Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90001-I
Anke Ehlers
Somatic sensations are not only a core symptom of panic attacks, but they are also considered the primary trigger of the attacks according to recent psychological models. Studying interoception in panic disorder may help to specify situational factors of panic attacks and to explain why some people are more prone to panic attacks than others. Our research program identified three characteristics of panic disorder patients which may contribute to why they notice more bodily symptoms, tend to respond with anxiety when they experience such symptoms and tend to avoid situations in which such symptoms occur. Panic patients demonstrated an enhanced ability to perceive their heart rate, they tended to shift their attention towards physically threatening cues and they rated bodily symptoms associated with anxiety or panic as more dangerous. These factors may be involved in the development and maintenance of panic disorder.
{"title":"Interoception and panic disorder","authors":"Anke Ehlers","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90001-I","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90001-I","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Somatic sensations are not only a core symptom of panic attacks, but they are also considered the primary trigger of the attacks according to recent psychological models. Studying interoception in panic disorder may help to specify situational factors of panic attacks and to explain why some people are more prone to panic attacks than others. Our research program identified three characteristics of panic disorder patients which may contribute to why they notice more bodily symptoms, tend to respond with anxiety when they experience such symptoms and tend to avoid situations in which such symptoms occur. Panic patients demonstrated an enhanced ability to perceive their heart rate, they tended to shift their attention towards physically threatening cues and they rated bodily symptoms associated with anxiety or panic as more dangerous. These factors may be involved in the development and maintenance of panic disorder.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 3-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90001-I","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91524409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90012-Q
Arnoud Arntz , Edith Lavy , Germie van den Berg , Stella van Rijsoort
Beliefs held by spider phobics about a confrontation with a spider are investigated. Study 1 explores the content of thoughts and images which spider phobics (N = 44) report to have during a confrontation with a spider and investigates the frequency and strength of the subjective belief in the idea. Spider phobics appear to have an abundance of negative, irrational ideas about the spider and about their own reactions during a confrontation with a spider. A one-session therapistassisted exposure therapy strongly attenuates these beliefs. Study 2 investigates the psychometric properties of the Spider Phobia Beliefs Questionnaire (SBQ), which measures the strength of belief of a large number of ideas derived from Study 1, in a second sample of spider phobics (N = 112). Factor analysis revealed 5 spider-related factors: harm, hunter and prey, unpredictability, territory, and multiplication; and 4 self-related factors: panic, paralysis, incubation, and unrestrained behavior. These factors have good internal consistency and reasonable test-retest reliability. The SBQ discriminates strongly between spider phobics and normals (N = 33) and has good concurrent validity as indicated by positive associations with other indices of spider phobia. It appears that spider phobics have a lot of misconceptions about spiders, e.g., that spiders attack them, take revenge, or are incalculable and about their own reactions about a confrontation with a spider, e.g., they expect to have a heart attack, to die of fear, or to exacerbate their fear. Most self-related ideas resemble those held by panic patients. Both spider-related and self-related ideas can be corrected by a one-session treatment.
