Pub Date : 2025-11-22DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01214-6
Michele Maremmani, Gabriele Gasparini, Francesco Bruno, Sergio Berti, Simonluca Digiacomo, Ramin Ebrahimi, Christian Templin, Paolo Canova, Gabriele Pesarini, Davide Di Vece
Comparative evidence on treatment strategies for calcified coronary lesions (CCL) remains scarce, with few head-to-head trials and limited data on clinical outcomes. We conducted a frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing excimer laser (ELCA), lithotripsy (IVL), modified balloons (MBA), orbital atherectomy (OA), rotational atherectomy (RA), and RA plus cutting balloons (RA plus CBA) against a conventional strategy (CS). The primary endpoints were severe adverse events (SAE: death, coronary perforation, or slow-flow/no-reflow) and minimum stent area (MSA), while secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Fourteen RCTs including 3,671 patients were analyzed. Atherectomy-based strategies carried a higher risk of SAE versus CS, driven by slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon. All strategies except OA and ELCA significantly increased MSA compared with CS, with the largest effect observed for RA plus CBA (MD 0.93 mm²; 95% CI 0.48-1.38). None of the strategies reduced MACE or TLR versus CS, although RA plus CBA ranked highest for both endpoints. IVL improved MSA (MD 0.59 mm²; 95% CI 0.14-1.03) without increasing SAE and ranked favorably for MACE and TLR, with the highest probability of lower mortality. Stand-alone MBA remained low-ranked for TLR, and sensitivity analysis confirmed its inferior MSA performance versus IVL. In summary, upfront plaque-modification improved MSA compared with a conventional strategy, although this gain did not translate into significant reductions in MACE or TLR, likely reflecting the limited number of events. RA plus CBA had the highest likelihood of lower MACE and TLR despite higher procedural risk, whereas IVL provided the most favorable balance between safety and efficacy.
关于钙化冠状动脉病变(CCL)治疗策略的比较证据仍然很少,很少有正面试验和有限的临床结果数据。我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了频率网络meta分析,比较准分子激光(ELCA)、碎石术(IVL)、改良球囊术(MBA)、眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术(OA)、旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA)和RA +切割球囊术(RA + CBA)与传统策略(CS)。主要终点是严重不良事件(SAE:死亡、冠状动脉穿孔或慢流/无回流)和最小支架面积(MSA),次要终点包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和靶病变血运重建术(TLR)。14项随机对照试验包括3,671例患者。与CS相比,基于动脉粥样硬化切除术的策略具有更高的SAE风险,这是由慢流/无回流现象驱动的。与CS相比,除OA和ELCA外,所有策略均显著增加MSA, RA + CBA效果最大(MD 0.93 mm²;95% CI 0.48-1.38)。与CS相比,没有一种策略降低了MACE或TLR,尽管RA + CBA在两个终点上都是最高的。IVL在不增加SAE的情况下改善了MSA (MD 0.59 mm²;95% CI 0.14-1.03),并且在MACE和TLR中排名有利,死亡率降低的概率最高。独立MBA的TLR排名较低,敏感性分析证实其MSA表现低于IVL。总之,与传统策略相比,前期斑块修饰改善了MSA,尽管这种获益并未转化为MACE或TLR的显著降低,可能反映了事件数量有限。尽管手术风险较高,但RA + CBA最有可能降低MACE和TLR,而IVL在安全性和有效性之间提供了最有利的平衡。
{"title":"Network meta-analysis of treatment strategies for calcified coronary lesions.","authors":"Michele Maremmani, Gabriele Gasparini, Francesco Bruno, Sergio Berti, Simonluca Digiacomo, Ramin Ebrahimi, Christian Templin, Paolo Canova, Gabriele Pesarini, Davide Di Vece","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01214-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01214-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative evidence on treatment strategies for calcified coronary lesions (CCL) remains scarce, with few head-to-head trials and limited data on clinical outcomes. We conducted a frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing excimer laser (ELCA), lithotripsy (IVL), modified balloons (MBA), orbital atherectomy (OA), rotational atherectomy (RA), and RA plus cutting balloons (RA plus CBA) against a conventional strategy (CS). The primary endpoints were severe adverse events (SAE: death, coronary perforation, or slow-flow/no-reflow) and minimum stent area (MSA), while secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Fourteen RCTs including 3,671 patients were analyzed. Atherectomy-based strategies carried a higher risk of SAE versus CS, driven by slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon. All strategies except OA and ELCA significantly increased MSA compared with CS, with the largest effect observed for RA plus CBA (MD 0.93 mm²; 95% CI 0.48-1.38). None of the strategies reduced MACE or TLR versus CS, although RA plus CBA ranked highest for both endpoints. IVL improved MSA (MD 0.59 mm²; 95% CI 0.14-1.03) without increasing SAE and ranked favorably for MACE and TLR, with the highest probability of lower mortality. Stand-alone MBA remained low-ranked for TLR, and sensitivity analysis confirmed its inferior MSA performance versus IVL. In summary, upfront plaque-modification improved MSA compared with a conventional strategy, although this gain did not translate into significant reductions in MACE or TLR, likely reflecting the limited number of events. RA plus CBA had the highest likelihood of lower MACE and TLR despite higher procedural risk, whereas IVL provided the most favorable balance between safety and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01218-2
