Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES最新文献

Background: Effective pain management is vital in critical care settings, particularly post-surgery. Clinicians should maintain objective and efficient standards to assess pain in a patient-centered manner, in order to effectively manage this complex issue. A newer technology, the nociception level (NOL) index, shows promise in achieving this task through its multi-parameter evaluation.

Methods: This study was a prospective, controlled, randomized trial involving two groups of patients (n=30 each) in a diverse intensive care unit. Participants were over 18 years old with American Society of Anesthesiology scores ranging from I to III and were scheduled for critical care follow-up after general anesthesia. All subjects followed a standard analgesia protocol that included rescue analgesia. Drug administration was guided by a numeric rating scale and the critical care pain observation tool in the Control Group, while it was guided by nociception level index monitoring in the NOL Group.

Results: Pain scores between the two groups did not significantly differ. However, within the NOL Group, pain scores and noci-ception values displayed a strong positive correlation. Notably, total analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the NOL Group (p=0.036).

Conclusion: Monitoring pain using the nociception level index is an effective method for detecting pain compared to standard pain scores utilized in critical care. Its guidance facilitates personalized analgesic titration. Additionally, the potential of nociception level index guidance to reduce the duration of intensive care and hospital stays may be linked to its effects on delirium, a connection that awaits further exploration in future studies.

Background: Numerous measurement techniques for intra-abdominal pressure have been explored, with the Kron Technique established as the gold standard. Despite its prominence, the search for alternative methods persists due to its lengthy application time, the requirement for additional equipment, and overall impracticality. This study investigated a quicker, more accessible method for effective intra-abdominal pressure measurement in the emergency department. It aimed to compare intra-abdominal pressure measurements in patients diagnosed with ileus using a digital manometer and the Kron Technique.

Methods: Conducted from October 2022 to February 2023, this single-center, prospective, single-blind method comparison study involved patients diagnosed with ileus at a tertiary emergency department. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured using both the Kron Technique and a digital manometer by separate practitioners blinded to the study results.

Results: The study included 30 patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in the intra-abdominal pressure measurements between the two methods (p<0.237). A very strong correlation existed between the two methods (Spearman's Rho = 0.998). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias value of 0.091 mmHg for the digital manometer, with upper and lower agreement limits of -0.825 and 1.007 mmHg, respectively. The measurement time was significantly shorter with the digital manometer than with the Kron Technique (15 vs. 390.5 seconds; p<0.001).

Conclusion: We believe that the intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique using a digital manometer is a method that can be effectively employed by healthcare professionals in emergency departments. This technique offers ease of use, requires minimal equipment, provides rapid results, and delivers reliable measurement values compared to the Kron Technique.

Background: Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a significant clinical condition that can arise during liver resections, trauma, and shock. Geraniol, an isoterpene molecule commonly found in nature, possesses antioxidant and hepatoprotective properties. This study investigates the impact of geraniol on hepatic damage by inducing experimental liver I/R injury in rats.

Methods: Twenty-eight male Wistar Albino rats weighing 350-400 g were utilized for this study. The rats were divided into four groups: control group, I/R group, 50 mg/kg geraniol+I/R group, and 100 mg/kg geraniol+I/R group. Ischemia times were set at 15 minutes with reperfusion times at 20 minutes. Ischemia commenced 15 minutes after geraniol administration. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and lactic acid were measured, along with superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity levels in liver tissues. Liver tissues were also examined histopathologically.

Results: It was observed that intraperitoneal administration of 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg geraniol significantly reduced AST, lactic acid, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels. The serum ALT level decreased significantly in the 50 mg/kg group, whereas no significant decrease was found in the 100 mg/kg group. SOD and GPx enzyme activities were shown to increase significantly in the 100 mg/kg group. Although there was an increase in these enzyme levels in the 50 mg/kg group, it was not statistically significant. Similarly, CAT enzyme activity increased in both the 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg groups, but the increase was not significant. The Suzuki score significantly decreased in both the 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg groups.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates that geraniol reduced hepatic damage both biochemically and histopathologically and increased antioxidant defense enzymes. These findings suggest that geraniol could be used to prevent hepatic I/R injury, provided it is corroborated by large-scale and comprehensive studies.

Background: This study evaluated the use of metformin or pioglitazone in preventing or reducing the development of post-operative intra-abdominal adhesion (PIAA) by employing histopathological, immunohistochemical, and biochemical analyses in an experimental adhesion model.

Methods: Fifty Wistar-Albino rats were divided into five groups: Group I (Control), Group II (Sham Treatment), Group III (Hy-aluronic Acid), Group IV (Metformin), and Group V (Pioglitazone). Adhesions were induced in the experimental groups, except for the sham group, using the scraping method. After 10 days, rats were euthanized for evaluation. Macroscopic adhesion degrees were assessed using Nair's scoring system. Immunohistochemical and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods were utilized to assess serum, peritoneal lavage, and intestinal tissue samples. Fructosamine, interleukin-6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), and fibronectin levels were measured in serum and peritoneal lavage samples.