{"title":"Negative beliefs of spider phobics: A psychometric evaluation of the spider phobia beliefs questionnaire","authors":"Arnoud Arntz , Edith Lavy , Germie van den Berg , Stella van Rijsoort","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90012-Q","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90012-Q","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Beliefs held by spider phobics about a confrontation with a spider are investigated. Study 1 explores the content of thoughts and images which spider phobics (<em>N</em> = 44) report to have during a confrontation with a spider and investigates the frequency and strength of the subjective belief in the idea. Spider phobics appear to have an abundance of negative, irrational ideas about the spider and about their own reactions during a confrontation with a spider. A one-session therapistassisted exposure therapy strongly attenuates these beliefs. Study 2 investigates the psychometric properties of the Spider Phobia Beliefs Questionnaire (SBQ), which measures the strength of belief of a large number of ideas derived from Study 1, in a second sample of spider phobics (<em>N</em> = 112). Factor analysis revealed 5 spider-related factors: <em>harm, hunter and prey, unpredictability, territory</em>, and <em>multiplication</em>; and 4 self-related factors: <em>panic, paralysis, incubation</em>, and <em>unrestrained behavior</em>. These factors have good internal consistency and reasonable test-retest reliability. The SBQ discriminates strongly between spider phobics and normals (<em>N</em> = 33) and has good concurrent validity as indicated by positive associations with other indices of spider phobia. It appears that spider phobics have a lot of misconceptions about spiders, e.g., that spiders attack them, take revenge, or are incalculable and about their own reactions about a confrontation with a spider, e.g., they expect to have a heart attack, to die of fear, or to exacerbate their fear. Most self-related ideas resemble those held by panic patients. Both spider-related and self-related ideas can be corrected by a one-session treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 257-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90012-Q","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86465833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90018-W
Willem A Arrindell , Annemarie M Kolk , Mary J Pickersgill , Willem J.J.M Hageman
Given meta-analytic findings showing females to be generally more fearful than males on multi-dimensional self-report measures of fear, an empirical attempt was made to examine whether this outcome could be explained by psychological factors such as sex role orientation and masculine sex role stress. In addition, the bearing of dissimulation tendencies on findings relating self-reported fears to biological sex, sex roles, and masculine sex role stress was also addressed. Using a non-clinical sample of volunteers from Britain, it was observed with simple correlational analyses that females were more fearful than males on Social, Agoraphobic, Harmless animals and Sexual and aggressive scenes fears, even after holding constant the combined influences of Masculinity and Masculine sex role stress. The sex difference in Bodily injury, death and illness fears emerged only after adjusting for the joint influences of Masculinity and Masculine sex role stress. Applying hierarchical multiple regression analysis with interaction terms, it was found that (a) Biological sex contributed significantly in increasing the proportion of variance accounted for in scores on Social, Agoraphobic, Harmless animals and Sexual and aggressive scenes fears, after accounting for the joint influences of Masculinity (M), Femininity (F), Masculine sex role stress (MGRS), Dissimulation (Lie) and other potentially confounding factors; (b) following the simultaneous adjustment for the influences of the same set of potentially confounding factors (thus including M, F, MGRS, and Lie scores), Biological sex emerged as a consistent predictor of all five types of fears considered, with, as hypothesized, being female predicting high fear scores; (c) the same applied to the predictive ability of Masculine sex role stress (with Biological sex now included as a covariate), with, as predicted, higher stress being predictive of higher fear levels; (d) again, taking into account potentially confounding factors, Masculinity predicted all types of fears considered, except Fears of sexual and aggressive scenes, with, as anticipated, high Masculinity predicting low levels of fear, whereas, contrary to expectations, Femininity and Dissimulation did not succeed in predicting fear scores of any type; (e) few combinations of independent variables (involving Biological sex, M, F, MGRS and Lie) predicted fear scores significantly following adjustment for potential confounds, the significant predictors being MGRS × Biological sex (in relation to Social fears), Lie × Biological sex (Fears of bodily injury, death and illness) and M × F (Harmless animals fears) with respective βs of −.14, .17 and .22 (.01 ⩽ P ⩽ .05); (f) while Biological sex, Masculinity and Masculine sex role stress were all factors predicting the magnitude of self-reported fears, their relative contributions varied according to the fear dimension. Five major hypotheses about the relationship between sex roles and mental a
