Yotam Papo, Jillian Harvey, Dunc Williams, Kit N Simpson, Jay Hinesley, Allen Abernethy, Dee W Ford, Marc Heincelman
As rural hospitals experiencing low patient volume and workforce shortages continue to close nationally, we present an innovative telemedicine care delivery model utilized to support the opening of a new 25-bed rural hospital in South Carolina in 2023. Since opening, the tele-hospitalist service has been responsible for 84% of discharged patients with high patient experience scores. From quarter 1 to quarter 6, patients were admitted from a growing market area with a financially more favorable payer mix while demonstrating comparable clinical outcomes. We believe this model has the potential to be replicated in other rural hospitals throughout the United States.
{"title":"Tele-hospitalist services to support the opening of a new rural hospital.","authors":"Yotam Papo, Jillian Harvey, Dunc Williams, Kit N Simpson, Jay Hinesley, Allen Abernethy, Dee W Ford, Marc Heincelman","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As rural hospitals experiencing low patient volume and workforce shortages continue to close nationally, we present an innovative telemedicine care delivery model utilized to support the opening of a new 25-bed rural hospital in South Carolina in 2023. Since opening, the tele-hospitalist service has been responsible for 84% of discharged patients with high patient experience scores. From quarter 1 to quarter 6, patients were admitted from a growing market area with a financially more favorable payer mix while demonstrating comparable clinical outcomes. We believe this model has the potential to be replicated in other rural hospitals throughout the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145859730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As pediatric and neonatal hospitalists assume increasing care for newborns in the delivery room and during the birth hospitalization, preparing pediatric trainees with foundational skills in neonatal resuscitation is increasingly critical. However, residency programs may face challenges in providing sufficient delivery room exposure and procedural opportunities given newer training requirements and updated care practices that reduce procedural interventions during neonatal resuscitation. In this Perspectives article, we examine factors contributing to these gaps, describe our institution's hospitalist-led strategies to optimize resident delivery room training, and highlight complementary educational approaches and future directions to optimally prepare trainees entering the hospital workforce.
{"title":"Contemporary challenges and strategies in delivery room training for pediatric residents.","authors":"Irene Jun, Arun Gupta, Neha S Joshi","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As pediatric and neonatal hospitalists assume increasing care for newborns in the delivery room and during the birth hospitalization, preparing pediatric trainees with foundational skills in neonatal resuscitation is increasingly critical. However, residency programs may face challenges in providing sufficient delivery room exposure and procedural opportunities given newer training requirements and updated care practices that reduce procedural interventions during neonatal resuscitation. In this Perspectives article, we examine factors contributing to these gaps, describe our institution's hospitalist-led strategies to optimize resident delivery room training, and highlight complementary educational approaches and future directions to optimally prepare trainees entering the hospital workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145859696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Accurate jaundice detection: Penlight versus smartphone light.","authors":"Michael Osnard, John Woller","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70247","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Abnormal sleep during acute illness: Therapeutic opportunity or allostatic phenomenon.","authors":"Matthew B Maas","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70246","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher J Smith, Jesse Umbra, Sofia Quintero, Austin Wilson, Elizabeth Lyden, Nidish Tiwari, Brian Shahan, Jana Wardian
Background: Left atrial enlargement (LAE) is predictive of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Prior studies of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) interpretation methods for identifying LAE utilized older echocardiographic reference ranges.
Objectives: Compare the test characteristics of hospitalist-performed POCUS techniques for identifying LAE as compared to contemporary echocardiographic reference ranges.
Methods: Fully paired, comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two index tests applied to archived echocardiogram images: visual assessment of the left atrium to aorta diameter (LAE sign) and left atrial (LA) anteroposterior diameter >4 cm in the parasternal long axis view. The reference test was moderate to severe LAE by echocardiography-derived left atrial volumetric index.
Results: After exclusion criteria, 239 of 321 (74.5%) exams were included. The LAE sign had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 67.5%, 71.4%, 32.1%, and 91.6%. LA diameter of >4 cm had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 87.5%, 75.9%, 42.2%, and 96.8%. The difference in sensitivity (p = .005) and specificity (p = .049) between the index tests was statistically significant. The diameter measurement had better positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + 3.63, LR-0.16) than the LAE sign (LR + 2.36, LR- 0.46).
Conclusions: Both POCUS techniques for diagnosing LAE performed reasonably well compared to current echocardiographic reference ranges, with LA diameter >4 cm having better sensitivity and specificity than visual estimation of the LAE sign. These tests can help identify patients at risk for cardiovascular disease who may benefit from echocardiogram referral.
