Journal of cancer research and therapeutics最新文献

Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a serious health disease that can lead to a reduced quality of life or even death. It ranks sixth in terms of cancer expansion. It is one of India's primary causes of natural death. In OSCC such potentially malignant Disorders (PMDs) are precancerous lesions with such a high risk of progression. Tumor angiogenesis is a one of the basic biomarkers that may influence the proliferation of a precancerous lesion into the cancerous lesion. Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) also play important roles in carcinogenesis by promoting angiogenesis. The construction of new vessels of blood from existing vasculature is referred as angiogenesis.

Aim of the study: To get deep insights of immunohistochemistry expression of VEGF, BDNF, and TRKB in oral epithelial dysplasia (OED), verrucous carcinoma (VC), and OSCC.

Material and methods: The study included 100 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from 20 cases of OED, 20 cases of VC, and 60 cases of OSCC [20 cases of well-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma (WD-OSCC), 20 cases of moderately differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma (MD-OSCC), and 20 cases of poorly differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma (PD-OSCC). The staining intensity and distribution of VEGF, BNDF, and TrkB were examined and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc Bonferroni test, independent t-test, Pearson's Chi-square test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient test.

Results: The immunoexpression of VEGF, BDNF, and TrkB was found to be elevated in the order of OEDs, VC, and OSCC. The percentage of positive was highest in PD-OSCC, followed by MD-OSCC and WD-OSCC.

Conclusion: Based on our findings, angiogenesis plays a significant role in tumor growth and metastasis. A substantial relationship was discovered between VEGF, BDNF, TrkB expression, and increases in vascularity throughout the transition from OEDs to VCs and OSCCs.

Introduction: Chemotherapy in an integral part of cancer treatment, either administered alone or in combination with radiation. However, the cost of these drugs is often prohibitively high for most patients. To address this issue, the Government of India has established Jan Aushadhi (JAS) stores across the country, where affordable generic medicines are available. In the current study, we performed a cost minimization analysis comparing JAS drugs with branded chemotherapeutic drugs used in various cancer treatment regimens.

Objectives: This study was to conduct a cost-minimization analysis by comparing the costs of different regimens when using JAS drugs, the most expensive branded drugs, and the least expensive branded drugs in the treatment of cancer in India.

Materials and methods: The study focused on conducting a cost minimization analysis of various chemotherapy drugs used in the treatment of different cancers, considering the availability of anticancer drugs at JAS stores. The costs for different chemotherapy regimens, including both anticancer and supportive drugs, were calculated for single and complete cycles. The costs of the most expensive and least expensive branded drugs were noted from the Current Index of Medical Stores. The cost difference (CD) was calculated by subtracting the cost of the cheaper drug from that of the costliest brand. The cost ratio (CR) and the percentage of cost variation (PCV) were calculated for India-specific conditions.

Results: The study analyzed the CD for various regimens using JAS drugs for chemotherapy treatment of breast, esophagus, rectal, colon, stomach, prostate, ovary, endometrial, cervical, head and neck, lung, multiple myeloma, testicular, and lymphoma cancers. It also considered chemoirradiation regimens for brain, head and neck, anorectal, esophageal, and uterine cervical cancers. Significant CDs were observed when both anticancer and supportive drugs were obtained from JAS stores.

Conclusion: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to consider the CD, CR, and PCV for various regimens using JAS drugs, as well as the costliest and cheapest branded drugs in standard cancer treatment regimens. The results of this study are expected to assist healthcare professionals and pharmacists in understanding the cost-saving benefits of substituting expensive branded drugs with more affordable chemotherapeutic drugs for the treatment of cancer. This substitution can provide financial benefit for socioeconomically marginalized population.

Background: Many methods have been developed for localizing non-palpable breast lesions. This study investigated the success rate and surgical results of the magnetic seed (Magseed) and radiofrequency identification (RFID) method, which are relatively new compared to standard wire-guided localizations.

Materials and methods: 20 simulation (10 Magseed, 10 RFID) models were created using turkey breasts and raisins. Raisins containing magnetic seed and RFID tags were placed on the turkey breast. Sentimag® probe was used for the Magseed group, and Faxitron LOCalizer™ System device was used in the RFID group. Both methods were evaluated in terms of accuracy in detecting breast lesion localization, operation times, excised tissue weights, total resection volume, surgical margin negativity, and re-excision rates.

Results: Lesion localization success in both techniques was 100%. While procedure times were statistically significantly shorter in the Magseed group, incision lengths were shorter in the RFID group (P = 0.013, P = 0.007, respectively). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups for the weight of the removed parts, total resection volume, and surgical margin distance (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: In this feasibility study, it was concluded that neither the RFID nor Magseed methods had a significant advantage over each other, in terms of localization detection and surgical margin negativity, and both methods could be used successfully for localization.

Abstract: Primary treatment with brachytherapy for oral cancer is uncommon in large malignant lesions; however, it is preferred by radiation oncologists for initial and smaller-sized lesions in compromised anatomical locations. The purpose of this report is to introduce and discuss the fabrication of a customized brachytherapy applicator for a case of well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral commissures using a radiotherapy thermoplastic mold (RTM). The RTM was molded into the shape of tongs and two acrylic wings were attached to these customized tongs to secure five high-dose radiotherapy catheter tubes. A mouth-stabilizing stent was used to stabilize the oral cavity throughout the brachytherapy process. A total dose of 45.5 Gy was delivered in 13 fractions to the lesion using a Cobalt-60 source over 35 days. At the end of the brachytherapy treatment and a follow-up period of 3 months, the patient responded well, and complete remission of the lesion was observed. The current brachytherapy applicator technique is a simple, viable, and curative option for patients with lesions in difficult -to- access anatomic locations.

