Pub Date : 2024-07-12DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202038
Nishadi Nethmini Withanage, Jessica R Botfield, Kirsten Black, Danielle Mazza
Background: Documenting medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in electronic medical records (EMRs) could assist general practitioners (GPs) to identify those reproductive-aged women who could most benefit from preconception care (PCC). However, it is unclear to what extent PCC risk factors are identifiable in general practice records. This study aimed to determine the extent to which medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors are documented in general practice EMRs.
Methods: We conducted an audit of the documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception risk factors in 10 general practice EMRs in Melbourne, Australia. We retrospectively analysed the EMRs of 100 consecutive women aged 18-44 years who visited each practice between January and September 2022. Using a template informed by PCC guidelines, we extracted data from structured fields in the EMR and conducted a descriptive analysis.
Results: Among the data extracted, the more commonly documented medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in the EMRs included smoking (79%), blood pressure (74%), alcohol consumption (63%) and body mass index (57%). Among the women audited, 14% were smokers, 24% were obese, 7% had high blood pressure, 5% had diabetes, 28% had a mental health condition, 13% had asthma, 6% had thyroid disease and 17% had been prescribed and could be using a potentially teratogenic medication.
Conclusions: Better documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in structured fields in EMRs may potentially assist primary care providers including GPs in identifying and providing PCC to women who could most benefit from it.
{"title":"Preconception health risk factors documented in general practice electronic medical records.","authors":"Nishadi Nethmini Withanage, Jessica R Botfield, Kirsten Black, Danielle Mazza","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202038","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Documenting medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in electronic medical records (EMRs) could assist general practitioners (GPs) to identify those reproductive-aged women who could most benefit from preconception care (PCC). However, it is unclear to what extent PCC risk factors are identifiable in general practice records. This study aimed to determine the extent to which medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors are documented in general practice EMRs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an audit of the documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception risk factors in 10 general practice EMRs in Melbourne, Australia. We retrospectively analysed the EMRs of 100 consecutive women aged 18-44 years who visited each practice between January and September 2022. Using a template informed by PCC guidelines, we extracted data from structured fields in the EMR and conducted a descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the data extracted, the more commonly documented medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in the EMRs included smoking (79%), blood pressure (74%), alcohol consumption (63%) and body mass index (57%). Among the women audited, 14% were smokers, 24% were obese, 7% had high blood pressure, 5% had diabetes, 28% had a mental health condition, 13% had asthma, 6% had thyroid disease and 17% had been prescribed and could be using a potentially teratogenic medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Better documentation of medical and lifestyle preconception health risk factors in structured fields in EMRs may potentially assist primary care providers including GPs in identifying and providing PCC to women who could most benefit from it.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139711520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-12DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202274
Laura A Payne, Lauren A Wise, Amelia K Wesselink, Siwen Wang, Stacey A Missmer, Alison Edelman
Introduction: Menstrual health is a key patient-reported outcome beyond its importance as a general indicator of health and fertility. However, menstrual function was not measured in the clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. The purpose of this review was to synthesise the existing literature on the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual health outcomes.
Methods: A PubMed search to 31 October 2023 identified a total of 53 publications: 11 prospective cohort studies, 11 retrospective cohort studies or registry-based cohort studies, and 31 cross-sectional or retrospective case-control studies.
Results: Identified studies were generally at moderate-to-high risk of bias due to retrospective design, interviewer bias, and failure to include a non-vaccinated control group. Nonetheless, the bulk of the literature demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccine is associated with temporary changes in menstrual characteristics (cycle length and flow) and menstrual pain. Follicular phase (at the time of vaccination) is associated with greater increases in cycle length. Evidence suggests temporary post-vaccine menstrual changes in adolescents, abnormal vaginal bleeding in postmenopausal individuals, and a potential protective effect of using hormonal contraception.
Conclusions: In this review we found evidence supporting an association between the COVID-19 vaccine and menstrual health outcomes. Given the importance of menstrual function to overall health, we recommend that all future vaccine trials include menstruation as a study outcome. Future vaccine studies should include rigorous assessment of the menstrual cycle as an outcome variable to limit sources of bias, identify biological mechanisms, and elucidate the impact of stress.
