Pub Date : 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1177/25785125251366791
Jeremy Weleff, Mohadese Golsorkhi, Mackenzie Griffin, Anahita Bassir Nia, Walter S Mathis
Introduction: In recent years, the impact of recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) on road safety and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) has become a growing area of research, given increasing cannabis legalization and the impact of cannabis on motor control and attention. In 2023, Connecticut legalized recreational cannabis, and this study explored changes in MVAs both in a statewide analysis and in the local vicinity of recreational cannabis dispensaries. Materials and Methods: We conducted an ecological study to assess the impact of recreational cannabis dispensaries on MVAs in Connecticut after legalization on January 10, 2023. Using crash data from Connecticut and Maryland (as a control) for two 24-week periods before and after legalization, we performed a difference-in-differences analysis with negative binomial regression, controlling confounders. At the dispensary level, we compared MVAs within an 800-m radius 8 weeks before and after opening, employing interrupted time series analysis with negative binomial mixed-effects regression models. Results: In the statewide analysis comparing Connecticut with Maryland over two 24-week periods before and after RCL in Connecticut, no significant effect on MVAs was found after adjusting for autocorrelation and seasonal variations (interaction term coefficient = -0.0391, p = 0.0696). In the local analysis, examining accident rates within an 800-m radius of 13 dispensaries over 8 weeks before and after their openings, the negative binomial mixed-effects model showed no significant change (incidence rate ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.64, p = 0.63). Discussion: These findings suggest that cannabis legalization and dispensary openings did not significantly impact motor vehicle accident rates during the study period.
{"title":"Changes in Local Community Spatial Trends of Motor Vehicle Accidents Near Cannabis Dispensaries after Recreational Cannabis Legalization.","authors":"Jeremy Weleff, Mohadese Golsorkhi, Mackenzie Griffin, Anahita Bassir Nia, Walter S Mathis","doi":"10.1177/25785125251366791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251366791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> In recent years, the impact of recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) on road safety and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) has become a growing area of research, given increasing cannabis legalization and the impact of cannabis on motor control and attention. In 2023, Connecticut legalized recreational cannabis, and this study explored changes in MVAs both in a statewide analysis and in the local vicinity of recreational cannabis dispensaries. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We conducted an ecological study to assess the impact of recreational cannabis dispensaries on MVAs in Connecticut after legalization on January 10, 2023. Using crash data from Connecticut and Maryland (as a control) for two 24-week periods before and after legalization, we performed a difference-in-differences analysis with negative binomial regression, controlling confounders. At the dispensary level, we compared MVAs within an 800-m radius 8 weeks before and after opening, employing interrupted time series analysis with negative binomial mixed-effects regression models. <b>Results:</b> In the statewide analysis comparing Connecticut with Maryland over two 24-week periods before and after RCL in Connecticut, no significant effect on MVAs was found after adjusting for autocorrelation and seasonal variations (interaction term coefficient = -0.0391, <i>p</i> = 0.0696). In the local analysis, examining accident rates within an 800-m radius of 13 dispensaries over 8 weeks before and after their openings, the negative binomial mixed-effects model showed no significant change (incidence rate ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.64, <i>p</i> = 0.63). <b>Discussion:</b> These findings suggest that cannabis legalization and dispensary openings did not significantly impact motor vehicle accident rates during the study period.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144803582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-26DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0028
Goran Dujic, Marko Kumric, Josip Vrdoljak, Davorka Sutlovic, Zeljko Dujic, Josko Bozic
Background: The chronic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) supplementation on factors that could impact the quality of life (anxiety, sleeping quality, memory, etc.) are poorly explored. Hence, the aim of this study was to establish whether chronic CBD supplementation will improve self-reported outcomes related to quality of life. Methods: In this randomized crossover trial, 64 patients with primary hypertension were assigned to receive CBD (225-450 mg) for 5 weeks followed by 5 weeks of placebo or vice versa, with a 2-week washout in-between the two. Self-reported outcomes were assessed using short form-36 (SF-36), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), memory complaint questionnaire (MAC-Q), and state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Results: Five-week administration of CBD, but not of placebo, resulted in improvement of ESS score (F = 6.738, p = 0.011), as well as fatigue/vitality (ΔCBD = 5.0, p < 0.001) and psychological well-being dimensions of SF-36 (ΔCBD = 7.4, p = 0.039). No overall benefit of CBD on quality of life was noted (p = 0.674). No changes were seen in total scores of MAC-Q, PSQI, or STAI (p = 0.151, p = 0.862, p = 0.702, respectively). No significant correlations were found between plasma CBD concentrations and any of the scores. Conclusions: Chronic CBD administration reduced excessive daytime sleepiness, despite the fact that no change was observed in self-reported quality of sleep. Furthermore, self-reported fatigue and psychological well-being dimensions of quality of life also improved following chronic CBD use.
