Filippo Migliorini, Jörg Eschweiler, Christian Götze, Arne Driessen, Markus Tingart, Nicola Maffulli
Introduction: Chondral defects of the knee are common and their treatment is challenging.
Source of data: PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus databases.
Areas of agreement: Both autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and membrane-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) have been used to manage chondral defects of the knee.
Areas of controversy: It is debated whether AMIC and mACI provide equivalent outcomes for the management of chondral defects in the knee at midterm follow-up. Despite the large number of clinical studies, the optimal treatment is still controversial.
Growing points: To investigate whether AMIC provide superior outcomes than mACI at midterm follow-up.
Areas timely for developing research: AMIC may provide better outcomes than mACI for chondral defects of the knee. Further studies are required to verify these results in a clinical setting.
膝关节软骨缺损是常见的,其治疗具有挑战性。数据来源:PubMed, Google scholar, Embase和Scopus数据库。一致领域:自体基质诱导的软骨形成(AMIC)和膜诱导的自体软骨细胞植入(mACI)已被用于膝关节软骨缺损的治疗。争议领域:在中期随访中,对于膝关节软骨缺损的治疗,AMIC和mACI是否提供了相同的结果,这是有争议的。尽管有大量的临床研究,但最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。生长点:探讨中期随访时AMIC是否优于mACI。及时开展研究的领域:对于膝关节软骨缺损,AMIC可能比mACI提供更好的结果。需要进一步的研究在临床环境中验证这些结果。
{"title":"Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review.","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Jörg Eschweiler, Christian Götze, Arne Driessen, Markus Tingart, Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldac004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chondral defects of the knee are common and their treatment is challenging.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus databases.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Both autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and membrane-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) have been used to manage chondral defects of the knee.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>It is debated whether AMIC and mACI provide equivalent outcomes for the management of chondral defects in the knee at midterm follow-up. Despite the large number of clinical studies, the optimal treatment is still controversial.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>To investigate whether AMIC provide superior outcomes than mACI at midterm follow-up.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>AMIC may provide better outcomes than mACI for chondral defects of the knee. Further studies are required to verify these results in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"141 1","pages":"47-59"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351375/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39628532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ethics and antibiotic resistance and considerations for the implementation of machine learning into acute care settings","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldac006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44050612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common condition characterized by reproductive, hyperandrogenic and dysmetabolic features, and often becomes clinically manifest during adolescence, particularly with weight-gain. Sources of data Pubmed search. Areas of agreement PCOS is heritable and closely associates with obesity (based on data from both epidemiological and genetic studies). Furthermore, insulin resistance forms a central cornerstone of the pathogenesis of PCOS and mediates a close association between obesity and the severity of the phenotypic features of PCOS. Areas of controversy Our understanding of the pathogenesis of PCOS remains incomplete, especially regarding its missing heritability (with only a small fraction having been identified from the genome-wide association studies reported to date), and its developmental origins. Growing points A challenge for the future is to explore a role for epigenetic modifications in the development of PCOS, and implications for the in utero environment and novel therapeutic opportunities.
{"title":"Why are women with polycystic ovary syndrome obese?","authors":"T M Barber","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldac007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac007","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common condition characterized by reproductive, hyperandrogenic and dysmetabolic features, and often becomes clinically manifest during adolescence, particularly with weight-gain. Sources of data Pubmed search. Areas of agreement PCOS is heritable and closely associates with obesity (based on data from both epidemiological and genetic studies). Furthermore, insulin resistance forms a central cornerstone of the pathogenesis of PCOS and mediates a close association between obesity and the severity of the phenotypic features of PCOS. Areas of controversy Our understanding of the pathogenesis of PCOS remains incomplete, especially regarding its missing heritability (with only a small fraction having been identified from the genome-wide association studies reported to date), and its developmental origins. Growing points A challenge for the future is to explore a role for epigenetic modifications in the development of PCOS, and implications for the in utero environment and novel therapeutic opportunities.","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: This paper explores how the built environment impacts upon health and well-being and suggests that there are opportunities for more integrated working between professionals and citizens to create healthier, happier places.
Sources of data: Policy and practice guidance is presented from the urban planning and design fields. Evidence and data are presented from a range of disciplines on housing, green infrastructure and mental well-being.
Areas of agreement: There is an overwhelming agreement around the principles and rationale of incorporating health in planning and design processes.
