首页 > 最新文献

Diabetes care最新文献

英文 中文
Pathophysiology and Treatment of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Youth. 青少年糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病的病理生理学和治疗。
Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.2337/dci24-0029
Fida Bacha, Tamara S Hannon, Mustafa Tosur, Julie M Pike, Ashley Butler, Kalie L Tommerdahl, Philip S Zeitler

Youth-onset type 2 diabetes is a heterogeneous disease with increasing prevalence in relation to increased rates of obesity in children. It has genetic, epigenetic, social, and environmental determinants. Youth-onset type 2 diabetes is alarming given a rapidly progressive course compared with the course of adult-onset disease, early-onset vascular complications, and long-term exposure to hyperglycemia and associated complications. It is often preceded by prediabetes, a disease phase where defects in β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity emerge. Herein, we review the current understanding of the pathophysiology of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in youth. We describe the mechanisms underlying insulin resistance, the precipitous decline of β-cell function, and the role of other hormonal abnormalities in the pathogenesis of the disease. We discuss the critical importance of social determinants of health in the predisposition and progression of these conditions and present current management strategies and the advances in therapeutic approaches. These must adapt to meet the unique needs of the individual patient and family. Significant knowledge gaps remain that need to be addressed in future research.

青少年发病的 2 型糖尿病是一种异质性疾病,发病率随着儿童肥胖率的增加而上升。它有遗传、表观遗传、社会和环境决定因素。与成人发病的过程相比,青少年发病的 2 型糖尿病进展迅速,早期出现血管并发症,并长期暴露于高血糖和相关并发症,因此令人担忧。在此之前,通常会出现 "糖尿病前期",即β细胞功能相对于胰岛素敏感性出现缺陷的疾病阶段。在此,我们回顾了目前对青年糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病病理生理学的理解。我们描述了胰岛素抵抗、β 细胞功能急剧下降的内在机制,以及其他激素异常在疾病发病机制中的作用。我们讨论了健康的社会决定因素在这些疾病的易感性和发展过程中的至关重要性,并介绍了当前的管理策略和治疗方法的进展。这些策略必须适应患者和家庭的独特需求。在知识方面仍存在巨大差距,需要在未来的研究中加以解决。
{"title":"Pathophysiology and Treatment of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Youth.","authors":"Fida Bacha, Tamara S Hannon, Mustafa Tosur, Julie M Pike, Ashley Butler, Kalie L Tommerdahl, Philip S Zeitler","doi":"10.2337/dci24-0029","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dci24-0029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Youth-onset type 2 diabetes is a heterogeneous disease with increasing prevalence in relation to increased rates of obesity in children. It has genetic, epigenetic, social, and environmental determinants. Youth-onset type 2 diabetes is alarming given a rapidly progressive course compared with the course of adult-onset disease, early-onset vascular complications, and long-term exposure to hyperglycemia and associated complications. It is often preceded by prediabetes, a disease phase where defects in β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity emerge. Herein, we review the current understanding of the pathophysiology of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in youth. We describe the mechanisms underlying insulin resistance, the precipitous decline of β-cell function, and the role of other hormonal abnormalities in the pathogenesis of the disease. We discuss the critical importance of social determinants of health in the predisposition and progression of these conditions and present current management strategies and the advances in therapeutic approaches. These must adapt to meet the unique needs of the individual patient and family. Significant knowledge gaps remain that need to be addressed in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"2038-2049"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142157031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of a Tubeless AID System Compared With Pump Therapy With CGM in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Adults With Suboptimal Glycemia: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial. 无管 AID 系统与带 CGM 的泵疗法相比,在治疗血糖不达标的成人 1 型糖尿病中的疗效和安全性:随机、平行组临床试验。
Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-1550
Eric Renard, Ruth S Weinstock, Grazia Aleppo, Bruce W Bode, Sue A Brown, Kristin Castorino, Irl B Hirsch, Mark S Kipnes, Lori M Laffel, Rayhan A Lal, Alfred Penfornis, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Viral N Shah, Charles Thivolet, Trang T Ly

Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of the tubeless Omnipod 5 automated insulin delivery (AID) system compared with pump therapy with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes with suboptimal glycemic outcomes.

Research design and methods: In this 13-week multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial performed in the U.S. and France, adults aged 18-70 years with type 1 diabetes and HbA1c 7-11% (53-97 mmol/mol) were randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention (tubeless AID) or control (pump therapy with CGM) following a 2-week standard therapy period. The primary outcome was a treatment group comparison of time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) during the trial period.

Results: A total of 194 participants were randomized, with 132 assigned to the intervention and 62 to the control. TIR during the trial was 4.2h/day higher in the intervention compared with the control group (mean difference 17.5% [95% CI 14.0%, 21.1%]; P < 0.0001). The intervention group had a greater reduction in HbA1c from baseline compared with the control group (mean ± SD -1.24 ± 0.75% [-13.6 ± 8.2 mmol/mol] vs. -0.68 ± 0.93% [-7.4 ± 10.2 mmol/mol], respectively; P < 0.0001), accompanied by a significantly lower time <70 mg/dL (1.18 ± 0.86% vs. 1.75 ± 1.68%; P = 0.005) and >180 mg/dL (37.6 ± 11.4% vs. 54.5 ± 15.4%; P < 0.0001). All primary and secondary outcomes were met. No instances of diabetes-related ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia occurred in the intervention group.

