Gold star (AuST), which is one of the important anisotropic gold structures, finds applications in catalysis, sensing, and photothermal therapy by virtue of its branches of high aspect ratio. The preparation of AuSTs can prove challenging as it requires stringent reaction condition(s) and solution composition including various chemical additives, which are not suitable for either disposal in the environment or use in health-related studies. Furthermore, these chemical additives often cover the gold surface and hence cause interferences in the applications of AuSTs. In this work, we have reported a proof of concept for preparing AuSTs of monodispersed size on glassy carbon electrodes by developing a simple electrosynthesis method using an aqueous acid solution of chloroauric acid in the absence of any chemical additive, structure-directing or surface-protecting agent. This electrosynthesis strategy was developed by understanding the corresponding electrocrystallization mechanism and designing a suitable potentiostatic pulse strategy. The current response per unit area of the gold content for the oxidation of N-Acetyl-L-cysteine was found to be superior on AuSTs compared to widely used citrate-capped gold nanoparticles (cit-AuNPs) and bare gold.
金星(AuST)是重要的各向异性金结构之一,凭借其高宽比分支,可应用于催化、传感和光热治疗等领域。AuST 的制备具有挑战性,因为它需要严格的反应条件和溶液成分,包括各种化学添加剂,这些添加剂既不适合在环境中处置,也不适合用于健康相关研究。此外,这些化学添加剂通常会覆盖金的表面,从而对 AuST 的应用造成干扰。在这项工作中,我们报告了在玻璃碳电极上制备单分散尺寸 AuST 的概念验证,即在不使用任何化学添加剂、结构引导剂或表面保护剂的情况下,使用氯金酸水溶液开发一种简单的电合成方法。这种电合成策略是通过了解相应的电结晶机制和设计合适的恒电位脉冲策略而开发出来的。研究发现,与广泛使用的柠檬酸金纳米颗粒(cit-AuNPs)和裸金相比,AuSTs 在氧化 N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸时的单位面积金含量电流响应更优。
{"title":"An additive-free electrosynthesis of gold micro-stars for sensitive electroanalysis of N-Acetyl-L-cysteine compared to conventional gold nanoparticles","authors":"Saurav K. Guin, Alexandra Lapiy, Eithne Dempsey","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202300009","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202300009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gold star (AuST), which is one of the important anisotropic gold structures, finds applications in catalysis, sensing, and photothermal therapy by virtue of its branches of high aspect ratio. The preparation of AuSTs can prove challenging as it requires stringent reaction condition(s) and solution composition including various chemical additives, which are not suitable for either disposal in the environment or use in health-related studies. Furthermore, these chemical additives often cover the gold surface and hence cause interferences in the applications of AuSTs. In this work, we have reported a proof of concept for preparing AuSTs of monodispersed size on glassy carbon electrodes by developing a simple electrosynthesis method using an aqueous acid solution of chloroauric acid in the absence of any chemical additive, structure-directing or surface-protecting agent. This electrosynthesis strategy was developed by understanding the corresponding electrocrystallization mechanism and designing a suitable potentiostatic pulse strategy. The current response per unit area of the gold content for the oxidation of <i>N</i>-Acetyl-L-cysteine was found to be superior on AuSTs compared to widely used citrate-capped gold nanoparticles (cit-AuNPs) and bare gold.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202300009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47194069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) batteries as the next-generation battery system have an ultrahigh theoretical energy density. However, the limited conversion of polysulfides in sulfur cathodes deteriorates the performance of Li-S batteries. In this study, we develop a novel titanium nitride (TiN) catalyst for sulfur cathodes via atomic layer deposition (ALD). The synthesized ALD-TiN catalyst shows controllable ultrafine particle size (<2 nm) and uniform distribution at the nanoscale in the carbon matrix. Combined with electrochemical analysis and multiple post-characterization techniques, ALD-TiN demonstrates an excellent catalytic effect to facilitate the nucleation and deposition of Li2S, which effectively suppresses the dissolution and shuttle of polysulfides. The as-prepared sulfur cathodes, with the assistance of TiN catalyst, exhibit excellent cycling performance at a high rate (4 C) and deliver 200% higher discharge capacity than the pristine Sulfur-pristine porous carbon composite cathodes.
{"title":"Catalytic conversion of polysulfides by atomic layer deposition derived titanium nitride for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries","authors":"Ameer Nizami, Zhao Yang, Sixu Deng, Ruying Li, Xia Li, Xueliang Sun","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202200013","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202200013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) batteries as the next-generation battery system have an ultrahigh theoretical energy density. However, the limited conversion of polysulfides in sulfur cathodes deteriorates the performance of Li-S batteries. In this study, we develop a novel titanium nitride (TiN) catalyst for sulfur cathodes via atomic layer deposition (ALD). The synthesized ALD-TiN catalyst shows controllable ultrafine particle size (<2 nm) and uniform distribution at the nanoscale in the carbon matrix. Combined with electrochemical analysis and multiple post-characterization techniques, ALD-TiN demonstrates an excellent catalytic effect to facilitate the nucleation and deposition of Li<sub>2</sub>S, which effectively suppresses the dissolution and shuttle of polysulfides. The as-prepared sulfur cathodes, with the assistance of TiN catalyst, exhibit excellent cycling performance at a high rate (4 C) and deliver 200% higher discharge capacity than the pristine Sulfur-pristine porous carbon composite cathodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202200013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43376790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The European Symposium on Electrochemical Engineering ESEE is organized by the Working Party on Electrochemical Engineering (WPEE) of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering every 3 years. The 12th ESEE, on June 14–17 2021, was planned at Wetsus European Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology in Leeuwarden but had, unfortunately, to be held online due to the COVID 19 pandemic.
