首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society最新文献

英文 中文
Longitudinal analysis of Annual Wellness Visit use among Medicare enrollees: Provider, enrollee, and clinic factors. 对医疗保险参保者使用年度健康门诊的纵向分析:医疗服务提供者、参保者和诊所因素。
Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19263
Jennifer L Gabbard, Ellis Beurle, Zhang Zhang, Erica L Frechman, Kristin Lenoir, Emilie Duchesneau, Michelle M Mielke, Amresh D Hanchate

Background: The utilization of Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs), preventive healthcare visits covered by Medicare Part B, has grown steadily since their inception in 2011. However, longitudinal patterns and variations in use across enrollees, providers, and clinics remain poorly understood.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze AWV usage trends from 2018 to 2022 among a sizable cohort of Medicare beneficiaries, employing electronic health record (EHR) data. The goal was to assess AWV frequency and explore variations across enrollees, providers, and clinics.

Design: This retrospective observational study utilized EHR data from Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and above, receiving continuous primary care from 2018 to 2022 (N = 24,549). Enrollees were classified into three categories based on their AWV utilization over a 5-year period: low users (0-1 AWVs), moderate users (2-3 AWVs), and regular users (4-5 AWVs). AWV usage patterns were examined across individual demographics and provider/clinic characteristics using multilevel regression models.

Key results: Over the 2018-2022 period, 58.6% were regular AWV users, 27.7% were moderate users, and 13.7% were low users. Differences in primary care providers and clinics accounted for 56.4% (95% CI, 45.3%-66.9%) of the variation between low and regular users. Among enrollees who visited the same providers and clinics, individuals were less likely to be regular users of AWVs if they were 85 and older, Hispanic, from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, or had multiple comorbidities.

Conclusions: The majority of Medicare beneficiaries in the study engaged with AWVs, with 86% having two or more over the 5-year period. These findings underscore the broad acceptance of AWVs among beneficiaries but also show that clinic and provider factors influence usage, especially among older, minoritized, and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Interventions at the provider and clinic levels are necessary to further improve AWV uptake, particularly for vulnerable groups.

背景:年度健康门诊(AWVs)是医疗保险 B 部分承保的预防性保健门诊,自 2011 年推出以来,其使用率稳步增长。然而,人们对参保者、医疗服务提供者和诊所之间的纵向使用模式和差异仍知之甚少:本研究旨在利用电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据,分析 2018 年至 2022 年期间相当规模的医疗保险受益人群体中 AWV 的使用趋势。目标是评估 AWV 使用频率,并探索参保者、医疗服务提供者和诊所之间的差异:这项回顾性观察研究利用了 2018 年至 2022 年期间接受持续初级保健的 66 岁及以上医疗保险受益人的电子病历数据(N = 24,549)。根据参保者在 5 年内的 AWV 使用情况将其分为三类:低度使用者(0-1 次 AWV)、中度使用者(2-3 次 AWV)和经常使用者(4-5 次 AWV)。使用多层次回归模型对个人人口统计学特征和医疗服务提供者/诊所特征的 AWV 使用模式进行了研究:在 2018-2022 年期间,58.6% 的人经常使用 AWV,27.7% 的人中度使用,13.7% 的人低度使用。初级保健提供者和诊所的差异占低度使用者和定期使用者之间差异的 56.4%(95% CI,45.3%-66.9%)。在就诊于同一医疗机构和诊所的参保者中,如果年龄在 85 岁及以上、西班牙裔、来自社会经济条件较差的地区或患有多种并发症,则不太可能经常使用 AWV:本研究中的大多数医疗保险受益人都使用过自动售票机,其中 86% 的受益人在 5 年内使用过两次或两次以上自动售票机。这些研究结果表明,受益人广泛接受了AWV,但同时也表明,诊所和医疗服务提供者的因素会影响AWV的使用,尤其是在老年人、少数民族和社会经济条件较差的人群中。有必要在医疗服务提供者和诊所层面采取干预措施,以进一步提高预警系统的使用率,尤其是弱势群体的使用率。
{"title":"Longitudinal analysis of Annual Wellness Visit use among Medicare enrollees: Provider, enrollee, and clinic factors.","authors":"Jennifer L Gabbard, Ellis Beurle, Zhang Zhang, Erica L Frechman, Kristin Lenoir, Emilie Duchesneau, Michelle M Mielke, Amresh D Hanchate","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs), preventive healthcare visits covered by Medicare Part B, has grown steadily since their inception in 2011. However, longitudinal patterns and variations in use across enrollees, providers, and clinics remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze AWV usage trends from 2018 to 2022 among a sizable cohort of Medicare beneficiaries, employing electronic health record (EHR) data. The goal was to assess AWV frequency and explore variations across enrollees, providers, and clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This retrospective observational study utilized EHR data from Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and above, receiving continuous primary care from 2018 to 2022 (N = 24,549). Enrollees were classified into three categories based on their AWV utilization over a 5-year period: low users (0-1 AWVs), moderate users (2-3 AWVs), and regular users (4-5 AWVs). AWV usage patterns were examined across individual demographics and provider/clinic characteristics using multilevel regression models.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Over the 2018-2022 period, 58.6% were regular AWV users, 27.7% were moderate users, and 13.7% were low users. Differences in primary care providers and clinics accounted for 56.4% (95% CI, 45.3%-66.9%) of the variation between low and regular users. Among enrollees who visited the same providers and clinics, individuals were less likely to be regular users of AWVs if they were 85 and older, Hispanic, from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, or had multiple comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of Medicare beneficiaries in the study engaged with AWVs, with 86% having two or more over the 5-year period. These findings underscore the broad acceptance of AWVs among beneficiaries but also show that clinic and provider factors influence usage, especially among older, minoritized, and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Interventions at the provider and clinic levels are necessary to further improve AWV uptake, particularly for vulnerable groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142718002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deprescribing considerations for central nervous system-active polypharmacy in patients with dementia. 痴呆症患者中枢神经系统活性多药的去处方考虑因素。
Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19294
Anna Hung, Matthew E Growdon
{"title":"Deprescribing considerations for central nervous system-active polypharmacy in patients with dementia.","authors":"Anna Hung, Matthew E Growdon","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19294","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19294","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142735361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frailty integration in medical specialties: Current evidence and suggested strategies from the Clin-STAR frailty interest group. 医学专科中的虚弱整合:来自 Clin-STAR 脆弱性兴趣小组的当前证据和建议策略。
Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19268
Namrata Singh, Adam S Faye, Maheen Z Abidi, Shakira J Grant, Clark DuMontier, Anand S Iyer, Nelia Jain, Bharati Kochar, Sarah B Lieber, Rachel Litke, Julia V Loewenthal, Mary Clare Masters, Michael G Nanna, Raele Donetha Robison, Sebastian E Sattui, Anoop Sheshadri, Sandra M Shi, Andrea N Sherman, Jeremy D Walston, Katherine D Wysham, Ariela R Orkaby

