Objective: To compare platelet count results of specimens that yield platelet clump flags to platelet count results on these specimens after vortexing.
Method: Specimens that generated platelet count flags on Sysmex XN 3000 instruments were vortexed and rerun. Only data from specimens demonstrating elimination of platelet clump flags were used in this study. Pearson r analysis was performed on data.
Results: Comparison of complete blood count results (white blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count) all yielded Pearson r scores >0.9.
Conclusion: Additional patient comfort and safety concerns, as well as concerns over additional specimen collection and processing costs, may be avoided by vortexing and rerunning specimens flagged for platelet clumps when the platelet count is normal.
目的:比较产生血小板团块标志的标本与这些标本涡旋后的血小板计数结果:比较产生血小板团块标志的标本的血小板计数结果与这些标本涡旋后的血小板计数结果:方法:对 Sysmex XN 3000 仪器上出现血小板计数标志的标本进行涡旋处理并重新运行。本研究仅使用血小板团块标志消除的标本数据。对数据进行了 Pearson r 分析:结果:比较全血细胞计数结果(白细胞计数、红细胞计数、血红蛋白、血细胞比容和血小板计数),Pearson r 得分均大于 0.9:结论:在血小板计数正常的情况下,对标记为血小板团块的标本进行涡旋处理并重新运行,可避免增加患者的舒适度和安全性,以及额外的标本采集和处理成本。
{"title":"Vortexing specimens to disaggregate platelet clumps in EDTA specimens.","authors":"Lillian Mundt","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad105","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare platelet count results of specimens that yield platelet clump flags to platelet count results on these specimens after vortexing.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Specimens that generated platelet count flags on Sysmex XN 3000 instruments were vortexed and rerun. Only data from specimens demonstrating elimination of platelet clump flags were used in this study. Pearson r analysis was performed on data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of complete blood count results (white blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count) all yielded Pearson r scores >0.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional patient comfort and safety concerns, as well as concerns over additional specimen collection and processing costs, may be avoided by vortexing and rerunning specimens flagged for platelet clumps when the platelet count is normal.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"439-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139076489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Thomas Herb, Alexander S Taylor, Shih-Hon Li, David M Manthei, Carmen Gherasim
We present 3 cases of discordant results from screening hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measured by ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) all due to various forms of interference and flagged by the instrument as "suspected hemoglobin E (HbE)." The first case was due to a rare hemoglobin variant, later confirmed to be hemoglobin Hoshida, the second due to "true" heterozygous HbE, and the third a result of analytical artifact causing splitting of the HbA1c peak without an underlying variant hemoglobin. We examine the similarities in these cases along with the laboratory work-up to classify each cause of interference to demonstrate the wide array of potential causes for the suspected HbE flag and why it warrants proper work-up. Because there is no standardized method of reporting out hemoglobin variant interference in HbA1c measurement, we discuss our laboratory's process of investigating discordant HbA1c measurements and reporting results in cases with variant interference as 1 possible model to follow, along with discussing the associated laboratory, ethical, and clinical considerations. We also examine the structure of hemoglobin Hoshida, HbE, and conduct a brief literature review of previous reports.
{"title":"Uncommon causes of hemoglobin E flags identified during measurement of hemoglobin A1c by ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography.","authors":"Thomas Herb, Alexander S Taylor, Shih-Hon Li, David M Manthei, Carmen Gherasim","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad113","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present 3 cases of discordant results from screening hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measured by ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) all due to various forms of interference and flagged by the instrument as \"suspected hemoglobin E (HbE).\" The first case was due to a rare hemoglobin variant, later confirmed to be hemoglobin Hoshida, the second due to \"true\" heterozygous HbE, and the third a result of analytical artifact causing splitting of the HbA1c peak without an underlying variant hemoglobin. We examine the similarities in these cases along with the laboratory work-up to classify each cause of interference to demonstrate the wide array of potential causes for the suspected HbE flag and why it warrants proper work-up. Because there is no standardized method of reporting out hemoglobin variant interference in HbA1c measurement, we discuss our laboratory's process of investigating discordant HbA1c measurements and reporting results in cases with variant interference as 1 possible model to follow, along with discussing the associated laboratory, ethical, and clinical considerations. We also examine the structure of hemoglobin Hoshida, HbE, and conduct a brief literature review of previous reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"528-533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139521276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To assess the diagnostic value of urinary transferrin (Tf) in early diabetic nephropathy (DN) to propose a more sensitive and noninvasive biomarker for screening and monitoring DN in clinical practice.
