Pub Date : 2025-08-07DOI: 10.1177/15347346251365832
Federico Rolando Bonanni, Marco Meloni, Martina Salvi, Ermanno Bellizzi, Aurora Buccolini, Luigi Uccioli, Valeria Ruotolo, Aikaterini Andreadi, Alfonso Bellia, Davide Lauro
The study aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of patients admitted for a diabetic foot attack (DFA). It is a retrospective observational study including a population of patients admitted for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) into a specialized multidisciplinary diabetic foot service. Based on the type of hospital admission (emergency or elective), patients were divided into two groups: those with DFA and those without DFA (chronic diabetic foot, CDF). The DFA was considered in case of ischemia (acute or chronic), infection and Charcot foot requiring urgent hospitalization. Once discharged, patients were regularly followed as outpatients with the following six-month outcomes: healing; major amputation; mortality; hospital readmission; non-fatal major adverse limb and cardiovascular events (MALCE) including nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, and limb ischemia requiring revascularization. Overall, 141 patients were included. The mean age was 70 ± 12 years, most patients were male (76.6%) and had type 2 diabetes (93.6%) with a mean duration of 22 ± 13 years; 81 (57.4%) patients presented DFA while 60 (42.6%) presented CDF. No cases of admitted Charcot foot were recorded. The DFA group reported 81.5% cases of severe/moderate infections, while the CDF group presented 50% of mild infections. The DFA group reported higher HbA1c values (67 ± 22 vs 56 ± 14 mmol/mol, p = 0.0008) and more cases of first assessment for DFUs (59.3 vs 13.3%, p < 0.0001) when compared to the CDF group. The six-month follow-up outcomes for DFA and CDF were: healing (65.4 vs 60.0%, p = 0.3); major amputation (4.9 vs 1.7%, p = 0.2); mortality (8.6 vs 11.7%, p = 0.5); hospital readmission (27.2 vs 26.7%, p = 0.8); non-fatal MALCE (9.9 vs 23.3%, p = 0.1). Six-month outcomes did not show significant differences between the DFA and CDF groups in terms of healing, major amputation, mortality, readmission, and non-fatal MALCE. Adequate management of DFA seems to ensure favourable mid-term outcomes, even if compared to patients with CDF.
该研究旨在评估因糖尿病足发作(DFA)入院患者的中期预后。这是一项回顾性观察性研究,包括一群因糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)进入专门的多学科糖尿病足服务的患者。根据住院类型(急诊或择期),将患者分为两组:有DFA的患者和无DFA的患者(慢性糖尿病足,CDF)。在缺血(急性或慢性)、感染和沙科足需要紧急住院的情况下,考虑DFA。出院后,患者作为门诊患者定期随访,六个月的结果如下:愈合;主要截肢;死亡率;再次入院;非致死性重大肢体和心血管不良事件(MALCE),包括非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、非致死性中风和需要血运重建的肢体缺血。总共纳入141例患者。平均年龄70±12岁,男性占76.6%,2型糖尿病占93.6%,平均病程22±13年;DFA 81例(57.4%),CDF 60例(42.6%)。没有确诊的夏可足病例记录。DFA组报告了81.5%的重度/中度感染病例,而CDF组报告了50%的轻度感染病例。DFA组报告了更高的HbA1c值(67±22 vs 56±14 mmol/mol, p = 0.0008)和更多的DFA首次评估病例(59.3 vs 13.3%, p = 0.0008)
{"title":"Six-month Outcomes of Patients Admitted for Diabetic Foot Attack.","authors":"Federico Rolando Bonanni, Marco Meloni, Martina Salvi, Ermanno Bellizzi, Aurora Buccolini, Luigi Uccioli, Valeria Ruotolo, Aikaterini Andreadi, Alfonso Bellia, Davide Lauro","doi":"10.1177/15347346251365832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251365832","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of patients admitted for a diabetic foot attack (DFA). It is a retrospective observational study including a population of patients admitted for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) into a specialized multidisciplinary diabetic foot service. Based on the type of hospital admission (emergency or elective), patients were divided into two groups: those with DFA and those without DFA (chronic diabetic foot, CDF). The DFA was considered in case of ischemia (acute or chronic), infection and Charcot foot requiring urgent hospitalization. Once discharged, patients were regularly followed as outpatients with the following six-month outcomes: healing; major amputation; mortality; hospital readmission; non-fatal major adverse limb and cardiovascular events (MALCE) including nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, and limb ischemia requiring revascularization. Overall, 141 patients were included. The mean age was 70 ± 12 years, most patients were male (76.6%) and had type 2 diabetes (93.6%) with a mean duration of 22 ± 13 years; 81 (57.4%) patients presented DFA while 60 (42.6%) presented CDF. No cases of admitted Charcot foot were recorded. The DFA group reported 81.5% cases of severe/moderate infections, while the CDF group presented 50% of mild infections. The DFA group reported higher HbA1c values (67 ± 22 vs 56 ± 14 mmol/mol, p = 0.0008) and more cases of first assessment for DFUs (59.3 vs 13.3%, p < 0.0001) when compared to the CDF group. The six-month follow-up outcomes for DFA and CDF were: healing (65.4 vs 60.0%, p = 0.3); major amputation (4.9 vs 1.7%, p = 0.2); mortality (8.6 vs 11.7%, p = 0.5); hospital readmission (27.2 vs 26.7%, p = 0.8); non-fatal MALCE (9.9 vs 23.3%, p = 0.1). Six-month outcomes did not show significant differences between the DFA and CDF groups in terms of healing, major amputation, mortality, readmission, and non-fatal MALCE. Adequate management of DFA seems to ensure favourable mid-term outcomes, even if compared to patients with CDF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251365832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-07DOI: 10.1177/15347346251363536
