The Journal of nursing education最新文献

Background: Students who enter nursing programs without adequate study skills may be shocked when they fail their first nursing examination or assignment. If they continue to struggle, they may fail to progress to graduation or may perform poorly on their licensure examinations.

Method: Assignments based on self-regulated learning theory can help students develop control over their learning environment, establish effective study strategies, set goals, and prevent procrastination.

Results: Two assignments for students studying for a baccalaureate of science in nursing are presented as examples of activities that promote self-regulated behaviors: (1) Research Literature Search Assignment Strategies worksheet and (2) student-led examination reviews to prepare for an examination. Students' reactions to assignments are described.

Conclusions: Integration of the principles of self-regulated learning can add value to active learning. Faculty with an understanding of self-regulated learning theory are better able to recognize student deficiencies and design assignments to help students succeed. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

Background: Innovative models are required to maximize nursing student placements in environments of shrinking budgets, increasing hospital demands, and casualization and aging of the workforce. This article reports the success of a service-academic partnership in a dedicated education unit.

Method: This cross-sectional observational study in a regional hospital analyzed survey data using validated tools completed by buddy nurses (n = 80) and postplacement evaluation completed by students (n = 102) and the nurse leadership team (n = 17).

Results: Postimplementation, nursing student placement days increased, and participants were positive about the partnership. Although most of the nursing students (n = 96) reported they were very or extremely satisfied with their placement, they rated student facilitators higher than their buddy nurses.

Conclusion: Increasing enrollments will not solve the nursing workforce shortage unless student placements of quality and quantity are provided. Partnership in support of clinical staff remains critical to create time to provide quality supervision. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(9):619-625.].

Background: Quality clinical environments are crucial in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills. This study explored the mediating role of academic burnout in relation to workplace bullying experience, stress hardiness, and occupational identity among nursing students during clinical practice.

Method: In this cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire was administered to fourth-year nursing students from four universities. Data were collected in March 2023 and analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and PROCESS Macro Model 4.

Results: In the final sample (N = 202), the correlates of occupational identity were stress hardiness and academic burnout; workplace bullying was not statistically significant. Academic burnout completely and partially mediated the relationship between workplace bullying and occupational identity and between stress hardiness and occupational identity, respectively.

Conclusion: To strengthen nursing students' occupational identity, active attention and management are required to prevent academic burnout and improve stress hardiness. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(9):604-612.].

Background: Although evidence-based practice is a tenet of nursing education, students struggle to learn information literacy skills that transition to practice. This quality improvement project created an online learning experience for prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students to increase their ability to locate and critically appraise evidence.

Method: A framework based on nursing and information literacy standards was developed to establish baccalaureate-level information literacy knowledge and skills. This framework and cognitive constructivism were used to design a learning experience. The intervention was integrated into a research and theory course.

Results: Students demonstrated a higher level of competence in identifying types of sources and using information ethically but had a lower level of competence in defining their information needs and locating relevant resources.

Conclusion: Findings support the positive effects of an online learning experience to increase competence in the knowledge and skills expected of information-literate baccalaureate-prepared nurses. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(9):638-642.].

Background: Collaborative learning is an educational method widely used in nursing education that involves learners solving problems through teamwork. This study investigated the effects of using a metaverse virtual space for collaborative learning among nursing students.

Method: A nonequivalent control group posttest design was used, and focus group interviews were conducted. This mixed-methods study included second-year nursing students (n = 43) divided into two groups. The intervention group used metaverse methods for the group projects and the control group used traditional methods.

Results: Satisfaction with collaborative learning and peer evaluation of team projects were significantly higher in the intervention group compared with the control group. Participants' learning experiences were categorized into "unwelcome changes in the learning environment," "discovering the potential of a learning environment that encourages participation," and "tips for building a metaverse learning environment."

Conclusion: Metaverse collaborative learning is a student-centered educational approach that fosters active interaction and addresses the shortcomings of traditional approaches. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(9):585-593.].

Background: Integrating life-threatening clinical simulations improves learning outcomes. This study assessed nursing students' critical thinking factors before and after simulation, evaluated nursing clinical reasoning ability and learning satisfaction at two time points, and explored relationships and predictions among critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and satisfaction before and after simulation.

Method: Surveys and focus groups were used for this mixed-methods study.

Results: Quantitative findings revealed increased critical thinking scores for curiosity, skepticism, and systematicity; clinical reasoning; and satisfaction after simulation. Qualitative results supported these improvements and indicated enhanced curiosity for clinical knowledge and iterative phases of clinical reasoning. Students expressed satisfaction with the simulations. Objectivity significantly influenced clinical reasoning and satisfaction in nursing students following life-threatening simulations.

Conclusion: Fostering a culture of critical thinking in life-threatening simulations is crucial. Educators must teach the importance of objectivity in clinical practice, encourage critical evaluation, and foster self-reflection in simulations. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(9):595-603.].