Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-07-18DOI: 10.14740/cr1669
Miin-Yaw Shyu, Andrew Ying-Siu Lee
Background: Recently, it has been shown that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) can be used as a healthy regimen to reverse disease and aging. With this in mind, we are studying the consequences of RIC on cardiovascular function in heart failure patients.
Methods: Forty patients with stable heart failure were prospectively enlisted and randomly divided into RIC (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups. The RIC protocol consists of a 3-min inflation and then deflation of the blood pressure cuff attached to the upper arm to produce transient ischemia of the arm. RIC treatment was performed once daily for 1 year. NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial and ventricular dimensions were all assessed in two groups.
Results: RIC was well tolerated. After 1 year of treatment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved and LVEF showed a significant increase from 37.11% to 52.44% (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the dimensions of the left atrium (from 50.55 to 43.25 mm) and ventricle (from 53.04 to 50.15 mm) were significantly reduced in the RIC group.
Conclusion: This study suggests that 1 year of RIC treatment as a health strategy could improve cardiovascular function in heart failure patients, leading to its widespread use in these patients.
{"title":"Remote Ischemic Conditioning Improves Cardiovascular Function in Heart Failure Patients.","authors":"Miin-Yaw Shyu, Andrew Ying-Siu Lee","doi":"10.14740/cr1669","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, it has been shown that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) can be used as a healthy regimen to reverse disease and aging. With this in mind, we are studying the consequences of RIC on cardiovascular function in heart failure patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients with stable heart failure were prospectively enlisted and randomly divided into RIC (n = 20) and control (n = 20) groups. The RIC protocol consists of a 3-min inflation and then deflation of the blood pressure cuff attached to the upper arm to produce transient ischemia of the arm. RIC treatment was performed once daily for 1 year. NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial and ventricular dimensions were all assessed in two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RIC was well tolerated. After 1 year of treatment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved and LVEF showed a significant increase from 37.11% to 52.44% (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the dimensions of the left atrium (from 50.55 to 43.25 mm) and ventricle (from 53.04 to 50.15 mm) were significantly reduced in the RIC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that 1 year of RIC treatment as a health strategy could improve cardiovascular function in heart failure patients, leading to its widespread use in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":"309-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349135/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142104601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1655
Tetsuro Tachibana, Yuhei Shiga, Kohei Tashiro, Sara Higashi, Yuka Shibata, Yuto Kawahira, Yuta Kato, Takashi Kuwano, Makoto Sugihara, Shin-Ichiro Miura
Background: Left ventricular mass (LVM) is a predictor of future cardiovascular risk. We determined the association between LVM measured by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and the prognosis in patients who have undergone CCTA for screening of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study. Five hundred twenty consecutive patients who underwent CCTA at Fukuoka University Hospital (FU-CCTA registry) were enrolled. They were clinically suspected of having CAD or had at least one cardiovascular risk factor, and were a follow-up of up to 5 years. Equal to more than 50% of coronary stenosis as assessed by CCTA was diagnosed as CAD. Using CCTA, LVM index (LVMI), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV end-systolic volume were measured. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs: including all causes of death, ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization). The patients were divided into non-MACEs and MACEs groups.
Results: The non-MACEs and MACEs groups consisted of 478 and 42 patients, respectively. Percent of CAD in the MACEs group was significantly higher than that in the non-MACEs group. The MACEs group showed significantly higher LVMI and tended to have a lower LVEF and LVEDV than the non-MACEs group. Although LVMI was not associated with MACEs in all patients, LVMI was independently associated with MACEs in males (odd ratio: 1.018, 95% confidence interval: 1.002 - 1.035, P = 0.030), but not females.
Conclusions: Evaluation of LVMI by CCTA may be useful for predicting MACEs in males.
