首页 > 最新文献

Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)最新文献

英文 中文
Study into the use of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer in a third level hospital 西妥昔单抗在三甲医院转移性结直肠癌治疗中的应用研究
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70072-3
J.F. Marín Pozo, B. Oya Álvarez de Morales, I. Caba Porras, J. Aranda García

Objectives

In this study we will analyse the use of cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) in a third level hospital. We will establish the usage conditions in our centre in keeping with those approved in current technical records. We will also record the treatment duration under the different usage conditions and use the information available in material that has been published to date.

Methods

An indication-prescription study of cetuximab in MCC was carried out on all patients treated with cetuximab for colorectal cancer in the period between 2004 and 2007 in our hospital. The number of prescriptions that do not fit the approved recommendations for cetuximab in MCC treatment (and why they do not fit) is determined. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out for the different variables collected, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out for the treatment duration variable, so as to determine whether there is a difference in effectiveness for the common uses in our hospital.

Results

Data was recorded for 74 patients treated with cetuximab. The average cost per patient was €14 399 and on average, 15.3 dosages were administered per patient. The average initial dosage was 710 mg with an average dosage of 446 mg after that. The average duration of the treatments was 15.4 weeks. cetuximab was administered to 7 patients as first-line treatment and to 32 patients who had not used irinotecan previously. Irinotecan was not associated with cetuximab treatment in 9 patients, and it was used in 14 patients resulting in a negative outcome for the EFGR test. Treatment duration was longer in the case of its use as first-line treatment (27.7 weeks), if irinotecan had not been used before (23.3 weeks), if irinotecan was used (20.5 weeks) and in patients with positive EFGR results (19.6 weeks.) The median treatment duration, under the different conditions, was less than the average but with no major differences between them. 70.3% of prescriptions did not fit with the data sheet.

Conclusions

The use of cetuximab under different conditions to those approved on the technical data sheet creates an increase in the number of patients treated and a longer duration of the treatments which implies an increase in intake. The average and the mean treatment times for the usage conditions found did not present any significant statistical differences. There are a small number of patients who benefit from this treatment which can be seen by the large average, in comparison with the mean, without any of the conditions in which the analysis was carried out seeming to determine a higher response. The treatment duration in our study was similar to the durations recorded in relevant literature for these usage conditions.

目的分析西妥昔单抗在某三级医院治疗转移性结直肠癌(MCC)中的应用情况。我们将根据当前技术记录中批准的使用条件在本中心建立使用条件。我们还将记录不同使用条件下的治疗持续时间,并使用迄今为止已发表的材料中提供的信息。方法对我院2004 ~ 2007年接受西妥昔单抗治疗的结直肠癌患者进行MCC的适应症处方研究。确定了不符合批准的西妥昔单抗治疗MCC建议的处方数量(以及不符合的原因)。对收集到的不同变量进行描述性统计分析,对治疗持续时间变量进行Kaplan-Meier分析,以确定我院常用药物的疗效是否存在差异。结果记录了74例西妥昔单抗治疗患者的数据。每位患者的平均费用为14399欧元,每位患者平均服用15.3剂。平均初始剂量为710 mg,之后平均剂量为446 mg。平均治疗时间为15.4周。7例患者给予西妥昔单抗作为一线治疗,32例患者先前未使用伊立替康。在9例患者中,伊立替康与西妥昔单抗治疗不相关,在14例患者中使用伊立替康导致EFGR试验结果为阴性。使用伊立替康作为一线治疗(27.7周)、未使用伊立替康(23.3周)、使用伊立替康(20.5周)和EFGR阳性患者(19.6周)的治疗时间更长。不同条件下的中位治疗时间均小于平均值,但两者之间无显著差异。70.3%的处方与说明书不符。结论西妥昔单抗在不同于技术数据表批准的条件下的使用会导致治疗人数的增加和治疗持续时间的延长,这意味着摄入量的增加。所发现的使用条件的平均和平均处理时间没有任何显著的统计学差异。有一小部分患者从这种治疗中受益,这可以从大的平均值中看出,与平均值相比,没有任何进行分析的条件似乎决定了更高的反应。本研究的治疗持续时间与相关文献中记录的这些使用条件的持续时间相似。
{"title":"Study into the use of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer in a third level hospital","authors":"J.F. Marín Pozo,&nbsp;B. Oya Álvarez de Morales,&nbsp;I. Caba Porras,&nbsp;J. Aranda García","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70072-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70072-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In this study we will analyse the use of cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC) in a third level hospital. We will establish the usage conditions in our centre in keeping with those approved in current technical records. We will also record the treatment duration under the different usage conditions and use the information available in material that has been published to date.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An indication-prescription study of cetuximab in MCC was carried out on all patients treated with cetuximab for colorectal cancer in the period between 2004 and 2007 in our hospital. The number of prescriptions that do not fit the approved recommendations for cetuximab in MCC treatment (and why they do not fit) is determined. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out for the different variables collected, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out for the treatment duration variable, so as to determine whether there is a difference in effectiveness for the common uses in our hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data was recorded for 74 patients treated with cetuximab. The average cost per patient was €14 399 and on average, 15.3 dosages were administered per patient. The average initial dosage was 710<!--> <!-->mg with an average dosage of 446<!--> <!-->mg after that. The average duration of the treatments was 15.4 weeks. cetuximab was administered to 7 patients as first-line treatment and to 32 patients who had not used irinotecan previously. Irinotecan was not associated with cetuximab treatment in 9 patients, and it was used in 14 patients resulting in a negative outcome for the EFGR test. Treatment duration was longer in the case of its use as first-line treatment (27.7 weeks), if irinotecan had not been used before (23.3 weeks), if irinotecan was used (20.5 weeks) and in patients with positive EFGR results (19.6 weeks.) The median treatment duration, under the different conditions, was less than the average but with no major differences between them. 70.3% of prescriptions did not fit with the data sheet.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of cetuximab under different conditions to those approved on the technical data sheet creates an increase in the number of patients treated and a longer duration of the treatments which implies an increase in intake. The average and the mean treatment times for the usage conditions found did not present any significant statistical differences. There are a small number of patients who benefit from this treatment which can be seen by the large average, in comparison with the mean, without any of the conditions in which the analysis was carried out seeming to determine a higher response. The treatment duration in our study was similar to the durations recorded in relevant literature for these usage conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 72-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70072-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56620392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Effectiveness and safety of erlotinib in 2 patients with carcinoma of the cervix 厄洛替尼治疗2例宫颈癌的有效性和安全性
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70075-9
I. Pérez Rodrigo , R. Albornoz López , M. Soto Rojas , I. Fernández García , V. Torres Degayón

