首页 > 最新文献

British medical bulletin最新文献

英文 中文
Translational aspects of novel findings in genetics of male infertility—status quo 2021 and diagnosis and epidemiology of winged scapula in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis 男性不育遗传学新发现的转化方面——现状2021以及癌症患者翼肩胛骨的诊断和流行病学:系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab028
Introduction: Male factor infertility concerns 7–10% of men and among these 40–60% remain unexplained. Sources of data: This review is based on recent published literature regarding the genetic causes of male infertility. Areas of agreement: Screening for karyotype abnormalities, biallelic pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene and Y-chromosomal microdeletions have been routine in andrology practice for >20 years, explaining ∼10% of infertility cases. Rare specific conditions, such as congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, disorders of sex development and defects of sperm morphology and motility, are caused by pathogenic variants in recurrently affected genes, which facilitate high diagnostic yield (40–60%) of targeted gene panel-based testing. Areas of controversy: Progress in mapping monogenic causes of quantitative spermatogenic failure, the major form of male infertility, has been slower. No ‘recurrently’ mutated key gene has been identified and worldwide, a few hundred patients in total have been assigned a possible monogenic cause. Growing points: Given the high genetic heterogeneity, an optimal approach to screen for heterogenous genetic causes of spermatogenic failure is 6 M. Laan et al., 2021, Vol. 140 sequencing exomes or in perspective, genomes. Clinical guidelines developed by multidisciplinary experts are needed for smooth integration of expanded molecular diagnostics in the routine management of infertile men. Areas timely for developing research: Di−/oligogenic causes, structural and common variants implicated in multifactorial inheritance may explain the ‘hidden’ genetic factors. It is also critical to understand how the recently identified diverse genetic factors of infertility link to general male health concerns across lifespan and how the clinical assessment could benefit from this knowledge.
引言:男性因素不孕涉及7-10%的男性,其中40-60%的男性原因不明。数据来源:本综述基于最近发表的关于男性不育遗传原因的文献。一致的领域:筛查核型异常、CFTR基因的双等位基因致病性变体和Y染色体微缺失在男科实践中已经常规了20多年,解释了约10%的不孕病例。罕见的特殊情况,如先天性促性腺功能减退症、性发育障碍以及精子形态和运动缺陷,是由复发性受影响基因的致病性变异引起的,这有助于基于靶向基因组的检测的高诊断率(40-60%)。争议领域:定量生精失败(男性不育的主要形式)的单基因病因定位进展缓慢。目前还没有发现“复发性”突变的关键基因,在全球范围内,总共有几百名患者被指定为可能的单基因原因。生长点:考虑到高度的遗传异质性,筛选生精失败的异质性遗传原因的最佳方法是6 M.Laan等人,2021,第140卷测序外显子组或展望基因组。需要多学科专家制定的临床指南,才能将扩展的分子诊断顺利整合到不育男性的常规管理中。及时开展研究的领域:Di−/寡基因原因、与多因素遗传有关的结构和常见变异可能解释“隐藏”的遗传因素。同样重要的是,要了解最近发现的不孕不育的多种遗传因素如何与整个寿命期的男性健康问题联系起来,以及临床评估如何从这些知识中受益。
{"title":"Translational aspects of novel findings in genetics of male infertility—status quo 2021 and diagnosis and epidemiology of winged scapula in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab028","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Male factor infertility concerns 7–10% of men and among these 40–60% remain unexplained. Sources of data: This review is based on recent published literature regarding the genetic causes of male infertility. Areas of agreement: Screening for karyotype abnormalities, biallelic pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene and Y-chromosomal microdeletions have been routine in andrology practice for >20 years, explaining ∼10% of infertility cases. Rare specific conditions, such as congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, disorders of sex development and defects of sperm morphology and motility, are caused by pathogenic variants in recurrently affected genes, which facilitate high diagnostic yield (40–60%) of targeted gene panel-based testing. Areas of controversy: Progress in mapping monogenic causes of quantitative spermatogenic failure, the major form of male infertility, has been slower. No ‘recurrently’ mutated key gene has been identified and worldwide, a few hundred patients in total have been assigned a possible monogenic cause. Growing points: Given the high genetic heterogeneity, an optimal approach to screen for heterogenous genetic causes of spermatogenic failure is 6 M. Laan et al., 2021, Vol. 140 sequencing exomes or in perspective, genomes. Clinical guidelines developed by multidisciplinary experts are needed for smooth integration of expanded molecular diagnostics in the routine management of infertile men. Areas timely for developing research: Di−/oligogenic causes, structural and common variants implicated in multifactorial inheritance may explain the ‘hidden’ genetic factors. It is also critical to understand how the recently identified diverse genetic factors of infertility link to general male health concerns across lifespan and how the clinical assessment could benefit from this knowledge.","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47074716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical trials in skeletal dysplasia: a paradigm for treating rare diseases. 骨骼发育不良的临床试验:治疗罕见疾病的范例。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab017
Ataf Sabir, Melita Irving

