首页 > 最新文献

Polish journal of radiology最新文献

英文 中文
Synthetic magnetic resonance-based relaxometry in differentiating central nervous system tuberculoma and glioblastoma. 合成磁共振弛豫法鉴别中枢神经系统结核瘤和胶质母细胞瘤。
Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/202175
Sanket Dash, Sameer Vyas, Chirag Kamal Ahuja, Paramjeet Singh, Sarfraj Ahmad

Purpose: Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows reconstruction of multiple contrast-weighted images from a single acquisition of multiple delay multiple echo (MDME) sequence with quantitative relaxometry (longitudinal relaxation rate [R1], transverse relaxation rate [R2], and proton density [PD]) in a shorter acquisition time. We tried to explore synthetic MR-based relaxometry to differentiate central nervous system (CNS) tuberculomas from primary CNS neoplasm like glioblastoma.

Material and methods: Ten cases of CNS tuberculoma and 14 cases of glioblastoma underwent pre- and post-contrast synthetic MRI. R1, R2, and PD values were calculated from lesion core, wall, and perilesional oedema using free-hand region of interest and compared across the 2 groups.

Results: Both pre- and post-contrast R1 and R2 relaxation rates from core were significantly higher in tuberculoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.93, R2 - 15.02; post-contrast R1 - 1.51, R2 - 15.48) from glioblastoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.36, R2 - 4.58; post-contrast R1 - 0.43, R2 - 4.78). The same values were higher in perilesional oedema of glioblastoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.75, R2 - 9.9; post-contrast R1 - 0.78, R2 - 10.48) compared to tuberculoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.68, R2 - 8.57; post-contrast R1 - 0.72, R2 - 8.67). No significant difference was seen between relaxometry parameters from the walls of lesions.

Conclusions: Synthetic MR-based relaxometry can be useful in distinguishing CNS tuberculomas from glioblastoma. R1 and R2 relaxation rates from core of the lesions are most important in differentiating the two with R1 value > 0.852 and R2 value > 11.565 from core strongly suggests tuberculoma over glioblastoma.

