Cardiology and Therapy最新文献

Introduction: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a pivotal role in regulating blood pressure (BP), with dysregulation of RAAS resulting in hypertension and potentially heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), cardio-renal syndrome, and stroke. RAAS inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), have advantages beyond BP control. However, differences between these two drug classes need to be considered when choosing a therapy for preventing cardiovascular events.

Methods: A panel of 36 Egyptian cardiologists developed consensus statements on RAAS inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular outcomes and stroke, using a modified three-step Delphi process.

Results: The consensus statements highlight the importance of effective BP control and the role of RAAS blockade for prevention and management of various cardiovascular diseases. ACEis and ARBs differ in their mode of action and, thus, clinical effects. On the basis of available evidence, the consensus group recommended the following: ACEis should be considered as first choice (in preference to ARBs) to reduce the risk of MI, for primary prevention of HF, and for secondary prevention of stroke. ACEis and ARBs show equivalent efficacy for the primary prevention of stroke. Evidence also favors the preferential use of ACEis in patients with type 2 diabetes, for BP control, for the primary prevention of diabetic kidney disease, and to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Treatment with an ACEi should be started within 24 h of ST segment elevation MI (and continued long term) in patients with HF, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and/or diabetes. Angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) are the first choice for patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction, with ACEis being the second choice in this group. ARBs are indicated as alternatives in patients who cannot tolerate ACEis. ACEis may be associated with cough development, but the incidence tends to be overestimated, and the risk can be reduced by use of a lipophilic ACEi or combining the ACEi with a calcium channel blocker.

Conclusion: RAAS blockade is an essential component of hypertension therapy; however, the protective effects provided by ACEis are superior to those of ARBs. Therefore, an ACEi is indicated in almost all cases, unless not tolerated.

Introduction: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluate the effectiveness of the potassium (K⁺) binder sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in maintaining normokalemia and facilitating the initiation, optimization, and maintenance of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods: A total of 44 patients with HFrEF and a history of hyperkalemia who were receiving SZC to enable the prescription of RAASi were identified from two district general hospital sites. Retrospective analysis was performed to determine biochemical response, alterations in pharmacotherapy, and subsequent HF outcomes following initiation of SZC.

Results: Mean K⁺ was reduced by 0.9 mmol/L within 1 month of initiation of SZC; mean K⁺ after 12 months of treatment was 4.8 mmol/L with a median (interquartile range) duration of treatment of 13 (8.4-15.1) months. Following SZC treatment, 100% of patients received an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (18% increase) and 93% received a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (41% increase), with 59% and 37% achieving guideline-recommended dosing, respectively. Ninety-one percent of patients were able to receive triple or quadruple therapy with the addition of a beta-blocker and a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor. Reduced rates of hospitalization for HF (HHF) were observed with 12 episodes per 100 patient-years recorded (reduced from 21) in addition to improvements in mean left ventricular ejection fraction (29-36%) and median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (3458-2055 ng/L, 45% median reduction). Renal function (creatinine clearance increased from 48.4 to 49.3 ml/min) and systolic blood pressure (decreased from 124 to 122 mmHg) were similar following optimization, and no tolerability issues were identified.

Conclusions: Extended real-world treatment with the K⁺ binder SZC was effective at maintaining normokalemia, and was associated with a greater uptake of RAASi, a reduced rate of HHF, and improvements in cardiac biomarkers in patients with HFrEF.

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose adjustment is based on age, renal function, and body weight. There is a paucity of data describing the factors associated with the prescription of inappropriate dosage and their impact on clinical outcomes among patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods: In a single-center study, 432 patients who were on long-term DOAC therapy and underwent TAVI between 2015 and 2022 were included. We analyzed the predictors and outcomes of inappropriate dosing of DOACs; namely apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. A composite endpoint, including all-cause mortality, life-threatening/major bleeding, stroke, peripheral thromboembolic complications, or myocardial infarction, was assessed after 1 year.

Results: In this TAVI cohort, inappropriate DOAC dosing was observed in 20.6% of patients. Inappropriate DOAC dosage was related to female gender (adj. odds ratio [OR] 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-4.51, p < 0.001) as well as lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (adj. OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, p = 0.019), and to the administration of non-rivaroxaban DOACs (adj. OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16-0.50, p < 0.001). After 1 year, patients on both appropriate and inappropriate DOAC dosage exhibited comparable rates of the composite endpoint (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-1.46, p = 0.622). Old age (adj. OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10, p = 0.018) as well as anemia (adj. OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99, p = 0.031) emerged as independent predictors of the composite endpoint.