{"title":"Association between COVID-19 vaccination and menstruation: a state of the science review.","authors":"Laura A Payne, Lauren A Wise, Amelia K Wesselink, Siwen Wang, Stacey A Missmer, Alison Edelman","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202274","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202274","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Menstrual health is a key patient-reported outcome beyond its importance as a general indicator of health and fertility. However, menstrual function was not measured in the clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. The purpose of this review was to synthesise the existing literature on the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search to 31 October 2023 identified a total of 53 publications: 11 prospective cohort studies, 11 retrospective cohort studies or registry-based cohort studies, and 31 cross-sectional or retrospective case-control studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Identified studies were generally at moderate-to-high risk of bias due to retrospective design, interviewer bias, and failure to include a non-vaccinated control group. Nonetheless, the bulk of the literature demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccine is associated with temporary changes in menstrual characteristics (cycle length and flow) and menstrual pain. Follicular phase (at the time of vaccination) is associated with greater increases in cycle length. Evidence suggests temporary post-vaccine menstrual changes in adolescents, abnormal vaginal bleeding in postmenopausal individuals, and a potential protective effect of using hormonal contraception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this review we found evidence supporting an association between the COVID-19 vaccine and menstrual health outcomes. Given the importance of menstrual function to overall health, we recommend that all future vaccine trials include menstruation as a study outcome. Future vaccine studies should include rigorous assessment of the menstrual cycle as an outcome variable to limit sources of bias, identify biological mechanisms, and elucidate the impact of stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"212-225"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141300007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-12DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202151
Zohra S Lassi, Komal Abdul Rahim, Alexandra Maria Stavropoulos, Lareesa Marie Ryan, Jyoti Tyagi, Bisi Adewale, Jaameeta Kurji, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Salima Meherali, Moazzam Ali
Introduction: The evidence on adolescent empowerment, which involves access to personal and material resources for reproductive autonomy and economic equity, is limited. This systematic review assesses the use of contraceptives in empowering and strengthening the agency and vice versa among adolescents and young women.
Methods: We ran the searches in six electronic databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Campbell Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Web of Science. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using ROBINS-I and ROB-II tools as appropriate. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.
Results: Forty studies that assessed the impact of empowerment on contraceptive use were included. Of these, 14 were non-randomised studies for intervention (NRSIs), and the remaining 26 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The results from RCTs show a significant effect of the sexual and reproductive health empowerment in increasing ever use of contraception (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02, 1.45; n=9; I²=77%; GRADE: Very Low), and insignificant effect on unprotected sex (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.74, 1.26; n=5; I²=86%; GRADE: Very Low) and adolescent pregnancy (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.61, 1.87; n=3; I²=36%; GRADE: Very Low). None of the studies assessed impact of contraceptive use on empowerment.
Conclusions: Empowerment of adolescents and young women certainly improves contraceptive use in the immediate or short-term period. However, more robust studies with low risk of bias, longer-term outcomes, and impact of contraceptive use on empowerment and agency-strengthening are required. To increase contraceptive use uptake, tailored policies and delivery platforms are necessary for youth in low- and middle-income countries.
导言:青少年赋权涉及获得个人和物质资源以实现生殖自主和经济平等,但这方面的证据却很有限。这篇系统性综述评估了避孕药具在增强青少年和年轻女性的能力、加强其代理权以及反之亦然方面的使用情况:我们在六个电子数据库中进行了检索:方法:我们在六个电子数据库中进行了检索:Cochrane 系统性综述数据库 (CDSR) 和 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册 (CENTRAL)、坎贝尔图书馆、MEDLINE (PubMed)、EMBASE、护理与联合健康文献汇编索引 (CINAHL) 和 Web of Science。根据情况使用 ROBINS-I 和 ROB-II 工具对研究的方法学质量进行评估。使用 Review Manager 5.4 进行元分析:共纳入了 40 项评估赋权对避孕药具使用影响的研究。其中 14 项为非随机干预研究(NRSI),其余 26 项为随机对照试验(RCT)。随机对照试验的结果显示,性健康和生殖健康赋权对提高避孕药具的使用率有显著效果(RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02, 1.45; n=9; I²=77%; GRADE: Very Low),而对无保护性行为(RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.74, 1.26; n=5; I²=86%; GRADE: Very Low)和少女怀孕(RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.61, 1.87; n=3; I²=36%; GRADE: Very Low)的影响不明显。没有一项研究评估了避孕药具的使用对赋权的影响:结论:增强青少年和年轻女性的能力无疑会在近期或短期内提高避孕药具的使用率。然而,还需要开展更多稳健的研究,这些研究应具有低偏倚风险、长期结果以及避孕药具的使用对赋权和机构强化的影响。为了提高避孕药具的使用率,有必要为中低收入国家的青年量身定制政策和提供平台。