Purpose: Tumor-associated serum markers have demonstrated predictive and prognostic value in patients being treated for malignancies. However, the clinical importance of tumor markers in gastric cancers (GC) is poorly standardized.

Objectives: The objective is to assess the clinical utility of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as serum tumor markers in advanced GC.

Methods: In this prospective study, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels were measured at baseline and after three cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC. The association of tumor marker levels with prognosis and decline of tumor markers with radiological overall response rates (ORR) and survival were analyzed.

Results: In the 105 patients, the proportion of patients with elevated baseline CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels was 55% (N = 58) and 37% (N = 39) based on predefined cutoffs. Response assessment was done for 61 patients who received a minimum of three cycles of chemotherapy. A 15% and 13% reduction of serum levels from baseline for CYFRA 21-1 and CEA were selected for defining "CYFRA 21-1 response" and "CEA-response," respectively. Both responses were significant predictors of radiological ORR. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months in the entire cohort and 13 months for patients who received at least three cycles of chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, baseline CEA levels and ECOG status were significant predictors of OS. In a subset analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, any of the tumor marker responses predicted improved 1-year OS.

Conclusion: In advanced GC, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA decline from baseline appeared to be reliable surrogate markers of chemotherapy efficacy and improved survival.

Objective: The current treatment of pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) is a multimodal risk-based approach. Today, smaller fields and lower doses of radiotherapy (RT) have become standard. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and toxicity profile in children with NRSTS that received RT as a part of multimodal therapy.

Methods: Twenty-nine patients with pediatric NRSTS treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant RT between 1998 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses.

Results: Median follow-up was 36 months (range, 6-291 months). The median neoadjuvant and adjuvant RT doses were 50 Gy (range, 45-66 Gy) and 54 Gy (45-66 Gy), respectively. During follow-up, six (21%) patients developed a local recurrence and 10 (35%) had distant metastasis. The 5-year local control, overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rate was 79%, 67%, 59%, and 61%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a ≤5-cm tumor, gross tumor resection, Children's Oncology Group (COG) low-risk group, and absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent favorable prognostic factors for OS. Severe (≥ grade 3) late toxicity was observed in 6 (20%) patients.

Conclusions: RT is a crucial component in the multimodal risk-based treatment approach for pediatric NRSTS. However, late toxicity rates are still high and should be improved. Patients with a ≤5-cm tumor, COG low-risk group and treated with gross tumor resection have increased survival rates.

Introduction: Brainstem is a rare yet challenging site for primary brain tumors. We present the patient characteristics, treatment-related details, and survival outcomes of patients with brain stem gliomas treated over a decade, from August 2010 to July 2022, at a tertiary care center in northern India.

Materials and methods: Twenty-seven patients of brainstem gliomas were treated in our hospital from August 2010 to July 2022. All of these patients were treated with radiation therapy based on a radiological diagnosis only. Data were collected and analyzed from patient registration, treatment, and follow-up records.

Results: Of the 27 patients, 18 were male and 9 were female. Fourteen patients (51.85%) were in the pediatric age group (<12 years). The most common symptom at onset was hemiparesis, seen in 62.96%. The majority of the patients (24; 88.88%) had pontine involvement at the time of treatment. Overall survival at a minimum 2-year follow-up post-treatment was 22.22% in the entire cohort. Age, sex, or size of tumor at presentation was not seen to have any significant impact on survival of patients.

Conclusion: With the advancement in surgical techniques and molecular analysis of brain tumors, there is likely to be a change in the management of brainstem gliomas; however, radiation therapy has been used for the management of these tumors for decades now. Radiation therapy continues to show rapid and significant radiological and clinical improvement in the majority of such patients, and it would continue to play an important part in multi-modality management.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the dysphagia-aspiration-related structures (DARS) in various head and neck cancer sites treated with definitive DARS-optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.

Materials and methods: Target volumes, organs at risk, and in addition, individual DARS were delineated, including the superior, middle, and inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles, supraglottic and glottic larynx, the base of the tongue, esophageal inlet muscles and cervical esophagus in 35 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Volume-based dose constraints were applied to the DARS outside the planning target volume (PTV). An IMRT plan was then generated to limit doses to DARS without compromising PTV dose coverage.

Results: Twelve (34.3%) patients had an oropharyngeal primary (OPX), 18 (51.4%) had a laryngeal, and 5 (14.3%) patients had hypopharyngeal primary. The mean dose to the DARS was 47.93 Gy for the entire group, while it was 54.6 Gy in oropharyngeal primaries and 44.4 Gy in laryngopharyngeal primaries. DARS mean dose of ≤45 Gy could be achieved in a significantly lesser number of patients with oropharyngeal primaries (P < 0.02). Similarly, DARS mean dose was 42.25 Gy in patients with N0 disease, 49.6 Gy with ipsilateral involved nodes, and 55 Gy with bilateral disease. Sparing of DARS was feasible when the volume of PTV was ≤150 cc (P < 0.025).

Conclusion: Sparing of DARS structures appears to be challenging in patients with oropharyngeal cancers without compromising the dose to the PTVs while it is feasible in laryngopharyngeal cancers. DARS sparing is feasible when the PTV volume is < 150 cc and in patients with negative or unilateral nodal disease.

Abstract: Oxaliplatin is a common drug used in the management of colorectal malignancies. Rare neurological side effects including amaurosis fugax, urinary retention, stroke, cranial nerve palsy, dysarthria, and dysphagia have been reported in the literature. Usually, such incidences are reported immediately after 1st dose of oxaliplatin infusion. We report a rare transient ischemic attack (TIA))-like side effects after 2nd dose of oxaliplatin infusion.