Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada最新文献

Introduction: With routine catheterization and low urine output pre-transplant, renal transplant recipients (RTRs) may be at risk of urethral stricture disease post-transplant. The objective of this study was to characterize new urethral stricture disease in males following renal transplant.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was carried out on all male RTRs at Vancouver General Hospital who developed urethral strictures from October 2009-2019. Descriptive analyses were conducted on patient characteristics. Comparative analyses against non-stricture RTRs were carried out.

Results: Of 636 RTRs, 18 (2.8%) developed a postoperative urethral stricture. Median time from transplant to stricture discovery was 56 days (range 8-618 days). One-third of stricture patients had prior risk factors for stricture formation. Post-transplant, 77.8% presented symptomatically, with 61.1% requiring intervention. Overall graft survival rate was 88.9% among the RTR stricture group; 16.7% experienced acute rejection and 22.2% had delayed graft function (DGF). There was no significant association between developing postoperative urethral stricture and urinary tract infection (Chi-squared [X²]=0.04, p=0.84; odds ratio [OR ] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-6.21), DGF (X²=0.14, p=0.70; OR 0.8, CI 0.26-2.48), or acute rejection (X²=2.02, p=0.14; OR 2.55, CI 0.71-9.12).

Conclusions: De novo post-transplant urethral stricture rates appear to occur at a higher rate than the general population and contribute to patient morbidity. Stricture disease should be considered post-transplantation in patients with voiding dysfunction, even if they don't have prior risk factors. Multicenter studies should be considered to elucidate any relationship between urethral stricture and graft survival.

Introduction: Despite its minimally invasive nature, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL ) may be associated with significant pain. Challenges in pain control may prevent timely discharge (and expose patients to adverse effects of opioid use). We sought to evaluate whether our patients who underwent erector spinae plane (ESP) regional blocks experienced improved postoperative pain control and decreased opioid use after PCNL (compared with those who did not receive blocks).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PCNL cases on patients admitted for greater than 24 hours without pre-existing opioid regimens for chronic pain. Cases were completed by a single high-volume surgeon. Patients who accepted an ESP block were compared to those who did not receive a block. Patients received either a single injection or a disposable pump delivering intermittent boluses of ropivacaine 0.2%. Demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. The primary outcomes were opioid use measured in morphine milligram equivalent (MME ) and patient-reported pain scores during the first 24 hours of hospitalization.

Results: From March 2019 to August 2021, 44 patients were identified who met criteria - 28 of whom received an ESP block (including 14 continuous blocks). The patients who received blocks had significantly decreased opioid use (18.3 vs. 81.3 MME, p=0.004) and a longer mean time to first non-zero pain score (p=0.004). Continuous blocks had similar opioid use to single shot blocks (21.0 vs. 15.6 MME, p=0.952).

Conclusions: ESP regional blocks appear to offer an effective adjunct method for pain control after PCNL and may reduce post-PCNL opioid use while maintaining adequate patient analgesia.

Introduction: For mild to moderate male stress urinary incontinence (SUI), transobturator male slings remain an effective option for management. We aimed to use a machine learning (ML )-based model to predict those who will have a long-term success in managing SUI with male sling.

Methods: All transobturator male sling cases from August 2006 to June 2012 by a single surgeon were reviewed. Outcome of interest was defined as 'cure': complete dryness with 0 pads used, without the need for additional procedures. Clinical variables included in ML models were: number of pads used daily, age, height, weight, race, incontinence type, etiology of incontinence, history of radiation, smoking, bladder neck contracture, and prostatectomy. Model performance was assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and F1-score.

Results: A total of 181 patients were included in the model. The mean followup was 56.4 months (standard deviation [SD ] 41.6). Slightly more than half (53.6%, 97/181) of patients had procedural success. Logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor (KNN ), naive Bayes, decision tree, and random forest models were developed using ML. KNN model had the best performance, with AUROC of 0.759, AUPRC of 0.916, and F1-score of 0.833. Following ensemble learning with bagging and calibration, KNN model was further improved, with AUROC of 0.821, AUPRC of 0.921, and F-1 score of 0.848.

Conclusions: ML-based prediction of long-term transobturator male sling is feasible. The low numbers of patients used to develop the model prompt further validation and development of the model but may serve as a decision-making aid for practitioners in the future.

Introduction: The incidence and associations of postvoid dribbling (PVD) after urethroplasty remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of urethroplasty on PVD and factors associated with de novo PVD.