Haruhito Yuki, Toru Naganuma, Toru Ouchi, Tatsuya Nakao, Koji Hozawa
{"title":"Severe aortic stenosis with an infra-aortic-annular aneurysm of ventricular septum treated with Evolut™ FX.","authors":"Haruhito Yuki, Toru Naganuma, Toru Ouchi, Tatsuya Nakao, Koji Hozawa","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01218-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01218-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), concomitant percutaneous procedures are often limited by difficulty obtaining vascular access. Although prior case reports have described using the ECMO arterial cannula as an access site, the hemodynamic implications are unknown. This in-vitro study examined the effect of direct catheter sheath insertion through the VA-ECMO arterial cannula on circuit hemodynamics. An ECMO circuit was constructed in a water-based bench model with arterial cannula size of 13.5, 15, and 16.5 Fr. We measured flow and pressure changes with the direct Seldinger insertion of 4, 5, 6, and 7 Fr sheaths and catheter into the arterial ECMO cannula, simulating concomitant catheter-based interventions. We demonstrated that sheath insertion consistently reduced circuit flow in a size-dependent manner, requiring higher pump speeds to maintain comparable flow. At the maximum pump speed (3000 rpm), the largest cannula (16.5 Fr) maintained flow rates > 3.0 L/min across all sheath sizes tested, whereas the 15 Fr cannula achieved this only with 4-6 Fr sheaths and the 13.5 Fr cannula only with a 4 Fr sheath. Our findings suggest that certain combinations of ECMO cannula and sheath sizes can preserve adequate perfusion, supporting the feasibility of this simple, reproducible technique under carefully selected conditions. This study provides the first evaluation of flow dynamics for this procedure in a standardized setting. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
{"title":"Hemodynamic implications of direct sheath insertion through VA-ECMO arterial cannula: an In-Vitro model.","authors":"Yasuhiro Otake, Yumeko Ebihara, Haruko Matsumoto, Kayo Shoji, Tomonari M Shimoda, Hidetaka Nishina","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01217-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01217-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), concomitant percutaneous procedures are often limited by difficulty obtaining vascular access. Although prior case reports have described using the ECMO arterial cannula as an access site, the hemodynamic implications are unknown. This in-vitro study examined the effect of direct catheter sheath insertion through the VA-ECMO arterial cannula on circuit hemodynamics. An ECMO circuit was constructed in a water-based bench model with arterial cannula size of 13.5, 15, and 16.5 Fr. We measured flow and pressure changes with the direct Seldinger insertion of 4, 5, 6, and 7 Fr sheaths and catheter into the arterial ECMO cannula, simulating concomitant catheter-based interventions. We demonstrated that sheath insertion consistently reduced circuit flow in a size-dependent manner, requiring higher pump speeds to maintain comparable flow. At the maximum pump speed (3000 rpm), the largest cannula (16.5 Fr) maintained flow rates > 3.0 L/min across all sheath sizes tested, whereas the 15 Fr cannula achieved this only with 4-6 Fr sheaths and the 13.5 Fr cannula only with a 4 Fr sheath. Our findings suggest that certain combinations of ECMO cannula and sheath sizes can preserve adequate perfusion, supporting the feasibility of this simple, reproducible technique under carefully selected conditions. This study provides the first evaluation of flow dynamics for this procedure in a standardized setting. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-05-27DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01142-5
Juan P Sandoval, Eduardo A Arias-Sanchez, José A Arias-Godínez, Veronica C Rodriguez-Esparza, Axel A Rodriguez-Mendez, Hugo Rodriguez-Zanella