The focus of the event was on “Electrochemistry for electrification and energy transition toward a sustainable future.” It captures the aims of the WPEE to showcase scientific advances in physical, chemical and biochemical routes toward a future where electrochemical engineering is part of a sustainable society, closing resource cycles and contributing to zero-pollution mobility and manufacturing. All around the rapid electrification of our society can be found, changing how we recover valuable resources in a more sustainable way, make chemical products, store energy, provide energy to our houses, and go from place to place. Increasingly we move from molecular building blocks and processes toward a world where the electron is the carrier of energy and information and is the key building block to create new materials.
The scientific program of the conference covered over 140 oral presentation and 25 posters, two tutorials and a match making session for academic and industrial researchers. Two important prizes of the WPEE were given and accompanied by award lectures: “Recognition for a Life Devoted to Electrochemical Engineering 2020 Award” to Professor Christos Comninellis and the “Carl Wagner Medal 2020” to Dr Emmanuel Mousset. Overall it was a very successful event, although we unfortunately could not meet in person and not visit beautiful Leeuwarden. This Special Issue is bringing together a small selection of contributions presented during the event. It was prepared thanks to collaboration of the journal editorial office and authors of the contributions and we hope, you will enjoy reading it.
We also would like to invite you to the 13th ESEE, which will be held in Toulouse from 26th to 29th of June 2023. Focus of the event is on the Electrochemical Engineering as the key enabling to overcome current societal problems regarding energy, environment, and life.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
欧洲电化学工程研讨会ESEE是由欧洲化学工程联合会电化学工程工作组(WPEE)每三年举办一次。第12届ESEE计划于2021年6月14日至17日在Leeuwarden的wesus欧洲可持续水技术卓越中心举行,但不幸的是,由于COVID - 19大流行,不得不在线举行。此次活动的重点是“电气化和能源转型向可持续未来的电化学”。它抓住了WPEE的目标,即展示物理,化学和生化路线的科学进步,走向未来,电化学工程是可持续社会的一部分,关闭资源循环并为零污染的交通和制造做出贡献。我们社会的快速电气化随处可见,它改变了我们如何以更可持续的方式回收宝贵的资源,制造化学产品,储存能源,为我们的房子提供能源,以及从一个地方到另一个地方。我们越来越多地从分子构建模块和过程转向电子作为能量和信息载体的世界,电子是创造新材料的关键构建模块。会议的科学项目包括140多个口头报告和25个海报,两个教程和一个学术和工业研究人员的配对会议。WPEE的两个重要奖项颁发并伴随着颁奖讲座:Christos Comninellis教授的“表彰终身致力于电化学工程的2020年奖”和Emmanuel Mousset博士的“Carl Wagner Medal 2020”。总的来说,这是一次非常成功的活动,尽管我们很遗憾不能亲自见面,也不能参观美丽的吕伐登。本期特刊汇集了活动期间提交的一小部分文章。感谢期刊编辑部和投稿作者的合作,我们希望您会喜欢它。我们还想邀请您参加第13届ESEE,该会议将于2023年6月26日至29日在图卢兹举行。本次活动的重点是电化学工程作为解决当前能源、环境和生命等社会问题的关键。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Editorial: European symposium on electrochemical engineering","authors":"Ann Cornell, Claudia Weidlich, Karel Bouzek","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202300010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202300010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Symposium on Electrochemical Engineering ESEE is organized by the Working Party on Electrochemical Engineering (WPEE) of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering every 3 years. The 12th ESEE, on June 14–17 2021, was planned at Wetsus European Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Water Technology in Leeuwarden but had, unfortunately, to be held online due to the COVID 19 pandemic.</p><p>The focus of the event was on “Electrochemistry for electrification and energy transition toward a sustainable future.” It captures the aims of the WPEE to showcase scientific advances in physical, chemical and biochemical routes toward a future where electrochemical engineering is part of a sustainable society, closing resource cycles and contributing to zero-pollution mobility and manufacturing. All around the rapid electrification of our society can be found, changing how we recover valuable resources in a more sustainable way, make chemical products, store energy, provide energy to our houses, and go from place to place. Increasingly we move from molecular building blocks and processes toward a world where the electron is the carrier of energy and information and is the key building block to create new materials.</p><p>The scientific program of the conference covered over 140 oral presentation and 25 posters, two tutorials and a match making session for academic and industrial researchers. Two important prizes of the WPEE were given and accompanied by award lectures: “Recognition for a Life Devoted to Electrochemical Engineering 2020 Award” to Professor Christos Comninellis and the “Carl Wagner Medal 2020” to Dr Emmanuel Mousset. Overall it was a very successful event, although we unfortunately could not meet in person and not visit beautiful Leeuwarden. This Special Issue is bringing together a small selection of contributions presented during the event. It was prepared thanks to collaboration of the journal editorial office and authors of the contributions and we hope, you will enjoy reading it.</p><p>We also would like to invite you to the 13th ESEE, which will be held in Toulouse from 26th to 29th of June 2023. Focus of the event is on the Electrochemical Engineering as the key enabling to overcome current societal problems regarding energy, environment, and life.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202300010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41758439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The present application note summarizes an advanced methodology that allows for deriving potential-dependent volcano curves for energy storage and conversion processes. The conventional approach relies on the combination of density functional theory calculations and scaling relations for a single mechanistic pathway as well as a discussion of electrocatalytic activity by means of the potential-determining step, determined at the equilibrium potential of the reaction. Herein, it is illustrated how several reaction mechanisms can be factored into the volcano curve and how the rate-determining step based on the descriptor Gmax(U) can be derived by a rigorous thermodynamic analysis of adsorption free energies fed by a data-inspired methodology.
