Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1672
Poornima Vinod, Hiten Patel
The subclavian steal syndrome (SSS) is defined by the reversal of flow in the ipsilateral vertebral artery in the setting of subclavian artery stenosis proximal to its origin. Here, we describe a rare case of left SSS with significant left subclavian artery stenosis associated with anomalous origin of the left vertebral artery (LVA) directly from the aortic arch in a patient presenting with signs of vertebrobasilar insufficiency and resolution of symptoms following angioplasty. Through this case, the authors try to emphasize the importance and the correct technique of using Doppler ultrasonography, and the importance of invasive angiography in understanding the mechanism of subclavian steal in patients with anomalous LVA origin.
{"title":"A Novel Case of Anomalous Origin of Left Vertebral Artery Associated With Left Subclavian Steal Syndrome.","authors":"Poornima Vinod, Hiten Patel","doi":"10.14740/cr1672","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1672","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The subclavian steal syndrome (SSS) is defined by the reversal of flow in the ipsilateral vertebral artery in the setting of subclavian artery stenosis proximal to its origin. Here, we describe a rare case of left SSS with significant left subclavian artery stenosis associated with anomalous origin of the left vertebral artery (LVA) directly from the aortic arch in a patient presenting with signs of vertebrobasilar insufficiency and resolution of symptoms following angioplasty. Through this case, the authors try to emphasize the importance and the correct technique of using Doppler ultrasonography, and the importance of invasive angiography in understanding the mechanism of subclavian steal in patients with anomalous LVA origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"205-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1528
Chad Nicholson, Maxim Zlatopolsky, Jared Steinberger, Jacob Alex, Marcel Zughaib
Background: The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Methods: We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance.
Results: A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort.
Conclusions: In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.
{"title":"Disparity in the Under-Utilization of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"Chad Nicholson, Maxim Zlatopolsky, Jared Steinberger, Jacob Alex, Marcel Zughaib","doi":"10.14740/cr1528","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"129-133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236348/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1638
Jordan Llerena-Velastegui, Kristina Zumbana-Podaneva, Sebastian Velastegui-Zurita, Melany Mejia-Mora, Juan Perez-Tomassetti, Allison Cabrera-Cruz, Pablo Haro-Arteaga, Ana Clara Fonseca Souza de Jesus, Pedro Moraes Coelho, Cristian Sanahuja-Montiel
Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue and a leading cause of death. This study compares the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the management of IHD, focusing on their impact on revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and post-procedural stroke. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and CABG in treating IHD based on an exhaustive literature review of the past 5 years, emphasizing recent advancements and outcomes in IHD management.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review analyzed 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The study specifically assessed the incidences of revascularization, stroke, and MI in patients treated with either PCI or CABG. The comparison between CABG and PCI exclusively focused on lesions with a SYNTAX score exceeding 32.
Results: Our findings highlight CABG's significant efficacy over PCI in reducing revascularization and MI. The aggregated Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) value for revascularization was 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65 - 2.07), signifying CABG's advantage. Additionally, CABG demonstrated superior performance in diminishing MI occurrences (M-H = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.13 - 6.53). In contrast, PCI was more effective in reducing stroke (M-H = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.10).
Conclusion: The study confirms CABG's superiority in reducing revascularization and MI in IHD patients, highlighting PCI's effectiveness in reducing stroke risk. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in IHD management and emphasize the need for ongoing research and evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment selection for IHD patients.
