Nicholas Sellke, Kimberly Tay, Eric Zhou, Holly Harper, Amel Ahmed, Tsigab Hagos, Richard Hoehn, Shahrazad T Saab, Adam Calaway
{"title":"Case - Giant primary retroperitoneal teratoma with neuroendocrine components.","authors":"Nicholas Sellke, Kimberly Tay, Eric Zhou, Holly Harper, Amel Ahmed, Tsigab Hagos, Richard Hoehn, Shahrazad T Saab, Adam Calaway","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8401","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8401","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E405-E407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9951115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shamir Malik, Jeremy Wu, Nicole Bodnariuc, Krishnateja Narayana, Naveen Gupta, Mikail Malik, Jethro C C Kwong, Adree Khondker, Alistair E W Johnson, Girish S Kulkarni
Introduction: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in urology is gaining significant traction. While previous reviews of AI applications in urology exist, there have been few attempts to synthesize existing literature on urothelial cancer (UC).
Methods: Comprehensive searches based on the concepts of "AI" and "urothelial cancer" were conducted in MEDLINE , EMBASE , Web of Science, and Scopus. Study selection and data abstraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. Two independent raters assessed study quality in a random sample of 25 studies with the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) and the standardized reporting of machine learning applications in urology (STREAM-URO) framework.
Results: From a database search of 4581 studies, 227 were included. By area of research, 33% focused on image analysis, 26% on genomics, 16% on radiomics, and 15% on clinicopathology. Thematic content analysis identified qualitative trends in AI models employed and variables for feature extraction. Only 19% of studies compared performance of AI models to non-AI methods. All selected studies demonstrated high risk of bias for analysis and overall concern with Cohen's kappa (k)=0.68. Selected studies met 66% of STREAM-URO items, with k=0.76.
Conclusions: The use of AI in UC is a topic of increasing importance; however, there is a need for improved standardized reporting, as evidenced by the high risk of bias and low methodologic quality identified in the included studies.
导读:人工智能(AI)在泌尿外科的应用越来越受到重视。虽然之前有关于人工智能在泌尿外科应用的综述,但很少有人尝试综合现有的关于尿路上皮癌(UC)的文献。方法:基于“AI”和“尿路上皮癌”的概念在MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science、Scopus中进行综合检索。研究选择和数据提取由两名独立审稿人进行。两名独立评估员使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)和机器学习在泌尿科应用的标准化报告(STREAM-URO)框架对25项研究的随机样本进行了研究质量评估。结果:从数据库检索的4581项研究中,纳入227项。按研究领域划分,33%专注于图像分析,26%专注于基因组学,16%专注于放射组学,15%专注于临床病理学。主题内容分析确定了所采用的人工智能模型和特征提取变量的定性趋势。只有19%的研究将人工智能模型的性能与非人工智能方法进行了比较。所有入选的研究均显示分析偏倚风险高,总体关注Cohen’s kappa (k)=0.68。所选研究满足66%的STREAM-URO项目,k=0.76。结论:人工智能在UC中的应用是一个越来越重要的话题;然而,有必要改进标准化报告,正如纳入研究中发现的高偏倚风险和低方法学质量所证明的那样。
{"title":"Existing trends and applications of artificial intelligence in urothelial cancer A scoping review.","authors":"Shamir Malik, Jeremy Wu, Nicole Bodnariuc, Krishnateja Narayana, Naveen Gupta, Mikail Malik, Jethro C C Kwong, Adree Khondker, Alistair E W Johnson, Girish S Kulkarni","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8322","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8322","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in urology is gaining significant traction. While previous reviews of AI applications in urology exist, there have been few attempts to synthesize existing literature on urothelial cancer (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comprehensive searches based on the concepts of \"AI\" and \"urothelial cancer\" were conducted in MEDLINE , EMBASE , Web of Science, and Scopus. Study selection and data abstraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. Two independent raters assessed study quality in a random sample of 25 studies with the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) and the standardized reporting of machine learning applications in urology (STREAM-URO) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a database search of 4581 studies, 227 were included. By area of research, 33% focused on image analysis, 26% on genomics, 16% on radiomics, and 15% on clinicopathology. Thematic content analysis identified qualitative trends in AI models employed and variables for feature extraction. Only 19% of studies compared performance of AI models to non-AI methods. All selected studies demonstrated high risk of bias for analysis and overall concern with Cohen's kappa (k)=0.68. Selected studies met 66% of STREAM-URO items, with k=0.76.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of AI in UC is a topic of increasing importance; however, there is a need for improved standardized reporting, as evidenced by the high risk of bias and low methodologic quality identified in the included studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E395-E401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657228/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9944837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Long-term urodynamic (UDS) and urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an anti-incontinence (AI) procedure have been poorly characterized. We report our 10-year UDS findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction after AI procedure, who underwent urethrolysis.