{"title":"Toward data- and mechanistic-driven volcano plots in electrocatalysis","authors":"Kai S. Exner","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202200014","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202200014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present application note summarizes an advanced methodology that allows for deriving potential-dependent volcano curves for energy storage and conversion processes. The conventional approach relies on the combination of density functional theory calculations and scaling relations for a single mechanistic pathway as well as a discussion of electrocatalytic activity by means of the potential-determining step, determined at the equilibrium potential of the reaction. Herein, it is illustrated how several reaction mechanisms can be factored into the volcano curve and how the rate-determining step based on the descriptor <i>G</i><sub>max</sub>(<i>U</i>) can be derived by a rigorous thermodynamic analysis of adsorption free energies fed by a data-inspired methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202200014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42188896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The activity of catalysts is mainly dictated by the adsorption strength of reaction intermediates at their surfaces. For electrocatalysts in solution, the adsorption strength is not only determined by the intrinsic properties of catalysts and reactants, but also by the solvation energy of reaction intermediates, which is difficult to capture with theoretical methods. Here, we report the impact of different explicit solvation approaches in estimating the stability of oxygenates on the (111) surface of platinum, widely used in oxygen electrocatalysis. We simulate the adsorption of OH, O, and OOH intermediates, relevant for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions, on Pt(111) with different solvation environments. We apply the static water bilayer model, typically adopted to calculate solvation energies on Pt(111) in computational studies. We then study the trend of solvation energies under different microsolvation environments, by adsorbing the intermediates in presence of an increasing number of water molecules. Last, we use a dynamic approach based on ab-initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) to account for dynamic effects. Our results indicate that the stabilities of oxygenates approach those of the water bilayer when the number of molecules increases from zero to three, but the free energies are affected in a not trivial way by the morphology and size of the water cluster, due to the increased complexity and configurational space. Moreover, static methods imply overcorrected free energies. The adoption of a molecular dynamics approach, based on single-run AIMD simulation of the Pt(111)/H2O interface, allows retrieval estimates close to the experimental observation, including dynamic effects, and is highly transferrable. These results suggest that i) when using a microsolvation scheme, it is recommended to include a few water molecules, up to three to resemble the picture of the static bilayer model; ii) dynamic effects are important and can be included with a single-run AIMD scheme.
{"title":"Role of solvation model on the stability of oxygenates on Pt(111): A comparison between microsolvation, extended bilayer, and extended metal/water interface","authors":"Giovanni Di Liberto, Livia Giordano","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202100204","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202100204","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The activity of catalysts is mainly dictated by the adsorption strength of reaction intermediates at their surfaces. For electrocatalysts in solution, the adsorption strength is not only determined by the intrinsic properties of catalysts and reactants, but also by the solvation energy of reaction intermediates, which is difficult to capture with theoretical methods. Here, we report the impact of different explicit solvation approaches in estimating the stability of oxygenates on the (111) surface of platinum, widely used in oxygen electrocatalysis. We simulate the adsorption of OH, O, and OOH intermediates, relevant for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions, on Pt(111) with different solvation environments. We apply the static water bilayer model, typically adopted to calculate solvation energies on Pt(111) in computational studies. We then study the trend of solvation energies under different microsolvation environments, by adsorbing the intermediates in presence of an increasing number of water molecules. Last, we use a dynamic approach based on ab-initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) to account for dynamic effects. Our results indicate that the stabilities of oxygenates approach those of the water bilayer when the number of molecules increases from zero to three, but the free energies are affected in a not trivial way by the morphology and size of the water cluster, due to the increased complexity and configurational space. Moreover, static methods imply overcorrected free energies. The adoption of a molecular dynamics approach, based on single-run AIMD simulation of the Pt(111)/H<sub>2</sub>O interface, allows retrieval estimates close to the experimental observation, including dynamic effects, and is highly transferrable. These results suggest that i) when using a microsolvation scheme, it is recommended to include a few water molecules, up to three to resemble the picture of the static bilayer model; ii) dynamic effects are important and can be included with a single-run AIMD scheme.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202100204","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42389593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
William W. Jacques was an American electrical engineer and chemist who designed in 1896 a very unusual fuel cell operated on solid (coal) fuel named by him a “carbon battery”. While the majority of fuel cells utilize gas (usually H2) or liquid (e.g., ethanol) fuel, the “carbon battery” designed by Jacques was based on a carbon electrode operated as the fuel.