Areas of controversy: These principles are not always implemented in practice. Challenges also exist around how different disciplines create and use evidence.
Growing points: More innovative ways of working which incorporates health, public health, planners, designers and citizens, which responds to the needs of communities, should be tested.
Areas timely for developing research: Health and public health professionals can contribute to the evidence base using objective measures to assess the impact of the built environment on mental health and well-being.
{"title":"Healthy, happy places-a more integrated approach to creating health and well-being through the built environment?","authors":"Rachel Turnbull","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper explores how the built environment impacts upon health and well-being and suggests that there are opportunities for more integrated working between professionals and citizens to create healthier, happier places.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Policy and practice guidance is presented from the urban planning and design fields. Evidence and data are presented from a range of disciplines on housing, green infrastructure and mental well-being.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>There is an overwhelming agreement around the principles and rationale of incorporating health in planning and design processes.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>These principles are not always implemented in practice. Challenges also exist around how different disciplines create and use evidence.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>More innovative ways of working which incorporates health, public health, planners, designers and citizens, which responds to the needs of communities, should be tested.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Health and public health professionals can contribute to the evidence base using objective measures to assess the impact of the built environment on mental health and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"140 1","pages":"62-75"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39804683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The British Medical Bulletin (BMB) has an extensive archive dating back to 1943. Each quarter, the journal publishes a paper from that archive. This quarter, I thought it would be interesting to look at ‘On the place of physical treatment in Psychiatry’ that is written by Aubrey Lewis. This is an overview of some of the more hair-raising ‘shock treatments’ meted out to people with psychiatric disorders previously. He points out that any treatment should be ‘rational and their mode of action understood’. He quotes a number of studies which are in contradiction with each other, such as the use of insulin therapy in schizophrenia and frontal leucotomy in intractable disease. He makes the point that, with such variations in outcome, the treatment cannot be used. He makes the point that diagnostic criteria are more complex in psychiatry, making treatment comparisons difficult. The author, Sir Aubrey Julian Lewis, was the first professor of psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, which is now part of King’s College, London. It has been said that the flowering of British psychiatry after World War ll can be attributed to three factors: a long humanitarian tradition, the NHS and Aubrey Lewis.
{"title":"From the archive","authors":"Vetter N.","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab029","url":null,"abstract":"<span>The British Medical Bulletin (BMB) has an extensive archive dating back to 1943. Each quarter, the journal publishes a paper from that archive. This quarter, I thought it would be interesting to look at ‘On the place of physical treatment in Psychiatry’ that is written by Aubrey Lewis. This is an overview of some of the more hair-raising ‘shock treatments’ meted out to people with psychiatric disorders previously. He points out that any treatment should be ‘rational and their mode of action understood’. He quotes a number of studies which are in contradiction with each other, such as the use of insulin therapy in schizophrenia and frontal leucotomy in intractable disease. He makes the point that, with such variations in outcome, the treatment cannot be used. He makes the point that diagnostic criteria are more complex in psychiatry, making treatment comparisons difficult. The author, Sir Aubrey Julian Lewis, was the first professor of psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, which is now part of King’s College, London. It has been said that the flowering of British psychiatry after World War ll can be attributed to three factors: a long humanitarian tradition, the NHS and Aubrey Lewis.</span>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"151 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction or background: Mosaic overgrowth syndromes (OS) are a proteiform ensemble of rare diseases displaying asymmetric overgrowth involving any tissue type, with degrees of severity ranging from isolated malformation to life-threatening conditions such as pulmonary embolism. Despite discordant clinical presentations, all those syndromes share common genetic anomalies: somatic mutations of genes involved in cell growth and proliferation. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway is one of the most prominent regulators of cell homeostasis, and somatic oncogenic mutations affecting this pathway are responsible for mosaic OS. This review aims to describe the clinical and molecular characteristics of the main OS involving the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, along with the treatments available or under development.
Sources of data: This review summarizes available data regarding OS in scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals.
Areas of agreement: OS care requires a multidisciplinary approach relying on clinical and radiological follow-up along with symptomatic treatment. However, no specific treatment has yet shown efficacy in randomized control trials.
Areas of controversy: Clinical classifications of OS led to frequent misdiagnosis. Moreover, targeted therapies directed at causal mutated proteins are developing in OSs through cancer drugs repositioning, but the evidence of efficacy and tolerance is still lacking for most of them.
