Translational gastroenterology and hepatology最新文献

Background: We assert that the ubiquitous environmental factor in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is our westernized diet. Therefore, all of our newly diagnosed patients were admitted to experience a plant-based diet (PBD). In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of a PBD in pregnant women with IBD.

Case description: Included in the study were women with IBD provided with a PBD (lacto-ovo-vegetarian diet) between 2004 and 2020 who were either pregnant or became pregnant. There were 10 pregnancies in eight cases: seven cases of ulcerative colitis (UC) and one case of Crohn's disease (CD). Five active cases during pregnancy were treated. The other five cases experienced the diet before pregnancy. Two cases developed UC either during pregnancy or in the postpartum period. The PBD without medication induced remission in two mild cases of UC. Infliximab and the PBD induced remission in a relapsed case of CD. There were six conceptions during remission without medication in four cases of UC. No case relapsed during pregnancy in these cases. Vaginal, cesarean, and vacuum extraction were undertaken in four, four, and two deliveries, respectively. Three in two cases were preterm deliveries. There were 10 live births in the eight cases. Two neonates from a mother had jaundice. In the median follow-up period of 71 months, all eight cases were in the quiescent phase. PBD scores in their follow-up period, which indicate adherence to the PBD, exceeded the baseline scores.

Conclusions: Our case series study indicated that a PBD was effective for pregnant women with IBD.

Background: Presarcopenia is a common complication of chronic liver disease. However, the relationship between serum zinc concentration and presarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease remains unclear. Herein, we examined whether serum zinc concentration could predict presarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease.

Methods: Between October 2015 and December 2019, 278 patients with chronic liver disease (median age, 68 years; women/men, 133/145; hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus/negative hepatitis B surface antigen and negative anti-hepatitis C virus antibody, 55/124/99) who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) and simultaneous measurement of serum zinc concentration were included. Zinc deficiency and subclinical zinc deficiency were classified using serum zinc concentration cutoff values of <60 and <80 μg/dL [based on the Japanese Society of Clinical Nutrition (JSCN) guidelines], respectively. Additionally, presarcopenia was evaluated based on the skeletal muscle mass as per the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH)'s sarcopenia criteria.

Results: Univariate analysis revealed that the following factors were significantly associated with the presence of presarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease: age (P<0.001), male sex (P<0.001), body mass index (BMI) (P<0.001), serum zinc concentration (P=0.005), fibrosis-4 index (P<0.001), and serum albumin concentration (P=0.03). Additionally, the median L3 skeletal muscle indices were as follows: men, non-presarcopenia group/presarcopenia group, 47.56/37.91 cm²/m² (P<0.001); women, non-presarcopenia group/presarcopenia group, 41.64/32.88 cm²/m² (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis revealed that male sex [odds ratio (OR), 0.194; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.089-0.419; P<0.001], BMI (OR, 0.666; 95% CI: 0.582-0.761; P<0.001), and serum zinc concentration <60 μg/dL (OR, 5.930; 95% CI: 1.480-23.80; P=0.01) were factors associated with presarcopenia. The OR for serum zinc concentration between 60 and 80 μg/dL was 1.910 (95% CI: 0.824-4.420; P=0.13).

Conclusions: Low serum zinc levels may be an independent predictor of presarcopenia in patients with chronic liver disease.

Background: Esophagitis, inflammation of the esophagus, can result from various causes, including reflux, infections, food allergies, medications, and trauma. Infectious esophagitis is the third most common cause after gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis worldwide. The primary causes of infectious esophagitis are candida esophagitis and viral esophagitis (VE) caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) or cytomegalovirus (CMV). VE is typically associated with immunosuppression, with risk factors such as malignancy, chemotherapy, organ transplant, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Infectious esophagitis is prevalent in about one-third of untreated acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients, but recent reports indicate an increase in VE cases among immunocompetent individuals. This study aims to explore risk factors and patient demographics in non-HIV individuals.

Methods: A case-control study that included patients 18 years and older diagnosed with HSV or CMV esophagitis who were identified through histopathologic examination or immunohistochemical staining. Cases were obtained by searching pathology reports between 2009-2022 from five MedStar Health Hospitals in the District of Columbia and Maryland. Controls were selected based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with negative VE results within the same period. Patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, endoscopic findings, and potential risk factors were collected through chart review.