{"title":"Association Between Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Left Ventricular Mass Index in Patients Who Have Undergone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: From the FU-CCTA Registry.","authors":"Tetsuro Tachibana, Yuhei Shiga, Kohei Tashiro, Sara Higashi, Yuka Shibata, Yuto Kawahira, Yuta Kato, Takashi Kuwano, Makoto Sugihara, Shin-Ichiro Miura","doi":"10.14740/cr1655","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1655","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular mass (LVM) is a predictor of future cardiovascular risk. We determined the association between LVM measured by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and the prognosis in patients who have undergone CCTA for screening of coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cohort study. Five hundred twenty consecutive patients who underwent CCTA at Fukuoka University Hospital (FU-CCTA registry) were enrolled. They were clinically suspected of having CAD or had at least one cardiovascular risk factor, and were a follow-up of up to 5 years. Equal to more than 50% of coronary stenosis as assessed by CCTA was diagnosed as CAD. Using CCTA, LVM index (LVMI), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV end-systolic volume were measured. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs: including all causes of death, ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization). The patients were divided into non-MACEs and MACEs groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The non-MACEs and MACEs groups consisted of 478 and 42 patients, respectively. Percent of CAD in the MACEs group was significantly higher than that in the non-MACEs group. The MACEs group showed significantly higher LVMI and tended to have a lower LVEF and LVEDV than the non-MACEs group. Although LVMI was not associated with MACEs in all patients, LVMI was independently associated with MACEs in males (odd ratio: 1.018, 95% confidence interval: 1.002 - 1.035, P = 0.030), but not females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of LVMI by CCTA may be useful for predicting MACEs in males.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"134-143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236349/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1645
Poornima Vinod, Vinod Krishnappa, William Rathell, Saira Amir, Subrina Sundil, Godwin Dogbey, Hiten Patel, William Herzog
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers multiple components of the immune system and causes inflammation of endothelial walls across vascular beds, resulting in respiratory failure, arterial and venous thrombosis, myocardial injury, and multi-organ failure leading to death. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, aspirin was suggested for the treatment of symptomatic individuals, given its analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and antiviral effects. This study aimed to evaluate the association of aspirin use with various clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
Methods: This was a retrospective study involving patients aged ≥ 18 years and hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 2020 to October 2020. Primary outcomes were acute cardiovascular events (ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), type 1 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute congestive heart failure (CHF), and acute stroke) and death. Secondary outcomes were respiratory failure, need for mechanical ventilation, and acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE).
Results: Of 376 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 128 were taking aspirin. Significant proportions of native Americans were hospitalized for COVID-19 in both aspirin (22.7%) and non-aspirin (24.6%) groups. Between aspirin and non-aspirin groups, no significant differences were found with regard to mechanical ventilator support (21.1% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.16), acute cardiovascular events (7.8% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.32), acute DVT/PE (3.9% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.9), readmission rate (13.3% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.91) and mortality (23.4% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.5); however, the median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter (7 vs. 9 days, P = 0.04) and median length of hospitalization was significantly longer (5.5 vs. 4 days, P = 0.01) in aspirin group compared to non-aspirin group.
Conclusion: No significant differences were found in acute cardiovascular events, acute DVT/PE, mechanical ventilator support, and mortality rate between hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were taking aspirin compared to those not taking aspirin. However, larger studies are required to confirm our findings.
背景:2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)会引发免疫系统的多种成分,并导致血管床内皮壁发炎,导致呼吸衰竭、动静脉血栓形成、心肌损伤和多器官衰竭,最终导致死亡。在 COVID-19 大流行的早期,由于阿司匹林具有镇痛、解热、消炎、抗血栓和抗病毒的作用,因此被建议用于治疗有症状的患者。本研究旨在评估因 COVID-19 而住院的患者使用阿司匹林与各种临床结果之间的关系:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 10 月期间因 COVID-19 住院且年龄≥ 18 岁的患者。主要结果为急性心血管事件(ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、1型非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)、急性充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和急性卒中)和死亡。次要结果为呼吸衰竭、机械通气需求和急性深静脉血栓(DVT)/肺栓塞(PE):在376名因COVID-19住院的患者中,有128人服用阿司匹林。在阿司匹林组(22.7%)和非阿司匹林组(24.6%)中,因 COVID-19 住院的美国本地人比例都很高。阿司匹林组和非阿司匹林组在机械呼吸机支持(21.1% vs. 15.3%,P = 0.16)、急性心血管事件(7.8% vs. 5.2%,P = 0.32)、急性深静脉血栓/PE(3.9% vs. 5.2%,P = 0.9)、再入院率(13.3% vs. 12.9%,P = 0.91)和死亡率(23.4% vs. 20.2%,P = 0.5);然而,与非阿司匹林组相比,阿司匹林组机械通气的中位持续时间显著缩短(7 vs. 9天,P = 0.04),中位住院时间显著延长(5.5 vs. 4天,P = 0.01):结论:与未服用阿司匹林的患者相比,服用阿司匹林的 COVID-19 住院患者在急性心血管事件、急性深静脉血栓/动脉粥样硬化、机械呼吸机支持和死亡率方面无明显差异。不过,还需要更大规模的研究来证实我们的发现。