Conclusions: In this TAVI cohort, female gender and renal insufficiency were associated with inappropriate DOAC dosage, whereas rivaroxaban was linked to appropriate dosing. Inadequate DOAC dosage did not translate into a worse outcome in our TAVI population.

Trial registration: Prospective Segeberg TAVI Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03192774).

Direct oral anticoagulants have a dose-dependent increased bleeding risk which limits use in certain populations. Studies in both animals and humans with inherited variations in factor XI levels provide a theoretical basis for a drug target capable of addressing current unmet needs. Milvexian is an oral factor XIa inhibitor that has the potential to provide robust anticoagulant effect without increased bleeding compared with current standard of care. Several key studies in the preclinical, phase I, and phase II stages have reported promising safety data in venous thromboembolism and stroke prevention without compromising hemostasis. The planned phase III trials will examine the efficacy of milvexian for prevention of thrombotic events in patients with acute stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and atrial fibrillation.

Introduction: Data on real-world clinical practice and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with congenital heart disease (CHD) are scarce. The OPUS/OrPHeUS studies enrolled patients with PAH newly initiating macitentan, including those with PAH associated with CHD (CHD-PAH).

Methods: OPUS was a prospective, United States, multicenter, long-term, observational drug registry (April 2014-June 2020). OrPHeUS was a retrospective, United States, multicenter medical chart review (October 2013-March 2017). The characteristics, treatment patterns, safety, and outcomes during macitentan treatment of patients with CHD-PAH and the subgroups Eisenmenger syndrome, left-to-right shunts and small/coincidental CHD were descriptively compared.

Results: The combined OPUS/OrPHeUS population included 272 (6.1%) patients with CHD-PAH (80 patients with Eisenmenger syndrome; 82 patients with left-to-right shunts and 92 patients with small/coincidental defects). Most patients across the CHD-PAH subgroups were in World Health Organization Functional Class II/III (82.9-94.6%). Macitentan was initiated as combination therapy in 65.0% of patients with CHD-PAH. During follow-up, 81.4% of patients experienced ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), the most common being dyspnea (23.5%), nausea (13.7%), dizziness (12.7%), headache (12.7%) and edema (10.8%). The 1- and 2-year Kaplan-Meier (95% confidence limits) estimates of patients with CHD-PAH being free from hospitalization were 64.5% (57.9, 70.4) and 49.3% (41.9, 56.3); for survival, the 1- and 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates were 93.5% (89.3, 96.1) and 90.2% (84.9, 93.7).

Conclusions: Macitentan was used in clinical practice in patients with CHD-PAH and its subgroups, including as combination therapy in the majority of patients. Safety in this population was consistent with the known profile of macitentan.

Trial registration: OPsumit^® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; Opsumit^® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688; URL www.

Clinicaltrials: gov .

Introduction: The ROsulord® sAfety for patients with Dyslipidemia study (ROAD study) in the Republic of Korea investigated the safety and efficacy of rosuvastatin in routine clinical practice.

Methods: This non-interventional, multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted over a period of approximately 4.6 years and involved 14,243 participants. During this study, we assessed the adverse events, changes in laboratory test results, and efficacy endpoints associated with rosuvastatin use.

Results: The findings revealed a notably low adverse event rate of 1.63%, indicating a favorable safety profile for rosuvastatin in the management of dyslipidemia. Importantly, no clinically significant incidences of statin-associated myopathy, hepatotoxicity, or diabetes were observed during the study period. Moreover, this study demonstrated significant improvements in lipid profiles among patients receiving rosuvastatin treatment, with a reduction in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. These improvements contributed to a lower cardiovascular risk in the study population.

Conclusion: Overall, these findings suggest that rosuvastatin is safe and effective in managing dyslipidemia in real-world clinical settings, providing clinicians with valuable insights into the benefits and risks associated with statin therapy in this patient population.