The battery consisted of 100 cells connected in series (Figure 1a) and placed on top of a furnace that kept the electrolyte temperature between 400–500°C (Figure 1b). The produced electrical output was 16 A at 90 V. Based on the experimental results, Jacques claimed ca. 82% efficiency for his carbon battery, but careful analysis considering the heat energy used in the furnace and the energy used to pump air (O2 was an oxidizer) resulted in a much lower battery efficiency of ca. 8%.
Later research demonstrated that the current generated by his battery was not obtained through electrochemical reaction as suggested by Jacques, but rather through the thermoelectric effect. Several subsequent researchers have stated that Jacques's was the last notable attempt to derive electricity directly from coal.
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
William W. Jacques是一位美国电气工程师和化学家,他在1896年设计了一种非常不寻常的燃料电池,使用固体(煤)燃料,他将其命名为“碳电池”。虽然大多数燃料电池使用气体(通常是H2)或液体(如乙醇)燃料,但雅克设计的“碳电池”是基于碳电极作为燃料。该电池由100个串联的电池组成(图1a),并放置在保持电解质温度在400-500°C之间的熔炉顶部(图1b)。产生的电输出为16a,电压为90v。根据实验结果,雅克声称他的碳电池的效率约为82%,但仔细分析考虑到炉中使用的热能和用于泵送空气的能量(O2是氧化剂),导致电池效率低得多,约为8%。后来的研究表明,他的电池产生的电流并不是像雅克所说的通过电化学反应获得的,而是通过热电效应获得的。随后的几位研究人员表示,雅克的尝试是最后一次直接从煤炭中获取电力的著名尝试。作者宣称他没有利益冲突。
{"title":"Electrochemical contributions: William W. Jacques (1855–1932)","authors":"Evgeny Katz","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202300004","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202300004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>William W. Jacques was an American electrical engineer and chemist who designed in 1896 a very unusual fuel cell operated on solid (coal) fuel named by him a “carbon battery”. While the majority of fuel cells utilize gas (usually H<sub>2</sub>) or liquid (e.g., ethanol) fuel, the “carbon battery” designed by Jacques was based on a carbon electrode operated as the fuel.</p><p>The battery consisted of 100 cells connected in series (Figure 1a) and placed on top of a furnace that kept the electrolyte temperature between 400–500°C (Figure 1b). The produced electrical output was 16 A at 90 V. Based on the experimental results, Jacques claimed ca. 82% efficiency for his carbon battery, but careful analysis considering the heat energy used in the furnace and the energy used to pump air (O<sub>2</sub> was an oxidizer) resulted in a much lower battery efficiency of ca. 8%.</p><p>Later research demonstrated that the current generated by his battery was not obtained through electrochemical reaction as suggested by Jacques, but rather through the thermoelectric effect. Several subsequent researchers have stated that Jacques's was the last notable attempt to derive electricity directly from coal.</p><p>The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202300004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46477241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hans Wenking (Figure 1) was a German electrical engineer, physicist and inventor who devoted his lifetime to the development of electronic equipment for chemistry and physics, particularly constructing the first potentiostats, which became major parts of modern electrochemical instruments. He was the first who described the basic principles of potentiostats.
In 1952, Hans Wenking constructed an electronic amplifier for controlling an oscilloscope using a mirror galvanometer with the signals recorded on photographic paper. This amplifier was later used as a core of a new potentiostat with only a power supplier added. This potentiostat, being an important instrument for electrochemical investigations, was designed by Wenking during his work at the Max Plank Institute in Göttingen, Germany. At that time Hans Wenking was working in a group with Professor Karl Friedrich Bonhoeffer where he was appointed to develop a potentiostat that was needed for electrochemical experiments, particularly, for studying corrosion.
Until 1957, Wenking's potentiostat was manufactured only for the internal use of the Max Planck Institute in Göttingen. Later Hans Wenking together with Gerhard Bank established “Elektronische Werkstatt Göttingen” to commercialize the potentiostats. From 1959, the company operated under the name “Gerhard Bank Electronik”. Wenking designed the instruments as a freelance, but the brand “Wenking potentiostat” (Figure 2) soon became a famous trademark. The consequence of the potentiostat development was a rush in the development of electrochemical science. The phenomena of metal passivity could be better explained, including mechanisms of oxide layer formation, and far beyond the materials science. The potentiostat became a standard instrument for most electrochemical investigations, particularly for electroanalytical measurements.