Background: Genetic skeletal dysplasia conditions (GSDs) account for 5% of all birth defects. Until recently, targeted treatments were only available for select few conditions; 1 however, opportunities arising from developments in molecular diagnostic technologies are now leading to unparalleled therapeutic advances. This review explores current GSD clinical trials, their challenges and the hopes for the future.

Sources of data: A systematic literature search of relevant original articles, reviews and meta-analyses restricted to English was conducted using PubMed up to February 2020 regarding emerging GSD therapies.

Areas of agreement: We discuss current clinical trials for in achondroplasia, osteopetrosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, hypophosphataemic rickets, hypophosphatasia and fibrous ossificans progressiva.

Areas of controversy: We explore challenges in GSD drug development from clinician input, cost-effectiveness and evidenced-based practice.

Growing points: We explore opportunities brought by earlier diagnosis, its treatment impact and the challenges of gene editing.

Areas timely for developing research: We horizon scan for future clinical trials.

背景:遗传性骨骼发育不良(GSDs)占所有出生缺陷的5%。直到最近,靶向治疗只适用于少数几种情况;然而,分子诊断技术的发展所带来的机会正在导致前所未有的治疗进步。本文综述了目前GSD的临床试验、面临的挑战和对未来的希望。数据来源:使用PubMed对截至2020年2月的有关新兴GSD疗法的相关原创文章、综述和荟萃分析进行了系统的文献检索,仅限于英文。共识领域:我们讨论了软骨发育不全、骨质疏松、成骨不全、低磷性佝偻病、低磷性骨化症和进行性纤维性骨化症的当前临床试验。争议领域:我们从临床医生投入、成本效益和循证实践等方面探讨GSD药物开发中的挑战。成长点:探讨早期诊断带来的机遇、治疗影响和基因编辑带来的挑战。及时开展研究的领域:我们为未来的临床试验进行水平扫描。
{"title":"Clinical trials in skeletal dysplasia: a paradigm for treating rare diseases.","authors":"Ataf Sabir,&nbsp;Melita Irving","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic skeletal dysplasia conditions (GSDs) account for 5% of all birth defects. Until recently, targeted treatments were only available for select few conditions; 1 however, opportunities arising from developments in molecular diagnostic technologies are now leading to unparalleled therapeutic advances. This review explores current GSD clinical trials, their challenges and the hopes for the future.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>A systematic literature search of relevant original articles, reviews and meta-analyses restricted to English was conducted using PubMed up to February 2020 regarding emerging GSD therapies.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>We discuss current clinical trials for in achondroplasia, osteopetrosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, hypophosphataemic rickets, hypophosphatasia and fibrous ossificans progressiva.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>We explore challenges in GSD drug development from clinician input, cost-effectiveness and evidenced-based practice.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>We explore opportunities brought by earlier diagnosis, its treatment impact and the challenges of gene editing.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>We horizon scan for future clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"16-35"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39362166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Subacromial spacer implantation: an alternative to arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. A systematic review. 肩峰下垫片植入术:关节镜下上囊重建的替代方法。系统回顾。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab014
Leonardo Osti, Lorenzo Milani, Silvana Ferrari, Nicola Maffulli

Introduction: This systematic review evaluated and compared the use of a subacromial spacer implantation (SSI) with arthroscopic superior capsular repair (ASCR) in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) with an assessment of clinical and imaging outcomes.

