Pub Date : 2026-03-19DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108922
Jun Wei, Yang Liu
Background: The triglyceride-glucose frailty index integrates metabolic load and physiological vulnerability. Its association with incident stroke among individuals at cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3 remains unclear.
Methods: We performed an observational cohort analysis in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Adults at cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3 who were free of stroke at baseline were included. The exposure of interest was the triglyceride-glucose frailty index, and the outcome was incident stroke during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted associations. Nonlinearity was assessed with restricted cubic splines. Effect modification by baseline cognitive function was tested using interaction terms. Regression-based mediation evaluated self-rated health and hypertension.
Results: A total of 6882 adults without stroke at baseline were included, among whom 583 incident strokes occurred during follow-up, an incidence of 8.47%. Stroke incidence increased across tertiles of the triglyceride-glucose frailty index, from 5.14% to 8.24% and 12.03%, with clear separation of Kaplan-Meier curves. In Cox proportional hazards models, each 5-unit increase in the triglyceride-glucose frailty index was associated with a higher hazard of stroke, with a hazard ratio of 1.46 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.31 to 1.64. Compared with the lowest tertile, the hazard ratios were 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.95) and 2.16 (95% confidence interval 1.71 to 2.73) for the middle and highest tertiles, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analyses indicated a nonlinear association, with an inflection point at a triglyceride-glucose frailty index value of approximately 8.31. Below this level, stroke risk increased more steeply, whereas the association was attenuated above this threshold. Baseline cognitive function significantly modified the association, with stronger effects observed among individuals with better cognitive function. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested that self-rated health and hypertension accounted for approximately 23.0% and 7.6% of the overall statistical association, respectively. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded results that were broadly consistent with the primary findings.
Conclusions: Among adults at cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3, a higher triglyceride-glucose frailty index was associated with an increased risk of incident stroke. This association was nonlinear, varied by baseline cognitive function, and was partially mediated by self-rated health and hypertension.
{"title":"Nonlinear association between triglyceride-glucose frailty index and new-onset stroke in adults at cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3: a CHARLS cohort study.","authors":"Jun Wei, Yang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The triglyceride-glucose frailty index integrates metabolic load and physiological vulnerability. Its association with incident stroke among individuals at cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3 remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational cohort analysis in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Adults at cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3 who were free of stroke at baseline were included. The exposure of interest was the triglyceride-glucose frailty index, and the outcome was incident stroke during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted associations. Nonlinearity was assessed with restricted cubic splines. Effect modification by baseline cognitive function was tested using interaction terms. Regression-based mediation evaluated self-rated health and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6882 adults without stroke at baseline were included, among whom 583 incident strokes occurred during follow-up, an incidence of 8.47%. Stroke incidence increased across tertiles of the triglyceride-glucose frailty index, from 5.14% to 8.24% and 12.03%, with clear separation of Kaplan-Meier curves. In Cox proportional hazards models, each 5-unit increase in the triglyceride-glucose frailty index was associated with a higher hazard of stroke, with a hazard ratio of 1.46 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.31 to 1.64. Compared with the lowest tertile, the hazard ratios were 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.95) and 2.16 (95% confidence interval 1.71 to 2.73) for the middle and highest tertiles, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analyses indicated a nonlinear association, with an inflection point at a triglyceride-glucose frailty index value of approximately 8.31. Below this level, stroke risk increased more steeply, whereas the association was attenuated above this threshold. Baseline cognitive function significantly modified the association, with stronger effects observed among individuals with better cognitive function. Exploratory mediation analyses suggested that self-rated health and hypertension accounted for approximately 23.0% and 7.6% of the overall statistical association, respectively. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded results that were broadly consistent with the primary findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among adults at cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0-3, a higher triglyceride-glucose frailty index was associated with an increased risk of incident stroke. This association was nonlinear, varied by baseline cognitive function, and was partially mediated by self-rated health and hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"208 ","pages":"108922"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147494966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Global population aging has made frailty a critical public health concern. While a frailty index (FI) is able to quantify frailty effectively, its association with fall risk needs further validation across diverse populations and cultural contexts.
