首页 > 最新文献

Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research最新文献

英文 中文
Changes in Local Community Spatial Trends of Motor Vehicle Accidents Near Cannabis Dispensaries after Recreational Cannabis Legalization. 休闲大麻合法化后大麻药房附近社区机动车事故空间趋势变化
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-08 DOI: 10.1177/25785125251366791
Jeremy Weleff, Mohadese Golsorkhi, Mackenzie Griffin, Anahita Bassir Nia, Walter S Mathis

Introduction: In recent years, the impact of recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) on road safety and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) has become a growing area of research, given increasing cannabis legalization and the impact of cannabis on motor control and attention. In 2023, Connecticut legalized recreational cannabis, and this study explored changes in MVAs both in a statewide analysis and in the local vicinity of recreational cannabis dispensaries. Materials and Methods: We conducted an ecological study to assess the impact of recreational cannabis dispensaries on MVAs in Connecticut after legalization on January 10, 2023. Using crash data from Connecticut and Maryland (as a control) for two 24-week periods before and after legalization, we performed a difference-in-differences analysis with negative binomial regression, controlling confounders. At the dispensary level, we compared MVAs within an 800-m radius 8 weeks before and after opening, employing interrupted time series analysis with negative binomial mixed-effects regression models. Results: In the statewide analysis comparing Connecticut with Maryland over two 24-week periods before and after RCL in Connecticut, no significant effect on MVAs was found after adjusting for autocorrelation and seasonal variations (interaction term coefficient = -0.0391, p = 0.0696). In the local analysis, examining accident rates within an 800-m radius of 13 dispensaries over 8 weeks before and after their openings, the negative binomial mixed-effects model showed no significant change (incidence rate ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.64, p = 0.63). Discussion: These findings suggest that cannabis legalization and dispensary openings did not significantly impact motor vehicle accident rates during the study period.

导语:近年来,随着大麻合法化和大麻对运动控制的影响日益受到关注,娱乐性大麻合法化(RCL)对道路安全和机动车事故(MVAs)的影响已成为一个日益增长的研究领域。2023年,康涅狄格州将娱乐性大麻合法化,本研究在全州范围内和娱乐性大麻药房附近探讨了mva的变化。材料与方法:我们进行了一项生态学研究,以评估娱乐性大麻药房在2023年1月10日合法化后对康涅狄格州MVAs的影响。使用康涅狄格州和马里兰州(作为对照)在合法化前后两个24周的崩溃数据,我们使用负二项回归进行了差异中差异分析,控制混杂因素。在药房层面,我们采用中断时间序列分析和负二项混合效应回归模型,比较了开业前后8周800 m半径内的MVAs。结果:在全州范围内比较康涅狄格州和马里兰州在康涅狄格州RCL前后两个24周的分析中,在调整自相关和季节变化后,发现MVAs没有显著影响(相互作用项系数= -0.0391,p = 0.0696)。在局部分析中,对13家药房开业前后8周内800 m半径范围内的事故发生率进行了检测,负二项混合效应模型显示无显著变化(发生率比= 1.10,95%可信区间:0.74-1.64,p = 0.63)。讨论:这些发现表明,在研究期间,大麻合法化和药房开放并没有显著影响机动车事故率。
{"title":"Changes in Local Community Spatial Trends of Motor Vehicle Accidents Near Cannabis Dispensaries after Recreational Cannabis Legalization.","authors":"Jeremy Weleff, Mohadese Golsorkhi, Mackenzie Griffin, Anahita Bassir Nia, Walter S Mathis","doi":"10.1177/25785125251366791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251366791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> In recent years, the impact of recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) on road safety and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) has become a growing area of research, given increasing cannabis legalization and the impact of cannabis on motor control and attention. In 2023, Connecticut legalized recreational cannabis, and this study explored changes in MVAs both in a statewide analysis and in the local vicinity of recreational cannabis dispensaries. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We conducted an ecological study to assess the impact of recreational cannabis dispensaries on MVAs in Connecticut after legalization on January 10, 2023. Using crash data from Connecticut and Maryland (as a control) for two 24-week periods before and after legalization, we performed a difference-in-differences analysis with negative binomial regression, controlling confounders. At the dispensary level, we compared MVAs within an 800-m radius 8 weeks before and after opening, employing interrupted time series analysis with negative binomial mixed-effects regression models. <b>Results:</b> In the statewide analysis comparing Connecticut with Maryland over two 24-week periods before and after RCL in Connecticut, no significant effect on MVAs was found after adjusting for autocorrelation and seasonal variations (interaction term coefficient = -0.0391, <i>p</i> = 0.0696). In the local analysis, examining accident rates within an 800-m radius of 13 dispensaries over 8 weeks before and after their openings, the negative binomial mixed-effects model showed no significant change (incidence rate ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.64, <i>p</i> = 0.63). <b>Discussion:</b> These findings suggest that cannabis legalization and dispensary openings did not significantly impact motor vehicle accident rates during the study period.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144803582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic Cannabidiol Administration Mitigates Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Fatigue in Patients with Primary Hypertension: Insights from a Randomized Crossover Trial. 长期服用大麻二酚可缓解原发性高血压患者白天过度嗜睡和疲劳:一项随机交叉试验的启示。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0028
Goran Dujic, Marko Kumric, Josip Vrdoljak, Davorka Sutlovic, Zeljko Dujic, Josko Bozic

Background: The chronic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) supplementation on factors that could impact the quality of life (anxiety, sleeping quality, memory, etc.) are poorly explored. Hence, the aim of this study was to establish whether chronic CBD supplementation will improve self-reported outcomes related to quality of life. Methods: In this randomized crossover trial, 64 patients with primary hypertension were assigned to receive CBD (225-450 mg) for 5 weeks followed by 5 weeks of placebo or vice versa, with a 2-week washout in-between the two. Self-reported outcomes were assessed using short form-36 (SF-36), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), memory complaint questionnaire (MAC-Q), and state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Results: Five-week administration of CBD, but not of placebo, resulted in improvement of ESS score (F = 6.738, p = 0.011), as well as fatigue/vitality (ΔCBD = 5.0, p < 0.001) and psychological well-being dimensions of SF-36 (ΔCBD = 7.4, p = 0.039). No overall benefit of CBD on quality of life was noted (p = 0.674). No changes were seen in total scores of MAC-Q, PSQI, or STAI (p = 0.151, p = 0.862, p = 0.702, respectively). No significant correlations were found between plasma CBD concentrations and any of the scores. Conclusions: Chronic CBD administration reduced excessive daytime sleepiness, despite the fact that no change was observed in self-reported quality of sleep. Furthermore, self-reported fatigue and psychological well-being dimensions of quality of life also improved following chronic CBD use.