Sources of data: This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched in PubMed, Medline and Embase database literature using the keywords 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon', 'subacromial device', 'arthroscopy', 'superior capsular reconstruction', 'irreparable rotator cuff tears', 'satisfaction' and 'quality of life'.

Areas of agreement: We included a total of 29 articles (14 about SSI and 15 about ASCR) dealing with outcomes, satisfaction and patients' quality of life.

Areas of controversy: The use of a subacromial spacer showed similar results in terms of patients' satisfaction and quality of life when compared with ASCR.

Growing points: SSI can be implanted quickly and has a low complication rate. It can therefore be considered a good alternative for the management of MIRCTs.

Areas timely for developing research: The subacromial spacer is a biodegradable implant easily implanted at arthroscopy. It can lead good clinical and imaging outcomes in MIRCTs. Similarly, ASCR can be performed with either an autograft or synthetic allograft transplantation, with satisfactory results. Long-term prospective studies are needed to compare SSI and ASCR to verify their effectiveness.

本系统综述评估并比较了肩峰下间隔植入(SSI)和关节镜下上囊修复(ASCR)治疗大量不可修复的肩袖撕裂(mirct)的临床和影像学结果。数据来源:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。我们使用关键词“肩峰下垫片”、“肩峰下球囊”、“肩峰下装置”、“关节镜”、“上囊重建”、“不可修复的肩袖撕裂”、“满意度”和“生活质量”在PubMed、Medline和Embase数据库中检索文献。一致领域:我们共纳入了29篇涉及结局、满意度和患者生活质量的文章(14篇关于SSI, 15篇关于ASCR)。争议领域:与ASCR相比,肩峰下间隔器的使用在患者满意度和生活质量方面显示出相似的结果。生长点:SSI植入速度快,并发症发生率低。因此,它可以被认为是治疗mirct的一个很好的选择。肩峰下垫片是一种易于在关节镜下植入的可生物降解的植入物。它可以在mirct中获得良好的临床和影像学结果。同样,ASCR可以通过自体移植物或合成同种异体移植物移植进行,结果令人满意。需要对SSI和ASCR进行长期的前瞻性研究来验证其有效性。
{"title":"Subacromial spacer implantation: an alternative to arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. A systematic review.","authors":"Leonardo Osti,&nbsp;Lorenzo Milani,&nbsp;Silvana Ferrari,&nbsp;Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review evaluated and compared the use of a subacromial spacer implantation (SSI) with arthroscopic superior capsular repair (ASCR) in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) with an assessment of clinical and imaging outcomes.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched in PubMed, Medline and Embase database literature using the keywords 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon', 'subacromial device', 'arthroscopy', 'superior capsular reconstruction', 'irreparable rotator cuff tears', 'satisfaction' and 'quality of life'.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>We included a total of 29 articles (14 about SSI and 15 about ASCR) dealing with outcomes, satisfaction and patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The use of a subacromial spacer showed similar results in terms of patients' satisfaction and quality of life when compared with ASCR.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>SSI can be implanted quickly and has a low complication rate. It can therefore be considered a good alternative for the management of MIRCTs.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>The subacromial spacer is a biodegradable implant easily implanted at arthroscopy. It can lead good clinical and imaging outcomes in MIRCTs. Similarly, ASCR can be performed with either an autograft or synthetic allograft transplantation, with satisfactory results. Long-term prospective studies are needed to compare SSI and ASCR to verify their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"59-72"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39061323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Placebo effect in pharmacological management of fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis. 纤维肌痛药理学治疗中的安慰剂效应:一项荟萃分析。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab015
Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Jörg Eschweiler, Marcel Betsch, Markus Tingart, Giorgia Colarossi

Introduction: The management of fibromyalgia involves a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

Source of data: Recently published literature in PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase databases.