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and safety of the use of erlotinib in the treatment of refractory cervical cancer after retrospective analysis of 2 clinical cases.

Methods

The clinical records were assessed for the patients who started treatment with erlotinib, on a compassionate-use basis, with an oral dosage of 150 mg/day until June 2008. The pharmacy dispensing records were also assessed to evaluate adherence to treatment. Progression-free survival was assessed and adverse reactions were recorded in the medical records.

Results

Three patients with recurrent, advanced cervical cancer were candidates for treatment with erlotinib, 2 of whom were only starting treatment. In both cases, the women had previously received between 3 and 4 different treatment lines. Progression-free survival was 6 months and 4 months in each case. The adverse reactions to the treatment were slight.

Conclusions

Erlotinib presented some similar results to those obtained from cisplatin doublets in women with refractory cervical cancer, with minor adverse effects. However, these results need to be corroborated in the clinical studies field on a wider section of the population.

目的通过对2例临床病例的回顾性分析,评价厄洛替尼治疗难治性宫颈癌的有效性和安全性。方法对开始厄洛替尼治疗的患者的临床记录进行评估,在同情使用的基础上,口服剂量为150mg /d,直到2008年6月。还评估了药房配药记录,以评估对治疗的依从性。评估无进展生存期,并在医疗记录中记录不良反应。结果3例复发、晚期宫颈癌患者为厄洛替尼治疗候选者,其中2例刚开始治疗。在这两种情况下,女性之前都接受过3到4种不同的治疗方案。无进展生存期分别为6个月和4个月。这种治疗的不良反应很轻微。结论塞洛替尼治疗难治性宫颈癌的效果与顺铂双药相似,不良反应较小。然而,这些结果需要在更广泛的人群的临床研究领域得到证实。
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of erlotinib in 2 patients with carcinoma of the cervix","authors":"I. Pérez Rodrigo ,&nbsp;R. Albornoz López ,&nbsp;M. Soto Rojas ,&nbsp;I. Fernández García ,&nbsp;V. Torres Degayón","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70075-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70075-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of the use of erlotinib in the treatment of refractory cervical cancer after retrospective analysis of 2 clinical cases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The clinical records were assessed for the patients who started treatment with erlotinib, on a compassionate-use basis, with an oral dosage of 150<!--> <!-->mg/day until June 2008. The pharmacy dispensing records were also assessed to evaluate adherence to treatment. Progression-free survival was assessed and adverse reactions were recorded in the medical records.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three patients with recurrent, advanced cervical cancer were candidates for treatment with erlotinib, 2 of whom were only starting treatment. In both cases, the women had previously received between 3 and 4 different treatment lines. Progression-free survival was 6 months and 4 months in each case. The adverse reactions to the treatment were slight.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Erlotinib presented some similar results to those obtained from cisplatin doublets in women with refractory cervical cancer, with minor adverse effects. However, these results need to be corroborated in the clinical studies field on a wider section of the population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 96-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70075-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56620462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Study of rituximab efficacy, cost, safety, and compliance of its package leaflet in a tertiary hospital 某三级医院利妥昔单抗疗效、成本、安全性及包装说明书依从性的研究
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70094-2
M.C. Conde García , M.A. Fernández Feijoo , M.A. Calleja Hernández

Introduction

The appearance of monoclonal antibodies, and specifically, rituximab, has provided a new approach to treating non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study is to analyse whether this drug is used according to its package leaflet in clinical practice, evaluate the treatment's efficacy, and determine its cost.