Conclusions: Use of the tubeless AID system led to improved glycemic outcomes compared with pump therapy with CGM among adults with type 1 diabetes, underscoring the clinical benefit of AID and bolstering recommendations to establish AID systems as preferred therapy for this population.

目的研究设计和方法:在美国和法国进行的这项为期 13 周的多中心平行分组随机对照试验中,年龄在 18-70 岁之间、患有 1 型糖尿病且 HbA1c 为 7-11% 的成人参加了试验:在美国和法国进行的这项为期 13 周的多中心、平行组、随机对照试验中,年龄在 18-70 岁之间、HbA1c 为 7-11% (53-97 mmol/mol)的 1 型糖尿病成人被随机分配(2:1)到干预组(无管 AID)或对照组(带 CGM 的泵疗法),然后接受为期 2 周的标准治疗。主要结果是治疗组在试验期间的血糖控制在范围内(TIR)(70-180 mg/dL)的时间比较:共有 194 人参加了随机试验,其中 132 人被分配到干预组,62 人被分配到对照组。与对照组相比,干预组在试验期间的 TIR 高出 4.2 小时/天(平均差异为 17.5% [95% CI 14.0%, 21.1%];P < 0.0001)。与对照组相比,干预组的 HbA1c 从基线降低幅度更大(分别为平均值 ± SD -1.24 ± 0.75% [-13.6 ± 8.2 mmol/mol] 与 -0.68 ± 0.93% [-7.4 ± 10.2 mmol/mol];P < 0.0001),同时 180 mg/dL 的时间显著降低(37.6 ± 11.4% 与 54.5 ± 15.4%;P < 0.0001)。所有主要和次要结果均符合要求。干预组未发生与糖尿病相关的酮症酸中毒或严重低血糖:结论:与使用 CGM 的泵疗法相比,使用无管 AID 系统可改善 1 型糖尿病成人患者的血糖结果,强调了 AID 的临床益处,并加强了将 AID 系统作为该人群首选疗法的建议。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of a Tubeless AID System Compared With Pump Therapy With CGM in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Adults With Suboptimal Glycemia: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.","authors":"Eric Renard, Ruth S Weinstock, Grazia Aleppo, Bruce W Bode, Sue A Brown, Kristin Castorino, Irl B Hirsch, Mark S Kipnes, Lori M Laffel, Rayhan A Lal, Alfred Penfornis, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Viral N Shah, Charles Thivolet, Trang T Ly","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1550","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dc24-1550","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the efficacy and safety of the tubeless Omnipod 5 automated insulin delivery (AID) system compared with pump therapy with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes with suboptimal glycemic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this 13-week multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial performed in the U.S. and France, adults aged 18-70 years with type 1 diabetes and HbA1c 7-11% (53-97 mmol/mol) were randomly assigned (2:1) to intervention (tubeless AID) or control (pump therapy with CGM) following a 2-week standard therapy period. The primary outcome was a treatment group comparison of time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL) during the trial period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 194 participants were randomized, with 132 assigned to the intervention and 62 to the control. TIR during the trial was 4.2h/day higher in the intervention compared with the control group (mean difference 17.5% [95% CI 14.0%, 21.1%]; P < 0.0001). The intervention group had a greater reduction in HbA1c from baseline compared with the control group (mean ± SD -1.24 ± 0.75% [-13.6 ± 8.2 mmol/mol] vs. -0.68 ± 0.93% [-7.4 ± 10.2 mmol/mol], respectively; P < 0.0001), accompanied by a significantly lower time <70 mg/dL (1.18 ± 0.86% vs. 1.75 ± 1.68%; P = 0.005) and >180 mg/dL (37.6 ± 11.4% vs. 54.5 ± 15.4%; P < 0.0001). All primary and secondary outcomes were met. No instances of diabetes-related ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia occurred in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the tubeless AID system led to improved glycemic outcomes compared with pump therapy with CGM among adults with type 1 diabetes, underscoring the clinical benefit of AID and bolstering recommendations to establish AID systems as preferred therapy for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"2248-2257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142483932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Medicines for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity. 治疗 2 型糖尿病和肥胖症的 GLP-1 药物的疗效和安全性。
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.2337/dci24-0003
Daniel J Drucker

The development of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) for type 2 diabetes and obesity was followed by data establishing the cardiorenal benefits of GLP-1RA in select patient populations. In ongoing trials investigators are interrogating the efficacy of these agents for new indications, including metabolic liver disease, peripheral artery disease, Parkinson disease, and Alzheimer disease. The success of GLP-1-based medicines has spurred the development of new molecular entities and combinations with unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, exemplified by tirzepatide, a GIP-GLP-1 receptor coagonist. Simultaneously, investigational molecules such as maritide block the GIP and activate the GLP-1 receptor, whereas retatrutide and survodutide enable simultaneous activation of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors. Here I highlight evidence establishing the efficacy of GLP-1-based medicines, while discussing data that inform safety, focusing on muscle strength, bone density and fractures, exercise capacity, gastrointestinal motility, retained gastric contents and anesthesia, pancreatic and biliary tract disorders, and the risk of cancer. Rapid progress in development of highly efficacious GLP-1 medicines, and anticipated differentiation of newer agents in subsets of metabolic disorders, will provide greater opportunities for use of personalized medicine approaches to improve the health of people living with cardiometabolic disorders.