Methods: We identified sequential records containing urethrolysis current procedural terminology codes over a 10-year period. Records of women with preoperative UDS were reviewed for demographics, UDS tracing, and outcomes following urethrolysis.
Results: Twenty-five women (mean age 60 years) had voiding phase dysfunction and underwent urethrolysis at a mean of 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-61) after AI procedure. Preoperatively, six (24%) women required intermittent catheterization. Free uroflowmetry revealed a mean maximum peak flow (Qmax) of 9.6 ml/s (IQR 7.0-11.0), voided volume of 137 ml (IQR 81-169), and postvoid residual of 167 ml (IQR 43-288). UDS revealed a mean UPP length of 24 mm (IQR 20-27), UPP closure pressure of 78 cmH2O (IQR 59-103), detrusor pressure at maximum flow (Pdet@Qmax) of 31 cmH2O (IQR 19-43), Qmax of 7.9 ml/s (IQR 5.0-12.0), bladder outlet obstruction index of 15 (IQR 0-34), and bladder contractility index of 71 (IQR 60-81). UPP length was significantly associated (Pearson correlation, p<0.05) with bladder outlet obstruction index (r=0.80), Pdet@Qmax (r=0.75), and time since AI procedure (r=-0.70). UPP closure pressure was significantly associated with age (r=-0.64), volume of first (r=-0.64) and strong (r=-0.78) desire, and capacity (r=-0.71). Following urethrolysis, spontaneous voiding was achieved in 23 (92%) women at followup (mean 308 days).
Conclusions: UPP may help characterize outlet parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an AI procedure, who ultimately undergo urethrolysis.
导读:长期尿动力学(UDS)和尿道压力测量(UPP)参数在抗尿失禁(AI)手术后出现排尿期功能障碍的女性的特征尚不明确。我们报告了10年的UDS在人工智能手术后排尿期功能障碍的妇女中发现的结果,这些妇女接受了解尿术。方法:我们在10年的时间里确定了包含尿道溶解现行程序术语代码的顺序记录。回顾术前UDS患者的人口统计、UDS追踪和解尿后的结果。结果:25名女性(平均年龄60岁)在人工智能手术后平均47个月(四分位数间距[IQR] 12-61)出现排尿期功能障碍并进行了尿道溶解。术前,6名(24%)女性需要间歇性置管。自由尿流仪显示,平均最大峰流量(Qmax)为9.6 ml/s (IQR 7.0-11.0),空腔体积为137 ml (IQR 81-169),空腔后残留为167 ml (IQR 43-288)。UDS显示UPP平均长度为24 mm (IQR 20-27), UPP闭合压力为78 cmH2O (IQR 59-103),最大流量逼尿肌压力(Pdet@Qmax)为31 cmH2O (IQR 19-43), Qmax为7.9 ml/s (IQR 5.0-12.0),膀胱出口阻塞指数为15 (IQR 0-34),膀胱收缩指数为71 (IQR 60-81)。UPP长度显著相关(Pearson相关性,p)结论:UPP可能有助于确定AI手术后排尿期功能障碍的女性的出口参数,这些女性最终接受了解尿术。
{"title":"Urodynamic and urethral pressure profilometry findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction treated with surgical urethrolysis.","authors":"Amy D Dobberfuhl, Craig V Comiter, Sayantan Deb","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8342","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-term urodynamic (UDS) and urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an anti-incontinence (AI) procedure have been poorly characterized. We report our 10-year UDS findings in women with voiding phase dysfunction after AI procedure, who underwent urethrolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified sequential records containing urethrolysis current procedural terminology codes over a 10-year period. Records of women with preoperative UDS were reviewed for demographics, UDS tracing, and outcomes following urethrolysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five women (mean age 60 years) had voiding phase dysfunction and underwent urethrolysis at a mean of 47 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12-61) after AI procedure. Preoperatively, six (24%) women required intermittent catheterization. Free uroflowmetry revealed a mean maximum peak flow (Qmax) of 9.6 ml/s (IQR 7.0-11.0), voided volume of 137 ml (IQR 81-169), and postvoid residual of 167 ml (IQR 43-288). UDS revealed a mean UPP length of 24 mm (IQR 20-27), UPP closure pressure of 78 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (IQR 59-103), detrusor pressure at maximum flow (Pdet@Qmax) of 31 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (IQR 19-43), Qmax of 7.9 ml/s (IQR 5.0-12.0), bladder outlet obstruction index of 15 (IQR 0-34), and bladder contractility index of 71 (IQR 60-81). UPP length was significantly associated (Pearson correlation, p<0.05) with bladder outlet obstruction index (r=0.80), Pdet@Qmax (r=0.75), and time since AI procedure (r=-0.70). UPP closure pressure was significantly associated with age (r=-0.64), volume of first (r=-0.64) and strong (r=-0.78) desire, and capacity (r=-0.71). Following urethrolysis, spontaneous voiding was achieved in 23 (92%) women at followup (mean 308 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UPP may help characterize outlet parameters in women with voiding phase dysfunction following an AI procedure, who ultimately undergo urethrolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E374-E380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657230/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9951114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taylor Goodstein, Patrick Mershon, Tasha Posid, Aliza Khuhro, Mary Charleton, Amara Ndumele, Colin Kleinguetl, Chase Arnold, Bodo Knudsen, Michael Sourial
