Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique最新文献

Purpose: This retrospective study was conducted to ensure that irradiation of the pelvic lymph node areas associated with simultaneous hypofractionated boost to the prostate according to the protocol implemented at the university hospital of Tours (France) does not result in excess urinary and digestive toxicity in the short and medium term.

Materials and methods: The study population included patients with localized unfavourable intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. The dose delivered was 65Gy in 25 fractions of 2.6Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles, and 50Gy in 25 fractions of 2Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes. Acute toxicity events (between the start of radiotherapy and the first follow-up consultation) and medium-term toxicity events (after the first follow-up consultation) were assessed using the CTCAE version 5.0 classification.

Results: Sixty-three patients were treated according to the protocol between January 1st, 2020, and October 31st, 2022. The majority of them had high-risk prostate cancer (79%). The median follow-up was 15 months. Very few patients reported grade 3-4 toxicity acutely (6% urinary and 0% digestive toxicity) or in the medium term (7% urinary and 0% and digestive toxicity).

Conclusion: Radiotherapy of pelvic lymph node areas with simultaneous hypofractionated boost to the prostate is feasible, with low rates of severe acute and medium-term toxicity.

Purpose: With the promising results of immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after resection and complete lymph-node dissection must be reassessed. We evaluate the outcomes and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy and immunotherapy compared to immunotherapy only in patients with resected stage III melanoma.

Patients and methods: This retrospective and single institution study included patients treated for a stage III melanoma with complete lymph-node dissection and adjuvant immunotherapy from January 2019 to December 2022. The radiotherapy associated with immunotherapy group was defined by completion of immunotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy in the lymph-node dissection area. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints were locoregional progression, incidence of adverse events grade 3 or above and disease-free survival rate in patients with high risk of locoregional recurrence.

Results: Thirty-three patients were included. Among them, twelve received adjuvant lymph-node field radiotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 17months (range: 8-45months). Patients receiving radiotherapy and immunotherapy had a significantly higher disease stage and more frequent extracapsular extension. At 12months, the disease-free survival rate was 66.7% for the patients receiving immunotherapy alone (95% CI: 42.5-82.5%) and 83.3% for those receiving radiotherapy and immunotherapy (95% CI: 48.2-95.6%; P=0.131). The locoregional progression rate was 24% in patients receiving immunotherapy and 8% in patients receiving immunotherapy and radiotherapy (P=0.379). After adjuvant treatment, 6% of patients developed grade 3 or above immunotherapy-related events and none developed grade 3 or above radiation-related adverse events.

Conclusion: In patients with stage III melanoma, adjuvant lymph-node field radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy seems to be associated with longer disease-free survival, with acceptable tolerance. However, these results need to be confirmed by long-term and prospective studies.

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy has been used for prostate cancer. However, the bulk of published studies on stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer has involved the irradiation of the prostate alone, without irradiation of the pelvic lymph nodes. We report our preliminary experience with this approach.

Material and methods: The files of patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy in our institution were reviewed. Stereotactic body radiation was delivered with intensity modulated-volumetric arctherapy with daily image-guidance. The prostate planning target volume included the prostate plus a margin of 5mm in all directions. The pelvic planning target volume included pelvic nodes plus an expansion of 6 to 7mm in all directions. The prostate planning target volume received a total dose of 36.25Gy delivered in five fractions on alternate days. The nodal planning target volume received a dose of 25Gy in the same five fractions. Patients were followed during treatment, after 1, and 3 months and every 6 months thereafter. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was prospectively graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Results: Among the 188 patients, 80 received stereotactic body radiation to the prostate and the pelvic nodes, while 108 received stereotactic body radiation to the prostate target only. Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity was 4% in both groups, and grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity was 27% and 20% (P=0.9) for prostate only versus prostate and pelvis respectively. There was no grade 3 or higher acute gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity.

Conclusion: Stereotactic body radiation therapy in five fractions including the prostate and pelvic nodes, in patients with high-risk prostate cancer, has been feasible and safe in terms of acute toxicity.

In recent years, with the development of artificial intelligence, deep learning has been gradually applied to clinical treatment and research. It has also found its way into the applications in radiotherapy, a crucial method for cancer treatment. This study summarizes the commonly used and latest deep learning algorithms (including transformer, and diffusion models), introduces the workflow of different radiotherapy, and illustrates the application of different algorithms in different radiotherapy modules, as well as the defects and challenges of deep learning in the field of radiotherapy, so as to provide some help for the development of automatic radiotherapy for cancer.