Frailty is a syndrome that can inform clinical treatments and interventions for older adults. Although implementation of frailty across medical subspecialties has the potential to improve care for the aging population, its uptake has been heterogenous. While frailty assessment is highly integrated into certain medical subspecialties, other subspecialties have only recently begun to consider frailty in the context of patient care. In order to advance the field of frailty-informed care, we aim to detail what is known about frailty within the subspecialties of internal medicine. In doing so, we highlight cross-disciplinary approaches that can enhance our understanding of frailty, focusing on ways to improve the implementation of frailty measures, as well as develop potential interventional strategies to mitigate frailty within these subspecialties. This has important implications for the clinical care of the aging population and can help guide future research.

虚弱是一种综合征,可为老年人的临床治疗和干预提供依据。虽然在各医学亚专科中实施虚弱综合征有可能改善对老龄人口的护理,但对它的接受程度却参差不齐。虽然虚弱评估已高度融入某些医学亚专科,但其他亚专科直到最近才开始在病人护理中考虑虚弱问题。为了推动虚弱知情护理领域的发展,我们旨在详细介绍内科各亚专科对虚弱的认识。在此过程中,我们将重点介绍可提高我们对虚弱的认识的跨学科方法,重点关注如何改进虚弱措施的实施,以及在这些亚专科内制定潜在的干预策略以减轻虚弱。这对老龄人口的临床护理具有重要意义,并有助于指导未来的研究。
{"title":"Frailty integration in medical specialties: Current evidence and suggested strategies from the Clin-STAR frailty interest group.","authors":"Namrata Singh, Adam S Faye, Maheen Z Abidi, Shakira J Grant, Clark DuMontier, Anand S Iyer, Nelia Jain, Bharati Kochar, Sarah B Lieber, Rachel Litke, Julia V Loewenthal, Mary Clare Masters, Michael G Nanna, Raele Donetha Robison, Sebastian E Sattui, Anoop Sheshadri, Sandra M Shi, Andrea N Sherman, Jeremy D Walston, Katherine D Wysham, Ariela R Orkaby","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19268","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jgs.19268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frailty is a syndrome that can inform clinical treatments and interventions for older adults. Although implementation of frailty across medical subspecialties has the potential to improve care for the aging population, its uptake has been heterogenous. While frailty assessment is highly integrated into certain medical subspecialties, other subspecialties have only recently begun to consider frailty in the context of patient care. In order to advance the field of frailty-informed care, we aim to detail what is known about frailty within the subspecialties of internal medicine. In doing so, we highlight cross-disciplinary approaches that can enhance our understanding of frailty, focusing on ways to improve the implementation of frailty measures, as well as develop potential interventional strategies to mitigate frailty within these subspecialties. This has important implications for the clinical care of the aging population and can help guide future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142712331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characterizing patient portal use of people with cognitive impairment and potentially inappropriate medications. 了解认知障碍患者门户网站的使用特点以及潜在的用药不当。
Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19284
Ariel R Green, Daniel Martin, Andrew Jessen, Mingche M J Wu, Andrea E Daddato, Rosalphie Quiles Rosado, Kelly T Gleason, Aleksandra Wec, Jennifer L Wolff, Casey O Taylor, Elizabeth A Bayliss

Background: People with cognitive impairment commonly use central nervous system-active potentially inappropriate medications (CNS-PIM), increasing risk of adverse outcomes. Patient portals may be a promising tool for facilitating medication-related conversations. Little is known about portal use by this population related to medications.

