Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01190-x
Ritsu Yoshida, Takayuki Ogawa, Yosuke Kayama
{"title":"Treatment of right coronary artery occlusion using the side-hole anchor balloon technique in antegrade approach.","authors":"Ritsu Yoshida, Takayuki Ogawa, Yosuke Kayama","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01190-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01190-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"177-178"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145184643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pragmatic implementation of intravascular lithotripsy in Japan based on the guidelines for proper use.","authors":"Takeshi Shiba, Masato Nakamura, Ken Kozuma, Teruyasu Sugano, Koichi Aizawa, Naoyuki Yabana, Kensuke Ishii","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01224-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01224-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Successful two-stage revascularization by securing a temporary distal outflow via an arteriovenous fistula for a long-segment infrainguinal arterial occlusion.","authors":"Tetsuya Nomura, Mai Imanaka, Shuhei Ogawa, Hiroshi Kubota, Yukinori Kato, Naotoshi Wada","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01189-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01189-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"181-182"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145022824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-26DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01194-7
Xiaoxue Zhang, Shiliang Li, Zijun Chen, Yi Feng, Xiang Wei, Cai Cheng
{"title":"Intraoperative imaging of a combined minimally invasive therapy for aortic valve stenosis with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a case report.","authors":"Xiaoxue Zhang, Shiliang Li, Zijun Chen, Yi Feng, Xiang Wei, Cai Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01194-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01194-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"203-206"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783241/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145147659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still controversial for patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. This multicenter cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of LMCA disease patients who underwent PCI or CABG. We reviewed 875 consecutive patients diagnosed with LMCA disease between January 2009 and December 2020 who underwent coronary revascularization by PCI (n = 404) or CABG (n = 471). A one-to-one propensity score matching was employed to control the potential biases. The primary outcome was any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which were composed of all causes of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Before propensity score matching, both groups significantly differed in essential baseline characteristics. Patients undergoing PCI were significantly older (age 72.4 vs. 70.5 years). They had a better baseline left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 59.1% vs. 55.8%). Moreover, patients in the PCI group had less coronary artery disease burden, such as less frequency of SYNTAX scores ≥ 33 (25.1% vs. 49.0%) and true left main bifurcation disease (18.6% vs. 33.1%). After propensity score analysis, 191 pairs of patients were successfully matched, and the median follow-up time was 4.5 years. A primary outcome event occurred in 8.9% of the patients in the PCI group and 15.2% in the CABG group (HR 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-1.28; P = 0.253). All causes of death were lower in the PCI group than in the CABG group (8.4% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.347), but the difference was insignificant. In PCI and CABG groups, the incidence of cardiovascular death (1.6% vs. 1.1%), myocardial infarction (1.1% vs. 1.1%), and stroke (0% vs. 1.6%) were also not significantly different. However, the incidence of any revascularization and hospitalization for heart failure tended to be higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group, but the difference was not significant. In this propensity-matched study, PCI showed a statistically insignificant difference in all causes of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with CABG for the treatment of LMCA disease. Furthermore, PCI showed no statistically significant difference compared to CABG in overall endpoints, including any revascularization.
对于左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病患者,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的结果仍然存在争议。本多中心队列研究旨在评估LMCA患者行PCI或CABG的临床结果。我们回顾了2009年1月至2020年12月期间诊断为LMCA疾病的875例连续患者,他们接受了PCI (n = 404)或CABG (n = 471)的冠状动脉重建术。采用一对一倾向评分匹配来控制潜在偏差。主要终点是任何主要心脏不良事件(MACE),包括所有死因、心肌梗死或中风。在倾向评分匹配前,两组在基本基线特征上有显著差异。接受PCI的患者明显更老(72.4岁vs 70.5岁)。他们有更好的基线左心室功能(左心室射血分数(LVEF) 59.1%比55.8%)。此外,PCI组患者的冠状动脉疾病负担较轻,如SYNTAX评分≥33(25.1%比49.0%)和真左主干分叉疾病(18.6%比33.1%)的频率较低。经倾向评分分析,191对患者成功匹配,中位随访时间为4.5年。PCI组有8.9%的患者出现主要结局事件,CABG组有15.2% (HR 0.70; 95%可信区间[CI] 0.38-1.28; P = 0.253)。PCI组所有死亡原因均低于CABG组(8.4%比13.6%,P = 0.347),但差异不显著。在PCI组和CABG组中,心血管死亡(1.6% vs. 1.1%)、心肌梗死(1.1% vs. 1.1%)和卒中(0% vs. 1.6%)的发生率也无显著差异。然而,任何血运重建术和心力衰竭住院的发生率在PCI组往往高于CABG组,但差异不显著。在这项倾向匹配的研究中,与CABG相比,PCI在治疗LMCA疾病的所有死因、心肌梗死或卒中方面的差异在统计学上不显著。此外,与CABG相比,PCI在包括任何血运重建术在内的总终点上没有统计学上的显著差异。
{"title":"Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in patient with left main coronary artery disease: the TOkai LEft main RevAscularizatioN sTrategy (TOLERANT) study.","authors":"Thitima Limjaroen, Yoshihisa Kinoshita, Yuki Suzuka, Yoshihiro Goto, Jyunji Yanagisawa, Yoriyasu Suzuki, Hideki Kitamura, Munenori Okubo, Yoshiaki Kawase, Hitoshi Matsuo, Yutaka Koyama, Yasuhide Okawa, Takahiko Suzuki","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01185-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01185-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still controversial for patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. This multicenter cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of LMCA disease patients who underwent PCI or CABG. We reviewed 875 consecutive patients diagnosed with LMCA disease between January 2009 and December 2020 who underwent coronary revascularization by PCI (n = 404) or CABG (n = 471). A one-to-one propensity score matching was employed to control the potential biases. The primary outcome was any major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which were composed