Introduction: Options for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vary and depend primarily on surgeon preference and case considerations. In our practice, patients traditionally returned one week postoperatively to remove the stents in the office via cystoscopy; however, following uncomplicated PCNL with no plans for second-look procedure, a ureteral stent on a tether is currently removed in tandem with the Foley catheter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) prior to patient discharge. This study compared the number of postoperative events between POD1 stent removal and their longer stented counterparts.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients who had undergone PCNL at our institution from January 1, 2020, to June 31, 2021. Patient demographics, operative metrics, and postoperative events (telephone calls, emergency department [ED ]/clinic visits, and complications) were recorded and compared between the two groups.
Results: A total of 243 patients were included in final analysis: 46% (n=111) had their stent removed on POD1 and 54% (n=132) had longer indwelling stent times. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Number of telephone calls (p=0.081), ED /clinic visits (p=0.093), and complications (p=0.647) were similar between groups. There were three (1.3%) unplanned second-look procedures: two (1.8%) in the POD1 stent removal group and one (0.8%, p=0.475) in the later stent removal group.
Conclusions: In this limited, retrospective study, we did not detect a difference in postoperative events or short-term complications for POD1 vs. later stent removal after uncomplicated PCNL.
{"title":"Postoperative events and complications of next-day stent removal following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to longer stenting.","authors":"Taylor Goodstein, Patrick Mershon, Tasha Posid, Aliza Khuhro, Mary Charleton, Amara Ndumele, Colin Kleinguetl, Chase Arnold, Bodo Knudsen, Michael Sourial","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8364","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8364","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Options for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vary and depend primarily on surgeon preference and case considerations. In our practice, patients traditionally returned one week postoperatively to remove the stents in the office via cystoscopy; however, following uncomplicated PCNL with no plans for second-look procedure, a ureteral stent on a tether is currently removed in tandem with the Foley catheter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) prior to patient discharge. This study compared the number of postoperative events between POD1 stent removal and their longer stented counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients who had undergone PCNL at our institution from January 1, 2020, to June 31, 2021. Patient demographics, operative metrics, and postoperative events (telephone calls, emergency department [ED ]/clinic visits, and complications) were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 243 patients were included in final analysis: 46% (n=111) had their stent removed on POD1 and 54% (n=132) had longer indwelling stent times. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Number of telephone calls (p=0.081), ED /clinic visits (p=0.093), and complications (p=0.647) were similar between groups. There were three (1.3%) unplanned second-look procedures: two (1.8%) in the POD1 stent removal group and one (0.8%, p=0.475) in the later stent removal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this limited, retrospective study, we did not detect a difference in postoperative events or short-term complications for POD1 vs. later stent removal after uncomplicated PCNL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E381-E387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657223/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9944833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tomas Paneque, John Richey, Ahmad Abdelrazek, Kevin Morgan, Joseph Fitz-Gerald, Seth Swinney, Zachary M Connelly, Nazih Khater
Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) causes pain and discomfort after surgery. The primary causes of immediate postoperative pain after PCNL are visceral pain from the ureters and kidneys, and body surface discomfort from incisions. Acute, untreated pain has the potential to develop into chronic pain, which remains a considerable burden for the rehabilitation of patients. The goal of this review was to describe the current options for treating pain post-PCNL.