背景:大麻二酚(CBD)的长期补充对可能影响生活质量的因素(焦虑、睡眠质量、记忆力等)的影响尚未得到充分探讨。因此,本研究旨在确定长期补充大麻二酚是否会改善与生活质量相关的自我报告结果。研究方法在这项随机交叉试验中,64 名原发性高血压患者被分配接受为期 5 周的 CBD(225-450 毫克)治疗,然后接受为期 5 周的安慰剂治疗,反之亦然,两者之间有 2 周的缓冲期。自我报告结果采用短表-36(SF-36)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、埃普沃斯嗜睡量表(ESS)、记忆投诉问卷(MAC-Q)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)进行评估。结果显示服用五周 CBD(而非安慰剂)可改善 ESS 评分(F = 6.738,p = 0.011),以及 SF-36 的疲劳/活力(ΔCBD = 5.0,p < 0.001)和心理健康维度(ΔCBD = 7.4,p = 0.039)。CBD对生活质量没有总体益处(p = 0.674)。MAC-Q、PSQI或STAI的总分没有变化(分别为p = 0.151、p = 0.862、p = 0.702)。血浆中的 CBD 浓度与任何评分之间均未发现明显的相关性。结论尽管自我报告的睡眠质量没有变化,但长期服用 CBD 可减少白天过度嗜睡。此外,在长期服用 CBD 后,自我报告的疲劳和心理健康方面的生活质量也有所改善。
{"title":"Chronic Cannabidiol Administration Mitigates Excessive Daytime Sleepiness and Fatigue in Patients with Primary Hypertension: Insights from a Randomized Crossover Trial.","authors":"Goran Dujic, Marko Kumric, Josip Vrdoljak, Davorka Sutlovic, Zeljko Dujic, Josko Bozic","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0028","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The chronic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) supplementation on factors that could impact the quality of life (anxiety, sleeping quality, memory, etc.) are poorly explored. Hence, the aim of this study was to establish whether chronic CBD supplementation will improve self-reported outcomes related to quality of life. <b>Methods:</b> In this randomized crossover trial, 64 patients with primary hypertension were assigned to receive CBD (225-450 mg) for 5 weeks followed by 5 weeks of placebo or vice versa, with a 2-week washout in-between the two. Self-reported outcomes were assessed using short form-36 (SF-36), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), memory complaint questionnaire (MAC-Q), and state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). <b>Results:</b> Five-week administration of CBD, but not of placebo, resulted in improvement of ESS score (F = 6.738, <i>p</i> = 0.011), as well as fatigue/vitality (Δ<sub>CBD</sub> = 5.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and psychological well-being dimensions of SF-36 (Δ<sub>CBD</sub> = 7.4, <i>p</i> = 0.039). No overall benefit of CBD on quality of life was noted (<i>p</i> = 0.674). No changes were seen in total scores of MAC-Q, PSQI, or STAI (<i>p</i> = 0.151, <i>p</i> = 0.862, <i>p</i> = 0.702, respectively). No significant correlations were found between plasma CBD concentrations and any of the scores. <b>Conclusions:</b> Chronic CBD administration reduced excessive daytime sleepiness, despite the fact that no change was observed in self-reported quality of sleep. Furthermore, self-reported fatigue and psychological well-being dimensions of quality of life also improved following chronic CBD use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"549-557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142072095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Chronic Disease Symptoms Self-Managed by Cannabis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study. COVID-19大流行期间大麻自我管理的慢性疾病症状:来自COVID-19大麻健康研究的结果
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI: 10.1089/can.2023.0234
Nicole O'Dell, Amrit Baral, Marvin Reid, Bria-Necole A Diggs, Jessica Y Islam, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Johis Ortega, Denise C Vidot

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted billions of people worldwide, particularly those with chronic health conditions, and has been associated with increases in substance use, including cannabis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cannabis use for symptom management of chronic health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study is an ongoing study among adults ≥18 who self-report cannabis use. Analyses included 1,466 responses received between March 21, 2020, and March 23, 2022, from participants who self-reported cannabis use and a chronic health condition. We examined comorbidities, symptoms managed with cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic, and fear regarding COVID-19 diagnosis and transmission using the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared, and T-tests were conducted. Results were stratified by those who reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition (medicinal cannabis user, n = 1,333) and those who did not use cannabis to manage chronic health condition (non-medicinal cannabis user, n = 133). Results: Most (90.9%, n = 1,333) of the total sample (mean age: 47.1 years [standard deviations {SD} = 15.0]) reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition, of which 46.1% (n = 615) reported having a medical card/recommendation, and 4.6% received recommendations to use cannabis to manage COVID-19 from health professionals. There were significant differences in age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education by medicinal cannabis use status. Comorbidities prevalent among medicinal cannabis consumers were mental health-related (66.1%), pain (58.5%), cardiometabolic-related (30.5%), immune-related (21.9%), and respiratory-related (20.8%). The most reported symptoms self-managed with cannabis during the pandemic were sleep (69.2%), chronic noncancer pain (49.7%), acute pain (46.5%), headaches/migraines (39.0%), muscle spasms (33.6%), nausea/vomiting (30.6%), and appetite stimulant (29.9%). There were no statistical differences in COVID-19 testing, fear of diagnosis, fear of transmission, or isolation due to COVID-19 between medicinal and nonmedicinal cannabis consumers in this sample. Conclusions: The perceived therapeutic benefit of cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident by the high prevalence of adults who reported using cannabis for medicinal reasons despite no recommendation from their health provider. Research is necessary to understand the prospective impact of cannabis use for self-management of chronic disease, especially within the context of COVID-19.

