Journal of hospital medicine最新文献

Background: "Decision Fatigue" (DF) describes the impaired ability to make decisions because of repeated acts of decision-making.

Objectives: We conducted a scoping review to describe DF in inpatient settings.

Methods: To be included, studies should have explored a clinical decision, included a mechanism to account for the order of decision making, and be published in English in or after the year 2000. Six databases were searched. Retrieved citations were screened and retained studies were reviewed against the inclusion criteria. References of included studies were manually searched, and forward citation searches were conducted to capture relevant sources.

Results: The search retrieved 12,781 citations, of which 41 were retained following screening. Following review, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Half were conference abstracts and none examined hospitalists. Emergency medicine and intensive care settings were the most frequently studied clinical environments (n = 13, 81%). All studies were observational. The most frequently examined decisions were about resource utilization (n = 8, 50%), however only half of these examined downstream clinical outcomes. Decision quality against prespecified standards was examined in four (25%) studies. Work environment and patient attributes were often described but not consistently accounted for in analyses. Clinician attributes were described in four (25%) investigations. Findings were inconsistent: both supporting and refuting DF's role in the outcome studied.

Conclusions: The role of clinician, patient, and work environment attributes in mediating DF is understudied. Similarly, the context surrounding the decision under study require further explication and when assessing resource use and decision quality, adjudication should be made against prespecified standards.

Background: Hospital readmissions pose significant burdens on healthcare systems, particularly among older adults. While efforts to reduce readmissions have historically focused on medical management, emerging evidence suggests physical function may also play a role in successful care transitions. However, there is a limited understanding of the relationship between functional measures and readmission risk. This systematic review aims to assess the association between physical function impairments and hospital readmissions.

Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the association between physical function impairments and hospital readmissions.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with studies identified through databases including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and others published January 1, 2010-December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed observational studies of adults aged 50 and older in the United States, reporting readmissions within 90 days of discharge and assessing physical function across domains of the International Classification of Function model. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by two authors using theScottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) tool.

Results: Seventeen studies, representing 80,008 participants, were included in this systematic review. Patient populations included a wide array of medical populations, including general medical inpatients and those undergoing cardiac surgery. Across various functional measures assessed before or during admission, impairments were consistently associated with increased risk for hospital readmissions up to 90 days after admission. Measures of participation, including life-space mobility, were also associated with increased readmission risk.

Conclusions: Functional impairments are robust predictors of hospital readmissions in older adults. Routine assessment of physical function during hospitalization can improve risk stratification and may support successful care transitions, particularly in older adults.

Background: High-quality trial evidence supports the use of one dose of dexamethasone in the outpatient management of croup; however, there are no inpatient trials, and the optimal treatment regimen for the inpatient management of croup remains uncertain. Significant practice variability exists in the corticosteroid treatment of children hospitalized for croup.

Objective: To evaluate the association of dexamethasone treatment regimen (1 vs. >1 dose) with hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30-day return to emergency department (ED) visits among children hospitalized for croup.

Methods: A cohort study of children hospitalized for croup at a children's hospital between 2010 and 2022. Children less than 10 years old, without known airway anomalies and who received dexamethasone for croup treatment were included. Children who received 1 dose versus >1 dose of dexamethasone were compared. Propensity score analyses, using inverse probability of treatment weighting, were conducted to estimate the treatment effects of dexamethasone regimen on hospital LOS and all-cause 30-day return to ED visit.

Results: Of 471 children hospitalized for croup, 229 (49%) received 1 dose of dexamethasone; 242 (51%) received >1 dose. In the propensity-weighted analyses, children receiving >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer mean LOS by 59.6 h (95% CI 44.8-74.5, p < .001) compared with those receiving >1 dose. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of all-cause 30-day return to ED visit; OR 1.30, (95% CI 0.76-2.22, p = .33).

Conclusions: Among children hospitalized for croup, children who received >1 dose of dexamethasone had a longer LOS compared with children who received 1 dose of dexamethasone; however, there was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day return to ED visits. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal dexamethasone treatment regimen for children hospitalized with croup.

Background: Serious Illness Conversations (SICs) are not consistently integrated into existing inpatient workflows.

Objective: We assessed the implementation of multiple interventions aimed at encouraging SICs with hospitalized patients.

Methods: We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify determinants for conducting SICs by interviewing providers and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change to develop a list of interventions. Adult patient encounters with a Readmission Risk Score (RRS) > 28% admitted to a general medicine service from January 2019 to October 2021 and without standardized SIC documentation in the prior year were included. A multivariable segmented logistic regression model, suitable for an interrupted time series analysis, was used to assess changes in the odds of standardized SIC documentation.

Results: Barriers included those associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, such as extreme census. Facilitators included the presence of the Speaking About Goals and Expectations program and palliative care consultations. Key interventions included patient identification via the existing Quality and Safety Dashboard (QSD), weekly emails, in-person outreach, and training for faculty and trainees. There was no significant change in the odds of standardized SIC documentation despite interventions (change in temporal trend odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.98-1.39).

Conclusion: The lack of significant change in standardized SIC documentation may be attributed to insufficient or ineffective interventions and COVID-19-related challenges. Although patient identification is a known barrier to SICs, this issue was minimized with the use of the QSD and RRS. Further research is needed to enhance the implementation of SICs in inpatient settings.