The present study explores the potential of producing an alternative ASTM Type IL portland-limestone cement (PLC) using up to 20 % eggshell powder (ESP) by mass as crushed ESP is similar in chemical composition to limestone. To this aim, the hydration, durability, and mechanical properties of the ESP blended cementitious system (using ASTM Type I/II portland cement) are compared to a commercially available ASTM Type IL cement system containing approximately 10 % limestone. ESP was prepared by milling for 3 h upon drying. Characterization of the ESP was done by x-ray diffraction for phase analysis, scanning electron microscopy for microstructural observation, and laser diffraction analysis for particle size distribution. A range of experimental tests were undertaken on both the ASTM Type I/II cement replaced with ESP and the ASTM Type IL systems. Results revealed that the utilization of up to 20 % ESP enhanced the heat of hydration secondary peak (C3A) by increasing the aluminate phase kinetics in the blended system at a favorable pH pore solution. Also, an accelerating effect on the setting time (increased by 20–100 mins) was observed for ESP samples. Chemical shrinkage, compressive strength, and degree of hydration were similar between the ESP and PLC samples. Results also revealed that ESP particles were relatively more effective in minimizing drying shrinkage by 20–35 %, which is attributed to possible internal curing effects. Overall, 10 % ESP blended with ASTM Type I/II cementitious system was similar to the 10 % limestone containing PLC system and could be used as waste material in producing an alternative ASTM Type IL cement.
The elastic stiffness of bulk concrete materials results from the complex interaction of aggregates, voids, and hydrated cement (which can have multiple hardened phases at multiple length scales). Given the complexities associated with understanding the arrangement of these particles within bulk concrete volumes, estimations for elastic modulus often rely on empirical correlations with unit weight and compressive strength. Such estimations are inherently scale-dependent and fail to capture variability in mix designs, particularly the variability found in specialty concrete mixes. To develop a scale-independent method for estimating elastic modulus from mix-design volume fraction information, this study explores a novel bottom-up approach using cement paste phase stiffness values determined through micro-mechanical experimentation and randomized Monte-Carlo spring arrangement simulations. Statistical representations of cement paste phase stiffness distributions and bulk volume fraction data are combined to provide estimations for elastic stiffness in both the composite cement paste and bulk concrete containing fine aggregate and fibers. Resulting a priori estimations of UHPC cement paste stiffness from the micro-mechanical upscaling simulations were within 4% of measured values (based on mix-design and void volume fraction information alone) for a selected sample of mix proportions. When applied to the two UHPC mixes containing fibers and fine aggregate, upscaling simulations consistently overpredicted the measured elastic modulus, likely due to the aggregate-cement interfacial transition zone (ITZ) properties that were not captured in the micro-mechanical testing.