背景:COVID-19 大流行影响了全球数十亿人,特别是那些患有慢性疾病的人,并与包括大麻在内的药物使用增加有关。本研究的目的是估算在 COVID-19 大流行期间为控制慢性疾病症状而使用大麻的流行率。研究方法COVID-19 大麻健康研究是一项针对自我报告使用大麻的 18 岁以上成年人的持续性研究。分析包括 2020 年 3 月 21 日至 2022 年 3 月 23 日期间收到的 1,466 份回复,这些回复来自自我报告使用大麻并患有慢性疾病的参与者。我们使用 COVID-19 大麻健康问卷调查了合并症、COVID-19 流行期间使用大麻控制的症状以及对 COVID-19 诊断和传播的恐惧。对结果进行了描述性统计、卡方检验和 T 检验。结果按报告使用大麻来控制慢性健康状况的人(药用大麻使用者,n = 1,333 人)和不使用大麻来控制慢性健康状况的人(非药用大麻使用者,n = 133 人)进行了分层。结果:总样本中的大多数(90.9%,n = 1 333)(平均年龄:47.1 岁[标准差 {SD} = 15.0])报告使用大麻来控制慢性健康状况,其中 46.1%(n = 615)报告持有医疗卡/建议书,4.6%从医疗专业人员处获得使用大麻控制 COVID-19 的建议。药用大麻使用状况在年龄、性别、种族/民族和教育程度方面存在明显差异。药用大麻使用者普遍存在的并发症包括精神健康相关(66.1%)、疼痛(58.5%)、心脏代谢相关(30.5%)、免疫相关(21.9%)和呼吸系统相关(20.8%)。在大流行期间,报告最多的用大麻自我控制的症状是睡眠(69.2%)、慢性非癌症疼痛(49.7%)、急性疼痛(46.5%)、头痛/偏头痛(39.0%)、肌肉痉挛(33.6%)、恶心/呕吐(30.6%)和食欲不振(29.9%)。在 COVID-19 检测、对诊断的恐惧、对传播的恐惧或因 COVID-19 而被隔离方面,该样本中的药用大麻消费者和非药用大麻消费者之间没有统计学差异。结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,尽管没有医疗服务提供者的建议,但仍有大量成年人报告因药用原因而使用大麻,这表明他们认为大麻具有治疗作用。有必要开展研究,以了解使用大麻对慢性病自我管理的预期影响,特别是在 COVID-19 的背景下。
{"title":"Chronic Disease Symptoms Self-Managed by Cannabis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study.","authors":"Nicole O'Dell, Amrit Baral, Marvin Reid, Bria-Necole A Diggs, Jessica Y Islam, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Johis Ortega, Denise C Vidot","doi":"10.1089/can.2023.0234","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2023.0234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted billions of people worldwide, particularly those with chronic health conditions, and has been associated with increases in substance use, including cannabis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of cannabis use for symptom management of chronic health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> The COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study is an ongoing study among adults ≥18 who self-report cannabis use. Analyses included 1,466 responses received between March 21, 2020, and March 23, 2022, from participants who self-reported cannabis use and a chronic health condition. We examined comorbidities, symptoms managed with cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic, and fear regarding COVID-19 diagnosis and transmission using the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-squared, and T-tests were conducted. Results were stratified by those who reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition (medicinal cannabis user, <i>n</i> = 1,333) and those who did not use cannabis to manage chronic health condition (non-medicinal cannabis user, <i>n</i> = 133). <b>Results:</b> Most (90.9%, <i>n</i> = 1,333) of the total sample (mean age: 47.1 years [standard deviations {SD} = 15.0]) reported using cannabis to manage a chronic health condition, of which 46.1% (<i>n</i> = 615) reported having a medical card/recommendation, and 4.6% received recommendations to use cannabis to manage COVID-19 from health professionals. There were significant differences in age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education by medicinal cannabis use status. Comorbidities prevalent among medicinal cannabis consumers were mental health-related (66.1%), pain (58.5%), cardiometabolic-related (30.5%), immune-related (21.9%), and respiratory-related (20.8%). The most reported symptoms self-managed with cannabis during the pandemic were sleep (69.2%), chronic noncancer pain (49.7%), acute pain (46.5%), headaches/migraines (39.0%), muscle spasms (33.6%), nausea/vomiting (30.6%), and appetite stimulant (29.9%). There were no statistical differences in COVID-19 testing, fear of diagnosis, fear of transmission, or isolation due to COVID-19 between medicinal and nonmedicinal cannabis consumers in this sample. <b>Conclusions:</b> The perceived therapeutic benefit of cannabis during the COVID-19 pandemic is evident by the high prevalence of adults who reported using cannabis for medicinal reasons despite no recommendation from their health provider. Research is necessary to understand the prospective impact of cannabis use for self-management of chronic disease, especially within the context of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"558-568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143498940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endometrial Cell-Type Specific Regulation of the Endocannabinoids System and the Impact of Menstrual Cycle and Endometriosis. 子宫内膜细胞类型对内源性大麻素系统的特定调节以及月经周期和子宫内膜异位症的影响。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0081
Keisuke Tanaka, Sugarniya Subramaniam, Sharat Atluri, Akwasi A Amoako, Sally Mortlock, Grant W Montgomery, Brett McKinnon

Introduction: Anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are endogenous agonists of the cannabinoid receptors and regulate and control many cellular functions. Their activities are governed by enzymes and proteins that regulate their synthesis, receptor binding, transport, and degradation, which are known as the endocannabinoid system (ECS). The aim of this study was to investigate the regulation of endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium by studying the RNA and protein expression of the ECS within endometrial cell types and during different menstrual cycle stages and the impact of endometriosis. Materials and Methods: The RNA expression of 70 ECS genes was assessed using RNA sequencing of isolated endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Subsequent immunofluorescence-stained endometrial samples on ECS components of interest were objectively analyzed via an agnostic and automated image analysis pipeline to extract quantitative information. Differential gene and protein expression was investigated between the two cell types, menstrual cycle phases, and endometriosis cases and controls. Results: Sufficient RNA expression was detected for 45 genes, and 17 (38%) genes were significantly different between epithelial and stromal cells. FAAH RNA was significantly higher in epithelial cells compared with stromal cells. Protein expression analysis of the main synthesizing (NAPE-PLD) and catabolizing (FAAH and NAAA) enzymes of AEA revealed a significantly stronger epithelial expression compared to stromal cells. The RNA and protein expression of CB1 receptors was very low with no significant difference between epithelial and stromal cells. Eleven ECS genes were regulated across the menstrual cycle, and there was no gene with significant difference between endometriosis cases and controls in epithelial cells. Discussion: Differential expression of ECS genes supports a cell type-specific endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium. As endocannabinoids are short-lived signaling molecules, higher RNA and protein expression of FAAH in the epithelial cells suggests an active regulation of endocannabinoid activity in epithelial cells within the endometrium.