Prashanth R J Vas, Stella Papachristou, Michael E Edmonds, Nikolaos Papanas
Length-dependent distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) represents a highly prevalent complication associated with diabetes. Current standards for clinical diagnosis, severity assessment, and comprehensive staging of DSPN remain ambiguous. Numerous guidelines advocate for a qualitative evaluation of DSPN, primarily to identify loss of protective sensation (LOPS), without clearly enunciating its temporal importance. This approach has resulted in a lack of recognition of the earlier stages of DSPN within diabetes clinics. Our objective has been to establish a straightforward staging system for DSPN, taking into consideration the temporal trends in the pathogenesis of the condition. We categorise DSPN into five stages: Stage 1 represents absence of evident neuronal disease; Stage 2 involves small fibre changes with or without associated symptoms; Stage 3 comprises large fibre changes, with or without associated symptoms; Stage 4 denotes advanced DSPN characterised by LOPS; and Stage 5 includes LOPS with either a current or past history of neuropathic foot ulceration. We believe that this system may enable appropriate risk screening and significantly stratify DSPN, ideally enhancing the organisation of diabetic foot care through suitable counselling and referral.
{"title":"A New, Simple, Pragmatic Clinical Staging of Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in Diabetes: Will it Improve Organisation of Diabetic Foot Care?","authors":"Prashanth R J Vas, Stella Papachristou, Michael E Edmonds, Nikolaos Papanas","doi":"10.1177/15347346251363536","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251363536","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Length-dependent distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN) represents a highly prevalent complication associated with diabetes. Current standards for clinical diagnosis, severity assessment, and comprehensive staging of DSPN remain ambiguous. Numerous guidelines advocate for a qualitative evaluation of DSPN, primarily to identify loss of protective sensation (LOPS), without clearly enunciating its temporal importance. This approach has resulted in a lack of recognition of the earlier stages of DSPN within diabetes clinics. Our objective has been to establish a straightforward staging system for DSPN, taking into consideration the temporal trends in the pathogenesis of the condition. We categorise DSPN into five stages: Stage 1 represents absence of evident neuronal disease; Stage 2 involves small fibre changes with or without associated symptoms; Stage 3 comprises large fibre changes, with or without associated symptoms; Stage 4 denotes advanced DSPN characterised by LOPS; and Stage 5 includes LOPS with either a current or past history of neuropathic foot ulceration. We believe that this system may enable appropriate risk screening and significantly stratify DSPN, ideally enhancing the organisation of diabetic foot care through suitable counselling and referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251363536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-17DOI: 10.1177/15347346251359067
He Yi, Ruijue Li, Cuixian Li
AimsBurn injuries cause significant mortality, morbidity, and financial and psychological burdens for patients and families. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown some benefits in burn wound healing, but its efficacy is unproven. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate PRP's effects on burn wounds.MethodA comprehensive search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted until January 22, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PRP's effect on burn wounds. The mean difference (MD), standardized MD (SMD), or odds ratio (OR) of the studies was calculated.ResultsNine RCTs with 413 participants were included. PRP significantly reduced wound healing time (MD: -6.68 days, 95% CI (-10.96, -2.39)), wound infection incidence (OR: 0.18, 95% CI (0.04, 0.88)), and dressing change frequency (MD: -14.50 times, 95% CI (-16.45, -12.55)). There was a significant increase in the healed area percentage in the intervention group (MD: 6.82%, 95% CI (2.58, 11.06)). However, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in pain score or graft take percentage.ConclusionsThis review shows that PRP enhances wound healing and reduces adverse events like wound infection in burn patients. Future studies should further explore PRP's effects to support its broader clinical use.
