Pub Date : 2025-11-16DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.030
Nick Wilson Jones, Chris Duff
{"title":"Commentary on: Plastic surgery training in the United Kingdom and Ireland in 2025: Results of the National Training Survey.","authors":"Nick Wilson Jones, Chris Duff","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.030","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145575193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.015
Rini Vyas, Christopher Jones, Aenone Harper Machin
{"title":"Letter response to Sutcliffe et al. (\"Re: Single modality indocyanine green is feasible for sentinel node detection in head and neck cutaneous melanoma: A prospective cohort study\").","authors":"Rini Vyas, Christopher Jones, Aenone Harper Machin","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.053
Klara Profeta, Yusuf Berkay Çinar, Canberk Gürbüz, Ceyhun Uzun, Emrah Kağan Yaşar, Murat Şahin Alagöz
{"title":"Correspondence on: \"Thermal versus tactile sensory recovery following alloplastic and neurotized autologous breast reconstruction\".","authors":"Klara Profeta, Yusuf Berkay Çinar, Canberk Gürbüz, Ceyhun Uzun, Emrah Kağan Yaşar, Murat Şahin Alagöz","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-10DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.09.019
Nicole Sanchez Figueroa, Barbara Mullen, Maria Rios-Sanchez, Holly Brakke, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Vahe Fahradyan
Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is the most common genital gender-affirming surgery for transfeminine individuals. Postoperative wound care often involves either traditional bolster dressings or incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT). While iNPWT has shown potential benefits in wound healing and infection reduction, its impact on nursing workload and practical application in perineal wounds remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate nursing experiences with iNPWT compared to standard bolster dressings following PIV. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among floor nurses at a single institution with experience managing postoperative PIV patients. The survey assessed challenges encountered with each dressing method, strategies used to address complications, perceived workload, satisfaction, and observations on patient comfort. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Sixteen nurses responded (59% response rate), most with ≥3 years of transgender surgical care experience. Overall, 81% reported satisfaction with iNPWT, and 47% perceived it as less burdensome than bolster dressings. Device malfunction, primarily due to air leaks, was the most common issue (81%). However, iNPWT was associated with improved hygiene and reduced need for dressing changes. Nurses employed strategies such as enhanced sealing techniques and increased monitoring to troubleshoot challenges. Despite early technical difficulties, iNPWT was well-received by nursing staff, offering workflow advantages and increased patient comfort. Findings suggest iNPWT is a feasible alternative to bolster dressings in PIV and highlight the importance of nursing support and training for successful implementation.
{"title":"Negative pressure wound therapy vs. standard dressings in penile inversion vaginoplasty: Provider perspectives on challenges, benefits, and workload.","authors":"Nicole Sanchez Figueroa, Barbara Mullen, Maria Rios-Sanchez, Holly Brakke, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Vahe Fahradyan","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.09.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is the most common genital gender-affirming surgery for transfeminine individuals. Postoperative wound care often involves either traditional bolster dressings or incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT). While iNPWT has shown potential benefits in wound healing and infection reduction, its impact on nursing workload and practical application in perineal wounds remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate nursing experiences with iNPWT compared to standard bolster dressings following PIV. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among floor nurses at a single institution with experience managing postoperative PIV patients. The survey assessed challenges encountered with each dressing method, strategies used to address complications, perceived workload, satisfaction, and observations on patient comfort. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Sixteen nurses responded (59% response rate), most with ≥3 years of transgender surgical care experience. Overall, 81% reported satisfaction with iNPWT, and 47% perceived it as less burdensome than bolster dressings. Device malfunction, primarily due to air leaks, was the most common issue (81%). However, iNPWT was associated with improved hygiene and reduced need for dressing changes. Nurses employed strategies such as enhanced sealing techniques and increased monitoring to troubleshoot challenges. Despite early technical difficulties, iNPWT was well-received by nursing staff, offering workflow advantages and increased patient comfort. Findings suggest iNPWT is a feasible alternative to bolster dressings in PIV and highlight the importance of nursing support and training for successful implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145498140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-08DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.052
David Boccara, Kevin Serror, Olivier Mathieu, Thibaud Mernier, Marc Chaouat
{"title":"Correspondence on: Thermal versus tactile sensory recovery following alloplastic and neurotized autologous breast reconstruction.","authors":"David Boccara, Kevin Serror, Olivier Mathieu, Thibaud Mernier, Marc Chaouat","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.052","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-06DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.002
Y Harder, F Bonomi, L Guggenheim, N Peradze, C Parodi, D Schmauss, A Weinzierl, E Limido