目的:合成磁共振成像(MRI)可以在较短的采集时间内,通过定量弛豫测量(纵向弛豫率[R1]、横向弛豫率[R2]和质子密度[PD]),从单次采集的多重延迟多重回波(MDME)序列中重建多个对比加权图像。我们试图探索基于合成磁共振弛豫仪的中枢神经系统(CNS)结核瘤与原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤如胶质母细胞瘤的鉴别。材料与方法:对10例中枢神经系统结核瘤和14例胶质母细胞瘤行造影前后合成MRI检查。R1、R2和PD值由病变核心、壁和病灶周围水肿计算,使用徒手感兴趣区域,并在两组之间进行比较。结果:在结核瘤中,对比前和对比后R1和R2松弛率均显著升高(对比前平均R1 - 0.93, R2 - 15.02;对比后R1 - 1.51, R2 - 15.48)(对比前平均R1 - 0.36, R2 - 4.58;对比后R1 - 0.43, R2 - 4.78)。胶质母细胞瘤的病灶周围水肿也有相同的数值(对比前平均R1 - 0.75, R2 - 9.9;对比后R1 - 0.78, R2 - 10.48)与结核瘤相比(对比前平均R1 - 0.68, R2 - 8.57;对比后R1 - 0.72, R2 - 8.67)。病变壁的松弛测量参数无明显差异。结论:合成磁共振弛豫仪可用于鉴别中枢神经系统结核瘤和胶质母细胞瘤。病灶核心区R1和R2松弛率是鉴别两者的最重要指标,核心区R1值> 0.852,R2值> 11.565强烈提示为结核瘤而非胶质母细胞瘤。
{"title":"Synthetic magnetic resonance-based relaxometry in differentiating central nervous system tuberculoma and glioblastoma.","authors":"Sanket Dash, Sameer Vyas, Chirag Kamal Ahuja, Paramjeet Singh, Sarfraj Ahmad","doi":"10.5114/pjr/202175","DOIUrl":"10.5114/pjr/202175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows reconstruction of multiple contrast-weighted images from a single acquisition of multiple delay multiple echo (MDME) sequence with quantitative relaxometry (longitudinal relaxation rate [R1], transverse relaxation rate [R2], and proton density [PD]) in a shorter acquisition time. We tried to explore synthetic MR-based relaxometry to differentiate central nervous system (CNS) tuberculomas from primary CNS neoplasm like glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten cases of CNS tuberculoma and 14 cases of glioblastoma underwent pre- and post-contrast synthetic MRI. R1, R2, and PD values were calculated from lesion core, wall, and perilesional oedema using free-hand region of interest and compared across the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both pre- and post-contrast R1 and R2 relaxation rates from core were significantly higher in tuberculoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.93, R2 - 15.02; post-contrast R1 - 1.51, R2 - 15.48) from glioblastoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.36, R2 - 4.58; post-contrast R1 - 0.43, R2 - 4.78). The same values were higher in perilesional oedema of glioblastoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.75, R2 - 9.9; post-contrast R1 - 0.78, R2 - 10.48) compared to tuberculoma (mean pre-contrast R1 - 0.68, R2 - 8.57; post-contrast R1 - 0.72, R2 - 8.67). No significant difference was seen between relaxometry parameters from the walls of lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synthetic MR-based relaxometry can be useful in distinguishing CNS tuberculomas from glioblastoma. R1 and R2 relaxation rates from core of the lesions are most important in differentiating the two with R1 value > 0.852 and R2 value > 11.565 from core strongly suggests tuberculoma over glioblastoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e198-e206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099202/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endovascular stenting for extracranial internal carotid artery dissection - single-centre experience and literature overview. 颅内外颈内动脉夹层血管内支架置入术-单中心经验和文献综述。
Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/202103
Paweł Szmygin, Maciej Szmygin, Tomasz Roman, Piotr Luchowski, Tomasz Jargiełło, Radosław Rola

Purpose: Extracranial internal carotid artery dissections (EICAD) remain a relatively common cause of ischaemic events in young patients. Currently, there is no consensus on standardised use of endovascular therapy in the treatment of these patients, but available data suggest that conservative treatment is not sufficient in 15% of cases. The aim of our study was to evaluate if endovascular stent placement was safe and effective for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection, and whether it should be considered in properly selected patients.

Material and methods: This single-centre, retrospective study aimed to evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with EICAD who underwent endovascular stenting between 2015 and 2024. Procedural and clinical efficacy and safety, the rate of complications, and long-term outcomes were noted.

Results: A total of 21 patients (10 females) with an average age of 53 years underwent stenting for EICAD. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative complications were noted in 2 cases. Neurological evaluation performed at 6-month follow-up showed very good clinical results in the majority of cases (mRS 0 and mRS 1 were 76% and 19%, respectively). Control imaging examinations confirmed stent patency in all cases. No long-term mortality was observed.

Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated procedural and clinical safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting in patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. That is why endovascular therapy should be proposed to individuals with unsatisfactory response to medical treatment and in cases of disease progression.