{"title":"Effect of Aspirin Use on the Adverse Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.","authors":"Poornima Vinod, Vinod Krishnappa, William Rathell, Saira Amir, Subrina Sundil, Godwin Dogbey, Hiten Patel, William Herzog","doi":"10.14740/cr1645","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers multiple components of the immune system and causes inflammation of endothelial walls across vascular beds, resulting in respiratory failure, arterial and venous thrombosis, myocardial injury, and multi-organ failure leading to death. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, aspirin was suggested for the treatment of symptomatic individuals, given its analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and antiviral effects. This study aimed to evaluate the association of aspirin use with various clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study involving patients aged ≥ 18 years and hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 2020 to October 2020. Primary outcomes were acute cardiovascular events (ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), type 1 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), acute congestive heart failure (CHF), and acute stroke) and death. Secondary outcomes were respiratory failure, need for mechanical ventilation, and acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism (PE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 376 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 128 were taking aspirin. Significant proportions of native Americans were hospitalized for COVID-19 in both aspirin (22.7%) and non-aspirin (24.6%) groups. Between aspirin and non-aspirin groups, no significant differences were found with regard to mechanical ventilator support (21.1% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.16), acute cardiovascular events (7.8% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.32), acute DVT/PE (3.9% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.9), readmission rate (13.3% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.91) and mortality (23.4% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.5); however, the median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter (7 vs. 9 days, P = 0.04) and median length of hospitalization was significantly longer (5.5 vs. 4 days, P = 0.01) in aspirin group compared to non-aspirin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were found in acute cardiovascular events, acute DVT/PE, mechanical ventilator support, and mortality rate between hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were taking aspirin compared to those not taking aspirin. However, larger studies are required to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"179-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236346/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1672
Poornima Vinod, Hiten Patel
The subclavian steal syndrome (SSS) is defined by the reversal of flow in the ipsilateral vertebral artery in the setting of subclavian artery stenosis proximal to its origin. Here, we describe a rare case of left SSS with significant left subclavian artery stenosis associated with anomalous origin of the left vertebral artery (LVA) directly from the aortic arch in a patient presenting with signs of vertebrobasilar insufficiency and resolution of symptoms following angioplasty. Through this case, the authors try to emphasize the importance and the correct technique of using Doppler ultrasonography, and the importance of invasive angiography in understanding the mechanism of subclavian steal in patients with anomalous LVA origin.
{"title":"A Novel Case of Anomalous Origin of Left Vertebral Artery Associated With Left Subclavian Steal Syndrome.","authors":"Poornima Vinod, Hiten Patel","doi":"10.14740/cr1672","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1672","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The subclavian steal syndrome (SSS) is defined by the reversal of flow in the ipsilateral vertebral artery in the setting of subclavian artery stenosis proximal to its origin. Here, we describe a rare case of left SSS with significant left subclavian artery stenosis associated with anomalous origin of the left vertebral artery (LVA) directly from the aortic arch in a patient presenting with signs of vertebrobasilar insufficiency and resolution of symptoms following angioplasty. Through this case, the authors try to emphasize the importance and the correct technique of using Doppler ultrasonography, and the importance of invasive angiography in understanding the mechanism of subclavian steal in patients with anomalous LVA origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"205-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1528
Chad Nicholson, Maxim Zlatopolsky, Jared Steinberger, Jacob Alex, Marcel Zughaib
Background: The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods: We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance.
Results: A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort.
Conclusions: In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.