Methods: This study analyzed data from 24,526 participants aged ≥45 years from national cohorts in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, the English Longitudinal Study of Aging, and the US Health and Retirement Study. The association between a health deficit-based frailty index and self-reported falls over two years was assessed using a model with multivariable adjustment logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and stratified analyses.
Results: The mean baseline score on the frailty index was 0.1 in China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, 0.2 in English Longitudinal Study of Aging, and 0.4 in Health and Retirement Study. A significant positive association was observed between frailty score and fall risk after multivariable adjustment (P < 0.001), with adjusted odds ratios of 1.45, 1.51, and 1.86 per unit increase in score, respectively. A nonlinear dose-response relationship (P < 0.001) and significant sex interaction (P < 0.001) were identified, with a stronger association in men.
Conclusion: The frailty index is a significant predictor of fall risk in middle-age and older adults, with variations across countries and sexes, supporting its utility as a practical screening tool for targeted interventions to promote healthy aging.
{"title":"The relationship between a frailty index and fall risk in middle-aged and older adults: Findings from three prospective cohort studies - CHARLS, ELSA and HRS.","authors":"Tiantian Geng, Shujuan Zhao, Wenjuan Xi, Huan Peng, Caiyu Sheng, Zhonghua Sun, Chiwei Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global population aging has made frailty a critical public health concern. While a frailty index (FI) is able to quantify frailty effectively, its association with fall risk needs further validation across diverse populations and cultural contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from 24,526 participants aged ≥45 years from national cohorts in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, the English Longitudinal Study of Aging, and the US Health and Retirement Study. The association between a health deficit-based frailty index and self-reported falls over two years was assessed using a model with multivariable adjustment logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and stratified analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean baseline score on the frailty index was 0.1 in China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, 0.2 in English Longitudinal Study of Aging, and 0.4 in Health and Retirement Study. A significant positive association was observed between frailty score and fall risk after multivariable adjustment (P < 0.001), with adjusted odds ratios of 1.45, 1.51, and 1.86 per unit increase in score, respectively. A nonlinear dose-response relationship (P < 0.001) and significant sex interaction (P < 0.001) were identified, with a stronger association in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frailty index is a significant predictor of fall risk in middle-age and older adults, with variations across countries and sexes, supporting its utility as a practical screening tool for targeted interventions to promote healthy aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"208 ","pages":"108919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147492381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-14DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108916
Laura Harper, Kennedy Sparling, Sarah Anderson, Curtis L Simmons, Jessica Fraker, Bhavika K Patel, Jeremiah Sanders, Macy Leming, Alan Zhu, Richard Sharpe
Breast cancer remains a prevalent health concern, affecting approximately one in eight women during their lifetime. While screening mammography has significantly reduced mortality through early detection, its sensitivity is compromised in women with dense breast tissue-a factor that not only increases cancer risk but also obscures malignancies on imaging. Digital breast tomosynthesis has enhanced screening capabilities over traditional 2D mammography, yet limitations persist for dense breasts. In response, recent US federal legislation mandates that mammography lay summaries inform patients about the implications of breast density, including reduced detection rates and elevated risk. Additionally, insurance coverage for supplemental imaging is expanding across the United States. Supplemental screening modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging, whole-breast ultrasound, contrast-enhanced mammography, and molecular breast imaging offer improved detection in dense tissue, but guidance for average-risk women remains unclear. This lack of consensus can lead to confusion among patients and providers. This article aims to equip clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of breast density's impact on screening efficacy, the available supplemental imaging options, and current societal recommendations. By clarifying these considerations, clinicians can better navigate shared decision-making with average-risk patients regarding breast cancer screening.