Objective: To target portal interventions, we sought to identify individuals with cognitive impairment and CNS-PIM exposure who discussed medications through the portal and to determine how frequently their messages described possible adverse effects.

Methods: We used electronic health record (EHR) data from an academic health system in Maryland (Site 1) from 2017 to 2022 and pharmacy and EHR data from an integrated health system in Colorado (Site 2) in 2022 to identify people with cognitive impairment and CNS-PIM exposure who communicated about medications through the portal. At Site 1, message threads were manually categorized based on content. At Site 2, messages were categorized using natural language processing (NLP).

Results: The Site 1 cohort included 5543 patients aged ≥65 with cognitive impairment and ≥2 outpatient visits from 2017 to 2022. Over half (n = 3072; 55%) had CNS-PIM prescriptions. Most with CNS-PIM prescriptions had portal use (n = 1987; 65%); 1320 (66%) of those patients sent messages during possible CNS-PIM exposure. Coding of a 5% random sample of message threads revealed that 3% mentioned CNS-PIM and possible adverse effects, while 8% mentioned possible adverse effects without referencing CNS-PIM. At Site 2, 4270 people had cognitive impairment and CNS-PIM exposure in 2022; of these, 1984 (46%) had portal use and 1768 (41%) sent medication-related messages during CNS-PIM exposure. NLP identified 663 (8%) messages that mentioned CNS-PIM and possible adverse effects, while 726 (41%) mentioned possible adverse effects without referencing CNS-PIM.

Conclusions: People with cognitive impairment and care partners frequently send portal messages about medications and possible adverse effects. Identifying such messages can help target deprescribing interventions.

背景:认知障碍患者通常使用中枢神经系统活性药物(CNS-PIM),这增加了不良后果的风险。患者门户网站可能是促进用药相关对话的有效工具。但人们对这一人群使用门户网站进行药物治疗的情况知之甚少:为了有针对性地采取门户网站干预措施,我们试图找出那些通过门户网站讨论药物的认知障碍患者和 CNS-PIM 暴露者,并确定他们在信息中描述可能的不良反应的频率:我们使用了马里兰州一家学术医疗系统(站点 1)2017 年至 2022 年的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,以及科罗拉多州一家综合医疗系统(站点 2)2022 年的药房和 EHR 数据,以识别通过门户网站交流药物的认知障碍患者和 CNS-PIM 暴露者。在站点 1,根据内容对消息线程进行人工分类。在网站 2,使用自然语言处理(NLP)对信息进行分类:网站 1 的队列包括 5543 名年龄≥65 岁、有认知障碍且在 2017 年至 2022 年期间门诊就诊次数≥2 次的患者。半数以上(n = 3072;55%)开具了 CNS-PIM 处方。大多数具有 CNS-PIM 处方的患者使用过门户网站(n = 1987;65%);其中 1320 名(66%)患者在可能接触 CNS-PIM 期间发送了信息。对 5% 的随机信息样本进行编码后发现,3% 的信息提及 CNS-PIM 和可能的不良反应,8% 的信息提及可能的不良反应,但未提及 CNS-PIM。在站点 2,有 4270 人在 2022 年出现认知障碍并接触过 CNS-PIM;其中,1984 人(46%)使用过门户网站,1768 人(41%)在接触 CNS-PIM 期间发送过与药物相关的信息。NLP发现663条(8%)信息提到了CNS-PIM和可能的不良反应,726条(41%)信息提到了可能的不良反应,但没有提到CNS-PIM:结论:认知障碍患者和护理伙伴经常通过门户网站发送有关药物和可能不良反应的信息。识别这些信息有助于有针对性地采取处方干预措施。
{"title":"Characterizing patient portal use of people with cognitive impairment and potentially inappropriate medications.","authors":"Ariel R Green, Daniel Martin, Andrew Jessen, Mingche M J Wu, Andrea E Daddato, Rosalphie Quiles Rosado, Kelly T Gleason, Aleksandra Wec, Jennifer L Wolff, Casey O Taylor, Elizabeth A Bayliss","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19284","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with cognitive impairment commonly use central nervous system-active potentially inappropriate medications (CNS-PIM), increasing risk of adverse outcomes. Patient portals may be a promising tool for facilitating medication-related conversations. Little is known about portal use by this population related to medications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To target portal interventions, we sought to identify individuals with cognitive impairment and CNS-PIM exposure who discussed medications through the portal and to determine how frequently their messages described possible adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used electronic health record (EHR) data from an academic health system in Maryland (Site 1) from 2017 to 2022 and pharmacy and EHR data from an integrated health system in Colorado (Site 2) in 2022 to identify people with cognitive impairment and CNS-PIM exposure who communicated about medications through the portal. At Site 1, message threads were manually categorized based on content. At Site 2, messages were categorized using natural language processing (NLP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Site 1 cohort included 5543 patients aged ≥65 with cognitive impairment and ≥2 outpatient visits from 2017 to 2022. Over half (n = 3072; 55%) had CNS-PIM prescriptions. Most with CNS-PIM prescriptions had portal use (n = 1987; 65%); 1320 (66%) of those patients sent messages during possible CNS-PIM exposure. Coding of a 5% random sample of message threads revealed that 3% mentioned CNS-PIM and possible adverse effects, while 8% mentioned possible adverse effects without referencing CNS-PIM. At Site 2, 4270 people had cognitive impairment and CNS-PIM exposure in 2022; of these, 1984 (46%) had portal use and 1768 (41%) sent medication-related messages during CNS-PIM exposure. NLP identified 663 (8%) messages that mentioned CNS-PIM and possible adverse effects, while 726 (41%) mentioned possible adverse effects without referencing CNS-PIM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with cognitive impairment and care partners frequently send portal messages about medications and possible adverse effects. Identifying such messages can help target deprescribing interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142694032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in leisure activity, all-cause mortality, and functional disability in older Japanese adults: The JAGES cohort study. 日本老年人休闲活动、全因死亡率和功能性残疾的变化:JAGES 队列研究。
Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19264
Sayo Masuko, Yusuke Matsuyama, Shiho Kino, Katsunori Kondo, Jun Aida