Results: The groups exhibited similar Nair scores and Type I or Type III Collagen staining scores (all, p>0.05). Pioglitazone significantly reduced serum IL-6 and TGF-β levels compared to controls (p=0.002 and p=0.008, respectively). Both metformin and pioglitazone groups showed elevated IL-6 in peritoneal lavage relative to controls, while fibronectin levels in the lavage were lower in pioglitazone-treated rats compared to the sham group (all, p<0.005).

Conclusion: Pioglitazone, but not metformin, demonstrated a positive biochemical impact on preventing PIAA formation in an experimental rat model, although histological impacts were not observed. Further experimental studies employing different dose/duration regimens of pioglitazone are needed to enhance our understanding of its effect on PIAA formation.

Background: In school-age children, upper extremity fractures are associated with both parental and child-related factors and represent a multifactorial entity. This study aims to explore the psychological risk factors associated with upper extremity fractures in preschool children.

Methods: This single-center, hospital-based, age-matched case-control study involved 55 cases of upper extremity fractures and 55 controls experiencing growing pains. Parents of the children participated in face-to-face interviews. We examined the potential as-sociations between scores on the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS), Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Scale (ASRS), Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and the risk of upper extremity fractures.

Results: Advanced parental age and lower household income emerged as risk factors for upper extremity fractures, while longer maternal educational attainment was identified as a protective factor. In the univariate analyses, elevated scores on the Autism-Spec-trum Quotient Communication subscale (AQ-C), overall AQ score, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Hyperactivity subscale (SDQ-H), and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Emotional and Peer Problems subscale (SDQ-Int) were associated with an increased fracture risk (Odds Ratio [OR] (95% Confidence Interval [CI]): 1.15 (1.05-1.27), OR: 1.05 (1.01-1.09), OR: 1.25 (1.01-1.54), and OR: 1.19 (1.04-1.37), respectively). The AQ-C and SDQ-Int scales remained statistically significant as risk factors for upper ex-tremity fractures (OR: 1.15 (1.02-1.28) and OR: 1.21 (1.02-1.43), respectively) in the multivariate regression analyses.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that psychological factors affecting both parents and children could potentially increase the risk of upper extremity fractures in preschool children.

Background: We investigated the utility of specific biomarkers-namely, c-terminal telopeptide (CTX), n-telopeptide (NTX), deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-compared to conventional diagnostic methods. We hy-pothesized that these novel biomarkers could hold substantial value in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of osteoporosis.

Methods: The study was conducted over a three-year period, from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2023. We enrolled a total of 520 patients aged 50 years or older who had been diagnosed with osteoporosis. Patients undergoing steroid treatments, which are known to contribute to osteoporosis, were excluded from the study. Additionally, we carefully selected and matched a control group consisting of 500 patients based on demographic characteristics relevant to the diagnosis of osteoporosis. This meticulous selection process resulted in a comprehensive cohort comprising 1,020 patients. Throughout the study, patients were closely monitored for a duration of one year to track the occurrence of pathological fractures and assess their overall prognosis.

Results: As a result of our rigorous investigation, we identified CTX, NTX, DPD, and TRAP as pivotal biomarkers that play a crucial role in evaluating bone health, monitoring treatment effectiveness, and detecting pathological fractures in the context of osteoporosis.

Conclusion: Our study underscores the significance of these biomarkers in advancing the diagnosis and management of osteo-porosis, offering valuable insights into the disease's progression and treatment outcomes.

This case report explores the management of a traumatic hemipelvectomy-a rare and devastating injury characterized by a high mortality rate. The patient, a 12-year-old male, suffered right lower extremity amputation and right hemipelvectomy due to a deglov-ing injury from a non-vehicle-related accident at another institution. Initially, an urgent reconstruction of the right pelvic region and suprapubic tissue defects was performed using a posterior-based fasciocutaneous flap. Following this, the patient was transferred to the pediatric intensive care unit at our hospital with a suspected diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. Treatment included broad spectrum antibiotics and multiple debridements to avert the onset of sepsis. Eventually, reconstruction of a 60 x 25 cm defect covering the lower back, abdomen, gluteal, and pubic regions was achieved through serial split-thickness skin grafts and a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. The patient made a remarkable recovery, regained mobility with the aid of a walker, and was discharged in good health 22 weeks after the initial accident. This case report underscores the importance of serial debridements in preventing sepsis, the use of negative pres-sure vacuum dressing changes, the initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics based on culture results during debridements, and prompt closure of the defect to ensure survival after traumatic hemipelvectomy. Familiarization with the principles discussed here is crucial to minimizing mortality rates and optimizing outcomes for this rare injury.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the histopathological and biochemical effects of ketamine on penile tissues following ischemia-reperfusion injury induced by priapism.