Areas of agreement: Several pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been proposed for the management of fibromyalgia. However, the management of fibromyalgia remains controversial. The administration of placebo has proved to be more effective than no treatment in many clinical settings and evidence supports the 'therapeutic' effects of placebo on a wide range of symptoms.

Areas of controversy: The placebo effect is believed to impact the clinical outcomes, but its actual magnitude is controversial.

Growing points: A meta-analysis comparing pharmacological management versus placebo administration for fibromyalgia was conducted.

Areas timely for developing research: Drug treatment resulted to be more effective than placebo administration for the management of fibromyalgia. Nevertheless, placebo showed a beneficial effect in patients with fibromyalgia. Treatment-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the drug treatment.

Level of evidence: I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized clinical trials.

简介:纤维肌痛的治疗包括药物和非药物治疗的结合。数据来源:PubMed、Google Scholar和Embase数据库中最近发表的文献。共识领域:已经提出了几种治疗纤维肌痛的药理学和非药理学策略。然而,纤维肌痛的治疗仍然存在争议。在许多临床环境中,服用安慰剂已被证明比不治疗更有效,证据支持安慰剂对多种症状的“治疗”效果。争议领域:安慰剂效应被认为会影响临床结果,但其实际影响程度存在争议。生长点:一项荟萃分析比较了纤维肌痛的药物管理和安慰剂管理。及时开展研究的领域:治疗纤维肌痛的药物治疗结果比安慰剂治疗更有效。然而,安慰剂在纤维肌痛患者中显示出有益的效果。治疗相关不良事件在药物治疗中发生率更高。证据水平:I,双盲随机临床试验的贝叶斯网络meta分析。
{"title":"Placebo effect in pharmacological management of fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Filippo Migliorini,&nbsp;Nicola Maffulli,&nbsp;Jörg Eschweiler,&nbsp;Marcel Betsch,&nbsp;Markus Tingart,&nbsp;Giorgia Colarossi","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of fibromyalgia involves a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>Recently published literature in PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase databases.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Several pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been proposed for the management of fibromyalgia. However, the management of fibromyalgia remains controversial. The administration of placebo has proved to be more effective than no treatment in many clinical settings and evidence supports the 'therapeutic' effects of placebo on a wide range of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The placebo effect is believed to impact the clinical outcomes, but its actual magnitude is controversial.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>A meta-analysis comparing pharmacological management versus placebo administration for fibromyalgia was conducted.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Drug treatment resulted to be more effective than placebo administration for the management of fibromyalgia. Nevertheless, placebo showed a beneficial effect in patients with fibromyalgia. Treatment-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the drug treatment.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of double-blind randomized clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"73-85"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39211928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Capsular repair vs capsulectomy in total hip arthroplasty. 全髋关节置换术中囊膜修复与囊膜切除。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab011
Luca Miranda, Marco Quaranta, Francesco Oliva, Attilio Giuliano, Nicola Maffulli

Background: A major complication of total hip arthroplasty is dislocation. The hip joint capsule can be incised and repaired, or can be excised.

Sources of data: We performed a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines focusing on capsular repair and capsulectomy.

Areas of agreement: We identified 31 articles (17 272 patients). Capsular repair produced a lower blood loss (465.2 vs 709.2 ml), and the procedure lasted 102.5 vs 96.08 min in patients who underwent capsulectomy. The patients undergoing capsulectomy experienced a dislocation rate of 3.06%, whereas in the patients undergoing capsular repair, the dislocation rate was 0.65%.

Areas of controversy: Most studies are retrospective observational studies, with no prospective randomized trials.

Growing points: Capsular preservation is association with a lower dislocation rate and a lower blood loss. Capsular excision does take statistically less time, but it is uncertain how a 6 min difference is clinically relevant.

Areas timely for developing research: Appropriately powered randomized clinical trials should be conducted to better define the association between the chosen implants, approach and outcome.