Background/objectives: Leisure activities provide various health benefits for older adults. However, few studies have examined changes in leisure activities and health. This study aimed to determine the association among changes in leisure activities, subsequent all-cause mortality, and functional disability.

Methods: Using a longitudinal, prospective cohort design, we analyzed data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) in 2010 and 2013 merged with government data on death and long-term care needs by 2020. Changes in leisure activity were defined as four-category exposure based on a question about leisure activities: those with leisure activities in both 2010 and 2013, those who started leisure activities in 2013, those without leisure activities in both 2010 and 2013 (reference group), and those who stopped leisure activities in 2013. All-cause mortality and functional disability were defined as onset during the 6-year follow-up from the 2013 survey. We applied the inverse probability of censoring and treatment-weighted methods for analyses using Cox proportional hazards models, where missingness was addressed using multiple imputation.

Results: The study included 38,125 participants with a mean age of 72.8 ± 5.5 years at baseline, and 46.9% were male. Among those without leisure activities between 2010 and 2013 and those who started leisure activities in 2013, mortality rates by 2020 were 28.6% and 21.1%, and functional disability rates were 24.6% and 18.1%, respectively; and in analyses with the inverse probability of censoring and treatment-weighted methods, the hazard ratio for mortality was 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.90) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-1.01) for functional disability, respectively.

Conclusion: Initiation of leisure activities among the older adults was associated with a lower risk of mortality and functional disability over the subsequent 6 years compared to older adults who did not report initiating any leisure activities.

背景/目的:休闲活动对老年人的健康有各种益处。然而,很少有研究探讨休闲活动的变化与健康之间的关系。本研究旨在确定休闲活动的变化、随后的全因死亡率和功能性残疾之间的关联:我们采用纵向、前瞻性队列设计,分析了日本老年学评估研究(JAGES)2010 年和 2013 年的数据,并将这些数据与政府提供的 2020 年死亡和长期护理需求数据进行了合并。休闲活动的变化被定义为基于休闲活动问题的四类暴露:2010 年和 2013 年均有休闲活动者、2013 年开始休闲活动者、2010 年和 2013 年均无休闲活动者(参照组)以及 2013 年停止休闲活动者。全因死亡率和功能性残疾的定义是在 2013 年调查后的 6 年随访期间发病。我们采用逆概率删减法和治疗加权法,使用 Cox 比例危险模型进行分析,并使用多重估算法解决缺失问题:研究共纳入 38 125 名参与者,基线平均年龄为 72.8 ± 5.5 岁,46.9% 为男性。在2010年至2013年期间没有参加休闲活动的人和2013年开始参加休闲活动的人中,到2020年的死亡率分别为28.6%和21.1%,功能性残疾率分别为24.6%和18.1%;在采用逆概率删减法和治疗加权法进行的分析中,死亡率的危险比分别为0.82(95%置信区间(CI),0.75-0.90),功能性残疾的危险比分别为0.89(95% CI,0.79-1.01):结论:与未报告开始休闲活动的老年人相比,开始休闲活动的老年人在随后的 6 年中死亡和功能性残疾的风险较低。
{"title":"Changes in leisure activity, all-cause mortality, and functional disability in older Japanese adults: The JAGES cohort study.","authors":"Sayo Masuko, Yusuke Matsuyama, Shiho Kino, Katsunori Kondo, Jun Aida","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19264","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Leisure activities provide various health benefits for older adults. However, few studies have examined changes in leisure activities and health. This study aimed to determine the association among changes in leisure activities, subsequent all-cause mortality, and functional disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a longitudinal, prospective cohort design, we analyzed data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) in 2010 and 2013 merged with government data on death and long-term care needs by 2020. Changes in leisure activity were defined as four-category exposure based on a question about leisure activities: those with leisure activities in both 2010 and 2013, those who started leisure activities in 2013, those without leisure activities in both 2010 and 2013 (reference group), and those who stopped leisure activities in 2013. All-cause mortality and functional disability were defined as onset during the 6-year follow-up from the 2013 survey. We applied the inverse probability of censoring and treatment-weighted methods for analyses using Cox proportional hazards models, where missingness was addressed using multiple imputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 38,125 participants with a mean age of 72.8 ± 5.5 years at baseline, and 46.9% were male. Among those without leisure activities between 2010 and 2013 and those who started leisure activities in 2013, mortality rates by 2020 were 28.6% and 21.1%, and functional disability rates were 24.6% and 18.1%, respectively; and in analyses with the inverse probability of censoring and treatment-weighted methods, the hazard ratio for mortality was 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.90) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-1.01) for functional disability, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initiation of leisure activities among the older adults was associated with a lower risk of mortality and functional disability over the subsequent 6 years compared to older adults who did not report initiating any leisure activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142694024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moving beyond tokenism: Sustaining engagement of persons living with dementia in identifying emergency research priorities. 超越形式主义:让痴呆症患者持续参与确定紧急研究重点。
Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19269
Jacqueline Sandoval, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Christopher R Carpenter, Manish N Shah, Jeffrey Dussetschleger, Scott Dresden, Michael Ellenbogen, Heidi Gil, Naveena Jaspal, Deborah Jobe, Allan Vann, Teresa Webb, Ula Hwang