{"title":"Biological sex, sex role orientation, masculine sex role stress, dissimulation and self-reported fears","authors":"Willem A Arrindell , Annemarie M Kolk , Mary J Pickersgill , Willem J.J.M Hageman","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90018-W","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90018-W","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given meta-analytic findings showing females to be generally more fearful than males on multi-dimensional self-report measures of fear, an empirical attempt was made to examine whether this outcome could be explained by psychological factors such as sex role orientation and masculine sex role stress. In addition, the bearing of dissimulation tendencies on findings relating self-reported fears to biological sex, sex roles, and masculine sex role stress was also addressed. Using a non-clinical sample of volunteers from Britain, it was observed with simple correlational analyses that females were more fearful than males on Social, Agoraphobic, Harmless animals and Sexual and aggressive scenes fears, even after holding constant the combined influences of Masculinity and Masculine sex role stress. The sex difference in Bodily injury, death and illness fears emerged only after adjusting for the joint influences of Masculinity and Masculine sex role stress. Applying hierarchical multiple regression analysis with interaction terms, it was found that (a) Biological sex contributed significantly in increasing the proportion of variance accounted for in scores on Social, Agoraphobic, Harmless animals and Sexual and aggressive scenes fears, after accounting for the joint influences of Masculinity (M), Femininity (F), Masculine sex role stress (MGRS), Dissimulation (Lie) and other potentially confounding factors; (b) following the simultaneous adjustment for the influences of the same set of potentially confounding factors (thus including M, F, MGRS, and Lie scores), Biological sex emerged as a consistent predictor of all five types of fears considered, with, as hypothesized, being female predicting high fear scores; (c) the same applied to the predictive ability of Masculine sex role stress (with Biological sex now included as a covariate), with, as predicted, higher stress being predictive of higher fear levels; (d) again, taking into account potentially confounding factors, Masculinity predicted all types of fears considered, except Fears of sexual and aggressive scenes, with, as anticipated, high Masculinity predicting low levels of fear, whereas, contrary to expectations, Femininity and Dissimulation did not succeed in predicting fear scores of any type; (e) few combinations of independent variables (involving Biological sex, M, F, MGRS and Lie) predicted fear scores significantly following adjustment for potential confounds, the significant predictors being MGRS × Biological sex (in relation to Social fears), Lie × Biological sex (Fears of bodily injury, death and illness) and M × F (Harmless animals fears) with respective <em>β</em>s of −.14, .17 and .22 (.01 ⩽ P ⩽ .05); (f) while Biological sex, Masculinity and Masculine sex role stress were all factors predicting the magnitude of self-reported fears, their relative contributions varied according to the fear dimension. Five major hypotheses about the relationship between sex roles and mental a","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 103-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90018-W","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85033906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90003-K
Jürgen Margraf
Hyperventilation is probably the most frequently discussed correlate of panic attacks. Although some authors see it as the main or even unique cause of panic attacks, there have been numerous reviews with contradictory conclusions. Recent research, however, provides some more clarity. After a short overview of the characteristics of hyperventilation, the present article discusses (1) indirect measures of the overlap between panic and hyperventilation, (2) direct measures of hyperventilation at rest and during naturally occurring panic, (3) the influence of cognitive variables, and (4) the major theories attempting to explain the relationship between hyperventilation and panic. The results indicate a substantial overlap between panic and hyperventilation, but by far no one-to-one relationship and no chronic hyperventilation in panic patients if anticipatory anxiety is ruled out. In addition, cognitive studies firmly support the relevance of perceptive and associative processes. Theories that consider hyperventilation as a necessary or sufficient condition for panic attacks are clearly discarded by the imperfect relationship between the two phenomena. The central chemoreceptor sensitivity theory of panic is consistent with the physiologic effects of both hyperventilation and CO2 inhalation but has to face inconsistent results on ventilatory characteristics of panic patients. Furthermore, it can neither explain the weak responses to hyperventilation or CO2 in some panic patients nor the influence of cognitive variables. Only a psychophysiological theory that takes cognitive, conditioning and physiologic factors into account is consistent with the total body of research accumulated to date. According to this approach, hyperventilation is related to panic in two ways: First, it is one of many processes that can lead to the perception of bodily sensations which may trigger positive feedback loops between sensations and anxiety responses. Second, because of the circular nature of such feedback processes, hyperventilation can also be a response to anxiety. In conclusion, hyperventilation is not uniquely relevant for panic, but the degree of overlap between the two phenomena gives it a prominent role as a trigger for panic and a vehicle for successful psychological treatment.