背景:全髋关节置换术的主要并发症是脱位。髋关节囊可以切开修复,也可以切除。数据来源:我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目对文献进行了系统回顾,重点是囊修复和囊切除术。一致领域:我们确定了31篇文章(17272例患者)。荚膜修复术的失血量较低(465.2 ml vs 709.2 ml),手术时间为102.5 min vs 96.08 min。囊切除术患者脱位率为3.06%,而囊修复术患者脱位率为0.65%。争议领域:大多数研究是回顾性观察性研究,没有前瞻性随机试验。生长点:包膜保存与较低的脱位率和较低的失血有关。从统计学上讲,囊切除确实需要更少的时间,但尚不确定6分钟的差异在临床上是否相关。及时开展研究的领域:应该进行适当的随机临床试验,以更好地确定所选择的植入物、入路和结果之间的关系。
{"title":"Capsular repair vs capsulectomy in total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Luca Miranda,&nbsp;Marco Quaranta,&nbsp;Francesco Oliva,&nbsp;Attilio Giuliano,&nbsp;Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A major complication of total hip arthroplasty is dislocation. The hip joint capsule can be incised and repaired, or can be excised.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>We performed a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines focusing on capsular repair and capsulectomy.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>We identified 31 articles (17 272 patients). Capsular repair produced a lower blood loss (465.2 vs 709.2 ml), and the procedure lasted 102.5 vs 96.08 min in patients who underwent capsulectomy. The patients undergoing capsulectomy experienced a dislocation rate of 3.06%, whereas in the patients undergoing capsular repair, the dislocation rate was 0.65%.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Most studies are retrospective observational studies, with no prospective randomized trials.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Capsular preservation is association with a lower dislocation rate and a lower blood loss. Capsular excision does take statistically less time, but it is uncertain how a 6 min difference is clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Appropriately powered randomized clinical trials should be conducted to better define the association between the chosen implants, approach and outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"36-47"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39338190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Why exercise has a crucial role in cancer prevention, risk reduction and improved outcomes. 为什么运动在预防癌症、降低风险和改善结果方面起着至关重要的作用。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab019
Robert Thomas, Stacey A Kenfield, Yuuki Yanagisawa, Robert U Newton

Introduction: Exercise is one of several factors known to lower the risk of developing cancer, as well as improve outcomes in patients already diagnosed. People who exercise after cancer have lower rates of cancer complications, treatment toxicities, relapse and improved survival. This review highlights the supportive data and biochemical processes, which explain these potential benefits.

Sources of data: PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane libraries were searched for papers which addressed the effects of exercise and physical activity on cancer for this review. The search terms used were physical activity, exercise and cancer up to February 2021. We also referred to the background research required for international exercise intervention study involving men with prostate cancer (INTERVAL-GAP4) and scrutinized references within the robust papers published on this subject to ensure we did not miss any clinically studies. One hundred and eighty eight papers were included.

Areas of agreement: Exercise programmes mitigate many of the complications and risks associated with cancer, particularly thromboembolism, fatigue, weight gain, arthralgia, cognitive impairment and depression.

Areas of controversy: Molecular and biomarker changes, resulting from exercise, suggest that exercise elicits beneficial changes in insulin-related pathways, down-regulates inflammation and serum oestrogen levels, and enhances oxidative, immune and cellular repair pathways. Nonetheless, the evidence remains preliminary.

Growing points: The timing, intensity and challenges of prehabilitation, adjunct and rehabilitation exercise programmes are being increasingly understood but their implementation remains sporadic.

Areas for developing research: More robust clinical trial data are needed to substantiate a causal effect of exercise on overall and cancer-specific survival. These studies are ongoing. Research evaluating the most cost-efficient ways of incorporating prehabilitation, adjunct and rehabilitation programmes into routine practice would be helpful to funding bodies and health care strategists.

