Annals of the American Thoracic Society最新文献

Rationale: Fibrosing mediastinitis (FM) is an uncommon fibroinflammatory condition without established or effective medical therapies. Infiltrating B lymphocytes are commonly present, and progressive fibrosis compromises mediastinal structures, including blood vessels and airways, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Objective: To evaluate the benefits and side effects of rituximab in patients with progressive and symptomatic FM. Methods: We treated 22 patients (median age, 35 yr; range, 15-68 yr; 45% female) with metabolically active, progressive FM with rituximab on an off-label basis. Additionally, patients were administered pneumocystis and antifungal prophylaxis when immunosuppressed with rituximab. Modeling of longitudinal treatment response based on changes in relative lesion volume from baseline was performed retrospectively using functional data analysis, and time-to-event modeling was performed to estimate treatment response rates based on a >30% reduction in pretreatment volume. The primary endpoints were lack of disease progression and change in mediastinal lesion volume on computed tomography (evaluated retrospectively). Results: No patient experienced disease progression after rituximab therapy. Median clinical follow-up was 42 months (range, 7-94 mo) and imaging follow-up 21 months (range, 7-62 mo). A total of 82% of patients had confirmed histoplasmosis-associated FM. After rituximab treatment, a 49.6% (95% confidence interval, 17.5-64.4%) mean estimated decrease in pretreatment lesion volume was observed at 24 months. The estimated objective treatment response rate was 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.7-70.3%). Conclusions: This observational study suggests that rituximab is a well tolerated and potentially effective therapy in a cohort of patients with symptomatic and progressive FM.

Rationale: High costs of controller therapies may be a barrier to guideline-recommended asthma treatment. Objectives: We determined whether eliminating out-of-pocket (OOP) payments among low-income patients with asthma impacted controller medication use. Methods: We applied a controlled interrupted time series design to administrative claims data in British Columbia, Canada from 2017 to 2020. Cases were individuals with an annual household income <$13,750 in whom copays were eliminated in January 2019; there was no change in public coverage for the control group with annual income >$45,000. We evaluated trends in asthma medication costs, use, the ratio of inhaled corticosteroid-containing medications to all asthma medications, excessive use of short-acting β-agonists (more than one canister per month), and the proportion of days covered by controller therapies. Results: There were 12,940 cases (62% female; mean age, 30.3 yr; standard deviation [SD], 14.9) and 71,331 controls (55% female; mean age, 31.3 yr; SD, 16.3). Removal of OOP payments increased monthly mean medication costs by $3.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], $0.08 to $6.56, 2020 Canadian dollars), days' supply of controller medications by 1.50 days (95% CI, 0.61 to 2.40 d), and the ratio of inhaled corticosteroid-containing medications to total medications by 4.20% (95% CI, 0.73% to 7.66%) compared with the control group. The policy had no effect on the proportion of days covered by controller therapies (0.01; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.04), but nonsignificantly decreased the percentage of patients with excessive short-acting β-agonist use (-6.37%; 95% CI, -12.90% to 0.16%). Conclusions: Removal of OOP payments increased the dispensation of controller therapies, suggesting cost-related nonadherence could impair optimal asthma management.

Rationale: Current critical care practice does not integrate social determinants of health (SDOH) in systematic or standardized ways. Routine assessment of SDOH in the intensive care unit (ICU) may improve clinical decision making, patient- and family-centered outcomes, and clinician well-being. Objective: Given that the appropriateness and feasibility of SDOH assessment in the ICU is unknown, we aimed to understand how ICU clinicians think about and use SDOH. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians focused on barriers to and facilitators of assessing SDOH during critical illness and perceptions of screening for SDOH in the ICU. We used chart-stimulated recall to assist clinicians in reflecting on how SDOH applied to and was used in patients' care. After deidentifying interviews, we analyzed transcripts guided by a thematic analysis approach using a combination of inductive and deductive coding, the latter framed within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SDOH Healthy People framework. Results: We completed interviews with 30 clinicians in a variety of professional roles. The majority of clinicians self-identified as men (n = 17; 56.7%) of White race (n = 25; 83.3%). Clinicians contextualize their use of SDOH within three frames of reference: 1) their own identity and experiences; 2) their relationships and communication with patients and caregivers; and 3) immediate structures of care around ICU patients, including clinician advocacy, care transitions, and readmission. Clinicians identified that discussing SDOH could allow them to recognize bias faced by their patients, elucidate drivers of critical illness, and navigate communication with patients' caregivers. Clinicians worried about ICU-specific factors impeding the discussion of SDOH, including time constraints and acuity, high stakes and emotions, and negative anticipatory emotions. Conclusions: Clinicians gather SDOH during critical illness both to understand their patients' stories and to provide individualized care, which may lead to better clinician satisfaction and patient- and family-centered care outcomes. Educational and operational efforts to increase SDOH assessment and use in critical care should also gather and integrate the perspectives of patients and caregivers regarding the collection and use of SDOH in the ICU.