Introduction: Guidelines recommend that patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) represented by low-risk deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) receive initial treatment at home versus at the hospital, but a large percentage of these patients are not managed at home. This study assessed the effectiveness of a quality intervention on provider knowledge and confidence in evaluating outpatient treatment for patients with VTE in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: A pilot program to overcome obstacles to outpatient VTE treatment in appropriate patients was initiated at Baylor Scott & White Health Temple ED. Subsequently, a formalized quality intervention with a targeted educational program was developed and delivered to ED providers. Provider surveys were administered pre- and post-quality intervention in order to assess clinical knowledge, confidence levels, and perceived barriers. Patient discharge information was extracted from electronic health records.

Results: Twenty-five ED providers completed the pre- and post-surveys; 690 and 356 patients with VTE were included in the pre- and post-pilot and pre- and post-quality intervention periods, respectively. Many ED providers reported that a major barrier to discharging patients to outpatient care was the lack of available and adequate patient follow-up appointments. Notably, after the quality intervention, an increase in provider clinical knowledge and confidence scores was observed. Discharge rates for patients with VTE increased from 25.6% to 27.5% after the pilot intervention and increased from 28.5% to 29.9% after the quality intervention, but these differences were not statistically significant. Despite instantaneous uptick in discharge rates after the interventions, there was not a long-lasting effect.

Conclusion: Although the quality intervention led to improvements in provider clinical knowledge and confidence and identified barriers to discharging patients with VTE, discharge rates remained stable, underscoring the need for additional endeavors.

Introduction: Coronary sclerosis is a risk factor for the progression to obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, understanding its impact on the outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries is limited. This study aimed to explore the prognostic influence of coronary sclerosis on in- and out-of-hospital events in troponin-positive patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries.

Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis based on prospectively collected data. A total of 24,775 patients who underwent coronary angiography from 2010 to 2021 in a German university hospital were screened, resulting in a final study cohort of 373 troponin-positive patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries and a follow-up period of 6.2 ± 3.1 years. Coronary sclerosis was defined as coronary plaques without angiographically detectable stenotic lesions of 50% or more in the large epicardial coronary arteries. The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of in-hospital events. Secondary endpoints included events during follow-up.

Results: Patients with coronary sclerosis were significantly older (70 ± 12 vs. 58 ± 16 years, p < 0.001), had ST-segment elevation less frequently on electrocardiogram (9.4% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.013), and suffered more often from diabetes mellitus (23.3% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.009), arterial hypertension (79.6% vs. 59.8%, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (17.1% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.028), chronic kidney disease (22.2% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (19.8% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.045), and valvular diseases than patients without CAD. Patients with coronary sclerosis were more likely to receive medication for primary/secondary prevention on admission and at discharge. The incidence of in- and out-of-hospital events was significantly higher in patients with coronary sclerosis (in-hospital: 42.8% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.010; out-of-hospital: 46.0% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). Mortality rates tended to be higher in the coronary sclerosis group (29.4% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.066).

Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with coronary sclerosis presented a higher incidence of comorbidities and increased medication use, and experienced higher rates of both in-hospital and out-of-hospital events, primarily due to the clustering of cardiovascular risk factors.

Introduction: The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to low-risk and younger patients has increased the relevance of the long-term durability of transcatheter heart valves (THV). The present study aims to assess the 10-year durability, hemodynamic performance, and clinical outcomes after TAVI using the CoreValve system.

Methods: An analysis from a prospective registry with predefined clinical and echocardiographic follow-up included 302 patients who underwent TAVI with the CoreValve system between 2007 and 2015. Bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) was defined as any bioprosthetic valve dysfunction-related death, re-intervention, or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration.

Results: At the time of TAVI, the mean age was 80.41 ± 7.01 years, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 6.13 ± 5.23%. At latest follow-up (median [IQR]: 5 [2-7] years), cumulative all-cause mortality rates at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years was 23.7%, 40%, 65.8%, and 89.8%, respectively. Mean aortic valve area and transvalvular gradient post-TAVI and at 5, 7, and 10 years were 1.94, 1.87, 1.69, and 1.98 cm² (p = 0.236) and 8.3, 9.0, 8.2, and 10.1 mmHg (p = 0.796), respectively. Overall, 11 patients had BVF, of whom six had structural valve deterioration (SVD). The 10-year actual and actuarial freedom from BVF was 96.1% and 78.8%, and from SVD was 97.9% and 80.9%, respectively. Three patients developed significant non-SVD due to severe paravalvular leakage, and two patients were diagnosed with infective endocarditis.

Conclusion: Using an early-generation self-expanding bioprosthesis, we documented durable hemodynamic performance and low rates of BVF and SVD up to 10 years after TAVI.