Methods: We searched 3 databases from their inception to May 2023, to identify studies investigating the diagnostic value of Tf in patients with DN. Meta-DiSc software, version 1.4, and Stata software, version 15.1 (StataCorp) were used to conduct a meta-analysis and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of urine Tf levels for DN.
Results: The meta-analysis included 6 relevant studies investigating the diagnostic value of Tf level for DN. Urinary Tf as a diagnostic marker demonstrated a combined sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and specificity of 0.88 (0.84-0.92). the positive diagnostic likelihood ratio was 7.07 (4.57-10.93), the negative diagnostic likelihood ratio was 0.20 (0.12-0.35), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 34.49 (13.61-87.44). Also, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (0.89-0.94), indicating that urinary Tf has a decent discriminative ability in diagnosing DN.
Conclusion: Tf level is a valuable biological marker for early diagnosis and monitoring of DN in clinical practice. It has statistically significant predictive value for patients in the early phases of DN.
{"title":"A meta-analysis of urinary transferrin for early diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy.","authors":"Bangjian Li, Jieying Wang, Wen Ye","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad115","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic value of urinary transferrin (Tf) in early diabetic nephropathy (DN) to propose a more sensitive and noninvasive biomarker for screening and monitoring DN in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 3 databases from their inception to May 2023, to identify studies investigating the diagnostic value of Tf in patients with DN. Meta-DiSc software, version 1.4, and Stata software, version 15.1 (StataCorp) were used to conduct a meta-analysis and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of urine Tf levels for DN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 6 relevant studies investigating the diagnostic value of Tf level for DN. Urinary Tf as a diagnostic marker demonstrated a combined sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71-0.89) and specificity of 0.88 (0.84-0.92). the positive diagnostic likelihood ratio was 7.07 (4.57-10.93), the negative diagnostic likelihood ratio was 0.20 (0.12-0.35), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 34.49 (13.61-87.44). Also, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (0.89-0.94), indicating that urinary Tf has a decent discriminative ability in diagnosing DN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tf level is a valuable biological marker for early diagnosis and monitoring of DN in clinical practice. It has statistically significant predictive value for patients in the early phases of DN.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"413-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139713568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: A substantial number of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have bone destruction are initially admitted into the orthopedic service at the hospital. However, routine laboratory testing usually fails to identify these patients, thus delaying optimal therapy. Therefore, there is a clear medical need for early diagnosis of MM in these patients.
Methods: Between 2019 and 2021, 42 patients receiving treatment for orthopedic conditions had normal hemoglobin (Hb), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), creatinine (CREA), and blood calcium (Ca) levels before their surgical procedure(s) but were subsequently pathologically confirmed to have MM, based on their presenting orthopedic symptoms. During the same period, 52 patients with orthopedic conditions were pathologically excluded from the diagnosis of MM and were recruited into our control group. Serum free light chain (sFLC) testing was performed in 94 consecutive patients in the orthopedic service using Siemens N Latex FLC kits. The levels of Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca were also measured. All 42 patients with MM were divided into group A (n = 25: κ proliferation) and group B (n = 17: λ proliferation) by the pathology department.
Results: There were no significant differences in levels of Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca between group A and group B and the control group. However, the sFLC κ/λ ratio of group A and B was also significantly different from that of the control group (P < .001). The results of serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) testing demonstrated negative results in 14 cases (58.3%) in group A and 4 cases (25.0%) in group B.