{"title":"Hyperventilation and panic disorder: a psychophysiological connection","authors":"Jürgen Margraf","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90003-K","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90003-K","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hyperventilation is probably the most frequently discussed correlate of panic attacks. Although some authors see it as the main or even unique cause of panic attacks, there have been numerous reviews with contradictory conclusions. Recent research, however, provides some more clarity. After a short overview of the characteristics of hyperventilation, the present article discusses (1) indirect measures of the overlap between panic and hyperventilation, (2) direct measures of hyperventilation at rest and during naturally occurring panic, (3) the influence of cognitive variables, and (4) the major theories attempting to explain the relationship between hyperventilation and panic. The results indicate a substantial overlap between panic and hyperventilation, but by far no one-to-one relationship and no chronic hyperventilation in panic patients if anticipatory anxiety is ruled out. In addition, cognitive studies firmly support the relevance of perceptive and associative processes. Theories that consider hyperventilation as a necessary or sufficient condition for panic attacks are clearly discarded by the imperfect relationship between the two phenomena. The central chemoreceptor sensitivity theory of panic is consistent with the physiologic effects of both hyperventilation and CO<sub>2</sub> inhalation but has to face inconsistent results on ventilatory characteristics of panic patients. Furthermore, it can neither explain the weak responses to hyperventilation or CO<sub>2</sub> in some panic patients nor the influence of cognitive variables. Only a psychophysiological theory that takes cognitive, conditioning and physiologic factors into account is consistent with the total body of research accumulated to date. According to this approach, hyperventilation is related to panic in two ways: First, it is one of many processes that can lead to the perception of bodily sensations which may trigger positive feedback loops between sensations and anxiety responses. Second, because of the circular nature of such feedback processes, hyperventilation can also be a response to anxiety. In conclusion, hyperventilation is not uniquely relevant for panic, but the degree of overlap between the two phenomena gives it a prominent role as a trigger for panic and a vehicle for successful psychological treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 49-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90003-K","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80323750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90005-M
Ronald M Rapee
In the mid to late 1980s, a number of psychological models of panic disorder were presented. These models share a number of similarities and have generated a wealth of research examining their assumptions. Following discussion of some basic terminological issues, the current paper proceeds to a brief description of some of the psychological models of panic disorder and then follows with a review of the major empirical support for them. Finally, a modification of an earlier model is presented, based on recent empirical findings.
{"title":"Psychological factors in panic disorder","authors":"Ronald M Rapee","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90005-M","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90005-M","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the mid to late 1980s, a number of psychological models of panic disorder were presented. These models share a number of similarities and have generated a wealth of research examining their assumptions. Following discussion of some basic terminological issues, the current paper proceeds to a brief description of some of the psychological models of panic disorder and then follows with a review of the major empirical support for them. Finally, a modification of an earlier model is presented, based on recent empirical findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 85-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90005-M","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81128565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L
David M Clark
A variety of pharmacological and physiological procedures reliably induce panic attacks in panic disorder patients but rarely do so in controls. Some biologically orientated researchers have described these procedures as biological challenge tests and have assumed that pharmacological and physiological manipulations have a direct panic-inducing effect and that individuals who are susceptible to these manipulations have a neurochemical disorder. An alternative explanation is provided by the cognitive theory of panic which proposes that the challenge tests induce panic because they produce bodily sensations that panic patients are prone to misinterpret and that it is the misinterpretation which is responsible for the induced attack. Experiments that have attempted to test the cognitive mediation account of biological challenge induced panic are reviewed. Overall, the results of these experiments provide strong support for the cognitive mediation hypothesis. In addition, it is suggested that the crucial cognitive variable is likely to be interpretation of challenge induced sensations, not expected affect or perceived control of the sensations.