Methods: We conducted a literature review of all published manuscripts on pain protocols for patients undergoing PCNL and related topics; 50 published manuscripts were identified and reviewed.
Results: PCNL morbidity must be reduced by an appropriate management of postoperative pain. Opioids, multimodal therapy, tubeless PCNL, reduced size of nephrostomy tube, and regional anesthesia are currently available for reducing postoperative pain.
Conclusions: Implementing successful treatment strategies for postoperative pain after PCNL is key in reducing the morbidity and mortality of PCNL.
{"title":"Current advances in pain regimens for percutaneous nephrolithotomy A comprehensive review.","authors":"Tomas Paneque, John Richey, Ahmad Abdelrazek, Kevin Morgan, Joseph Fitz-Gerald, Seth Swinney, Zachary M Connelly, Nazih Khater","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8333","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8333","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) causes pain and discomfort after surgery. The primary causes of immediate postoperative pain after PCNL are visceral pain from the ureters and kidneys, and body surface discomfort from incisions. Acute, untreated pain has the potential to develop into chronic pain, which remains a considerable burden for the rehabilitation of patients. The goal of this review was to describe the current options for treating pain post-PCNL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature review of all published manuscripts on pain protocols for patients undergoing PCNL and related topics; 50 published manuscripts were identified and reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCNL morbidity must be reduced by an appropriate management of postoperative pain. Opioids, multimodal therapy, tubeless PCNL, reduced size of nephrostomy tube, and regional anesthesia are currently available for reducing postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing successful treatment strategies for postoperative pain after PCNL is key in reducing the morbidity and mortality of PCNL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E388-E394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657229/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9951113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taylor Remondini, Alexandra Millman, Keith Jarvi, Ethan Grober, Yonah Krakowsky
Introduction: The aim of this study was to establish the quality of patient-facing websites advertising low-intensity shockwave therapy (LISWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD) patients in Canada.
Methods: Canadian websites offering LIWST for ED or PD were identified using online web searches. The characteristics of these websites were reviewed, along with examining the presence of HONCode certification, assigning a brief DISCERN score (a tool designed to evaluate health information online) and readability scores. We also examined the LIWST technology advertised, as well as benefits of LIWST cited by the websites.
Results: Twenty-five unique websites linked to 46 clinics were identified and reviewed. Twenty-four percent of websites were run by a urologist. Other specialties offering LISWT included general practitioners, anesthesiologists, naturopaths, nurse practitioners, physiotherapists, and registered massage therapists. Twenty-four percent of the websites advertised the use of a focused shockwave generator. Forty percent of the websites had peer-reviewed references. The average brief DISCERN score was 14 (standard deviation 3.4). There was no association between the physician-or non-physician-led websites and the use of peer-reviewed references, readability scores, the number of clinic locations, or higher brief discern scores.
Conclusions: LISWT is readily advertised online for ED and PD patients in Canada; however, only a minority use a focused shockwave generator. There is a wide diversity of practitioners offering LISWT. Websites offering LISWT are generally of poor quality and do not provide adequate information for patients to make educated treatment decisions.