简介:运动是已知的几个因素之一,可以降低患癌症的风险,并改善已确诊患者的预后。癌症后锻炼的人癌症并发症、治疗毒性、复发率较低,生存率提高。这篇综述强调了支持性数据和生化过程,它们解释了这些潜在的好处。数据来源:检索PubMed、Embase、Medline和Cochrane图书馆中关于运动和体育活动对癌症影响的论文。截至2021年2月,使用的搜索词包括体育活动、锻炼和癌症。我们还参考了涉及癌症男性的国际运动干预研究(INTERVAL-GAP4)所需的背景研究,并仔细审查了关于该主题发表的大量论文中的参考文献,以确保我们不会错过任何临床研究。收录了一百八十八篇论文。一致意见的领域:运动计划减轻了许多与癌症相关的并发症和风险,特别是血栓栓塞、疲劳、体重增加、关节痛、认知障碍和抑郁症。争议领域:运动引起的分子和生物标志物变化表明,运动会引起胰岛素相关途径的有益变化,下调炎症和血清雌激素水平,并增强氧化、免疫和细胞修复途径。尽管如此,证据仍然是初步的。增长点:人们越来越了解康复、辅助和康复锻炼计划的时间、强度和挑战,但它们的实施仍然是零星的。发展研究的领域:需要更有力的临床试验数据来证实运动对总体存活率和癌症特异性存活率的因果影响。这些研究正在进行中。评估将康复、辅助和康复计划纳入日常实践的最具成本效益的方法的研究将有助于资助机构和医疗保健战略家。
{"title":"Why exercise has a crucial role in cancer prevention, risk reduction and improved outcomes.","authors":"Robert Thomas,&nbsp;Stacey A Kenfield,&nbsp;Yuuki Yanagisawa,&nbsp;Robert U Newton","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab019","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bmb/ldab019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise is one of several factors known to lower the risk of developing cancer, as well as improve outcomes in patients already diagnosed. People who exercise after cancer have lower rates of cancer complications, treatment toxicities, relapse and improved survival. This review highlights the supportive data and biochemical processes, which explain these potential benefits.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane libraries were searched for papers which addressed the effects of exercise and physical activity on cancer for this review. The search terms used were physical activity, exercise and cancer up to February 2021. We also referred to the background research required for international exercise intervention study involving men with prostate cancer (INTERVAL-GAP4) and scrutinized references within the robust papers published on this subject to ensure we did not miss any clinically studies. One hundred and eighty eight papers were included.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Exercise programmes mitigate many of the complications and risks associated with cancer, particularly thromboembolism, fatigue, weight gain, arthralgia, cognitive impairment and depression.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Molecular and biomarker changes, resulting from exercise, suggest that exercise elicits beneficial changes in insulin-related pathways, down-regulates inflammation and serum oestrogen levels, and enhances oxidative, immune and cellular repair pathways. Nonetheless, the evidence remains preliminary.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>The timing, intensity and challenges of prehabilitation, adjunct and rehabilitation exercise programmes are being increasingly understood but their implementation remains sporadic.</p><p><strong>Areas for developing research: </strong>More robust clinical trial data are needed to substantiate a causal effect of exercise on overall and cancer-specific survival. These studies are ongoing. Research evaluating the most cost-efficient ways of incorporating prehabilitation, adjunct and rehabilitation programmes into routine practice would be helpful to funding bodies and health care strategists.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"100-119"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8431973/pdf/ldab019.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39338237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Management of Gustilo-Anderson IIIB open tibial fractures in adults-a systematic review. 成人Gustilo-Anderson IIIB开放性胫骨骨折的治疗-一项系统综述。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab013
A Myatt, H Saleeb, G A J Robertson, Jana Keren Bourhill, P R J Page, A M Wood

Introduction: Open tibial fractures are the most common open long bone fracture, despite this, the management of these complex injuries still remains a topic of discussion amongst orthopaedic surgeons.

Sources of data: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar and a systematic review of 7500 articles, leaving 23 after exclusion criteria were applied, in order to analyse the management of open tibial fractures.

Areas of agreement and controversy: Infection was noted to be the most significant concern amongst authors, with definitive external fixation having a high rate of superficial pin-site infection and internal fixation having a high deep infection rate.