Growing points: The genetic landscape of OS is constantly widening and molecular classifications tend to increase the accuracy of diagnosis, opening opportunities for targeted therapies.
Areas timely for developing research: OS are a dynamic, expanding field of research. Studies focusing on the identification of genetic anomalies and their pharmacological inhibition are needed.
{"title":"Treatment strategies for mosaic overgrowth syndromes of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway.","authors":"Gabriel Morin, Guillaume Canaud","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction or background: </strong>Mosaic overgrowth syndromes (OS) are a proteiform ensemble of rare diseases displaying asymmetric overgrowth involving any tissue type, with degrees of severity ranging from isolated malformation to life-threatening conditions such as pulmonary embolism. Despite discordant clinical presentations, all those syndromes share common genetic anomalies: somatic mutations of genes involved in cell growth and proliferation. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway is one of the most prominent regulators of cell homeostasis, and somatic oncogenic mutations affecting this pathway are responsible for mosaic OS. This review aims to describe the clinical and molecular characteristics of the main OS involving the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, along with the treatments available or under development.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>This review summarizes available data regarding OS in scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>OS care requires a multidisciplinary approach relying on clinical and radiological follow-up along with symptomatic treatment. However, no specific treatment has yet shown efficacy in randomized control trials.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Clinical classifications of OS led to frequent misdiagnosis. Moreover, targeted therapies directed at causal mutated proteins are developing in OSs through cancer drugs repositioning, but the evidence of efficacy and tolerance is still lacking for most of them.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>The genetic landscape of OS is constantly widening and molecular classifications tend to increase the accuracy of diagnosis, opening opportunities for targeted therapies.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>OS are a dynamic, expanding field of research. Studies focusing on the identification of genetic anomalies and their pharmacological inhibition are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"140 1","pages":"36-49"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39423093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Milger P Plaza Meza, Theodorakys Marín Fermín, Nicola Maffulli
Background: Winged scapula (WS) is a critical complication of axillary surgery in patients treated for breast cancer, and is associated with pain, impairment of the upper extremity's function and poor performance in daily activities.
Sources of data: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase and Virtual Health Library databases from January 1, 2000 to December 1, 2020. Clinical studies evaluating the diagnosis and epidemiology of WS among breast cancer surgery (BCS) patients were included.
Areas of agreement: The diagnosis of WS relies almost entirely on physical assessment. Studies have suggested a high variability in the report of the incidence of WS given the subjectivity of its diagnosis, and the different criteria used during clinical assessment.
Areas of controversy: The diagnosis of WS in BCS patients remains a challenge given the lack of standardized diagnostic protocols. Physical examination cannot rely on one manoeuvre only, as it may overlook patients with subtle injuries or overweight and contributing to the underreporting of its incidence.
Growing points: BCS patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection experience a significantly higher incidence of WS than those undergoing sentinel lymph node dissection. The global incidence of WS after BCS is 16.79%. Additionally, the anterior flexion test and the push-up test are the most commonly performed diagnostic manoeuvers.
Areas timely for developing research: Further studies should aim for objective diagnostic tests, especially when the condition is not evident.