Purpose: Radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia delivers a very high dose in a single fraction, over a few millimeters, at a single isocenter placed along the nerve. We present here the different steps that have been performed to validate small beams by conical collimators, and report the clinical results of the first patients treated on Novalis Tx®, frameless.

Material and methods: First, the geometric accuracy of 4 and 6mm conical collimators was evaluated using Winston-Lutz tests; then dosimetric data acquisition was performed using high spatial resolution detectors (PTW 60019 microdiamond and a PTW 60017 E-diode). The corrective factors of the TRS 483 report were applied to calculate the collimator aperture factors. These dosimetric data were then compared with the data implemented in the iPlan® treatment planning system. Then end-to-end tests were performed to control the entire treatment process using an anthropomorphic phantom "STEEV". Between 2020 and 2022, 18 patients were treated for refractory trigeminal neuralgia on Novalis Tx®, frameless, with Exactrac® repositioning. A total of 17 patients were evaluated (one was lost to follow-up) using the BNI score for pain assessment and MRI with a median follow-up of 12 months.

Results: The quality criteria of geometric and dosimetric accuracy were met for the 6-mm cone but not for the 4-mm cone. All patients were treated with a 6-mm cone with a dose of 90Gy prescribed at the isocenter at the root entry zone. Initial pain control was obtained in 70.5% of our patients, and 53% maintained pain control with a median follow-up of 12 months. All recurrences occurred within 3 to 6 months after radiosurgery. No brainstem toxicity was observed. Six patients had non-disabling facial hypoesthesia, half of whom already had pretreatment hypoesthesia.

Conclusion: The treatment of trigeminal neuralgia on a dedicated linear accelerator is a highly technical treatment whose accuracy and safety are paramount. The physical measurements allowed the commissioning of the technique with a 6mm cone. Our first clinical results are in accordance with the literature.

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a malignant tumor with a poor prognosis and a frequent metastatic extension. In very rare cases, a cardiac metastatic disease may occur, and surgical resection is essential for its management. MR-guided stereotactic radiotherapy is an attractive radiotherapy modality for the treatment of mobile thoracic tumors, enabling the target to be monitored continuously during irradiation, while the dosimetric plan can be adapted daily if necessary. We report here the case of a patient with intracardiac metastasis secondary to malignant adrenocortical carcinoma, treated with magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic radiotherapy.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the shifting patterns of the mediastinum, including the target volume and the isocenter point during the postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) process of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to observe the occurrence of radiation injury. Additionally, we investigated the significance of mid-term assessment during the implementation of the PORT process.

Material and methods: We established coordinate axes based on bone anatomy and measured the mediastinum's three-dimensional direction and the shift of the isocenter point's shift in the PORT process. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, and the Chi-square test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: In this study, the analysis of patients revealed that the shift of anterior and posterior mediastinum (X), left and right mediastinum (Y), upper and lower mediastinum (Z), anterior and posterior isocenter point (X_i), and the left and right isocenter points (Y_i) in the PORT process were 0.04-0.53, 0.00-0.84, 0.00-1.27, 0.01-0.86, and 0.00-0.66cm, respectively. The shift distance of the mediastinum was Z>Y>X, and the shift distance of the isocenter point was X_i>Y_i. According to the ROC curve, the cut-off values were 0.263, 0.352, 0.405, 0.238, and 0.258, respectively, which were more significant than the cut-off values in 25 cases (25%), 30 cases (30%), 30 cases (30%), 17 cases (17%), and 15 cases (15%). In addition, there was a significant difference in the shift of the mediastinum and the isocenter point (all P=0.00). Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant difference between mediastinal shift and resection site in X, Y, and Z directions (P=0.355, P=0.239, P=0.256), surgical method (P=0.241, P=0.110, P=0.064). There was no significant difference in the incidence of RE and RP in PORT patients (P>0.05). No III-IV RP occurred. However, the incidence of ≥ grade III RE in the modified plan cases after M-S was significantly lower than in the original PORT patients, 0% and 7%, respectively (P=0.000).

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study provides evidence that mediastinal shift is a potential complication during the PORT process for patients with N2 stage or R1-2 resection following radical resection of NSCLC. This shift affects about 20-30% of patients, manifesting as actual radiation damage to normal tissue and reducing the local control rate. Therefore, mid-term repositioning of the PORT and revision of the target volume and radiation therapy plan can aid in maintaining QA and QC during the treatment of NSCLC patients and may result in improved patient outcomes.