Methods: Twenty-four male rats were randomized into three groups. Group 1 served as the control group. Group 2 underwent the priapism model to induce ischemia-reperfusion injury. Group 3, the treatment group, experienced a similar ischemia-reperfusion model as Group 2; additionally, 50 mg/kg of ketamine was administered intraperitoneally just before reperfusion. Blood biochemical analyses and penile histopathological evaluations were performed.

Results: In Group 3, significant improvements were observed in all histopathological scores, including desquamation, edema, inflammation, and vasocongestion compared to Group 2 (p<0.001). Blood biochemical analyses showed that the malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were recorded as 10 in Group 2, with a significant decrease in Group 3 (p=0.013). Similarly, proinflammatory cytokine levels, including interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), were found to be suppressed in Group 3 compared to Group 2 (p=0.003, p=0.022, and p=0.028, respectively). Antioxidant enzyme activities, such as glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), were higher in Group 3 compared to Group 2 (p=0.016 and p=0.024, respec-tively).

Conclusion: Ketamine is an effective anesthetic agent in alleviating the effects of penile ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Background: Previous research has shown that levobupivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine but carries a lower risk of cardiac and central nervous system toxicity. This study explores whether levobupivacaine and bupivacaine are preferable for all patients, includ-ing those with comorbidities, particularly focusing on their effects on colonic anastomosis. The primary objective is to examine the influence of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on colonic anastomosis. Additionally, the study will assess their impact on wound healing and their anti-adhesive properties.

Methods: Conducted between July 28, 2022, to August 4, 2022, at the Hamidiye Animal Experiments Laboratory, this study was approved by the University Science Health, Hamidiye Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee. This study was conducted using 21 male Sprague rats aged 16-20 weeks. The rats were allocated into three equal groups of seven each: Group C: pre-incisional isotonic; Group B: pre-incisional bupivacaine; and Group L: pre-incisional levobupivacaine. Macroscopic adhesion scores (MAS) were recorded during laparotomy and tissue samples were taken for histopathological examination and hydroxyproline levels measurement. Wound tensile strength along the middle incision line and anastomotic burst pressure were also assessed.

Results: MAS was statistically significantly lower in Groups B and L compared to Group C (p<0.001). The wound histopathology score (WHS) was significantly higher in Group L than in Group B (p=0.021). Colon histopathology scores (CHSs) were also signifi-cantly higher in Group L compared to Group C (p=0.011).

Conclusion: TThe study found that bupivacaine and levobupivacaine did not significantly enhance wound healing, although le-vobupivacaine significantly improved WHS relative to bupivacaine. According to the findings of this study, levobupivacaine can enhance clinical practice by being used in patients undergoing colon anastomosis. It contributes significantly to the durability of colon anasto-mosis, has a more positive effect on wound healing compared to bupivacaine, and exhibits anti-adhesive properties. Additional clinical trials are necessary to validate these results further.

Background: Transverse process fractures (TPFs) are commonly encountered in trauma patients and are often associated with polytrauma. While traditionally considered stable injuries, recent research suggests their significance in spinal trauma may be under-estimated. This study aims to provide insights into the management and outcomes of TPFs, evaluating their predictive potential for identifying clinically significant spinal fractures and associated injuries.

Methods: A retrospective review of trauma registry data from a Level I trauma center was conducted, encompassing patients with TPFs from September 2022 to September 2023. Inclusion criteria involved patients aged 18 or older with confirmed TPFs via com-puted tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), managed nonoperatively. Data on demographics, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, pain management, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Pain severity and functionality were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Results: A total of 190 patients, predominantly male (129 patients, 67.9%), with a mean age of 45.7 years, were included in the study. Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) were the leading cause of admission (44.7%). Thoracic injuries were the most common associ-ated pathology. Of the study cohort, 88 patients (46.3%) presented with single-level TPFs, while 102 patients (53.7%) had multilevel fractures. Analysis revealed distinct differences between these groups, with multilevel TPF patients exhibiting a higher frequency of associated injuries and a notable proportion requiring hospitalization or surgical intervention. Multilevel TPF patients exhibited higher initial pain and disability scores compared to single-level TPF patients. Both groups showed significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores at the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusion: TPFs, previously considered minor injuries, demonstrate significant pain and functional limitations. They often accompany systemic pathologies, particularly in multilevel fractures, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to management. The "Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation" (PRICE) approach, including Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants, along with collar or brace support when necessary, proves effective in pain management and functional improvement. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing TPFs as complex injuries requiring tailored management strategies. Further research and collaboration among healthcare providers are warranted to refine treatment approaches and optimize outcomes for patients with TPFs.