{"title":"Cognitive mediation of panic attacks induced by biological challenge tests","authors":"David M Clark","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A variety of pharmacological and physiological procedures reliably induce panic attacks in panic disorder patients but rarely do so in controls. Some biologically orientated researchers have described these procedures as biological challenge tests and have assumed that pharmacological and physiological manipulations have a direct panic-inducing effect and that individuals who are susceptible to these manipulations have a neurochemical disorder. An alternative explanation is provided by the cognitive theory of panic which proposes that the challenge tests induce panic because they produce bodily sensations that panic patients are prone to misinterpret and that it is the misinterpretation which is responsible for the induced attack. Experiments that have attempted to test the cognitive mediation account of biological challenge induced panic are reviewed. Overall, the results of these experiments provide strong support for the cognitive mediation hypothesis. In addition, it is suggested that the crucial cognitive variable is likely to be interpretation of challenge induced sensations, not expected affect or perceived control of the sensations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"Pages 75-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90004-L","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78703511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90019-X
Scott O Lilienfeld , Samuel M Turner , Rolf G Jacob
The construct of anxiety sensitivity (AS) has occupied an increasingly important place in theorizing and research on anxiety and anxiety disorders. Although a number of recent studies have provided support for the construct validity of the principal operationalization of AS, the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), the relation of the AS construct and the ASI to trait anxiety continues to be a source of controversy. Key issues in the AS-trait anxiety debate include the assimilative nature of traits and the concept of incremental validity. Recent research on AS lends some support to the claim that trait anxiety cannot fully account for AS findings. Important areas for future AS research include (1) demonstrating that AS is a risk factor for panic disorder and related conditions, lather than simply a consequence of these conditions, (2) developing and utilizing multiple operationalizations of constructs, (3) minimizing the impact of potentially inapplicable items, (4) testing for interactions between AS and other variables, and (5) testing hierarchical factor models that allow trait anxiety and AS to coexist as higher- and lower-order factors, respectively. Researchers in this area will need to develop alternative measures of the AS construct, recognize the distinction between different levels of trait specificity, clarify a number of theoretical issues relevant to the AS construct, and continue to subject predictions to stringent theoretical risks.
{"title":"Anxiety sensitivity: An examination of theoretical and methodological issues","authors":"Scott O Lilienfeld , Samuel M Turner , Rolf G Jacob","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90019-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90019-X","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construct of anxiety sensitivity (AS) has occupied an increasingly important place in theorizing and research on anxiety and anxiety disorders. Although a number of recent studies have provided support for the construct validity of the principal operationalization of AS, the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), the relation of the AS construct and the ASI to trait anxiety continues to be a source of controversy. Key issues in the AS-trait anxiety debate include the assimilative nature of traits and the concept of incremental validity. Recent research on AS lends some support to the claim that trait anxiety cannot fully account for AS findings. Important areas for future AS research include (1) demonstrating that AS is a risk factor for panic disorder and related conditions, lather than simply a consequence of these conditions, (2) developing and utilizing multiple operationalizations of constructs, (3) minimizing the impact of potentially inapplicable items, (4) testing for interactions between AS and other variables, and (5) testing hierarchical factor models that allow trait anxiety and AS to coexist as higher- and lower-order factors, respectively. Researchers in this area will need to develop alternative measures of the AS construct, recognize the distinction between different levels of trait specificity, clarify a number of theoretical issues relevant to the AS construct, and continue to subject predictions to stringent theoretical risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 147-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90019-X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82257708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90016-U
Danielle Devine , Patricia Long , Rex Forehand
This prospective study examined the role of personal and family factors during early adolescence in forecasting sexual activity, a behavior of major concern in the 1990s. Also, the correlates of late adolescent/young adult sexual activity, including delinquency and psychological adjustment, were examined. One hundred and thirty individuals were assessed at two points in time, during adolescence and six years later during late adolescence/young adulthood. Results supported the existing literature regarding the sexual activity of today's youth, indicating that the majority of both males and females are sexually active by late adolescence/young adulthood (age 18–21), and that the average adolescent/young adult has had multiple partners (females: 2–3; males: 3–4). For both males and females, adolescent sexual activity was correlated with problem behavior (i.e., delinquency), but rarely with prosocial behavior, during late adolescence/young adulthood. For females, but not for males, parental divorce during early adolescence was associated with earlier onset and greater frequency of sexual activity, as well as more sexual partners.