{"title":"Use of contraceptives, empowerment and agency of adolescent girls and young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zohra S Lassi, Komal Abdul Rahim, Alexandra Maria Stavropoulos, Lareesa Marie Ryan, Jyoti Tyagi, Bisi Adewale, Jaameeta Kurji, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Salima Meherali, Moazzam Ali","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202151","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202151","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The evidence on adolescent empowerment, which involves access to personal and material resources for reproductive autonomy and economic equity, is limited. This systematic review assesses the use of contraceptives in empowering and strengthening the agency and vice versa among adolescents and young women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We ran the searches in six electronic databases: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Campbell Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Web of Science. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using ROBINS-I and ROB-II tools as appropriate. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies that assessed the impact of empowerment on contraceptive use were included. Of these, 14 were non-randomised studies for intervention (NRSIs), and the remaining 26 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The results from RCTs show a significant effect of the sexual and reproductive health empowerment in increasing ever use of contraception (RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02, 1.45; n=9; I²=77%; GRADE: Very Low), and insignificant effect on unprotected sex (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.74, 1.26; n=5; I²=86%; GRADE: Very Low) and adolescent pregnancy (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.61, 1.87; n=3; I²=36%; GRADE: Very Low). None of the studies assessed impact of contraceptive use on empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Empowerment of adolescents and young women certainly improves contraceptive use in the immediate or short-term period. However, more robust studies with low risk of bias, longer-term outcomes, and impact of contraceptive use on empowerment and agency-strengthening are required. To increase contraceptive use uptake, tailored policies and delivery platforms are necessary for youth in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"195-211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140118831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202099
Chandima Hemachandra, Sasha Taylor, Rakibul M Islam, Ensieh Fooladi, Susan R Davis
Objective and rationale: To identify and appraise current national and international clinical menopause guidance documents, and to extract and compare the recommendations of the most robust examples.
Design: Systematic review.
Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Practice guidance documents for menopause published from 2015 until 20 July 2023. Quality was assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.
Results: Twenty-six guidance papers were identified. Of these, five clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and one non-hormonal therapy position statement met AGREE II criteria of being at least of moderate quality. The five CPGs listed symptoms associated with the perimenopause and menopause to be vasomotor symptoms (VMS), disturbed sleep, musculoskeletal pain, decreased sexual function or desire, and mood disturbance (low mood, mood changes or depressive symptoms). Acknowledged potential long-term menopause consequences were urogenital atrophy, and increased risks of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. VMS and menopause-associated mood disturbance were the only consistent indications for systemic menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Some CPGs supported MHT to prevent or treat osteoporosis, but specific guidance was lacking. None recommended MHT for cognitive symptoms or prevention of other chronic disease. Perimenopause-specific recommendations were scant. A neurokinin 3B antagonist, selective serotonin/norepinephrine (noradrenaline) reuptake inhibitors and gabapentin were recommended non-hormonal medications for VMS, and cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnosis were consistently considered as being of potential benefit.
Discussion: The highest quality CPGs consistently recommended MHT for VMS and menopause-associated mood disturbance, whereas clinical depression or cognitive symptoms, and cardiometabolic disease and dementia prevention were not treatment indications. Further research is needed to inform clinical recommendations for symptomatic perimenopausal women.