{"title":"Chronic Cannabidiol Administration Mitigates Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Fatigue in Patients with Primary Hypertension: Insights from a Randomized Crossover Trial.","authors":"Goran Dujic, Marko Kumric, Josip Vrdoljak, Davorka Sutlovic, Zeljko Dujic, Josko Bozic","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0028","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The chronic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) supplementation on factors that could impact the quality of life (anxiety, sleeping quality, memory, etc.) are poorly explored. Hence, the aim of this study was to establish whether chronic CBD supplementation will improve self-reported outcomes related to quality of life. <b>Methods:</b> In this randomized crossover trial, 64 patients with primary hypertension were assigned to receive CBD (225-450 mg) for 5 weeks followed by 5 weeks of placebo or vice versa, with a 2-week washout in-between the two. Self-reported outcomes were assessed using short form-36 (SF-36), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), memory complaint questionnaire (MAC-Q), and state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). <b>Results:</b> Five-week administration of CBD, but not of placebo, resulted in improvement of ESS score (F = 6.738, <i>p</i> = 0.011), as well as fatigue/vitality (Δ<sub>CBD</sub> = 5.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and psychological well-being dimensions of SF-36 (Δ<sub>CBD</sub> = 7.4, <i>p</i> = 0.039). No overall benefit of CBD on quality of life was noted (<i>p</i> = 0.674). No changes were seen in total scores of MAC-Q, PSQI, or STAI (<i>p</i> = 0.151, <i>p</i> = 0.862, <i>p</i> = 0.702, respectively). No significant correlations were found between plasma CBD concentrations and any of the scores. <b>Conclusions:</b> Chronic CBD administration reduced excessive daytime sleepiness, despite the fact that no change was observed in self-reported quality of sleep. Furthermore, self-reported fatigue and psychological well-being dimensions of quality of life also improved following chronic CBD use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"549-557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-02-26DOI: 10.1089/can.2023.0234
Nicole O'Dell, Amrit Baral, Marvin Reid, Bria-Necole A Diggs, Jessica Y Islam, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Johis Ortega, Denise C Vidot
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted billions of people worldwide, particularly those with chronic health conditions, and has been associated with increases in substance use, including cannabis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cannabis use for symptom management of chronic health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study is an ongoing study among adults ≥18 who self-report cannabis use. Analyses included 1,466 responses received between March 21, 2020, and March 23, 2022, from participants who self-reported cannabis use and a chronic health condition. We examined comorbidities, symptoms managed with cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic, and fear regarding COVID-19 diagnosis and transmission using the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared, and T-tests were conducted. Results were stratified by those who reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition (medicinal cannabis user, n = 1,333) and those who did not use cannabis to manage chronic health condition (non-medicinal cannabis user, n = 133). Results: Most (90.9%, n = 1,333) of the total sample (mean age: 47.1 years [standard deviations {SD} = 15.0]) reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition, of which 46.1% (n = 615) reported having a medical card/recommendation, and 4.6% received recommendations to use cannabis to manage COVID-19 from health professionals. There were significant differences in age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education by medicinal cannabis use status. Comorbidities prevalent among medicinal cannabis consumers were mental health-related (66.1%), pain (58.5%), cardiometabolic-related (30.5%), immune-related (21.9%), and respiratory-related (20.8%). The most reported symptoms self-managed with cannabis during the pandemic were sleep (69.2%), chronic noncancer pain (49.7%), acute pain (46.5%), headaches/migraines (39.0%), muscle spasms (33.6%), nausea/vomiting (30.6%), and appetite stimulant (29.9%). There were no statistical differences in COVID-19 testing, fear of diagnosis, fear of transmission, or isolation due to COVID-19 between medicinal and nonmedicinal cannabis consumers in this sample. Conclusions: The perceived therapeutic benefit of cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident by the high prevalence of adults who reported using cannabis for medicinal reasons despite no recommendation from their health provider. Research is necessary to understand the prospective impact of cannabis use for self-management of chronic disease, especially within the context of COVID-19.