Results: Out of 40,224 cases between 2009-2022, 50 cases of VE were identified, with 30 cases attributed to HSV, 19 cases to CMV, and one case of HSV/CMV coinfection. Hematemesis was the predominant symptom in patients with HSV (33%), while dysphagia was more prevalent in CMV patients (42%). The most common finding during EGD was ulceration in HSV patients (67%) and esophagitis in CMV patients (37%). Patients with VE had a higher likelihood of a history of immunosuppressive therapy, organ transplant, active malignancy, and systemic steroid use. However, a significant portion (34%) had no identifiable risk factors.

Conclusions: The study's findings contribute to a better understanding of the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with VE in non-HIV patients. The identification of immunosuppression and specific risk factors can aid in early detection, appropriate management, and targeted interventions for VE. Further research is warranted to explore the rising incidence of VE in immunocompetent individuals and to optimize preventive strategies and treatment approaches for this condition.

Background: Local ischemic preconditioning (LIPC) has been proven to be a protective strategy against hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI) during hepatectomy. Growing evidence suggests remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has the potential to reduce liver injury in hepatectomy. Few studies have directly compared the protective effects of these two mechanical preconditioning strategies. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of LIPC and RIPC for hepatic injury during liver resection.

Methods: We searched Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from the database inception to January 2023. We included studies directly comparing the effectiveness of LIPC and RIPC and those comparing LIPC or RIPC with no-preconditioning in liver resection. Postoperative liver function and surgical events were analyzed. Data were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or odds ratios (ORs) and analyzed using network meta-analysis with random effects model.

Results: Following the screening of 268 citations, we identified 26 eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 1,476 participants (LIPC arm: 789, RIPC arm: 859, no-preconditioning arm: 1,072). LIPC and RIPC were superior to no-preconditioning in reducing postoperative serum transaminase levels [aspartate aminotransferase (AST): SMD RIPC versus no-preconditioning: -2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.39, -0.71; SMD LIPC versus no-preconditioning: -1.10, 95% CI: -2.07, -0.12; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): SMD RIPC versus no-preconditioning: -2.24, 95% CI: -4.15, -0.32; SMD LIPC versus no-preconditioning: -1.32, 95% CI: -2.63, -0.01]. No significant difference was observed between RIPC and LIPC in postoperative liver function and surgical outcomes (AST: SMD RIPC versus LIPC: -0.95, 95% CI: -2.52, 0.62; ALT: SMD RIPC versus LIPC: -0.91, 95% CI: -3.11, 1.28). In addition, the subgroup analysis revealed the potential benefits of RIPC in improving liver function, especially in patients who diagnosed with cirrhosis or underwent major resection.

Conclusions: RIPC and LIPC could serve as effective strategies in relieving HIRI during hepatectomy. No significant differences were observed between LIPC and RIPC, however, RIPC may be an easily applicable strategy to relieve liver injury in hepatectomy.

Background: Deficient mismatch repair (MMR) leading to microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumors is thought to be present in over 15% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. Testing CRC for MSI has traditionally been recommended following the fulfillment of clinical criteria. However, the performance of clinical criteria, especially the family history, as a selection tool for MSI screening in CRC is questionable.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated the incidence of high degree MSI (MSI-H) tumors in an unselected population of CRC patients and compared its prevalence between individuals with and without family history of cancers within the spectrum of MSI-H tumors as defined in the revised Bethesda criteria.

Results: The study population included 274 patients, 70 with positive and 204 without family history of MSI-H tumors with complete data including findings from MSI analysis. The overall incidence of MSI-H CRC was 18.98%. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of MSI-H CRC amongst both groups. The sensitivity and specificity of family history with regard to the presence of an MSI-H tumor in this collective was 36.5% and 77.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: A relevant number of cases with high MSI-H CRC may be missed secondary to screening based on clinical criteria like family history alone. Thus, systematic screening independent of clinical characteristics, especially family history of cancer should be recommended in all cases with CRC.