目的和依据:确定和评估当前国家和国际临床绝经指导文件,并提取和比较最可靠实例的建议:数据来源数据来源:Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 选择研究的资格标准:2015年至2023年7月20日期间发布的更年期实践指导文件。采用研究与评估指南评估 II(AGREE II)工具进行质量评估:结果:确定了 26 篇指导文件。其中,五份临床实践指南(CPG)和一份非激素疗法立场声明符合 AGREE II 标准,至少达到中等质量。这五份临床实践指南列出了与围绝经期和更年期相关的症状,包括血管运动症状(VMS)、睡眠障碍、肌肉骨骼疼痛、性功能或性欲减退以及情绪障碍(情绪低落、情绪变化或抑郁症状)。公认的更年期潜在长期后果是泌尿生殖器萎缩、心血管疾病和骨质疏松症风险增加。更年期综合征和更年期相关情绪障碍是全身性更年期激素疗法(MHT)的唯一一致适应症。一些 CPG 支持使用 MHT 预防或治疗骨质疏松症,但缺乏具体指导。对于认知症状或其他慢性疾病的预防,没有一项建议采用更年期激素疗法。针对围绝经期的建议很少。神经激肽3B拮抗剂、选择性5-羟色胺/去甲肾上腺素(去甲肾上腺素)再摄取抑制剂和加巴喷丁是治疗VMS的推荐非激素药物,认知行为疗法和催眠被一致认为具有潜在益处:讨论:质量最高的 CPGs 一致推荐 MHT 治疗 VMS 和更年期相关情绪障碍,而临床抑郁或认知症状、心脏代谢疾病和痴呆症预防则不属于治疗适应症。需要进一步开展研究,为有症状的围绝经期妇女提供临床建议。
{"title":"A systematic review and critical appraisal of menopause guidelines.","authors":"Chandima Hemachandra, Sasha Taylor, Rakibul M Islam, Ensieh Fooladi, Susan R Davis","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202099","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective and rationale: </strong>To identify and appraise current national and international clinical menopause guidance documents, and to extract and compare the recommendations of the most robust examples.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Practice guidance documents for menopause published from 2015 until 20 July 2023. Quality was assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six guidance papers were identified. Of these, five clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and one non-hormonal therapy position statement met AGREE II criteria of being at least of moderate quality. The five CPGs listed symptoms associated with the perimenopause and menopause to be vasomotor symptoms (VMS), disturbed sleep, musculoskeletal pain, decreased sexual function or desire, and mood disturbance (low mood, mood changes or depressive symptoms). Acknowledged potential long-term menopause consequences were urogenital atrophy, and increased risks of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. VMS and menopause-associated mood disturbance were the only consistent indications for systemic menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Some CPGs supported MHT to prevent or treat osteoporosis, but specific guidance was lacking. None recommended MHT for cognitive symptoms or prevention of other chronic disease. Perimenopause-specific recommendations were scant. A neurokinin 3B antagonist, selective serotonin/norepinephrine (noradrenaline) reuptake inhibitors and gabapentin were recommended non-hormonal medications for VMS, and cognitive behavioural therapy and hypnosis were consistently considered as being of potential benefit.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The highest quality CPGs consistently recommended MHT for VMS and menopause-associated mood disturbance, whereas clinical depression or cognitive symptoms, and cardiometabolic disease and dementia prevention were not treatment indications. Further research is needed to inform clinical recommendations for symptomatic perimenopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"122-138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139711518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201819
Min Zhao, Caitlin Alsandria O'Hara, Norhafizah Bte Sahril, Huijun Liu, Kaiyan Pei, Olena Ivanova, Elin C Larsson, Simukai Shamu, Eneyi Kpokiri, Amanda Cleeve, Joseph D Tucker, Kristien Michielsen, Wei-Hong Zhang
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic, together with the subsequent social distancing measures, could lead to shifts in family and fertility planning. This study aimed to explore the associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in fertility intentions among an international sample of reproductive-aged women.
Methods: A multi-country, cross-sectional study based on data from 10 672 women aged 18-49 years who participated in the International Sexual Health And REproductive Health (I-SHARE) study, which organised an international online survey between July 2020 and February 2021. Factors associated with changes in fertility intentions were explored using multinomial probit regression models. Cluster-robust standard errors were used to calculate model parameters.
Results: Of 10 672 included reproductive-aged women, 14.4% reported changing their fertility intentions due to the pandemic, with 10.2% postponement and 4.2% acceleration. Women who had ever been isolated/quarantined were more likely to postpone their fertility intentions (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.41; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.69) compared with those who had not; women who lived with a steady partner were more likely to want children sooner (AOR=1.57; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.23) compared with those who did not; and those who reported a higher frequency of getting angry, feeling frustrated, or worrying about their finances were more likely to postpone their fertility intentions. The main findings were robust in the sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: Most women who changed fertility intentions because of the pandemic have postponed intentions to expand their families. The pandemic-induced exposures were associated with these postponements.