{"title":"Chronic Disease Symptoms Self-Managed by Cannabis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study.","authors":"Nicole O'Dell, Amrit Baral, Marvin Reid, Bria-Necole A Diggs, Jessica Y Islam, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Johis Ortega, Denise C Vidot","doi":"10.1089/can.2023.0234","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2023.0234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted billions of people worldwide, particularly those with chronic health conditions, and has been associated with increases in substance use, including cannabis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cannabis use for symptom management of chronic health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> The COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study is an ongoing study among adults ≥18 who self-report cannabis use. Analyses included 1,466 responses received between March 21, 2020, and March 23, 2022, from participants who self-reported cannabis use and a chronic health condition. We examined comorbidities, symptoms managed with cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic, and fear regarding COVID-19 diagnosis and transmission using the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared, and T-tests were conducted. Results were stratified by those who reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition (medicinal cannabis user, <i>n</i> = 1,333) and those who did not use cannabis to manage chronic health condition (non-medicinal cannabis user, <i>n</i> = 133). <b>Results:</b> Most (90.9%, <i>n</i> = 1,333) of the total sample (mean age: 47.1 years [standard deviations {SD} = 15.0]) reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition, of which 46.1% (<i>n</i> = 615) reported having a medical card/recommendation, and 4.6% received recommendations to use cannabis to manage COVID-19 from health professionals. There were significant differences in age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education by medicinal cannabis use status. Comorbidities prevalent among medicinal cannabis consumers were mental health-related (66.1%), pain (58.5%), cardiometabolic-related (30.5%), immune-related (21.9%), and respiratory-related (20.8%). The most reported symptoms self-managed with cannabis during the pandemic were sleep (69.2%), chronic noncancer pain (49.7%), acute pain (46.5%), headaches/migraines (39.0%), muscle spasms (33.6%), nausea/vomiting (30.6%), and appetite stimulant (29.9%). There were no statistical differences in COVID-19 testing, fear of diagnosis, fear of transmission, or isolation due to COVID-19 between medicinal and nonmedicinal cannabis consumers in this sample. <b>Conclusions:</b> The perceived therapeutic benefit of cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident by the high prevalence of adults who reported using cannabis for medicinal reasons despite no recommendation from their health provider. Research is necessary to understand the prospective impact of cannabis use for self-management of chronic disease, especially within the context of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"558-568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143498940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2024-09-17DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0081
Keisuke Tanaka, Sugarniya Subramaniam, Sharat Atluri, Akwasi A Amoako, Sally Mortlock, Grant W Montgomery, Brett McKinnon
Introduction: Anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are endogenous agonists of the cannabinoid receptors and regulate and control many cellular functions. Their activities are governed by enzymes and proteins that regulate their synthesis, receptor binding, transport, and degradation, which are known as the endocannabinoid system (ECS). The aim of this study was to investigate the regulation of endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium by studying the RNA and protein expression of the ECS within endometrial cell types and during different menstrual cycle stages and the impact of endometriosis. Materials and Methods: The RNA expression of 70 ECS genes was assessed using RNA sequencing of isolated endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Subsequent immunofluorescence-stained endometrial samples on ECS components of interest were objectively analyzed via an agnostic and automated image analysis pipeline to extract quantitative information. Differential gene and protein expression was investigated between the two cell types, menstrual cycle phases, and endometriosis cases and controls. Results: Sufficient RNA expression was detected for 45 genes, and 17 (38%) genes were significantly different between epithelial and stromal cells. FAAH RNA was significantly higher in epithelial cells compared with stromal cells. Protein expression analysis of the main synthesizing (NAPE-PLD) and catabolizing (FAAH and NAAA) enzymes of AEA revealed a significantly stronger epithelial expression compared to stromal cells. The RNA and protein expression of CB1 receptors was very low with no significant difference between epithelial and stromal cells. Eleven ECS genes were regulated across the menstrual cycle, and there was no gene with significant difference between endometriosis cases and controls in epithelial cells. Discussion: Differential expression of ECS genes supports a cell type-specific endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium. As endocannabinoids are short-lived signaling molecules, higher RNA and protein expression of FAAH in the epithelial cells suggests an active regulation of endocannabinoid activity in epithelial cells within the endometrium.