Independent of Wenking's work, similar instruments were designed by other companies. Tacussel was one of those companies which came to a similar design as Wenking's potentiostats and started manufacturing potentiostats in France. In the USA, Wenking's potentiostats were leading on the market and became standard instruments in electrochemical labs.
Wenking has never published his results in scientific papers. On the other hand, Wenking never concealed the technical details of his instruments. The circuits and layouts designed by him were included in the operation manuals for the instruments, and even in some manuals, a detailed theoretical treatise was given. Wenking's instruments were always state-of-the-art and electrochemists of the 1950s–70s used them for many different applications.
In the 1920s–50s many polarographic and later voltammetric (e.g., cyclic voltammetry) measurements were performed using a two-electrode configuration composed of a dropping mercury electrode or any other small working electrode and a counter electrode, also serving as a reference. The two-electrode conf
Hans Wenking(图1)是一位德国电气工程师、物理学家和发明家,他一生致力于化学和物理电子设备的发展,特别是建造了第一个电位器,它成为现代电化学仪器的主要组成部分。他是第一个描述电位器基本原理的人。1952年,汉斯·文金(Hans Wenking)制作了一个电子放大器,用镜面振镜控制示波器,并将信号记录在相纸上。这个放大器后来被用作一个新的恒电位器的核心,只增加了一个电源供应商。该定位器是王文金在德国Göttingen普朗克研究所工作时设计的,是电化学研究的重要仪器。当时,汉斯·文金和卡尔·弗里德里希·邦霍费尔教授在一个小组里工作,他被任命开发一种电化学实验所需的恒电位器,特别是研究腐蚀。直到1957年,Wenking的恒电位器只在Göttingen的马克斯普朗克研究所内部使用。后来Hans Wenking与Gerhard Bank一起成立了“电子工程公司Göttingen”,将电位器商业化。从1959年起,该公司以“Gerhard Bank Electronik”的名义运营。Wenking以自由职业者的身份设计了这些仪器,但“Wenking电位器”(图2)这个品牌很快就成为了一个著名的商标。恒电位器发展的结果是电化学科学发展的一次飞跃。金属钝化现象可以更好地解释,包括氧化层的形成机制,远远超出了材料科学。恒电位器成为大多数电化学研究,特别是电分析测量的标准仪器。除了Wenking的工作,其他公司也设计了类似的仪器。塔库塞尔公司就是其中之一,他们采用了与南京电位器类似的设计,并开始在法国生产电位器。在美国,温金电位器在市场上处于领先地位,成为电化学实验室的标准仪器。Wenking从未在科学论文中发表过他的研究结果。另一方面,文金从不隐瞒他的乐器的技术细节。他所设计的电路和布置图被收录在仪器的操作手册中,有的说明书还作了详细的理论论述。Wenking的仪器一直是最先进的,20世纪50年代至70年代的电化学家将它们用于许多不同的应用。在20世纪20年代至50年代,许多极谱法和后来的伏安法(例如,循环伏安法)测量是使用由滴汞电极或任何其他小工作电极和反电极组成的双电极配置进行的,也可作为参考。只要工作电极很小,电位扫描速度不快,背景溶液中含有高浓度的电解质,然后在液相中提供小电流和小电阻,双电极结构就能提供合理的电化学测量质量。换句话说,电解质溶液中的电位降对电位测量精度影响不大,因此,施加电压与工作电极的实际电位接近。然而,当分析测量开始在非水溶剂中进行时,具有更高的电阻或/并且电位扫描速率要快得多(特别是在循环伏安法中),然后产生更大的电流,液相中的电位下降变得明显,因此需要补偿。在这个时候,标准的电化学/电分析配置包括一个添加了参考电极的三电极配置。三个电极,工作电极,计数器和参考电极与恒电位器一起工作,恒电位器具有比以前使用的双电极极谱仪更复杂的电子电路。虽然有时参考电极并不真正需要或难以使用,特别是在微型电化学电池或在生物流体中工作的植入式电化学装置中,但现代电分析装置总是具有允许其使用三个电极的电路。大约在20世纪50年代,当许多电位器商品化时,电化学仪器从两个电极变为三个电极,从而作为电位器工作(图3和图4);其中很多都是基于汉斯·文金的基本设计。其中一些装置用于控制电位电解槽,而不是电分析应用。
{"title":"Electrochemical contributions: Hans Wenking (1923–2007)","authors":"Evgeny Katz","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202300003","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202300003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hans Wenking (Figure 1) was a German electrical engineer, physicist and inventor who devoted his lifetime to the development of electronic equipment for chemistry and physics, particularly constructing the first potentiostats, which became major parts of modern electrochemical instruments. He was the first who described the basic principles of potentiostats.</p><p>In 1952, Hans Wenking constructed an electronic amplifier for controlling an oscilloscope using a mirror galvanometer with the signals recorded on photographic paper. This amplifier was later used as a core of a new potentiostat with only a power supplier added. This potentiostat, being an important instrument for electrochemical investigations, was designed by Wenking during his work at the Max Plank Institute in Göttingen, Germany. At that time Hans Wenking was working in a group with Professor Karl Friedrich Bonhoeffer where he was appointed to develop a potentiostat that was needed for electrochemical experiments, particularly, for studying corrosion.</p><p>Until 1957, Wenking's potentiostat was manufactured only for the internal use of the Max Planck Institute in Göttingen. Later Hans Wenking together with Gerhard Bank established “Elektronische Werkstatt Göttingen” to commercialize the potentiostats. From 1959, the company operated under the name “Gerhard Bank Electronik”. Wenking designed the instruments as a freelance, but the brand “Wenking potentiostat” (Figure 2) soon became a famous trademark. The consequence of the potentiostat development was a rush in the development of electrochemical science. The phenomena of metal passivity could be better explained, including mechanisms of oxide layer formation, and far beyond the materials science. The potentiostat became a standard instrument for most electrochemical investigations, particularly for electroanalytical measurements.