{"title":"A prospective study of adolescent sexual activity: Description, correlates, and predictors","authors":"Danielle Devine , Patricia Long , Rex Forehand","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90016-U","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90016-U","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This prospective study examined the role of personal and family factors during early adolescence in forecasting sexual activity, a behavior of major concern in the 1990s. Also, the correlates of late adolescent/young adult sexual activity, including delinquency and psychological adjustment, were examined. One hundred and thirty individuals were assessed at two points in time, during adolescence and six years later during late adolescence/young adulthood. Results supported the existing literature regarding the sexual activity of today's youth, indicating that the majority of both males and females are sexually active by late adolescence/young adulthood (age 18–21), and that the average adolescent/young adult has had multiple partners (females: 2–3; males: 3–4). For both males and females, adolescent sexual activity was correlated with problem behavior (i.e., delinquency), but rarely with prosocial behavior, during late adolescence/young adulthood. For females, but not for males, parental divorce during early adolescence was associated with earlier onset and greater frequency of sexual activity, as well as more sexual partners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 185-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90016-U","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82562105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S
Peter Muris , Peter J de Jong , Harald Merckelbach , Florence van Zuuren
In the present study, 36 spider phobics received a one-session exposure in vivo treatment. It was investigated whether a monitoring (information seeking) coping style affected treatment outcome. In general, therapy appeared to be very successful. Yet, monitoring was found to be related to larger relapse at one week follow-up. This finding is in conflict with an earlier study of Steketee, Bransfield, Miller, and Foa (1989) that showed a favorable treatment outcome for monitors (information seekers) as compared to blunters (information avoiders). Potential explanations for the seemingly conflicting results are discussed.
{"title":"Is exposure therapy outcome affected by a monitoring coping style?","authors":"Peter Muris , Peter J de Jong , Harald Merckelbach , Florence van Zuuren","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, 36 spider phobics received a one-session exposure in vivo treatment. It was investigated whether a monitoring (information seeking) coping style affected treatment outcome. In general, therapy appeared to be very successful. Yet, monitoring was found to be related to larger relapse at one week follow-up. This finding is in conflict with an earlier study of <span>Steketee, Bransfield, Miller, and Foa (1989)</span> that showed a favorable treatment outcome for monitors (information seekers) as compared to blunters (information avoiders). Potential explanations for the seemingly conflicting results are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 291-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90014-S","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76230889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1993-01-01DOI: 10.1016/0146-6402(93)90017-V
Joost Dekker , Peter H Mulder , Johannes W.J Bijlsma , Rob A.B Oostendorp
Exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) is controversial, because both improvement and deterioration of the patients' condition can be expected to occur. The literature was searched for studies on the outcome of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Twenty-four studies were identified, comprising nine controlled studies. In the present review, these studies are critically summarized. It was found that controlled studies have only reported improvements or non-significant results; deterioration of the patients' condition has not been reported. With regard to specific modalities of exercise therapy, it was found that aerobic exercise in RA-patients has been most thoroughly studied: improvements for specific categories of outcome (e.g., walking time and other sorts of observed disability) have been repeatedly reported, while for other categories of outcome (e.g., pain) non-significant results have been consistently reported. Several methodological deficiencies (concerning randomization, blinded evaluation and power) and assets (concerning compliance) in controlled studies are noted and evaluated. It is concluded that, despite several qualifications, the available evidence is in favor of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Neglected areas of research, including comparisons between subgroups of patients, are identified and suggestions for future research are given.
{"title":"Exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: A review","authors":"Joost Dekker , Peter H Mulder , Johannes W.J Bijlsma , Rob A.B Oostendorp","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90017-V","DOIUrl":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90017-V","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exercise therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) is controversial, because both improvement and deterioration of the patients' condition can be expected to occur. The literature was searched for studies on the outcome of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Twenty-four studies were identified, comprising nine controlled studies. In the present review, these studies are critically summarized. It was found that controlled studies have only reported improvements or non-significant results; deterioration of the patients' condition has not been reported. With regard to specific modalities of exercise therapy, it was found that aerobic exercise in RA-patients has been most thoroughly studied: improvements for specific categories of outcome (e.g., walking time and other sorts of observed disability) have been repeatedly reported, while for other categories of outcome (e.g., pain) non-significant results have been consistently reported. Several methodological deficiencies (concerning randomization, blinded evaluation and power) and assets (concerning compliance) in controlled studies are noted and evaluated. It is concluded that, despite several qualifications, the available evidence is in favor of exercise therapy in RA- and OA-patients. Neglected areas of research, including comparisons between subgroups of patients, are identified and suggestions for future research are given.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 211-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90017-V","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79223009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}