目的:颅外颈内动脉夹层(EICAD)仍然是年轻患者缺血性事件的一个相对常见的原因。目前,在这些患者的治疗中,对血管内治疗的标准化使用尚未达成共识,但现有数据表明,在15%的病例中,保守治疗是不够的。我们的研究目的是评估血管内支架置入术治疗颅外颈内动脉夹层是否安全有效,以及在适当选择患者时是否应该考虑。材料和方法:这项单中心、回顾性研究旨在评估2015年至2024年间接受血管内支架植入术的EICAD患者的手术和临床结果。观察了手术和临床的有效性和安全性、并发症发生率和长期预后。结果:共有21例患者(10例女性)接受了EICAD支架置入,平均年龄53岁。在所有情况下都取得了技术上的成功。2例出现围手术期并发症。6个月随访时进行的神经学评估显示,大多数病例的临床结果非常好(mRS 0和mRS 1分别为76%和19%)。对照影像学检查均证实支架通畅。未观察到长期死亡率。结论:本回顾性研究证实了颅内外颈内动脉夹层患者血管内支架植入术的程序和临床安全性和有效性。这就是为什么血管内治疗应该建议对药物治疗反应不满意的个体和疾病进展的情况下。
{"title":"Endovascular stenting for extracranial internal carotid artery dissection - single-centre experience and literature overview.","authors":"Paweł Szmygin, Maciej Szmygin, Tomasz Roman, Piotr Luchowski, Tomasz Jargiełło, Radosław Rola","doi":"10.5114/pjr/202103","DOIUrl":"10.5114/pjr/202103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Extracranial internal carotid artery dissections (EICAD) remain a relatively common cause of ischaemic events in young patients. Currently, there is no consensus on standardised use of endovascular therapy in the treatment of these patients, but available data suggest that conservative treatment is not sufficient in 15% of cases. The aim of our study was to evaluate if endovascular stent placement was safe and effective for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection, and whether it should be considered in properly selected patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study aimed to evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with EICAD who underwent endovascular stenting between 2015 and 2024. Procedural and clinical efficacy and safety, the rate of complications, and long-term outcomes were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 patients (10 females) with an average age of 53 years underwent stenting for EICAD. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative complications were noted in 2 cases. Neurological evaluation performed at 6-month follow-up showed very good clinical results in the majority of cases (mRS 0 and mRS 1 were 76% and 19%, respectively). Control imaging examinations confirmed stent patency in all cases. No long-term mortality was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective study demonstrated procedural and clinical safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting in patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. That is why endovascular therapy should be proposed to individuals with unsatisfactory response to medical treatment and in cases of disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e191-e197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099200/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Muscle involvement in Duchenne muscular dystrophy progresses differently, as shown by MRI and diffusion tensor imaging. MRI和弥散张量成像显示,杜氏肌营养不良的肌肉受累进展不同。
Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/201468
Josef Finsterer
{"title":"Muscle involvement in Duchenne muscular dystrophy progresses differently, as shown by MRI and diffusion tensor imaging.","authors":"Josef Finsterer","doi":"10.5114/pjr/201468","DOIUrl":"10.5114/pjr/201468","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e189-e190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099198/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reproducibility of MRI-derived radiomic features in prostate cancer detection: a methodological approach. 磁共振衍生放射学特征在前列腺癌检测中的可重复性:一种方法学方法。
Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/201467
Javad Zarei, Asma Soleimani, Marziyeh Tahmasbi, Mohsen Sarkarian, Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo

Purpose: We aim to evaluate the reproducibility of these features and apply machine learning algorithms to predict cancer diagnosis.

Material and methods: We analyzed magnetic resonance (MR) images from a cohort of 82 individuals, split between 41 prostate cancer patients and 41 healthy controls. A total of 215 radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted and ADC images using the Software Environment for Radiomic Analysis (SERA). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to assess the reproducibility of features, and Pearson's correlation was applied to remove redundant features. After feature selection, seven dimensionality reduction techniques, including principal component analysis (PCA), kernel PCA, linear discriminant analysis, and locally linear embedding, were applied to preprocess the radiomic features. Ten machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVM), random forests, neural networks, logistic regression, and ensemble methods such as CatBoost and AdaBoost, were utilized to classify cancerous versus non-cancerous tissues. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy and AUC-ROC metrics.

Results: The results showed that features with high reproducibility (ICC > 0.75) contributed significantly to the performance of machine learning models. SVM, neural networks, and logistic regression achieved the highest accuracy (0.88-0.9) and AUC (up to 0.93) when using features from the good and excellent reproducibility categories. PCA emerged as the most effective dimensionality reduction method, preserving the discriminative power of reproducible features across all models.