{"title":"Platelet-rich Plasma for the Management of Burn Wound: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"He Yi, Ruijue Li, Cuixian Li","doi":"10.1177/15347346251359067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251359067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimsBurn injuries cause significant mortality, morbidity, and financial and psychological burdens for patients and families. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown some benefits in burn wound healing, but its efficacy is unproven. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate PRP's effects on burn wounds.MethodA comprehensive search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted until January 22, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PRP's effect on burn wounds. The mean difference (MD), standardized MD (SMD), or odds ratio (OR) of the studies was calculated.ResultsNine RCTs with 413 participants were included. PRP significantly reduced wound healing time (MD: -6.68 days, 95% CI (-10.96, -2.39)), wound infection incidence (OR: 0.18, 95% CI (0.04, 0.88)), and dressing change frequency (MD: -14.50 times, 95% CI (-16.45, -12.55)). There was a significant increase in the healed area percentage in the intervention group (MD: 6.82%, 95% CI (2.58, 11.06)). However, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in pain score or graft take percentage.ConclusionsThis review shows that PRP enhances wound healing and reduces adverse events like wound infection in burn patients. Future studies should further explore PRP's effects to support its broader clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251359067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144651694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-17DOI: 10.1177/15347346251356379
Fei Zhu, Mingjiang Liu, Liangdong Jiang, Linqi Li, Jie Yang, Rui Liu, Lihua Liu
This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the factors affecting the healing time of chronic refractory wounds, then establish a clinical prediction model and verify its performance. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 166 patients with chronic refractory wounds who met the inclusion criteria at a tertiary hospital in Changsha (from October 2021 to December 2023). The wound healing time was defined as the days of hospital stay until meeting the discharge standard. The collected information includes: diabetes status, average daily hospital expenses, wound type, admission route, availability of medical insurance, age, gender, education level, average daily dressing changes during hospitalization, smoking status, blood platelet level at admission, albumin level at admission, hemoglobin level at admission, creatinine level at admission, and prothrombin time. Then, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors affecting the healing time. Subsequently, a risk prediction model was constructed in the form of nomogram based on the risk factors identified, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the prediction performance and calibration of the model. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicate that the factors affecting the healing time of chronic refractory wounds include male gender (OR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.03-7.93, P < .05), diabetes history (OR: 4.05, 95% CI: 1.11-14.85, P < .05), reduced average daily dressing changes during hospitalization (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.96, P < .05), elevated blood platelet level (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01, P < .05), lowered albumin level (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97, P < .05), lowered hemoglobin level (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00, P < .05), and lowered creatinine level (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99-1.00, P < .05). The ROC curve shows that the area under the curve (AUC) of the model is 0.761, indicating good prediction. The DCA curve suggests good clinical applicability.
本研究旨在综合分析影响慢性难治性创面愈合时间的因素,建立临床预测模型并验证其性能。回顾性分析长沙市某三级医院2021年10月至2023年12月期间符合入选标准的166例慢性难治性伤口患者的临床资料。伤口愈合时间定义为达到出院标准的住院天数。收集的信息包括:糖尿病状况、平均每日住院费用、伤口类型、入院途径、是否有医疗保险、年龄、性别、教育程度、住院期间平均每日换药次数、吸烟状况、入院时血小板水平、入院时白蛋白水平、入院时血红蛋白水平、入院时肌酐水平、凝血酶原时间。通过单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,探讨影响愈合时间的危险因素。随后,根据识别出的风险因素,以nomogram形式构建风险预测模型,并利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型的预测性能进行评价和校正。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,影响慢性难治性创面愈合时间的因素包括男性(OR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.03 ~ 7.93, P P P P P P P P P P P P P P)
{"title":"Analysis of Factors Affecting the Healing Time of Chronic Refractory Wounds and Construction of a Prediction Model.","authors":"Fei Zhu, Mingjiang Liu, Liangdong Jiang, Linqi Li, Jie Yang, Rui Liu, Lihua Liu","doi":"10.1177/15347346251356379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251356379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the factors affecting the healing time of chronic refractory wounds, then establish a clinical prediction model and verify its performance. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 166 patients with chronic refractory wounds who met the inclusion criteria at a tertiary hospital in Changsha (from October 2021 to December 2023). The wound healing time was defined as the days of hospital stay until meeting the discharge standard. The collected information includes: diabetes status, average daily hospital expenses, wound type, admission route, availability of medical insurance, age, gender, education level, average daily dressing changes during hospitalization, smoking status, blood platelet level at admission, albumin level at admission, hemoglobin level at admission, creatinine level at admission, and prothrombin time. Then, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors affecting the healing time. Subsequently, a risk prediction model was constructed in the form of nomogram based on the risk factors identified, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the prediction performance and calibration of the model. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicate that the factors affecting the healing time of chronic refractory wounds include male gender (OR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.03-7.93, <i>P</i> < .05), diabetes history (OR: 4.05, 95% CI: 1.11-14.85, <i>P</i> < .05), reduced average daily dressing changes during hospitalization (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.96, <i>P</i> < .05), elevated blood platelet level (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01, <i>P</i> < .05), lowered albumin level (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97, <i>P</i> < .05), lowered hemoglobin level (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00, <i>P</i> < .05), and lowered creatinine level (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99-1.00, <i>P</i> < .05). The ROC curve shows that the area under the curve (AUC) of the model is 0.761, indicating good prediction. The DCA curve suggests good clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251356379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144651693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-15DOI: 10.1177/15347346251353672
Rahim Mohammadi, Seyede Soraya Mahmoudi, Fateme Sabti, Dara Azizi, Behdad Beheshti, Mostafa Kami, Ali Abbasi
Wound healing consists of inflammatory, proliferation and remodeling phases. The objective of the current study was to investigate the effect of β-Cryptoxanthin on wound healing. Thirty healthy adult male Wistar rats were randomized into three groups of ten animals each (5 for excisional and 5 for incisional wound model): (1) SHAM group with only wound creation. (2) OINTMENT group: As a control group with wound creation as well as 5 g ointment (Vaseline/ Eucerin) administered locally to the wound bed. (3) BCX group: As a treatment group with wound creation as well as 5 g ointment (Vaseline/ Eucerin) containing β-Cryptoxanthin (25 mg/g ointment) administered locally to the wound bed. An incisional wound model was used for biomechanical studies, while an excisional wound model was used for biochemical, histopathological, and planimetric assessments. The wound area was significantly reduced in the BCX group compared to other groups (P> .05). Biomechanical indices from the BCX group were significantly improved compared to other experimental groups (P> .05). Biochemical and quantitative histopathological analyses revealed a significant difference between BCX and other groups (P> .05). β-Cryptoxanthin showed the potential to improve wound healing significantly. This appeared to work by angiogenesis stimulation, fibroblast proliferation, inflammation reduction, and granulation tissue formation during the initial stages of the healing process. This accelerated healing led to earlier wound area reduction and enhanced tensile strength of the damaged area due to the reorganization of granulation tissue and collagen fibers.
{"title":"Effect of β-Cryptoxanthin on Healing of Excisional and Incisional Wounds in Rat: An Animal Model Study.","authors":"Rahim Mohammadi, Seyede Soraya Mahmoudi, Fateme Sabti, Dara Azizi, Behdad Beheshti, Mostafa Kami, Ali Abbasi","doi":"10.1177/15347346251353672","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251353672","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wound healing consists of inflammatory, proliferation and remodeling phases. The objective of the current study was to investigate the effect of β-Cryptoxanthin on wound healing. Thirty healthy adult male Wistar rats were randomized into three groups of ten animals each (5 for excisional and 5 for incisional wound model): (1) SHAM group with only wound creation. (2) OINTMENT group: As a control group with wound creation as well as 5 g ointment (Vaseline/ Eucerin) administered locally to the wound bed. (3) BCX group: As a treatment group with wound creation as well as 5 g ointment (Vaseline/ Eucerin) containing β-Cryptoxanthin (25 mg/g ointment) administered locally to the wound bed. An incisional wound model was used for biomechanical studies, while an excisional wound model was used for biochemical, histopathological, and planimetric assessments. The wound area was significantly reduced in the BCX group compared to other groups (<i>P</i> <i>></i> .05). Biomechanical indices from the BCX group were significantly improved compared to other experimental groups (<i>P</i> <i>></i> .05). Biochemical and quantitative histopathological analyses revealed a significant difference between BCX and other groups (<i>P</i> <i>></i> .05). β-Cryptoxanthin showed the potential to improve wound healing significantly. This appeared to work by angiogenesis stimulation, fibroblast proliferation, inflammation reduction, and granulation tissue formation during the initial stages of the healing process. This accelerated healing led to earlier wound area reduction and enhanced tensile strength of the damaged area due to the reorganization of granulation tissue and collagen fibers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251353672"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144639176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious and common complication of diabetes mellitus, contributing substantially to patient morbidity, reduced quality of life, and healthcare costs. Accumulating evidence highlights the potential benefits of exercise across various stages of DFUs. This review summarises current evidence on the role of exercise in DFUs management and emphasises the need for well-designed clinical trials to inform future rehabilitation guidelines. Exercise has been shown to improve glycaemic control, promote cardiovascular health, ameliorate neuropathic symptoms, and improve well-being. Importantly, appropriately selected and supervised physical activity may be safely implemented before ulcer onset, during the active ulceration phase, and following wound healing. Data show that exercise provides stage-specific benefits in DFUs by improving risk factors, reducing plantar pressures and foot pain prior to ulceration; enhancing wound healing as adjunctive therapy during ulceration; and lowering the risk of recurrence in the post-healing period. However, current research is limited by heterogeneity in exercise protocols, lack of consensus on training parameters, and exclusion of high-risk populations from trials.
