High-activity radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for metastatic thyroid cancer (TC) requires isolation to minimize radiation exposure to third parties, thus posing challenges for patients needing hands-on care. There are limited data on the approach to high-activity RAI treatment in paraplegic patients. We report a state-of-the-art multidisciplinary approach to the management of bedbound patients, covering necessary radiation safety measures that lead to radiation exposure levels as low as reasonably achievable. Given the limited literature resources on standardized approaches, we provide a practical example of the safe and successful treatment of a woman with BRAFV600E-mutant tall-cell-variant papillary TC and pulmonary metastases, who underwent dabrafenib redifferentiation before RAI therapy. The patient was 69 y old and had become paraplegic because of a motor-vehicle accident. Since caring for a paraplegic patient with neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction poses radiation safety challenges, a multidisciplinary team comprising endocrinologists, nuclear medicine physicians, radiation safety specialists, and the nursing department developed a radiation mitigation strategy to ensure patient and staff safety during RAI therapy. The proposed standardized approach includes thorough monitoring of radiation levels in the workplace, providing additional protective equipment for workers who handle radioactive materials or are in direct patient contact, and implementing strict guidelines for safely disposing of radioactive waste such as urine collected in lead-lined containers. This approach requires enhanced training, role preparation, and practice; use of physical therapy equipment to increase the exposure distance; and estimation of the safe exposure time for caregivers based on dosimetry. The effective and safe treatment of metastatic TC in paraplegic patients can be successfully implemented with a comprehensive radiation mitigation strategy and thorough surveying of personnel for contamination.
Alzheimer disease is a neurodegenerative disorder with limited treatment options. It is characterized by the presence of several biomarkers, including amyloid-β aggregates, which lead to oxidative stress and neuronal decay. Targeted α-therapy (TAT) has been shown to be efficacious against metastatic cancer. TAT takes advantage of tumor-localized α-particle emission to break disease-associated covalent bonds while minimizing radiation dose to healthy tissues due to the short, micrometer-level, distances traveled. We hypothesized that TAT could be used to break covalent bonds within amyloid-β aggregates and facilitate natural plaque clearance mechanisms. Methods: We synthesized a 213Bi-chelate-linked benzofuran pyridyl derivative (BiBPy) and generated [213Bi]BiBPy, with a specific activity of 120.6 GBq/μg, dissociation constant of 11 ± 1.5 nM, and logP of 0.14 ± 0.03. Results: As the first step toward the validation of [213Bi]BiBPy as a TAT agent for the reduction of Alzheimer disease-associated amyloid-β, we showed that brain homogenates from APP/PS1 double-transgenic male mice (6-9 mo old) incubated with [213Bi]BiBPy exhibited a marked reduction in amyloid-β plaque concentration as measured using both enzyme-linked immunosorbent and Western blotting assays, with a half-maximal effective concentration of 3.72 kBq/pg. Conclusion: This [213Bi]BiBPy-concentration-dependent activity shows that TAT can reduce amyloid plaque concentration in vitro and supports the development of targeting systems for in vivo validations.
Everolimus and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT, 177Lu-DOTATATE) are 2 treatments recommended in guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. However, the best treatment sequence remains unknown. Methods: We designed a retrospective multicenter study that included patients from the national prospective database of the Groupe d'Étude des Tumeurs Endocrines who had been treated using everolimus and PRRT between April 2004 and October 2022. The primary aim was to compare the 2 treatments (everolimus and PRRT) in terms of efficacy and safety, and the secondary aim was to evaluate the sequences (PRRT followed by everolimus or everolimus followed by PRRT) based on overall progression-free survival (PFS) (PFS during first treatment + PFS during second treatment) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Results: Both treatments were used for 84 patients. The objective response rate and median PFS were 5 (6.0%) and 16.1 mo (95% CI, 11.5-20.7 mo), respectively, under everolimus and 19 (22.6%) and 24.5 mo (95% CI, 17.7-31.3 mo), respectively, for PRRT. The safety profile was also better for PRRT. Median overall PFS was 43.2 mo (95% CI, 33.7-52.7 mo) for the everolimus-PRRT sequence and 30.6 mo (95% CI, 17.8-43.4 mo) for the PRRT-everolimus sequence (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.39-1.24; P = 0.22). Conclusion: PRRT was more effective and less toxic than everolimus. Overall PFS was similar between the 2 sequences, suggesting case-by-case discussion if the patient is eligible for both treatments, but PRRT should be used first when an objective response is needed or in frail populations.
Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a rare childhood malignancy with poor prognosis. There are no effective treatment options other than external beam therapy. We conducted a pilot, first-in-human study using 124I-omburtamab imaging and theranostics as a therapeutic approach using a localized convection-enhanced delivery (CED) technique for administering radiolabeled antibody. We report the detailed pharmacokinetics and dosimetry results of intratumoral delivery of 124I-omburtamab. Methods: Forty-five DIPG patients who received 9.0-370.7 MBq of 124I-omburtamab intratumorally via CED underwent serial brain and whole-body PET/CT imaging at 3-5 time points after injection within 4, 24-48, 72-96, 120-144, and 168-240 h from the end of infusion. Serial blood samples were obtained for kinetic analysis. Whole-body, blood, lesion, and normal-tissue activities were measured, kinetic parameters (uptake and clearance half-life times) estimated, and radiation-absorbed doses calculated using the OLINDA software program. Results: All patients showed prominent activity within the lesion that was retained over several days and was detectable up to the last time point of imaging, with a mean 124I residence time in the lesion of 24.9 h and dose equivalent of 353 ± 181 mSv/MBq. Whole-body doses were low, with a dose equivalent of 0.69 ± 0.28 mSv/MBq. Systemic distribution and activities in normal organs and blood were low. Radiation dose to blood was very low, with a mean value of 0.27 ± 0.21 mGy/MBq. Whole-body clearance was monoexponential with a mean biologic half-life of 62.7 h and an effective half-life of 37.9 h. Blood clearance was biexponential, with a mean biologic half-life of 22.2 h for the rapid α phase and 155 h for the slower β phase. Conclusion: Intratumoral CED of 124I-omburtamab is a novel theranostics approach in DIPG. It allows for delivery of high radiation doses to the DIPG lesions, with high lesion activities and low systemic activities and high tumor-to-normal-tissue ratios and achieving a wide safety margin. Imaging of the actual therapeutic administration of 124I-omburtamab allows for direct estimation of the therapeutic lesion and normal-tissue-absorbed doses.