Methods

Ambispective, observational single-centre study of medication use set up as a prescription evaluation for the indication of rituximab in a tertiary hospital between March 2003 and December 31, 2007.

Results

Eighty-two of the 221 patients who were treated (37.1%) received the drug for a condition that does not appear in the package leaflet. Fifty-one point one percent and 27.5% of response and progression were registered for approved diagnoses and 34.9% and 47% for nonapproved diagnoses; the death rate was 25.3% and 41.5% respectively. The mean cost per treatment episode was the highest for idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura (#euro11 683), whilst the highest treatment cost per patient was associated with follicular lymphoma (€15 940).

Discussion

We found that the main cause of the high rate of non-compliance with the package leaflet is patient lack of response to standard treatments, together with clinical practice guides that support the use of rituximab for conditions other than those for which it is indicated. Nevertheless, most of the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of rituximab for these unauthorised diagnostic profiles have poor methodology, are in phase II, are open studies, have low patient numbers, or in some cases, are not comparative.

单克隆抗体的出现,特别是利妥昔单抗的出现,为治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤和类风湿性关节炎提供了新的途径。本研究的目的是分析该药物在临床实践中是否按照其包装说明书使用,评估治疗效果,确定其成本。方法对2003年3月至2007年12月31日某三级医院利妥昔单抗适应症处方用药情况进行双视角、单中心观察性研究。结果221例患者中,有82例(37.1%)的用药情况未在药品说明书中注明。批准诊断的缓解率和进展率分别为51.1%和27.5%,未批准诊断的缓解率和进展率分别为34.9%和47%;死亡率分别为25.3%和41.5%。特发性血小板减少性紫癜每次治疗的平均费用最高(11 683欧元),而每位患者的最高治疗费用与滤泡性淋巴瘤相关(15 940欧元)。我们发现,不遵守包装说明书的高发生率的主要原因是患者对标准治疗缺乏反应,以及临床实践指南支持使用利妥昔单抗治疗非指征性疾病。然而,大多数评估利妥昔单抗对这些未经授权的诊断特征的疗效的临床试验方法不佳,处于II期,是开放研究,患者人数少,或者在某些情况下,不具有可比性。
{"title":"Study of rituximab efficacy, cost, safety, and compliance of its package leaflet in a tertiary hospital","authors":"M.C. Conde García ,&nbsp;M.A. Fernández Feijoo ,&nbsp;M.A. Calleja Hernández","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70094-2","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70094-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The appearance of monoclonal antibodies, and specifically, rituximab, has provided a new approach to treating non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and rheumatoid arthritis. The purpose of this study is to analyse whether this drug is used according to its package leaflet in clinical practice, evaluate the treatment's efficacy, and determine its cost.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ambispective, observational single-centre study of medication use set up as a prescription evaluation for the indication of rituximab in a tertiary hospital between March 2003 and December 31, 2007.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-two of the 221 patients who were treated (37.1%) received the drug for a condition that does not appear in the package leaflet. Fifty-one point one percent and 27.5% of response and progression were registered for approved diagnoses and 34.9% and 47% for nonapproved diagnoses; the death rate was 25.3% and 41.5% respectively. The mean cost per treatment episode was the highest for idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura (#euro11 683), whilst the highest treatment cost per patient was associated with follicular lymphoma (€15 940).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>We found that the main cause of the high rate of non-compliance with the package leaflet is patient lack of response to standard treatments, together with clinical practice guides that support the use of rituximab for conditions other than those for which it is indicated. Nevertheless, most of the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of rituximab for these unauthorised diagnostic profiles have poor methodology, are in phase II, are open studies, have low patient numbers, or in some cases, are not comparative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 6","pages":"Pages 305-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70094-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56620737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Therapeutic use and profile of toxicity of the FOLFOX4 regimen FOLFOX4方案的治疗用途和毒性概况
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70074-7
B. Fernández-Lobato , M.S. Díaz-Carrasco , A. Pareja , M. Marín , N. Vila , A. de la Rubia

Introduction

Since the publication of the MOSAIC test results in 2004, the FOLFOX4 regimen has been established as an adjuvant treatment which is recommended in stage III colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the use of this regimen in our field and to describe its toxicity.