Conclusions: Some patients with orthopedic conditions who do not have typical MM laboratory results, such as those with abnormal Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca levels before their operation(s), actually have MM. MM should be highly suspected in patients with unexplained bone lesions and with an abnormal sFLC κ/λ ratio. Further tissue or bone marrow biopsy is needed in these patients even if serum and urine IFE results are negative and light chain ratio is normal.
背景:很多骨质破坏的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者最初都是在医院骨科就诊的。然而,常规实验室检测通常无法识别这些患者,从而延误了最佳治疗时机。因此,这些患者显然需要早期诊断出 MM:方法:2019 年至 2021 年间,42 名因骨科疾病接受治疗的患者在接受手术治疗前血红蛋白 (Hb)、总蛋白 (TP)、白蛋白 (ALB)、肌酐 (CREA) 和血钙 (Ca) 水平正常,但随后根据其骨科症状经病理证实患有 MM。在同一时期,有 52 名骨科患者经病理检查排除了 MM 的诊断,被纳入我们的对照组。我们使用西门子 N Latex FLC 试剂盒对连续 94 名骨科患者进行了血清游离轻链(sFLC)检测。同时还测量了 Hb、TP、ALB、CREA 和 Ca 的水平。病理科将所有 42 名 MM 患者分为 A 组(n = 25:κ 增殖)和 B 组(n = 17:λ 增殖):结果:A 组和 B 组的 Hb、TP、ALB、CREA 和 Ca 水平与对照组无明显差异。但 A 组和 B 组的 sFLC κ/λ 比值与对照组相比也有显著差异(P < .001)。血清免疫固定电泳(IFE)检测结果显示,A组14例(58.3%)和B组4例(25.0%)为阴性:一些骨科疾病患者的实验室检查结果并不典型,如手术前 Hb、TP、ALB、CREA 和 Ca 水平异常的患者,实际上患有 MM。对于不明原因的骨损伤和 sFLC κ/λ 比值异常的患者,应高度怀疑 MM。即使血清和尿液 IFE 结果为阴性且轻链比值正常,也需要对这些患者进行进一步的组织或骨髓活检。
{"title":"Urine immunofixation electrophoresis and serum free light chain analyses benefit diagnosis of multiple myeloma in orthopedic patients with normal serum total proteins, creatinine, calcium, and hemoglobin.","authors":"Zhongwei Jia, Jinxing Xia, Qiong Lu","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad104","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A substantial number of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have bone destruction are initially admitted into the orthopedic service at the hospital. However, routine laboratory testing usually fails to identify these patients, thus delaying optimal therapy. Therefore, there is a clear medical need for early diagnosis of MM in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2019 and 2021, 42 patients receiving treatment for orthopedic conditions had normal hemoglobin (Hb), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), creatinine (CREA), and blood calcium (Ca) levels before their surgical procedure(s) but were subsequently pathologically confirmed to have MM, based on their presenting orthopedic symptoms. During the same period, 52 patients with orthopedic conditions were pathologically excluded from the diagnosis of MM and were recruited into our control group. Serum free light chain (sFLC) testing was performed in 94 consecutive patients in the orthopedic service using Siemens N Latex FLC kits. The levels of Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca were also measured. All 42 patients with MM were divided into group A (n = 25: κ proliferation) and group B (n = 17: λ proliferation) by the pathology department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in levels of Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca between group A and group B and the control group. However, the sFLC κ/λ ratio of group A and B was also significantly different from that of the control group (P < .001). The results of serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) testing demonstrated negative results in 14 cases (58.3%) in group A and 4 cases (25.0%) in group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some patients with orthopedic conditions who do not have typical MM laboratory results, such as those with abnormal Hb, TP, ALB, CREA, and Ca levels before their operation(s), actually have MM. MM should be highly suspected in patients with unexplained bone lesions and with an abnormal sFLC κ/λ ratio. Further tissue or bone marrow biopsy is needed in these patients even if serum and urine IFE results are negative and light chain ratio is normal.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"454-459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139033135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been commonly calculated by equations, but their performance has not been entirely satisfactory. This study aimed to develop a more accurate LDL-C prediction model using machine learning methods.
