159.0) in Groups R and D (155.0, 154.8 -159.3) than in Group C (139.0, 136.8 -142.0) (P < 0.001). The time to return of consciousness and the length of stay in the PACU were significantly shorter in Groups R and C than in Group D (P < 0.001). The level of sedation upon PACU arrival (median, IQR) in Groups R (-2.0, -2.0--1.0) and D (-2.0, -3.0--2.0) was greater than that in Group C (1.0, 0.0 -1.0) (P < 0.001). The cumulative consumption rates of propofol and remifentanil in Groups R and D were lower than that in Group C (P < 0.001). Compared with that in Group C, the pain intensity was lower in Groups R and D (P < 0.001).The number of patients occurring PONV was less in Groups R (3/40) and D (4/40) than in Group C (11/40) (P = 0.024). Fifteen patients had bradycardia in Group D, whereas no bradycardia was noted in Groups R or C (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Administration of remimazolam could provide a similar QoR to that of dexmedetomidine. In addition, remimazolam may be a promising option for improving the QoR of patients who have undergone FESS.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2300076209. (Prospectively registered). The initial registration date was 27/9/2023.

Background: Intravenous administration of sufentanil during anesthesia induction induces cough (SIC), sometimes triggers a severe reaction. We wanted to investigate the inhibitory effect of low-dose esketamine on cough induced by sufentanil during the induction of general anesthesia, as well as its postoperative impact on mental status (MMSE score, RSS, and VAS-A).

Methods: A total of 256 adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either esketamine (Group EK) or normal saline (Group C). One minute before the administration of sufentanil, Group EK and Group C were injected with esketamine (0.05 mg/kg, diluted with normal saline to 3 ml) and normal saline (3 ml), respectively. The primary outcomes were the incidence (the basis of the presence or absence of cough) and severity (the frequency of cough episodes) of cough within 2 min after sufentanil injection.The secondary outcomes included hemodynamic variables (MAP, HR, and SPi), mental status (MMSE score, RSS, and VAS-A) and postoperative events (time to awareness, duration of orientation recovery and degree of satisfaction with anesthesia).

Results: A total of 236 adult patients were randomized into two groups (n = 236): Group EK (n = 118) and Group C (n = 118). The incidence of cough in Group EK (21.2%) was significantly lower than that in Group C (40.7%) (P < 0.05). The incidence rates for each grade were as follows: 9.3% and 16.9% for Grade 2, and 0% and 4.2% for Grade 3, respectively.The differences had statistical senses.The MAP and HR at T4 (during tracheal intubation) and T5 (1 min post-intubation) were significantly lower in Group EK (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in MMSE score, RSS, and VAS-A, time to awareness, duration of orientation recovery or satisfaction with anesthesia.

Conclusion: Pretreatment with low-dose esketamine can reduce the incidence and severity of cough induced by sufentanil and maintain hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction without increasing mental status (MMSE score, RSS, and VAS-A).

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400084940, date of registration: 05/28/2024).

Background: There is no significant evidence verifying the efficacy of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy on hemodynamics in patients with sepsis. We investigated how liberal and conservative oxygen therapy influenced stroke volume, cardiac output, and vasopressor needs in patients with sepsis undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 106 patients with an admission diagnosis of infection, a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of two points or higher and required invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two oxygenation strategies: liberal (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of ≥ 96% or conservative (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of 88-92%. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was done twice to measure stroke volume and cardiac output, initially upon enrollment in the trial and then 72 h later. The primary outcome was stroke volume. Secondary outcomes were cardiac output, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay length, and adverse events.

Results: Stroke volume and cardiac output measurements did not differ significantly between research groups after 72 h of oxygenation treatment (p = 0.459 and 0.637, respectively). Forty-five patients (84.9%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group needed vasopressors to maintain their mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg, whereas 35 patients (66.0%) in the liberal group did (p = 0.024). A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the independent variables for vasopressor requirements revealed that patients in the conservative oxygen group were 3.83 times more likely to require vasopressors (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.31-11.18, p = 0.014) than those in the liberal group. Older patients (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.038) and those with higher SOFA scores (AOR = 1.36, CI: 1.09-1.68, P = 0.005) were significantly more likely to need vasopressors.