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Jordan Llerena-Velastegui, Kristina Zumbana-Podaneva, Sebastian Velastegui-Zurita, Melany Mejia-Mora, Juan Perez-Tomassetti, Allison Cabrera-Cruz, Pablo Haro-Arteaga, Ana Clara Fonseca Souza de Jesus, Pedro Moraes Coelho, Cristian Sanahuja-Montiel","doi":"10.14740/cr1638","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1638","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a major global health issue and a leading cause of death. This study compares the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the management of IHD, focusing on their impact on revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), and post-procedural stroke. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of PCI and CABG in treating IHD based on an exhaustive literature review of the past 5 years, emphasizing recent advancements and outcomes in IHD management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review analyzed 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The study specifically assessed the incidences of revascularization, stroke, and MI in patients treated with either PCI or CABG. The comparison between CABG and PCI exclusively focused on lesions with a SYNTAX score exceeding 32.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight CABG's significant efficacy over PCI in reducing revascularization and MI. The aggregated Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) value for revascularization was 1.85 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65 - 2.07), signifying CABG's advantage. Additionally, CABG demonstrated superior performance in diminishing MI occurrences (M-H = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.13 - 6.53). In contrast, PCI was more effective in reducing stroke (M-H = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study confirms CABG's superiority in reducing revascularization and MI in IHD patients, highlighting PCI's effectiveness in reducing stroke risk. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in IHD management and emphasize the need for ongoing research and evidence-based guidelines to aid in treatment selection for IHD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"153-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236347/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1626
Suresh V Patted
Background: The use of multiple overlapping stents for long lesions in tapered coronary arteries has been associated with poor outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the 3-year safety and performance of the BioMime™ Morph sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in very long (length 30 to ≤ 56 mm) coronary lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter of 2.25 to 3.50 mm.
Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, observational, real-world, post-marketing surveillance study. Eligible patients were implanted with BioMime™ Morph SES. Patients were followed up at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.
Results: A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 58.72 ± 10.10 years and 82.95% were male. Most patients had angina (81.82%) and ischemic heart disease (78.41%), and there was a high prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes mellitus (59.09%), and hypertension (54.55%). A total of 92 long coronary de novo lesions were treated with BioMime™ Morph SES with an average stent length of 45.54 ± 10.20 mm. Device and procedural success rates were 100%. One patient died at 30 days and one case of myocardial infarction was recorded. The cumulative rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 3.41%, 6.82%, 7.95%, and 7.95%, respectively. There were no cases of stent thrombosis (ST), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization until 36 months of follow-up.
Conclusion: BioMime™ Morph SES showed favorable outcomes up to 3 years in treating very long coronary lesions in native coronary arteries, as demonstrated by an acceptable rate of MACEs and absence of ST, based on clinical outcomes up to 3 years.
{"title":"Long-Term Safety and Performance of BioMime™ Morph Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System for Very Long Coronary Lesions.","authors":"Suresh V Patted","doi":"10.14740/cr1626","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of multiple overlapping stents for long lesions in tapered coronary arteries has been associated with poor outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the 3-year safety and performance of the BioMime™ Morph sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in very long (length 30 to ≤ 56 mm) coronary lesions in native coronary arteries with a reference vessel diameter of 2.25 to 3.50 mm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-center, observational, real-world, post-marketing surveillance study. Eligible patients were implanted with BioMime™ Morph SES. Patients were followed up at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 58.72 ± 10.10 years and 82.95% were male. Most patients had angina (81.82%) and ischemic heart disease (78.41%), and there was a high prevalence of comorbidities like diabetes mellitus (59.09%), and hypertension (54.55%). A total of 92 long coronary <i>de novo</i> lesions were treated with BioMime™ Morph SES with an average stent length of 45.54 ± 10.20 mm. Device and procedural success rates were 100%. One patient died at 30 days and one case of myocardial infarction was recorded. The cumulative rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 3.41%, 6.82%, 7.95%, and 7.95%, respectively. There were no cases of stent thrombosis (ST), ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization until 36 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BioMime™ Morph SES showed favorable outcomes up to 3 years in treating very long coronary lesions in native coronary arteries, as demonstrated by an acceptable rate of MACEs and absence of ST, based on clinical outcomes up to 3 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1634
Yan Song, Ying Dang, Jun Feng, Li Tao Ruan
Background: We investigated the relationship between remnant cholesterol and carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with ischemic stroke.
Methods: This was a single-center study. Remnant cholesterol is calculated as total cholesterol minus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) minus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). All patients underwent CEUS. IPN is graded according to the presence and location of microbubbles within each plaque.