Methods: The study involved predicting directly measured LDL-C, using individual characteristics, lipid profiles, and other laboratory results as predictors. The models applied to predict LDL-C values were multiple regression, penalized regression, random forest, and XGBoost. Additionally, a novel 2-step prediction model was developed and introduced. The machine learning methods were evaluated against the Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson equations.
Results: The Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson equations had root mean squared error (RMSE) values of 12.112, 8.084, and 8.492, respectively, whereas the 2-step prediction model showed the highest accuracy, with an RMSE of 7.015. The LDL-C levels were also classified as a categorical variable according to the diagnostic criteria of the dyslipidemia treatment guideline, and concordance rates were calculated between the predictive values obtained from each method and the directly measured ones. The 2-step prediction model had the highest concordance rate (85.1%).
Conclusion: The machine learning method can calculate LDL-C more accurately than existing equations. The proposed 2-step prediction model, in particular, outperformed the other machine learning methods.
{"title":"Prediction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels using machine learning methods.","authors":"Yoori Kim, Won Kyung Lee, Woojoo Lee","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad114","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been commonly calculated by equations, but their performance has not been entirely satisfactory. This study aimed to develop a more accurate LDL-C prediction model using machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved predicting directly measured LDL-C, using individual characteristics, lipid profiles, and other laboratory results as predictors. The models applied to predict LDL-C values were multiple regression, penalized regression, random forest, and XGBoost. Additionally, a novel 2-step prediction model was developed and introduced. The machine learning methods were evaluated against the Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Friedewald, Martin, and Sampson equations had root mean squared error (RMSE) values of 12.112, 8.084, and 8.492, respectively, whereas the 2-step prediction model showed the highest accuracy, with an RMSE of 7.015. The LDL-C levels were also classified as a categorical variable according to the diagnostic criteria of the dyslipidemia treatment guideline, and concordance rates were calculated between the predictive values obtained from each method and the directly measured ones. The 2-step prediction model had the highest concordance rate (85.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The machine learning method can calculate LDL-C more accurately than existing equations. The proposed 2-step prediction model, in particular, outperformed the other machine learning methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"471-484"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139466770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ivana Lapić, Dunja Rogić, Ana Lončar Vrančić, Ivan Gornik
Background: Diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in identification of intracranial abnormalities detected by computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and in patients with mild neurological symptoms not caused by head trauma but suspected with a neurological disorder, was examined.
Methods: GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined using the chemiluminescence immunoassays on the Alinity i analyzer (Abbott Laboratories).
Results: Significantly higher GFAP (median 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L, P < .001) and UCH-L1 (median 350.9 vs 153.9 ng/L, P < .001) were found in mTBI compared to non-head trauma patients. In mTBI diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 were 100% and 30.9%, respectively, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.655. GFAP alone yielded Se 85.7%, Sp 41.8%, and AUC 0.638, while UCH-L1 yielded Se 57.1%, Sp 56.4%, and AUC 0.568. In non-head trauma patients, the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 showed Se 100%, Sp 87.9%, and AUC 0.939, while GFAP alone demonstrated Se 100%, Sp 90.9%, and AUC 0.955.
Conclusions: If these results are reproduced on a larger sample, GFAP and UCH-L1 may reduce CT use in patients with mild neurological symptoms after systemic causes exclusion and neurologist's evaluation.