Rationale: Meta-analyses have suggested the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events is significantly higher after a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation. However, many of these studies have included a broad array of CVD events or have been limited to highly selected patient populations potentially not generalizable to the broader population of COPD. Objectives and Methods: We assessed the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) hospitalizations after COPD hospitalization compared with before COPD hospitalization and identified patient factors associated with ASCVD hospitalizations after COPD hospitalization. This retrospective cohort study used claims data from 920,550 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for COPD from 2016 to 2019 in the United States. The primary outcome was risk of an ASCVD hospitalization composite outcome (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, stroke, or transient ischemic attack) in the 30 days and 1 year after COPD hospitalization relative to the same time period before COPD hospitalization. Time in the before and after COPD hospitalization time periods to a composite ASCVD hospitalization outcome were modeled using an extension of the Cox proportional hazards model, the Anderson-Gill model, with adjustment for patient characteristics. Additional analyses evaluated for interactions in subgroups associated with the composite ASCVD hospitalization outcome. Results: Among 920,550 patients in the 30-day and 1-year cohorts (mean age, 73-74 yr) the hazard ratio estimate (95% confidence interval) for the composite ASCVD hospitalization outcome after COPD hospitalization versus before COPD hospitalization for the 30-day cohort was 0.99 (0.93, 1.05; P = 0.67), and for the 1-year cohort, it was 0.99 (0.97, 1.02; P = 0.53) after adjustment. We observed three subgroups that were significantly associated with higher risk for ASCVD hospitalizations 1 year after COPD hospitalization: 76+ years old, women, and COPD hospitalization severity. Conclusions: Among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for COPD, the risk of ASCVD hospitalization was not significantly increased 30 days or 1 year after COPD hospitalization relative to before COPD hospitalization. In subgroup analyses, we identified age 76+ years old, female sex, and COPD hospitalization severity as high-risk subgroups with increased risk of ASCVD events 1 year after COPD hospitalization. Further research is needed to characterize the COPD exacerbation populations at highest ASCVD hospitalization risk.

Rationale: Three-year continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy termination rates are up to 50%, and therapy termination is associated with higher all-cause mortality and incident cardiovascular event risk. Objectives: This study investigated the impact of CPAP therapy termination in the first year on long sick leave leading to permanent work disability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea based on data from the Nationwide Claims Data Lake for Sleep Apnoea (ALASKA). Methods: French national health insurance reimbursement system data were analyzed for all adults with OSA aged ≤62 years who started CPAP therapy in France in 2015 and 2016. CPAP therapy termination was defined as the cessation of CPAP reimbursements triggered by the respiratory physician or sleep specialist in charge of follow-up. Individuals who terminated therapy were compared with those who continued to use CPAP. The primary outcome was sick leave ultimately leading to permanent work disability. A multivariable Fine and Gray model, adjusted for age, sex, cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, depression, and CPAP prescriber clinical specialty was used to assess the risk of long-term sick leave leading to permanent work disability over 3 years' follow-up. Results: The analysis included 174,270 individuals (median age, 52.0 yr [interquartile range, 44.0-57.0 yr]; 67.5% male). The 1-year CPAP therapy termination rate was 22.3%. The proportion of individuals with long-term sick leave leading to permanent work disability was significantly higher in the CPAP termination versus continuation group (0.60% vs. 0.52%; P = 0.042). In an adjusted multivariable Cox model, CPAP termination was associated with an increased risk of permanent work disability (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.41; P = 0.01), primarily in the subgroup aged >55 years (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.06-1.87; P = 0.02). Conclusions: These real-world data from a comprehensive, unbiased database highlight the potential occupational impact of CPAP therapy termination.