Introduction: The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network 2.0-Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0-ADC) aims to advance research efforts to improve the emergency care of persons living with dementia (PLWDs).

Objective: To support this objective, GEAR 2.0-ADC convened a virtual consensus conference to prioritize emergency care research opportunities for PLWDs inclusive of perspectives of PLWDs to ensure identification of research gaps in response to their experiences and priorities. Inclusion of PLWDs as research partners is increasingly recognized as a best practice, however, approaches to facilitating consensus participation are lacking.

Methods: Best practices for supporting the engagement of PLWDs in a consensus conference, applied across its three phases (pre-conference, during the conference, and post-conference), include: establishing a learning environment focused on research priorities before the event, presenting information in ways that align with participants' learning preferences while accommodating cognitive impairments, and providing multiple opportunities and methods for gathering post-conference feedback from PLWDs.

Results: These strategies were identified by PLWDs and care partners (CPs) through semi-structured interviews, who were involved in the convening process, aimed at exploring ways to enhance facilitation techniques for participants.

Conclusion: Additionally, these summarized insights aim to encourage the use of community-engaged approaches in discussions and consensus-building around research priorities in emergency care, particularly for PLWDs and their CPs.

导言:老年急救护理应用研究网络 2.0--推进痴呆症护理(GEAR 2.0-ADC)旨在推进研究工作,改善痴呆症患者(PLWDs)的急救护理:为支持这一目标,GEAR 2.0-ADC 召开了一次虚拟共识会议,以优先考虑针对痴呆症患者的紧急护理研究机会,其中包括痴呆症患者的观点,以确保根据他们的经验和优先事项确定研究缺口。将 PLWDs 纳入研究合作伙伴越来越被认为是一种最佳实践,然而,目前还缺乏促进共识参与的方法:在共识会议的三个阶段(会前、会中和会后),支持 PLWDs 参与会议的最佳实践包括:在会前建立一个以研究重点为中心的学习环境,以符合与会者学习偏好的方式展示信息,同时照顾到认知障碍,以及提供多种机会和方法收集 PLWDs 的会后反馈:这些策略是由参与召集过程的 PLWDs 和护理伙伴(CPs)通过半结构式访谈确定的,旨在探索如何提高为参与者提供便利的技巧:此外,这些总结的见解旨在鼓励在讨论中使用社区参与的方法,并围绕紧急护理中的研究重点达成共识,特别是针对 PLWDs 及其 CPs。
{"title":"Moving beyond tokenism: Sustaining engagement of persons living with dementia in identifying emergency research priorities.","authors":"Jacqueline Sandoval, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Christopher R Carpenter, Manish N Shah, Jeffrey Dussetschleger, Scott Dresden, Michael Ellenbogen, Heidi Gil, Naveena Jaspal, Deborah Jobe, Allan Vann, Teresa Webb, Ula Hwang","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network 2.0-Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0-ADC) aims to advance research efforts to improve the emergency care of persons living with dementia (PLWDs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To support this objective, GEAR 2.0-ADC convened a virtual consensus conference to prioritize emergency care research opportunities for PLWDs inclusive of perspectives of PLWDs to ensure identification of research gaps in response to their experiences and priorities. Inclusion of PLWDs as research partners is increasingly recognized as a best practice, however, approaches to facilitating consensus participation are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Best practices for supporting the engagement of PLWDs in a consensus conference, applied across its three phases (pre-conference, during the conference, and post-conference), include: establishing a learning environment focused on research priorities before the event, presenting information in ways that align with participants' learning preferences while accommodating cognitive impairments, and providing multiple opportunities and methods for gathering post-conference feedback from PLWDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These strategies were identified by PLWDs and care partners (CPs) through semi-structured interviews, who were involved in the convening process, aimed at exploring ways to enhance facilitation techniques for participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additionally, these summarized insights aim to encourage the use of community-engaged approaches in discussions and consensus-building around research priorities in emergency care, particularly for PLWDs and their CPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142690154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barriers and enablers of deprescribing in older adults: Trainee's perspectives. 老年人取消处方的障碍和促进因素:受训人员的观点。
Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19281
S Nachammai Vidhya, Reshma Aziz Merchant
{"title":"Barriers and enablers of deprescribing in older adults: Trainee's perspectives.","authors":"S Nachammai Vidhya, Reshma Aziz Merchant","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19281","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142690153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shared decision-making about autologous stem cell transplantation: A qualitative study of older patients and physicians. 自体干细胞移植的共同决策:一项针对老年患者和医生的定性研究。
Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19276
Qian Liu, Jianfang Li, Lixiu Wang, Chuyue Shan, Li Wang, Dan Ye, Dan Luo, Huijing Zou, Bing Xiang Yang, Xiao Qin Wang, Jingjing Zhang, Fuling Zhou

Background: The decision-making process between autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (autoHSCT) and less-intensive treatments necessitates shared decision-making between older patients with hematological malignancies and healthcare providers. However, there is limited knowledge from both perspectives. This qualitative study aimed to comprehensively understand the experiences of shared decision-making regarding autoHSCT among older patients with hematological malignancies and physicians.