简介:安乃近(AEA)和 2-芳香酰甘油是大麻素受体的内源性激动剂,可调节和控制多种细胞功能。它们的活动由调节其合成、受体结合、转运和降解的酶和蛋白质控制,这些酶和蛋白质被称为内源性大麻素系统(ECS)。本研究旨在通过研究子宫内膜细胞类型和不同月经周期阶段中 ECS 的 RNA 和蛋白质表达以及子宫内膜异位症的影响,探讨子宫内膜中内源性大麻素活性的调控。材料与方法:通过对分离的子宫内膜上皮细胞和基质细胞进行 RNA 测序,评估 70 个 ECS 基因的 RNA 表达。随后,通过不可知的自动图像分析管道,对子宫内膜样本中感兴趣的 ECS 成分进行免疫荧光染色,客观分析,以提取定量信息。研究了两种细胞类型、月经周期阶段、子宫内膜异位症病例和对照组之间基因和蛋白质表达的差异。结果显示检测到 45 个基因有足够的 RNA 表达,其中 17 个基因(38%)在上皮细胞和基质细胞之间有显著差异。与基质细胞相比,上皮细胞中的 FAAH RNA 明显更高。对 AEA 的主要合成酶(NAPE-PLD)和分解酶(FAAH 和 NAAA)的蛋白质表达分析表明,上皮细胞的表达明显强于基质细胞。CB1 受体的 RNA 和蛋白表达量很低,上皮细胞和基质细胞之间没有明显差异。有 11 个 ECS 基因在整个月经周期中受到调控,子宫内膜异位症病例和对照组上皮细胞中没有基因存在显著差异。讨论ECS基因的差异表达支持了子宫内膜中细胞类型特异性的内源性大麻素活性。由于内源性大麻素是短暂的信号分子,上皮细胞中 FAAH 的 RNA 和蛋白表达较高,这表明子宫内膜上皮细胞中内源性大麻素的活性受到了积极的调控。
{"title":"Endometrial Cell-Type Specific Regulation of the Endocannabinoids System and the Impact of Menstrual Cycle and Endometriosis.","authors":"Keisuke Tanaka, Sugarniya Subramaniam, Sharat Atluri, Akwasi A Amoako, Sally Mortlock, Grant W Montgomery, Brett McKinnon","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0081","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are endogenous agonists of the cannabinoid receptors and regulate and control many cellular functions. Their activities are governed by enzymes and proteins that regulate their synthesis, receptor binding, transport, and degradation, which are known as the endocannabinoid system (ECS). The aim of this study was to investigate the regulation of endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium by studying the RNA and protein expression of the ECS within endometrial cell types and during different menstrual cycle stages and the impact of endometriosis. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> The RNA expression of 70 ECS genes was assessed using RNA sequencing of isolated endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Subsequent immunofluorescence-stained endometrial samples on ECS components of interest were objectively analyzed <i>via</i> an agnostic and automated image analysis pipeline to extract quantitative information. Differential gene and protein expression was investigated between the two cell types, menstrual cycle phases, and endometriosis cases and controls. <b>Results:</b> Sufficient RNA expression was detected for 45 genes, and 17 (38%) genes were significantly different between epithelial and stromal cells. <i>FAAH</i> RNA was significantly higher in epithelial cells compared with stromal cells. Protein expression analysis of the main synthesizing (NAPE-PLD) and catabolizing (FAAH and NAAA) enzymes of AEA revealed a significantly stronger epithelial expression compared to stromal cells. The RNA and protein expression of CB1 receptors was very low with no significant difference between epithelial and stromal cells. Eleven ECS genes were regulated across the menstrual cycle, and there was no gene with significant difference between endometriosis cases and controls in epithelial cells. <b>Discussion:</b> Differential expression of ECS genes supports a cell type-specific endocannabinoid activity in the endometrium. As endocannabinoids are short-lived signaling molecules, higher RNA and protein expression of FAAH in the epithelial cells suggests an active regulation of endocannabinoid activity in epithelial cells within the endometrium.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"512-526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events of Therapeutic Cannabinoids in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 儿童治疗性大麻素胃肠道不良事件的发生率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0104
Parsa Karimi, Maria Sunil, Russell Leong, Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Elyanne Ratcliffe, Gregorio Zuniga-Villanueva

Introduction: The endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in gastrointestinal homeostasis; although some gastrointestinal adverse events have been reported with therapeutic cannabinoids in children, the complete profile of gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population remains unknown. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify the prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events from therapeutic cannabinoids in children. Materials and Methods: A literature search of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library was performed from inception to May 19, 2023. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, uncontrolled before-after studies, and observational retrospective studies in English, French, or Spanish that reported gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population under therapeutic cannabinoid interventions. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. A random-effects model was used to pool and analyze the extracted data. Extracted data included the presence of adverse gastrointestinal events by analyzing the type of cannabinoid, duration of treatment, dosage, and type of study. A subgroup meta-analysis was also performed, focusing on patients' conditions. Results: Twenty-five studies were included, comprising 1,201 pediatric patients receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, of whom 451 experienced gastrointestinal adverse events, representing a cumulative prevalence of 33.91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.49% to 49.04%). Interventional studies reported a higher prevalence of GI adverse events (47.36%; 95% CI: 31% to 64%) compared with observational studies (17.6%; 95% CI: 8.5% to 32.7%). As most studies focused on patients with epilepsy, a subanalysis was performed within this population, revealing that patients with Dravet syndrome had a higher prevalence of diarrhea compared with other types of epilepsy (21.75%; 95% CI: 8.52% to 45.34% vs. 5.95%; 95% CI: 3.11% to 11.1%). Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a high prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events in children receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, with some populations, such as those with Dravet syndrome, being at higher risk than others. With the increased public discourse of cannabinoids being "natural" and mistakenly equating them as "risk-free," this information can help clinicians educate patients and the broader public on the adverse effects profile of these treatments.