Methods

Descriptive study of treatments with FOLFOX4 prescribed between April 2005 and March 2007. The data was obtained from the Farhos Oncología® programme and clinical records. The following data was collected: age, gender, diagnosis, stage of the illness (TNM classification), and adverse reactions, expressing severity according to Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0.

Results

The FOLFOX4 regimen was prescribed for 39 patients (24 men and 15 women) with an average age of 59. The diagnoses were: 28 colon cancer (4 stage II, 17 stage III, and 7 stage IV), 10 rectal cancer (1 stage II, 4 stage III, and 5 stage IV), and 1 stage IV gastric cancer. The most frequent adverse reactions were peripheral neuropathy (82%), neutropaenia (56.4%), and diarrhoea (53.9%). When the study was completed, 9 patients continued active treatment with the regimen (average, 6.8 cycles). Of the 30 remaining patients only 16 people completed the 12 planned cycles. Forteen patients stopped their treatment (average, 8.1 cycles) due to toxicity in 10 cases, clinical progression in 3 cases, and 1 patient died. Of the total 368 cycles administered, 68 suffered administration delays and 22 had the dosage reduced.

Conclusion

The use of the FOLFOX4 regimen has been adjusted to uses with some solid scientific evidence, but its toxicity has limited its use and has made administering the planned dosage levels difficult.

自2004年MOSAIC试验结果发表以来,FOLFOX4方案已被确立为推荐用于III期结直肠癌的辅助治疗。本研究的目的是评估该方案在我们领域的使用,并描述其毒性。方法对2005年4月至2007年3月间使用FOLFOX4治疗的病例进行描述性研究。数据来自Farhos Oncología®项目和临床记录。收集以下资料:年龄、性别、诊断、疾病分期(TNM分类)、不良反应,按照通用毒性标准2.0表达严重程度。结果39例患者采用FOLFOX4方案治疗,其中男性24例,女性15例,平均年龄59岁。诊断为:28例结肠癌(4例II期,17例III期,7例IV期),10例直肠癌(1例II期,4例III期,5例IV期),1例IV期胃癌。最常见的不良反应是周围神经病变(82%)、中性粒细胞减少(56.4%)和腹泻(53.9%)。当研究完成时,9名患者继续积极治疗该方案(平均,6.8周期)。在剩下的30名患者中,只有16人完成了计划的12个周期。14例患者因毒副作用停药10例(平均8.1周期),3例临床进展,1例死亡。在总共368个疗程中,68个疗程出现给药延迟,22个疗程剂量减少。结论FOLFOX4方案的使用已经有了一些可靠的科学依据,但其毒性限制了其使用,并使其难以达到计划剂量水平。
{"title":"Therapeutic use and profile of toxicity of the FOLFOX4 regimen","authors":"B. Fernández-Lobato ,&nbsp;M.S. Díaz-Carrasco ,&nbsp;A. Pareja ,&nbsp;M. Marín ,&nbsp;N. Vila ,&nbsp;A. de la Rubia","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70074-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70074-7","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Since the publication of the MOSAIC test results in 2004, the FOLFOX4 regimen has been established as an adjuvant treatment which is recommended in stage III colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the use of this regimen in our field and to describe its toxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive study of treatments with FOLFOX4 prescribed between April 2005 and March 2007. The data was obtained from the Farhos Oncología® programme and clinical records. The following data was collected: age, gender, diagnosis, stage of the illness (TNM classification), and adverse reactions, expressing severity according to Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The FOLFOX4 regimen was prescribed for 39 patients (24 men and 15 women) with an average age of 59. The diagnoses were: 28 colon cancer (4 stage II, 17 stage III, and 7 stage IV), 10 rectal cancer (1 stage II, 4 stage III, and 5 stage IV), and 1 stage IV gastric cancer. The most frequent adverse reactions were peripheral neuropathy (82%), neutropaenia (56.4%), and diarrhoea (53.9%). When the study was completed, 9 patients continued active treatment with the regimen (average, 6.8 cycles). Of the 30 remaining patients only 16 people completed the 12 planned cycles. Forteen patients stopped their treatment (average, 8.1 cycles) due to toxicity in 10 cases, clinical progression in 3 cases, and 1 patient died. Of the total 368 cycles administered, 68 suffered administration delays and 22 had the dosage reduced.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of the FOLFOX4 regimen has been adjusted to uses with some solid scientific evidence, but its toxicity has limited its use and has made administering the planned dosage levels difficult.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 89-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70074-7","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77806180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Biologic therapies for systemic autoimmune diseases. Are expectations met? 系统性自身免疫性疾病的生物疗法。是否达到了预期?
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70070-X
L. Pallarés Ferreres , M. Ramos-Casals
{"title":"Biologic therapies for systemic autoimmune diseases. Are expectations met?","authors":"L. Pallarés Ferreres ,&nbsp;M. Ramos-Casals","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70070-X","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70070-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 63-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70070-X","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79290506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishment of a quality indicator for pharmaceutical care 建立药学服务质量指标
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70093-0
M. Gaspar , M. Caja , I. Romero , L. Moreno Royo , A. García-Vivó , V. Tudela , M. Piquer

Objective

To establish a quality indicator for pharmaceutical care in an integral system for personalised medication dispensing (ISPMD) with electronic prescription.