{"title":"Endometrial Cell-Type Specific Regulation of the Endocannabinoids System and the Impact of Menstrual Cycle and Endometriosis.","authors":"Keisuke Tanaka, Sugarniya Subramaniam, Sharat Atluri, Akwasi A Amoako, Sally Mortlock, Grant W Montgomery, Brett McKinnon","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0081","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are endogenous agonists of the cannabinoid receptors and regulate and control many cellular functions. Their activities are governed by enzymes and proteins that regulate their synthesis, receptor binding, transport, and degradation, which are known as the endocannabinoid system (ECS). The aim of this study was to investigate the regulation of endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium by studying the RNA and protein expression of the ECS within endometrial cell types and during different menstrual cycle stages and the impact of endometriosis. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> The RNA expression of 70 ECS genes was assessed using RNA sequencing of isolated endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Subsequent immunofluorescence-stained endometrial samples on ECS components of interest were objectively analyzed <i>via</i> an agnostic and automated image analysis pipeline to extract quantitative information. Differential gene and protein expression was investigated between the two cell types, menstrual cycle phases, and endometriosis cases and controls. <b>Results:</b> Sufficient RNA expression was detected for 45 genes, and 17 (38%) genes were significantly different between epithelial and stromal cells. <i>FAAH</i> RNA was significantly higher in epithelial cells compared with stromal cells. Protein expression analysis of the main synthesizing (NAPE-PLD) and catabolizing (FAAH and NAAA) enzymes of AEA revealed a significantly stronger epithelial expression compared to stromal cells. The RNA and protein expression of CB1 receptors was very low with no significant difference between epithelial and stromal cells. Eleven ECS genes were regulated across the menstrual cycle, and there was no gene with significant difference between endometriosis cases and controls in epithelial cells. <b>Discussion:</b> Differential expression of ECS genes supports a cell type-specific endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium. As endocannabinoids are short-lived signaling molecules, higher RNA and protein expression of FAAH in the epithelial cells suggests an active regulation of endocannabinoid activity in epithelial cells within the endometrium.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"512-526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0104
Parsa Karimi, Maria Sunil, Russell Leong, Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Elyanne Ratcliffe, Gregorio Zuniga-Villanueva
Introduction: The endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in gastrointestinal homeostasis; although some gastrointestinal adverse events have been reported with therapeutic cannabinoids in children, the complete profile of gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population remains unknown. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify the prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events from therapeutic cannabinoids in children. Materials and Methods: A literature search of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library was performed from inception to May 19, 2023. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, uncontrolled before-after studies, and observational retrospective studies in English, French, or Spanish that reported gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population under therapeutic cannabinoid interventions. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. A random-effects model was used to pool and analyze the extracted data. Extracted data included the presence of adverse gastrointestinal events by analyzing the type of cannabinoid, duration of treatment, dosage, and type of study. A subgroup meta-analysis was also performed, focusing on patients' conditions. Results: Twenty-five studies were included, comprising 1,201 pediatric patients receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, of whom 451 experienced gastrointestinal adverse events, representing a cumulative prevalence of 33.91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.49% to 49.04%). Interventional studies reported a higher prevalence of GI adverse events (47.36%; 95% CI: 31% to 64%) compared with observational studies (17.6%; 95% CI: 8.5% to 32.7%). As most studies focused on patients with epilepsy, a subanalysis was performed within this population, revealing that patients with Dravet syndrome had a higher prevalence of diarrhea compared with other types of epilepsy (21.75%; 95% CI: 8.52% to 45.34% vs. 5.95%; 95% CI: 3.11% to 11.1%). Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a high prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events in children receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, with some populations, such as those with Dravet syndrome, being at higher risk than others. With the increased public discourse of cannabinoids being "natural" and mistakenly equating them as "risk-free," this information can help clinicians educate patients and the broader public on the adverse effects profile of these treatments.