内源性大麻素系统在胃肠稳态中起着至关重要的作用;虽然一些胃肠道不良事件的报道与治疗大麻素在儿童中,胃肠道不良事件的完整档案在儿科人群仍然未知。通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,我们旨在确定儿童治疗性大麻素胃肠道不良事件的发生率。材料与方法:检索OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library从成立到2023年5月19日的文献。选择的研究包括随机对照试验、回顾性队列研究、非对照前后研究和观察性回顾性研究,这些研究用英语、法语或西班牙语报道了治疗性大麻素干预下儿科人群的胃肠道不良事件。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,并遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告指南的首选报告项目。采用随机效应模型对提取的数据进行汇总和分析。通过分析大麻素的类型、治疗持续时间、剂量和研究类型,提取的数据包括不良胃肠道事件的存在。还进行了亚组荟萃分析,重点关注患者的病情。结果:纳入25项研究,包括1,201名接受治疗性大麻素的儿科患者,其中451例出现胃肠道不良事件,累计患病率为33.91%(95%置信区间[CI]: 21.49%至49.04%)。介入研究报告了较高的胃肠道不良事件患病率(47.36%;95% CI: 31%至64%)与观察性研究(17.6%;95% CI: 8.5% ~ 32.7%)。由于大多数研究集中于癫痫患者,因此在该人群中进行了一项亚分析,结果显示,与其他类型的癫痫相比,德拉韦综合征患者的腹泻患病率更高(21.75%;95% CI: 8.52% ~ 45.34% vs. 5.95%;95% CI: 3.11% ~ 11.1%)。讨论:本系统综述和荟萃分析显示,在接受大麻素治疗的儿童中,胃肠道不良事件的发生率很高,其中一些人群,如德拉韦综合征患者,比其他人的风险更高。随着公众越来越多地谈论大麻素是“天然的”,并错误地将其等同于“无风险”,这些信息可以帮助临床医生教育患者和更广泛的公众了解这些治疗的不良影响。
{"title":"Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events of Therapeutic Cannabinoids in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Parsa Karimi, Maria Sunil, Russell Leong, Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Elyanne Ratcliffe, Gregorio Zuniga-Villanueva","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0104","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in gastrointestinal homeostasis; although some gastrointestinal adverse events have been reported with therapeutic cannabinoids in children, the complete profile of gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population remains unknown. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to identify the prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events from therapeutic cannabinoids in children. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A literature search of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library was performed from inception to May 19, 2023. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, uncontrolled before-after studies, and observational retrospective studies in English, French, or Spanish that reported gastrointestinal adverse events in the pediatric population under therapeutic cannabinoid interventions. The study was registered with PROSPERO and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guidelines. A random-effects model was used to pool and analyze the extracted data. Extracted data included the presence of adverse gastrointestinal events by analyzing the type of cannabinoid, duration of treatment, dosage, and type of study. A subgroup meta-analysis was also performed, focusing on patients' conditions. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-five studies were included, comprising 1,201 pediatric patients receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, of whom 451 experienced gastrointestinal adverse events, representing a cumulative prevalence of 33.91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.49% to 49.04%). Interventional studies reported a higher prevalence of GI adverse events (47.36%; 95% CI: 31% to 64%) compared with observational studies (17.6%; 95% CI: 8.5% to 32.7%). As most studies focused on patients with epilepsy, a subanalysis was performed within this population, revealing that patients with Dravet syndrome had a higher prevalence of diarrhea compared with other types of epilepsy (21.75%; 95% CI: 8.52% to 45.34% vs. 5.95%; 95% CI: 3.11% to 11.1%). <b>Discussion:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a high prevalence of gastrointestinal adverse events in children receiving therapeutic cannabinoids, with some populations, such as those with Dravet syndrome, being at higher risk than others. With the increased public discourse of cannabinoids being \"natural\" and mistakenly equating them as \"risk-free,\" this information can help clinicians educate patients and the broader public on the adverse effects profile of these treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"493-505"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143448238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on Anti-Inflammatory Lipid Mediator Synthesis in Humans. 大麻二酚和Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol对人体抗炎脂质介质合成的影响。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0175
Alan W J Morris, Raeghan L Mueller, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Angela D Bryan, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Kent E Hutchison

Background: Eicosanoids-lipid mediators derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids such as arachidonic acid-have a notable role in inflammatory signaling. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been shown in preclinical studies to modulate inflammatory pathways the modulating the enzymes that generate eicosanoids, namely lipoxygenase (LOX), cyclooxygenase (COX), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450). Methods: This present study aimed to investigate how CBD and THC effect plasma levels of eicosanoids generated through LOX, COX, and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) pathways. Using plasma sample data from multiple clinical studies, we tested the hypothesis that high-CBD cannabis use would increase eicosanoid levels compared with high-THC cannabis. Results: Following cannabis use, high-CBD cannabis led to a rise in plasma eicosanoids, particularly lipoxins, while high-THC cannabis did not. Conclusions: CBD promoted anti-inflammatory eicosanoid production via the 15-LOX pathway, therefore supporting the potential role of CBD as a therapeutic candidate for inflammatory diseases.

背景:类二十烷酸是源自花生四烯酸等多不饱和脂肪酸的脂质介质,在炎症信号传导中起着重要作用。大麻二酚(CBD)和Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)已在临床前研究中显示,通过调节产生类二十烷的酶,即脂氧合酶(LOX)、环氧合酶(COX)和细胞色素P450 (CYP450),来调节炎症途径。方法:本研究旨在探讨CBD和四氢大麻酚如何影响血浆中通过LOX、COX和细胞色素P450 (CYP450)途径产生的类二十烷酸的水平。使用来自多个临床研究的血浆样本数据,我们验证了高cbd大麻使用与高thc大麻相比会增加二十烷酸水平的假设。结果:使用大麻后,高cbd大麻导致血浆类二十烷酸增加,特别是脂毒素,而高thc大麻没有。结论:CBD通过15-LOX途径促进抗炎类二十烷酸的产生,因此支持CBD作为炎症性疾病治疗候选药物的潜在作用。
{"title":"Effect of Cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on Anti-Inflammatory Lipid Mediator Synthesis in Humans.","authors":"Alan W J Morris, Raeghan L Mueller, Cristina Sempio, Jost Klawitter, Angela D Bryan, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Kent E Hutchison","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0175","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Eicosanoids-lipid mediators derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids such as arachidonic acid-have a notable role in inflammatory signaling. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been shown in preclinical studies to modulate inflammatory pathways the modulating the enzymes that generate eicosanoids, namely lipoxygenase (LOX), cyclooxygenase (COX), and cytochrome P450 (CYP450). <b>Methods:</b> This present study aimed to investigate how CBD and THC effect plasma levels of eicosanoids generated through LOX, COX, and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) pathways. Using plasma sample data from multiple clinical studies, we tested the hypothesis that high-CBD cannabis use would increase eicosanoid levels compared with high-THC cannabis. <b>Results:</b> Following cannabis use, high-CBD cannabis led to a rise in plasma eicosanoids, particularly lipoxins, while high-THC cannabis did not. <b>Conclusions:</b> CBD promoted anti-inflammatory eicosanoid production <i>via</i> the 15-LOX pathway, therefore supporting the potential role of CBD as a therapeutic candidate for inflammatory diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"506-511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409267/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144473975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of Medical Cannabis Treatment for Autistic Children on Anxiety and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors and Interests: An Open-Label Study. 医用大麻治疗自闭症儿童对焦虑、受限和重复行为及兴趣的影响:一项开放标签研究
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0001
Ayelet David, Orit Stolar, Matitiahu Berkovitch, Elkana Kohn, Ariela Hazan, Danel Waissengreen, Eynat Gal