of all causes of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Before propensity score matching, both groups significantly differed in essential baseline characteristics. Patients undergoing PCI were significantly older (age 72.4 vs. 70.5 years). They had a better baseline left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 59.1% vs. 55.8%). Moreover, patients in the PCI group had less coronary artery disease burden, such as less frequency of SYNTAX scores ≥ 33 (25.1% vs. 49.0%) and true left main bifurcation disease (18.6% vs. 33.1%). After propensity score analysis, 191 pairs of patients were successfully matched, and the median follow-up time was 4.5 years. A primary outcome event occurred in 8.9% of the patients in the PCI group and 15.2% in the CABG group (HR 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-1.28; P = 0.253). All causes of death were lower in the PCI group than in the CABG group (8.4% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.347), but the difference was insignificant. In PCI and CABG groups, the incidence of cardiovascular death (1.6% vs. 1.1%), myocardial infarction (1.1% vs. 1.1%), and stroke (0% vs. 1.6%) were also not significantly different. However, the incidence of any revascularization and hospitalization for heart failure tended to be higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group, but the difference was not significant. In this propensity-matched study, PCI showed a statistically insignificant difference in all causes of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with CABG for the treatment of LMCA disease. Furthermore, PCI showed no statistically significant difference compared to CABG in overall endpoints, including any revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"48-55"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145022829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01202-w
Susumu Katsushika, Jiro Ando, Takayuki Warisawa
{"title":"Strategic and comprehensive physiology-guided interventions for ischemia in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease.","authors":"Susumu Katsushika, Jiro Ando, Takayuki Warisawa","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01202-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01202-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"200-202"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145124291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The KCB01 (KIZASHI™) is a novel cutting balloon catheter with blades integrally formed with the balloon. It is designed to overcome the drawbacks of conventional cutting balloons in terms of lesion delivery, crossability and procedural complications while maintaining the same dilation capacity. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the KCB01, a prospective, open-label, single-arm study was conducted at nine sites in Japan on percutaneous coronary intervention-eligible patients with stenotic lesions that exhibited residual indentation even after conventional balloon dilation at nominal pressure. Seventy-six patients were enrolled between November 2022 and June 2023, and 73 eligible patients were included in the primary analysis. The mean age was 73.5 ± 7.4 years, and 79.5% of the patients were male. The target lesion characteristics included bifurcation lesions (42.5%), in-stent restenosis lesions (20.5%), and severely calcified lesions (54.8%). The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as the KCB01 crossing the target lesion, no residual indentation, and < 50% residual stenosis rate after KCB01 dilation (assessed using quantitative coronary angiography). The angiographic images obtained during the procedure were evaluated in a core laboratory. The procedural success rate was 87.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.9-94.2), with the lower limit of the 95% CI (77.9%) exceeding the performance goal of 76.5%. Clinical success rate was achieved in 94.5% of cases (95% CI: 86.6-98.5%), with no major adverse cardiac events reported until discharge. Furthermore, no device deficiencies related to the KCB01 were observed. These results suggest the safety and efficacy of the KCB01.
{"title":"A pivotal study on the novel cutting balloon KCB01 in patients with coronary artery disease.","authors":"Yoshisato Shibata, Yoshiaki Ito, Shigeru Nakamura, Koichi Kishi, Yuji Oikawa, Takashi Muramatsu, Gaku Nakazawa, Hisashi Koga, Kenichi Sakakura, Takuya Shida, Masato Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01205-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01205-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The KCB01 (KIZASHI<sup>™</sup>) is a novel cutting balloon catheter with blades integrally formed with the balloon. It is designed to overcome the drawbacks of conventional cutting balloons in terms of lesion delivery, crossability and procedural complications while maintaining the same dilation capacity. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the KCB01, a prospective, open-label, single-arm study was conducted at nine sites in Japan on percutaneous coronary intervention-eligible patients with stenotic lesions that exhibited residual indentation even after conventional balloon dilation at nominal pressure. Seventy-six patients were enrolled between November 2022 and June 2023, and 73 eligible patients were included in the primary analysis. The mean age was 73.5 ± 7.4 years, and 79.5% of the patients were male. The target lesion characteristics included bifurcation lesions (42.5%), in-stent restenosis lesions (20.5%), and severely calcified lesions (54.8%). The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as the KCB01 crossing the target lesion, no residual indentation, and < 50% residual stenosis rate after KCB01 dilation (assessed using quantitative coronary angiography). The angiographic images obtained during the procedure were evaluated in a core laboratory. The procedural success rate was 87.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.9-94.2), with the lower limit of the 95% CI (77.9%) exceeding the performance goal of 76.5%. Clinical success rate was achieved in 94.5% of cases (95% CI: 86.6-98.5%), with no major adverse cardiac events reported until discharge. Furthermore, no device deficiencies related to the KCB01 were observed. These results suggest the safety and efficacy of the KCB01.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12783245/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145306922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}