内源性大麻素系统在胃肠稳态中起着至关重要的作用;虽然一些胃肠道不良事件的报道与治疗大麻素在儿童中,胃肠道不良事件的完整档案在儿科人群仍然未知。通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,我们旨在确定儿童治疗性大麻素胃肠道不良事件的发生率。材料与方法:检索OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library从成立到2023年5月19日的文献。选择的研究包括随机对照试验、回顾性队列研究、非对照前后研究和观察性回顾性研究,这些研究用英语、法语或西班牙语报道了治疗性大麻素干预下儿科人群的胃肠道不良事件。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,并遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南的首选报告项目。采用随机效应模型对提取的数据进行汇总和分析。通过分析大麻素的类型、治疗持续时间、剂量和研究类型,提取的数据包括不良胃肠道事件的存在。还进行了亚组荟萃分析,重点关注患者的病情。结果:纳入25项研究,包括1,201名接受治疗性大麻素的儿科患者,其中451例出现胃肠道不良事件,累计患病率为33.91%(95%置信区间[CI]: 21.49%至49.04%)。介入研究报告了较高的胃肠道不良事件患病率(47.36%;95% CI: 31%至64%)与观察性研究(17.6%;95% CI: 8.5% ~ 32.7%)。由于大多数研究集中于癫痫患者,因此在该人群中进行了一项亚分析,结果显示,与其他类型的癫痫相比,德拉韦综合征患者的腹泻患病率更高(21.75%;95% CI: 8.52% ~ 45.34% vs. 5.95%;95% CI: 3.11% ~ 11.1%)。讨论:本系统综述和荟萃分析显示,在接受大麻素治疗的儿童中,胃肠道不良事件的发生率很高,其中一些人群,如德拉韦综合征患者,比其他人的风险更高。随着公众越来越多地谈论大麻素是“天然的”,并错误地将其等同于“无风险”,这些信息可以帮助临床医生教育患者和更广泛的公众了解这些治疗的不良影响。
{"title":"Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events of Therapeutic Cannabinoids in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Parsa Karimi, Maria Sunil, Russell Leong, Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Elyanne Ratcliffe, Gregorio Zuniga-Villanueva","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0104","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in gastrointestinal homeostasis; although some gastrointestinal adverse events have been reported with therapeutic cannabinoids in children, the complete profile of gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population remains unknown. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify the prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events from therapeutic cannabinoids in children. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A literature search of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library was performed from inception to May 19, 2023. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, uncontrolled before-after studies, and observational retrospective studies in English, French, or Spanish that reported gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population under therapeutic cannabinoid interventions. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. A random-effects model was used to pool and analyze the extracted data. Extracted data included the presence of adverse gastrointestinal events by analyzing the type of cannabinoid, duration of treatment, dosage, and type of study. A subgroup meta-analysis was also performed, focusing on patients' conditions. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-five studies were included, comprising 1,201 pediatric patients receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, of whom 451 experienced gastrointestinal adverse events, representing a cumulative prevalence of 33.91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.49% to 49.04%). Interventional studies reported a higher prevalence of GI adverse events (47.36%; 95% CI: 31% to 64%) compared with observational studies (17.6%; 95% CI: 8.5% to 32.7%). As most studies focused on patients with epilepsy, a subanalysis was performed within this population, revealing that patients with Dravet syndrome had a higher prevalence of diarrhea compared with other types of epilepsy (21.75%; 95% CI: 8.52% to 45.34% vs. 5.95%; 95% CI: 3.11% to 11.1%). <b>Discussion:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a high prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events in children receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, with some populations, such as those with Dravet syndrome, being at higher risk than others. With the increased public discourse of cannabinoids being \"natural\" and mistakenly equating them as \"risk-free,\" this information can help clinicians educate patients and the broader public on the adverse effects profile of these treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"493-505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2025-06-24DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0175
Alan W J Morris, Raeghan L Mueller, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Angela D Bryan, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Kent E Hutchison
Background: Eicosanoids-lipid mediators derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids such as arachidonic acid-have a notable role in inflammatory signaling. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been shown in preclinical studies to modulate inflammatory pathways the modulating the enzymes that generate eicosanoids, namely lipoxygenase (LOX), cyclooxygenase (COX), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450). Methods: This present study aimed to investigate how CBD and THC effect plasma levels of eicosanoids generated through LOX, COX, and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) pathways. Using plasma sample data from multiple clinical studies, we tested the hypothesis that high-CBD cannabis use would increase eicosanoid levels compared with high-THC cannabis. Results: Following cannabis use, high-CBD cannabis led to a rise in plasma eicosanoids, particularly lipoxins, while high-THC cannabis did not. Conclusions: CBD promoted anti-inflammatory eicosanoid production via the 15-LOX pathway, therefore supporting the potential role of CBD as a therapeutic candidate for inflammatory diseases.
