Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2024-01-28DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00345-2
Adam Torbicki, Richard Channick, Nazzareno Galiè, David G Kiely, Pamela Moceri, Andrew Peacock, Andrew J Swift, Ahmed Tawakol, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, Dayana Flores, Nicolas Martin, Stephan Rosenkranz
Introduction: The aim of this sub-study was to evaluate the relationship between echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) variables and to utilize echo to assess the effect of macitentan on right ventricle (RV) structure and function.
Methods: REPAIR (NCT02310672) was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, 52-week, phase 4 study in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients, which investigated the effect of macitentan 10 mg as monotherapy, or in combination with a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, on RV structure, function, and hemodynamics using cMRI and right heart catheterization. In this sub-study, patients were also assessed by echo at screening and at weeks 26 and/or 52. Post hoc correlation analyses between echo and cMRI variables were performed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analyses.
Results: The Echo sub-study included 45 patients. Improvements in echo-assessed RV stroke volume (RVSV), left ventricular SV (LVSV), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and in 2D global longitudinal RV strain (2D GLRVS) were observed at weeks 26 and 52 compared to baseline. There was a strong correlation between echo (LVSV, 2D GLRVS, and LVEDV) and cMRI variables, with a moderate correlation for RVSV. Bland-Altman analyses showed a good agreement for LVSV measured by echo versus cMRI, whereas an overestimation in echo-assessed RVSV was observed compared to cMRI (bias of - 15 mL). Hemodynamic and functional variables, as well as safety, were comparable between the Echo sub-study and REPAIR.
Conclusions: A good relationship between relevant echo and cMRI parameters was shown. Improvements in RV structure and function with macitentan treatment was observed by echo, consistent with results observed by cMRI in the primary analysis of the REPAIR study. Echo is a valuable complementary method to cMRI, with the potential to non-invasively monitor treatment response at follow-up.
{"title":"Effect of Macitentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and the Relationship Between Echocardiography and cMRI Variables: REPAIR Echocardiography Sub-study Results.","authors":"Adam Torbicki, Richard Channick, Nazzareno Galiè, David G Kiely, Pamela Moceri, Andrew Peacock, Andrew J Swift, Ahmed Tawakol, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, Dayana Flores, Nicolas Martin, Stephan Rosenkranz","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00345-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00345-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this sub-study was to evaluate the relationship between echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) variables and to utilize echo to assess the effect of macitentan on right ventricle (RV) structure and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>REPAIR (NCT02310672) was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, 52-week, phase 4 study in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients, which investigated the effect of macitentan 10 mg as monotherapy, or in combination with a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, on RV structure, function, and hemodynamics using cMRI and right heart catheterization. In this sub-study, patients were also assessed by echo at screening and at weeks 26 and/or 52. Post hoc correlation analyses between echo and cMRI variables were performed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Echo sub-study included 45 patients. Improvements in echo-assessed RV stroke volume (RVSV), left ventricular SV (LVSV), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and in 2D global longitudinal RV strain (2D GLRVS) were observed at weeks 26 and 52 compared to baseline. There was a strong correlation between echo (LVSV, 2D GLRVS, and LVEDV) and cMRI variables, with a moderate correlation for RVSV. Bland-Altman analyses showed a good agreement for LVSV measured by echo versus cMRI, whereas an overestimation in echo-assessed RVSV was observed compared to cMRI (bias of - 15 mL). Hemodynamic and functional variables, as well as safety, were comparable between the Echo sub-study and REPAIR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A good relationship between relevant echo and cMRI parameters was shown. Improvements in RV structure and function with macitentan treatment was observed by echo, consistent with results observed by cMRI in the primary analysis of the REPAIR study. Echo is a valuable complementary method to cMRI, with the potential to non-invasively monitor treatment response at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>REPAIR NCT02310672.</p>","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"173-190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139569883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2024-02-10DOI: 10.1007/s40119-024-00351-y
Henrietta Afari, Megan Sheehan, Nosheen Reza
Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity in the United States, and maternal mortality has increased over the last decade. Pregnancy and the postpartum period are associated with significant vascular, metabolic, and physiologic adaptations that can unmask new heart failure or exacerbate heart failure symptoms in women with known underlying cardiomyopathy. There are unique management considerations for heart failure in women throughout pregnancy, and it is imperative that clinicians caring for pregnant women understand these important principles. Early involvement of multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics teams is key to optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes. In this review, we discuss the unique challenges and opportunities in the diagnosis of heart failure in pregnancy, management principles along the continuum of pregnancy, and the safety of heart failure therapies during and after pregnancy.