{"title":"Disparity in the Under-Utilization of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Chad Nicholson, Maxim Zlatopolsky, Jared Steinberger, Jacob Alex, Marcel Zughaib","doi":"10.14740/cr1528","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"129-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236348/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1638
Jordan Llerena-Velastegui, Kristina Zumbana-Podaneva, Sebastian Velastegui-Zurita, Melany Mejia-Mora, Juan Perez-Tomassetti, Allison Cabrera-Cruz, Pablo Haro-Arteaga, Ana Clara Fonseca Souza de Jesus, Pedro Moraes Coelho, Cristian Sanahuja-Montiel
Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue and a leading cause of death. This study compares the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the management of IHD, focusing on their impact on revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and post-procedural stroke. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and CABG in treating IHD based on an exhaustive literature review of the past 5 years, emphasizing recent advancements and outcomes in IHD management.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review analyzed 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The study specifically assessed the incidences of revascularization, stroke, and MI in patients treated with either PCI or CABG. The comparison between CABG and PCI exclusively focused on lesions with a SYNTAX score exceeding 32.
Results: Our findings highlight CABG's significant efficacy over PCI in reducing revascularization and MI. The aggregated Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) value for revascularization was 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65 - 2.07), signifying CABG's advantage. Additionally, CABG demonstrated superior performance in diminishing MI occurrences (M-H = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.13 - 6.53). In contrast, PCI was more effective in reducing stroke (M-H = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.10).
Conclusion: The study confirms CABG's superiority in reducing revascularization and MI in IHD patients, highlighting PCI's effectiveness in reducing stroke risk. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in IHD management and emphasize the need for ongoing research and evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment selection for IHD patients.
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Jordan Llerena-Velastegui, Kristina Zumbana-Podaneva, Sebastian Velastegui-Zurita, Melany Mejia-Mora, Juan Perez-Tomassetti, Allison Cabrera-Cruz, Pablo Haro-Arteaga, Ana Clara Fonseca Souza de Jesus, Pedro Moraes Coelho, Cristian Sanahuja-Montiel","doi":"10.14740/cr1638","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1638","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue and a leading cause of death. This study compares the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the management of IHD, focusing on their impact on revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and post-procedural stroke. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and CABG in treating IHD based on an exhaustive literature review of the past 5 years, emphasizing recent advancements and outcomes in IHD management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review analyzed 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The study specifically assessed the incidences of revascularization, stroke, and MI in patients treated with either PCI or CABG. The comparison between CABG and PCI exclusively focused on lesions with a SYNTAX score exceeding 32.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight CABG's significant efficacy over PCI in reducing revascularization and MI. The aggregated Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) value for revascularization was 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65 - 2.07), signifying CABG's advantage. Additionally, CABG demonstrated superior performance in diminishing MI occurrences (M-H = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.13 - 6.53). In contrast, PCI was more effective in reducing stroke (M-H = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirms CABG's superiority in reducing revascularization and MI in IHD patients, highlighting PCI's effectiveness in reducing stroke risk. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in IHD management and emphasize the need for ongoing research and evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment selection for IHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"153-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236347/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1626
Suresh V Patted
Background: The use of multiple overlapping stents for long lesions in tapered coronary arteries has been associated with poor outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the 3-year safety and performance of the BioMime™ Morph sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in very long (length 30 to ≤ 56 mm) coronary lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter of 2.25 to 3.50 mm.
Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, observational, real-world, post-marketing surveillance study. Eligible patients were implanted with BioMime™ Morph SES. Patients were followed up at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
Results: A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 58.72 ± 10.10 years and 82.95% were male. Most patients had angina (81.82%) and ischemic heart disease (78.41%), and there was a high prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes mellitus (59.09%), and hypertension (54.55%). A total of 92 long coronary de novo lesions were treated with BioMime™ Morph SES with an average stent length of 45.54 ± 10.20 mm. Device and procedural success rates were 100%. One patient died at 30 days and one case of myocardial infarction was recorded. The cumulative rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 3.41%, 6.82%, 7.95%, and 7.95%, respectively. There were no cases of stent thrombosis (ST), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization until 36 months of follow-up.
Conclusion: BioMime™ Morph SES showed favorable outcomes up to 3 years in treating very long coronary lesions in native coronary arteries, as demonstrated by an acceptable rate of MACEs and absence of ST, based on clinical outcomes up to 3 years.