{"title":"To Train or not to Train: Exercise in Diabetic Foot Ulceration. A Brief Narrative Review.","authors":"Dimitrios Pantazopoulos, Evanthia Gouveri, Dimitrios Papazoglou, Nikolaos Papanas","doi":"10.1177/15347346251356862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251356862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious and common complication of diabetes mellitus, contributing substantially to patient morbidity, reduced quality of life, and healthcare costs. Accumulating evidence highlights the potential benefits of exercise across various stages of DFUs. This review summarises current evidence on the role of exercise in DFUs management and emphasises the need for well-designed clinical trials to inform future rehabilitation guidelines. Exercise has been shown to improve glycaemic control, promote cardiovascular health, ameliorate neuropathic symptoms, and improve well-being. Importantly, appropriately selected and supervised physical activity may be safely implemented before ulcer onset, during the active ulceration phase, and following wound healing. Data show that exercise provides stage-specific benefits in DFUs by improving risk factors, reducing plantar pressures and foot pain prior to ulceration; enhancing wound healing as adjunctive therapy during ulceration; and lowering the risk of recurrence in the post-healing period. However, current research is limited by heterogeneity in exercise protocols, lack of consensus on training parameters, and exclusion of high-risk populations from trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251356862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144593252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-09DOI: 10.1177/15347346251356857
Edoardo Pasqui, Greta Ferraro, Elisa Lazzeri, Cecilia Molino, Bruno Gargiulo, Leonardo Pasquetti, Gianmarco de Donato
PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cadaveric skin and dermal grafts from skin banks in the management of hard-to-heal wounds (HHWs), particularly of vascular etiology, in a frail patient population.MethodsThis prospective, single-center study enrolled 48 patients with HHWs unresponsive to conventional care. Patients underwent vascular assessment, revascularisation if indicated, and wound bed preparation prior to application of cryopreserved, glycerol-preserved, or lyophilized cadaveric grafts. Outcomes were assessed at predefined intervals up to 10.5 months.ResultsA total of 48 patients were enrolled. Arterial etiology was the most prevalent (33 patients, 68.7%). Complete wound healing was achieved in 47.9% of patients, with a mean time to re-epithelialization of 106.6 days. Limb salvage was attained in 97.9% of cases. Significant pain reduction was observed, with VAS scores dropping from 6.8 ± 1.9 at baseline to 1.5 ± 2.7 at six months (p < 0.0001). The Falanga A wound bed category increased from 42.5% at baseline to 84% at 6 months, and infection rates declined from 42.5% to <12% during follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed superior healing outcomes among arterial HHWs compared to non-arterial HHWs (p < 0.05).ConclusionCadaveric skin bank bioproducts offer an effective and safe option for the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds, particularly in patients with vascular disease. In this cohort, the approach led to a high rate of complete healing and limb salvage with significant pain reduction and enhanced wound bed quality. These results highlight the therapeutic value of allografts when used as part of an integrated protocol that includes revascularisation and meticulous wound bed preparation.