Methods: Older patients and physicians were recruited from the hematology department at one of the affiliated general hospitals of Wuhan University. They participated in semi-structured, in-depth face-to-face individual interviews from August 2022 to March 2023. The interviews explored their experiences with shared decision-making about autoHSCT. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method.

Results: Thirteen older patients and eight physicians were recruited. Two themes were identified: (1) Factors influencing AutoHSCT recommendations and decision-making: Seven factors were categorized into three groups: physician-driven factors (pretransplant assessments, experience-based judgment, and communication approaches), patient-driven factors (perceived benefits and risks, financial challenges, and family involvement), and mutual trust between patients and physicians, which is a bidirectional factor relying on both physicians' trust and the active participation of patients in the decision-making process. (2) Treatment planning and outcome expectations: Regardless of treatment choices, patients focused on engaging in self-management and prioritizing quality of life, and maintaining hope for positive outcomes.

Conclusions: The shared decision-making process for autoHSCT between older patients with hematological malignancies and physicians is shaped by physician-driven factors, patient-driven factors, and mutual trust. These findings provide a foundation for developing patient-centered care strategies, including decision aids and enhanced communication training for physicians, aimed at improving outcomes for older patients facing complex treatment choices. Future research should explore how these factors interact over time, through longitudinal studies, to assess their long-term impact on patient outcomes and quality of life.

背景:在自体造血干细胞移植(autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant,autoHSCT)和低强度治疗之间的决策过程,需要老年血液恶性肿瘤患者和医疗服务提供者共同决策。然而,从这两个角度获得的知识都很有限。这项定性研究旨在全面了解老年血液恶性肿瘤患者和医生在共同决策自体HSCT方面的经验:方法:从武汉大学附属某综合医院血液科招募老年患者和医生。他们在 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 3 月期间参加了半结构化、面对面的深入访谈。访谈探讨了他们对自体肝细胞移植共同决策的经验。访谈内容逐字记录,并采用科莱兹现象学方法进行分析:共招募了 13 名老年患者和 8 名医生。确定了两个主题:(1) 影响 AutoHSCT 建议和决策的因素:七个因素被分为三组:医生驱动因素(移植前评估、基于经验的判断和沟通方法)、患者驱动因素(感知到的益处和风险、经济挑战和家庭参与)以及患者和医生之间的相互信任,这是一个双向因素,既依赖于医生的信任,也依赖于患者在决策过程中的积极参与。(2) 治疗计划和结果预期:无论选择哪种治疗方法,患者都注重参与自我管理和优先考虑生活质量,并对积极的治疗结果保持希望:老年血液恶性肿瘤患者与医生之间的自体血细胞移植共同决策过程受医生驱动因素、患者驱动因素和相互信任的影响。这些发现为制定以患者为中心的护理策略奠定了基础,包括决策辅助工具和加强医生沟通培训,旨在改善面临复杂治疗选择的老年患者的治疗效果。未来的研究应通过纵向研究探讨这些因素如何随着时间的推移而相互作用,以评估它们对患者治疗效果和生活质量的长期影响。
{"title":"Shared decision-making about autologous stem cell transplantation: A qualitative study of older patients and physicians.","authors":"Qian Liu, Jianfang Li, Lixiu Wang, Chuyue Shan, Li Wang, Dan Ye, Dan Luo, Huijing Zou, Bing Xiang Yang, Xiao Qin Wang, Jingjing Zhang, Fuling Zhou","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The decision-making process between autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (autoHSCT) and less-intensive treatments necessitates shared decision-making between older patients with hematological malignancies and healthcare providers. However, there is limited knowledge from both perspectives. This qualitative study aimed to comprehensively understand the experiences of shared decision-making regarding autoHSCT among older patients with hematological malignancies and physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older patients and physicians were recruited from the hematology department at one of the affiliated general hospitals of Wuhan University. They participated in semi-structured, in-depth face-to-face individual interviews from August 2022 to March 2023. The interviews explored their experiences with shared decision-making about autoHSCT. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen older patients and eight physicians were recruited. Two themes were identified: (1) Factors influencing AutoHSCT recommendations and decision-making: Seven factors were categorized into three groups: physician-driven factors (pretransplant assessments, experience-based judgment, and communication approaches), patient-driven factors (perceived benefits and risks, financial challenges, and family involvement), and mutual trust between patients and physicians, which is a bidirectional factor relying on both physicians' trust and the active participation of patients in the decision-making process. (2) Treatment planning and outcome expectations: Regardless of treatment choices, patients focused on engaging in self-management and prioritizing quality of life, and maintaining hope for positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The shared decision-making process for autoHSCT between older patients with hematological malignancies and physicians is shaped by physician-driven factors, patient-driven factors, and mutual trust. These findings provide a foundation for developing patient-centered care strategies, including decision aids and enhanced communication training for physicians, aimed at improving outcomes for older patients facing complex treatment choices. Future research should explore how these factors interact over time, through longitudinal studies, to assess their long-term impact on patient outcomes and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142690155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adaptation, calibration, and validation of a cognitive assessment battery for telephone and video administration. 改编、校准和验证用于电话和视频管理的认知评估电池。
Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19275
Yonah Joffe, Julianna Liu, Franchesca Arias, Douglas Tommet, Tamara G Fong, Eva M Schmitt, Thomas Travison, Zachary J Kunicki, Sharon K Inouye, Richard N Jones