Methods: From 2011-2018, patients were offered enrollment in a prospective study assessing PVD after urethroplasty. PVD was assessed preoperatively and six months post-surgery with the question, "After urinating, do you have post-urination dribbling or leakage of urine?" Choices included, "Never" (1), "Occasionally" (2), "Sometimes" (3), "Most of the time" (4), or "All of the time" (5). A response of 3-5 was considered clinically significant. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pre- and postoperative PVD, while logistic regression was used to determine the association between new-onset PVD and clinical variables.

Results: A total of 384 patients completed the study, with 46.9% (180) reporting PVD preoperatively compared to 39.8% (153) postoperatively (p=0.01); 18.0% (67) of patients experienced de novo PVD, 57.0% (219) no change, and 25.0% (96) reported improvement. On multivariable logistic regression, patients undergoing anastomotic urethroplasty were less likely to report de novo PVD (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.83, p=0.02). No other factor was associated with de novo PVD, including age (p=0.59), stricture length (p=0.71), location (p=0.50), etiology (p=0.59), failed endoscopic treatment (p=0.18), previous urethroplasty (p=0.55), or recurrence (p=0.78). De novo PVD was not associated with patient dissatisfaction (10.1% vs. 7.6%, p=0.49).

Conclusions: PVD is common in patients with urethral stricture. While there is an overall improvement after urethroplasty, 18.0% of patients will experience de novo PVD, with a reduced incidence in those undergoing anastomotic urethroplasty.

Introduction: Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) accounts for approximately one-quarter of all surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) procedures performed in the U.S. Within five years of a patient's PUL procedure, approximately 1/7 patients will require surgical BPH retreatment. We aimed to highlight the evidence of surgical BPH retreatment modalities after PUL, with a focus on safety, short-term efficacy, durability, and relative costs.

Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed, and an exhaustive review of miscellaneous online resources was completed. The search was limited to English, human studies. Citations of relevant studies were reviewed.

Results: No study has examined the efficacy, safety, or durability of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or repeat PUL in the post-PUL setting. Recently, groups have examined laser enucleation (n=81), water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) (n=5), robotic simple prostatectomy (SP) (n=2), and prostatic artery embolization (PAE) (n=1) in the post-PUL setting. Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) after PUL appears to be safe and has similar functional outcomes to HoLEP controls. Other treatment modalities examined appear safe but have limited efficacy evidence supporting their use. Photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and robotic waterjet treatment (RWT) have no safety or efficacy studies to support their use in the post-PUL setting.

Conclusions: Despite increasing numbers of patients expected to require surgical retreatment after PUL in North America, there is currently limited evidence and a lack of recommendations guiding the evaluation and management of these patients. HoLEP is associated with the strongest evidence to support its use in the post-PUL setting.

Introduction: We sought to determine the satisfaction rates of examiners and candidates in a virtual Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) of graduating Canadian urology residents.

Methods: An annual mock exam, aimed at simulating the licencing urology exam for Canadian graduates, was moved to an online format for the 2020 cohort. This exam consists of an OSCE, and a written multiple-choice exam. The Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ), a previously validated tool for clinical encounters with three sub-domains (quality of care provided, similarity to face-to-face encounter, and perception of the interaction) was modified for the purposes of evaluating the OSCE encounter. The TSQ was sent electronically to all examiners and candidates after the exam.

Results: There were 14/16 responses from examiners (87.5%) and 24/39 responses from candidates (61.5%). Overall, the format was judged to be a good experience by 13/14 (92.9%) of examiners and 21/24 (87.5%) of candidates; however, when asked specifically if the virtual OSCE was an acceptable way to determine a candidate's competency to practice urology independently, only 8/14 (57.1%) of examiners and 15/24 (62.5%) of candidates agreed.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates an overall good satisfaction rate among both examiners and candidates when using a teleconference format for a mock OSCE.

Introduction: In line with Canadian provincial directives due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain elective urologic surgical cases that are normally performed as inpatient procedures were performed as same-day discharge procedures to reduce hospitalization and the usage of scarce healthcare resources. Since the pandemic, we began performing laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL ) as outpatient surgeries. This was supported by recent evidence demonstrating the safety and feasibility of performing these minimally invasive surgeries as same-day procedures. As such, we sought to retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety during the COVID-19 era at our institution for same-day discharge LEP, RARP, and PCNL procedures.