Methods

Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2007. On a daily basis, we revised the pharmaceutical treatment of patients admitted to hospital units with ISPMD. Study variables: a) suitability of pharmaceutical interventions: important or very important; b) acceptance of those interventions. The LASER® method was used to identify patients with improvement opportunities.

Results

In absolute terms (mean [SD]): important pharmaceutical interventions, 26.6 (14.8); very important, 31.5 (24.6); acceptance, 57.5 (25.9). Percentages (95% CI): pharmaceutical interventions: important, 33.7 (9.3–58.0); very important, 39.80 (17.7–62.2); acceptance, 72.6 (64.7–80.5).

Conclusions

Implementation of the quality indicator for pharmaceutical care allowed us to evaluate the clinical significance and the acceptance rate of the pharmaceutical care being provided.

目的建立电子处方个性化配药集成系统中药学服务质量指标。方法描述性横向研究。期:2007。我们每天都在修改医院收治的ISPMD患者的药物治疗方案。研究变量:a)药物干预的适宜性:重要或非常重要;B)接受这些干预措施。使用LASER®方法识别有改善机会的患者。结果绝对项(mean [SD]):重要药物干预措施26.6 (14.8);非常重要,31.5 (24.6);验收,57.5(25.9)。百分比(95% CI):药物干预:重要,33.7 (9.3-58.0);非常重要,39.80 (17.7-62.2);验收,72.6(64.7-80.5)。结论实施药学服务质量指标,可以对所提供的药学服务的临床意义和接受程度进行评价。
{"title":"Establishment of a quality indicator for pharmaceutical care","authors":"M. Gaspar ,&nbsp;M. Caja ,&nbsp;I. Romero ,&nbsp;L. Moreno Royo ,&nbsp;A. García-Vivó ,&nbsp;V. Tudela ,&nbsp;M. Piquer","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70093-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70093-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To establish a quality indicator for pharmaceutical care in an integral system for personalised medication dispensing (ISPMD) with electronic prescription.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive transversal study. Period: 2007. On a daily basis, we revised the pharmaceutical treatment of patients admitted to hospital units with ISPMD. Study variables: a) suitability of pharmaceutical interventions: important or very important; b) acceptance of those interventions. The LASER® method was used to identify patients with improvement opportunities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In absolute terms (mean [SD]): important pharmaceutical interventions, 26.6 (14.8); very important, 31.5 (24.6); acceptance, 57.5 (25.9). Percentages (95% CI): pharmaceutical interventions: important, 33.7 (9.3–58.0); very important, 39.80 (17.7–62.2); acceptance, 72.6 (64.7–80.5).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Implementation of the quality indicator for pharmaceutical care allowed us to evaluate the clinical significance and the acceptance rate of the pharmaceutical care being provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 6","pages":"Pages 296-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70093-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73758100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The influence of alternative medicine in highly active antiretroviral treatment 替代药物对高活性抗逆转录病毒治疗的影响
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70066-8
M. Vázquez Hernández , M.F. Hurtado Gómez , J.R. Blanco

Objective

Over the last few years, there has been a notable increase in the use of alternative medicine by the general population. The aim of this study is 2-fold. Firstly we will analyse the incidence of the use of medicinal plants in patients with HIV undergoing Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART). Secondly, with the help of existing bibliographic information, we want to study the existence of possible interactions.

Material and method

We carried out a prospective study with a targeted interview (October to December 2007) on consenting patients with HIV undergoing HAART treatment.

Results

Of the 193 patients that agreed to take part in the survey, 16.6% confirmed they used alternative medicinal therapies. In 46% of the cases there was a potential interaction with the effectiveness of HAART. Forty-six percent of the potential interactions were in the case of the patients who used grapefruit as an alternative medicine, 21% in the case of patients using thistle and Echinacea respectively, 4% for those using omega-3, Chinese herbs, and ginseng.

Conclusion

There is a significant use of natural products by these groups of patients, of which a significant percentage interact with HAART. A better understanding of the possible interactions with HAART and improved information offered to patients with HIV is needed.