简介:新冠肺炎大流行,加上随后的社交距离措施,可能会导致家庭和生育计划的转变。本研究旨在探索新冠肺炎大流行与国际育龄妇女生育意愿变化之间的关系。方法:基于10个国家的数据进行的多国横断面研究 672 参加国际性健康与生殖健康(I-SHARE)研究的18-49岁女性,该研究在2020年7月至2021年2月期间组织了一项国际在线调查。使用多项式多项式回归模型探讨了与生育意愿变化相关的因素。使用聚类鲁棒标准误差来计算模型参数。结果:共10个 672名育龄妇女,14.4%的人报告称,由于疫情,她们的生育意愿发生了变化,10.2%的人推迟生育,4.2%的人加快生育。曾被隔离/隔离的女性更有可能推迟生育意愿(调整后的比值比(AOR)=1.41;95%CI为1.18-1.69);与稳定伴侣生活在一起的女性更有可能更早地想要孩子(AOR=1.57;95% CI 1.10至2.23);而那些报告更频繁生气、感到沮丧或担心财务状况的人更有可能推迟生育意愿。在敏感性分析中,主要发现是稳健的。结论:大多数因疫情而改变生育意愿的女性推迟了扩大家庭的意愿。疫情引发的接触与这些延期有关。
{"title":"Associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and women's fertility intentions: a multi-country, cross-sectional (I-SHARE) study.","authors":"Min Zhao, Caitlin Alsandria O'Hara, Norhafizah Bte Sahril, Huijun Liu, Kaiyan Pei, Olena Ivanova, Elin C Larsson, Simukai Shamu, Eneyi Kpokiri, Amanda Cleeve, Joseph D Tucker, Kristien Michielsen, Wei-Hong Zhang","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201819","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201819","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic, together with the subsequent social distancing measures, could lead to shifts in family and fertility planning. This study aimed to explore the associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in fertility intentions among an international sample of reproductive-aged women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-country, cross-sectional study based on data from 10 672 women aged 18-49 years who participated in the International Sexual Health And REproductive Health (I-SHARE) study, which organised an international online survey between July 2020 and February 2021. Factors associated with changes in fertility intentions were explored using multinomial probit regression models. Cluster-robust standard errors were used to calculate model parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10 672 included reproductive-aged women, 14.4% reported changing their fertility intentions due to the pandemic, with 10.2% postponement and 4.2% acceleration. Women who had ever been isolated/quarantined were more likely to postpone their fertility intentions (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.41; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.69) compared with those who had not; women who lived with a steady partner were more likely to want children sooner (AOR=1.57; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.23) compared with those who did not; and those who reported a higher frequency of getting angry, feeling frustrated, or worrying about their finances were more likely to postpone their fertility intentions. The main findings were robust in the sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most women who changed fertility intentions because of the pandemic have postponed intentions to expand their families. The pandemic-induced exposures were associated with these postponements.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49674451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202023
Katie Eirian Hawkins, Kyra Gourlay, Kate Cuschieri
{"title":"Challenges for cervical screening in people experiencing homelessness.","authors":"Katie Eirian Hawkins, Kyra Gourlay, Kate Cuschieri","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202023","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"150-151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139105861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201982
Susie Kilshaw
Background and methodology: UK clinical practices around managing pregnancy remains after pregnancy loss involve a process of documenting consent. Women are typically offered options for disposal, which may include cremation, burial, releasing for private arrangements, releasing to a funeral director and, in some cases, sensitive incineration. A single researcher conducted 20 months of ethnographic fieldwork in one National Health Service (NHS) Trust including observing the consenting process for pregnancy remains disposal (n=28) and interviewing 27 women, including 19 who had experience of the consent process for pregnancy remains disposal, about their understanding, attitudes and experiences of pregnancy remains disposal. Transcripts were analysed for representative themes.
Results: Prior to the discussion and consenting process most participants had not given consideration to disposal methods. Participants expressed surprise about the discussion and disposal pathways with most suggesting it was inappropriate, particularly given the early stage of their pregnancy (<12 weeks' gestation). In some cases, the consenting process caused distress due to the way the participant framed their pregnancy remains being divergent from implied meaning in discussions about disposal.
Conclusions: Current practices appear discordant with the views of some women experiencing miscarriage. A person-centred approach to pregnancy remains disposal is recommended to accommodate a diverse range of approaches so as not to challenge a woman's experience of and agency about her body, pregnancy and pregnancy remains.