{"title":"Long-Term Safety and Performance of BioMime™ Morph Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System for Very Long Coronary Lesions.","authors":"Suresh V Patted","doi":"10.14740/cr1626","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of multiple overlapping stents for long lesions in tapered coronary arteries has been associated with poor outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the 3-year safety and performance of the BioMime™ Morph sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in very long (length 30 to ≤ 56 mm) coronary lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter of 2.25 to 3.50 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center, observational, real-world, post-marketing surveillance study. Eligible patients were implanted with BioMime™ Morph SES. Patients were followed up at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 58.72 ± 10.10 years and 82.95% were male. Most patients had angina (81.82%) and ischemic heart disease (78.41%), and there was a high prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes mellitus (59.09%), and hypertension (54.55%). A total of 92 long coronary <i>de novo</i> lesions were treated with BioMime™ Morph SES with an average stent length of 45.54 ± 10.20 mm. Device and procedural success rates were 100%. One patient died at 30 days and one case of myocardial infarction was recorded. The cumulative rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 3.41%, 6.82%, 7.95%, and 7.95%, respectively. There were no cases of stent thrombosis (ST), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization until 36 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BioMime™ Morph SES showed favorable outcomes up to 3 years in treating very long coronary lesions in native coronary arteries, as demonstrated by an acceptable rate of MACEs and absence of ST, based on clinical outcomes up to 3 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1634
Yan Song, Ying Dang, Jun Feng, Li Tao Ruan
Background: We investigated the relationship between remnant cholesterol and carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with ischemic stroke.
Methods: This was a single-center study. Remnant cholesterol is calculated as total cholesterol minus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) minus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). All patients underwent CEUS. IPN is graded according to the presence and location of microbubbles within each plaque.
Results: The cohort included 110 patients with ischemic stroke. Patients with an IPN grading of 2 had higher triglyceride (TG), non-HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol concentrations than those with an IPN grading of < 2 (TG: 1.45 ± 0.69 vs. 0.96 ± 0.24 mmol/L, P < 0.001; non-HDL-C: 2.63 ± 0.85 vs. 2.31 ± 0.64 mmol/L, P = 0.037; remnant cholesterol: 0.57 ± 0.23 vs. 0.44 ± 0.07 mmol/L, P < 0.001). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for remnant cholesterol was 27.728 (2.714 - 283.253) for an IPN grading of 2 in the subset of patients with an optimal LDL-C concentration.
Conclusions: The remnant cholesterol concentration is significantly associated with carotid IPN on CEUS in patients with ischemic stroke with an optimal LDL-C concentration. Remnant cholesterol may be an important indicator of risk stratification in patients with ischemic stroke.
{"title":"Remnant Cholesterol and Carotid Intraplaque Neovascularization Assessed by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Yan Song, Ying Dang, Jun Feng, Li Tao Ruan","doi":"10.14740/cr1634","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1634","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the relationship between remnant cholesterol and carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center study. Remnant cholesterol is calculated as total cholesterol minus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) minus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). All patients underwent CEUS. IPN is graded according to the presence and location of microbubbles within each plaque.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 110 patients with ischemic stroke. Patients with an IPN grading of 2 had higher triglyceride (TG), non-HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol concentrations than those with an IPN grading of < 2 (TG: 1.45 ± 0.69 vs. 0.96 ± 0.24 mmol/L, P < 0.001; non-HDL-C: 2.63 ± 0.85 vs. 2.31 ± 0.64 mmol/L, P = 0.037; remnant cholesterol: 0.57 ± 0.23 vs. 0.44 ± 0.07 mmol/L, P < 0.001). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for remnant cholesterol was 27.728 (2.714 - 283.253) for an IPN grading of 2 in the subset of patients with an optimal LDL-C concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The remnant cholesterol concentration is significantly associated with carotid IPN on CEUS in patients with ischemic stroke with an optimal LDL-C concentration. Remnant cholesterol may be an important indicator of risk stratification in patients with ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"144-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236345/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1659
Said Hajouli, Adam Belcher, Frank Annie, Ahmad Elashery
Background: The mortality rate of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has decreased between 1999 and 2020. The risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in HCM were updated in the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) 2020 guidelines by adding new risk factors, like the late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for most cardiac diseases; however, it is not included in these guidelines due to a lack of strong evidence of a correlation between T2DM and mortality in HCM. Therefore, we sought to investigate if T2DM increases the 5-year risk rate for adverse outcomes, such as heart failure and all-cause mortality in patients with HCM.
Methods: We collected patient data from January 1, 2018, to March 1, 2023, using the TriNetX database. The sample included 80,502 individuals with HCM, then divided into two cohorts based on the absence (58,573; cohort 1) or presence (15,296; cohort 2) of T2DM. The two matched groups then underwent survival and risk analyses for all-cause mortality or the first incidence of heart failure diagnosis within 5 years from the point in time when the selection criteria were first met.
