CJEM最新文献

Introduction: Emergency medicine can involve irregular working hours and shiftwork with unpredictable down time, making adequate nutrition and hydration difficult to obtain. The objectives of this study were to examine: (a) the extent to which Canadian Emergency Medicine physicians eat and/or drink during shifts; (b) factors influencing these habits; and (c) the impact on them when they do not eat/drink. A secondary objective was to examine the impact of the number of practice years on the frequency of eating on-shift.

Methods: A mixed-methods study of 16 closed- and 2 open-ended survey questions was created using REDCap. Canadian staff physicians and residents who identified as "Emergency Medicine Physicians" were targeted via email and social media. Analyses involved descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression, and inductive and summative content analyses.

Results: Among 527 respondents, nearly 35% reported "never" or "hardly ever" eating during shifts and 36.6% reported "never" or "hardly ever" drinking water during shifts. Major barriers included lack of time (91.4%) and easily available food for purchase (35.9%). Open-ended responses reflected health reasons, mental clarity, and hospital culture as influencing factors. Years of practice were a significant predictor of eating "frequently" or "almost always" on shift [1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.06)].

Conclusion: Over one-third of Canadian Emergency Medicine physicians in this study rarely or never eat or drink on shift. These nutrition and hydration habits of Emergency Medicine physicians require further study given their importance for physicians' physical and mental health, as well as patient care. The results of this study can influence conversations surrounding Emergency Medicine physicians' eating habits and ED culture, which could lead to improvements in overall wellness.

Background: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hip fractures are typically treated with opioids, which are associated with adverse events such as delirium and respiratory depression. The fascia iliaca compartment block (hereafter fascia iliaca block) is a regional analgesia technique which avoids these negative outcomes. We sought to increase the rate of use of this technique to 50% of all patients with hip fractures who presented to our EDs within an 18-month period.

Methods: We held three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles designed in accordance with surveys sent to our physician group. The first cycle consisted of the dissemination of educational materials and standardization of equipment carts. Next, we held educational sessions for staff and trainee physicians. The third cycle consisted of additional education, Audit and Feedback methodology and incentives. Our outcome measure was the rate of fascia iliaca blocks performed. We tracked the number of unique physicians performing the fascia iliaca block as well as physician-reported comfort with the procedure for our process measures. Our balancing measure was the rate of adverse events.

Results: We went from a baseline rate of 2.0% to 22.6% of patients receiving fascia iliaca blocks. The number of physicians doing this increased from 6 pre-project to 35. Only one adverse event occurred (arterial puncture), which did not cause any significant patient harm. Our statistical process control chart revealed special cause variation in the form of a shift.

Conclusion: Although we did not meet our goal, we were able to significantly improve the rate of fascia iliaca blocks performed at our center. This was largely achieved through educational interventions. Our approach can be adapted by other centers looking to pursue a similar project.

Purpose: Higher mortality has been reported in older patients with moderate traumatic brain Injuries (TBI) compared to younger patients. To identify the risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality, complications and extended length of stay in moderate TBI patients.

Methods: DESIGN: a multicentre observational cohort study using the Quebec Trauma Registry.

Population: Hospitalized patients aged ≥ 16 with a moderate TBI (a head injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3, and a GCS score of 9-12).

Outcomes: In-hospital mortality, complications and prolonged length of stay.

Analyses: Multivariable logistic regression.

Results: We included 1005 patients, 38.1% of whom were aged ≥ 65. The in-hospital mortality rate was 20.1%. Male sex (OR = 1.6 [95% CI:1.02-2.6], age (≥ 85 years old VS < 65 years) (OR = 18.7 [95% CI: 9.2-38.1]), ≥ 2 comorbidities (OR = 2.3 [95% CI: 1.3-4.0]), Injury Severity Score (OR = 1.04 [95% CI: 1.01-1.1]), presence of intraparenchymal hematoma (OR = 3.5 [95% CI: 2.2-5.5]) or other CT scan findings (cerebral edema, pneumocephalus, subpial hemorrhage, and pituitary injury) (OR = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.2-3.1]) were associated with increased odds of mortality. Male sex (OR = 1.8 [95% CI: 1.2-2.6]), age (65-74: OR = 1.7 [95% CI: 1.1-2.8] & 75-84: OR = 1.6 [95% CI: 1.03-2.6]), ≥ 2 comorbidities (OR = 2.9 [95% CI: 1.8-4.7]), thoraco-abdominal concomitant injury (OR = 2.0 [95% CI: 1.01-3.8]), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR = 7.6 [95% CI:1.5-38.5]) were associated with increased odds of complications. The number of comorbidities (≥ 2 OR = 1.7 [95% CI: 1.1-2.7]), spine injury (OR = 2.4 [95% CI: 1.4-4.1]), and delirium (OR = 3.1 [95% CI:1.8-5.2]) were associated with an increased odd of extended length of stay.

Conclusions: This study identified risk factors of in-hospital mortality, complications and extended length of stay, most of which are quickly available in the Emergency Department (ED). These factors could help clinicians identify moderate TBI patients at high risk of in-hospital mortality and guide shared decision-making regarding goals of care.

Background: Measuring physician workload in the pediatric emergency department (ED) could help optimize staffing, improve department efficiency, and provide a metric to assess interventions aimed at improving pediatric ED flow. However, no accepted measure of physician workload exists. Billing codes, which reflect the perceived complexity of treating a patient, may serve as a surrogate for physician workload. Our objective was to evaluate whether billing codes are a valid surrogate for pediatric ED physician workload.

Methods: We conducted a health records review to determine if billing codes were associated with measures of pediatric ED physician work. Visit information was extracted for 150 pediatric ED visits. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression models to assess the association between pediatric ED physician-assigned billing codes, with measures of visit complexity, and measures of pediatric ED physician work. We also completed a sensitivity analysis considering a billing auditors-assigned billing codes.

Results: Three measures of pediatric ED physician work were independently associated with increased physician-assigned billing codes: receiving labs (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.2-15.4), ordering medications (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-5.1), and having specialist consultation (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.6-12.5). We did not find any statistically significant associations between physician-assigned billing codes and measures of physician work after adjusting for visit complexity, age, and sex. Visit acuity (PaedsCTAS 1-3) was associated with increased billing codes (aOR 5.1 95% CI 1.9-15.7). These results were largely consistent with our sensitivity analysis considering billing auditor-assigned codes.

Conclusions: Overall, we found limited evidence supporting the content validity of billing code as a surrogate of pediatric ED physician workload. These results, coupled with the potential value of tracking physician workload, highlight the necessity to develop a valid and reliable measure specifically considering pediatric ED physician workload.