Results: The cohort included 110 patients with ischemic stroke. Patients with an IPN grading of 2 had higher triglyceride (TG), non-HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol concentrations than those with an IPN grading of < 2 (TG: 1.45 ± 0.69 vs. 0.96 ± 0.24 mmol/L, P < 0.001; non-HDL-C: 2.63 ± 0.85 vs. 2.31 ± 0.64 mmol/L, P = 0.037; remnant cholesterol: 0.57 ± 0.23 vs. 0.44 ± 0.07 mmol/L, P < 0.001). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for remnant cholesterol was 27.728 (2.714 - 283.253) for an IPN grading of 2 in the subset of patients with an optimal LDL-C concentration.
Conclusions: The remnant cholesterol concentration is significantly associated with carotid IPN on CEUS in patients with ischemic stroke with an optimal LDL-C concentration. Remnant cholesterol may be an important indicator of risk stratification in patients with ischemic stroke.
{"title":"Remnant Cholesterol and Carotid Intraplaque Neovascularization Assessed by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Yan Song, Ying Dang, Jun Feng, Li Tao Ruan","doi":"10.14740/cr1634","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1634","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the relationship between remnant cholesterol and carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in patients with ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center study. Remnant cholesterol is calculated as total cholesterol minus low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) minus high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). All patients underwent CEUS. IPN is graded according to the presence and location of microbubbles within each plaque.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 110 patients with ischemic stroke. Patients with an IPN grading of 2 had higher triglyceride (TG), non-HDL-C, and remnant cholesterol concentrations than those with an IPN grading of < 2 (TG: 1.45 ± 0.69 vs. 0.96 ± 0.24 mmol/L, P < 0.001; non-HDL-C: 2.63 ± 0.85 vs. 2.31 ± 0.64 mmol/L, P = 0.037; remnant cholesterol: 0.57 ± 0.23 vs. 0.44 ± 0.07 mmol/L, P < 0.001). The multivariate-adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for remnant cholesterol was 27.728 (2.714 - 283.253) for an IPN grading of 2 in the subset of patients with an optimal LDL-C concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The remnant cholesterol concentration is significantly associated with carotid IPN on CEUS in patients with ischemic stroke with an optimal LDL-C concentration. Remnant cholesterol may be an important indicator of risk stratification in patients with ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"144-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236345/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1659
Said Hajouli, Adam Belcher, Frank Annie, Ahmad Elashery
Background: The mortality rate of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has decreased between 1999 and 2020. The risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in HCM were updated in the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) 2020 guidelines by adding new risk factors, like the late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for most cardiac diseases; however, it is not included in these guidelines due to a lack of strong evidence of a correlation between T2DM and mortality in HCM. Therefore, we sought to investigate if T2DM increases the 5-year risk rate for adverse outcomes, such as heart failure and all-cause mortality in patients with HCM.
Methods: We collected patient data from January 1, 2018, to March 1, 2023, using the TriNetX database. The sample included 80,502 individuals with HCM, then divided into two cohorts based on the absence (58,573; cohort 1) or presence (15,296; cohort 2) of T2DM. The two matched groups then underwent survival and risk analyses for all-cause mortality or the first incidence of heart failure diagnosis within 5 years from the point in time when the selection criteria were first met.
Results: We found a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality and new-onset heart failure in HCM patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes after adjusting for major risk factors.
Conclusions: This is one of the largest retrospective cohort studies that examined the correlation between T2DM and adverse outcomes in patients with HCM. This underlines the need for future prospective studies investigating the effects of T2DM on HCM outcomes.
{"title":"Is Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus an Independent Risk Factor for Mortality in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy?","authors":"Said Hajouli, Adam Belcher, Frank Annie, Ahmad Elashery","doi":"10.14740/cr1659","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1659","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mortality rate of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has decreased between 1999 and 2020. The risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in HCM were updated in the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) 2020 guidelines by adding new risk factors, like the late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for most cardiac diseases; however, it is not included in these guidelines due to a lack of strong evidence of a correlation between T2DM and mortality in HCM. Therefore, we sought to investigate if T2DM increases the 5-year risk rate for adverse outcomes, such as heart failure and all-cause mortality in patients with HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected patient data from January 1, 2018, to March 1, 2023, using the TriNetX database. The sample included 80,502 individuals with HCM, then divided into two cohorts based on the absence (58,573; cohort 1) or presence (15,296; cohort 2) of T2DM. The two matched groups then underwent survival and risk analyses for all-cause mortality or the first incidence of heart failure diagnosis within 5 years from the point in time when the selection criteria were first met.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality and new-onset heart failure in HCM patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes after adjusting for major risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the largest retrospective cohort studies that examined the correlation between T2DM and adverse outcomes in patients with HCM. This underlines the need for future prospective studies investigating the effects of T2DM on HCM outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"198-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.14740/cr1651
Satoru Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Motozawa, Toshiki Mano
Background: This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the drug-eluting stent (DES) selection criteria of cardiologists in association with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and to determine whether they value further DES improvements and modifications.
