Canadian journal of diabetes最新文献

Objective: Our aim in this study was to determine whether there are differences in glycemia during wound and wound-free states among individuals with diabetes at a multidisciplinary diabetic foot and wound clinic from 2012 to 2019.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data over 7.4 years from the Johns Hopkins Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot and Wound Clinic. Participants with diabetic foot ulcers were observed during at least one wound period and one wound-free period and had at least one glycated hemoglobin (A1C) measurement in both a wound and wound-free period. The A1C measurements were aggregated and summarized across wound and wound-free periods, and compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

Results: Two hundred six eligible participants with a total of 623 wounds were included in this analysis. Participants were followed for a median period of 2.4 years (876 days). There were no significant differences in mean, minimum, and maximum A1C between the aggregate wound and wound-free periods, with median values of 7.6% (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6% to 9.1%) and 7.5% (IQR 6.6% to 9.1%) for mean A1C (p=0.43), 6.9% (IQR 6.0% to 8.0%) and 6.8% (6.0% to 8.1%) for minimum A1C (p=0.78), and 8.6% (IQR 7.1% to 10.9%) and 8.5% (IQR 7.0% to 10.7%) for maximum A1C (p=0.06) in the wound and wound-free periods, respectively.

Conclusions: This retrospective study shows similar levels of A1C during wound and wound-free periods; however, given the limitations of missing A1C and small sample size, further studies leveraging continuous glucose monitoring are needed to determine whether glycemia worsens in the setting of a DFU.

Objectives: Closed-loop insulin delivery has the potential to offer women with type 1 diabetes a break from intense diabetes self-care efforts postpartum. Our aim in this study was to explore the views and opinions of hybrid closed-loop users and their partners in the first 24 weeks postpartum.

Methods: This qualitative study was embedded in a controlled study of women with type 1 diabetes randomized to closed-loop insulin delivery (MiniMed™ 670G or 770G) or sensor-augmented pump use for 1 to 11 weeks 6 days postpartum, with all on closed-loop delivery from 12 to 24 weeks postpartum. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 study participants and their partners at 12 and 24 weeks postpartum. Thematic analyses were used to examine participants' and partners' experiences.

Results: Participants' positive perceptions of closed-loop use related to reduced hypoglycemia, in contrast to previous experiences with nonautomated insulin delivery. These perceptions were balanced against frustrations with the system, allowing blood glucose levels to be higher than desired. Closed-loop use did not influence infant feeding choice, but infant feeding and care impacted participants' diabetes management. Partners expressed uncertainty about the closed loop taking away control from participants who were highly skilled with diabetes self-management.

Conclusions: Participants reported that closed-loop insulin delivery resulted in less time spent in hypoglycemia when compared with the previously used nonautomated delivery. Yet, participants desired a greater understanding of the workings of the closed-loop algorithm. Our study provides potential users with realistic expectations about the experience with the MiniMed 670G or 770G closed-loop system in the postpartum period.

Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a temporary condition of pregnancy, identifies women at high risk of developing subsequent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Lifestyle interventions have been shown to reduce the risk of developing T2D after GDM. However, they often have low attendance and adherence rates. The Avoiding Diabetes After Pregnancy Trial in Moms (ADAPT-M) is a 24-week home-based postpartum program aimed at bridging the gap from prenatal care to T2D prevention for women with GDM. Our objective was to explore the experiences of participants who completed the ADAPT-M program, to elicit their perceived benefits and opportunities for improvement.

Methods: This was a qualitative descriptive study wherein we conducted semistructured interviews with 21 women with previous GDM who participated in the ADAPT-M program in Ontario, Canada. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo software using a conventional content analysis approach.

Results: Two themes describing the experience of women who underwent the ADAPT-M lifestyle-based coaching program emerged: 1) the benefits of a supportive relationship between coaches and participants; and 2) a desire for more from the program, including peer support, more customization, and addressing emotional needs.

Conclusions: Our findings support the importance of fostering supportive health-care relationships in T2D prevention programs for postpartum women with a history of GDM. Enhanced customization, emotional support, and opportunities for peer support should be considered in the development of future programming to better meet the needs of participants.

Objectives: The aim of this research was to understand the prevalence and impact of long COVID on adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Specifically, we sought to identify the proportion of adults with T2D who have had COVID-19 and experienced long COVID symptoms. We also explored how these ongoing symptoms impact diabetes management and physical activity participation.

Methods: Our study was carried out using an online survey of adults in Australia with T2D who had confirmed COVID-19 ≥12 weeks before participation. Respondents were asked to report the presence (and severity) of long COVID-19 symptoms, and, for those with long COVID, the impact of their symptoms on diabetes management (blood glucose, body weight) and physical activity participation (activities of daily living, work/study, exercise).

Results: Survey responses were provided by 1,046 adults with T2D (median age 61.0 [interquartile range 49.8 to 70.0] years; 56.0% men, 42.1% women, and 1% nonbinary/transgender; median T2D duration 10.0 [5.0 to 18.0] years and median time since COVID-19 infection 33.0 [20.3 to 36.1] weeks). Almost one third (30%) of respondents reported long COVID symptoms (present ≥12 weeks after most recent infection); 40% of respondents with long COVID symptoms reported a worsening of their diabetes management since their COVID-19 infection, with 29% reporting trouble controlling their blood glucose and 43% reporting a higher body weight. Two thirds of respondents with ongoing symptoms reported that these symptoms moderately to severely impacted their ability to perform activities of daily living, work, and/or exercise. The majority of those with long COVID reported reducing the frequency, duration, and/or intensity of exercise since their COVID-19 infection, with 36.1% not yet returning to their preinfection exercise levels; 66% cited ongoing symptoms as the primary reason for these limitations.

Conclusions: Physical activity is a crucial component of diabetes management. However, the high prevalence of long COVID is hindering participation in this population, as well as deleteriously impacting diabetes management. Developing strategies to support adults with T2D and long COVID to recommence safe levels of physical activity is of critical importance.

Objectives: In Canada, regional evaluations of screening practices for chronic kidney disease (CKD) among people with diabetes highlight areas for improvement; however, national estimates are notably absent. Estimates of CKD incidence often discount the expected decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) associated with age; age-adaptive thresholds may help account for this. We describe the frequency of screening and diagnosis of CKD among adults with diabetes from a nationally representative primary care cohort.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used electronic medical record data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. We followed adult patients (≥18 years of age) with diabetes without CKD at baseline for 5 years starting in 2014. We determined the frequency of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACr) and/or eGFR testing over time. We identified incident CKD diagnoses based on eGFR measurements using fixed-threshold and age-adaptive definitions and quantified the incidence proportion and rate.

Results: We analyzed records from 37,604 patients with diabetes. Only 13% of patients had yearly eGFR and uACr testing for CKD, although roughly 60% had non-yearly use of both tests in 5 years. eGFR testing was performed more frequently than uACr testing (94.1% vs 76.6% having testing over follow-up). We found increased incidence proportions (14.6% vs 6.0%) and rates (33.1 vs 13.4 diagnoses per 1,000 person years) of CKD using the fixed-threshold compared with age-adaptive definition.

Conclusions: Our study presents the first national understanding of screening practices for CKD among people with diabetes in Canada. Specifically, increased use of uACr testing should be encouraged for early detection of changes in kidney function.