在开发出治疗 2 型糖尿病和肥胖症的胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)后,又有数据证实 GLP-1RA 对特定患者群体的心肾功能有益。在正在进行的试验中,研究人员正在研究这些药物对新适应症的疗效,包括代谢性肝病、外周动脉疾病、帕金森病和阿尔茨海默病。GLP-1 类药物的成功刺激了具有独特药代动力学和药效学特征的新分子实体和组合的开发,GIP-GLP-1 受体拮抗剂 tirzepatide 就是一个例子。同时,马里肽等在研分子可阻断 GIP 并激活 GLP-1 受体,而瑞他鲁肽和 survodutide 可同时激活胰高血糖素和 GLP-1 受体。在此,我将重点介绍证明 GLP-1 类药物疗效的证据,同时讨论有关安全性的数据,重点关注肌肉力量、骨密度和骨折、运动能力、胃肠道蠕动、残留胃内容物和麻醉、胰腺和胆道疾病以及癌症风险。高效 GLP-1 药物的研发取得了快速进展,预计更新的药物将在代谢紊乱的子集中出现分化,这将为使用个性化医疗方法改善心血管代谢紊乱患者的健康提供更多机会。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Medicines for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity.","authors":"Daniel J Drucker","doi":"10.2337/dci24-0003","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dci24-0003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) for type 2 diabetes and obesity was followed by data establishing the cardiorenal benefits of GLP-1RA in select patient populations. In ongoing trials investigators are interrogating the efficacy of these agents for new indications, including metabolic liver disease, peripheral artery disease, Parkinson disease, and Alzheimer disease. The success of GLP-1-based medicines has spurred the development of new molecular entities and combinations with unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, exemplified by tirzepatide, a GIP-GLP-1 receptor coagonist. Simultaneously, investigational molecules such as maritide block the GIP and activate the GLP-1 receptor, whereas retatrutide and survodutide enable simultaneous activation of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors. Here I highlight evidence establishing the efficacy of GLP-1-based medicines, while discussing data that inform safety, focusing on muscle strength, bone density and fractures, exercise capacity, gastrointestinal motility, retained gastric contents and anesthesia, pancreatic and biliary tract disorders, and the risk of cancer. Rapid progress in development of highly efficacious GLP-1 medicines, and anticipated differentiation of newer agents in subsets of metabolic disorders, will provide greater opportunities for use of personalized medicine approaches to improve the health of people living with cardiometabolic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1873-1888"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141285680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utilizing Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Early Detection of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy Outcomes in an Asian Population. 在亚裔人群中利用连续血糖监测仪早期检测妊娠糖尿病和妊娠结果。
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-0944
Beth S Y Lim, Qian Yang, Mahesh Choolani, Daphne S L Gardner, Yap Seng Chong, Cuilin Zhang, Shiao-Yng Chan, Ling-Jun Li

Objective: We explored the potential value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in early pregnancy in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregnancy outcomes.

Research design and methods: The study recruited 103 multiethnic Asian pregnant women with overweight or obesity from a hospital-based, prospective cohort. All of them had worn blinded CGM devices in early pregnancy and underwent the universal GDM screening at 24-28 gestation weeks. Models were selected based on early pregnancy risk factors and CGM-derived parameters to compare their respective predictive values for GDM and pregnancy outcomes.

Results: Eighteen GDM cases were ascertained. CGM-derived novel parameters demonstrated greater performance (e.g., area under the curve: 0.953 vs. 0.722) for predicting incident GDM compared with the model using traditional risks. Such novel CGM-derived parameters significantly differentiated primary cesarean and large-for-gestational age babies.

Conclusions: Our data suggest CGM's potential clinical utility in the first trimester for predicting GDM and adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly in individuals with overweight or obesity.