Results: We found a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality and new-onset heart failure in HCM patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes after adjusting for major risk factors.
Conclusions: This is one of the largest retrospective cohort studies that examined the correlation between T2DM and adverse outcomes in patients with HCM. This underlines the need for future prospective studies investigating the effects of T2DM on HCM outcomes.
{"title":"Is Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus an Independent Risk Factor for Mortality in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?","authors":"Said Hajouli, Adam Belcher, Frank Annie, Ahmad Elashery","doi":"10.14740/cr1659","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1659","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mortality rate of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has decreased between 1999 and 2020. The risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in HCM were updated in the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) 2020 guidelines by adding new risk factors, like the late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for most cardiac diseases; however, it is not included in these guidelines due to a lack of strong evidence of a correlation between T2DM and mortality in HCM. Therefore, we sought to investigate if T2DM increases the 5-year risk rate for adverse outcomes, such as heart failure and all-cause mortality in patients with HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected patient data from January 1, 2018, to March 1, 2023, using the TriNetX database. The sample included 80,502 individuals with HCM, then divided into two cohorts based on the absence (58,573; cohort 1) or presence (15,296; cohort 2) of T2DM. The two matched groups then underwent survival and risk analyses for all-cause mortality or the first incidence of heart failure diagnosis within 5 years from the point in time when the selection criteria were first met.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality and new-onset heart failure in HCM patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes after adjusting for major risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the largest retrospective cohort studies that examined the correlation between T2DM and adverse outcomes in patients with HCM. This underlines the need for future prospective studies investigating the effects of T2DM on HCM outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"198-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1651
Satoru Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Motozawa, Toshiki Mano
Background: This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the drug-eluting stent (DES) selection criteria of cardiologists in association with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and to determine whether they value further DES improvements and modifications.
Methods: The survey was conducted on a group of cardiologist operators from April 10 to 30, 2023.
Results: The analysis included 126 operators who answered the questions. Of these, low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators accounted for 49 (38.9%), 47 (37.3%), and 30 (23.8%), respectively. Overall, Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) was most frequently used, with > 70% of cardiologists using it in > 20% of their PCI practice. The percentage of selection by low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators among the DESs used demonstrated no difference, except for dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34+ antibody-coated Combo® stent (DTS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low-volume operators are less likely to be affected in terms of company/sales representative (odds ratio (OR): 0.402, P = 0.031) and bending lesions (OR: 0.339, P = 0.037) for selecting DES. Low-volume operators less frequently selected Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR: 0.689, P = 0.043) and DTS (Drug-Eluting Stents) (OR: 0.361, P = 0.006) for PCI.
Conclusions: The current study results indicate that patient background, DES performance, and product specifications were not criteria for DES selection in cardiologists with different PCI volumes in routine PCI.
{"title":"Selection Criteria in the Era of Perfect Competition for Drug-Eluting Stents in Association With Operator Volumes: An Operator-Volume Analysis of the Selection DES Study.","authors":"Satoru Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Motozawa, Toshiki Mano","doi":"10.14740/cr1651","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1651","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the drug-eluting stent (DES) selection criteria of cardiologists in association with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and to determine whether they value further DES improvements and modifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was conducted on a group of cardiologist operators from April 10 to 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 126 operators who answered the questions. Of these, low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators accounted for 49 (38.9%), 47 (37.3%), and 30 (23.8%), respectively. Overall, Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) was most frequently used, with > 70% of cardiologists using it in > 20% of their PCI practice. The percentage of selection by low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators among the DESs used demonstrated no difference, except for dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34<sup>+</sup> antibody-coated Combo<sup>®</sup> stent (DTS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low-volume operators are less likely to be affected in terms of company/sales representative (odds ratio (OR): 0.402, P = 0.031) and bending lesions (OR: 0.339, P = 0.037) for selecting DES. Low-volume operators less frequently selected Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR: 0.689, P = 0.043) and DTS (Drug-Eluting Stents) (OR: 0.361, P = 0.006) for PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study results indicate that patient background, DES performance, and product specifications were not criteria for DES selection in cardiologists with different PCI volumes in routine PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"189-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}