{"title":"Effect of Cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on Anti-Inflammatory Lipid Mediator Synthesis in Humans.","authors":"Alan W J Morris, Raeghan L Mueller, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Angela D Bryan, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Kent E Hutchison","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0175","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Eicosanoids-lipid mediators derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids such as arachidonic acid-have a notable role in inflammatory signaling. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been shown in preclinical studies to modulate inflammatory pathways the modulating the enzymes that generate eicosanoids, namely lipoxygenase (LOX), cyclooxygenase (COX), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450). <b>Methods:</b> This present study aimed to investigate how CBD and THC effect plasma levels of eicosanoids generated through LOX, COX, and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) pathways. Using plasma sample data from multiple clinical studies, we tested the hypothesis that high-CBD cannabis use would increase eicosanoid levels compared with high-THC cannabis. <b>Results:</b> Following cannabis use, high-CBD cannabis led to a rise in plasma eicosanoids, particularly lipoxins, while high-THC cannabis did not. <b>Conclusions:</b> CBD promoted anti-inflammatory eicosanoid production <i>via</i> the 15-LOX pathway, therefore supporting the potential role of CBD as a therapeutic candidate for inflammatory diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"506-511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409267/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144473975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The literature supports the benefits of medical cannabis for core and comorbid symptoms in autistic individuals and anxiety-related symptoms in individuals without autism. However, no study has specifically investigated how cannabidiol (CBD)-rich cannabis affects anxiety subtypes in autistic children or its relationship with restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests (RRBI). Understanding the effects of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on anxiety subtypes and RRBI could offer more precise treatment approaches to managing anxiety symptoms and reducing RRBI frequency in autistic children. Objectives: To examine (1) the impact of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on autistic children's (1a) anxiety levels and subtypes and (1 b) RRBI and subtypes and (2) whether changes in anxiety explain changes in RRBI following cannabis treatment. Method: In this open-label study, we analyzed data from 65 autistic children (5-12 years) who had participated in research on the effects of CBD-rich cannabis on children with autism. Their parents completed the Repetitive Behavior Scale-revised to assess the frequency and severity of six subgroups of their children's recurrent behaviors and the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders for symptoms related to five types of anxiety disorders. They completed these assessments at three time points: (T1) before treatment, (T2) after 3 months, and (T3) after 6 months of treatment. Results: The results indicated reduced RRBI and symptoms related to various anxiety subtypes in autistic children following 6 months of CBD-rich cannabis treatment. Specifically, we observed significant differences in the autistic children's overall anxiety and in some anxiety subtypes (i.e., general, social, panic, and separation anxieties). Significant improvements were observed in RRBI, including the total score, and specifically in compulsive, ritualistic, and sameness behaviors. Our findings revealed that reduced anxiety, particularly within the panic- and separation-related subtypes, predicted a subsequent decrease in RRBI, specifically sameness behaviors, following cannabis treatment. Conclusions: The findings of the cannabis treatment's potential benefits for alleviating anxiety symptoms, leading to reduced RRBI, may provide evidence for the meaningful relationship between these variables and for the potential benefits of cannabis treatment for autistic children. We strongly recommend further double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using standardized assessments to validate these findings.
{"title":"Effects of Medical Cannabis Treatment for Autistic Children on Anxiety and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors and Interests: An Open-Label Study.","authors":"Ayelet David, Orit Stolar, Matitiahu Berkovitch, Elkana Kohn, Ariela Hazan, Danel Waissengreen, Eynat Gal","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0001","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The literature supports the benefits of medical cannabis for core and comorbid symptoms in autistic individuals and anxiety-related symptoms in individuals without autism. However, no study has specifically investigated how cannabidiol (CBD)-rich cannabis affects anxiety subtypes in autistic children or its relationship with restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests (RRBI). Understanding the effects of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on anxiety subtypes and RRBI could offer more precise treatment approaches to managing anxiety symptoms and reducing RRBI frequency in autistic children. <b>Objectives:</b> To examine (1) the impact of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on autistic children's (1a) anxiety levels and subtypes and (1 b) RRBI and subtypes and (2) whether changes in anxiety explain changes in RRBI following cannabis treatment. <b>Method:</b> In this open-label study, we analyzed data from 65 autistic children (5-12 years) who had participated in research on the effects of CBD-rich cannabis on children with autism. Their parents completed the Repetitive Behavior Scale-revised to assess the frequency and severity of six subgroups of their children's recurrent behaviors and the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders for symptoms related to five types of anxiety disorders. They completed these assessments at three time points: (T1) before treatment, (T2) after 3 months, and (T3) after 6 months of treatment. <b>Results:</b> The results indicated reduced RRBI and symptoms related to various anxiety subtypes in autistic children following 6 months of CBD-rich cannabis treatment. Specifically, we observed significant differences in the autistic children's overall anxiety and in some anxiety subtypes (i.e., general, social, panic, and separation anxieties). Significant improvements were observed in RRBI, including the total score, and specifically in compulsive, ritualistic, and sameness behaviors. Our findings revealed that reduced anxiety, particularly within the panic- and separation-related subtypes, predicted a subsequent decrease in RRBI, specifically sameness behaviors, following cannabis treatment. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of the cannabis treatment's potential benefits for alleviating anxiety symptoms, leading to reduced RRBI, may provide evidence for the meaningful relationship between these variables and for the potential benefits of cannabis treatment for autistic children. We strongly recommend further double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using standardized assessments to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"537-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2024-08-28DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0048