背景:研究了神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素C-末端水解酶L1(UCH-L1)在轻度脑外伤(mTBI)患者和非头部外伤引起的轻度神经症状但怀疑患有神经系统疾病的患者中用于识别计算机断层扫描(CT)检测到的颅内异常的诊断准确性:方法:使用 Alinity i 分析仪(雅培实验室)上的化学发光免疫测定法测定 GFAP 和 UCH-L1:结果:GFAP 明显高于 UCH-L1(中位数为 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L,P如果这些结果能在更大样本中重现,GFAP 和 UCH-L1 可减少轻微神经症状患者在排除全身病因和神经科医生评估后使用 CT 的次数。
{"title":"Exploratory analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in management of patients with mild neurological symptoms undergoing head computed tomography scan at the emergency department: a pilot study from a Croatian tertiary hospital.","authors":"Ivana Lapić, Dunja Rogić, Ana Lončar Vrančić, Ivan Gornik","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad116","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in identification of intracranial abnormalities detected by computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and in patients with mild neurological symptoms not caused by head trauma but suspected with a neurological disorder, was examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined using the chemiluminescence immunoassays on the Alinity i analyzer (Abbott Laboratories).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher GFAP (median 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L, P < .001) and UCH-L1 (median 350.9 vs 153.9 ng/L, P < .001) were found in mTBI compared to non-head trauma patients. In mTBI diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 were 100% and 30.9%, respectively, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.655. GFAP alone yielded Se 85.7%, Sp 41.8%, and AUC 0.638, while UCH-L1 yielded Se 57.1%, Sp 56.4%, and AUC 0.568. In non-head trauma patients, the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 showed Se 100%, Sp 87.9%, and AUC 0.939, while GFAP alone demonstrated Se 100%, Sp 90.9%, and AUC 0.955.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If these results are reproduced on a larger sample, GFAP and UCH-L1 may reduce CT use in patients with mild neurological symptoms after systemic causes exclusion and neurologist's evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"492-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139747996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Melissa J Smith, Hon K Yuen, Lindsey Davenport-Landry, Julia O'Donnell, Ibsa Abdi, Floyd Josephat, Jie Gao
Background: Medical laboratory science (MLS) professionals play a crucial role in health care teams. However, research culture in the profession has not been well developed or studied. It is necessary to characterize attitudes toward research and scholarly activities among MLS professionals and identify ways to promote research in the profession.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered through American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science channels. Survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics, and linear regression models were constructed to identify characteristics that predicted 2 research attitudes: "valuing the role of research" and "perceived research environment" in the profession.
Results: Of the 116 MLS professionals in this study, 53% reported currently participating in research activities. Opinions toward research were generally positive, although many respondents were not currently conducting research. Individuals with education and research practice focuses tended to place greater value on research, and education level was a significant predictor of perceived research environment. Dedicated research time and mentorship were cited as effective ways for employers to promote research in MLS.
Conclusion: Overall, respondents had favorable attitudes toward research in MLS, but approximately half of participants noted a lack of incentives to conduct research. This study highlights several initiatives that may be effective for promoting increased research activity among MLS professionals.
{"title":"Attitudes toward research and scholarly activities among medical laboratory science professionals in the United States.","authors":"Melissa J Smith, Hon K Yuen, Lindsey Davenport-Landry, Julia O'Donnell, Ibsa Abdi, Floyd Josephat, Jie Gao","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad120","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical laboratory science (MLS) professionals play a crucial role in health care teams. However, research culture in the profession has not been well developed or studied. It is necessary to characterize attitudes toward research and scholarly activities among MLS professionals and identify ways to promote research in the profession.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was administered through American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science channels. Survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics, and linear regression models were constructed to identify characteristics that predicted 2 research attitudes: \"valuing the role of research\" and \"perceived research environment\" in the profession.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 116 MLS professionals in this study, 53% reported currently participating in research activities. Opinions toward research were generally positive, although many respondents were not currently conducting research. Individuals with education and research practice focuses tended to place greater value on research, and education level was a significant predictor of perceived research environment. Dedicated research time and mentorship were cited as effective ways for employers to promote research in MLS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, respondents had favorable attitudes toward research in MLS, but approximately half of participants noted a lack of incentives to conduct research. This study highlights several initiatives that may be effective for promoting increased research activity among MLS professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"405-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wanying Sun, Changming Zhou, Caiqiu Peng, Ran Yang, Mengting Li, Jian Geng, Jihong Zhou, Liang Chen, Wei Li
Background: Plasma circular (circ)RNAs detected by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) may be ideal markers for liquid biopsy. However, ddPCR detection of circRNAs in plasma for diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma has been rarely reported.