{"title":"Considerations in Breast cancer screening, density and supplemental imaging in average-risk women.","authors":"Laura Harper, Kennedy Sparling, Sarah Anderson, Curtis L Simmons, Jessica Fraker, Bhavika K Patel, Jeremiah Sanders, Macy Leming, Alan Zhu, Richard Sharpe","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer remains a prevalent health concern, affecting approximately one in eight women during their lifetime. While screening mammography has significantly reduced mortality through early detection, its sensitivity is compromised in women with dense breast tissue-a factor that not only increases cancer risk but also obscures malignancies on imaging. Digital breast tomosynthesis has enhanced screening capabilities over traditional 2D mammography, yet limitations persist for dense breasts. In response, recent US federal legislation mandates that mammography lay summaries inform patients about the implications of breast density, including reduced detection rates and elevated risk. Additionally, insurance coverage for supplemental imaging is expanding across the United States. Supplemental screening modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging, whole-breast ultrasound, contrast-enhanced mammography, and molecular breast imaging offer improved detection in dense tissue, but guidance for average-risk women remains unclear. This lack of consensus can lead to confusion among patients and providers. This article aims to equip clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of breast density's impact on screening efficacy, the available supplemental imaging options, and current societal recommendations. By clarifying these considerations, clinicians can better navigate shared decision-making with average-risk patients regarding breast cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"208 ","pages":"108916"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147489103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-12DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108915
Yuko Minami, Hiroshi Tada, Masaaki Kawai, Seiki Kanemura, Koji Onuki, Takanori Ishida, Yoichiro Kakugawa
Background: Intratumoral estrogens may contribute to the growth of breast cancer. Risk factors for breast cancer, including reproductive factors, may influence intratumoral hormone levels.
Methods: This cross-sectional study of 146 postmenopausal women with breast cancer investigated associations of reproductive factors, including parity and breastfeeding history, with serum and intratumoral (tissue) hormone levels, as well as aromatase activity, by hormone receptor subtype classified as estrogen receptor-positive or estrogen receptor-negative and progesterone receptor-negative, using analysis of covariance. Hormone levels and aromatase activity in paired serum and tumor tissue samples were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and the tritiated water-release assay. Epidemiological data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire.
Findings: Among women with estrogen receptor-positive cancer, parity history (nulliparous vs. parous) was not significantly associated with serum or tissue hormone levels. No linear association was observed between parity number (nulliparous, 1, 2, ≥3) and tissue estradiol levels (age- and stage-adjusted means: 109.2, 76.7, 85.9, and 113.2 pg/g, respectively; p = 0.58). Tissue estradiol levels were significantly higher among parous women with breastfeeding history (age- and stage-adjusted mean: 103.2 pg/g) than among those without (64.5 pg/g, p = 0.01). In estrogen receptor-negative and progesterone receptor-negative cancers, no associations were observed between these reproductive factors and hormone levels or aromatase activity.
Conclusions: Reproductive history, particularly breastfeeding, may be associated with intratumoral estradiol levels in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. These findings suggest the importance of considering reproductive factors when investigating biological mechanisms underlying breast cancer progression and prognosis.
背景:肿瘤内雌激素可能促进乳腺癌的生长。乳腺癌的危险因素,包括生殖因素,可能影响肿瘤内激素水平。方法:对146例绝经后乳腺癌患者进行横断面研究,研究生殖因素(包括胎次和母乳喂养史)与血清和瘤内(组织)激素水平以及芳香化酶活性的关系,采用协方差分析,按激素受体亚型分为雌激素受体阳性或雌激素受体阴性和孕激素受体阴性。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法和氚化水释放法测定配对血清和肿瘤组织样品中的激素水平和芳香酶活性。流行病学数据通过自行填写的问卷收集。研究结果:在雌激素受体阳性的癌症女性中,产次史(未产与已产)与血清或组织激素水平无显著相关性。胎次(未产、1、2、≥3胎)与组织雌二醇水平之间无线性关联(年龄和分期调整后的平均值分别为109.2、76.7、85.9和113.2 pg/g; p = 0.58)。有母乳喂养史的产妇的组织雌二醇水平(年龄和阶段调整后的平均值:103.2 pg/g)明显高于没有母乳喂养史的产妇(64.5 pg/g, p = 0.01)。在雌激素受体阴性和孕激素受体阴性的癌症中,没有观察到这些生殖因素与激素水平或芳香化酶活性之间的关联。结论:绝经后雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的生殖史,特别是母乳喂养,可能与肿瘤内雌二醇水平有关。这些发现提示在研究乳腺癌进展和预后的生物学机制时考虑生殖因素的重要性。