{"title":"Contemporary Management of Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure in Pregnancy.","authors":"Henrietta Afari, Megan Sheehan, Nosheen Reza","doi":"10.1007/s40119-024-00351-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-024-00351-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity in the United States, and maternal mortality has increased over the last decade. Pregnancy and the postpartum period are associated with significant vascular, metabolic, and physiologic adaptations that can unmask new heart failure or exacerbate heart failure symptoms in women with known underlying cardiomyopathy. There are unique management considerations for heart failure in women throughout pregnancy, and it is imperative that clinicians caring for pregnant women understand these important principles. Early involvement of multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics teams is key to optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes. In this review, we discuss the unique challenges and opportunities in the diagnosis of heart failure in pregnancy, management principles along the continuum of pregnancy, and the safety of heart failure therapies during and after pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"17-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899150/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139715873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-12-06DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00343-4
Martin Borlich, Uwe Zeymer, Harm Wienbergen, Hans-Peter Hobbach, Alessandro Cuneo, Raffi Bekeredjian, Oliver Ritter, Birgit Hailer, Klaus Hertting, Marcus Hennersdorf, Werner Scholtz, Peter Lanzer, Harald Mudra, Markus Schwefer, Peter-Lothar Schwimmbeck, Christoph Liebetrau, Holger Thiele, Christoph Claas, Thomas Riemer, Ralf Zahn, Leon Iden, Gert Richardt, Ralph Toelg
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The preference for using transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is based on evidence suggesting that TRA is associated with less bleeding and fewer vascular complications, shorter hospital stays, improved quality of life, and a potential beneficial effect on mortality. We have limited study data comparing the two access routes in a patient population with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PCI, who have a particular increased risk of bleeding, while AF itself is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the RIVA-PCI registry, which includes patients with AF undergoing PCI, we analyzed a high-bleeding-risk (HBR) cohort. These patients were predominantly on oral anticoagulants (OAC) for AF, and the PCI was performed via radial or femoral access. Endpoints examined were in-hospital bleeding (BARC 2-5), cerebral events (TIA, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke) and coronary events (stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1636 patients, 854 (52.2%) underwent TFA, while 782 (47.8%) underwent the procedure via TRA, including nine patients with brachial artery puncture. The mean age was 75.5 years. Groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, AF type, cardiovascular history, risk factors, and comorbidities, except for a higher incidence of previous bypass surgeries, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min in the TFA group. No clinically relevant differences in antithrombotic therapy and combinations were present at the time of PCI. However, upon discharge, transradial PCI patients had a higher rate of triple therapy, while dual therapy was preferred after transfemoral procedures. Radial access was more frequently chosen for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP) cases (NSTEMI 26.6% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.0001; UAP 21.5% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001), while femoral access was more common for elective PCI (60.3% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.0001). No differences were observed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Both groups had similar rates of cerebral events (TFA 0.2% vs. TRA 0.3%, p = 0.93), but the TFA group had a higher incidence of bleeding (BARC 2-5) (4.2% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.01), mainly driven by BARC 3 bleeding (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction (TFA 0.2% vs. TRA 0.3%, p = 0.93; TFA 0.4% vs. TRA 0.1%, p = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In HBR patients with AF undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary syndrome, the use of TRA might be associated with a decrease in in-hospital bleeding, while not increasing the risk of embolic or ischemic events compared to femoral access. Further studies are required to confirm these prelim