研究目的我们探讨了孕早期连续血糖监测(CGM)在预测妊娠糖尿病(GDM)和妊娠结局方面的潜在价值:研究从医院的前瞻性队列中招募了 103 名超重/肥胖的多种族亚洲孕妇。她们均在孕早期佩戴过盲法 CGM 设备,并在孕 24-28 周时接受了 GDM 普遍筛查。根据孕早期风险因素和 CGM 衍生参数选择模型,比较它们各自对 GDM 和妊娠结局的预测价值:结果:确定了 18 例 GDM。与使用传统风险的模型相比,CGM 衍生的新参数在预测 GDM 事件方面表现出更高的性能(例如,曲线下面积:0.953 vs. 0.722)。这些新的 CGM 衍生参数能明显区分初次剖宫产婴儿和大妊高症婴儿:我们的数据表明,CGM 在妊娠头三个月预测 GDM 和不良妊娠结局方面具有潜在的临床实用性,尤其是在超重或肥胖人群中。
{"title":"Utilizing Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Early Detection of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pregnancy Outcomes in an Asian Population.","authors":"Beth S Y Lim, Qian Yang, Mahesh Choolani, Daphne S L Gardner, Yap Seng Chong, Cuilin Zhang, Shiao-Yng Chan, Ling-Jun Li","doi":"10.2337/dc24-0944","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dc24-0944","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored the potential value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in early pregnancy in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study recruited 103 multiethnic Asian pregnant women with overweight or obesity from a hospital-based, prospective cohort. All of them had worn blinded CGM devices in early pregnancy and underwent the universal GDM screening at 24-28 gestation weeks. Models were selected based on early pregnancy risk factors and CGM-derived parameters to compare their respective predictive values for GDM and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen GDM cases were ascertained. CGM-derived novel parameters demonstrated greater performance (e.g., area under the curve: 0.953 vs. 0.722) for predicting incident GDM compared with the model using traditional risks. Such novel CGM-derived parameters significantly differentiated primary cesarean and large-for-gestational age babies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest CGM's potential clinical utility in the first trimester for predicting GDM and adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly in individuals with overweight or obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1916-1921"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration. 为糖尿病足溃疡干预措施评估研究制定核心结果集。
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-1112
Aleksandra Staniszewska, Frances Game, Jane Nixon, David Russell, David G Armstrong, Christopher Ashmore, Sicco A Bus, Jayer Chung, Vivienne Chuter, Ketan Dhatariya, George Dovell, Michael Edmonds, Robert Fitridge, Catherine Gooday, Emma J Hamilton, Amy Jones, Venu Kavarthapu, Lawrence A Lavery, Joseph L Mills, Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Maia Osborne-Grinter, Edgar J G Peters, Joseph Shalhoub, Jaap van Netten, Dane K Wukich, Robert J Hinchliffe

Objective: Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration.

Research design and methods: The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified.

Results: The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality.

Conclusions: The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.

目的:全球有 5.37 亿人患有糖尿病,其中 34% 的人在一生中会出现足部溃疡。与糖尿病相关的足部溃疡给全球医疗系统造成了巨大压力,因此有必要提供高质量的证据来指导患者的治疗。鉴于报告结果的异质性,我们开发了一套核心结果集(COS),以规范糖尿病相关足部溃疡治疗方法评估研究的结果测量:研究设计与方法:COS 是采用疗效试验中的核心结果测量(COMET)方法制定的。在第一轮德尔菲调查中,患者和专家使用九点李克特量表(从1[不重要]到9[关键])对这些结果进行评分。根据预先确定的标准,未达成共识的结果将在第二轮德尔菲调查中重新排序。两轮德尔菲调查后,关键结果和未达成共识的结果在共识会议上进行讨论,并在会上批准了 COS:结果:系统回顾和患者访谈产生了 103 项候选结果。分别有 336 名和 176 名受访者完成了连续两轮德尔菲调查,第二轮总回复率为 52%。在共识会议讨论的 37 项结果中(22 项关键结果和 15 项第二轮后未达成共识的结果),有 8 项形成了 COS:伤口愈合、愈合时间、新发/复发溃疡、感染、大截肢、小截肢、与健康相关的生活质量和死亡率:针对糖尿病足溃疡治疗方法评估研究提出的 COS 是采用 COMET 方法制定的。研究界采用该方法将有助于评估当前和不断发展的干预措施的比较效果。
{"title":"Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.","authors":"Aleksandra Staniszewska, Frances Game, Jane Nixon, David Russell, David G Armstrong, Christopher Ashmore, Sicco A Bus, Jayer Chung, Vivienne Chuter, Ketan Dhatariya, George Dovell, Michael Edmonds, Robert Fitridge, Catherine Gooday, Emma J Hamilton, Amy Jones, Venu Kavarthapu, Lawrence A Lavery, Joseph L Mills, Matilde Monteiro-Soares, Maia Osborne-Grinter, Edgar J G Peters, Joseph Shalhoub, Jaap van Netten, Dane K Wukich, Robert J Hinchliffe","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1112","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dc24-1112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes affects 537 million people globally, with 34% expected to develop foot ulceration in their lifetime. Diabetes-related foot ulceration causes strain on health care systems worldwide, necessitating provision of high-quality evidence to guide their management. Given heterogeneity of reported outcomes, a core outcome set (COS) was developed to standardize outcome measures in studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The COS was developed using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) methodology. A systematic review and patient interviews generated a long list of outcomes that were rated by patients and experts using a nine-point Likert scale (from 1 [not important] to 9 [critical]) in the first round of the Delphi survey. Based on predefined criteria, outcomes without consensus were reprioritized in a second Delphi round. Critical outcomes and those without consensus after two Delphi rounds were discussed in the consensus meeting where the COS was ratified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review and patient interviews generated 103 candidate outcomes. The two consecutive Delphi rounds were completed by 336 and 176 respondents, resulting in an overall second round response rate of 52%. Of 37 outcomes discussed in the consensus meeting (22 critical and 15 without consensus after the second round), 8 formed the COS: wound healing, time to healing, new/recurrent ulceration, infection, major amputation, minor amputation, health-related quality of life, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed COS for studies assessing treatments for diabetes-related foot ulceration was developed using COMET methodology. Its adoption by the research community will facilitate assessment of comparative effectiveness of current and evolving interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1958-1968"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142143500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated With Empagliflozin in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. 与 2 型糖尿病老年患者使用 Empagliflozin 相关的医疗保健使用率和成本。
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-0270
Phyo Than Htoo, Mehdi NajafZadeh, Helen Tesfaye, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Deborah J Wexler, Robert J Glynn, Niklas Schmedt, Anouk Déruaz-Luyet, Lisette Koeneman, Julie M Paik, Elisabetta Patorno

Objective: We compared health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for inpatient and outpatient services and dispensed medications in older adults with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is).