{"title":"Associations of reproductive history with serum and intratumoral sex steroid hormone levels among postmenopausal women with breast cancer: Analysis of paired serum and tumor tissue samples.","authors":"Yuko Minami, Hiroshi Tada, Masaaki Kawai, Seiki Kanemura, Koji Onuki, Takanori Ishida, Yoichiro Kakugawa","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intratumoral estrogens may contribute to the growth of breast cancer. Risk factors for breast cancer, including reproductive factors, may influence intratumoral hormone levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study of 146 postmenopausal women with breast cancer investigated associations of reproductive factors, including parity and breastfeeding history, with serum and intratumoral (tissue) hormone levels, as well as aromatase activity, by hormone receptor subtype classified as estrogen receptor-positive or estrogen receptor-negative and progesterone receptor-negative, using analysis of covariance. Hormone levels and aromatase activity in paired serum and tumor tissue samples were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and the tritiated water-release assay. Epidemiological data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among women with estrogen receptor-positive cancer, parity history (nulliparous vs. parous) was not significantly associated with serum or tissue hormone levels. No linear association was observed between parity number (nulliparous, 1, 2, ≥3) and tissue estradiol levels (age- and stage-adjusted means: 109.2, 76.7, 85.9, and 113.2 pg/g, respectively; p = 0.58). Tissue estradiol levels were significantly higher among parous women with breastfeeding history (age- and stage-adjusted mean: 103.2 pg/g) than among those without (64.5 pg/g, p = 0.01). In estrogen receptor-negative and progesterone receptor-negative cancers, no associations were observed between these reproductive factors and hormone levels or aromatase activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reproductive history, particularly breastfeeding, may be associated with intratumoral estradiol levels in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. These findings suggest the importance of considering reproductive factors when investigating biological mechanisms underlying breast cancer progression and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"208 ","pages":"108915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147489122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-12DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108914
Laura Baquedano Mainar, Laura Nieto-Pascual, Eva Iglesias Bravo, Borja Otero García-Ramos, Iris Porcel Llaneza, Cèlia Torres Vilanova, Anna Muñoz Lloret, Joaquim Calaf Alsina
Vaginal estrogen is widely used to manage the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. However, its use by breast cancer survivors remains controversial, since some labeling indicates that it may increase the risk of recurrence, based on the known risks of systemic hormone therapy. This review synthesizes current evidence on breast cancer incidence and the use of vaginal estrogen in postmenopausal women, and its systemic absorption, as well as recurrence, mortality, and comparative data among vaginal estrogen formulations in breast cancer survivors, including those receiving aromatase inhibitors. Our findings show that vaginal estrogen results in minimal systemic absorption, and no demonstrated increase in the incidence of breast cancer, its recurrence, or mortality from breast cancer. In breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors, vaginal estrogen has not been associated with increased mortality, although evidence on its effect on recurrence remains controversial and the issue warrants further investigation. The absence of head-to-head comparisons of different formulations of vaginal estrogen in breast cancer survivors emphasizes the need for comparative studies to guide individualized treatment strategies. Recent updates from the US Food and Drug Administration, which removed boxed warnings related to breast cancer and acknowledged that vaginal estrogens have a safety profile that is distinct from that of systemic hormone therapy, reinforce our findings and represent an important step toward evidence-based regulation. Building on these regulatory advances, the increasing diagnosis of breast cancer in younger women and the prolonged burden of genitourinary syndrome of menopause underscore the need to translate this evidence into clinical practice by strengthening clinical confidence and supporting individualized, patient-centered decision-making for breast cancer survivors.