Chapman Wei, Nawal Mustafa, Radu Grovu, Fasih Sami Siddiqui, Umesh K Manchandani, Saud Bin Abdul Sattar, Waleed Sadiq, Ahmad Mustafa
Background: Cannabis use is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide, yet the full spectrum of its effects largely remain unknown. Although cannabis have immunomodulatory properties, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of the potential impact of marijuana use on COVID-19 outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of chronic cannabis use on severe COVID-19. Materials and Methods: National Inpatient Sample Database was used to sample individuals admitted with the diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients were divided into two groups based on cannabis use. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were collected using ICD-10 codes. Patients with missing data or age under 18 were excluded. Propensity matching using R was performed to match cannabis users to non-cannabis users 1:1 on age, race, gender, and 17 other comorbidities. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19 infection, defined as a composite of acute respiratory failure, intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or severe sepsis with multiorgan failure. Results: Out of 322,214 patients included in the study, 2,603 were cannabis users. Cannabis users were younger and had higher prevalence of tobacco use. On initial analysis, cannabis users had significantly lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. After 1:1 matching, cannabis use was associated with lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. Conclusion: Cannabis users had better outcomes and mortality compared with non-users. The beneficial effect of cannabis use may be attributed to its immunomodulatory effects.
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship Between Cannabis Use and COVID-19 Outcomes.","authors":"Chapman Wei, Nawal Mustafa, Radu Grovu, Fasih Sami Siddiqui, Umesh K Manchandani, Saud Bin Abdul Sattar, Waleed Sadiq, Ahmad Mustafa","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0048","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cannabis use is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide, yet the full spectrum of its effects largely remain unknown. Although cannabis have immunomodulatory properties, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of the potential impact of marijuana use on COVID-19 outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of chronic cannabis use on severe COVID-19. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> National Inpatient Sample Database was used to sample individuals admitted with the diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients were divided into two groups based on cannabis use. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were collected using ICD-10 codes. Patients with missing data or age under 18 were excluded. Propensity matching using R was performed to match cannabis users to non-cannabis users 1:1 on age, race, gender, and 17 other comorbidities. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19 infection, defined as a composite of acute respiratory failure, intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or severe sepsis with multiorgan failure. <b>Results:</b> Out of 322,214 patients included in the study, 2,603 were cannabis users. Cannabis users were younger and had higher prevalence of tobacco use. On initial analysis, cannabis users had significantly lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. After 1:1 matching, cannabis use was associated with lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cannabis users had better outcomes and mortality compared with non-users. The beneficial effect of cannabis use may be attributed to its immunomodulatory effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"569-573"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142079219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-01Epub Date: 2024-09-17DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0027
Yu Wu, Fei Fang, Xingliang Fan, Hongming Nie
Introduction: Following the introduction of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) as a replacement term for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the relationship between MASLD and cannabis use has yet to be established. With the global rise in cannabis consumption, understanding its impact on MASLD is critical for clinical guidance. Our study investigated the association between cannabis use, MASLD, and clinically significant fibrosis (CSF) among U.S. adults. Methods: Data were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for the period 2017 to 2018 to conduct a cross-sectional analysis. The diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and CSF was based on median values of the controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement, with thresholds of 285 dB/m and 8.6 kPa, respectively. Information on cannabis use was obtained through self-report questionnaires. Multinomial logistic regression models and subgroup analyses were used to investigate the association between cannabis use and MASLD with CSF. Results: Our study assessed data from 2,756 U.S. adults (51.1% female; 32.2% white; mean age 39.41 ± 11.83 years), who had complete information on liver stiffness measurements through transient elastography alongside reported cannabis use. Results indicated that cannabis use overall was not associated with liver stiffness in patients with MASLD. However, among females, cannabis use was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.91). Heavy cannabis use (9 to 30 times per month) was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF among female participants, with an adjusted OR of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.02-0.88). Conclusion: In our study, cannabis use did not show a significant association with liver stiffness in patients diagnosed with MASLD. However, heavy cannabis consumption in women was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF. These findings suggest that the effects of cannabis on liver health may differ based on gender and frequency of cannabis use, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.