Research design and methods: The study population included U.S. Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes (age ≥65 years) initiating empagliflozin or DPP-4is (August 2014 to September 2018). We estimated rate ratios (RRs) for HCRU outcomes using zero-inflated negative binomial regression and per-member per-year (PMPY) cost differences using generalized linear model with gamma distributions, overall and stratified by baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD), after adjusting for 143 baseline covariates using 1:1 propensity score matching.

Results: We identified 23,335 matched pairs (mean age 72 years, 51% with baseline CVD). HCRU rates were lower in empagliflozin versus DPP-4i initiators (number of inpatient days, RR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82, 0.97]; number of emergency department [ED] visits, 0.86 [0.82, 0.91]; number of hospitalizations, 0.86 [0.79, 0.93]; number of office visits, 0.96 [0.95, 0.98]). Inpatient cost (-$713 PMPY [95% CI -847, -579), outpatient cost (-$198 PMPY [-272, -124]), and total cost of care (-$1,109 PMPY [-1,478, -739]) were lower for empagliflozin versus DPP-4is, although diabetes medication cost was higher in empagliflozin initiators ($454 PMPY [95% CI 284, 567]). In the CVD subgroup, total cost was lower for empagliflozin initiators (-$2,005 PMPY [-2,451, -1,337]), while the difference was attenuated in the non-CVD subgroup (-$296 PMPY [-740, 148]).

Conclusions: Among older adults with diabetes, empagliflozin was associated with a lower number of inpatient days, hospitalizations, ED visits, and office visits and with lower costs of care compared with DPP-4is, especially in those with history of CVD.

目的:我们比较了开始使用empagliflozin和二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4is)的2型糖尿病老年人的医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和住院、门诊服务及配药成本:研究人群包括美国医疗保险付费服务受益人中的糖尿病患者(年龄≥65岁),他们开始服用empagliflozin或DPP-4is(2014年8月至2018年9月)。我们使用零膨胀负二项回归估算了HCRU结果的比率比(RRs),并使用伽马分布的广义线性模型估算了总体和按基线心血管疾病(CVD)分层的每成员每年(PMPY)成本差异,然后使用1:1倾向得分匹配调整了143个基线协变量:我们确定了 23335 对匹配对象(平均年龄 72 岁,51% 患有基线心血管疾病)。与 DPP-4i 启动者相比,empagliflozin 启动者的 HCRU 发生率较低(住院天数,RR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82, 0.97];急诊科就诊次数,0.86 [0.82, 0.91];住院次数,0.86 [0.79, 0.93];门诊次数,0.96 [0.95, 0.98])。与DPP-4is相比,empagliflozin的住院费用(-713美元/年[95% CI -847,-579])、门诊费用(-198美元/年[-272,-124])和总护理费用(-1109美元/年[-1478,-739])均较低,但empagliflozin启动者的糖尿病药物费用较高(454美元/年[95% CI 284,567])。在心血管疾病亚组中,开始服用恩格列净者的总费用较低(-2,005 美元/年[-2,451, -1,337] ),而在非心血管疾病亚组中,这一差异有所减弱(-296 美元/年[-740, 148]):在患有糖尿病的老年人中,与 DPP-4is 相比,empagliflozin 可降低住院天数、住院次数、急诊室就诊次数和门诊次数,并降低医疗费用,尤其是在有心血管疾病史的老年人中。
{"title":"Health Care Utilization and Costs Associated With Empagliflozin in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Phyo Than Htoo, Mehdi NajafZadeh, Helen Tesfaye, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Deborah J Wexler, Robert J Glynn, Niklas Schmedt, Anouk Déruaz-Luyet, Lisette Koeneman, Julie M Paik, Elisabetta Patorno","doi":"10.2337/dc24-0270","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dc24-0270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We compared health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for inpatient and outpatient services and dispensed medications in older adults with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study population included U.S. Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes (age ≥65 years) initiating empagliflozin or DPP-4is (August 2014 to September 2018). We estimated rate ratios (RRs) for HCRU outcomes using zero-inflated negative binomial regression and per-member per-year (PMPY) cost differences using generalized linear model with gamma distributions, overall and stratified by baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD), after adjusting for 143 baseline covariates using 1:1 propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 23,335 matched pairs (mean age 72 years, 51% with baseline CVD). HCRU rates were lower in empagliflozin versus DPP-4i initiators (number of inpatient days, RR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82, 0.97]; number of emergency department [ED] visits, 0.86 [0.82, 0.91]; number of hospitalizations, 0.86 [0.79, 0.93]; number of office visits, 0.96 [0.95, 0.98]). Inpatient cost (-$713 PMPY [95% CI -847, -579), outpatient cost (-$198 PMPY [-272, -124]), and total cost of care (-$1,109 PMPY [-1,478, -739]) were lower for empagliflozin versus DPP-4is, although diabetes medication cost was higher in empagliflozin initiators ($454 PMPY [95% CI 284, 567]). In the CVD subgroup, total cost was lower for empagliflozin initiators (-$2,005 PMPY [-2,451, -1,337]), while the difference was attenuated in the non-CVD subgroup (-$296 PMPY [-740, 148]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among older adults with diabetes, empagliflozin was associated with a lower number of inpatient days, hospitalizations, ED visits, and office visits and with lower costs of care compared with DPP-4is, especially in those with history of CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1900-1907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502532/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141452530","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Regional Heterogeneity of the Results of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Trials in Type 2 Diabetes: A Reanalysis of Individual Participant Data. 2 型糖尿病患者胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂试验结果的地区异质性:对个体参与者数据的再分析。
Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.2337/dca24-0034
Ariane Jullien, Clément Jambon-Barbara, Jean-Luc Cracowski, Brian L Claggett, Anne-Laure Borel, Charles Khouri, Matthieu Roustit

