Minerva gastroenterology最新文献

Background: Biological agents were found to alter the psychopathological profile of a small subgroup of patients treated for a variety of conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and psychiatric disorders. The association between the administration of biological agents and psychopathology needs to be further investigated.

Methods: In this naturalistic prospective cohort study, patients with IBD were assigned to two treatment groups, i.e., a biological agent (which also included tofacitinib) or conventional therapy. Clinician-administered scales were used to assess psychosomatic symptoms (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [Ham-D], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [Ham-A], Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS], and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [BPRS]) and disease activity (Mayo Score and Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI]) at baseline, after one, three, and six months of treatment. Each group was assessed for the course of their scores during the observation period at each assessment point.

Results: Patients on biological drugs who completed three months of treatment (N.=32) and six months of treatment (N.=20) scored significantly lower on the Mayo compared to baseline. Patients on conventional treatment obtained significant drops from baseline on the HBI after one and three months of treatment (N.=30) and also at the six-month endpoint (N.=11). Both groups showed no improvement or worsening on the psychiatric rating scales.

Conclusions: In this study, we found no evidence of psychiatric symptom worsening, as some literature would suggest. Our data suggest that the use of biological agents in IBD is safe.

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder with an important impact on patients' quality of life. Although several data indicate that psychological symptoms are frequently reported by patients with IBS, few therapies have been evaluated regarding these issues.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a probiotic-based dietary supplement (Colicron^®) in a group of patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). We included patients treated with Colicron^® (1 cps/day for 8 weeks). Primary endpoint was the gastrointestinal symptoms' remission evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); secondary endpoint was the impact of the treatment on physical and mental health evaluated by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) and Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). VAS was assessed at week 4 (T4), week 8 (T8) and week 12 (T12), whereas HADS and SF-36 were performed even at the start of the Colicron^® treatment (T0).

Results: An improvement of VAS Score was observed at T8 (P<0.001) and T12 (P<0.05) compared to T4. Lower HADS-A (anxiety subdomain) score was obtained at each time point versus T0 (P<0.01), and higher scores of all SF-36 domains were observed during the treatment (0.05

Conclusions: Colicron^® could be useful in improving both gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms in IBS-D patients. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Background: I-scan is an image enhancing technology that utilizes contrast, surface, and tone enhancement to examine the microvascular and microsurface structures of mucosa. Its ability to diagnosis GC is of growing interest due to its ability to make an optical diagnosis; however, only a handful of studies have explored its role in this setting. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic capability of i-scan for GC detection.

Methods: Multiple databases were searched for studies utilizing i-scan for GC detection until February 2024. Primary outcomes included the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results: Seven studies were included (371 patients, 220 GC lesions). The pooled sensitivity was 84% (four studies, 95% CI: 0.65; 0.93), specificity was 83% (three studies, 95% CI: 0.68; 0.92) and accuracy was 84% studies (N.=3, 95% CI: 0.69; 0.93).

Conclusions: I-scan appears to be an effective diagnostic tool for GC. However, the functional capabilities related to brightness detection may limits use. Further prospective, comparative studies are needed to determine its role in clinical practice compared to white light endoscopy, narrow band imaging and chromoendoscopy.

Small molecule therapy in inflammatory bowel disease has recently gained momentum. One such agent that was recently approved for use in Crohn's disease is upadacitinib. Even though clinical trials support the use of this agent and efficacy is impressive, real-world data remains limited and scattered in the current literature. This article aims to summarize the real-world data published so far about using upadacitinib in Crohn's disease.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, cholestatic, autoimmune disease, characterized by destruction of bile ducts. PBC predominantly affects women between 40 and 60 years of age. The presence of antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) is a serological feature of PBC. These highly specific antibodies are found in about 95% of patients with the disease. The family of enzymes located in the inner membrane of the mitochondria, called the 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex represents the target of the AMA. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a synthetic bile acid capable of protecting cholangiocytes from cholestatic damage caused by the accumulation of bile acids with a mechanism of action not yet well clarified. UDCA represents the gold standard therapy for PBC patients with recommended dose of 13-15 mg/kg/day. However, not every patient responds to therapy. On the other hand, the gut microbiota plays a key role in the onset of PBC through still unclear biochemical pathways. Less is known about its role as a potential biomarker after drug treatment. Actually, few studies analyzed the changes in gut microbiota composition before and after UDCA treatment. For this reason, this review represents an examination of the studies carried out on changes in gut microbiota composition in patients affected by PBC before and after treatment.