Conclusion: The results indicate that radiomic feature extraction from MR images, combined with dimensionality reduction and machine learning algorithms, provides a robust approach for prostate cancer diagnosis.

目的:我们旨在评估这些特征的可重复性,并应用机器学习算法来预测癌症诊断。材料和方法:我们分析了82个人的磁共振(MR)图像,其中41名前列腺癌患者和41名健康对照者。使用放射组学分析软件环境(SERA)从t2加权和ADC图像中提取215个放射组学特征。采用类内相关系数(Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)分析评价特征的再现性,采用Pearson相关剔除冗余特征。在特征选择后,采用主成分分析、核主成分分析、线性判别分析和局部线性嵌入等7种降维技术对辐射组学特征进行预处理。10种机器学习算法,包括支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林、神经网络、逻辑回归和集成方法(如CatBoost和AdaBoost),被用于对癌组织和非癌组织进行分类。使用准确性和AUC-ROC指标评估模型性能。结果:结果表明,具有高重现性(ICC > 0.75)的特征对机器学习模型的性能有显著贡献。当使用来自良好和优秀再现性类别的特征时,SVM、神经网络和逻辑回归获得了最高的准确性(0.88-0.9)和AUC(高达0.93)。PCA成为最有效的降维方法,保留了所有模型中可重复特征的判别能力。结论:磁共振图像放射特征提取,结合降维和机器学习算法,为前列腺癌诊断提供了一种可靠的方法。
{"title":"Reproducibility of MRI-derived radiomic features in prostate cancer detection: a methodological approach.","authors":"Javad Zarei, Asma Soleimani, Marziyeh Tahmasbi, Mohsen Sarkarian, Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo","doi":"10.5114/pjr/201467","DOIUrl":"10.5114/pjr/201467","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to evaluate the reproducibility of these features and apply machine learning algorithms to predict cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed magnetic resonance (MR) images from a cohort of 82 individuals, split between 41 prostate cancer patients and 41 healthy controls. A total of 215 radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted and ADC images using the Software Environment for Radiomic Analysis (SERA). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used to assess the reproducibility of features, and Pearson's correlation was applied to remove redundant features. After feature selection, seven dimensionality reduction techniques, including principal component analysis (PCA), kernel PCA, linear discriminant analysis, and locally linear embedding, were applied to preprocess the radiomic features. Ten machine learning algorithms, including support vector machines (SVM), random forests, neural networks, logistic regression, and ensemble methods such as CatBoost and AdaBoost, were utilized to classify cancerous versus non-cancerous tissues. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy and AUC-ROC metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that features with high reproducibility (ICC > 0.75) contributed significantly to the performance of machine learning models. SVM, neural networks, and logistic regression achieved the highest accuracy (0.88-0.9) and AUC (up to 0.93) when using features from the good and excellent reproducibility categories. PCA emerged as the most effective dimensionality reduction method, preserving the discriminative power of reproducible features across all models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that radiomic feature extraction from MR images, combined with dimensionality reduction and machine learning algorithms, provides a robust approach for prostate cancer diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e180-e188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099201/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the accuracy of artificial intelligence in mandibular canal segmentation compared to semi-automatic segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images. 评估人工智能在下颌管分割与半自动分割的准确性。
Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/202477
Julien Issa, Marta Dyszkiewicz Konwinska, Natalia Kazimierczak, Raphael Olszewski

Purpose: This study aims to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in mandibular canal (MC) segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to semi-automatic segmentation. The impact of third molar status (absent, erupted, impacted) on AI performance was also evaluated.

Material and methods: A total of 150 CBCT scans (300 MCs) were retrospectively analysed. Semi-automatic MC segmentation was performed by experts using Romexis software, serving as the reference standard. AI-based segmentation was conducted using Diagnocat, an AI-driven cloud-based platform. Three-dimensional segmentation accuracy was assessed by comparing AI and semi-automatic segmentations through surface-to-surface distance metrics in Cloud Compare software. Statistical analyses included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter- and intra-rater reliability, Kruskal-Wallis tests for group comparisons, and Mann-Whitney U tests for post-hoc analyses.