{"title":"Response to Correspondence on: 'First experience from 200 cases with a new breast tissue expander for multi-stage pre-pectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy'.","authors":"Y Harder, F Bonomi, L Guggenheim, N Peradze, C Parodi, D Schmauss, A Weinzierl, E Limido","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145508499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.09.035
O Sharp, A R McKean, L Spence, T Nanidis
{"title":"Correspondence on: 'First experience from 200 cases with a new breast tissue expander for multi-stage pre-pectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy'.","authors":"O Sharp, A R McKean, L Spence, T Nanidis","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.09.035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.09.035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145508488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.038
Oluwakemi Ayoade, Henry Tobias de Berker, Dorothy Bbaale, Dorsi Jowi, Attiya Ijaz, Priyatma Khincha, Folake Abikoye, Adam James Reid
Most plastic surgery research originates in high-income countries (HICs). This does not reflect the distribution of need in the global population, and is underpinned by a lack of representation of authors working in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aims of this study were to explore the barriers to publishing, including access to plastic surgery journals, among plastic surgeons working in LMICs. These themes were explored through an online questionnaire distributed via the British Foundation for International Reconstructive Surgery and Training global mailing list and professional networks across LMIC (as defined by the World Health Organization). We received 188 responses from 21 countries. Although 73% felt that publishing was beneficial to career progression, 47% of the respondents had never published as a first author, and 36% had never published as a co-author. The most common barriers to publishing were patient workload (46%), lack of guidance/mentorship (38%), and article publishing charges (35%). With regards to access to plastic surgery journals, 50% found it challenging to access this resource and cited paywalls (84%), inadequate library access (70%), and poor knowledge of resources (20%) as the most common barriers. Furthermore, 94% believed that making plastic surgery journals more accessible would increase research productivity. Common impacts of poor access to journals were difficulty staying up to date (65%), finding specific techniques (52%), and accessing references/research resources (43%). We concluded that a range of interventions is required to support plastic surgery research in LMICs. These include improving access to surgical journals, research skills, mentorship, task sharing, and removing article publishing charges.
{"title":"Impact of limited access to plastic surgery journals on clinical and research output in low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Oluwakemi Ayoade, Henry Tobias de Berker, Dorothy Bbaale, Dorsi Jowi, Attiya Ijaz, Priyatma Khincha, Folake Abikoye, Adam James Reid","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most plastic surgery research originates in high-income countries (HICs). This does not reflect the distribution of need in the global population, and is underpinned by a lack of representation of authors working in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aims of this study were to explore the barriers to publishing, including access to plastic surgery journals, among plastic surgeons working in LMICs. These themes were explored through an online questionnaire distributed via the British Foundation for International Reconstructive Surgery and Training global mailing list and professional networks across LMIC (as defined by the World Health Organization). We received 188 responses from 21 countries. Although 73% felt that publishing was beneficial to career progression, 47% of the respondents had never published as a first author, and 36% had never published as a co-author. The most common barriers to publishing were patient workload (46%), lack of guidance/mentorship (38%), and article publishing charges (35%). With regards to access to plastic surgery journals, 50% found it challenging to access this resource and cited paywalls (84%), inadequate library access (70%), and poor knowledge of resources (20%) as the most common barriers. Furthermore, 94% believed that making plastic surgery journals more accessible would increase research productivity. Common impacts of poor access to journals were difficulty staying up to date (65%), finding specific techniques (52%), and accessing references/research resources (43%). We concluded that a range of interventions is required to support plastic surgery research in LMICs. These include improving access to surgical journals, research skills, mentorship, task sharing, and removing article publishing charges.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145608170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.015
Milomir Ninkovic, John M Felder, Zvezdana Milačak, Marina Ninkovic, Emmanuel Nageeb
Thumb opposition is an essential component of human hand function, and loss of the thenar musculature creates substantial disability of the hand. Additionally, first web space contracture as a result of trauma is a substantial limitation in reconstruction of thumb opposition. Reconstruction of thenar function is most commonly performed via opponensplasty tendon transfers. Although beneficial, tendon transfers require cortical retraining and fall short of native function. These may be the only option in the case of median nerve palsy. However, at times, thenar function is lost owing to thenar muscle injury with preserved median nerve function. Common examples include palmar soft tissue trauma and compartment syndrome. In such cases, intuitive thumb opposition can be restored with free functional muscle transfer innervated by the thenar motor branch of the median nerve. In addition, first web space release can be achieved in the same procedure. Here, we have demonstrate the benefits of this procedure versus opponensplasty, review long-term outcomes of successful cases including videographic documentation of function, and provide expert guidance to surgeons considering performing this procedure.