Background: Events such as global pandemics can force rapid adoption of new modes of assessment. We describe the evaluation of a modified neuropsychological assessment for web and telephone administration.

Methods: Telephone and video conferencing-based neuropsychological assessment procedures were developed and implemented within an ongoing observational study, the Successful Aging following Elective Surgery II (SAGES) study (N = 420 persons). Repeated cognitive assessments were used (N = 2008 observations). Analyses using latent variable psychometric methods were used to compare the measurement modes, and a nested validation sub-study (N = 100 persons) was used to test for measurement equivalence. We used item response theory methods to calibrate data collected by different assessment modes. Measurement equivalence was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis.

Results: Only small differences were detected between in-person and video modes of assessment. The largest difference among factor loadings was shared for the Boston Naming Test and Visual Search and attention test, but the effects were very small (Cohen's q = 0.06) and not statistically significant (95% confidence interval on q, -0.06, +0.18). In terms of item difficulty differences between in-person and video, the Digit Span Backwards test was less difficult by video with a small-to-moderate effect size (Cohen's d of -0.28, 95% CI, -0.54, -0.01). The contrast of in-person and telephone assessment was larger, with telephone assessment being less difficult than in-person (largest shift in item difficulty for digit span backwards, d = -1.12 95% CI -1.35, -0.90). Calibrated scores from telephone and videoconference demonstrated good agreement (r = 0.72, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80), and the differences could be corrected with latent variable measurement models.

Conclusions: Videoconference based neuropsychological assessment can be as precise as in-person. Calibration of ability estimates using latent variable measurement models can address measurement differences and generate scores without evidence of systematic bias.

背景:全球大流行病等事件会迫使人们迅速采用新的评估模式。我们描述了对网络和电话管理的改良神经心理学评估的评估:方法:在一项正在进行的观察性研究 "选择性手术后的成功衰老 II(SAGES)研究"(N = 420 人)中,开发并实施了基于电话和视频会议的神经心理评估程序。采用重复认知评估(N = 2008 次观察)。使用潜变量心理测量方法进行分析,以比较测量模式,并使用嵌套验证子研究(N = 100 人)来检验测量等效性。我们使用项目反应理论方法对不同评估模式收集的数据进行校准。测量等效性通过布兰-阿尔特曼图和回归分析进行评估:结果:在面对面评估模式和视频评估模式之间只发现了很小的差异。波士顿命名测试和视觉搜索与注意力测试的因子负荷差异最大,但影响非常小(Cohen's q = 0.06),且无统计学意义(q 的 95% 置信区间为 -0.06, +0.18)。就面对面测试和视频测试的项目难度差异而言,视频测试的数字跨度向后测试难度较低,且具有小到中等的效应大小(Cohen's d 为 -0.28,95% 置信区间为 -0.54,-0.01)。面对面评估和电话评估的反差较大,电话评估的难度低于面对面评估(数字跨度倒数的项目难度变化最大,d = -1.12 95% CI -1.35, -0.90)。电话和视频会议的校准分数显示出良好的一致性(r = 0.72,95% CI 0.61,0.80),差异可通过潜在变量测量模型进行修正:结论:基于视频会议的神经心理学评估与面对面评估一样精确。结论:基于视频会议的神经心理评估可以像面对面评估一样精确,使用潜在变量测量模型校正能力估计值可以解决测量差异问题,并生成没有系统性偏差证据的分数。
{"title":"Adaptation, calibration, and validation of a cognitive assessment battery for telephone and video administration.","authors":"Yonah Joffe, Julianna Liu, Franchesca Arias, Douglas Tommet, Tamara G Fong, Eva M Schmitt, Thomas Travison, Zachary J Kunicki, Sharon K Inouye, Richard N Jones","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19275","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Events such as global pandemics can force rapid adoption of new modes of assessment. We describe the evaluation of a modified neuropsychological assessment for web and telephone administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Telephone and video conferencing-based neuropsychological assessment procedures were developed and implemented within an ongoing observational study, the Successful Aging following Elective Surgery II (SAGES) study (N = 420 persons). Repeated cognitive assessments were used (N = 2008 observations). Analyses using latent variable psychometric methods were used to compare the measurement modes, and a nested validation sub-study (N = 100 persons) was used to test for measurement equivalence. We used item response theory methods to calibrate data collected by different assessment modes. Measurement equivalence was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only small differences were detected between in-person and video modes of assessment. The largest difference among factor loadings was shared for the Boston Naming Test and Visual Search and attention test, but the effects were very small (Cohen's q = 0.06) and not statistically significant (95% confidence interval on q, -0.06, +0.18). In terms of item difficulty differences between in-person and video, the Digit Span Backwards test was less difficult by video with a small-to-moderate effect size (Cohen's d of -0.28, 95% CI, -0.54, -0.01). The contrast of in-person and telephone assessment was larger, with telephone assessment being less difficult than in-person (largest shift in item difficulty for digit span backwards, d = -1.12 95% CI -1.35, -0.90). Calibrated scores from telephone and videoconference demonstrated good agreement (r = 0.72, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80), and the differences could be corrected with latent variable measurement models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Videoconference based neuropsychological assessment can be as precise as in-person. Calibration of ability estimates using latent variable measurement models can address measurement differences and generate scores without evidence of systematic bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation on hospital-associated disability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. 院内心脏康复对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后住院相关残疾的影响。
Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19265
Satoshi Katano, Yuji Kono, Toshiyuki Yano, Koshiro Kanaoka, Akinori Sawamura, Tetsufumi Motokawa, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Yusuke Ohya, Shin-Ichiro Miura, Nagaharu Fukuma, Shigeru Makita, Hideo Izawa