Background: The literature supports the benefits of medical cannabis for core and comorbid symptoms in autistic individuals and anxiety-related symptoms in individuals without autism. However, no study has specifically investigated how cannabidiol (CBD)-rich cannabis affects anxiety subtypes in autistic children or its relationship with restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests (RRBI). Understanding the effects of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on anxiety subtypes and RRBI could offer more precise treatment approaches to managing anxiety symptoms and reducing RRBI frequency in autistic children. Objectives: To examine (1) the impact of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on autistic children's (1a) anxiety levels and subtypes and (1 b) RRBI and subtypes and (2) whether changes in anxiety explain changes in RRBI following cannabis treatment. Method: In this open-label study, we analyzed data from 65 autistic children (5-12 years) who had participated in research on the effects of CBD-rich cannabis on children with autism. Their parents completed the Repetitive Behavior Scale-revised to assess the frequency and severity of six subgroups of their children's recurrent behaviors and the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders for symptoms related to five types of anxiety disorders. They completed these assessments at three time points: (T1) before treatment, (T2) after 3 months, and (T3) after 6 months of treatment. Results: The results indicated reduced RRBI and symptoms related to various anxiety subtypes in autistic children following 6 months of CBD-rich cannabis treatment. Specifically, we observed significant differences in the autistic children's overall anxiety and in some anxiety subtypes (i.e., general, social, panic, and separation anxieties). Significant improvements were observed in RRBI, including the total score, and specifically in compulsive, ritualistic, and sameness behaviors. Our findings revealed that reduced anxiety, particularly within the panic- and separation-related subtypes, predicted a subsequent decrease in RRBI, specifically sameness behaviors, following cannabis treatment. Conclusions: The findings of the cannabis treatment's potential benefits for alleviating anxiety symptoms, leading to reduced RRBI, may provide evidence for the meaningful relationship between these variables and for the potential benefits of cannabis treatment for autistic children. We strongly recommend further double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using standardized assessments to validate these findings.

背景:文献支持医用大麻对自闭症患者的核心症状和合并症状以及非自闭症患者的焦虑相关症状有好处。然而,还没有研究专门探讨富含大麻二酚(CBD)的大麻如何影响自闭症儿童的焦虑亚型,以及大麻与限制性和重复性行为和兴趣(RRBI)之间的关系。了解富含 CBD 的大麻治疗对焦虑亚型和 RRBI 的影响,可为控制自闭症儿童的焦虑症状和减少 RRBI 频率提供更精确的治疗方法。研究目的研究(1)富含 CBD 的大麻治疗对自闭症儿童(1a)焦虑水平和亚型以及(1b)RRBI 和亚型的影响;(2)焦虑的变化是否可以解释大麻治疗后 RRBI 的变化。研究方法:在这项开放标签研究中,我们分析了 65 名自闭症儿童(5-12 岁)的数据,这些儿童曾参与富含 CBD 的大麻对自闭症儿童的影响研究。他们的父母填写了重复行为量表(修订版),以评估其子女的六组重复行为的频率和严重程度,并填写了儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查表,以评估与五种焦虑症相关的症状。他们在三个时间点完成了这些评估:治疗前(T1)、治疗 3 个月后(T2)和治疗 6 个月后(T3)。结果显示结果表明,经过 6 个月富含 CBD 的大麻治疗后,自闭症儿童的 RRBI 和与各种焦虑亚型相关的症状均有所减轻。具体而言,我们观察到自闭症儿童的总体焦虑和某些焦虑亚型(即一般焦虑、社交焦虑、恐慌焦虑和分离焦虑)存在显著差异。在 RRBI(包括总分),特别是强迫行为、仪式行为和同一性行为方面,我们观察到了显著的改善。我们的研究结果表明,焦虑的减少,尤其是恐慌和分离相关亚型焦虑的减少,预示着大麻治疗后 RRBI,尤其是同一性行为的减少。结论:大麻治疗对缓解焦虑症状的潜在益处可导致 RRBI 的减少,这些研究结果可证明这些变量之间存在有意义的关系,并证明大麻治疗对自闭症儿童的潜在益处。我们强烈建议使用标准化评估进一步开展双盲安慰剂对照研究,以验证这些发现。
{"title":"Effects of Medical Cannabis Treatment for Autistic Children on Anxiety and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors and Interests: An Open-Label Study.","authors":"Ayelet David, Orit Stolar, Matitiahu Berkovitch, Elkana Kohn, Ariela Hazan, Danel Waissengreen, Eynat Gal","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0001","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The literature supports the benefits of medical cannabis for core and comorbid symptoms in autistic individuals and anxiety-related symptoms in individuals without autism. However, no study has specifically investigated how cannabidiol (CBD)-rich cannabis affects anxiety subtypes in autistic children or its relationship with restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests (RRBI). Understanding the effects of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on anxiety subtypes and RRBI could offer more precise treatment approaches to managing anxiety symptoms and reducing RRBI frequency in autistic children. <b>Objectives:</b> To examine (1) the impact of CBD-rich cannabis treatment on autistic children's (1a) anxiety levels and subtypes and (1 b) RRBI and subtypes and (2) whether changes in anxiety explain changes in RRBI following cannabis treatment. <b>Method:</b> In this open-label study, we analyzed data from 65 autistic children (5-12 years) who had participated in research on the effects of CBD-rich cannabis on children with autism. Their parents completed the Repetitive Behavior Scale-revised to assess the frequency and severity of six subgroups of their children's recurrent behaviors and the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders for symptoms related to five types of anxiety disorders. They completed these assessments at three time points: (T1) before treatment, (T2) after 3 months, and (T3) after 6 months of treatment. <b>Results:</b> The results indicated reduced RRBI and symptoms related to various anxiety subtypes in autistic children following 6 months of CBD-rich cannabis treatment. Specifically, we observed significant differences in the autistic children's overall anxiety and in some anxiety subtypes (i.e., general, social, panic, and separation anxieties). Significant improvements were observed in RRBI, including the total score, and specifically in compulsive, ritualistic, and sameness behaviors. Our findings revealed that reduced anxiety, particularly within the panic- and separation-related subtypes, predicted a subsequent decrease in RRBI, specifically sameness behaviors, following cannabis treatment. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of the cannabis treatment's potential benefits for alleviating anxiety symptoms, leading to reduced RRBI, may provide evidence for the meaningful relationship between these variables and for the potential benefits of cannabis treatment for autistic children. We strongly recommend further double-blind, placebo-controlled studies using standardized assessments to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"537-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Relationship Between Cannabis Use and COVID-19 Outcomes. 探索大麻使用与 COVID-19 结果之间的关系。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0048
Chapman Wei, Nawal Mustafa, Radu Grovu, Fasih Sami Siddiqui, Umesh K Manchandani, Saud Bin Abdul Sattar, Waleed Sadiq, Ahmad Mustafa

Background: Cannabis use is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide, yet the full spectrum of its effects largely remain unknown. Although cannabis have immunomodulatory properties, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of the potential impact of marijuana use on COVID-19 outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of chronic cannabis use on severe COVID-19. Materials and Methods: National Inpatient Sample Database was used to sample individuals admitted with the diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients were divided into two groups based on cannabis use. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were collected using ICD-10 codes. Patients with missing data or age under 18 were excluded. Propensity matching using R was performed to match cannabis users to non-cannabis users 1:1 on age, race, gender, and 17 other comorbidities. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19 infection, defined as a composite of acute respiratory failure, intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or severe sepsis with multiorgan failure. Results: Out of 322,214 patients included in the study, 2,603 were cannabis users. Cannabis users were younger and had higher prevalence of tobacco use. On initial analysis, cannabis users had significantly lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. After 1:1 matching, cannabis use was associated with lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. Conclusion: Cannabis users had better outcomes and mortality compared with non-users. The beneficial effect of cannabis use may be attributed to its immunomodulatory effects.