{"title":"Advanced Wound Healing with Cadaveric Grafts in Ischemic and Complex Wound: A Single Centre Experience.","authors":"Edoardo Pasqui, Greta Ferraro, Elisa Lazzeri, Cecilia Molino, Bruno Gargiulo, Leonardo Pasquetti, Gianmarco de Donato","doi":"10.1177/15347346251356857","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251356857","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cadaveric skin and dermal grafts from skin banks in the management of hard-to-heal wounds (HHWs), particularly of vascular etiology, in a frail patient population.MethodsThis prospective, single-center study enrolled 48 patients with HHWs unresponsive to conventional care. Patients underwent vascular assessment, revascularisation if indicated, and wound bed preparation prior to application of cryopreserved, glycerol-preserved, or lyophilized cadaveric grafts. Outcomes were assessed at predefined intervals up to 10.5 months.ResultsA total of 48 patients were enrolled. Arterial etiology was the most prevalent (33 patients, 68.7%). Complete wound healing was achieved in 47.9% of patients, with a mean time to re-epithelialization of 106.6 days. Limb salvage was attained in 97.9% of cases. Significant pain reduction was observed, with VAS scores dropping from 6.8 ± 1.9 at baseline to 1.5 ± 2.7 at six months (p < 0.0001). The Falanga A wound bed category increased from 42.5% at baseline to 84% at 6 months, and infection rates declined from 42.5% to <12% during follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed superior healing outcomes among arterial HHWs compared to non-arterial HHWs (p < 0.05).ConclusionCadaveric skin bank bioproducts offer an effective and safe option for the treatment of hard-to-heal wounds, particularly in patients with vascular disease. In this cohort, the approach led to a high rate of complete healing and limb salvage with significant pain reduction and enhanced wound bed quality. These results highlight the therapeutic value of allografts when used as part of an integrated protocol that includes revascularisation and meticulous wound bed preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251356857"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144593250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
ObjectivePressure ulcers seriously affect patient quality of life. The present study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of 25% zinc oxide topical cream on treating stage I and II pressure ulcers.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind clinical trial involved 60 patients, divided into the control group (n = 30) receiving a silver-containing dressing and the intervention group (n = 30) treated with 25% zinc oxide cream. Wound assessments were conducted on days 0, 7, and 14, alongside standard care.ResultsIn the end, the intervention group showed significantly higher rates of "partial healing" and "peri-wound erythema reduction" than the control group (pvalue < .05). The intervention group's partial healing increased from 3.33% (day 7) to 83.34% (day 14) (pvalue < .05), whereas the control group reached from 26.67% to 60%. On day 14, the intervention group experienced a 50% decrease in peri-wound erythema, while the control group only experienced a 9.5% reduction (pvalue < .05). Also, 3.33% of the intervention group achieved complete healing, while none in the control group did.ConclusionThe findings suggest that 25% zinc oxide cream may function as an effective and cost-efficient alternative to conventional dressings in managing stage I and II pressure ulcers.Graphical abstract[Formula: see text].
{"title":"High-dose Topical Zinc Oxide Promotes Healing Indices of Pressure Ulcers: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Rayehe Fadaei, Amir Larki-Harchegani, Firozeh Sajedi, Shabnam Pourmoslemi, Salman Khazaei, Somayeh Shabib","doi":"10.1177/15347346251351296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251351296","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivePressure ulcers seriously affect patient quality of life. The present study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of 25% zinc oxide topical cream on treating stage I and II pressure ulcers.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind clinical trial involved 60 patients, divided into the control group (n = 30) receiving a silver-containing dressing and the intervention group (n = 30) treated with 25% zinc oxide cream. Wound assessments were conducted on days 0, 7, and 14, alongside standard care.ResultsIn the end, the intervention group showed significantly higher rates of \"partial healing\" and \"peri-wound erythema reduction\" than the control group (<i>p<sub>value</sub></i> < .05). The intervention group's partial healing increased from 3.33% (day 7) to 83.34% (day 14) (<i>p<sub>value</sub></i> < .05), whereas the control group reached from 26.67% to 60%. On day 14, the intervention group experienced a 50% decrease in peri-wound erythema, while the control group only experienced a 9.5% reduction (<i>p<sub>value</sub></i> < .05). Also, 3.33% of the intervention group achieved complete healing, while none in the control group did.ConclusionThe findings suggest that 25% zinc oxide cream may function as an effective and cost-efficient alternative to conventional dressings in managing stage I and II pressure ulcers.Graphical abstract[Formula: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251351296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144593251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common and serious complication of diabetes mellitus, with high rates of disability and mortality. Early diagnosis and prevention can effectively reduce its incidence. The relationship between hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte count, and platelet (HALP) score, which are biomarkers reflecting the inflammatory and nutritional status of the body, and DFU has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the association between HALP score and DFU.MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2004. Logistic regression models assessed the relationship between HALP scores (as both continuous and categorical variables) and DFU, adjusting for confounders. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was employed to evaluate potential non-linear relationships. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings.ResultsA total of 1604 participants (mean age: 61.67 ± 11.88 years; 52.9% male) were included. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for multiple confounders, revealed a negative correlation between the HALP score and DFU (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, P = 0.041). This association remained significant when the HALP was categorized into quartiles. RCS analysis identified a non-linear relationship, with an inflection point at 44.98 (non-linear P = 0.017). Subgroup analyses confirmed the consistency of these findings across different demographic and clinical groups. Sensitivity analysis excluding extreme outliers confirmed the stability and reliability of the results.ConclusionLower HALP scores are significantly associated with an increased risk of DFU. This study underscores the potential utility of the HALP score as a tool for identifying individuals at higher risk, supporting its use in the prevention and management of DFU.