{"title":"Fusion imaging-guided closure of spontaneous sinus of Valsalva aneurysm rupture.","authors":"Juan P Sandoval, Eduardo A Arias-Sanchez, José A Arias-Godínez, Veronica C Rodriguez-Esparza, Axel A Rodriguez-Mendez, Hugo Rodriguez-Zanella","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01142-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01142-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1023-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144157011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Enhancement of posterior mitral leaflet imaging quality during the MitraClip procedure using one-lung ventilation.","authors":"Masafumi Sato, Kenji Harada, Koichi Yoshinaga, Koichiro Seki, Koji Kawahito, Kazuomi Kario","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01138-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01138-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1027-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144086086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Iatrogenic laceration of the atrial septum during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a patient with multiple atrial septal defects.","authors":"Koji Nakagawa, Yoichi Takaya, Teiji Akagi, Takashi Miki, Hiroshi Morita, Shinsuke Yuasa","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01163-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01163-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1033-1035"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144473993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-05-27DOI: 10.1007/s12928-025-01144-3
Ahmad Alazzam, Yacoub Aldroubi, Tariq Alhusban, Mosab Said
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) differences between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and how surgical risk stratification and diagnostic criteria influence outcomes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we included both non-randomized studies and randomized clinical trials that reported AKI criteria and patients' surgical risk in patients with aortic stenosis by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until late September. We executed a random-effects model in Review Manager to pool effect estimates of AKI incidence or the need for dialysis as an odds ratio (OR) and I2 heterogeneity, and we utilized R for meta-regression to address any heterogeneity with subgroup analysis for surgical risk, AKI criteria, and study design. We used the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB-1) for risk of bias assessment and GRADE for certainty assessment. Involving 17 studies and a total of 13,777 patients, we found that the AKI incidence was significantly lower in TAVR compared to SAVR (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: [0.30, 0.44], I2 = 55%, P = 0.003), along with the need for dialysis (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: [0.19, 0.63], I2 = 0%, P = 0.92). The study also found that intermediate and low-risk patients had more favorable outcomes. However, the retrospective study design and VARC-2 criteria were associated with unfavorable outcomes. TAVR effectively reduced the risk of AKI in all surgical risk categories and the need for dialysis compared to SAVR in patients with AS.
本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)和经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)在急性肾损伤(AKI)方面的差异,以及手术风险分层和诊断标准如何影响预后。根据PRISMA指南,我们通过检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science纳入了非随机研究和随机临床试验,这些研究报告了主动脉瓣狭窄患者的AKI标准和手术风险。我们在Review Manager中执行了一个随机效应模型,将AKI发生率或透析需求的效应估计汇总为优势比(or)和I2异质性,我们使用R进行meta回归,通过亚组分析处理手术风险、AKI标准和研究设计的任何异质性。我们使用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)和Cochrane偏倚风险工具(rob1)进行偏倚风险评估,GRADE进行确定性评估。纳入17项研究,共13777例患者,我们发现TAVR的AKI发生率明显低于SAVR (OR = 0.36;95% CI: [0.30, 0.44], I2 = 55%, P = 0.003),以及透析需求(OR = 0.35;95% ci: [0.19, 0.63], i2 = 0%, p = 0.92)。研究还发现,中危和低危患者的预后更好。然而,回顾性研究设计和VARC-2标准与不良结果相关。与SAVR相比,TAVR有效降低了所有手术风险类别的AKI风险和AS患者的透析需求。
{"title":"Comprehensive analysis of acute kidney injury incidence following transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13,777 patients.","authors":"Ahmad Alazzam, Yacoub Aldroubi, Tariq Alhusban, Mosab Said","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01144-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01144-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) differences between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and how surgical risk stratification and diagnostic criteria influence outcomes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we included both non-randomized studies and randomized clinical trials that reported AKI criteria and patients' surgical risk in patients with aortic stenosis by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until late September. We executed a random-effects model in Review Manager to pool effect estimates of AKI incidence or the need for dialysis as an odds ratio (OR) and I<sup>2</sup> heterogeneity, and we utilized R for meta-regression to address any heterogeneity with subgroup analysis for surgical risk, AKI criteria, and