Background: Hospital-associated disability (HAD), a decline in the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) during hospitalization, is a modifiable target in integrated care for older adults. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on the development of HAD in older patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods: Older patients undergoing TAVI were extracted from the Japanese nationwide database (JROAD-DPC) from April 2014 to March 2021 and were divided into patients receiving inpatient CR (CR group) and a non-CR group. HAD was defined as a decrease in the Barthel Index (BI) score ≥5 points at discharge compared with the score at admission.

Results: Of 19,789 eligible patients, 17,066 (86%) underwent inpatient CR. The overall prevalence of HAD was 9.6%, with a lower incidence in the CR group than in the non-CR group (8.8% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.001). Random forest analysis revealed key features associated with HAD risk including BI score at admission, inpatient CR participation, age, body mass index (BMI), and chronic kidney disease. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that participation in inpatient CR was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of HAD (OR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.70), with similar results in inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted logistic regression analyses (OR, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.88). Analyses in subgroups of interest showed heterogeneity in the effects of inpatient CR with possible loss in patients with a BMI of <18.5 kg/m2 or a BI score of less than 60 points at admission.

Conclusions: The data suggest a beneficial effect of inpatient CR participation on the prevention of HAD in older patients undergoing TAVI, but the effect may be limited in lean patients with disability for ADL before TAVI.

背景:医院相关残疾(HAD)是指住院期间日常生活能力(ADL)的下降,是老年人综合护理的一个可调节目标。本研究旨在确定住院心脏康复(CR)对接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的主动脉瓣狭窄老年患者 HAD 发展的影响:从日本全国数据库(JROAD-DPC)中提取2014年4月至2021年3月期间接受TAVI手术的老年患者,并将其分为接受住院CR的患者(CR组)和非CR组。HAD的定义是出院时巴特尔指数(Barthel Index,BI)与入院时相比下降≥5分:在 19,789 名符合条件的患者中,17,066 人(86%)接受了住院 CR 治疗。HAD的总发生率为9.6%,CR组的发生率低于非CR组(8.8% vs. 14.2%,P 2):这些数据表明,住院患者参与CR对预防接受TAVI的老年患者的HAD有好处,但对于TAVI前有ADL残疾的瘦弱患者来说,效果可能有限。
{"title":"Impact of in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation on hospital-associated disability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.","authors":"Satoshi Katano, Yuji Kono, Toshiyuki Yano, Koshiro Kanaoka, Akinori Sawamura, Tetsufumi Motokawa, Yoshihiro Miyamoto, Yusuke Ohya, Shin-Ichiro Miura, Nagaharu Fukuma, Shigeru Makita, Hideo Izawa","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19265","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-associated disability (HAD), a decline in the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) during hospitalization, is a modifiable target in integrated care for older adults. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on the development of HAD in older patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older patients undergoing TAVI were extracted from the Japanese nationwide database (JROAD-DPC) from April 2014 to March 2021 and were divided into patients receiving inpatient CR (CR group) and a non-CR group. HAD was defined as a decrease in the Barthel Index (BI) score ≥5 points at discharge compared with the score at admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 19,789 eligible patients, 17,066 (86%) underwent inpatient CR. The overall prevalence of HAD was 9.6%, with a lower incidence in the CR group than in the non-CR group (8.8% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.001). Random forest analysis revealed key features associated with HAD risk including BI score at admission, inpatient CR participation, age, body mass index (BMI), and chronic kidney disease. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that participation in inpatient CR was associated with a lower odds ratio (OR) of HAD (OR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.70), with similar results in inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted logistic regression analyses (OR, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.88). Analyses in subgroups of interest showed heterogeneity in the effects of inpatient CR with possible loss in patients with a BMI of <18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or a BI score of less than 60 points at admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data suggest a beneficial effect of inpatient CR participation on the prevention of HAD in older patients undergoing TAVI, but the effect may be limited in lean patients with disability for ADL before TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142683830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1