{"title":"Safety of vaginal estrogen in breast cancer survivors: Current evidence on systemic absorption and oncologic outcomes.","authors":"Laura Baquedano Mainar, Laura Nieto-Pascual, Eva Iglesias Bravo, Borja Otero García-Ramos, Iris Porcel Llaneza, Cèlia Torres Vilanova, Anna Muñoz Lloret, Joaquim Calaf Alsina","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108914","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaginal estrogen is widely used to manage the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. However, its use by breast cancer survivors remains controversial, since some labeling indicates that it may increase the risk of recurrence, based on the known risks of systemic hormone therapy. This review synthesizes current evidence on breast cancer incidence and the use of vaginal estrogen in postmenopausal women, and its systemic absorption, as well as recurrence, mortality, and comparative data among vaginal estrogen formulations in breast cancer survivors, including those receiving aromatase inhibitors. Our findings show that vaginal estrogen results in minimal systemic absorption, and no demonstrated increase in the incidence of breast cancer, its recurrence, or mortality from breast cancer. In breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors, vaginal estrogen has not been associated with increased mortality, although evidence on its effect on recurrence remains controversial and the issue warrants further investigation. The absence of head-to-head comparisons of different formulations of vaginal estrogen in breast cancer survivors emphasizes the need for comparative studies to guide individualized treatment strategies. Recent updates from the US Food and Drug Administration, which removed boxed warnings related to breast cancer and acknowledged that vaginal estrogens have a safety profile that is distinct from that of systemic hormone therapy, reinforce our findings and represent an important step toward evidence-based regulation. Building on these regulatory advances, the increasing diagnosis of breast cancer in younger women and the prolonged burden of genitourinary syndrome of menopause underscore the need to translate this evidence into clinical practice by strengthening clinical confidence and supporting individualized, patient-centered decision-making for breast cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"208 ","pages":"108914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147494972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-09DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108913
Maite Sánchez-Giraldo, Alberto Díaz-Cáceres, Ana Ojeda-Rodríguez, Alejandro López-Moreno, Juan Francisco Alcalá-Díaz, Juan Luis Romero-Cabrera, José David Torres-Peña, Esther Porras-Pérez, Eugenia Ruíz-Díaz Narváez, Javier Delgado-Lista, Pablo Pérez-Martínez, José López-Miranda, Oriol Alberto Rangel-Zúñiga
Objectives: Mortality from age-related diseases has risen in the last decade. MicroRNAs are key regulators of gene expression linked to these diseases, and their expression can be modulated by diet. This study examined how age and diet influence the expression of microRNAs associated with cardiovascular disease in patients with coronary heart disease.
Methods: From the CORDIOPREV cohort (n = 1002), 120 participants under 56 years and 120 over 66 years were selected through propensity score matching. To assess dietary effects, 60 individuals per age group followed either a low-fat or a Mediterranean diet. Expression of 28 microRNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was analyzed by RT-PCR at baseline and after 5 years.
Results: Younger participants (those aged under 56 years at baseline) showed increased expression of miR-1, miR-150, and miR-145 over time, while no significant changes were observed in older subjects (those over 66 years). Among younger individuals on the Mediterranean diet, miR-1 and miR-145 levels significantly increased after 5 years. Pathway analysis indicated that these microRNAs target genes (CCL2, ED1, SMAD3, PLCE1) related to inflammation, cell adhesion, and coagulation.
Conclusion: The Mediterranean diet may positively modulate the expression of microRNAs associated with cardiovascular disease, with this effect being particularly influenced by age in patients with coronary heart disease.
{"title":"Influence of age and diet on the expression of microRNAs in coronary heart disease: Findings from the CORDIOPREV study.","authors":"Maite Sánchez-Giraldo, Alberto Díaz-Cáceres, Ana Ojeda-Rodríguez, Alejandro López-Moreno, Juan Francisco Alcalá-Díaz, Juan Luis Romero-Cabrera, José David Torres-Peña, Esther Porras-Pérez, Eugenia Ruíz-Díaz Narváez, Javier Delgado-Lista, Pablo Pérez-Martínez, José López-Miranda, Oriol Alberto Rangel-Zúñiga","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mortality from age-related diseases has risen in the last decade. MicroRNAs are key regulators of gene expression linked to these diseases, and their expression can be modulated by diet. This study examined how age and diet influence the expression of microRNAs associated with cardiovascular disease in patients with coronary heart disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the CORDIOPREV cohort (n = 1002), 120 participants under 56 years and 120 over 66 years were selected through propensity score matching. To assess dietary effects, 60 individuals per age group followed either a low-fat or a Mediterranean diet. Expression of 28 microRNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was analyzed by RT-PCR at baseline and after 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger participants (those aged under 56 years at baseline) showed increased expression of miR-1, miR-150, and miR-145 over time, while no significant changes were observed in older subjects (those over 66 years). Among younger individuals on the Mediterranean diet, miR-1 and miR-145 levels significantly increased after 5 years. Pathway analysis indicated that these microRNAs target genes (CCL2, ED1, SMAD3, PLCE1) related to inflammation, cell adhesion, and coagulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Mediterranean diet may positively modulate the expression of microRNAs associated with cardiovascular disease, with this effect being particularly influenced by age in patients with coronary heart disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"208 ","pages":"108913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147482833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To investigate the controversial association between exogenous hormone use (EHU) and dementia, with a focus on subtype-specific risks.