{"title":"Free functional gracilis muscle opponensplasty for thenar reconstruction: Indications, technique, and long-term outcomes.","authors":"Milomir Ninkovic, John M Felder, Zvezdana Milačak, Marina Ninkovic, Emmanuel Nageeb","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thumb opposition is an essential component of human hand function, and loss of the thenar musculature creates substantial disability of the hand. Additionally, first web space contracture as a result of trauma is a substantial limitation in reconstruction of thumb opposition. Reconstruction of thenar function is most commonly performed via opponensplasty tendon transfers. Although beneficial, tendon transfers require cortical retraining and fall short of native function. These may be the only option in the case of median nerve palsy. However, at times, thenar function is lost owing to thenar muscle injury with preserved median nerve function. Common examples include palmar soft tissue trauma and compartment syndrome. In such cases, intuitive thumb opposition can be restored with free functional muscle transfer innervated by the thenar motor branch of the median nerve. In addition, first web space release can be achieved in the same procedure. Here, we have demonstrate the benefits of this procedure versus opponensplasty, review long-term outcomes of successful cases including videographic documentation of function, and provide expert guidance to surgeons considering performing this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145575186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-15DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.010
Tobias Niederegger, Thomas Schaschinger, Emre Karakas, Mauz Ashgar, Leonard Knoedler, Felix Klimitz, Martin Kauke-Navarro, Samuel Knoedler, Jule Brandt, Alen Palackic, Alexandre G Lellouch, Adriana C Panayi, Gabriel Hundeshagen
Facial burns pose complex challenges for survivors, encompassing significant physical, psychological, and social burdens. This systematic review aimed to identify the key factors influencing the stigma, social integration, and psychological wellbeing of individuals with facial burns. A comprehensive search was conducted across three major databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Studies that examined the psychosocial impact of facial burns, including stigmatisation and interventions for recovery, were included. Twenty-two studies with a combined total of 1927 participants, published between 1976 and 2024, met the eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with an average score of 5.8, indicating moderate quality. Results demonstrated that visible scarring, functional impairments, and low socioeconomic status were associated with more severe stigma and greater psychological distress. Children, women, and individuals with financial insecurities were particularly vulnerable to negative psychosocial outcomes. Interventions such as psychological counselling, resilience training, and reconstructive surgery were shown to improve social reintegration and reduce stigma. Community education and structured reintegration programmes played an essential role in supporting recovery. Despite these advances, addressing the stigma associated with facial burns remains challenging. A multidisciplinary approach combining medical, psychological, and community-based interventions is crucial to improving outcomes. Standardised stigma assessment tools should be implemented to identify patients at risk and provide early support. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term psychological trajectories and the effectiveness of stigma-reduction strategies to optimise recovery and quality of life for survivors of facial burns.
面部烧伤给幸存者带来了复杂的挑战,包括重大的身体、心理和社会负担。本系统综述旨在确定影响面部烧伤患者的耻辱感、社会融合和心理健康的关键因素。在三个主要数据库中进行了全面的搜索:PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science。研究包括面部烧伤的社会心理影响,包括污名化和康复干预措施。在1976年至2024年间发表的22项研究,总共有1927名参与者,符合资格标准。方法质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估,平均得分为5.8分,表明质量中等。结果表明,可见的疤痕、功能障碍和低社会经济地位与更严重的耻辱感和更大的心理困扰有关。儿童、妇女和有经济不安全感的个人尤其容易受到负面心理社会后果的影响。心理咨询、恢复力训练和重建手术等干预措施已被证明可以改善重返社会和减少耻辱感。社区教育和有组织的重返社会方案在支持恢复方面发挥了重要作用。尽管取得了这些进展,但解决与面部烧伤相关的耻辱感仍然具有挑战性。结合医学、心理和社区干预的多学科方法对改善结果至关重要。应实施标准化污名化评估工具,以识别有风险的患者并提供早期支持。需要进一步的研究来评估长期的心理轨迹和减少耻辱感策略的有效性,以优化面部烧伤幸存者的恢复和生活质量。
{"title":"Psychological impact and stigma after facial burns: A systematic review.","authors":"Tobias Niederegger, Thomas Schaschinger, Emre Karakas, Mauz Ashgar, Leonard Knoedler, Felix Klimitz, Martin Kauke-Navarro, Samuel Knoedler, Jule Brandt, Alen Palackic, Alexandre G Lellouch, Adriana C Panayi, Gabriel Hundeshagen","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.10.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Facial burns pose complex challenges for survivors, encompassing significant physical, psychological, and social burdens. This systematic review aimed to identify the key factors influencing the stigma, social integration, and psychological wellbeing of individuals with facial burns. A comprehensive search was conducted across three major databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Studies that examined the psychosocial impact of facial burns, including stigmatisation and interventions for recovery, were included. Twenty-two studies with a combined total of 1927 participants, published between 1976 and 2024, met the eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with an average score of 5.8, indicating moderate quality. Results demonstrated that visible scarring, functional impairments, and low socioeconomic status were associated with more severe stigma and greater psychological distress. Children, women, and individuals with financial insecurities were particularly vulnerable to negative psychosocial outcomes. Interventions such as psychological counselling, resilience training, and reconstructive surgery were shown to improve social reintegration and reduce stigma. Community education and structured reintegration programmes played an essential role in supporting recovery. Despite these advances, addressing the stigma associated with facial burns remains challenging. A multidisciplinary approach combining medical, psychological, and community-based interventions is crucial to improving outcomes. Standardised stigma assessment tools should be implemented to identify patients at risk and provide early support. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term psychological trajectories and the effectiveness of stigma-reduction strategies to optimise recovery and quality of life for survivors of facial burns.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145396071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}