Conclusions: Liberal or conservative oxygen therapy did not influence stroke volume or cardiac output measurements in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. Patients in the conservative oxygen group were more likely to require vasopressors than those in the liberal group.

Trial registration: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: Aswu/460/5/20) (registration date: 05/05/2020) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04824703) (03/30/2021).

Background: Neuraxial anesthesia is the gold standard for cesarean sections, but general anesthesia is sometimes necessary, especially in emergency cases. Anaphylactic shock due to succinylcholine, a commonly used neuromuscular blocking agent, is rare but life-threatening.

Case presentation: A 42-year-old woman with severe preeclampsia and a history of intracranial vascular malformations underwent an emergency cesarean section. Induction with succinylcholine triggered an anaphylactic shock. Immediate intervention with epinephrine and corticosteroids stabilized the patient, allowing the safe delivery of a live infant.

Discussion and conclusion: This case highlights the need for rapid identification and management of anaphylactic shock during emergency cesarean sections under general anesthesia, especially in high-risk patients with complex medical histories.

Background: Hemodynamic changes are independent risk factors for long-term patient morbidity and duration of hospital stay. According to the statistics, the three most prevalent complications in the postanaesthesia care unit were airway events, haemodynamic instability, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Hemodynamic instability in the postanaesthesia care unit can result in serious complications, such as long-term patient morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. This study aimed to determine the incidence and factors associated with haemodynamic changes among adult surgical patients in the postanaesthetic care unit.

Methods: An institution-based observational study was conducted from December 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. In addition, 409 adult surgery patients participated. We employed consecutive sampling techniques and both analytical and descriptive statistics to explain our findings. Using both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the strength of the association and determined the crude odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in the multivariable regression.

Results: The incidence of hemodynamic instability was 53.8% (CI: 45%, 64%). The incidences of hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, and bradycardia were 24.2%, 17.45%, 31.3%, and 12.6%, respectively. ASA class III, procedures with more than 4 instances of intraoperative haemodynamic instability and neuraxial anaesthesia were significantly associated with haemodynamic instability in the postanaesthetic care unit.

Conclusion: In general, 93 study subjects (22.7%) experienced advanced haemodynamic instability during the intraoperative period. This implies that the incidence of hemodynamic instability was high. Intraoperative haemodynamic instability, American Society of Anaesthesiology class III, postoperative respiratory adverse events, neurologic and gynaecological procedures, use of neuraxial anaesthesia, and prolonged duration of procedures were predictors of haemodynamic instability in the postanaesthesia care unit.

Background: Disturbances in the thermoregulatory system can precipitate inadvertent hypothermia in patients undergoing surgeries lasting over 60 min, causing serious complications in the recovery process. Cutaneous thermal protection is relevant for the control of temperature of patients in the perioperative setting. The standard thermal protection widely utilized is an electric forced warm air blanket. This study compared a new layered textile blanket with the standard protection. The hypothesis posited that the textile blanket could provide cutaneous thermal protection comparable to that of the standard protection (forced-air warming blanket), in terms of temperature variation and safety.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a Portuguese orthopedic hospital from October 2018 to January 2019, comprising 124 adult patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty. Participants were randomly allocated to either the intervention group, receiving the textile blanket, or to the control group, receiving standard measures. Tympanic temperature, shivering, and thermal comfort perception were evaluated at six time points. Comfort dimensions and ergonomic aspects were also assessed. Parametric statistics were performed, and independent samples t-tests and repeated measures were used to compare temperature variations and thermal comfort.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups in mean temperature variation, visual perception of thermal comfort, and thermal and perioperative comfort scales. The intervention group (n = 65) scored significantly higher in ergonomic evaluations compared to the control group (n = 59) for: fit to body and general comfort (p = 0.004), touch (p = 0.005), and feeling of comfort with the inner layer texture and shape (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The tested blanket had a comparable performance to the standard protection, suggesting it as a potential sustainable alternative to the recommended measures for thermal protection. However, further investigations across diverse contexts and populations are needed to validate these findings.

