Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie最新文献

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of delayed reconstruction of the perforator pedicle propeller flap after the induced membrane technique in the treatment of Gustilo IIIB open distal tibial fracture, and to evaluate the clinical outcome and complications of two different perforator pedicle propeller flaps.Thirty-four patients with Gustilo IIIB open distal tibial fractures treated by the induced membrane technique and delayed reconstruction of two different perforator pedicle propeller flaps from May 2017 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the different kinds of perforator pedicle propeller flaps covered. The operation required two stages. The Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST) was used to evaluate the healing of the tibial bone defect. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was used to evaluate ankle function. The complications associated with the technique were recorded.The number of serial debridements, excluding those performed during emergency and final operations, was a mean of 2.28 ± 0.83 in the PAPF group. The PAPF group had a mean bone defect length of 6.76 ± 0.69 cm, the median healing time of 13.11 ± 0.96 months, RUST score 12.68 ± 1.63, and AOFAS score of 84.12 ± 6.38. On the other hand the PTAPF group's mean bone defect length was 6.73 ± 0.95 cm, the median healing time 12.63 ± 1.46 months, RUST score 13.73 ± 1.53 and AOFAS score 82.79 ± 5.49. There were no observed significant differences the two groups in the number of serial debridements, bone defect length, bone union time, RUST score, or AOFAS score (p > 0.05). Flap size ranged from 9 × 6 cm² to 14 × 7 cm² in the PAPF group and from 9 × 6 cm² to 13 × 7 cm² in the PTAPF group. There were no severe complications such as flap-related complications or amputation. The differences in complications in the two groups were not statistically significant.In cases of severe open tibial fracture, the reconstructive method is important. When delayed reconstruction is inevitable, surgeons should first perform radical debridement, followed by vacuum sealing drainage as a bridging therapy; both PAPF and PTAPF can be considered for definitive soft tissue coverage.

The implantation of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a proven method for pain relief and improvement in shoulder function. Results vary, depending on the patient's age, the severity of the disease, and the experience of the surgeon. Indications for RSA are diverse, ranging from rotator cuff arthropathy to fractures. Recent studies show improved survival rates and reduced complications after primary implantation. Preoperative planning using 3D-CT or MRI is considered to be the gold standard. Patient-specific instruments (PSI) have been introduced, but are associated with costs and waiting times. Navigation with augmented reality (AR) provides a more efficient alternative. The intraoperative transfer of the plan to the patient is carried out via AR glasses, allowing real-time information without having to divert the surgeon's attention from the surgical site. This optimises the workflow and potentially yields more precise implantation results. In summary, the combination of 3D planning, navigation, and AR offers a promising method for precise and efficient RSA-implantations. Nevertheless, long-term results and functional scores are not yet available.

Several studies have reported that low back pain has a high prevalence among the population, with up to 85%. Percutaneous radiofrequency facet denervation (PRFD) is the gold standard of today's rhizotomy for chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, previously published studies present controversial results for the efficacy of PRFD. Therefore, this study aimed to analyse the use of endoscopic facet joint denervation (EFJD) to treat chronic low back pain and to identify potential risk factors that could limit indications for surgery.We retrospectively included 31 eligible patients into the study with at least 24 months of CLBP. All patients underwent EFJD and had to complete ODI, COMI, EQ-5D and VRS scores postoperatively, with a minimum follow up of 12 months. Basic patient data was recorded to analyse correlations.We found a significant improvement in all clinical scores measured, such as ODI, COMI, EQ-5D and VRS scores. While the best result was found at the 3 months follow-up, a slight deterioration was found at 12 months follow-up. However, significant benefit was observed when compared to preoperative scores. 28/31 patients (93.3%) reported reduced pain at 12 months follow-up and were satisfied with the procedure. Older age and psychiatric precondition were identified as potential risk factors associated with poorer outcome. Postoperative complications such as haematoma, a sensibility disorder and temporary low extremity muscular weakness were rarely observed.EFJD showed significant improvement of the clinical outcome scores and VRS when compared to preoperative results of patients, with a minimum of 12 months of CLBP prior to surgery. Older patients and patients with a psychiatric precondition seem to benefit less from the procedure.

The concepts of both column fixation corridor (BCFC) and both column screws (BCS) along with the orthopedic total extraperitoneal approach (O-TEP) are highly innovative approaches in orthopedic surgery. However, the orthopedic literature lacks sufficient studies on these topics, indicating a significant gap. This case report aims to highlight how combining these innovative techniques can facilitate the use of BCFC and BCS in the treatment of acetabular fractures with O-TEP, thereby enhancing the feasibility of endoscopic techniques. Furthermore, we aim to discuss the potential advantages of BCFC and BCS concepts when used in O-TEP.For this purpose, we present a case of a 74-year-old geriatric patient with a transverse acetabular fracture involving the posterior column. The quadrilateral surface was exposed using the O-TEP approach, and the fracture was reduced using a fully endoscopic approach. The fixation was achieved using BCS and a Magic screw through percutaneous screw placement.The patient's clinical condition was followed for at least 13 months. The clinical outcomes demonstrated the effectiveness of combining these innovative techniques in the treatment of acetabular fractures, with satisfactory healing and functional recovery observed.This case report illustrates that combining BCFC and BCS with the O-TEP approach can facilitate the treatment of acetabular fractures with minimally invasive techniques and enhance the feasibility of endoscopic procedures. These findings suggest potential advantages of using BCFC and BCS concepts in O-TEP, warranting further investigation and study.

Cement leakage is the most common complication of vertebral cement augmentation. The present study investigated cement leakage rates in spinal cement augmentation procedures and identified potential risk factors for cement leakage.140 cases (258 vertebrae) in 131 consecutive patients and nine postmortem cases were evaluated. A total of 258 cement-augmented vertebrae were studied. The data for this were obtained from the hospital records of 131 patients who underwent such operations in 2 orthopaedic trauma surgery clinics in the FRG and from the examinations of 9 postmortem cases at the Institute of Forensic Medicine of the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf.Cement leaks were identified in 64 of the 140 cases (45.7%). Local cement leaks were the most common type of leak, accounting for 73.4% of leaks (n = 47). Venous leaks were evaluated in 15 cases (23.4%) and pulmonary embolisations in 2 cases (3.1%). Within the group of retrospectively studied cases (n = 131), only one patient (0.8%) suffered a symptomatic cement leak. Cement augmentation of fractures to lumbar vertebrae and application of large doses of cement were identified as risk factors for cement leakage.Both the data in the literature relevant to the topic and the results of this work demonstrate a high incidence of cement leakage after vertebral body augmentation procedures. Risk factors for cement leakage are described. Despite the low percentage of symptomatic cases, the possible factors influencing cement leakage should be considered and included in the surgical planning when planning and performing cement augmentations on vertebral bodies.