{"title":"Survey of the quality and origins of websites on penile low-intensity shockwave therapy in Canada.","authors":"Taylor Remondini, Alexandra Millman, Keith Jarvi, Ethan Grober, Yonah Krakowsky","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8303","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8303","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to establish the quality of patient-facing websites advertising low-intensity shockwave therapy (LISWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD) patients in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Canadian websites offering LIWST for ED or PD were identified using online web searches. The characteristics of these websites were reviewed, along with examining the presence of HONCode certification, assigning a brief DISCERN score (a tool designed to evaluate health information online) and readability scores. We also examined the LIWST technology advertised, as well as benefits of LIWST cited by the websites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five unique websites linked to 46 clinics were identified and reviewed. Twenty-four percent of websites were run by a urologist. Other specialties offering LISWT included general practitioners, anesthesiologists, naturopaths, nurse practitioners, physiotherapists, and registered massage therapists. Twenty-four percent of the websites advertised the use of a focused shockwave generator. Forty percent of the websites had peer-reviewed references. The average brief DISCERN score was 14 (standard deviation 3.4). There was no association between the physician-or non-physician-led websites and the use of peer-reviewed references, readability scores, the number of clinic locations, or higher brief discern scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LISWT is readily advertised online for ED and PD patients in Canada; however, only a minority use a focused shockwave generator. There is a wide diversity of practitioners offering LISWT. Websites offering LISWT are generally of poor quality and do not provide adequate information for patients to make educated treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E358-E363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657231/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9944834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohamed Elsaqa, Katherine Dowd, Amr El Mekresh, Karen M Doersch, Marawan M El Tayeb
Introduction: Storage urinary symptoms and urinary tract infection (UTI) are among the most common complications following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). We aimed to study the incidence and risk factors for storage urinary symptoms and early UTI following HoLEP.
Methods: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients who underwent HoLEP over a five-year period at a single tertiary center. Patient demographics, preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics, as well as infection rates, were obtained and analyzed using the appropriate statistical methods.
Results: Of a total 514 patients who underwent HoLEP, 473 patients with complete followup data were included. Mean (± standard deviation) age and median (interquartile range) prostate volume were 72±9.1 years and 89 (68-126) g, respectively. Preoperative positive urine culture and urine retention were seen in 28.5% (n=135) and 23.46 % (n=111) of patients, respectively. At six-week followup, irritative urinary symptoms were seen in 32.3% (n=153) of patients, while 13.5% (n= 64) of patients had positive urine culture. Bivariate and multivariate analysis showed that factors associated with significant higher rate of postoperative UTI at six weeks were high body mass index (BMI) (p= 0.023), weak grip strength within preoperative frailty assessment (p=0.042), positive preoperative urine culture (p=0.025), and postoperative incontinence (p=0.002).
Conclusions: Storage urinary symptoms are common complaints post-HoLEP; however, it may be caused by an inflammatory rather than infective process in a significant percentage of patients. Possible predictors of UTI after HoLEP are high BMI, preoperative positive urine culture, higher frailty scale, and postoperative urinary incontinence.
{"title":"Predictors of postoperative urinary tract infection following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.","authors":"Mohamed Elsaqa, Katherine Dowd, Amr El Mekresh, Karen M Doersch, Marawan M El Tayeb","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8269","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Storage urinary symptoms and urinary tract infection (UTI) are among the most common complications following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). We aimed to study the incidence and risk factors for storage urinary symptoms and early UTI following HoLEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients who underwent HoLEP over a five-year period at a single tertiary center. Patient demographics, preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics, as well as infection rates, were obtained and analyzed using the appropriate statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total 514 patients who underwent HoLEP, 473 patients with complete followup data were included. Mean (± standard deviation) age and median (interquartile range) prostate volume were 72±9.1 years and 89 (68-126) g, respectively. Preoperative positive urine culture and urine retention were seen in 28.5% (n=135) and 23.46 % (n=111) of patients, respectively. At six-week followup, irritative urinary symptoms were seen in 32.3% (n=153) of patients, while 13.5% (n= 64) of patients had positive urine culture. Bivariate and multivariate analysis showed that factors associated with significant higher rate of postoperative UTI at six weeks were high body mass index (BMI) (p= 0.023), weak grip strength within preoperative frailty assessment (p=0.042), positive preoperative urine culture (p=0.025), and postoperative incontinence (p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Storage urinary symptoms are common complaints post-HoLEP; however, it may be caused by an inflammatory rather than infective process in a significant percentage of patients. Possible predictors of UTI after HoLEP are high BMI, preoperative positive urine culture, higher frailty scale, and postoperative urinary incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E364-E368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657227/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10121126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek, Ender Ozden, Murat Gulsen, Onur Kalayci, Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu, Yakup Bostanci, Saban Sarikaya
Introduction: This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN).