Methods: The survey was conducted on a group of cardiologist operators from April 10 to 30, 2023.
Results: The analysis included 126 operators who answered the questions. Of these, low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators accounted for 49 (38.9%), 47 (37.3%), and 30 (23.8%), respectively. Overall, Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) was most frequently used, with > 70% of cardiologists using it in > 20% of their PCI practice. The percentage of selection by low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators among the DESs used demonstrated no difference, except for dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34+ antibody-coated Combo® stent (DTS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low-volume operators are less likely to be affected in terms of company/sales representative (odds ratio (OR): 0.402, P = 0.031) and bending lesions (OR: 0.339, P = 0.037) for selecting DES. Low-volume operators less frequently selected Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR: 0.689, P = 0.043) and DTS (Drug-Eluting Stents) (OR: 0.361, P = 0.006) for PCI.
Conclusions: The current study results indicate that patient background, DES performance, and product specifications were not criteria for DES selection in cardiologists with different PCI volumes in routine PCI.
{"title":"Selection Criteria in the Era of Perfect Competition for Drug-Eluting Stents in Association With Operator Volumes: An Operator-Volume Analysis of the Selection DES Study.","authors":"Satoru Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Motozawa, Toshiki Mano","doi":"10.14740/cr1651","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1651","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the drug-eluting stent (DES) selection criteria of cardiologists in association with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and to determine whether they value further DES improvements and modifications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was conducted on a group of cardiologist operators from April 10 to 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 126 operators who answered the questions. Of these, low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators accounted for 49 (38.9%), 47 (37.3%), and 30 (23.8%), respectively. Overall, Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) was most frequently used, with > 70% of cardiologists using it in > 20% of their PCI practice. The percentage of selection by low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators among the DESs used demonstrated no difference, except for dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34<sup>+</sup> antibody-coated Combo<sup>®</sup> stent (DTS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low-volume operators are less likely to be affected in terms of company/sales representative (odds ratio (OR): 0.402, P = 0.031) and bending lesions (OR: 0.339, P = 0.037) for selecting DES. Low-volume operators less frequently selected Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR: 0.689, P = 0.043) and DTS (Drug-Eluting Stents) (OR: 0.361, P = 0.006) for PCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study results indicate that patient background, DES performance, and product specifications were not criteria for DES selection in cardiologists with different PCI volumes in routine PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 3","pages":"189-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236343/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141589718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome derives from lingering symptoms after an acute COVID-19 infection. Palpitation was one of the most common symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome that correlated with objective data such as persisting sinus tachycardia; but to our best knowledge, there is a scarcity of research regarding the association of COVID-19 and sinus tachycardia in the post-acute setting. Therefore, the purpose was to identify if there is an association between COVID-19 infection and sinus tachycardia in the post-acute phase, namely post-COVID-19 tachycardia (PCT) other than inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
Methods: This retrospective observational study entails 1,425 patients admitted for COVID-19 infection with the interest in finding an association with PCT. The prevalence of PCT was evaluated using descriptive statistics, predictions of patient characteristics and comorbidities were identified using multinomial logistic regression, and associations between patient comorbidities and characteristics were evaluated with corresponding Pearson Chi-square test and post hoc tests Phi and Cramer's V.
Results: The percentage of patients with PCT in our sample of interest was an average of 28.18%. There was a strong association of PCT with patients of age group less than 65 years. Other clinical characteristics, such as shorter length of stay, unknown smoking status, and patients with commercial type insurance, had significant association with PCT. COVID-19 severity categorized as "less severe", readmission rates within 30 days, and patients with less comorbidities were more likely to be associated with PCT.