{"title":"Association Between Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte, and Platelet Score and Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Zunwang Li, Hui Guo, Zhihong Fu, Dongxiao Li, Yunhui Zhang, Ruizheng Zhu, Junde Wu, Zhaojun Chen","doi":"10.1177/15347346251355578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251355578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a common and serious complication of diabetes mellitus, with high rates of disability and mortality. Early diagnosis and prevention can effectively reduce its incidence. The relationship between hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte count, and platelet (HALP) score, which are biomarkers reflecting the inflammatory and nutritional status of the body, and DFU has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the association between HALP score and DFU.MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2004. Logistic regression models assessed the relationship between HALP scores (as both continuous and categorical variables) and DFU, adjusting for confounders. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was employed to evaluate potential non-linear relationships. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings.ResultsA total of 1604 participants (mean age: 61.67 ± 11.88 years; 52.9% male) were included. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for multiple confounders, revealed a negative correlation between the HALP score and DFU (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, P = 0.041). This association remained significant when the HALP was categorized into quartiles. RCS analysis identified a non-linear relationship, with an inflection point at 44.98 (non-linear P = 0.017). Subgroup analyses confirmed the consistency of these findings across different demographic and clinical groups. Sensitivity analysis excluding extreme outliers confirmed the stability and reliability of the results.ConclusionLower HALP scores are significantly associated with an increased risk of DFU. This study underscores the potential utility of the HALP score as a tool for identifying individuals at higher risk, supporting its use in the prevention and management of DFU.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251355578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144556302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundAdvanced wound care dressings are vital in managing the complexities of chronic wound treatment. For instance, Theruptor 3-D composite microbicidal dressing is designed with antimicrobial properties to promote wound healing. Despite the availability of several antimicrobial products in the market such as Bactigras, Allevyn, and Aquacel, their comparative efficacy remains unexplored. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of Theruptor versus Bactigras and Allevyn dressings for chronic wound healing.MethodsA randomized, parallel-group study was conducted from May 2022 to July 2024 across five centres in India. Patients with chronic wounds were randomized to allocate Theruptor, Bactigras, and Allevyn dressings (diabetic and non-diabetic etiology; n = 35 each). Wound area, bacterial load, clinical signs and symptoms, exudate management, and product performance were assessed.ResultsA total of 210 patients with chronic wound in the age range of 19-87 years, were recruited and followed up for 8 weeks. The mean wound area was significantly reduced from Day 0 to Day 56 in in diabetic Theruptor (17.35 ± 15.08 cm2 vs 4.13 ± 10.56 cm2), Bactigras (12.93 ± 12.02 cm2 vs 3.6 ± 7.75 cm2), and Allevyn (14.36 ± 9.97 cm2 vs 0.74 ± 1.65 cm2) and non-diabetic Theruptor (20.45 ± 16.8 vs 3.01 ± 7.52 cm2), Bactigras (18.16 ± 14.81 vs 2.52 ± 5.48 cm2), and Allevyn (28.41 ± 19.97 vs 5.31 ± 9.94 cm2) groups (p < .0001). Further, bacterial load, exudate scores, and clinical signs and symptoms non-significantly improved with time in all three groups (p > .05). In product performance analysis, Theruptor dressing (n = 33/33) was rated more comfortable to wear than Bactigras (n = 24/28, p = .004) and Allevyn (n = 25/30, p = .02) in diabetic patients. Among non-diabetics, more patients reported "no pain" during application and removal of dressing in Theruptor group (n = 26/29 and 28/29) than in Bactigras (n = 18/31; p = .04 and n = 20/31; p = .02) and Allevyn groups (n = 12/29; p = .001 and n = 16/29; p = .003).ConclusionTheruptor provides a safe and effective alternative for chronic wound management with comparable healing outcomes to Bactigras and Allevyn dressings.