Methods: An RNA sequencing analysis was performed in plasma from patients with early lung adenocarcinoma and healthy individuals. Droplet digital PCR was used to verify the differentially expressed genes.
Results: The copy numbers of circle RNALZIC (circLZIC)and circle RNACEP350 (circCEP350) in the plasma of lung adenocarcinoma patients were significantly higher than in plasma of healthy people, and the copy numbers in postoperative plasma of the same patients were significantly lower than those in preoperative plasma. CircLZIC and circCEP350 alone and in combination had diagnostic value in lung adenocarcinoma and early lung adenocarcinoma. CircLZIC and circCEP350 had more binding sites with multiple microRNAs. Their target genes were enriched in several signaling pathways.
Conclusion: The copy numbers of circLZIC and circCEP350 were higher in plasma of lung adenocarcinoma patients than in plasma of healthy controls, significantly correlated with tumor size and TNM stage, and closely related to the occurrence and development of tumors. These circRNAs may serve as molecular markers for the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma.
{"title":"Diagnostic value of plasma circular RNA based on droplet digital polymerase chain reaction in lung adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Wanying Sun, Changming Zhou, Caiqiu Peng, Ran Yang, Mengting Li, Jian Geng, Jihong Zhou, Liang Chen, Wei Li","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad101","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma circular (circ)RNAs detected by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) may be ideal markers for liquid biopsy. However, ddPCR detection of circRNAs in plasma for diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma has been rarely reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An RNA sequencing analysis was performed in plasma from patients with early lung adenocarcinoma and healthy individuals. Droplet digital PCR was used to verify the differentially expressed genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The copy numbers of circle RNALZIC (circLZIC)and circle RNACEP350 (circCEP350) in the plasma of lung adenocarcinoma patients were significantly higher than in plasma of healthy people, and the copy numbers in postoperative plasma of the same patients were significantly lower than those in preoperative plasma. CircLZIC and circCEP350 alone and in combination had diagnostic value in lung adenocarcinoma and early lung adenocarcinoma. CircLZIC and circCEP350 had more binding sites with multiple microRNAs. Their target genes were enriched in several signaling pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The copy numbers of circLZIC and circCEP350 were higher in plasma of lung adenocarcinoma patients than in plasma of healthy controls, significantly correlated with tumor size and TNM stage, and closely related to the occurrence and development of tumors. These circRNAs may serve as molecular markers for the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"420-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138483646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Rejected samples lead to prolonged turnaround time and delayed diagnosis and treatment of patients. This study was conducted to determine minimum acceptable sample volume in Sarstedt brand coagulation tubes to reduce high sample rejection rate.
Methods: Blood samples were drawn from 20 participants (10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients receiving oral anticoagulant) into coagulation tubes. Six samples were taken from each participant, with tube fill volumes of 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50%. Prothrombin time (PT), active partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen tests were analyzed.
Results: According to quality performance specifications, the tube fill volume must be at least 70% for PT and aPTT and 50% for fibrinogen. There was no statistical difference in samples from healthy volunteers for PT, aPTT, and fibrinogen tests when the minimum tube fill volume was at least 80%, 90%, and 50%, respectively. These percentages were 50%, 70%, and 60%, respectively, in patients receiving oral anticoagulant.
Conclusions: Sarstedt tubes meet quality standard specifications at a 70% fill rate for PT and aPTT and a 50% fill rate for fibrinogen. Comprehensive studies with larger populations are needed to accept these values as sample acceptance criteria for the laboratory.
