Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias最新文献

Objectives: Tools to identify patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 are as yet unavailable. Our aims were to identify factors associated with nonadverse outcomes and develop a scale to predict nonadverse evolution in patients with COVID-19 (the CoNAE scale) in hospital emergency departments.

Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients who came to one of our area's national health service hospitals for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection from July 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021. From case records we collected sociodemographic information, underlying comorbidity and ongoing treatments, other relevant medical history details, and vital constants on arrival for triage. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors.

Results: The model showed that patients who had nonadverse outcomes were younger, female, and vaccinated against COVID-19 (2 doses at the time of the study). They arrived with normal vital signs (heart rate, diastolic and systolic pressures, temperature, and oxygen saturation) and had none of the following concomitant diseases or factors: heart failure other heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, liver disease, dementia, history of malignant tumors, and they were not being treated with oral or other systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant therapy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.840 (95% CI, 0.834-0.847).

Conclusion: We developed the CoNAE scale to predict nonadverse outcomes. This scale may be useful in triage for evaluating patients with COVID-19. It may also help predict safe discharge or plan the level of care that patients require not only in a hospital emergency department but also in urgent primary care settings or out-of-hospital emergency care.

Objectives: Digoxin toxicity accounts for a small percentage of poisonings attended by emergency departments. This study aimed to describe differences between acute and chronic digoxin toxicity and assess the use of digoxin-specific antibody fragments (digoxin-Fab) as an antidote.

Material and methods: Retrospective, observational, multicenter study in 15 hospital emergency departments in 8 Spanish autonomous communities in 7 years. We collected patient, clinical and treatment variables, and discharge destination. Patients were classified according to whether toxicity was acute or chronic and whether digoxin-Fab was administered or not.

Results: Twenty-seven acute and 631 chronic digoxin poisonings were attended. The mean (SD) patient age was 83.9 (7.9) years, and 76.9% were women. Patients with acute toxicity were younger (80.0 [12] years) than those with chronic toxicity (84.1 [7.7] years) (P .038), and accidental poisoning was less common (in 85.2% vs 100% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Cases of acute toxicity were also more serious (Poison Severity Score (29.6% vs 12.5% in chronic toxicity; P .001). Thirty-four patients were treated with digoxin-Fab (5.4%). These patients were younger (78.7 [11.5] years vs 84.2 (7.6) years), their toxicity was more often acute (in 20.6% vs 3.2% in chronic toxicity), more had attempted suicide (8.8% vs 0.2% with chronic toxicity), and more had severe symptoms (50% vs 11.2%) (P .001, all comparisons). Hospital admission was required for 76.1%. Overall, mortality was 11.4%.

Conclusion: Chronic toxicity accounts for most digoxin poisoning cases, and most patients are women. Acute toxicity is more serious. Patients who required digoxin-Fab have more severe poisoning. Such patients usually have acute toxicity, and attempted suicide is more often the reason for the emergency.

Objectives: The venous-to-arterial CO2 partial pressure difference (CO2) is a marker of how adequately capillary blood flow is able to remove CO2 from tissues, but evidence regarding its usefulness in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is scarce The main objective of this study was to describe the changes in CO2 in patients with cardiogenic shock during the 48 hours after hospital admission. A secondary objective was to analyze the association between CO2 and in-hospital mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiogenic shock refractory to treatment.

Material and methods: Prospective observational exploratory study in a single hospital. Patients in cardiogenic shock who were admitted to a cardiology critical care unit were included. We measured CO2 on inclusion and 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after admission to the unit. Variables were explored with logistic regression analysis and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated.

Results: A total of 50 patients were included. In-hospital mortality due to CVD was 20%. CO2 peaked initially and decreased gradually over the first 48 hours of care. In-hospital mortality tended to be higher in patients with the highest CO2 values, but the difference was not significant. High CO2 values at 24 hours were associated with refractory cardiogenic shock. The negative predictive value of a CO2 value lower than 6 mmHg at 12 hours was 87% for mortality due to CVD.

Conclusion: This exploratory study suggests that CO2 could be a helpful additional marker to measure when managing cardiogenic shock. CO2 lower than 6 mmHg between 12 and 24 hours after admission may identify patients at low risk of death due to CVD or refractory cardiogenic shock.

Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia managed in emergency departments, and the already high prevalence of this arrhythmia is increasing in Spain. This serious condition associated with increased mortality and morbidity has a negative impact on patient quality of life and the functioning of the health care system. The management of AF requires consideration of diverse clinical variables and a large number of possible therapeutic approaches, justifying action plans to coordinate the work of several medical specialties in the interest of providing appropriate care and optimizing resources. This consensus statement brings together recommendations for emergency department management of AF based on available evidence adapted to special circumstances. The statement was drafted by a multidisciplinary team of specialists from the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH). Strategies for stroke prophylaxis, measures to bring heart rate and heart rhythm under control, and related diagnostic and logistic issues are discussed in detail.