Results: The median deviation between AI and semi-automatic MC segmentation was 0.29 mm (SD: 0.25-0.37 mm), with 88% of cases within the clinically acceptable limit (≤ 0.50 mm). Inter-rater reliability for semi-automatic segmentation was 84.5%, while intra-rater reliability reached 95.5%. AI segmentation demonstrated the highest accuracy in scans without third molars (median deviation: 0.27 mm), followed by erupted third molars (0.28 mm) and impacted third molars (0.32 mm).

Conclusions: AI demonstrated high accuracy in MC segmentation, closely matching expert-guided semi-automatic segmentation. However, segmentation errors were more frequent in cases with impacted third molars, probably due to anatomical complexity. Further optimisation of AI models using diverse training datasets and multi-centre validation is recommended to enhance reliability in complex cases.

目的:本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)下颌管(MC)分割中与半自动分割的准确性。还评估了第三磨牙状态(缺失、爆发、影响)对人工智能性能的影响。材料和方法:回顾性分析共150个CBCT扫描(300个MCs)。由专家使用Romexis软件进行半自动MC分割,作为参考标准。使用人工智能驱动的云平台Diagnocat进行人工智能分割。通过Cloud Compare软件中的地对地距离度量,比较人工智能和半自动分割的三维分割精度。统计分析包括用类内相关系数(ICC)表示组间和组内信度,用Kruskal-Wallis检验表示组间比较,用Mann-Whitney U检验表示事后分析。结果:人工智能与半自动MC分割的中位偏差为0.29 mm (SD: 0.25 ~ 0.37 mm), 88%的病例在临床可接受范围内(≤0.50 mm)。半自动分割的评分间信度为84.5%,评分内信度为95.5%。人工智能分割在没有第三磨牙的扫描中显示出最高的准确性(中位数偏差:0.27 mm),其次是爆发的第三磨牙(0.28 mm)和阻生的第三磨牙(0.32 mm)。结论:人工智能在MC分割中具有较高的准确率,与专家引导的半自动分割非常接近。然而,可能由于第三磨牙的解剖复杂性,第三磨牙的分割错误更常见。建议使用不同的训练数据集和多中心验证进一步优化人工智能模型,以提高复杂情况下的可靠性。
{"title":"Assessing the accuracy of artificial intelligence in mandibular canal segmentation compared to semi-automatic segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images.","authors":"Julien Issa, Marta Dyszkiewicz Konwinska, Natalia Kazimierczak, Raphael Olszewski","doi":"10.5114/pjr/202477","DOIUrl":"10.5114/pjr/202477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in mandibular canal (MC) segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to semi-automatic segmentation. The impact of third molar status (absent, erupted, impacted) on AI performance was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 150 CBCT scans (300 MCs) were retrospectively analysed. Semi-automatic MC segmentation was performed by experts using Romexis software, serving as the reference standard. AI-based segmentation was conducted using Diagnocat, an AI-driven cloud-based platform. Three-dimensional segmentation accuracy was assessed by comparing AI and semi-automatic segmentations through surface-to-surface distance metrics in Cloud Compare software. Statistical analyses included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter- and intra-rater reliability, Kruskal-Wallis tests for group comparisons, and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests for post-hoc analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median deviation between AI and semi-automatic MC segmentation was 0.29 mm (SD: 0.25-0.37 mm), with 88% of cases within the clinically acceptable limit (≤ 0.50 mm). Inter-rater reliability for semi-automatic segmentation was 84.5%, while intra-rater reliability reached 95.5%. AI segmentation demonstrated the highest accuracy in scans without third molars (median deviation: 0.27 mm), followed by erupted third molars (0.28 mm) and impacted third molars (0.32 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI demonstrated high accuracy in MC segmentation, closely matching expert-guided semi-automatic segmentation. However, segmentation errors were more frequent in cases with impacted third molars, probably due to anatomical complexity. Further optimisation of AI models using diverse training datasets and multi-centre validation is recommended to enhance reliability in complex cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e172-e179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099203/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should routine β-hCG testing be performed before computed tomography scans in women of childbearing age? 育龄妇女应在计算机断层扫描前进行β-hCG常规检测吗?
Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/201327
Olga Bayar-Kapici
{"title":"Should routine β-hCG testing be performed before computed tomography scans in women of childbearing age?","authors":"Olga Bayar-Kapici","doi":"10.5114/pjr/201327","DOIUrl":"10.5114/pjr/201327","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e170-e171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099204/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Imaging of spinal and central nervous system brucellosis: a review. 脊柱和中枢神经系统布鲁氏菌病的影像学研究进展。
Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/200911
Sebastian Lipka, Radosław Zawadzki, Zeynep Gamze Kilicoglu, Joanna Zajkowska, Urszula Łebkowska, Bożena Kubas

Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by Gram-negative bacteria of the Brucella genus that can be acquired through contact with a contaminated animal or its secretions. The course of the disease can be acute, chronic, or persistent. Axial skeleton and central nervous system (CNS) are among the most common affected locations and may be involved in each of the forms. Due to the varying clinical picture of the disease, diagnosis is made mainly on the basis of laboratory examinations that detect specific IgM and IgG antibodies in blood or other biological material and/or cultures. Imaging methods, especially magnetic resonance imaging, can aid in establishing proper diagnosis, monitoring of the disease and, to some extent, enable differential diagnosis before obtaining the laboratory tests results. The aim of this review is to present imaging features of Brucella infection of the spine and CNS and provide the recent advancements in the field.

布鲁氏菌病是一种由布鲁氏菌属革兰氏阴性菌引起的人畜共患疾病,可通过接触受污染的动物或其分泌物而获得。病程可分为急性、慢性或持续性。轴向骨骼和中枢神经系统(CNS)是最常见的受累部位,可能涉及每种形式。由于该病的临床表现各不相同,诊断主要基于实验室检查,即在血液或其他生物材料和/或培养物中检测特异性IgM和IgG抗体。成像方法,特别是磁共振成像,可以帮助建立正确的诊断,监测疾病,并在某种程度上能够在获得实验室检查结果之前进行鉴别诊断。本文综述的目的是介绍脊柱和中枢神经系统布鲁氏菌感染的影像学特征,并提供该领域的最新进展。
{"title":"Imaging of spinal and central nervous system brucellosis: a review.","authors":"Sebastian Lipka, Radosław Zawadzki, Zeynep Gamze Kilicoglu, Joanna Zajkowska, Urszula Łebkowska, Bożena Kubas","doi":"10.5114/pjr/200911","DOIUrl":"10.5114/pjr/200911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by Gram-negative bacteria of the <i>Brucella</i> genus that can be acquired through contact with a contaminated animal or its secretions. The course of the disease can be acute, chronic, or persistent. Axial skeleton and central nervous system (CNS) are among the most common affected locations and may be involved in each of the forms. Due to the varying clinical picture of the disease, diagnosis is made mainly on the basis of laboratory examinations that detect specific IgM and IgG antibodies in blood or other biological material and/or cultures. Imaging methods, especially magnetic resonance imaging, can aid in establishing proper diagnosis, monitoring of the disease and, to some extent, enable differential diagnosis before obtaining the laboratory tests results. The aim of this review is to present imaging features of <i>Brucella</i> infection of the spine and CNS and provide the recent advancements in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e161-e169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099199/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144145170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of image quality of split-bolus computed tomography versus dual-phase computed tomography in abdominal trauma. 腹部创伤分丸ct与双期ct图像质量的比较。
Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/200756
Shubham Gautam, Anuradha Sharma, Charu Paruthi, Rohini Gupta Ghasi, Krishna Bhardwaj

Purpose: To compare the image quality in single-pass split-bolus abdominal computed tomography (CT) and conventional biphasic CT in abdominal trauma patients.