背景:大麻的使用在全球范围内日益盛行,但其全部影响在很大程度上仍不为人所知。虽然大麻具有免疫调节特性,但我们对吸食大麻对 COVID-19 结果的潜在影响的认识仍有很大差距。本研究旨在评估长期吸食大麻对重症 COVID-19 的影响。材料和方法:使用全国住院病人抽样数据库对诊断为 COVID-19 的住院病人进行抽样。根据大麻使用情况将患者分为两组。使用 ICD-10 编码收集基线人口统计数据和合并症。数据缺失或年龄小于 18 岁的患者被排除在外。使用 R 进行倾向匹配,根据年龄、种族、性别和其他 17 种合并症,将大麻使用者与非大麻使用者按 1:1 进行匹配。主要结果为严重 COVID-19 感染,定义为急性呼吸衰竭、插管、急性呼吸窘迫综合征 (ARDS) 或伴有多器官功能衰竭的严重败血症的综合征。研究结果在纳入研究的 322,214 名患者中,有 2,603 人吸食大麻。大麻使用者更年轻,吸烟率更高。初步分析显示,大麻使用者的 COVID-19 严重感染率、插管率、ARDS、急性呼吸衰竭、严重败血症合并多器官功能衰竭、死亡率和住院时间均明显较低。经过 1:1 配对后,吸食大麻与较低的 COVID-19 严重感染率、插管率、ARDS、急性呼吸衰竭、严重败血症合并多器官功能衰竭、死亡率和较短的住院时间相关。结论与不吸食大麻者相比,吸食大麻者的治疗效果和死亡率更好。吸食大麻的益处可能归因于其免疫调节作用。
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship Between Cannabis Use and COVID-19 Outcomes.","authors":"Chapman Wei, Nawal Mustafa, Radu Grovu, Fasih Sami Siddiqui, Umesh K Manchandani, Saud Bin Abdul Sattar, Waleed Sadiq, Ahmad Mustafa","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0048","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cannabis use is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide, yet the full spectrum of its effects largely remain unknown. Although cannabis have immunomodulatory properties, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of the potential impact of marijuana use on COVID-19 outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of chronic cannabis use on severe COVID-19. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> National Inpatient Sample Database was used to sample individuals admitted with the diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients were divided into two groups based on cannabis use. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were collected using ICD-10 codes. Patients with missing data or age under 18 were excluded. Propensity matching using R was performed to match cannabis users to non-cannabis users 1:1 on age, race, gender, and 17 other comorbidities. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19 infection, defined as a composite of acute respiratory failure, intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or severe sepsis with multiorgan failure. <b>Results:</b> Out of 322,214 patients included in the study, 2,603 were cannabis users. Cannabis users were younger and had higher prevalence of tobacco use. On initial analysis, cannabis users had significantly lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. After 1:1 matching, cannabis use was associated with lower rates of severe COVID-19 infection, intubation, ARDS, acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis with multiorgan failure, mortality, and shorter length of hospital stay. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cannabis users had better outcomes and mortality compared with non-users. The beneficial effect of cannabis use may be attributed to its immunomodulatory effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"569-573"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142079219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations of Cannabis Use, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, and Liver Fibrosis in U.S. Adults. 美国成年人吸食大麻、代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病和肝纤维化的相关性。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1089/can.2024.0027
Yu Wu, Fei Fang, Xingliang Fan, Hongming Nie

Introduction: Following the introduction of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) as a replacement term for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the relationship between MASLD and cannabis use has yet to be established. With the global rise in cannabis consumption, understanding its impact on MASLD is critical for clinical guidance. Our study investigated the association between cannabis use, MASLD, and clinically significant fibrosis (CSF) among U.S. adults. Methods: Data were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for the period 2017 to 2018 to conduct a cross-sectional analysis. The diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and CSF was based on median values of the controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement, with thresholds of 285 dB/m and 8.6 kPa, respectively. Information on cannabis use was obtained through self-report questionnaires. Multinomial logistic regression models and subgroup analyses were used to investigate the association between cannabis use and MASLD with CSF. Results: Our study assessed data from 2,756 U.S. adults (51.1% female; 32.2% white; mean age 39.41 ± 11.83 years), who had complete information on liver stiffness measurements through transient elastography alongside reported cannabis use. Results indicated that cannabis use overall was not associated with liver stiffness in patients with MASLD. However, among females, cannabis use was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.91). Heavy cannabis use (9 to 30 times per month) was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF among female participants, with an adjusted OR of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.02-0.88). Conclusion: In our study, cannabis use did not show a significant association with liver stiffness in patients diagnosed with MASLD. However, heavy cannabis consumption in women was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF. These findings suggest that the effects of cannabis on liver health may differ based on gender and frequency of cannabis use, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.