Study design: This prospective cohort study followed 273,069 women in the UK Biobank over 3,802,608 person-years, identifying 4,710 dementia cases.
Main outcome measures: Cox models assessed use of oral contraceptive (OC) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in relation to all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) across treatment durations. Subgroup analyses were stratified by age, ethnicity, APOE status, education, income, and reproductive factors. A systematic review was conducted to synthesize existing evidence.
Results: In the cohort study, OC use was associated with reduced risks of all-cause dementia (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.84-0.95), AD (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.79-0.95), and VaD (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.70-0.93), particularly after 4-14 years of use. HRT showed no significant association with increased dementia risk. Synthesized results largely corroborated these findings: OC use was associated with reduced risks of dementia (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.89-0.92); and although four European studies reported a moderately increased AD risk after post-menopausal HRT use, neither cohort-based studies (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.90-1.06) nor traditional case-control studies (OR 1.00, 95%CI 0.90-1.11) found an association between HRT and dementia.
Conclusions: Our combined evidence does not support an increased risk of dementia associated with OC use; similarly, no clear association was observed between HRT and increased dementia risk. Clinical decisions on EHU should be individualized, balancing overall benefits against potential risks.
{"title":"Association between exogenous hormone use and dementia: A prospective cohort study and synthetic analysis.","authors":"Junyu Liu, Fang Cao, Zhisheng Li, Hanyue Zeng, Mengna Zhou, Qingyue He, Weixi Jiang, Yifeng Li, Junxia Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the controversial association between exogenous hormone use (EHU) and dementia, with a focus on subtype-specific risks.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This prospective cohort study followed 273,069 women in the UK Biobank over 3,802,608 person-years, identifying 4,710 dementia cases.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cox models assessed use of oral contraceptive (OC) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in relation to all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) across treatment durations. Subgroup analyses were stratified by age, ethnicity, APOE status, education, income, and reproductive factors. A systematic review was conducted to synthesize existing evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the cohort study, OC use was associated with reduced risks of all-cause dementia (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.84-0.95), AD (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.79-0.95), and VaD (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.70-0.93), particularly after 4-14 years of use. HRT showed no significant association with increased dementia risk. Synthesized results largely corroborated these findings: OC use was associated with reduced risks of dementia (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.89-0.92); and although four European studies reported a moderately increased AD risk after post-menopausal HRT use, neither cohort-based studies (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.90-1.06) nor traditional case-control studies (OR 1.00, 95%CI 0.90-1.11) found an association between HRT and dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our combined evidence does not support an increased risk of dementia associated with OC use; similarly, no clear association was observed between HRT and increased dementia risk. Clinical decisions on EHU should be individualized, balancing overall benefits against potential risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":"208 ","pages":"108895"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147476781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-11DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108879
Rocío Olmedo-Requena, Iratxe Inés-Puebla, Macarena Lozano-Lorca, José Alejandro Ávila-Cabreja, Carla González-Palacios Torres, María Ángeles Castillo-Hermoso, José Juan Jiménez-Moleón, Rocío Barrios-Rodríguez
Background and aim: Pregnancy-related exposures have been proposed as potential risk factors for breast cancer later in life, but findings remain inconclusive. This study aimed to update evidence on the associations between the exposure to pregnancy-related factors occurring up to birth-maternal and paternal age, gestational age at birth, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia-and breast cancer risk in daughters.
Material and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Searches were performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus. We included observational analytical studies assessing associations between parental age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia and breast cancer risk in daughters, reporting effect measures with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or sufficient data for calculation. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A dose-response meta-analysis evaluated the effects of maternal and paternal age, while random-effects models assessed the effects of gestational age, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and publication bias through funnel plots and Egger's tests.
Results: Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria; 57.7% were high quality. Breast cancer risk increased with maternal age up to 30 years (I2 = 10.7%, P = .26). A possible association for paternal age (I2 = 33.8%, P = .08) disappeared in subgroup analysis (I2 = 1.0%). No associations were found for gestational age (pooled OR [pOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.10), twin status (pOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.46), or maternal preeclampsia (pOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.64).