</p><p>Independent of Wenking's work, similar instruments were designed by other companies. Tacussel was one of those companies which came to a similar design as Wenking's potentiostats and started manufacturing potentiostats in France. In the USA, Wenking's potentiostats were leading on the market and became standard instruments in electrochemical labs.</p><p>Wenking has never published his results in scientific papers. On the other hand, Wenking never concealed the technical details of his instruments. The circuits and layouts designed by him were included in the operation manuals for the instruments, and even in some manuals, a detailed theoretical treatise was given. Wenking's instruments were always state-of-the-art and electrochemists of the 1950s–70s used them for many different applications.</p><p>In the 1920s–50s many polarographic and later voltammetric (e.g., cyclic voltammetry) measurements were performed using a two-electrode configuration composed of a dropping mercury electrode or any other small working electrode and a counter electrode, also serving as a reference. The two-electrode conf","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202300003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46568525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John Edward Brough Randles (Figure 1) was an English electrochemist who made important contributions to the theoretical background of polarography, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Many modern techniques of electrochemistry are descended from his work, including cyclic voltammetry, anodic stripping voltammetry, and various types of hydrodynamic voltammetry. The Randles-Ševčík equation applied on linear sweep voltammetry and cyclic voltammetry, and the Randles equivalent circuit used in the modeling of impedance spectra are named after him.
The earliest electrochemical work of Randles performed with an oscillopolarograph (cathode ray polarograph) resulted in the development of linear sweep voltammetry.[1, 2] In addition to the experimental work, Randles solved a theoretical problem for expressing the current for diffusion-controlled electrochemical reactions by applying an ingenious graphical method.[3]
Another important contribution of Randles to electrochemistry was in the theoretical analysis of Faraday impedance spectra published in 1947.[4] The Randles equivalent circuit has been applied to the analysis of the impedance spectra including interfacial electron transfer (Faradaic component), capacitance and diffusion contributions to the impedance. It became the most frequently used theoretical treatment of impedance spectra. It should be noted that similar results were obtained by Russian scientists Dolin and Erschler in 1940, but the papers published in the Russian language have not been seen by the electrochemical community.
The Randles equivalent circuit (Figure 2) is one of the simplest and most common circuit models of electrochemical impedance. It includes a solution resistance, a double-layer capacitor, and a charge transfer or polarization resistance. While the Randles equivalent circuit is frequently sufficient for modeling simple electrochemical systems, it can be used as a starting point for more sophisticated models, for example, based on more resistances and capacitances organized in parallel or in a sequence.
It should be noted that John Randles was not only working on solving theoretical problems in electrochemistry, but he was a very good experimentalist. As an example of his experimental work, the Volta potential difference between a mercury droplet and an electrolyte solution measured by Randles can be mentioned.[5] Notably, the great Russian electrochemist Alexander Frumkin had failed to obtain a stable and reproducible result for this kind of measurement.
Randles published relatively few papers, but many of them are of great importance and his theoretical treatments of electrochemical systems have been included in all electrochemistry textbooks.