{"title":"Impact of Access Site on Periprocedural Bleeding and Cerebral and Coronary Events in High-Bleeding-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the RIVA-PCI Trial.","authors":"Martin Borlich, Uwe Zeymer, Harm Wienbergen, Hans-Peter Hobbach, Alessandro Cuneo, Raffi Bekeredjian, Oliver Ritter, Birgit Hailer, Klaus Hertting, Marcus Hennersdorf, Werner Scholtz, Peter Lanzer, Harald Mudra, Markus Schwefer, Peter-Lothar Schwimmbeck, Christoph Liebetrau, Holger Thiele, Christoph Claas, Thomas Riemer, Ralf Zahn, Leon Iden, Gert Richardt, Ralph Toelg","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00343-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00343-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The preference for using transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) in patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is based on evidence suggesting that TRA is associated with less bleeding and fewer vascular complications, shorter hospital stays, improved quality of life, and a potential beneficial effect on mortality. We have limited study data comparing the two access routes in a patient population with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PCI, who have a particular increased risk of bleeding, while AF itself is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the RIVA-PCI registry, which includes patients with AF undergoing PCI, we analyzed a high-bleeding-risk (HBR) cohort. These patients were predominantly on oral anticoagulants (OAC) for AF, and the PCI was performed via radial or femoral access. Endpoints examined were in-hospital bleeding (BARC 2-5), cerebral events (TIA, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke) and coronary events (stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1636 patients, 854 (52.2%) underwent TFA, while 782 (47.8%) underwent the procedure via TRA, including nine patients with brachial artery puncture. The mean age was 75.5 years. Groups were similar in terms of age, sex distribution, AF type, cardiovascular history, risk factors, and comorbidities, except for a higher incidence of previous bypass surgeries, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min in the TFA group. No clinically relevant differences in antithrombotic therapy and combinations were present at the time of PCI. However, upon discharge, transradial PCI patients had a higher rate of triple therapy, while dual therapy was preferred after transfemoral procedures. Radial access was more frequently chosen for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP) cases (NSTEMI 26.6% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.0001; UAP 21.5% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001), while femoral access was more common for elective PCI (60.3% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.0001). No differences were observed for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Both groups had similar rates of cerebral events (TFA 0.2% vs. TRA 0.3%, p = 0.93), but the TFA group had a higher incidence of bleeding (BARC 2-5) (4.2% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.01), mainly driven by BARC 3 bleeding (1.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction (TFA 0.2% vs. TRA 0.3%, p = 0.93; TFA 0.4% vs. TRA 0.1%, p = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In HBR patients with AF undergoing PCI for acute or chronic coronary syndrome, the use of TRA might be associated with a decrease in in-hospital bleeding, while not increasing the risk of embolic or ischemic events compared to femoral access. Further studies are required to confirm these prelim","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"89-101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138486811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2024-01-09DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00347-0
Armaun D Rouhi, Yazid K Ghanem, Laman Yolchieva, Zena Saleh, Hansa Joshi, Matthew C Moccia, Alejandro Suarez-Pierre, Jason J Han
Introduction: The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) dialogue platforms and large language models (LLMs) may help facilitate ongoing efforts to improve health literacy. Additionally, recent studies have highlighted inadequate health literacy among patients with cardiac disease. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether two freely available generative AI dialogue platforms could rewrite online aortic stenosis (AS) patient education materials (PEMs) to meet recommended reading skill levels for the public.
Methods: Online PEMs were gathered from a professional cardiothoracic surgical society and academic institutions in the USA. PEMs were then inputted into two AI-powered LLMs, ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard, with the prompt "translate to 5th-grade reading level". Readability of PEMs before and after AI conversion was measured using the validated Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOGI), and Gunning-Fog Index (GFI) scores.
Results: Overall, 21 PEMs on AS were gathered. Original readability measures indicated difficult readability at the 10th-12th grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 successfully improved readability across all four measures (p < 0.001) to the approximately 6th-7th grade reading level. Bard successfully improved readability across all measures (p < 0.001) except for SMOGI (p = 0.729) to the approximately 8th-9th grade level. Neither platform generated PEMs written below the recommended 6th-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 demonstrated significantly more favorable post-conversion readability scores, percentage change in readability scores, and conversion time compared to Bard (all p < 0.001).
Conclusion: AI dialogue platforms can enhance the readability of PEMs for patients with AS but may not fully meet recommended reading skill levels, highlighting potential tools to help strengthen cardiac health literacy in the future.
