The Journal of hand surgery, European volume最新文献

The objective of this study was to assess the downsides of surgical treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion in patients with minor preoperative symptoms. Patients were classified with minor symptoms based on the Patient-Rated Hand/Wrist Evaluation questionnaire. Of the 35 included patients, most patients encountered problems with patient-specific activities; 9% reported worse postoperative functional outcomes, 34% were not satisfied with the treatment and 9% were reoperated. The risk of a worse functional outcome after surgery with the need for further operations and the chance of developing wrist osteoarthritis, along with the possibility of poor patient satisfaction and ongoing daily functional impairment, should be considered during preoperative counselling.Level of evidence: III.

The aim of this Delphi study was to provide a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms after trapeziometacarpal joint resection arthroplasty. Three Delphi rounds were conducted in which surveys were sent to 182 experienced hand surgeons worldwide. Responses were received from 140 participants. A consensus threshold was set at 67% agreement. Diagnostic tools and treatment approaches for six common revision scenarios achieved consensus. Radiographs are appropriate as primary (97%) and CT scans as secondary (76%) diagnostic tools. For scaphometacarpal impingement, 67% of respondents agreed that revision interposition is appropriate, with 93% recommending autologous tendon for the interposition. Additional suspension was considered appropriate by 68% of the participants. The diagnostic and treatment algorithm can help the surgeon to identify the reason for persistent symptoms after trapeziometacarpal joint resection arthroplasty and to choose an appropriate treatment strategy.Level of evidence: V.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials compared the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections with placebo injections and wrist splints for carpal tunnel syndrome, focusing on symptom relief and median nerve conduction velocity. Within 3 months of the corticosteroid injection, there was a modest statistically significant difference in symptom relief compared to placebo injections and wrist splints, as measured by the Symptom Severity Subscore of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; however, this did not meet the minimum clinically important difference. Pain reduction with corticosteroids was slightly better than with wrist splints, but it also failed to reach clinical significance. Electrodiagnostic assessments showed transient changes in distal motor and sensory latencies in favour of corticosteroids at 3 months, but these changes were not evident at 6 months. The best current evidence suggests that corticosteroid injections provide minimal transient improvement in nerve conduction and symptomatology compared with placebo or wrist splints.

This paper is intended to support hand surgeons who, at the beginning of their research career, are planning a clinical study. Besides establishing the research methodology of the study, the organizational planning of the work itself is essential. A feasibility analysis carried out before or during the writing of the study protocol helps to estimate the required resources and duration of a project. We highlight some tips and tricks as well as provide checklists that outline the important points to consider before starting a study.

The development of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) guideline was undertaken in accordance with the British Society for Surgery of the Hand Evidence for Surgical Treatment (BEST) Process Manual, which has been accredited by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK. This review article serves as a summary of the systematic reviews and the final guideline. The group included two patients, a radiologist, a commissioner, an emergency medicine doctor, hand therapists and hand surgeons. The group's recommendations are that patients with acute UCL injuries should be assessed with a history, clinical examination and radiographs. Patients without significant joint laxity can be treated non-surgically. Patients with significant joint laxity on clinical examination may be treated with non-surgical joint immobilization or surgical repair and should reach a shared decision with their clinician about the definitive treatment within 2 weeks of presentation.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate biomechanical properties of tendon turnover repair in comparison to direct repair and Pulvertaft weave. A total of 48 sheep flexor tendons were assigned to eight groups comprising single or double tendon turnover repair, tendon turnover segment (without tenorrhaphy), direct repair or Pulvertaft weave. Tensile strength, stiffness and failure mechanisms were evaluated with a 500 N load cell. Turnover repair showed no significant difference in tensile strength to direct repair. Failure in turnover repair occurred largely at the site of tenorrhaphy due to suture pull-through or suture rupture. the increase in cross-sectional area after turnover repair was similar to that after direct repair, but less than after Pulvertaft weave. Tendon turnover offers tensile strength similar to direct repair with no associated increase in bulk. It provides a biomechanically secure and quicker alternative to tendon grafting for reconstructing tendon defects, without secondary donor site morbidity.Level of evidence: V.

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 54 patients treated with occlusive dressings (OD) (27 patients) or local flap (LF) coverage (28 patients) for fingertip amputations with bone exposure. All patients healed completely within a mean of 5 weeks in the OD group and 3.5 weeks in the LF group. At a mean follow-up of 26 months (range 12-38), 2-point discrimination was significantly better in the OD group (4 mm) than the LF group (6 mm). Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) stiffness was more common in the LF group, affecting one-third of patients. A cost analysis showed that ODs were 6.5 times less expensive than LFs performed in the operating theatre. OD appears to be a reliable and more cost-effective alternative to LF for treating zone 2 and 3 fingertip amputations with exposed bone, with similar healing time, better tactile discrimination and a lower rate of PIP joint stiffness.Level of evidence: IV.

Although trigger thumb release is commonly performed, there is no consensus on the optimal skin incision. This study aimed to compare outcomes of four incision techniques, including V-shaped, oblique, transverse and longitudinal incisions. Outcomes included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, satisfaction with the treatment and postoperative complications. The results of 875 patients who underwent trigger thumb release were assessed. All groups demonstrated improvement in self-reported hand function (range of 10-14 points), pain (25-27 points) and aesthetics (4-7 points) from baseline to 3 months postoperatively with no differences between incision techniques. Of the patients, 76% reported good or excellent satisfaction with the outcome of treatment. Satisfaction and complication rates of the different incision techniques were similar. These findings imply that there is no clear benefit of one type of incision over another for trigger thumb release, suggesting that surgeons may use the technique of their preference.Level of evidence: III.

Vascularized periosteal grafts have been used to promote bone union in massive bone defects. We present a child with a failed distal humeral joint replacement for Ewing sarcoma reconstruction, successfully treated with a total elbow allograft augmented by vascularized periosteal grafts.Level of evidence: V.

This systematic review reports the clinical, patient-reported, radiographic outcomes, complications and survivorship of dual-mobility trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint arthroplasties including the MAÏA®, Moovis® and Touch® prostheses. Thirteen studies were included and outcomes reported for 1421 such arthroplasties. Overall, improvements in strength, range of motion, pain, function and satisfaction were demonstrated with a complication incidence of 13%. The risk of dislocation was 0.6%. The follow-up period was not long enough to draw conclusions about the long-term survival of the implants. Also, due to the low quality of the evidence, it was not possible to conclude that dual-mobility TMC arthroplasty was superior to trapeziectomy. This review highlights the need for Level I evidence with adequate long-term follow-up for TMC joint arthroplasty.