目的在过去的几年里,普通人群中替代医学的使用有了显著的增加。这项研究的目的是双重的。首先,我们将分析在接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)的艾滋病毒患者中使用药用植物的发生率。其次,借助已有的书目信息,研究可能存在的交互作用。材料与方法我们在2007年10月至12月对接受HAART治疗的HIV患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。结果在同意参加调查的193名患者中,16.6%的人确认他们使用了替代药物疗法。在46%的病例中,与HAART的有效性存在潜在的相互作用。46%的潜在相互作用发生在使用葡萄柚作为替代药物的患者中,21%的患者分别使用蓟和紫锥菊,4%的患者使用omega-3,中草药和人参。结论这类患者大量使用天然药物,其中与HAART相互作用的比例较高。需要更好地了解与HAART的可能相互作用,并改进向艾滋病毒患者提供的信息。
{"title":"The influence of alternative medicine in highly active antiretroviral treatment","authors":"M. Vázquez Hernández ,&nbsp;M.F. Hurtado Gómez ,&nbsp;J.R. Blanco","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70066-8","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70066-8","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Over the last few years, there has been a notable increase in the use of alternative medicine by the general population. The aim of this study is 2-fold. Firstly we will analyse the incidence of the use of medicinal plants in patients with HIV undergoing Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART). Secondly, with the help of existing bibliographic information, we want to study the existence of possible interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>We carried out a prospective study with a targeted interview (October to December 2007) on consenting patients with HIV undergoing HAART treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 193 patients that agreed to take part in the survey, 16.6% confirmed they used alternative medicinal therapies. In 46% of the cases there was a potential interaction with the effectiveness of HAART. Forty-six percent of the potential interactions were in the case of the patients who used grapefruit as an alternative medicine, 21% in the case of patients using thistle and Echinacea respectively, 4% for those using omega-3, Chinese herbs, and ginseng.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a significant use of natural products by these groups of patients, of which a significant percentage interact with HAART. A better understanding of the possible interactions with HAART and improved information offered to patients with HIV is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 31-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70066-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80078963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Work of a multidisciplinary team in the control of the prescription of ertapenem 多学科团队在厄他培南处方控制中的工作
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70069-3
M.V. Gil-Navarro , R. Muñoz-Corte , M. Herrero Romero , M.D. Santos Rubio , E. Cordero Matía , J. Bautista Paloma

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of the intervention of a multidiscipline antimicrobial control group in the correct prescription of Ertapenem.

Method

A 4-month long, prospective study into prescriptions for ertapenem was carried out in a third-level hospital. Assessment into the degree of suitability of each prescription according to the infections commission usage criteria. In the situation where prescriptions were not suitable, recommendations were given and acceptance of this was recorded. The effectiveness of the antimicrobial treatment used was assessed and treatment was considered effective when there was remission of the signs and symptoms of the infection when the treatment was completed. The treatment was considered to have failed when the signs and symptoms of infection persisted or progressed, requiring the addition of another antimicrobial agent, changing antibiotics or the prolongation of the treatment for longer than 2 weeks. Lastly, the differences in the average length of stay and the duration of the antibiotic treatment between groups were analysed.

Results

Forty-eight prescriptions were assessed. The usage criterion was adequate in 48% of cases, with 78% effectiveness in this group. In the cases where the prescription was not adequate, but a change in prescription was accepted, the effectiveness was 92%, with 55.5% of those cases not accepting recommendation for change. The average stay was higher in this last group (P=.07). The duration of the antibiotic treatment in the patients who accepted the change in prescription was significantly less than in those who did not accept it (2 vs 7.4 days, P<.0001).

Conclusions

The control of ertapenem prescriptions by a multidisciplinary group was effective.

目的探讨多学科抗菌对照组对厄他培南正确处方的干预效果。方法在某三级医院对厄他培南的处方进行为期4个月的前瞻性研究。根据感染委员会的使用标准对各处方的适宜程度进行评估。在处方不合适的情况下,提出建议并记录接受情况。评估所使用的抗菌素治疗的有效性,当治疗完成后感染的体征和症状缓解时,认为治疗有效。当感染的体征和症状持续或进展,需要添加另一种抗菌剂,更换抗生素或延长治疗时间超过2周时,则认为治疗失败。最后,分析了组间平均住院时间和抗生素治疗持续时间的差异。结果共评价处方48张。使用标准在48%的病例中是适当的,在该组中有78%的有效性。在处方不充分但接受改变处方的情况下,有效性为92%,其中55.5%的病例不接受改变建议。最后一组的平均住院时间更长(P=.07)。接受处方改变的患者的抗生素治疗持续时间明显少于未接受处方改变的患者(2天vs 7.4天,p < 0.01)。结论多学科组对厄他培南处方的控制是有效的。
{"title":"Work of a multidisciplinary team in the control of the prescription of ertapenem","authors":"M.V. Gil-Navarro ,&nbsp;R. Muñoz-Corte ,&nbsp;M. Herrero Romero ,&nbsp;M.D. Santos Rubio ,&nbsp;E. Cordero Matía ,&nbsp;J. Bautista Paloma","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70069-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70069-3","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the effectiveness of the intervention of a multidiscipline antimicrobial control group in the correct prescription of Ertapenem.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A 4-month long, prospective study into prescriptions for ertapenem was carried out in a third-level hospital. Assessment into the degree of suitability of each prescription according to the infections commission usage criteria. In the situation where prescriptions were not suitable, recommendations were given and acceptance of this was recorded. The effectiveness of the antimicrobial treatment used was assessed and treatment was considered effective when there was remission of the signs and symptoms of the infection when the treatment was completed. The treatment was considered to have failed when the signs and symptoms of infection persisted or progressed, requiring the addition of another antimicrobial agent, changing antibiotics or the prolongation of the treatment for longer than 2 weeks. Lastly, the differences in the average length of stay and the duration of the antibiotic treatment between groups were analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-eight prescriptions were assessed. The usage criterion was adequate in 48% of cases, with 78% effectiveness in this group. In the cases where the prescription was not adequate, but a change in prescription was accepted, the effectiveness was 92%, with 55.5% of those cases not accepting recommendation for change. The average stay was higher in this last group (P=.07). The duration of the antibiotic treatment in the patients who accepted the change in prescription was significantly less than in those who did not accept it (2 vs 7.4 days, P&lt;.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The control of ertapenem prescriptions by a multidisciplinary group was effective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 48-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70069-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84498706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Negative results related to drugs required in hospitalisation 与住院期间所需药物相关的阴性结果
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70064-4
A. Santamaría-Pablos , C. Redondo-Figuero , M.I. Baena , M.J. Faus , R. Tejido , O. Acha , F.J. Novo