Objective: Multiregional trials are designed under the assumption that treatment effect applies to the entire target population, yet several factors may introduce geographic heterogeneity in treatment effect. We explored whether such variations exist in trials assessing the efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in major cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes.

Research design and methods: A systematic search of Medline and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception until 30 June 2020. We included international randomized controlled trials comparing any GLP-1RA versus placebo, with MACE as a primary end point. Individual participant data were subsequently requested from the sponsor or through data sharing platforms. For each trial, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs for MACE, subgrouped by region. We then performed a random-effects meta-analysis and conducted meta-regressions to assess the influence of predetermined variables of interest on treatment effect.

Results: We included six trials including 45,426 patients. Baseline risk of MACE ranged from 2.9 per 100 patient-years in Southern Asia to 7.4 per 100 patient-years in Sub-Saharan Africa. HRs for MACE ranged between 0.25 (95% CI 0.05, 1.12) in Northern Africa to 0.98 (0.79, 1.22) in Western Europe. There was no significant subgroup difference across regions (P = 0.70). Baseline risk of MACE and indexes of development status (i.e., Human Development Index, gross domestic product) were independently associated with GLP-1RA efficacy.

Conclusions: This study does not suggest any regional heterogeneity of GLP-1RA efficacy in MACE. However, a higher baseline risk and lower development status were associated with a greater benefit of these drugs.

目的:多区域试验的设计假设是治疗效果适用于整个目标人群,但有几个因素可能会导致治疗效果的地域异质性。我们探讨了在评估胰高血糖素样肽 1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)对 2 型糖尿病患者主要心血管事件(MACE)疗效的试验中是否存在这种差异:我们对 Medline 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统检索,检索时间从开始到 2020 年 6 月 30 日。我们纳入了比较任何 GLP-1RA 与安慰剂的国际随机对照试验,并将 MACE 作为主要终点。随后,我们向发起者或通过数据共享平台索取了参与者的个人数据。对于每项试验,我们都计算了MACE的危险比(HRs)及其95% CIs,并按地区进行了分组。然后,我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并进行了荟萃回归,以评估预先确定的相关变量对治疗效果的影响:我们纳入了六项试验,包括 45,426 名患者。MACE的基线风险从南亚的每100例患者年2.9例到撒哈拉以南非洲的每100例患者年7.4例不等。北非的 MACE HR 为 0.25(95% CI 0.05,1.12),西欧为 0.98(0.79,1.22)。各地区之间没有明显的亚组差异(P = 0.70)。MACE基线风险和发展状况指数(即人类发展指数、国内生产总值)与GLP-1RA疗效独立相关:结论:本研究并未表明GLP-1RA对MACE的疗效存在区域异质性。结论:本研究并未表明 GLP-1RA 对 MACE 的疗效存在地区异质性,但基线风险较高和发展水平较低的患者可从这些药物中获益更多。
{"title":"Regional Heterogeneity of the Results of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Trials in Type 2 Diabetes: A Reanalysis of Individual Participant Data.","authors":"Ariane Jullien, Clément Jambon-Barbara, Jean-Luc Cracowski, Brian L Claggett, Anne-Laure Borel, Charles Khouri, Matthieu Roustit","doi":"10.2337/dca24-0034","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dca24-0034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multiregional trials are designed under the assumption that treatment effect applies to the entire target population, yet several factors may introduce geographic heterogeneity in treatment effect. We explored whether such variations exist in trials assessing the efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in major cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception until 30 June 2020. We included international randomized controlled trials comparing any GLP-1RA versus placebo, with MACE as a primary end point. Individual participant data were subsequently requested from the sponsor or through data sharing platforms. For each trial, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs for MACE, subgrouped by region. We then performed a random-effects meta-analysis and conducted meta-regressions to assess the influence of predetermined variables of interest on treatment effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included six trials including 45,426 patients. Baseline risk of MACE ranged from 2.9 per 100 patient-years in Southern Asia to 7.4 per 100 patient-years in Sub-Saharan Africa. HRs for MACE ranged between 0.25 (95% CI 0.05, 1.12) in Northern Africa to 0.98 (0.79, 1.22) in Western Europe. There was no significant subgroup difference across regions (P = 0.70). Baseline risk of MACE and indexes of development status (i.e., Human Development Index, gross domestic product) were independently associated with GLP-1RA efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study does not suggest any regional heterogeneity of GLP-1RA efficacy in MACE. However, a higher baseline risk and lower development status were associated with a greater benefit of these drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1949-1957"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metformin Use and Risk of Delirium in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. 二甲双胍的使用与 2 型糖尿病老年人谵妄的风险。
Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-1414
Mingyang Sun, Xiaoling Wang, Zhongyuan Lu, Yitian Yang, Shuang Lv, Mengrong Miao, Wan-Ming Chen, Szu-Yuan Wu, Jiaqiang Zhang