{"title":"Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Aortic Stenosis? A Pilot Study.","authors":"Armaun D Rouhi, Yazid K Ghanem, Laman Yolchieva, Zena Saleh, Hansa Joshi, Matthew C Moccia, Alejandro Suarez-Pierre, Jason J Han","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00347-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00347-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) dialogue platforms and large language models (LLMs) may help facilitate ongoing efforts to improve health literacy. Additionally, recent studies have highlighted inadequate health literacy among patients with cardiac disease. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether two freely available generative AI dialogue platforms could rewrite online aortic stenosis (AS) patient education materials (PEMs) to meet recommended reading skill levels for the public.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online PEMs were gathered from a professional cardiothoracic surgical society and academic institutions in the USA. PEMs were then inputted into two AI-powered LLMs, ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard, with the prompt \"translate to 5th-grade reading level\". Readability of PEMs before and after AI conversion was measured using the validated Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOGI), and Gunning-Fog Index (GFI) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 21 PEMs on AS were gathered. Original readability measures indicated difficult readability at the 10th-12th grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 successfully improved readability across all four measures (p < 0.001) to the approximately 6th-7th grade reading level. Bard successfully improved readability across all measures (p < 0.001) except for SMOGI (p = 0.729) to the approximately 8th-9th grade level. Neither platform generated PEMs written below the recommended 6th-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5 demonstrated significantly more favorable post-conversion readability scores, percentage change in readability scores, and conversion time compared to Bard (all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI dialogue platforms can enhance the readability of PEMs for patients with AS but may not fully meet recommended reading skill levels, highlighting potential tools to help strengthen cardiac health literacy in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"137-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899139/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139402020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-12-20DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00344-3
Juan González-Moreno, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Grogan, Teresa Coelho, Ivailo Tournev, Márcia Waddington-Cruz, Jonas Wixner, Igor Diemberger, Pablo Garcia-Pavia, Doug Chapman, Pritam Gupta, Oliver Glass, Leslie Amass
Introduction: Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR amyloidosis) is primarily associated with a cardiac or neurologic phenotype, but a mixed phenotype is increasingly described.
Methods: This study describes the mixed phenotype cohort in the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS). THAOS is an ongoing, longitudinal, observational survey of patients with ATTR amyloidosis, including both hereditary (ATTRv) and wild-type disease, and asymptomatic carriers of pathogenic transthyretin variants. Baseline characteristics of patients with a mixed phenotype (at enrollment or reclassified during follow-up) are described (data cutoff: January 4, 2022).
Results: Approximately one-third of symptomatic patients (n = 1185/3542; 33.5%) were classified at enrollment or follow-up as mixed phenotype (median age, 66.5 years). Of those, 344 (29.0%) were reclassified to mixed phenotype within a median 1-2 years of follow-up. Most patients with mixed phenotype had ATTRv amyloidosis (75.7%). The most frequent genotypes were V30M (38.9%) and wild type (24.3%).
Conclusions: These THAOS data represent the largest analysis of a real-world mixed phenotype ATTR amyloidosis population to date and suggest that a mixed phenotype may be more prevalent than previously thought. Patients may also migrate from a primarily neurologic or cardiologic presentation to a mixed phenotype over time. These data reinforce the need for multidisciplinary evaluation at initial assessment and follow-up of all patients with ATTR amyloidosis.