Background: The lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR) is predictive of disease prognosis in some cases. However, the clinical significance of LAR in patients with influenza A virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has yet to be explored. This study aims to investigate whether LAR can be used as a predictor of influenza A virus-induced ARDS.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we enrolled 105 patients with influenza A virus pneumonia into the study and divided the patients into an ARDS group (74 patients) and a non-ARDS group (31 patients) during hospitalization. Clinical characteristics and laboratory data were collected within 24 h after admission. We explored the risk factors for ARDS using logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of potential risk factors for ARDS and ARDS-associated complications were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and Pearson's correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlations between risk factors and clinical and laboratory variables.

Results: LAR was an independent predictor for the development of ARDS in patients with influenza A virus pneumonia and was significantly predictive for ARDS. LAR's area under the curve (AUC) was higher than that of lactate and albumin alone; its AUC was 0.878, with a sensitivity of 71.6% and a specificity of 96.8%. The optimal ROC threshold for distinguishing ARDS from non-ARDS cases was 44.81 × 10^- 3. Correlation analysis indicated that LAR was positively associated with duration of invasive ventilation, and APACHE II and SOFA scores in ARDS patients but was negatively associated with PaO₂/FiO₂ (p < 0.001). Subsequent ROC curve analysis determined that LAR was a robust predictor for the 14-day invasive ventilation (AUC = 0.924), septic shock (AUC = 0.860), and hepatic injury (AUC = 0.905) in hospitalized ARDS patients. It also showed a promising predictive value for 28-day mortality (AUC = 0.881).

Conclusion: LAR strongly predicted ARDS development in patients with influenza A virus pneumonia. It showed a significant correlation with disease severity and provided promising predictive efficiency for extrapulmonary complications and 28-day mortality in patients with influenza A virus-induced ARDS.

Background: Inflammatory markers have been confirmed to be associated with the prognosis of cancer patients. In this study, we compared the impacts of intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) after esophageal cancer surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent esophagectomy from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. Patients respectively received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or inhalational anesthesia (INHA). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to minimize differences. The Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal Wallis test was utilized to compare the effect of the two groups on postoperative NLR, PLR and SII.

Results: A total of 519 patients who had undergone esophageal cancer resection were recruited in this study, among whom 339 patients were eligible (TIVA group, n = 201, INHA group, n = 138). After IPTW, there was no statistically significant difference in NLR, PLR, and SII on the first postoperative day(P = 0.1951), (P = 0.5611), (P = 0.9684) and on the third postoperative day(P = 0.5961), (P = 0.1804), (P = 0.9653) between the two groups.

Conclusions: In conclusion, there was no significant difference in NLR, PLR and SII between intravenous anesthesia or inhalational anesthesia. TIVA is not superior to INHA in reducing the perioperative inflammatory response of esophageal cancer.

Synopsis: Inflammatory markers play an important role in the recurrence, metastasis and survival of tumor patients after surgery. In this study, we will compare the effects of different anesthesia methods on inflammatory markers.

Aims: The aim of this study was to explore whether continuous infusion causing lubrication can effectively alleviate pain during male urethral catheterization.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, double-blinded study included 190 male patients scheduled for urethral catheterization. Patients were randomly allocated into four groups: Group A: the catheter was lubricated with paraffin; Group B: the catheter was lubricated with compound lidocaine gel; Group C: the pump continuously infusing with sterilized water; Group D: the pump continuously infusing with 2% lidocaine. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Statistical analysis system (SAS) (version 9.4) was used to perform all the statistical analyses. Significance for all results was set at P < 0.05.

Results: The VAS of Group D was the lowest (18.90 ± 11.44), followed by the Group C (33.00 ± 11.07), and the VAS of Group A was the highest (53.98 ± 14.76). There were significant differences in VAS in Group D compared to Group A(P < 0.0001), Group B(P < 0.0001) and Group C (P < 0.0001), Group C compared to Group A (P < 0.0001) and Group B(P < 0.0001), Group B compared to Group A (P < 0.0001), indicating that patients treated with lidocaine infusion (Group D) experienced significantly less pain than did those in the other three groups.

Conclusions: Continuous infusion with sterilized water during catheterization is an efficient method for lubricating the urethral mucosa; furthermore, infusion with 2% lidocaine provides better analgesia as well as lubrication.

Trial registration: The study protocol was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300070866) ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=194591 ) on Apr. 25th, 2023.