Conclusions: PCT is likely a separate entity from IST and POTS, and an important entity under the umbrella of post-COVID-19 syndrome. It warrants further studies to elucidate the underlying pathophysiology and to confirm its presence as a distinct entity.
{"title":"Evaluation of the Existence of Post-COVID-19 Tachycardia in a Community Healthcare System.","authors":"Jifeng Wang, Dhaval Patel, Shane Robinson, Ania Rynarzewska, Oluseyi Abidoye","doi":"10.14740/cr1604","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1604","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome derives from lingering symptoms after an acute COVID-19 infection. Palpitation was one of the most common symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome that correlated with objective data such as persisting sinus tachycardia; but to our best knowledge, there is a scarcity of research regarding the association of COVID-19 and sinus tachycardia in the post-acute setting. Therefore, the purpose was to identify if there is an association between COVID-19 infection and sinus tachycardia in the post-acute phase, namely post-COVID-19 tachycardia (PCT) other than inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study entails 1,425 patients admitted for COVID-19 infection with the interest in finding an association with PCT. The prevalence of PCT was evaluated using descriptive statistics, predictions of patient characteristics and comorbidities were identified using multinomial logistic regression, and associations between patient comorbidities and characteristics were evaluated with corresponding Pearson Chi-square test and post hoc tests Phi and Cramer's V.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients with PCT in our sample of interest was an average of 28.18%. There was a strong association of PCT with patients of age group less than 65 years. Other clinical characteristics, such as shorter length of stay, unknown smoking status, and patients with commercial type insurance, had significant association with PCT. COVID-19 severity categorized as \"less severe\", readmission rates within 30 days, and patients with less comorbidities were more likely to be associated with PCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCT is likely a separate entity from IST and POTS, and an important entity under the umbrella of post-COVID-19 syndrome. It warrants further studies to elucidate the underlying pathophysiology and to confirm its presence as a distinct entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923255/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140093384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2024-01-10DOI: 10.14740/cr1600
Michael Sabina, M Mrhaf Alsamman
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity has increased globally over the past 50 years, affecting over 500 million adults worldwide in 2023. A novel class of drugs known as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have emerged as a beacon of hope in treating the pandemic of diabetes and obesity. This analysis' objective was to draw comparisons of how these medications reduce cardiovascular outcomes. The review revealed unique differences in GLP-1s, highlighting some of their strengths and weaknesses and which populations they can cater to preferentially. Even though all drugs in question of this review are proven to be efficacious for diabetes and obesity, differences in their cardiovascular safety profiles and efficacy were noted. The analysis recognized the potential of drugs like semaglutide and tirzepatide, as leaders in the space. Although this current assessment of where GLP-1 receptor agonists stand in regard to cardiovascular outcomes may still be premature, the space is extremely active, and there are trials that are highly anticipated to transform the landscape of diabetes and obesity management in patients with more established cardiovascular comorbidities in the near future.
{"title":"Pulse of Progress: A Systematic Review of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Cardiovascular Health.","authors":"Michael Sabina, M Mrhaf Alsamman","doi":"10.14740/cr1600","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1600","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity has increased globally over the past 50 years, affecting over 500 million adults worldwide in 2023. A novel class of drugs known as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have emerged as a beacon of hope in treating the pandemic of diabetes and obesity. This analysis' objective was to draw comparisons of how these medications reduce cardiovascular outcomes. The review revealed unique differences in GLP-1s, highlighting some of their strengths and weaknesses and which populations they can cater to preferentially. Even though all drugs in question of this review are proven to be efficacious for diabetes and obesity, differences in their cardiovascular safety profiles and efficacy were noted. The analysis recognized the potential of drugs like semaglutide and tirzepatide, as leaders in the space. Although this current assessment of where GLP-1 receptor agonists stand in regard to cardiovascular outcomes may still be premature, the space is extremely active, and there are trials that are highly anticipated to transform the landscape of diabetes and obesity management in patients with more established cardiovascular comorbidities in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923257/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140093389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01Epub Date: 2024-02-28DOI: 10.14740/cr1589
Alex Rivera-Toquica, Clara Saldarriaga, Jannes Buelvas-Herazo, Balkis Rolong, Fernando Manzur-Jatin, Jose Ignacio Mosquera-Jimenez, Oscar Alfredo Pacheco-Jimenez, Alvaro Hernan Rodriguez-Ceron, Patricia Rodriguez-Gomez, Fernando Rivera-Toquica, Guillermo Trout-Guardiola G, Marco Antonio De Leon-Espitia, Edgar Eduardo Castro-Osorio, Luis Eduardo Echeverria, Juan Esteban Gomez-Mesa
Background: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) represent conditions that commonly coexist. The impact of AF in HF has yet to be well studied in Latin America. This study aimed to characterize the sociodemographic and clinical features, along with patients' outcomes with AF and HF from the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).