{"title":"Women's experiences of the consenting process for pregnancy remains disposal following early miscarriage.","authors":"Susie Kilshaw","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201982","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201982","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and methodology: </strong>UK clinical practices around managing pregnancy remains after pregnancy loss involve a process of documenting consent. Women are typically offered options for disposal, which may include cremation, burial, releasing for private arrangements, releasing to a funeral director and, in some cases, sensitive incineration. A single researcher conducted 20 months of ethnographic fieldwork in one National Health Service (NHS) Trust including observing the consenting process for pregnancy remains disposal (n=28) and interviewing 27 women, including 19 who had experience of the consent process for pregnancy remains disposal, about their understanding, attitudes and experiences of pregnancy remains disposal. Transcripts were analysed for representative themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to the discussion and consenting process most participants had not given consideration to disposal methods. Participants expressed surprise about the discussion and disposal pathways with most suggesting it was inappropriate, particularly given the early stage of their pregnancy (<12 weeks' gestation). In some cases, the consenting process caused distress due to the way the participant framed their pregnancy remains being divergent from implied meaning in discussions about disposal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current practices appear discordant with the views of some women experiencing miscarriage. A person-centred approach to pregnancy remains disposal is recommended to accommodate a diverse range of approaches so as not to challenge a woman's experience of and agency about her body, pregnancy and pregnancy remains.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041544/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139105862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202114
Rita Kabra, Komal Preet Allagh, Brigitte Nsiku Kini, Robert Mulunda Kanke, James Kiarie
{"title":"Scaling postpartum family planning services in the Democratic Republic of Congo: outcomes and lessons learned.","authors":"Rita Kabra, Komal Preet Allagh, Brigitte Nsiku Kini, Robert Mulunda Kanke, James Kiarie","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202114","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202114","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"146-149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139641625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202046
Karin Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Helena Kopp Kallner, Jan Brynhildsen, Helena Kilander
Background: The unmet need for postpartum contraception is a global challenge. Postpartum placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) within 48 hours of vaginal delivery is available in many settings worldwide, but is not routinely practised in Sweden. To improve contraceptive services and facilitate the informed choice of IUD placement at the time of a caesarean section (CS), we performed this study to identify and describe women's experiences of contraceptive services before, during and after an elective CS.
Methods: A qualitative design and methodology was used. We interviewed 20 women aged 28-42 years who underwent elective CS in Sweden. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: The three main themes found were (1) receptivity to contraceptive counselling in the context of CS, (2) communication and decision-making about postpartum contraception before CS and (3) lack of support and guidance to receive contraceptive services before and after CS. The participants described readiness and interest regarding postpartum contraception. They prefered counselling from around 25 weeks of gestation. Despite this finding, antenatal communication and contraceptive decision-making seemed rare. Participants reported a lack of support and guidance which necessitated a need by women to navigate the contraceptive services themselves in order to receive information about contraception before CS and to receive postpartum support.
Conclusions: Antenatal contraceptive counselling including information about IUD placement during CS was appreciated and welcomed by women with elective CS as their birth method. Most of the women whom we interviewed would prefer to receive contraception counselling on postpartum use during the second half of their pregnancy.
{"title":"Women's experiences of postpartum contraceptive services when elective caesarean section is the method of birth: a qualitative study.","authors":"Karin Lichtenstein Liljeblad, Helena Kopp Kallner, Jan Brynhildsen, Helena Kilander","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202046","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The unmet need for postpartum contraception is a global challenge. Postpartum placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) within 48 hours of vaginal delivery is available in many settings worldwide, but is not routinely practised in Sweden. To improve contraceptive services and facilitate the informed choice of IUD placement at the time of a caesarean section (CS), we performed this study to identify and describe women's experiences of contraceptive services before, during and after an elective CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design and methodology was used. We interviewed 20 women aged 28-42 years who underwent elective CS in Sweden. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three main themes found were (1) receptivity to contraceptive counselling in the context of CS, (2) communication and decision-making about postpartum contraception before CS and (3) lack of support and guidance to receive contraceptive services before and after CS. The participants described readiness and interest regarding postpartum contraception. They prefered counselling from around 25 weeks of gestation. Despite this finding, antenatal communication and contraceptive decision-making seemed rare. Participants reported a lack of support and guidance which necessitated a need by women to navigate the contraceptive services themselves in order to receive information about contraception before CS and to receive postpartum support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antenatal contraceptive counselling including information about IUD placement during CS was appreciated and welcomed by women with elective CS as their birth method. Most of the women whom we interviewed would prefer to receive contraception counselling on postpartum use during the second half of their pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041589/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139746147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-11DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202018
Rebecca Blaylock, Maria Lewandowska, Charlotte Kelly, Becky Gunn, Rebecca Meiksin, Rachel H Scott, Melissa J Palmer, Kaye Wellings, Patricia A Lohr, Rebecca S French, The Sacha Study Team N/A
Patient and public involvement (PPI) is limited within abortion-related research. Possible reasons for this include concerns about engaging with a stigmatised patient group who value confidentiality and may be reluctant to re-engage with services. Structural barriers, including limited funding for abortion-related research, also prevent researchers from creating meaningful PPI opportunities. Here, we describe lessons learnt on undertaking PPI as part of the Shaping Abortion for Change (SACHA) Study, which sought to create an evidence base to guide new directions in abortion care in Britain.Two approaches to PPI were used: involving patients and the public in the oversight of the research and its dissemination as lay advisors, and group meetings to obtain patients' views on interpretation of findings and recommendations. All participants observed the SACHA findings aligned with their own experiences of having an abortion in Britain. These priorities aligned closely with those identified in a separate expert stakeholder consultation undertaken as part of the SACHA Study. One additional priority which had not been identified during the research was identified by the PPI participants.We found abortion patients to be highly motivated to engage in the group meetings, and participation in them actively contributed to the destigmatisation of abortion by giving them a space to share their experiences. This may alleviate any ethical concerns about conducting research and PPI on abortion, including the assumption that revisiting an abortion experience will cause distress. We hope that our reflections are useful to others considering PPI in abortion-related research and service improvement.
在堕胎相关研究中,患者和公众参与 (PPI) 有限。可能的原因包括,研究人员担心与被污名化的患者群体接触,他们重视保密性,可能不愿意重新接受服务。结构性障碍,包括人工流产相关研究的资金有限,也阻碍了研究人员创造有意义的 PPI 机会。在此,我们介绍了作为 "塑造堕胎变革(SACHA)研究 "一部分的 "公众参与"(PPI)的经验教训,该研究旨在创建一个证据基础,以指导英国堕胎护理的新方向。"公众参与 "采用了两种方法:让患者和公众作为非专业顾问参与研究的监督和传播,以及召开小组会议以了解患者对研究结果和建议的解释。所有参与者都认为 SACHA 的研究结果与他们在英国堕胎的亲身经历相吻合。这些优先事项与作为 SACHA 研究一部分的单独专家利益相关者咨询中确定的优先事项非常一致。我们发现人工流产患者参与小组会议的积极性很高,参与小组会议为他们提供了一个分享经验的空间,从而积极促进了人工流产的去污名化。这可能会减轻人们对开展流产研究和 PPI 的伦理顾虑,包括重温流产经历会造成痛苦的假设。我们希望我们的思考对其他考虑在人工流产相关研究和服务改进中开展 PPI 的人有所帮助。
{"title":"Patient and public involvement in abortion research: reflections from the Shaping Abortion for Change (SACHA) Study.","authors":"Rebecca Blaylock, Maria Lewandowska, Charlotte Kelly, Becky Gunn, Rebecca Meiksin, Rachel H Scott, Melissa J Palmer, Kaye Wellings, Patricia A Lohr, Rebecca S French, The Sacha Study Team N/A","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202018","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-202018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient and public involvement (PPI) is limited within abortion-related research. Possible reasons for this include concerns about engaging with a stigmatised patient group who value confidentiality and may be reluctant to re-engage with services. Structural barriers, including limited funding for abortion-related research, also prevent researchers from creating meaningful PPI opportunities. Here, we describe lessons learnt on undertaking PPI as part of the Shaping Abortion for Change (SACHA) Study, which sought to create an evidence base to guide new directions in abortion care in Britain.Two approaches to PPI were used: involving patients and the public in the oversight of the research and its dissemination as lay advisors, and group meetings to obtain patients' views on interpretation of findings and recommendations. All participants observed the SACHA findings aligned with their own experiences of having an abortion in Britain. These priorities aligned closely with those identified in a separate expert stakeholder consultation undertaken as part of the SACHA Study. One additional priority which had not been identified during the research was identified by the PPI participants.We found abortion patients to be highly motivated to engage in the group meetings, and participation in them actively contributed to the destigmatisation of abortion by giving them a space to share their experiences. This may alleviate any ethical concerns about conducting research and PPI on abortion, including the assumption that revisiting an abortion experience will cause distress. We hope that our reflections are useful to others considering PPI in abortion-related research and service improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"142-145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041545/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139711519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}