study design. We used the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB-1) for risk of bias assessment and GRADE for certainty assessment. Involving 17 studies and a total of 13,777 patients, we found that the AKI incidence was significantly lower in TAVR compared to SAVR (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: [0.30, 0.44], I<sup>2</sup> = 55%, P = 0.003), along with the need for dialysis (OR = 0.35; 95% CI: [0.19, 0.63], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, P = 0.92). The study also found that intermediate and low-risk patients had more favorable outcomes. However, the retrospective study design and VARC-2 criteria were associated with unfavorable outcomes. TAVR effectively reduced the risk of AKI in all surgical risk categories and the need for dialysis compared to SAVR in patients with AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"932-942"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144148943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is technically challenging because of the presence of the transcatheter heart valve (THV), which complicates coronary artery engagement. Owing to their flexibility, diagnostic catheters (DCs) facilitate coronary access, but require subsequent exchange to guiding catheters (GCs) for PCI. The feasibility of using an extension wire (EW) to facilitate DC-to-GC exchange in this context remains unexplored. A retrospective analysis was conducted at our institution, examining 11 PCI cases performed after TAVR between January 6, 2020, and June 1, 2024, in which an EW was employed to transition from a DC to a GC. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were reviewed. Procedural success was defined as a successful DC-to-GC exchange and completion of PCI. DC-to-GC exchange using an EW was successfully achieved in all 11 cases (100%). Revascularization was achieved in 10/11 cases (91%). The lesions were uniformly classified as American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Type B2/C. The GCs included Judkins-type in 7/11 cases (64%) and backup-type in 4/11 cases (36%). The THV types included SAPIEN in 6/11 cases (55%), Evolut in 3/11 cases (27%), and Navitor in 2/11 cases (18%). A 6Fr GC was utilized in 10/11 cases (91%), and rotational atherectomy was performed in 1/11 cases (9%). The use of an EW to facilitate the transition from DC to GC in PCI after TAVR resulted in high procedural success, providing a feasible approach for addressing complex lesions and optimizing procedural outcomes.
{"title":"Feasibility of guiding catheter exchange using extension wire in percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Makoto Saigan, Masaki Miyasaka, Daishi Tazawa, Momo Kosuga, Manabu Maeda, Yun Teng, Natsuko Satomi, Yuta Kobayashi, Masaki Nakashima, Yusuke Enta, Yoshiko Munehisa, Yukihiro Hayatsu, Norio Tada","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01159-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12928-025-01159-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is technically challenging because of the presence of the transcatheter heart valve (THV), which complicates coronary artery engagement. Owing to their flexibility, diagnostic catheters (DCs) facilitate coronary access, but require subsequent exchange to guiding catheters (GCs) for PCI. The feasibility of using an extension wire (EW) to facilitate DC-to-GC exchange in this context remains unexplored. A retrospective analysis was conducted at our institution, examining 11 PCI cases performed after TAVR between January 6, 2020, and June 1, 2024, in which an EW was employed to transition from a DC to a GC. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were reviewed. Procedural success was defined as a successful DC-to-GC exchange and completion of PCI. DC-to-GC exchange using an EW was successfully achieved in all 11 cases (100%). Revascularization was achieved in 10/11 cases (91%). The lesions were uniformly classified as American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Type B2/C. The GCs included Judkins-type in 7/11 cases (64%) and backup-type in 4/11 cases (36%). The THV types included SAPIEN in 6/11 cases (55%), Evolut in 3/11 cases (27%), and Navitor in 2/11 cases (18%). A 6Fr GC was utilized in 10/11 cases (91%), and rotational atherectomy was performed in 1/11 cases (9%). The use of an EW to facilitate the transition from DC to GC in PCI after TAVR resulted in high procedural success, providing a feasible approach for addressing complex lesions and optimizing procedural outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"820-826"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144473992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}