Objective

To assess the prevalence of negative clinical outcomes associated with medication as a cause of hospital admission and to determine their characteristics (types, categories, avoidability, severity, and the drug groups involved). To determine possible risk factors related to the appearance of this problem.

Method

An observational study carried out over a 3 month period in a department of the university hospital, 163 patients were selected at random. The information obtained from the patient interview, the revision of clinical records and clinical sessions were used to then identify negative clinical outcomes using the Dader method.

Results

In 27 cases (16.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6–23.0), negative clinical outcomes associated with medication were considered to be the main cause of hospital admission. The most frequent negative clinical outcomes associated with medication were untreated health problems, non-quantitative ineffectiveness, and quantitative safety problems respectively. The overall prevalence of preventable admissions due to negative clinical outcomes associated with medication was 88.9%; (95% CI, 71.9–96.1). With regards to severity, 74.1% (95% CI, 55.3–86.1) of the total admissions were moderate. The most common drugs implicated in hospital admissions were: antibacterial for systemic use, cardiovascular, and non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Apart from age, no other factors were found for hospital admissions due to negative results associated with medication.

Conclusions

Negative clinical outcomes associated with medication as cause of hospital admission are a prevalent problem and most of them are avoidable with pharmacotherapeutic follow-up.

目的评估与药物治疗相关的不良临床结果的发生率,并确定其特征(类型、类别、可避免性、严重程度和涉及的药物组)。确定与该问题出现相关的可能风险因素。方法在大学附属医院某科室进行为期3个月的观察性研究,随机抽取163例患者。从患者访谈、临床记录的修订和临床会话中获得的信息,然后使用Dader方法确定阴性临床结果。结果27例(16.6%);95%可信区间[CI], 1.6-23.0),与药物相关的临床不良结果被认为是住院的主要原因。与药物相关的最常见的负面临床结果分别是未经治疗的健康问题、非定量的无效和定量的安全性问题。由于与药物相关的负面临床结果导致的可预防入院的总体患病率为88.9%;(95% ci, 71.9-96.1)。在严重程度方面,74.1% (95% CI, 55.3-86.1)的患者为中度。与住院有关的最常见药物是:全身使用的抗菌药物、心血管药物和非甾体抗炎药。除年龄外,没有发现其他因素与药物相关的负面结果有关。结论以药物治疗为住院原因的临床不良反应是一个普遍存在的问题,其中大部分通过药物治疗随访是可以避免的。
{"title":"Negative results related to drugs required in hospitalisation","authors":"A. Santamaría-Pablos ,&nbsp;C. Redondo-Figuero ,&nbsp;M.I. Baena ,&nbsp;M.J. Faus ,&nbsp;R. Tejido ,&nbsp;O. Acha ,&nbsp;F.J. Novo","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70064-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70064-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the prevalence of negative clinical outcomes associated with medication as a cause of hospital admission and to determine their characteristics (types, categories, avoidability, severity, and the drug groups involved). To determine possible risk factors related to the appearance of this problem.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>An observational study carried out over a 3 month period in a department of the university hospital, 163 patients were selected at random. The information obtained from the patient interview, the revision of clinical records and clinical sessions were used to then identify negative clinical outcomes using the Dader method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 27 cases (16.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6–23.0), negative clinical outcomes associated with medication were considered to be the main cause of hospital admission. The most frequent negative clinical outcomes associated with medication were untreated health problems, non-quantitative ineffectiveness, and quantitative safety problems respectively. The overall prevalence of preventable admissions due to negative clinical outcomes associated with medication was 88.9%; (95% CI, 71.9–96.1). With regards to severity, 74.1% (95% CI, 55.3–86.1) of the total admissions were moderate. The most common drugs implicated in hospital admissions were: antibacterial for systemic use, cardiovascular, and non steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Apart from age, no other factors were found for hospital admissions due to negative results associated with medication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Negative clinical outcomes associated with medication as cause of hospital admission are a prevalent problem and most of them are avoidable with pharmacotherapeutic follow-up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 12-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70064-4","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81955980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Comparison of two formulae for the calculation of glomerular filtration in the dosage of zoledronic acid 两种计算唑来膦酸剂量肾小球滤过率公式的比较
Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70065-6
E. Ramírez Herráiz , N. Garrido Peño , R. Díez Fernández , A.M. Iglesias Bolaños , M. Arteta Jiménez