Material and methods: Sixty-six consecutive abdominal trauma patients referred for CT were randomised into 2 groups: the study group (n = 33), scanned using the split-bolus technique; and the control group (n = 33), scanned using the conventional biphasic technique. CT image quality was analysed subjectively by 2 observers based on a 5-point Likert scale. The images were also analysed quantitatively for attenuation values achieved by region of interest (ROI) placements in major arteries, veins, and solid organs. In addition, the radiation dose in terms of the dose length product (DLP) was compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The image quality in both groups ranged from good to excellent in most cases. There was no statistically significant difference in subjective image quality in both the groups as assessed by Likert score. Attenuation values in solid organs and major venous structures were significantly higher in the split-bolus group (p < 0.001). Arterial attenuation values were significantly higher in the control group (p < 0.001), but diagnostic levels were achieved in all patients. There was a reduction of 31.1% in DLP in the split-bolus group.

Conclusions: The split-bolus technique offers comparable image quality and higher solid organ and venous enhancement than conventional biphasic protocol at a reduced radiation dose.

目的:比较腹部创伤患者单次分丸式CT与常规双相CT的图像质量。材料与方法:66例连续行CT检查的腹部外伤患者随机分为两组:研究组(n = 33),采用裂丸技术进行扫描;对照组(33例)采用常规双相扫描技术。CT图像质量由2名观察员根据5点李克特量表进行主观分析。图像还定量分析了在大动脉、静脉和实体器官中通过感兴趣区域(ROI)放置获得的衰减值。并比较两组间以剂量长度积(DLP)表示的辐射剂量。结果:在大多数情况下,两组的图像质量从良好到优秀不等。两组的主观图像质量通过李克特评分评估无统计学差异。固体器官和主要静脉结构的衰减值在分丸组明显更高(p < 0.001)。对照组动脉衰减值明显高于对照组(p < 0.001),但所有患者均达到诊断水平。分丸组DLP降低31.1%。结论:在降低辐射剂量的情况下,与传统的双相方案相比,分丸技术提供了相当的图像质量和更高的实体器官和静脉增强。
{"title":"Comparison of image quality of split-bolus computed tomography versus dual-phase computed tomography in abdominal trauma.","authors":"Shubham Gautam, Anuradha Sharma, Charu Paruthi, Rohini Gupta Ghasi, Krishna Bhardwaj","doi":"10.5114/pjr/200756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/200756","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the image quality in single-pass split-bolus abdominal computed tomography (CT) and conventional biphasic CT in abdominal trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixty-six consecutive abdominal trauma patients referred for CT were randomised into 2 groups: the study group (<i>n</i> = 33), scanned using the split-bolus technique; and the control group (<i>n</i> = 33), scanned using the conventional biphasic technique. CT image quality was analysed subjectively by 2 observers based on a 5-point Likert scale. The images were also analysed quantitatively for attenuation values achieved by region of interest (ROI) placements in major arteries, veins, and solid organs. In addition, the radiation dose in terms of the dose length product (DLP) was compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The image quality in both groups ranged from good to excellent in most cases. There was no statistically significant difference in subjective image quality in both the groups as assessed by Likert score. Attenuation values in solid organs and major venous structures were significantly higher in the split-bolus group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Arterial attenuation values were significantly higher in the control group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), but diagnostic levels were achieved in all patients. There was a reduction of 31.1% in DLP in the split-bolus group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The split-bolus technique offers comparable image quality and higher solid organ and venous enhancement than conventional biphasic protocol at a reduced radiation dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e151-e160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144058501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Computed tomography radiomics combined with clinical parameters for hepatocellular carcinoma differentiation: a machine learning investigation. 计算机断层放射组学与肝细胞癌分化的临床参数相结合:一项机器学习研究。
Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/200631
Shijing Ma, Yingying Zhu, Changhong Pu, Jin Li, Bin Zhong

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a combined clinical-radiomics model using multiple machine learning approaches for predicting pathological differentiation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Material and methods: A total of 196 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC, who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled (training: n = 156; validation: n = 40). The modelling process included the folowing: (1) clinical model construction through logistic regression analysis of risk factors; (2) radiomics model development by comparing 6 machine learning classifiers; and (3) integration of optimal clinical and radiomic features into a combined model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed for clinical implementation.