{"title":"Associations of Cannabis Use, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, and Liver Fibrosis in U.S. Adults.","authors":"Yu Wu, Fei Fang, Xingliang Fan, Hongming Nie","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0027","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Following the introduction of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) as a replacement term for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the relationship between MASLD and cannabis use has yet to be established. With the global rise in cannabis consumption, understanding its impact on MASLD is critical for clinical guidance. Our study investigated the association between cannabis use, MASLD, and clinically significant fibrosis (CSF) among U.S. adults. <b>Methods:</b> Data were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for the period 2017 to 2018 to conduct a cross-sectional analysis. The diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and CSF was based on median values of the controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement, with thresholds of 285 dB/m and 8.6 kPa, respectively. Information on cannabis use was obtained through self-report questionnaires. Multinomial logistic regression models and subgroup analyses were used to investigate the association between cannabis use and MASLD with CSF. <b>Results:</b> Our study assessed data from 2,756 U.S. adults (51.1% female; 32.2% white; mean age 39.41 ± 11.83 years), who had complete information on liver stiffness measurements through transient elastography alongside reported cannabis use. Results indicated that cannabis use overall was not associated with liver stiffness in patients with MASLD. However, among females, cannabis use was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.91). Heavy cannabis use (9 to 30 times per month) was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF among female participants, with an adjusted OR of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.02-0.88). <b>Conclusion:</b> In our study, cannabis use did not show a significant association with liver stiffness in patients diagnosed with MASLD. However, heavy cannabis consumption in women was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF. These findings suggest that the effects of cannabis on liver health may differ based on gender and frequency of cannabis use, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"527-536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-30DOI: 10.1177/25785125251363813
Flor Alvarado, Dingfen Han, Alan B Zonderman, Michele K Evans, Deidra C Crews
Background: Cannabis is the most used federally controlled substance in the United States. Given the increasingly widespread use of cannabis, further examination of its health implications is needed. We evaluated the association of cannabis use and longitudinal kidney outcomes among a cohort of adults living in Baltimore, MD. Methods: We used data from healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the life span study. Baseline cannabis use (obtained between 2004 and 2009) was categorized as never tried, tried, never used regularly (irregular use), regular use >6 months prior (former regular use), and regular use within the past 6 months (current regular use). The primary outcome was incident chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at follow-up (2013-2017). Risk of rapid kidney function decline (decline in eGFR of >3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year) and incident albuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥ 30 mg/g) were also assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of cannabis use with kidney outcomes. Results: Among 1,521 participants, the mean age was 48 years, 58% were female, and 58% were of Black race. Participants with current regular cannabis use were more likely to be younger, male, Black, and to concurrently use cigarettes, opiates, and/or cocaine. Compared with those with no history of cannabis use, participants with current regular cannabis use were not at higher risk of incident CKD (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.37-1.68]), rapid kidney function decline (OR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.43-1.49), or incident albuminuria (OR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.38-1.87]) after adjustment for sociodemographics, health factors, and concurrent use of cigarette, opiate, or cocaine. Conclusion: In this Baltimore-based cohort of adults without CKD, there was no independent association between cannabis use and adverse kidney outcomes over time.
{"title":"Evaluating the Association of Cannabis Use and Longitudinal Kidney Outcomes.","authors":"Flor Alvarado, Dingfen Han, Alan B Zonderman, Michele K Evans, Deidra C Crews","doi":"10.1177/25785125251363813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251363813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cannabis is the most used federally controlled substance in the United States. Given the increasingly widespread use of cannabis, further examination of its health implications is needed. We evaluated the association of cannabis use and longitudinal kidney outcomes among a cohort of adults living in Baltimore, MD. <b>Methods:</b> We used data from healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the life span study. Baseline cannabis use (obtained between 2004 and 2009) was categorized as never tried, tried, never used regularly (irregular use), regular use >6 months prior (former regular use), and regular use within the past 6 months (current regular use). The primary outcome was incident chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> at follow-up (2013-2017). Risk of rapid kidney function decline (decline in eGFR of >3 mL/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup> per year) and incident albuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥ 30 mg/g) were also assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of cannabis use with kidney outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Among 1,521 participants, the mean age was 48 years, 58% were female, and 58% were of Black race. Participants with current regular cannabis use were more likely to be younger, male, Black, and to concurrently use cigarettes, opiates, and/or cocaine. Compared with those with no history of cannabis use, participants with current regular cannabis use were not at higher risk of incident CKD (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.37-1.68]), rapid kidney function decline (OR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.43-1.49), or incident albuminuria (OR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.38-1.87]) after adjustment for sociodemographics, health factors, and concurrent use of cigarette, opiate, or cocaine. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this Baltimore-based cohort of adults without CKD, there was no independent association between cannabis use and adverse kidney outcomes over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144741276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}