背景:有翼肩胛骨(WS)是乳腺癌患者腋窝手术的一个重要并发症,与疼痛、上肢功能损害和日常活动能力差有关。数据来源:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。2000年1月1日至2020年12月1日,两名独立审稿人检索了PubMed、Embase和Virtual Health Library数据库。纳入评估乳腺癌手术(BCS)患者WS诊断和流行病学的临床研究。同意领域:WS的诊断几乎完全依赖于身体评估。研究表明,由于WS诊断的主观性和临床评估时使用的不同标准,WS发病率报告存在很大的可变性。争议领域:由于缺乏标准化的诊断方案,BCS患者WS的诊断仍然是一个挑战。体格检查不能仅仅依靠一种方法,因为它可能会忽略轻微损伤或超重的患者,从而导致其发生率的低报。生长点:行腋窝淋巴结清扫术的BCS患者WS发生率明显高于行前哨淋巴结清扫术的BCS患者。BCS后WS的全球发病率为16.79%。此外,前屈试验和俯卧撑试验是最常用的诊断操作。及时开展研究的领域:进一步的研究应以客观诊断测试为目标,特别是在病情不明显的情况下。
{"title":"Diagnosis and epidemiology of winged scapula in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Milger P Plaza Meza, Theodorakys Marín Fermín, Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Winged scapula (WS) is a critical complication of axillary surgery in patients treated for breast cancer, and is associated with pain, impairment of the upper extremity's function and poor performance in daily activities.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase and Virtual Health Library databases from January 1, 2000 to December 1, 2020. Clinical studies evaluating the diagnosis and epidemiology of WS among breast cancer surgery (BCS) patients were included.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>The diagnosis of WS relies almost entirely on physical assessment. Studies have suggested a high variability in the report of the incidence of WS given the subjectivity of its diagnosis, and the different criteria used during clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The diagnosis of WS in BCS patients remains a challenge given the lack of standardized diagnostic protocols. Physical examination cannot rely on one manoeuvre only, as it may overlook patients with subtle injuries or overweight and contributing to the underreporting of its incidence.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>BCS patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection experience a significantly higher incidence of WS than those undergoing sentinel lymph node dissection. The global incidence of WS after BCS is 16.79%. Additionally, the anterior flexion test and the push-up test are the most commonly performed diagnostic manoeuvers.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Further studies should aim for objective diagnostic tests, especially when the condition is not evident.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"140 1","pages":"23-35"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39376298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Male factor infertility concerns 7-10% of men and among these 40-60% remain unexplained.
Sources of data: This review is based on recent published literature regarding the genetic causes of male infertility.
Areas of agreement: Screening for karyotype abnormalities, biallelic pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene and Y-chromosomal microdeletions have been routine in andrology practice for >20 years, explaining ~10% of infertility cases. Rare specific conditions, such as congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, disorders of sex development and defects of sperm morphology and motility, are caused by pathogenic variants in recurrently affected genes, which facilitate high diagnostic yield (40-60%) of targeted gene panel-based testing.
Areas of controversy: Progress in mapping monogenic causes of quantitative spermatogenic failure, the major form of male infertility, has been slower. No 'recurrently' mutated key gene has been identified and worldwide, a few hundred patients in total have been assigned a possible monogenic cause.
Growing points: Given the high genetic heterogeneity, an optimal approach to screen for heterogenous genetic causes of spermatogenic failure is sequencing exomes or in perspective, genomes. Clinical guidelines developed by multidisciplinary experts are needed for smooth integration of expanded molecular diagnostics in the routine management of infertile men.
Areas timely for developing research: Di-/oligogenic causes, structural and common variants implicated in multifactorial inheritance may explain the 'hidden' genetic factors. It is also critical to understand how the recently identified diverse genetic factors of infertility link to general male health concerns across lifespan and how the clinical assessment could benefit from this knowledge.
{"title":"Translational aspects of novel findings in genetics of male infertility-status quo 2021.","authors":"Maris Laan, Laura Kasak, Margus Punab","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Male factor infertility concerns 7-10% of men and among these 40-60% remain unexplained.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>This review is based on recent published literature regarding the genetic causes of male infertility.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Screening for karyotype abnormalities, biallelic pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene and Y-chromosomal microdeletions have been routine in andrology practice for >20 years, explaining ~10% of infertility cases. Rare specific conditions, such as congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, disorders of sex development and defects of sperm morphology and motility, are caused by pathogenic variants in recurrently affected genes, which facilitate high diagnostic yield (40-60%) of targeted gene panel-based testing.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Progress in mapping monogenic causes of quantitative spermatogenic failure, the major form of male infertility, has been slower. No 'recurrently' mutated key gene has been identified and worldwide, a few hundred patients in total have been assigned a possible monogenic cause.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>Given the high genetic heterogeneity, an optimal approach to screen for heterogenous genetic causes of spermatogenic failure is sequencing exomes or in perspective, genomes. Clinical guidelines developed by multidisciplinary experts are needed for smooth integration of expanded molecular diagnostics in the routine management of infertile men.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Di-/oligogenic causes, structural and common variants implicated in multifactorial inheritance may explain the 'hidden' genetic factors. It is also critical to understand how the recently identified diverse genetic factors of infertility link to general male health concerns across lifespan and how the clinical assessment could benefit from this knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"140 1","pages":"5-22"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/a3/ldab025.PMC8677437.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39859386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Filippo Migliorini, Jörg Eschweiler, Christian Goetze, Markus Tingart, Nicola Maffulli
Introduction: Chondral defects of the knee are common and their management is challenging.