{"title":"Clinical and Genotype Characteristics and Symptom Migration in Patients With Mixed Phenotype Transthyretin Amyloidosis from the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey.","authors":"Juan González-Moreno, Angela Dispenzieri, Martha Grogan, Teresa Coelho, Ivailo Tournev, Márcia Waddington-Cruz, Jonas Wixner, Igor Diemberger, Pablo Garcia-Pavia, Doug Chapman, Pritam Gupta, Oliver Glass, Leslie Amass","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00344-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00344-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR amyloidosis) is primarily associated with a cardiac or neurologic phenotype, but a mixed phenotype is increasingly described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study describes the mixed phenotype cohort in the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS). THAOS is an ongoing, longitudinal, observational survey of patients with ATTR amyloidosis, including both hereditary (ATTRv) and wild-type disease, and asymptomatic carriers of pathogenic transthyretin variants. Baseline characteristics of patients with a mixed phenotype (at enrollment or reclassified during follow-up) are described (data cutoff: January 4, 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately one-third of symptomatic patients (n = 1185/3542; 33.5%) were classified at enrollment or follow-up as mixed phenotype (median age, 66.5 years). Of those, 344 (29.0%) were reclassified to mixed phenotype within a median 1-2 years of follow-up. Most patients with mixed phenotype had ATTRv amyloidosis (75.7%). The most frequent genotypes were V30M (38.9%) and wild type (24.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These THAOS data represent the largest analysis of a real-world mixed phenotype ATTR amyloidosis population to date and suggest that a mixed phenotype may be more prevalent than previously thought. Patients may also migrate from a primarily neurologic or cardiologic presentation to a mixed phenotype over time. These data reinforce the need for multidisciplinary evaluation at initial assessment and follow-up of all patients with ATTR amyloidosis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00628745.</p>","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"117-135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10899146/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138797812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-07DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00341-6
F. V. van Driest, A. Broersen, Rob J. van der Geest, J. Wouter Jukema, A. Scholte, Jouke Dijkstra
{"title":"Automatic Quantification of Local Plaque Thickness Differences as Assessed by Serial Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Scan-Quality-Based Vessel-Specific Thresholds","authors":"F. V. van Driest, A. Broersen, Rob J. van der Geest, J. Wouter Jukema, A. Scholte, Jouke Dijkstra","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00341-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-023-00341-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":"57 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138593527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00330-9
Miki Imura, Jun Katada, Taro Shiga
{"title":"Correction to: Epidemiological Study Regarding the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Cancer Remission.","authors":"Miki Imura, Jun Katada, Taro Shiga","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00330-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00330-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10703750/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41123183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-08-31DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00328-3
Sarah Badger, James McVeigh, Praveen Indraratna
The guidelines released by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (ACC/AHA/HFSA) in 2022 and those released in 2021 by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) play a crucial role in offering evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF). This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of these guidelines, incorporating insights from relevant clinical trials. While there is considerable alignment between the two sets of guidelines, certain notable differences arise due to variations in publication timelines, which we will outline. By presenting this summary, our objective is to empower clinicians to make informed decisions regarding HF management in their own practice, and facilitate the development of more harmonized guidelines in the future.
{"title":"Summary and Comparison of the 2022 ACC/AHA/HFSA and 2021 ESC Heart Failure Guidelines.","authors":"Sarah Badger, James McVeigh, Praveen Indraratna","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00328-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00328-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The guidelines released by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (ACC/AHA/HFSA) in 2022 and those released in 2021 by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) play a crucial role in offering evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF). This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of these guidelines, incorporating insights from relevant clinical trials. While there is considerable alignment between the two sets of guidelines, certain notable differences arise due to variations in publication timelines, which we will outline. By presenting this summary, our objective is to empower clinicians to make informed decisions regarding HF management in their own practice, and facilitate the development of more harmonized guidelines in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"571-588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10132053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This manuscript aims to critically evaluate the current evidence regarding adverse cardiovascular effects associated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It also provides guidance for the selection of the most appropriate PPI within the context of cardiovascular polypharmacy and emphasizes the importance of establishing consensus among clinicians on the need to prescribe PPIs with limited cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme inhibition to reduce the risk of drug interactions. PPIs are among the most widely used drugs for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the prevention of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The manuscript reports the proceedings from the first practice recommendations meeting on the cardiovascular compatibility of PPIs in an Indian setting. A panel of eight Indian experts in cardiology and gastroenterology reviewed 14 consensus statements. Available literature was searched and summarized, and after multiple rounds of review, consensus was achieved for these statements. Based on the available evidence, the consensus panel highlights that a PPI with minimal drug-drug interaction (DDI) is recommended, especially in patients requiring clopidogrel or polypharmacy. Rabeprazole appears to be a good option in cases where co-prescription is indicated, owing to its optimal acid suppression and minimal drug interaction profile.