The author declares that he ha
John Edward Brough Randles(图1)是一位英国电化学家,他对极谱法、循环伏安法和电化学阻抗谱的理论背景做出了重要贡献。许多现代电化学技术都是从他的工作中发展而来的,包括循环伏安法、阳极溶出伏安法和各种类型的流体动力学伏安法。用于线性扫描伏安法和循环伏安法的Randles-Ševčík方程和阻抗谱建模的Randles等效电路都是以他的名字命名的。兰德尔斯用示波极谱仪(阴极射线极谱仪)进行的最早的电化学工作导致了线性扫描伏安法的发展。[1,2]在实验工作之外,Randles运用一种巧妙的图解方法解决了扩散控制电化学反应的电流表示的理论问题。[3]兰德尔斯对电化学的另一个重要贡献是1947年发表的法拉第阻抗谱的理论分析。[4]应用兰德尔斯等效电路分析了界面电子转移(法拉第分量)、电容和扩散对阻抗的贡献。它成为阻抗谱最常用的理论处理方法。值得注意的是,俄罗斯科学家Dolin和Erschler在1940年也获得了类似的结果,但电化学学界并没有看到用俄语发表的论文。Randles等效电路(图2)是电化学阻抗最简单、最常见的电路模型之一。它包括溶液电阻、双层电容器和电荷转移或极化电阻。虽然Randles等效电路通常足以模拟简单的电化学系统,但它可以作为更复杂模型的起点,例如,基于并联或顺序组织的更多电阻和电容。值得注意的是,约翰·兰德尔斯不仅致力于解决电化学中的理论问题,而且还是一位非常优秀的实验家。作为他实验工作的一个例子,可以提到兰德尔斯测量的汞滴和电解质溶液之间的伏特电位差。[5]值得注意的是,伟大的俄罗斯电化学家亚历山大·弗鲁姆金(Alexander Frumkin)未能为这种测量获得稳定且可重复的结果。Randles发表的论文相对较少,但其中许多都是非常重要的,他对电化学系统的理论处理被包括在所有的电化学教科书中。作者宣称他没有利益冲突。
{"title":"Electrochemical contributions: John Edward Brough Randles (1912–1998)","authors":"Evgeny Katz","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202300005","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202300005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>John Edward Brough Randles (Figure 1) was an English electrochemist who made important contributions to the theoretical background of polarography, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Many modern techniques of electrochemistry are descended from his work, including cyclic voltammetry, anodic stripping voltammetry, and various types of hydrodynamic voltammetry. The Randles-Ševčík equation applied on linear sweep voltammetry and cyclic voltammetry, and the Randles equivalent circuit used in the modeling of impedance spectra are named after him.</p><p>The earliest electrochemical work of Randles performed with an oscillopolarograph (cathode ray polarograph) resulted in the development of linear sweep voltammetry.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>1, 2</sup></span><sup>]</sup> In addition to the experimental work, Randles solved a theoretical problem for expressing the current for diffusion-controlled electrochemical reactions by applying an ingenious graphical method.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>3</sup></span><sup>]</sup></p><p>Another important contribution of Randles to electrochemistry was in the theoretical analysis of Faraday impedance spectra published in 1947.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>4</sup></span><sup>]</sup> The Randles equivalent circuit has been applied to the analysis of the impedance spectra including interfacial electron transfer (Faradaic component), capacitance and diffusion contributions to the impedance. It became the most frequently used theoretical treatment of impedance spectra. It should be noted that similar results were obtained by Russian scientists Dolin and Erschler in 1940, but the papers published in the Russian language have not been seen by the electrochemical community.</p><p>The Randles equivalent circuit (Figure 2) is one of the simplest and most common circuit models of electrochemical impedance. It includes a solution resistance, a double-layer capacitor, and a charge transfer or polarization resistance. While the Randles equivalent circuit is frequently sufficient for modeling simple electrochemical systems, it can be used as a starting point for more sophisticated models, for example, based on more resistances and capacitances organized in parallel or in a sequence.</p><p>It should be noted that John Randles was not only working on solving theoretical problems in electrochemistry, but he was a very good experimentalist. As an example of his experimental work, the Volta potential difference between a mercury droplet and an electrolyte solution measured by Randles can be mentioned.<sup>[</sup><span><sup>5</sup></span><sup>]</sup> Notably, the great Russian electrochemist Alexander Frumkin had failed to obtain a stable and reproducible result for this kind of measurement.</p><p>Randles published relatively few papers, but many of them are of great importance and his theoretical treatments of electrochemical systems have been included in all electrochemistry textbooks.</p><p>The author declares that he ha","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202300005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49027984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Porous electrodes are essential and high-performance components, which determine the performance of batteries, fuel cells, electrolysis cells, and further electrochemical devices. Improving their performance is a complex endeavor as the situation inside the electrodes is hard to grasp and control. This special collection brings together a series of valuable contributions regarding advanced experimental investigations and modeling studies of porous electrodes used in electrochemical devices for energy applications.
Porous electrodes should provide a sufficiently large surface area for the catalyzed reactions. Very often, the solid porous structure consists of several materials with very different functions such as catalytic activity and electronic or ionic conductivity. The pore system of these electrodes must be optimally designed for the transport of the various reacting species through diffusion, migration, and convection. Moreover, the presence of different phases (liquid electrolytes, gases) in the porous solid matrix of the electrodes leads to an extremely high complexity of the occurring processes. Obviously, there is a great need for improved experimental techniques for the determination of transport parameters and the precise characterization of the porous electrode structures. Based on this information, the development of detailed physicochemically based electrode models will allow for an optimal design of the porous electrodes with even better performance of energy-related electrochemical devices.