Source of data: Current scientific literature published in PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus.
Areas of agreement: Membrane-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) has been used to manage chondral defects of the knee.
Areas of controversy: Hyaluronic acid membrane provides better outcomes than a collagenic membrane for mACI in the knee at midterm follow-up is controversial.
Growing points: To investigate whether hyaluronic acid membrane may provide comparable clinical outcomes than collagenic membranes for mACI in focal defects of the knee.
Areas timely for developing research: Hyaluronic acid membrane yields a lower rate of failures and revision surgeries for mACI in the management of focal articular cartilage defects of the knee compared with collagenic scaffolds at midterm follow-up. No difference was found in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Further comparative studies are required to validate these results in a clinical setting.
{"title":"Membrane scaffolds for matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: a systematic review.","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Jörg Eschweiler, Christian Goetze, Markus Tingart, Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chondral defects of the knee are common and their management is challenging.</p><p><strong>Source of data: </strong>Current scientific literature published in PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Membrane-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) has been used to manage chondral defects of the knee.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>Hyaluronic acid membrane provides better outcomes than a collagenic membrane for mACI in the knee at midterm follow-up is controversial.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>To investigate whether hyaluronic acid membrane may provide comparable clinical outcomes than collagenic membranes for mACI in focal defects of the knee.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>Hyaluronic acid membrane yields a lower rate of failures and revision surgeries for mACI in the management of focal articular cartilage defects of the knee compared with collagenic scaffolds at midterm follow-up. No difference was found in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Further comparative studies are required to validate these results in a clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"140 1","pages":"50-61"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39440195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Despite advances in technology including the development of more sophisticated methods of monitoring blood glucose and delivering insulin, many individuals with type 1 diabetes continue to experience significant challenges in optimizing glycaemic control. Alternative treatment approaches to insulin are required. Increasing efforts have focused on developing treatments aimed at targeting the underlying disease process to modulate the immune system, maximize beta cell function and enhance endogenous insulin production and action.
Sources of data: Literature searches with keywords 'Type 1 diabetes and immunotherapy', publications relating to clinical trials of immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes.
Areas of agreement: Insulin therapy is insufficient to achieve optimal glycaemic control in many individuals with type 1 diabetes, and new treatment approaches are required. Studies have showed promising results for the use of immunotherapy as a means of delaying disease onset and progression.
Areas of controversy: The optimal way of identifying individuals most likely to benefit from immunotherapies.
Growing points: A better understanding of the natural history of type 1 diabetes has made it possible to identify individuals who have developed autoimmunity but have not yet progressed to clinical diabetes, offering opportunities not only to develop treatments that delay disease progression, but prevent its development in the first place. A consensus on how to identify individuals who may benefit from immunotherapy to prevent disease onset is needed.
Areas timely for developing research: The development of optimal strategies for preventing and delaying progression of type 1 diabetes, and monitoring the response to immunointervention.
{"title":"Immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes.","authors":"L A Allen, C M Dayan","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advances in technology including the development of more sophisticated methods of monitoring blood glucose and delivering insulin, many individuals with type 1 diabetes continue to experience significant challenges in optimizing glycaemic control. Alternative treatment approaches to insulin are required. Increasing efforts have focused on developing treatments aimed at targeting the underlying disease process to modulate the immune system, maximize beta cell function and enhance endogenous insulin production and action.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>Literature searches with keywords 'Type 1 diabetes and immunotherapy', publications relating to clinical trials of immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>Insulin therapy is insufficient to achieve optimal glycaemic control in many individuals with type 1 diabetes, and new treatment approaches are required. Studies have showed promising results for the use of immunotherapy as a means of delaying disease onset and progression.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The optimal way of identifying individuals most likely to benefit from immunotherapies.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>A better understanding of the natural history of type 1 diabetes has made it possible to identify individuals who have developed autoimmunity but have not yet progressed to clinical diabetes, offering opportunities not only to develop treatments that delay disease progression, but prevent its development in the first place. A consensus on how to identify individuals who may benefit from immunotherapy to prevent disease onset is needed.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>The development of optimal strategies for preventing and delaying progression of type 1 diabetes, and monitoring the response to immunointervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"140 1","pages":"76-90"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39714594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}