Objective: Delirium is a precursor and risk factor for dementia, emphasizing the urgency of effective prevention and management strategies in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Identifying long-term, safe, and effective medications to prevent diabetes-related delirium is crucial because of its significant impact on this population. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effects of metformin against delirium in older adults with T2D, using a competing risk analysis of death to provide a more accurate assessment.

Research design and methods: Metformin users were compared with a cohort of nonusers. Multivariable Cox regression and Fine and Gray methods were used to assess the risk of delirium and mortality.

Results: Our study included 66,568 metformin users and 66,568 nonusers, matched by propensity score. The use of metformin was associated with a significantly lower risk of delirium, with adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 0.77 to 0.81. A dose-response relationship was observed, indicating that higher cumulative and daily doses of metformin were associated with greater reductions in delirium risk.

Conclusions: Metformin use is associated with a reduced risk of delirium in older adults with T2D, with higher doses offering greater protection.

目的:谵妄是痴呆症的前兆和危险因素,因此迫切需要对患有 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的老年人采取有效的预防和管理策略。由于糖尿病相关谵妄对这一人群有重大影响,因此确定长期、安全、有效的药物来预防糖尿病相关谵妄至关重要。本研究旨在评估二甲双胍对患有 T2D 的老年人谵妄的保护作用,采用死亡竞争风险分析法提供更准确的评估:将二甲双胍使用者与非使用者进行比较。研究设计与方法:将二甲双胍使用者与非使用者进行比较,采用多变量 Cox 回归法以及 Fine 和 Gray 方法评估谵妄和死亡风险:我们的研究纳入了 66,568 名二甲双胍使用者和 66,568 名非使用者,并通过倾向评分进行了匹配。使用二甲双胍可显著降低谵妄风险,调整后的危险比为 0.77 至 0.81。研究还发现了一种剂量-反应关系,表明二甲双胍的累积剂量和日剂量越高,谵妄风险越低:结论:二甲双胍的使用与患有糖尿病的老年人谵妄风险的降低有关,剂量越大,保护作用越强。
{"title":"Metformin Use and Risk of Delirium in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Mingyang Sun, Xiaoling Wang, Zhongyuan Lu, Yitian Yang, Shuang Lv, Mengrong Miao, Wan-Ming Chen, Szu-Yuan Wu, Jiaqiang Zhang","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1414","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dc24-1414","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Delirium is a precursor and risk factor for dementia, emphasizing the urgency of effective prevention and management strategies in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Identifying long-term, safe, and effective medications to prevent diabetes-related delirium is crucial because of its significant impact on this population. This study aimed to evaluate the protective effects of metformin against delirium in older adults with T2D, using a competing risk analysis of death to provide a more accurate assessment.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Metformin users were compared with a cohort of nonusers. Multivariable Cox regression and Fine and Gray methods were used to assess the risk of delirium and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 66,568 metformin users and 66,568 nonusers, matched by propensity score. The use of metformin was associated with a significantly lower risk of delirium, with adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 0.77 to 0.81. A dose-response relationship was observed, indicating that higher cumulative and daily doses of metformin were associated with greater reductions in delirium risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Metformin use is associated with a reduced risk of delirium in older adults with T2D, with higher doses offering greater protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142368004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationship Between Sensor-Detected Hypoglycemia and Patient-Reported Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 and Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: The Hypo-METRICS Study. 1 型糖尿病患者和接受胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中传感器检测到的低血糖与患者报告的低血糖之间的关系:Hypo-METRICS 研究。
Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-2332
Patrick Divilly, Gilberte Martine-Edith, Natalie Zaremba, Uffe Søholm, Zeinab Mahmoudi, Monika Cigler, Namam Ali, Evertine J Abbink, Julie Brøsen, Bastiaan de Galan, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Allan A Vaag, Rory J McCrimmon, Eric Renard, Simon Heller, Mark Evans, Julia K Mader, Stephanie A Amiel, Frans Pouwer, Pratik Choudhary

Objective: Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has led to greater detection of hypoglycemia; the clinical significance of this is not fully understood. The Hypoglycaemia-Measurement, Thresholds and Impacts (Hypo-METRICS) study was designed to investigate the rates and duration of sensor-detected hypoglycemia (SDH) and their relationship with person-reported hypoglycemia (PRH) in people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) with prior experience of hypoglycemia.

Research design and methods: We recruited 276 participants with T1D and 321 with T2D who wore a blinded CGM and recorded PRH in the Hypo-METRICS app over 10 weeks. Rates of SDH <70 mg/dL, SDH <54 mg/dL, and PRH were expressed as median episodes per week. Episodes of SDH were matched to episodes of PRH that occurred within 1 h.