The overall 11 contributions in this collection cover different electrochemical applications such as lithium-ion batteries, carbon dioxide electrolysis, fuel cells, supercapacitors, and solar cells. In addition to experimental studies devoted to the characterization of the pore system and the determination of important performance parameters, improved models for electrodes and cells are another focus of this special issue. As guest editors appointed by Electrochemical Science Advances, we would like to thank all authors for their valuable contributions, the reviewers for their thoughtful comments, and the publisher Brian P. Johnson for his kind support. We do hope that this special collection on porous electrodes will provide some useful insights for the future development of improved technologies for energy storage and conversion.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
多孔电极是必不可少的高性能组件,它决定了电池、燃料电池、电解电池和其他电化学设备的性能。由于电极内部的情况难以掌握和控制,提高它们的性能是一项复杂的努力。这个特别的集合汇集了一系列关于先进的实验研究和模拟研究的有价值的贡献,用于能源应用的电化学装置的多孔电极。多孔电极应为催化反应提供足够大的表面积。通常,固体多孔结构由几种具有非常不同功能的材料组成,例如催化活性和电子或离子导电性。这些电极的孔系统必须经过优化设计,以便通过扩散、迁移和对流传输各种反应物质。此外,在电极的多孔固体基质中存在不同的相(液体电解质,气体)导致发生的过程具有极高的复杂性。显然,需要改进实验技术来确定输运参数和精确表征多孔电极结构。基于这些信息,详细的基于物理化学的电极模型的发展将使多孔电极的优化设计具有更好的能量相关电化学装置的性能。本作品集的11个贡献涵盖了不同的电化学应用,如锂离子电池、二氧化碳电解、燃料电池、超级电容器和太阳能电池。除了致力于表征孔隙系统和确定重要性能参数的实验研究外,电极和细胞的改进模型是本专题的另一个重点。作为《电化学科学进展》指定的客座编辑,我们要感谢所有作者的宝贵贡献,感谢审稿人的周到评论,感谢出版商Brian P. Johnson的支持。我们希望这种关于多孔电极的特殊收集将为未来改进的能量存储和转换技术的发展提供一些有用的见解。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Editorial overview: Porous electrodes for energy applications","authors":"Ulrike Krewer, Thomas Turek","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202300001","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202300001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Porous electrodes are essential and high-performance components, which determine the performance of batteries, fuel cells, electrolysis cells, and further electrochemical devices. Improving their performance is a complex endeavor as the situation inside the electrodes is hard to grasp and control. This special collection brings together a series of valuable contributions regarding advanced experimental investigations and modeling studies of porous electrodes used in electrochemical devices for energy applications.</p><p>Porous electrodes should provide a sufficiently large surface area for the catalyzed reactions. Very often, the solid porous structure consists of several materials with very different functions such as catalytic activity and electronic or ionic conductivity. The pore system of these electrodes must be optimally designed for the transport of the various reacting species through diffusion, migration, and convection. Moreover, the presence of different phases (liquid electrolytes, gases) in the porous solid matrix of the electrodes leads to an extremely high complexity of the occurring processes. Obviously, there is a great need for improved experimental techniques for the determination of transport parameters and the precise characterization of the porous electrode structures. Based on this information, the development of detailed physicochemically based electrode models will allow for an optimal design of the porous electrodes with even better performance of energy-related electrochemical devices.</p><p>The overall 11 contributions in this collection cover different electrochemical applications such as lithium-ion batteries, carbon dioxide electrolysis, fuel cells, supercapacitors, and solar cells. In addition to experimental studies devoted to the characterization of the pore system and the determination of important performance parameters, improved models for electrodes and cells are another focus of this special issue. As guest editors appointed by <i>Electrochemical Science Advances</i>, we would like to thank all authors for their valuable contributions, the reviewers for their thoughtful comments, and the publisher Brian P. Johnson for his kind support. We do hope that this special collection on porous electrodes will provide some useful insights for the future development of improved technologies for energy storage and conversion.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202300001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44528610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marcel Pourbaix (Figure 1) was a Belgian chemist (born in Russia) who greatly contributed to studies on corrosion. His biggest achievement is the derivation of potential-pH diagrams, better known as “Pourbaix Diagrams” (Figure 2a). Pourbaix Diagrams are thermodynamic charts constructed using the Nernst equation. They visualize the relationship between possible redox states of a system, bounded by lines representing the reactions between them under thermodynamic equilibrium. The Pourbaix diagrams can be read much like phase diagrams. In 1963, Pourbaix produced “Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions” (Figure 2b), which contains potential-pH diagrams for all elements known at the time. Pourbaix and his collaborators began preparing the work in the early 1950s and continued the diagram updates over many years.
{"title":"Electrochemical contributions: Marcel Pourbaix (1904–1998)","authors":"Evgeny Katz","doi":"10.1002/elsa.202200015","DOIUrl":"10.1002/elsa.202200015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marcel Pourbaix (Figure 1) was a Belgian chemist (born in Russia) who greatly contributed to studies on corrosion. His biggest achievement is the derivation of potential-pH diagrams, better known as “Pourbaix Diagrams” (Figure 2a). Pourbaix Diagrams are thermodynamic charts constructed using the Nernst equation. They visualize the relationship between possible redox states of a system, bounded by lines representing the reactions between them under thermodynamic equilibrium. The Pourbaix diagrams can be read much like phase diagrams. In 1963, Pourbaix produced “Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions” (Figure 2b), which contains potential-pH diagrams for all elements known at the time. Pourbaix and his collaborators began preparing the work in the early 1950s and continued the diagram updates over many years.</p><p>The author declares no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":93746,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/elsa.202200015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47528882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}