Growing points: It is essential to have a combined ortho-plastic approach to the management of these fractures as muscle flaps were the most common form of soft tissue coverage.

Areas timely for developing research: A national pragmatic trial into the management of open tibial fractures is required looking at fixation methods and soft tissue coverage, with at least a 2-year follow-up in order to ascertain the most appropriate management of these fractures and patient-related outcomes.

开放性胫骨骨折是最常见的开放性长骨骨折,尽管如此,这些复杂损伤的处理仍然是骨科医生讨论的话题。数据来源:我们检索了EMBASE、MEDLINE和Google Scholar,并对7500篇文章进行了系统评价,在排除标准后,只剩下23篇,以分析开放性胫骨骨折的治疗。一致和争议的领域:感染被认为是作者最关心的问题,明确的外固定物具有高的表面针位感染率,而内固定物具有高的深部感染率。生长点:由于肌肉瓣是软组织覆盖最常见的形式,因此对这些骨折进行联合矫形治疗是至关重要的。及时开展研究的领域:需要开展一项针对开放性胫骨骨折治疗的全国性实用试验,研究固定方法和软组织覆盖范围,至少进行2年的随访,以确定最合适的骨折治疗方法和患者相关结果。
{"title":"Management of Gustilo-Anderson IIIB open tibial fractures in adults-a systematic review.","authors":"A Myatt,&nbsp;H Saleeb,&nbsp;G A J Robertson,&nbsp;Jana Keren Bourhill,&nbsp;P R J Page,&nbsp;A M Wood","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Open tibial fractures are the most common open long bone fracture, despite this, the management of these complex injuries still remains a topic of discussion amongst orthopaedic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar and a systematic review of 7500 articles, leaving 23 after exclusion criteria were applied, in order to analyse the management of open tibial fractures.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement and controversy: </strong>Infection was noted to be the most significant concern amongst authors, with definitive external fixation having a high rate of superficial pin-site infection and internal fixation having a high deep infection rate.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>It is essential to have a combined ortho-plastic approach to the management of these fractures as muscle flaps were the most common form of soft tissue coverage.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>A national pragmatic trial into the management of open tibial fractures is required looking at fixation methods and soft tissue coverage, with at least a 2-year follow-up in order to ascertain the most appropriate management of these fractures and patient-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"48-58"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39154503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Platelet-rich plasma versus steroids injections for greater trochanter pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 富血小板血浆与类固醇注射治疗大转子疼痛综合征:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab018
Filippo Migliorini, Nardeen Kader, Jörg Eschweiler, Markus Tingart, Nicola Maffulli

Introduction: Greater trochanter pain syndrome (GTPS) is characterized by a persistent and debilitating pain around the greater trochanter. GTPS can be caused by a combination of gluteus medius or minimus tendinopathy, snapping hip or trochanteric bursitis.

Source of data: Recent published literatures identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus.

Areas of agreement: Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CCS) injections are useful options to manage symptoms of GTPS.

Areas of controversy: Whether PRP leads to superior outcomes compared to CCS injections is unclear.

Growing points: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing PRP versus CCS in the management of GTPS was conducted.

Areas timely for developing research: PRP injections are more effective than CCS at approximately 2 years follow-up.

简介:大转子疼痛综合征(GTPS)的特征是大转子周围持续和衰弱性疼痛。GTPS可由臀中肌或臀小肌腱病变、断髋或转子滑囊炎共同引起。数据来源:PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus中最近发表的文献。同意领域:富血小板血浆(PRP)和皮质类固醇(CCS)注射是治疗GTPS症状的有效选择。争议领域:与CCS注射相比,PRP是否能带来更好的结果尚不清楚。成长要点:对PRP与CCS在GTPS治疗中的比较进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。及时开展研究的领域:大约2年后,PRP注射比CCS更有效。
{"title":"Platelet-rich plasma versus steroids injections for greater trochanter pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Filippo Migliorini,&nbsp;Nardeen Kader,&nbsp;Jörg Eschweiler,&nbsp;Markus Tingart,&nbsp;Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Greater trochanter pain syndrome (GTPS) is characterized by a persistent and debilitating pain around the greater trochanter. GTPS can be caused by a combination of gluteus medius or minimus tendinopathy, snapping hip or trochanteric bursitis.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>Recent published literatures identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids (CCS) injections are useful options to manage symptoms of GTPS.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Whether PRP leads to superior outcomes compared to CCS injections is unclear.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing PRP versus CCS in the management of GTPS was conducted.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>PRP injections are more effective than CCS at approximately 2 years follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"86-99"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39322413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare. 人工智能的前景:回顾人工智能在医疗保健领域的机遇和挑战。
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab016
Yuri Y M Aung, David C S Wong, Daniel S W Ting