{"title":"Comparative diagnostic accuracy study of point of care ultrasound techniques for detection of left atrial enlargement by hospital medicine physicians from archived echocardiogram images.","authors":"Christopher J Smith, Jesse Umbra, Sofia Quintero, Austin Wilson, Elizabeth Lyden, Nidish Tiwari, Brian Shahan, Jana Wardian","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left atrial enlargement (LAE) is predictive of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Prior studies of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) interpretation methods for identifying LAE utilized older echocardiographic reference ranges.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Compare the test characteristics of hospitalist-performed POCUS techniques for identifying LAE as compared to contemporary echocardiographic reference ranges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fully paired, comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two index tests applied to archived echocardiogram images: visual assessment of the left atrium to aorta diameter (LAE sign) and left atrial (LA) anteroposterior diameter >4 cm in the parasternal long axis view. The reference test was moderate to severe LAE by echocardiography-derived left atrial volumetric index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusion criteria, 239 of 321 (74.5%) exams were included. The LAE sign had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 67.5%, 71.4%, 32.1%, and 91.6%. LA diameter of >4 cm had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 87.5%, 75.9%, 42.2%, and 96.8%. The difference in sensitivity (p = .005) and specificity (p = .049) between the index tests was statistically significant. The diameter measurement had better positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + 3.63, LR-0.16) than the LAE sign (LR + 2.36, LR- 0.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both POCUS techniques for diagnosing LAE performed reasonably well compared to current echocardiographic reference ranges, with LA diameter >4 cm having better sensitivity and specificity than visual estimation of the LAE sign. These tests can help identify patients at risk for cardiovascular disease who may benefit from echocardiogram referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746347","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"My sister's ordeal: Even a \"best hospital\" may fail seniors with comorbidities.","authors":"Stephen R Weissman","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70243","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jhm.70243","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The subtle art of influential leadership.","authors":"Rachel J Peterson, Brittany Hubbell","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70240","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amanda J Ullman, Toni Day, Rebecca Doyle, Nicole Marsh, Fiona M Coyer, Deanne August, Roni Cole, Samantha Keogh, Tricia M Kleidon, Craig A McBride, Mari Takashima, Hui Grace Xu, Lauren N Kearney, Joshua M Byrnes, Clare Thomas, Sarfaraz Rahiman, Halley Ruppel, Christopher Bonafide, Brigid Gillespie, Callan Battley, Victoria Gibson, Sabrina de Souza, Anna Doubrovsky, Mark W Davies, Martha A Q Curley, Robert S Ware
Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are a vital part of care for hospitalized children. Despite commonality, up to 45% fail before treatment completion, with up to 20% of PIVCs resulting in an infusate-associated injury, such as infiltration or extravasation. Biosensors developed to detect preclinical signs of intravenous catheter dysfunction have the potential to prevent significant injuries.
Methods: This multi-site, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial will evaluate an IV biosensor for preventing infiltration/extravasation injuries in hospitalized neonates and infants. Participants up to 1 year of age who require a PIVC with continuous or moderate-high risk infusates will be recruited from three Australian hospitals. Participants (n = 532) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either standard observation plus IV biosensor or standard observation alone. The primary outcome is infiltration/extravasation injury occurrence, measured using the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre Extravasation Harm Scale by the masked outcome assessment committee. Secondary outcomes include infiltration/extravasation severity, volume, treatment sequelae, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation context exploration will use mixed methods, including ecological momentary assessments and semi-structured interviews, to evaluate barriers and facilitators for future implementation.
Discussion: The PATCH trial addresses a significant gap in evidence regarding the effectiveness and implementation of IV biosensor technology in preventing extravasation injuries in vulnerable infant and neonatal populations. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation study will provide comprehensive data to inform both clinical practice and future implementation strategies.
{"title":"Preventing InfusAte injuries throughout a Child's Hospitalization (PATCH): Study protocol for a type 1 hybrid randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Amanda J Ullman, Toni Day, Rebecca Doyle, Nicole Marsh, Fiona M Coyer, Deanne August, Roni Cole, Samantha Keogh, Tricia M Kleidon, Craig A McBride, Mari Takashima, Hui Grace Xu, Lauren N Kearney, Joshua M Byrnes, Clare Thomas, Sarfaraz Rahiman, Halley Ruppel, Christopher Bonafide, Brigid Gillespie, Callan Battley, Victoria Gibson, Sabrina de Souza, Anna Doubrovsky, Mark W Davies, Martha A Q Curley, Robert S Ware","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are a vital part of care for hospitalized children. Despite commonality, up to 45% fail before treatment completion, with up to 20% of PIVCs resulting in an infusate-associated injury, such as infiltration or extravasation. Biosensors developed to detect preclinical signs of intravenous catheter dysfunction have the potential to prevent significant injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-site, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial will evaluate an IV biosensor for preventing infiltration/extravasation injuries in hospitalized neonates and infants. Participants up to 1 year of age who require a PIVC with continuous or moderate-high risk infusates will be recruited from three Australian hospitals. Participants (n = 532) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either standard observation plus IV biosensor or standard observation alone. The primary outcome is infiltration/extravasation injury occurrence, measured using the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre Extravasation Harm Scale by the masked outcome assessment committee. Secondary outcomes include infiltration/extravasation severity, volume, treatment sequelae, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation context exploration will use mixed methods, including ecological momentary assessments and semi-structured interviews, to evaluate barriers and facilitators for future implementation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The PATCH trial addresses a significant gap in evidence regarding the effectiveness and implementation of IV biosensor technology in preventing extravasation injuries in vulnerable infant and neonatal populations. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation study will provide comprehensive data to inform both clinical practice and future implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ACTRN12623000561684.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145717088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Albert K Park, Jason Hom, Javier Lorenzo, Vidya Rao, Gavin Hui, Matthew Vickers, Neera Ahuja
Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists are increasingly prescribed for obesity and type 2 diabetes. GLP-1 agonists influence body composition through effects on both fat mass and fat-free mass. Given that critically ill patients experience severe protein catabolism and commonly develop intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness, questions arise about outcomes when metabolic demands are high during critical illness.
Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between prior GLP-1 agonist use and critical care outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Stanford Health Care data from January 2015 to July 2024. Adults aged 18-89 years admitted to intensive care with body mass index (BMI) 20-60 kg/m2 were included. Of 15,191 eligible ICU patients, 468 (3.1%) received GLP-1 agonist prescriptions within 12 months before hospitalization. Using high-dimensional propensity score matching with lasso regression, we created 452 matched pairs and compared in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length of stay between groups.
Results: Baseline characteristics were well-balanced. The matched GLP-1 agonist and comparison groups showed similar in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs. 4.9%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 to 1.91, p = .88), mean hospital length of stay (13.7 ± 21.3 vs. 13.4 ± 18.1 days, mean difference [MD]: 0.38, 95% CI: -2.21 to 3.05, p = .77), and ICU length of stay (5.9 ± 9.0 vs. 5.4 ± 6.6 days, MD: 0.51, 95% CI: -0.52 to 1.50, p = .33).
Conclusions: In this first study examining the relationship between prior GLP-1 agonist use and critical care outcomes, we found no significant associations with in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, or ICU length of stay.
背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)激动剂越来越多地被用于治疗肥胖和2型糖尿病。GLP-1激动剂通过影响脂肪量和无脂肪量来影响身体成分。鉴于危重患者会经历严重的蛋白质分解代谢,并且通常会出现重症监护病房(ICU)获得性虚弱,在危重疾病期间代谢需求高时,结果会出现问题。目的:本研究的目的是检查既往GLP-1激动剂使用与危重监护结果之间的关系。方法:采用2015年1月至2024年7月斯坦福大学医疗保健中心的数据进行回顾性队列研究。纳入年龄在18-89岁,体重指数(BMI)为20-60 kg/m2的重症监护成人。在15,191例符合条件的ICU患者中,468例(3.1%)在住院前12个月内接受了GLP-1激动剂处方。使用高维倾向评分匹配和套索回归,我们创建了452对匹配对,并比较了两组之间的住院死亡率、住院时间和ICU住院时间。结果:基线特征平衡良好。匹配GLP-1激动剂组和对照组的住院死亡率相似(5.1% vs. 4.9%,优势比[OR]: 1.05, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.58 ~ 1.91, p =。88),平均住院时间(13.7±21.3天vs 13.4±18.1天),平均差异[MD]: 0.38, 95% CI: -2.21 ~ 3.05, p =。77), ICU住院天数(5.9±9.0 vs 5.4±6.6天,MD: 0.51, 95% CI: -0.52 ~ 1.50, p = 0.33)。结论:在首次研究GLP-1激动剂使用与危重监护结果之间关系的研究中,我们发现与住院死亡率、住院时间或ICU住院时间没有显著关联。
{"title":"Prior GLP-1 agonist use is not associated with adverse inpatient critical care outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis.","authors":"Albert K Park, Jason Hom, Javier Lorenzo, Vidya Rao, Gavin Hui, Matthew Vickers, Neera Ahuja","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70228","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70228","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists are increasingly prescribed for obesity and type 2 diabetes. GLP-1 agonists influence body composition through effects on both fat mass and fat-free mass. Given that critically ill patients experience severe protein catabolism and commonly develop intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness, questions arise about outcomes when metabolic demands are high during critical illness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between prior GLP-1 agonist use and critical care outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Stanford Health Care data from January 2015 to July 2024. Adults aged 18-89 years admitted to intensive care with body mass index (BMI) 20-60 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were included. Of 15,191 eligible ICU patients, 468 (3.1%) received GLP-1 agonist prescriptions within 12 months before hospitalization. Using high-dimensional propensity score matching with lasso regression, we created 452 matched pairs and compared in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length of stay between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were well-balanced. The matched GLP-1 agonist and comparison groups showed similar in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs. 4.9%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 to 1.91, p = .88), mean hospital length of stay (13.7 ± 21.3 vs. 13.4 ± 18.1 days, mean difference [MD]: 0.38, 95% CI: -2.21 to 3.05, p = .77), and ICU length of stay (5.9 ± 9.0 vs. 5.4 ± 6.6 days, MD: 0.51, 95% CI: -0.52 to 1.50, p = .33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this first study examining the relationship between prior GLP-1 agonist use and critical care outcomes, we found no significant associations with in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, or ICU length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145598480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}