Objective

To validate the use of a formula that does not require the patient's weight (Levey formula) for calculating creatinine clearance in the adjustment of the dosage of zoledronic acid.

Method

Prospective observational study in which zoledronic acid prescriptions in the Oncology and Haematology departments were recorded over the course of 8 months. The adjustment of the dose of zoledronic acid was carried out in accordance with creatinine clearance obtained using 2 different equations; the Cockcroft-Gault equation which is based on medical records, and the Levey formula which does not require the patient's weight for the calculation. The results of zoledronic acid dosage from both equations were compared using the SPSS statistics programme, via the comparison of the 2 measurements using the t Student-Fisher (t test).

Results

The t test provided a t test value of t = −3.366, with 112 degrees of freedom and a degree of bilateral importance of P = .001. The difference between both measurements was d = −0.051[0.162]) and the confidence interval was 95%, −0.082 to −0.021. From the data obtained in the t test, the degree of bilateral importance (P=.001 <.05) indicated that the results of the test were statistically significant.

Conclusions

The difference between the dosages obtained when comparing both methods of glomerular filtration is statistically significant, although not clinically relevant, therefore the MDRD-4 formula (Levey) could be used if the patient's weight is not available.

目的验证在调整唑来膦酸剂量时使用不需要体重的计算公式(Levey公式)计算肌酐清除率的可行性。方法前瞻性观察研究,记录肿瘤和血液科8个月的唑来膦酸处方。根据2种不同方程得到的肌酐清除率进行唑来膦酸剂量的调整;基于医疗记录的Cockcroft-Gault方程,以及不需要病人体重计算的Levey公式。使用SPSS统计程序对两个方程的唑来膦酸剂量结果进行比较,采用t- Student-Fisher (t检验)对两个测量值进行比较。结果t检验的t检验值为t = - 3.366,自由度为112,双侧重要度P = 0.001。两个测量值之间的差异为d = - 0.051[0.162]),置信区间为95%,为- 0.082至- 0.021。从t检验得到的数据来看,双侧重要程度(P=。0.001 <.05)表明检验结果具有统计学意义。结论对比两种肾小球滤过法所得剂量差异有统计学意义,但无临床相关性,故在患者体重不详时可采用MDRD-4公式(Levey)。
{"title":"Comparison of two formulae for the calculation of glomerular filtration in the dosage of zoledronic acid","authors":"E. Ramírez Herráiz ,&nbsp;N. Garrido Peño ,&nbsp;R. Díez Fernández ,&nbsp;A.M. Iglesias Bolaños ,&nbsp;M. Arteta Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70065-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70065-6","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To validate the use of a formula that does not require the patient's weight (Levey formula) for calculating creatinine clearance in the adjustment of the dosage of zoledronic acid.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Prospective observational study in which zoledronic acid prescriptions in the Oncology and Haematology departments were recorded over the course of 8 months. The adjustment of the dose of zoledronic acid was carried out in accordance with creatinine clearance obtained using 2 different equations; the Cockcroft-Gault equation which is based on medical records, and the Levey formula which does not require the patient's weight for the calculation. The results of zoledronic acid dosage from both equations were compared using the SPSS statistics programme, via the comparison of the 2 measurements using the t Student-Fisher (t test).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The t test provided a t test value of t<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−3.366, with 112 degrees of freedom and a degree of bilateral importance of P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.001. The difference between both measurements was d<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.051[0.162]) and the confidence interval was 95%, −0.082 to −0.021. From the data obtained in the t test, the degree of bilateral importance (P=.001 &lt;.05) indicated that the results of the test were statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The difference between the dosages obtained when comparing both methods of glomerular filtration is statistically significant, although not clinically relevant, therefore the MDRD-4 formula (Levey) could be used if the patient's weight is not available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70065-6","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56619130","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1