Conclusions: Increased maternal age may influence breast cancer risk in daughters. No associations were found for paternal age, gestational age, or twin status; conclusions for maternal preeclampsia remain uncertain due to heterogeneity.
背景和目的:怀孕相关暴露已被认为是以后生活中乳腺癌的潜在危险因素,但研究结果尚无定论。本研究旨在更新怀孕相关因素(母亲和父亲年龄、出生胎龄、双胞胎状况和母亲先兆子痫)与女儿乳腺癌风险之间关系的证据。材料和方法:进行系统综述和荟萃分析。在MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Web of Science和Scopus中进行搜索。我们纳入了观察性分析研究,评估父母年龄、胎龄、双胞胎状态与母亲子痫前期和女儿乳腺癌风险之间的关系,报告了95%置信区间(CI)或足够的计算数据的效果测量。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。一项剂量反应荟萃分析评估了母亲和父亲年龄的影响,而随机效应模型评估了胎龄、双胞胎状态和母亲先兆子痫的影响。异质性评估采用I2统计量,发表偏倚通过漏斗图和Egger检验。结果:52项研究符合纳入标准;57.7%为优质。随着产妇年龄的增加,乳腺癌风险增加至30岁(I2 = 10.7%, P = 0.26)。在亚组分析中,父亲年龄(I2 = 33.8%, P = 0.08)不存在可能的相关性(I2 = 1.0%)。胎龄(合并OR [pOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.84至1.10)、双胞胎状况(pOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97至1.46)或母体先兆子痫(pOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.71至1.64)均未发现相关性。结论:母亲年龄的增加可能影响女儿患乳腺癌的风险。未发现与父亲年龄、胎龄或双胞胎状况有关;由于异质性,母体子痫前期的结论仍不确定。
{"title":"Pregnancy-related factors and risk of breast cancer in daughters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Rocío Olmedo-Requena, Iratxe Inés-Puebla, Macarena Lozano-Lorca, José Alejandro Ávila-Cabreja, Carla González-Palacios Torres, María Ángeles Castillo-Hermoso, José Juan Jiménez-Moleón, Rocío Barrios-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2026.108879","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Pregnancy-related exposures have been proposed as potential risk factors for breast cancer later in life, but findings remain inconclusive. This study aimed to update evidence on the associations between the exposure to pregnancy-related factors occurring up to birth-maternal and paternal age, gestational age at birth, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia-and breast cancer risk in daughters.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Searches were performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus. We included observational analytical studies assessing associations between parental age, gestational age, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia and breast cancer risk in daughters, reporting effect measures with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or sufficient data for calculation. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A dose-response meta-analysis evaluated the effects of maternal and paternal age, while random-effects models assessed the effects of gestational age, twin status, and maternal preeclampsia. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and publication bias through funnel plots and Egger's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria; 57.7% were high quality. Breast cancer risk increased with maternal age up to 30 years (I<sup>2</sup> = 10.7%, P = .26). A possible association for paternal age (I<sup>2</sup> = 33.8%, P = .08) disappeared in subgroup analysis (I<sup>2</sup> = 1.0%). No associations were found for gestational age (pooled OR [pOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.10), twin status (pOR 1.19, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.46), or maternal preeclampsia (pOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased maternal age may influence breast cancer risk in daughters. No associations were found for paternal age, gestational age, or twin status; conclusions for maternal preeclampsia remain uncertain due to heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":" ","pages":"108879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147370951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108789
Marta Caretto, Elisa Casula, Tiziana Fidecicchi, Tommaso Simoncini
{"title":"Are Hormones a risk or an opportunity? Strategies for managing women predisposed to gynecological cancers.","authors":"Marta Caretto, Elisa Casula, Tiziana Fidecicchi, Tommaso Simoncini","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108789","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108789","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":" ","pages":"108789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145663175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-10DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108749
Meletios P Nigdelis, Irene Lambrinoudaki
{"title":"Endometriosis doesn't end with menopause: the updated EMAS clinical guide on endometriosis and menopausal health.","authors":"Meletios P Nigdelis, Irene Lambrinoudaki","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108749","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94131,"journal":{"name":"Maturitas","volume":" ","pages":"108749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145351131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}