先进的伤口护理敷料在处理慢性伤口治疗的复杂性方面是至关重要的。例如,Theruptor 3-D复合杀微生物敷料具有抗菌特性,可促进伤口愈合。尽管市场上有几种抗菌产品,如Bactigras、Allevyn和Aquacel,但它们的相对功效仍未得到探索。本研究评估了Theruptor与Bactigras和Allevyn敷料在慢性伤口愈合中的临床疗效和安全性。方法于2022年5月至2024年7月在印度五个中心进行随机平行组研究。慢性伤口患者随机分配Theruptor、Bactigras和Allevyn敷料(糖尿病和非糖尿病病因;N = 35)。评估伤口面积、细菌负荷、临床体征和症状、渗出液处理和产品性能。结果共收集慢性创面患者210例,年龄19 ~ 87岁,随访8周。从第0天到第56天,糖尿病Theruptor组(17.35±15.08 cm2 vs 4.13±10.56 cm2)、Bactigras组(12.93±12.02 cm2 vs 3.6±7.75 cm2)、Allevyn组(14.36±9.97 cm2 vs 0.74±1.65 cm2)和非糖尿病Theruptor组(20.45±16.8 vs 3.01±7.52 cm2)、Bactigras组(18.16±14.81 vs 2.52±5.48 cm2)、Allevyn组(28.41±19.97 vs 5.31±9.94 cm2)的平均伤口面积显著减少(p)。此外,三组的细菌载量、渗出液评分、临床体征和症状均随时间无显著改善(p < 0.05)。在产品性能分析中,Theruptor敷料(n = 33/33)在糖尿病患者中的穿着舒适度优于Bactigras (n = 24/28, p = 0.004)和Allevyn (n = 25/30, p = 0.02)。在非糖尿病患者中,Theruptor组(n = 26/29和28/29)比Bactigras组(n = 18/31;p =。04, n = 20/31;p = .02)和Allevyn组(n = 12/29;p =。001, n = 16/29;p = .003)。结论theruptor为慢性创面治疗提供了安全有效的选择,其愈合效果与Bactigras和Allevyn敷料相当。
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Theruptor 3-D Composite Microbicidal Dressing in Comparison with Bactigras and Allevyn Dressings on Wound Healing in Participants with Chronic Infected Wounds: A Randomized, Multi-Centric, Comparative, Parallel-Group, Prospective Study.","authors":"Mayank Badkur, Vinoth Sundaresan, Tharun Ganapathy, Tushar Mishra, Keshavamurthy Vinay, Michael Rodrigues, Ashok Kumar Moharana, Deepak Ts, Sakthibalan Murugesan, Mahalakshmi Durai, Shoban Babu Varthya","doi":"10.1177/15347346251351460","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15347346251351460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAdvanced wound care dressings are vital in managing the complexities of chronic wound treatment. For instance, Theruptor 3-D composite microbicidal dressing is designed with antimicrobial properties to promote wound healing. Despite the availability of several antimicrobial products in the market such as Bactigras, Allevyn, and Aquacel, their comparative efficacy remains unexplored. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of Theruptor versus Bactigras and Allevyn dressings for chronic wound healing.MethodsA randomized, parallel-group study was conducted from May 2022 to July 2024 across five centres in India. Patients with chronic wounds were randomized to allocate Theruptor, Bactigras, and Allevyn dressings (diabetic and non-diabetic etiology; n = 35 each). Wound area, bacterial load, clinical signs and symptoms, exudate management, and product performance were assessed.ResultsA total of 210 patients with chronic wound in the age range of 19-87 years, were recruited and followed up for 8 weeks. The mean wound area was significantly reduced from Day 0 to Day 56 in in diabetic Theruptor (17.35 ± 15.08 cm<sup>2</sup> vs 4.13 ± 10.56 cm<sup>2</sup>), Bactigras (12.93 ± 12.02 cm<sup>2</sup> vs 3.6 ± 7.75 cm<sup>2</sup>), and Allevyn (14.36 ± 9.97 cm<sup>2</sup> vs 0.74 ± 1.65 cm<sup>2</sup>) and non-diabetic Theruptor (20.45 ± 16.8 vs 3.01 ± 7.52 cm<sup>2</sup>), Bactigras (18.16 ± 14.81 vs 2.52 ± 5.48 cm<sup>2</sup>), and Allevyn (28.41 ± 19.97 vs 5.31 ± 9.94 cm<sup>2</sup>) groups (<i>p < .0001</i>). Further, bacterial load, exudate scores, and clinical signs and symptoms non-significantly improved with time in all three groups (<i>p</i> > .05). In product performance analysis, Theruptor dressing (n = 33/33) was rated more comfortable to wear than Bactigras (n = 24/28, <i>p = .004</i>) and Allevyn (n = 25/30, <i>p = .02</i>) in diabetic patients. Among non-diabetics, more patients reported \"no pain\" during application and removal of dressing in Theruptor group (n = 26/29 and 28/29) than in Bactigras (n = 18/31; <i>p = .04</i> and n = 20/31; <i>p = .02</i>) and Allevyn groups (n = 12/29; <i>p = .001</i> and n = 16/29; <i>p = .003</i>).ConclusionTheruptor provides a safe and effective alternative for chronic wound management with comparable healing outcomes to Bactigras and Allevyn dressings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251351460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144512988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}