Methods: Patients with ambulatory HF and AF were included in RECOLFACA, mainly with persistent or permanent AF. A 6-month follow-up was performed. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. To assess the impact of AF on mortality, we used a logistic regression model. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical tests were two-tailed.
Results: Of 2,528 patients with HF in the registry, 2,514 records included information regarding AF diagnosis. Five hundred sixty (22.3%) were in AF (mean age 73 ± 11, 56% men), while 1,954 had no AF (mean age 66 ± 14 years, 58% men). Patients with AF were significantly older and had a different profile of comorbidities and implanted devices compared to non-AF patients. Moreover, AF diagnosis was associated with lower quality of life score (EuroQol-5D), mainly in mobility, personal care, and daily activity. AF was prevalent in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF), while no significant differences in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were observed. Although higher mortality was observed in the AF group compared to individuals without AF (8.9% vs. 6.1%, respectively; P = 0.016), this association lost statistical significance after adjusting by age in a multivariate regression model (odds ratio (OR): 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95 - 1.92).
Conclusions: AF is more prevalent in HF patients with higher EF, lower quality of life and different clinical profiles. Similar HF severity and non-independent association with mortality were observed in our cohort. These results emphasize the need for an improved understanding of the AF and HF coexistence phenomenon.
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Colombian Heart Failure Registry.","authors":"Alex Rivera-Toquica, Clara Saldarriaga, Jannes Buelvas-Herazo, Balkis Rolong, Fernando Manzur-Jatin, Jose Ignacio Mosquera-Jimenez, Oscar Alfredo Pacheco-Jimenez, Alvaro Hernan Rodriguez-Ceron, Patricia Rodriguez-Gomez, Fernando Rivera-Toquica, Guillermo Trout-Guardiola G, Marco Antonio De Leon-Espitia, Edgar Eduardo Castro-Osorio, Luis Eduardo Echeverria, Juan Esteban Gomez-Mesa","doi":"10.14740/cr1589","DOIUrl":"10.14740/cr1589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) represent conditions that commonly coexist. The impact of AF in HF has yet to be well studied in Latin America. This study aimed to characterize the sociodemographic and clinical features, along with patients' outcomes with AF and HF from the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ambulatory HF and AF were included in RECOLFACA, mainly with persistent or permanent AF. A 6-month follow-up was performed. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. To assess the impact of AF on mortality, we used a logistic regression model. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical tests were two-tailed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,528 patients with HF in the registry, 2,514 records included information regarding AF diagnosis. Five hundred sixty (22.3%) were in AF (mean age 73 ± 11, 56% men), while 1,954 had no AF (mean age 66 ± 14 years, 58% men). Patients with AF were significantly older and had a different profile of comorbidities and implanted devices compared to non-AF patients. Moreover, AF diagnosis was associated with lower quality of life score (EuroQol-5D), mainly in mobility, personal care, and daily activity. AF was prevalent in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF), while no significant differences in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were observed. Although higher mortality was observed in the AF group compared to individuals without AF (8.9% vs. 6.1%, respectively; P = 0.016), this association lost statistical significance after adjusting by age in a multivariate regression model (odds ratio (OR): 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95 - 1.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF is more prevalent in HF patients with higher EF, lower quality of life and different clinical profiles. Similar HF severity and non-independent association with mortality were observed in our cohort. These results emphasize the need for an improved understanding of the AF and HF coexistence phenomenon.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10923258/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140093383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}