{"title":"Cardiovascular Compatibility of Proton Pump Inhibitors: Practice Recommendations.","authors":"Jamshed Dalal, Anjan Lal Dutta, Jagdish Hiremath, Shamanna Seshadri Iyengar, Jagadish Chander Mohan, Abraham Ooman, Bhabadev Goswami, Kotacherry Thrivikrama Shenoy","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00338-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00338-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This manuscript aims to critically evaluate the current evidence regarding adverse cardiovascular effects associated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It also provides guidance for the selection of the most appropriate PPI within the context of cardiovascular polypharmacy and emphasizes the importance of establishing consensus among clinicians on the need to prescribe PPIs with limited cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme inhibition to reduce the risk of drug interactions. PPIs are among the most widely used drugs for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the prevention of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The manuscript reports the proceedings from the first practice recommendations meeting on the cardiovascular compatibility of PPIs in an Indian setting. A panel of eight Indian experts in cardiology and gastroenterology reviewed 14 consensus statements. Available literature was searched and summarized, and after multiple rounds of review, consensus was achieved for these statements. Based on the available evidence, the consensus panel highlights that a PPI with minimal drug-drug interaction (DDI) is recommended, especially in patients requiring clopidogrel or polypharmacy. Rabeprazole appears to be a good option in cases where co-prescription is indicated, owing to its optimal acid suppression and minimal drug interaction profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"557-570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10703758/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72013580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment that rapidly reverses the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, was approved in Japan in September 2016, at which time an all-case, postmarketing surveillance (PMS) study was initiated to collect data on idarucizumab in Japanese patients. Interim results were published previously, and the final results are reported herein.
Methods: This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, non-interventional PMS study was conducted in Japanese patients who received idarucizumab at the approved dose (2 × 2.5 g/50 ml) and had uncontrolled bleeding (group A) or required an emergency procedure (group B). The primary endpoint was the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The secondary endpoint was the maximum extent of reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, within 4 h of idarucizumab administration, based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).
Results: The final analysis included 804 patients. ADRs during the idarucizumab treatment and post-treatment periods were reported in 17 of 542 patients (3.1%) in group A and 12 of 240 patients (5.0%) in group B. Thrombotic events were reported in 22 patients (4.1%) in group A and 15 patients (6.3%) in group B, and hypersensitivity occurred in four (0.7%) and five patients (2.1%), respectively. Among 793 patients evaluated for effectiveness, 78 in group A and 26 in group B had aPTT data at baseline (immediately before idarucizumab administration) and within 4 h of idarucizumab administration; in these patients, median maximum percentage reversal within 4 h of idarucizumab administration was 100%.
Conclusions: The final analysis from the PMS study confirms previous findings suggesting that idarucizumab can safely and effectively reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in Japanese patients in clinical practice. The results support the continued use of idarucizumab in Japan.
Trial registration: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02946931).
{"title":"Idarucizumab for Emergency Reversal of the Anticoagulant Effects of Dabigatran: Final Results of a Japanese Postmarketing Surveillance Study.","authors":"Masahiro Yasaka, Hiroyuki Yokota, Michiyasu Suzuki, Hidesaku Asakura, Teiichi Yamane, Yukako Ogi, Takaaki Kimoto, Daisuke Nakayama","doi":"10.1007/s40119-023-00333-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40119-023-00333-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment that rapidly reverses the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, was approved in Japan in September 2016, at which time an all-case, postmarketing surveillance (PMS) study was initiated to collect data on idarucizumab in Japanese patients. Interim results were published previously, and the final results are reported herein.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, non-interventional PMS study was conducted in Japanese patients who received idarucizumab at the approved dose (2 × 2.5 g/50 ml) and had uncontrolled bleeding (group A) or required an emergency procedure (group B). The primary endpoint was the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The secondary endpoint was the maximum extent of reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, within 4 h of idarucizumab administration, based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 804 patients. ADRs during the idarucizumab treatment and post-treatment periods were reported in 17 of 542 patients (3.1%) in group A and 12 of 240 patients (5.0%) in group B. Thrombotic events were reported in 22 patients (4.1%) in group A and 15 patients (6.3%) in group B, and hypersensitivity occurred in four (0.7%) and five patients (2.1%), respectively. Among 793 patients evaluated for effectiveness, 78 in group A and 26 in group B had aPTT data at baseline (immediately before idarucizumab administration) and within 4 h of idarucizumab administration; in these patients, median maximum percentage reversal within 4 h of idarucizumab administration was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final analysis from the PMS study confirms previous findings suggesting that idarucizumab can safely and effectively reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in Japanese patients in clinical practice. The results support the continued use of idarucizumab in Japan.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02946931).</p>","PeriodicalId":9561,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"723-740"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704007/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41232577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}