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly evolving fields in various sectors, including healthcare. This article reviews AI's present applications in healthcare, including its benefits, limitations and future scope.

Sources of data: A review of the English literature was conducted with search terms 'AI' or 'ML' or 'deep learning' and 'healthcare' or 'medicine' using PubMED and Google Scholar from 2000-2021.

Areas of agreement: AI could transform physician workflow and patient care through its applications, from assisting physicians and replacing administrative tasks to augmenting medical knowledge.

Areas of controversy: From challenges training ML systems to unclear accountability, AI's implementation is difficult and incremental at best. Physicians also lack understanding of what AI implementation could represent.

Growing points: AI can ultimately prove beneficial in healthcare, but requires meticulous governance similar to the governance of physician conduct.

Areas timely for developing research: Regulatory guidelines are needed on how to safely implement and assess AI technology, alongside further research into the specific capabilities and limitations of its medical use.

人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)在包括医疗保健在内的各个领域都是快速发展的领域。本文回顾了人工智能目前在医疗保健领域的应用,包括它的优点、局限性和未来的范围。数据来源:使用PubMED和Google Scholar检索2000-2021年的英文文献,检索词为“AI”或“ML”或“深度学习”和“healthcare”或“medicine”。合作领域:人工智能可以通过其应用程序改变医生的工作流程和患者护理,从协助医生和取代管理任务到增加医学知识。争议领域:从训练ML系统的挑战到不明确的问责制,人工智能的实施是困难的,充其量是渐进的。医生也缺乏对人工智能应用可能代表什么的理解。增长点:人工智能最终会在医疗保健领域被证明是有益的,但需要细致的管理,就像对医生行为的管理一样。及时开展研究的领域:需要制定关于如何安全实施和评估人工智能技术的监管指南,同时进一步研究其医疗用途的具体能力和局限性。
{"title":"The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare.","authors":"Yuri Y M Aung,&nbsp;David C S Wong,&nbsp;Daniel S W Ting","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly evolving fields in various sectors, including healthcare. This article reviews AI's present applications in healthcare, including its benefits, limitations and future scope.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>A review of the English literature was conducted with search terms 'AI' or 'ML' or 'deep learning' and 'healthcare' or 'medicine' using PubMED and Google Scholar from 2000-2021.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>AI could transform physician workflow and patient care through its applications, from assisting physicians and replacing administrative tasks to augmenting medical knowledge.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>From challenges training ML systems to unclear accountability, AI's implementation is difficult and incremental at best. Physicians also lack understanding of what AI implementation could represent.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>AI can ultimately prove beneficial in healthcare, but requires meticulous governance similar to the governance of physician conduct.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Regulatory guidelines are needed on how to safely implement and assess AI technology, alongside further research into the specific capabilities and limitations of its medical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"4-15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39334010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70
The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare and clinical trials in skeletal dysplasia: a paradigm for treating rare diseases 人工智能的前景:回顾人工智能在骨骼发育不良的医疗保健和临床试验中的机遇和挑战:治疗罕见疾病的范例
IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldab022
Norman J. Vetter
{"title":"The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare and clinical trials in skeletal dysplasia: a paradigm for treating rare diseases","authors":"Norman J. Vetter","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44754557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
British medical bulletin
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1