Results: Two clinical risk factors (BMI and CA153) were identified as independent predictors of differentiated HCC. The clinical model showed moderate performance (AUC: training = 0.705, validation = 0.658). The radiomics model demonstrated improved prediction capability (AUC: training = 0.840, validation = 0.716). The combined model achieved the best performance in differentiating HCC pathological grades (AUC: training = 0.878, validation = 0.747).

Conclusions: The integration of CT radiomics features with clinical parameters through machine learning provides a promising non-invasive approach for predicting HCC pathological differentiation. This combined model could serve as a valuable tool for preoperative treatment planning.

目的:评估使用多种机器学习方法预测肝细胞癌(HCC)病理分化的临床-放射组学联合模型的性能。材料和方法:回顾性纳入196例经病理证实的HCC患者,术前行CT检查(training: n = 156;验证:n = 40)。建模过程包括:(1)通过危险因素的logistic回归分析构建临床模型;(2)通过比较6种机器学习分类器建立放射组学模型;(3)将最佳临床和放射学特征整合到一个组合模型中。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能。构建了临床应用的nomogram。结果:两个临床危险因素(BMI和CA153)被确定为分化型HCC的独立预测因素。临床模型表现中等(AUC: training = 0.705, validation = 0.658)。放射组学模型具有较好的预测能力(AUC: training = 0.840, validation = 0.716)。联合模型对HCC病理分级的鉴别效果最佳(AUC: training = 0.878, validation = 0.747)。结论:通过机器学习将CT放射组学特征与临床参数相结合,为HCC病理分化预测提供了一种有前景的无创方法。该组合模型可作为术前治疗计划的重要工具。
{"title":"Computed tomography radiomics combined with clinical parameters for hepatocellular carcinoma differentiation: a machine learning investigation.","authors":"Shijing Ma, Yingying Zhu, Changhong Pu, Jin Li, Bin Zhong","doi":"10.5114/pjr/200631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/200631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of a combined clinical-radiomics model using multiple machine learning approaches for predicting pathological differentiation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 196 patients with pathologically confirmed HCC, who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled (training: <i>n</i> = 156; validation: <i>n</i> = 40). The modelling process included the folowing: (1) clinical model construction through logistic regression analysis of risk factors; (2) radiomics model development by comparing 6 machine learning classifiers; and (3) integration of optimal clinical and radiomic features into a combined model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed for clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two clinical risk factors (BMI and CA153) were identified as independent predictors of differentiated HCC. The clinical model showed moderate performance (AUC: training = 0.705, validation = 0.658). The radiomics model demonstrated improved prediction capability (AUC: training = 0.840, validation = 0.716). The combined model achieved the best performance in differentiating HCC pathological grades (AUC: training = 0.878, validation = 0.747).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integration of CT radiomics features with clinical parameters through machine learning provides a promising non-invasive approach for predicting HCC pathological differentiation. This combined model could serve as a valuable tool for preoperative treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e140-e150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144049878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to "Neurocysticercosis: unwinding the radiological conundrum" by Goddu Govindappa SK et al. 回复Goddu Govindappa SK等人的“神经囊虫病:解开放射学难题”。
Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.5114/pjr/200627
Venkatraman Indiran
{"title":"Reply to \"Neurocysticercosis: unwinding the radiological conundrum\" by Goddu Govindappa SK <i>et al</i>.","authors":"Venkatraman Indiran","doi":"10.5114/pjr/200627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/200627","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e138-e139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049154/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144030244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Polish journal of radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1