Methods: Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and BINSEG method. The cohort was divided into three groups - group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11-48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test.
Results: Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable.
Conclusions: In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.
{"title":"The learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysis.","authors":"Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek, Ender Ozden, Murat Gulsen, Onur Kalayci, Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu, Yakup Bostanci, Saban Sarikaya","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8372","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and BINSEG method. The cohort was divided into three groups - group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11-48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E369-E373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657224/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9944836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
James Misurka, Katherine Lajkosz, Miran Kenk, Antonio Finelli, Neil E Fleshner
Introduction: Physician assistants (PAs) are healthcare professionals who act as physician extenders. PAs are being used more and more in a wide variety of clinic settings throughout Canada to increase access to healthcare and reduce cost. We set out to determine the impact of PAs on a tertiary care center urologic oncology practice.
Methods: We reviewed Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) billing codes since the introduction of PAs for two attending urologists at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Data were grouped into early experience and established experience. In addition, questionnaires were electronically distributed among nurses, physicians, residents, and fellows who work with PAs in clinic. Patient visits conducted by PAs were tracked for one quarter to estimate the amount of annual patients seen by PAs. The costs associated with PAs are presented as recommendations for a new graduate PA hire.
Results: On average, PAs increased clinic volume by 11.3 patient visits per day. Furthermore, they individually care for an average of 24 patients per day. PAs did not represent a financial burden on the urology practice plan (revenue gain of $16 800). Our questionnaire demonstrated that PAs were capable healthcare professionals, who decreased workload and contributed to resident/fellow education.
Conclusions: PAs in a Canadian urology practice allow for more patient visits, decrease in physician workload, and positively impact trainee education. PAs saw more patients in clinic than clinic growth, thereby decreasing physician, fellow, and resident workload. The offset of the increase in patient visits made the PAs a cost-neutral investment.
{"title":"Quantitative and qualitative impact of physician assistants in a Canadian urology setting.","authors":"James Misurka, Katherine Lajkosz, Miran Kenk, Antonio Finelli, Neil E Fleshner","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8287","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physician assistants (PAs) are healthcare professionals who act as physician extenders. PAs are being used more and more in a wide variety of clinic settings throughout Canada to increase access to healthcare and reduce cost. We set out to determine the impact of PAs on a tertiary care center urologic oncology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) billing codes since the introduction of PAs for two attending urologists at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Data were grouped into early experience and established experience. In addition, questionnaires were electronically distributed among nurses, physicians, residents, and fellows who work with PAs in clinic. Patient visits conducted by PAs were tracked for one quarter to estimate the amount of annual patients seen by PAs. The costs associated with PAs are presented as recommendations for a new graduate PA hire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, PAs increased clinic volume by 11.3 patient visits per day. Furthermore, they individually care for an average of 24 patients per day. PAs did not represent a financial burden on the urology practice plan (revenue gain of $16 800). Our questionnaire demonstrated that PAs were capable healthcare professionals, who decreased workload and contributed to resident/fellow education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PAs in a Canadian urology practice allow for more patient visits, decrease in physician workload, and positively impact trainee education. PAs saw more patients in clinic than clinic growth, thereby decreasing physician, fellow, and resident workload. The offset of the increase in patient visits made the PAs a cost-neutral investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"337-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581721/pdf/cuaj-10-337.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9873264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Steven M Yip, Christopher Morash, Michael P Kolinsky, Anil Kapoor, Michael Ong, Shamini Selvarajah, Jennifer Nuk, Katie Compton, Frederic Pouliot, Luke T Lavallée, Daniel J Khalaf, Robert J Hamilton, Geoffrey T Gotto, Ricardo A Rendon, Elie Antebi, Sebastien J Hotte, Shawn Malone, Kim N Chi, Darrel E Drachenberg, Fred Saad, Jonathan Chan, Cristiano Ferrario, Jenny Ko, Bobby Shayegan, Sunil Parimi, Alan I So, Andrew Feifer, Kenneth Jansz, Daygen Finch, Joseph L Chin, Brendan Osborne, Kai Fai Ho, Corine Demanga Galamo, Anousheh Zardan, Tamim Niazi
Introduction: In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), the identification of an alteration in genes associated with homologous recombination repair (HRR) has implications for prognostication, optimization of therapy, and familial risk mitigation. The aim of this study was to assess the genomic testing landscape of PCa in Canada and to recommend an approach to offering germline and tumor testing for HRR-associated genes.