Results: Median [interquartile range] rates of hypoglycemia were significantly higher in T1D versus T2D; for SDH <70 mg/dL (6.5 [3.8-10.4] vs. 2.1 [0.8-4.0]), SDH <54 mg/dL (1.2 [0.4-2.5] vs. 0.2 [0.0-0.5]), and PRH (3.9 [2.4-5.9] vs. 1.1 [0.5-2.0]). Overall, 65% of SDH <70 mg/dL was not associated with PRH, and 43% of PRH had no associated SDH. The median proportion of SDH associated with PRH in T1D was higher for SDH <70 mg/dL (40% vs. 22%) and SDH <54 mg/dL (47% vs. 25%) than in T2D.

Conclusions: The novel findings are that at least half of CGM hypoglycemia is asymptomatic, even below 54 mg/dL, and many reported symptomatic hypoglycemia episodes happen above 70 mg/dL. In the clinical and research setting, these episodes cannot be used interchangeably, and both need to be recorded and addressed.

目的:连续血糖监测仪(CGM)的使用提高了低血糖的检出率,但其临床意义尚不完全清楚。低血糖-测量、阈值和影响(Hypo-METRICS)研究旨在调查传感器检测到的低血糖(SDH)的发生率和持续时间,以及它们与个人报告的低血糖(PRH)之间的关系:我们招募了 276 名 T1D 患者和 321 名 T2D 患者,他们在 10 周内佩戴盲法 CGM 并在 Hypo-METRICS 应用程序中记录 PRH。SDH率 结果:T1D 和 T2D 低血糖发生率的中位数[四分位数间距]明显更高;SDH 结论:新发现表明,至少有一半的 T1D 和 T2D 低血糖发生率高于 SDH:新发现是,至少一半的 CGM 低血糖是无症状的,甚至低于 54 毫克/分升,许多报告的无症状低血糖发生在 70 毫克/分升以上。在临床和研究环境中,这些低血糖发作不能交替使用,两者都需要记录和处理。
{"title":"Relationship Between Sensor-Detected Hypoglycemia and Patient-Reported Hypoglycemia in People With Type 1 and Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: The Hypo-METRICS Study.","authors":"Patrick Divilly, Gilberte Martine-Edith, Natalie Zaremba, Uffe Søholm, Zeinab Mahmoudi, Monika Cigler, Namam Ali, Evertine J Abbink, Julie Brøsen, Bastiaan de Galan, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Allan A Vaag, Rory J McCrimmon, Eric Renard, Simon Heller, Mark Evans, Julia K Mader, Stephanie A Amiel, Frans Pouwer, Pratik Choudhary","doi":"10.2337/dc23-2332","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dc23-2332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has led to greater detection of hypoglycemia; the clinical significance of this is not fully understood. The Hypoglycaemia-Measurement, Thresholds and Impacts (Hypo-METRICS) study was designed to investigate the rates and duration of sensor-detected hypoglycemia (SDH) and their relationship with person-reported hypoglycemia (PRH) in people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) with prior experience of hypoglycemia.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We recruited 276 participants with T1D and 321 with T2D who wore a blinded CGM and recorded PRH in the Hypo-METRICS app over 10 weeks. Rates of SDH <70 mg/dL, SDH <54 mg/dL, and PRH were expressed as median episodes per week. Episodes of SDH were matched to episodes of PRH that occurred within 1 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median [interquartile range] rates of hypoglycemia were significantly higher in T1D versus T2D; for SDH <70 mg/dL (6.5 [3.8-10.4] vs. 2.1 [0.8-4.0]), SDH <54 mg/dL (1.2 [0.4-2.5] vs. 0.2 [0.0-0.5]), and PRH (3.9 [2.4-5.9] vs. 1.1 [0.5-2.0]). Overall, 65% of SDH <70 mg/dL was not associated with PRH, and 43% of PRH had no associated SDH. The median proportion of SDH associated with PRH in T1D was higher for SDH <70 mg/dL (40% vs. 22%) and SDH <54 mg/dL (47% vs. 25%) than in T2D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel findings are that at least half of CGM hypoglycemia is asymptomatic, even below 54 mg/dL, and many reported symptomatic hypoglycemia episodes happen above 70 mg/dL. In the clinical and research setting, these episodes cannot be used interchangeably, and both need to be recorded and addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1769-1777"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417281/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142116331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on Zu et al. Association of Body Weight Time in Target Range With the Risk of Kidney Outcomes in Patients With Overweight/Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2024;47:371-378. 评论 Zu 等:《体重在目标范围内的时间与超重/肥胖和 2 型糖尿病患者肾脏预后风险的关系》。糖尿病护理》2024;47:371-378。
Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-1246
Dion Groothof, Thomas Bais, Stephan J L Bakker
{"title":"Comment on Zu et al. Association of Body Weight Time in Target Range With the Risk of Kidney Outcomes in Patients With Overweight/Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2024;47:371-378.","authors":"Dion Groothof, Thomas Bais, Stephan J L Bakker","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1246","DOIUrl":"10.2337/dc24-1246","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":"47 10","pages":"e84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417275/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304560","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Diabetes care
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1