Methods: All patients operated for LEP, RARP, or PCNL between May 2020 and March 2022 at two academic institutions were included. Surgeries were classified as planned same-day discharge or inpatient surgery. Same-day discharge patients were compared to inpatients for each procedure type. This comparison assessed the occurrence of same-day failure, postoperative complications, and re-admission rates at 30 days. This study was approved by the scientific ethics committee of the Centre de Recherche de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM).

Results: A total of 413 subjects were included in this study. Among LEP patients (n=169), 104 (62%) were identified as same-day procedures and 65 (38%) were inpatient. Among RARP patients (n=194), 46 (24%) were identified as same-day procedures and 148 (76%) inpatient. Among PCNL patients (n=50), 38 (76%) were identified as same-day procedures and 12 (24%) were inpatient. Of the patients who underwent planned same-day LEP, RARP, and PCNL, 77.9%, 73.9%, and 71.1% were successfully discharged home, respectively. Patients who underwent LEP as inpatients had a higher incidence of overall postoperative complications compared to same-day LEP (23.1% vs. 8.7%, p=0.017). The rates of 30-day emergency department (ED ) visits and hospital re-admission were similar between inpatient and same-day LEP (9.2% vs. 3.8%, p=0.27; and 4.6% vs. 1.0%, p=0.32, respectively). Inpatient RARP, however, was associated with more 30-day ED visits compared to same-day procedures (17.4% vs. 4.1%, p<0.01). No statistically significant differences were found for postoperative complications (15.2% vs. 6.1%, p=0.097) and re-admission rates (1.4% vs. 4.3%, p=0.51). There were no significant differences on overall postoperative complications, 30-day ED visits, and re-admission rates in inpatient vs. same-day PCNL.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that same-day discharge for LEP, RARP, and PCNL is safe and feasible in select patients, with an acceptable complication rate. These results should be validated in a larger, prospective clinical trial comparing same-

Introduction: Urethral mesh perforation is a rare complication of mid-urethral sling resulting in a lack of clear management guidelines. Thus, we aimed to determine management options and their respective outcomes in terms of erosion resolution and continence.

Methods: A literature review was performed by extracting studies from the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from January 1996 to December 1, 2022. Only French and English language studies were included. A total of 227 papers were screened and assessed for eligibility.

Results: Forty-eight studies were included in the final analysis, for a total of 224 patients. Treatment options consisted of conservative, endoscopic, transurethral, and transvaginal approaches. Conservative treatment was associated with a 100% risk of persistence or recurrence of urethral perforation, while the failure rates for endoscopic, transurethral, and transvaginal approaches were 33%, 7.5%, and 7%, respectively. Most patients suffered from stress urinary incontinence after reconstructive management. The most common symptoms at the time of presentation were overactive bladder and pain. The mean time between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis was 10 months. About half of the urethral mesh perforations were diagnosed within the first years after the initial sling insertion.

Conclusions: Multiple management options for sling penetration of the urethra have been described in the literature. Transvaginal sling resection with consecutive tissue interposition seems to carry the lowest risk of erosion recurrence; however, all treatment options are associated with a high relapse rate for stress urinary incontinence.

Introduction: Studies published to date have suggested non-inferiority of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC), while few centers in Canada have adopted this approach. Though multifactorial, the learning curve and operative time are often discussed barriers. Herein, we present outcomes from the largest Canadian cohort of RARC performed to date.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing RARC by a single surgeon with greater than 1500 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) experience at our institution from May 2020 to December 2021. Clinicopathological, intraoperative, and postoperative data, as well as complications in the first 90 days, were collected. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between case volume and operative time/lymph node yield.

Results: A total of 31 patients underwent RARC during the study period, 26 of which were male. The median length of stay was six days (Q1-Q3 5-10), while days alive and out of hospital at 90 days were 83 days (Q1-Q3 80-85). Soft tissue margins were positive in 9.6% (3/31) of patients. Median lymph node yield was 17.0 lymph nodes (Q1-Q3 11-23). Median operative time was 241 minutes (Q1-Q3 228-252) in the ileal conduit group and 320 minutes (Q1-Q3 302-337) in the neobladder group. We observed four Clavien-Dindo grade >3 complications. The 90-day readmission rate and mortality rate were 17.2% (5) and 0% (0), respectively. There was no correlation between case volume and any outcome variables.

Conclusions: Previous high-volume experience performing RARP reduces the learning curve for performing RARC, with similar short-term outcomes to high-volume centers.