Methods: The Canadian Genitourinary Research Consortium (GURC) administered a cross-sectional survey to a largely academic, multidisciplinary group of investigators across 22 GURC sites between January and June 2022.
Results: Thirty-eight investigators from all 22 sites responded to the survey. Germline genetic testing was initiated by 34%, while 45% required a referral to a genetic specialist. Most investigators (82%) reported that both germline and tumor testing were needed, with 92% currently offering germline and 72% offering tissue testing to patients with advanced PCa. The most cited reasons for not offering testing were an access gap (50%), uncertainties around who to test and which genes to test, (33%) and interpreting results (17%). A majority reported that patients with advanced PCa (74-80%) should be tested, with few investigators testing patients with localized disease except when there is a family history of PCa (45-55%).
Conclusions: Canadian physicians with academic subspecialist backgrounds in genitourinary malignancies recognize the benefits of both germline and somatic testing in PCa; however, there are challenges in accessing testing across practices and specialties. An algorithm to reduce uncertainty for providers when ordering genetic testing for patients with PCa is proposed.
{"title":"Genetic testing practices among specialist physicians who treat prostate cancer A Canadian, cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Steven M Yip, Christopher Morash, Michael P Kolinsky, Anil Kapoor, Michael Ong, Shamini Selvarajah, Jennifer Nuk, Katie Compton, Frederic Pouliot, Luke T Lavallée, Daniel J Khalaf, Robert J Hamilton, Geoffrey T Gotto, Ricardo A Rendon, Elie Antebi, Sebastien J Hotte, Shawn Malone, Kim N Chi, Darrel E Drachenberg, Fred Saad, Jonathan Chan, Cristiano Ferrario, Jenny Ko, Bobby Shayegan, Sunil Parimi, Alan I So, Andrew Feifer, Kenneth Jansz, Daygen Finch, Joseph L Chin, Brendan Osborne, Kai Fai Ho, Corine Demanga Galamo, Anousheh Zardan, Tamim Niazi","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8403","DOIUrl":"10.5489/cuaj.8403","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), the identification of an alteration in genes associated with homologous recombination repair (HRR) has implications for prognostication, optimization of therapy, and familial risk mitigation. The aim of this study was to assess the genomic testing landscape of PCa in Canada and to recommend an approach to offering germline and tumor testing for HRR-associated genes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Canadian Genitourinary Research Consortium (GURC) administered a cross-sectional survey to a largely academic, multidisciplinary group of investigators across 22 GURC sites between January and June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight investigators from all 22 sites responded to the survey. Germline genetic testing was initiated by 34%, while 45% required a referral to a genetic specialist. Most investigators (82%) reported that both germline and tumor testing were needed, with 92% currently offering germline and 72% offering tissue testing to patients with advanced PCa. The most cited reasons for not offering testing were an access gap (50%), uncertainties around who to test and which genes to test, (33%) and interpreting results (17%). A majority reported that patients with advanced PCa (74-80%) should be tested, with few investigators testing patients with localized disease except when there is a family history of PCa (45-55%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Canadian physicians with academic subspecialist backgrounds in genitourinary malignancies recognize the benefits of both germline and somatic testing in PCa; however, there are challenges in accessing testing across practices and specialties. An algorithm to reduce uncertainty for providers when ordering genetic testing for patients with PCa is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"326-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581730/pdf/cuaj-10-326.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9873266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}