{"title":"Are tube fill volumes below 90% a rejection criterion for all coagulation tests?","authors":"Merve Sena Odabasi, Zeynep Mine Yalcinkaya Kara","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad108","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad108","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rejected samples lead to prolonged turnaround time and delayed diagnosis and treatment of patients. This study was conducted to determine minimum acceptable sample volume in Sarstedt brand coagulation tubes to reduce high sample rejection rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were drawn from 20 participants (10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients receiving oral anticoagulant) into coagulation tubes. Six samples were taken from each participant, with tube fill volumes of 100%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 60%, and 50%. Prothrombin time (PT), active partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen tests were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to quality performance specifications, the tube fill volume must be at least 70% for PT and aPTT and 50% for fibrinogen. There was no statistical difference in samples from healthy volunteers for PT, aPTT, and fibrinogen tests when the minimum tube fill volume was at least 80%, 90%, and 50%, respectively. These percentages were 50%, 70%, and 60%, respectively, in patients receiving oral anticoagulant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sarstedt tubes meet quality standard specifications at a 70% fill rate for PT and aPTT and a 50% fill rate for fibrinogen. Comprehensive studies with larger populations are needed to accept these values as sample acceptance criteria for the laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"442-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138815794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Megan S Pater, Júlia A Hernandez, Joesph R Wiencek
Background: Biannual instrument-correlation studies are required for nonwaived assays performed on multiple instruments.
Objective: To determine the feasibility of using College of American Pathologists (CAP) Quality Cross Check-Chemistry and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (CZQ) to assess instrument correlations among multiple analyzers, analyzer models, and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) licenses for 55 unique analytes.
Methods: Instrument correlation studies were performed on 9 Abbott ARCHITECT instruments (c4000 [n = 4], c8000 [n = 2], and c16000 [n = 3]) over 3 CLIA licenses using CZQ materials. The mean (SD) values, concentration difference, percent bias, and peer data for each individual level of CZQ were determined for each individual analyzer. Acceptable concentration and percentage for each analyte were set using criteria from CAP or other reputable sources such as the American Association of Bioanalysts or the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Peer data were provided by CAP with the CZQ kit.
Results: Correlations using CZQ materials showed that 94.5% of assays studied were within the acceptability criteria by percent bias only and 98.2% were within acceptability criteria by concentration difference.
Conclusions: The use of CZQ provides support to standardized correlation studies among instruments within and across separate CLIA licenses. However, widespread adoption of CZQ may be limited due to concerns regarding matrix effects, analyte ranges, and ease of data analysis.
{"title":"College of American Pathologists Quality Cross Check -Chemistry and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring as a tool for biannual instrument correlations.","authors":"Megan S Pater, Júlia A Hernandez, Joesph R Wiencek","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad111","DOIUrl":"10.1093/labmed/lmad111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biannual instrument-correlation studies are required for nonwaived assays performed on multiple instruments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility of using College of American Pathologists (CAP) Quality Cross Check-Chemistry and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (CZQ) to assess instrument correlations among multiple analyzers, analyzer models, and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) licenses for 55 unique analytes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Instrument correlation studies were performed on 9 Abbott ARCHITECT instruments (c4000 [n = 4], c8000 [n = 2], and c16000 [n = 3]) over 3 CLIA licenses using CZQ materials. The mean (SD) values, concentration difference, percent bias, and peer data for each individual level of CZQ were determined for each individual analyzer. Acceptable concentration and percentage for each analyte were set using criteria from CAP or other reputable sources such as the American Association of Bioanalysts or the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Peer data were provided by CAP with the CZQ kit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlations using CZQ materials showed that 94.5% of assays studied were within the acceptability criteria by percent bias only and 98.2% were within acceptability criteria by concentration difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of CZQ provides support to standardized correlation studies among instruments within and across separate CLIA licenses. However, widespread adoption of CZQ may be limited due to concerns regarding matrix effects, analyte ranges, and ease of data analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"460-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139466485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}