简介:代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)作为非酒精性脂肪肝的替代术语问世后,代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病与吸食大麻之间的关系尚未确定。随着全球大麻消费的增加,了解大麻对 MASLD 的影响对临床指导至关重要。我们的研究调查了美国成年人中大麻使用、MASLD 和临床显著纤维化(CSF)之间的关系。研究方法从 2017 年至 2018 年期间的美国国家健康与营养调查中收集数据,进行横断面分析。肝脏脂肪变性和 CSF 的诊断基于受控衰减参数和肝脏硬度测量的中值,阈值分别为 285 dB/m 和 8.6 kPa。关于大麻使用情况的信息通过自我报告问卷获得。采用多项式逻辑回归模型和亚组分析来研究吸食大麻与伴有CSF的MASLD之间的关系。研究结果我们的研究评估了 2,756 名美国成年人(51.1% 为女性;32.2% 为白人;平均年龄为 39.41 ± 11.83 岁)的数据,这些人在报告使用大麻的同时,还通过瞬态弹性成像提供了完整的肝脏硬度测量信息。结果表明,吸食大麻总体上与 MASLD 患者的肝脏僵硬度无关。然而,在女性患者中,吸食大麻与伴有 CSF 的 MASLD 相关,调整后的几率比 (OR) 为 0.47(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.24-0.91)。在女性参与者中,大量使用大麻(每月 9 至 30 次)与伴有 CSF 的 MASLD 相关,调整后的 OR 为 0.12(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.02-0.88)。结论在我们的研究中,在确诊为 MASLD 的患者中,吸食大麻与肝硬变并无明显关联。然而,女性大量吸食大麻与伴有 CSF 的 MASLD 有关。这些研究结果表明,吸食大麻对肝脏健康的影响可能因性别和吸食大麻的频率而异,因此需要在这一领域开展进一步的研究。
{"title":"Associations of Cannabis Use, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, and Liver Fibrosis in U.S. Adults.","authors":"Yu Wu, Fei Fang, Xingliang Fan, Hongming Nie","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0027","DOIUrl":"10.1089/can.2024.0027","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Following the introduction of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) as a replacement term for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the relationship between MASLD and cannabis use has yet to be established. With the global rise in cannabis consumption, understanding its impact on MASLD is critical for clinical guidance. Our study investigated the association between cannabis use, MASLD, and clinically significant fibrosis (CSF) among U.S. adults. <b>Methods:</b> Data were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for the period 2017 to 2018 to conduct a cross-sectional analysis. The diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and CSF was based on median values of the controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement, with thresholds of 285 dB/m and 8.6 kPa, respectively. Information on cannabis use was obtained through self-report questionnaires. Multinomial logistic regression models and subgroup analyses were used to investigate the association between cannabis use and MASLD with CSF. <b>Results:</b> Our study assessed data from 2,756 U.S. adults (51.1% female; 32.2% white; mean age 39.41 ± 11.83 years), who had complete information on liver stiffness measurements through transient elastography alongside reported cannabis use. Results indicated that cannabis use overall was not associated with liver stiffness in patients with MASLD. However, among females, cannabis use was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.91). Heavy cannabis use (9 to 30 times per month) was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF among female participants, with an adjusted OR of 0.12 (95% CI: 0.02-0.88). <b>Conclusion:</b> In our study, cannabis use did not show a significant association with liver stiffness in patients diagnosed with MASLD. However, heavy cannabis consumption in women was associated with MASLD accompanied by CSF. These findings suggest that the effects of cannabis on liver health may differ based on gender and frequency of cannabis use, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"527-536"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Association of Cannabis Use and Longitudinal Kidney Outcomes. 评估大麻使用与纵向肾脏预后的关系。
IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI: 10.1177/25785125251363813
Flor Alvarado, Dingfen Han, Alan B Zonderman, Michele K Evans, Deidra C Crews

Background: Cannabis is the most used federally controlled substance in the United States. Given the increasingly widespread use of cannabis, further examination of its health implications is needed. We evaluated the association of cannabis use and longitudinal kidney outcomes among a cohort of adults living in Baltimore, MD. Methods: We used data from healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the life span study. Baseline cannabis use (obtained between 2004 and 2009) was categorized as never tried, tried, never used regularly (irregular use), regular use >6 months prior (former regular use), and regular use within the past 6 months (current regular use). The primary outcome was incident chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at follow-up (2013-2017). Risk of rapid kidney function decline (decline in eGFR of >3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year) and incident albuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥ 30 mg/g) were also assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of cannabis use with kidney outcomes. Results: Among 1,521 participants, the mean age was 48 years, 58% were female, and 58% were of Black race. Participants with current regular cannabis use were more likely to be younger, male, Black, and to concurrently use cigarettes, opiates, and/or cocaine. Compared with those with no history of cannabis use, participants with current regular cannabis use were not at higher risk of incident CKD (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.37-1.68]), rapid kidney function decline (OR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.43-1.49), or incident albuminuria (OR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.38-1.87]) after adjustment for sociodemographics, health factors, and concurrent use of cigarette, opiate, or cocaine. Conclusion: In this Baltimore-based cohort of adults without CKD, there was no independent association between cannabis use and adverse kidney outcomes over time.

背景:大麻是美国使用最多的联邦管制物质。鉴于大麻的使用日益广泛,需要进一步审查其对健康的影响。我们在马里兰州巴尔的摩的一组成年人中评估了大麻使用与纵向肾脏结局的关系。方法:我们使用了来自不同社区的健康老龄化数据。基线大麻使用(2004年至2009年期间获得)分为从未尝试过、尝试过、从未经常使用(不规则使用)、6个月前经常使用(以前经常使用)和过去6个月内经常使用(目前经常使用)。主要终点是慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的发生率,定义为随访(2013-2017)时估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR) 2。还评估了肾功能快速下降的风险(eGFR每年每1.73 m2下降bb0.3 mL/min)和蛋白尿事件(白蛋白与肌酐比值[ACR]≥30 mg/g)。多变量logistic回归用于评估大麻使用与肾脏预后的关系。结果:在1521名参与者中,平均年龄为48岁,58%为女性,58%为黑人。目前经常使用大麻的参与者更有可能是年轻、男性、黑人,同时使用香烟、阿片类药物和/或可卡因。与没有大麻使用史的参与者相比,目前经常使用大麻的参与者在调整社会人口统计学、健康因素和同时使用香烟、阿片类药物或可卡因后,发生CKD (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.37-1.68])、肾功能快速下降(OR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.43-1.49)或蛋白尿(OR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.38-1.87])的风险并不更高。结论:在巴尔的摩无CKD的成人队列中,大麻使用与长期不良肾脏结局之间没有独立关联。
{"title":"Evaluating the Association of Cannabis Use and Longitudinal Kidney Outcomes.","authors":"Flor Alvarado, Dingfen Han, Alan B Zonderman, Michele K Evans, Deidra C Crews","doi":"10.1177/25785125251363813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125251363813","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cannabis is the most used federally controlled substance in the United States. Given the increasingly widespread use of cannabis, further examination of its health implications is needed. We evaluated the association of cannabis use and longitudinal kidney outcomes among a cohort of adults living in Baltimore, MD. <b>Methods:</b> We used data from healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the life span study. Baseline cannabis use (obtained between 2004 and 2009) was categorized as never tried, tried, never used regularly (irregular use), regular use >6 months prior (former regular use), and regular use within the past 6 months (current regular use). The primary outcome was incident chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> at follow-up (2013-2017). Risk of rapid kidney function decline (decline in eGFR of >3 mL/min per 1.73 m<sup>2</sup> per year) and incident albuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥ 30 mg/g) were also assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of cannabis use with kidney outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Among 1,521 participants, the mean age was 48 years, 58% were female, and 58% were of Black race. Participants with current regular cannabis use were more likely to be younger, male, Black, and to concurrently use cigarettes, opiates, and/or cocaine. Compared with those with no history of cannabis use, participants with current regular cannabis use were not at higher risk of incident CKD (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.37-1.68]), rapid kidney function decline (OR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.43-1.49), or incident albuminuria (OR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.38-1.87]) after adjustment for sociodemographics, health factors, and concurrent use of cigarette, opiate, or cocaine. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this Baltimore-based cohort of adults without CKD, there was no independent association between cannabis use and adverse kidney outcomes over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144741276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1