首页 > 最新文献

Farming System最新文献

英文 中文
How do farmers value organic fertilisers? An exploratory study on conventional and innovative products 农民如何评价有机肥料的价值?传统产品与创新产品的探索性研究
Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100156
Marco Medici , Massimiliano Calvia , Nicolas Greggio , Alessandro Buscaroli , Diego Marazza , Maurizio Canavari
Current trends in the adoption of agricultural innovations aimed at replacing mineral fertilisers with organic fertilisers such as biochar and biochar-compost blends made from various organic wastes have recently been recognised as an important innovation to restore and improve soil fertility and mitigate environmental impacts while implementing the circular economy. A survey was designed to capture socio-economic characteristics and attitudes of farmers towards the use of organic fertilisers. Attitudinal data from 176 farmers were analysed using exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the components associated with their acceptance. Subsequently, the components and socio-economic data were used to delineate clusters of farmers that were matched with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a novel organic fertiliser, a biochar-compost blend. WTP was tasted using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation within the range of €1–300 per tonne. A positive WTP for BCmix was expressed by 63.1 % of farmers, with average preferred application rates exceeding 11 t/ha. Five main farmer clusters with different attitudes and appreciation levels for organic fertilisers were identified -The Neutral, The Unready, The Opposed, The Sceptic, and The Engaged-highlighting a range of attitudes and appreciation levels towards organic fertilisers. Interestingly, clusters with a neutral stance towards organic fertilisers showed significantly higher WTP than clusters more actively committed to sustainability, such as The Engaged, a finding that contrasts with prior studies where environmentally committed farmers typically show greater adoption willingness. The study's insights support targeted market segmentation and inform policy and communication strategies to promote the early adoption of organic fertilisers.
目前,采用有机肥料(如生物炭和由各种有机废物制成的生物炭-堆肥混合物)取代矿物肥料的农业创新趋势最近被认为是在实施循环经济的同时恢复和改善土壤肥力并减轻环境影响的重要创新。设计了一项调查,以了解社会经济特征和农民对使用有机肥料的态度。使用探索性主成分分析(PCA)对176名农民的态度数据进行分析,以确定与他们接受度相关的成分。随后,这些成分和社会经济数据被用来描述与新型有机肥料(生物炭-堆肥混合物)的支付意愿(WTP)相匹配的农民群体。WTP使用二分选择或有估值在每吨1-300欧元的范围内进行品尝。63.1%的农民表示BCmix的WTP呈阳性,平均首选施用量超过11吨/公顷。我们确定了五个对有机肥料持不同态度和欣赏水平的主要农民群体——中立者、未准备者、反对者、怀疑论者和参与者——突出了对有机肥料的一系列态度和欣赏水平。有趣的是,对有机肥料持中立态度的集群比积极致力于可持续发展的集群(如The Engaged)表现出明显更高的WTP,这一发现与之前的研究形成鲜明对比,即致力于环保的农民通常表现出更大的采用意愿。该研究的见解支持有针对性的市场细分,并为政策和传播战略提供信息,以促进有机肥料的早期采用。
{"title":"How do farmers value organic fertilisers? An exploratory study on conventional and innovative products","authors":"Marco Medici ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Calvia ,&nbsp;Nicolas Greggio ,&nbsp;Alessandro Buscaroli ,&nbsp;Diego Marazza ,&nbsp;Maurizio Canavari","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100156","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100156","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current trends in the adoption of agricultural innovations aimed at replacing mineral fertilisers with organic fertilisers such as biochar and biochar-compost blends made from various organic wastes have recently been recognised as an important innovation to restore and improve soil fertility and mitigate environmental impacts while implementing the circular economy. A survey was designed to capture socio-economic characteristics and attitudes of farmers towards the use of organic fertilisers. Attitudinal data from 176 farmers were analysed using exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the components associated with their acceptance. Subsequently, the components and socio-economic data were used to delineate clusters of farmers that were matched with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a novel organic fertiliser, a biochar-compost blend. WTP was tasted using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation within the range of €1–300 per tonne. A positive WTP for BCmix was expressed by 63.1 % of farmers, with average preferred application rates exceeding 11 t/ha. Five main farmer clusters with different attitudes and appreciation levels for organic fertilisers were identified -<em>The Neutral, The Unready, The Opposed, The Sceptic,</em> and <em>The Engaged</em>-highlighting a range of attitudes and appreciation levels towards organic fertilisers. Interestingly, clusters with a neutral stance towards organic fertilisers showed significantly higher WTP than clusters more actively committed to sustainability, such as <em>The Engaged</em>, a finding that contrasts with prior studies where environmentally committed farmers typically show greater adoption willingness. The study's insights support targeted market segmentation and inform policy and communication strategies to promote the early adoption of organic fertilisers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144296787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Management strategies to optimize peanut yields in Argentina under restrictive environmental conditions 在限制性环境条件下优化阿根廷花生产量的管理策略
Pub Date : 2025-05-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100155
Ricardo Javier Haro , Gustavo Ovando
Peanut production in Argentina is predominantly rainfed, with considerable variability in rainfall patterns within and between seasons. This variability results in droughts of varying duration and severity, which can significantly reduce yields. Water availability is, therefore, a critical factor in determining the optimal sowing date. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess the effects of sowing dates and water gradients on peanut yield and crop traits at two representative sites in the central peanut-producing region, and (ii) identify management strategies that optimize yield under water-limited conditions. Seasonal and annual analyses were conducted, incorporating water availability at sowing, environmental conditions, site characteristics, management practices, and cultivars. The Cropping System Model CROPGRO-Peanut was employed to simulate the impacts of those factors. Seasonal analysis revealed that delayed sowing dates consistently led to yield reductions, irrespective of water availability, with decreases in seed number, maximum leaf area index, total biomass, and water use efficiency. These yield reductions were more pronounced under lower water availability at sowing. When sown late, annual analysis indicated that combining an early cultivar and progressively narrowing row spacing resulted in increased yields. In contrast, intermediate-cycle and late cultivars experienced yield declines due to lower radiation and temperature levels. Differences in yield were also explained by the varying contributions of transpiration and evaporation to total water use. Our findings underscore the importance of management decisions in influencing water use components, with soil water-holding capacity playing a key role in crop performance. This study provides valuable insights for developing adapted management practices to improve productivity in temperate regions under water-limited conditions.
阿根廷的花生生产主要靠雨养,季节内和季节之间的降雨模式变化很大。这种可变性导致持续时间和严重程度各不相同的干旱,可显著降低产量。因此,水分供应是决定最佳播种日期的关键因素。本研究的目的是(i)评估播种日期和水分梯度对中部花生产区两个代表性地点花生产量和作物性状的影响,以及(ii)确定在水分限制条件下优化产量的管理策略。进行了季节和年度分析,包括播种时的水分有效性、环境条件、场地特征、管理措施和品种。采用作物种植系统模型CROPGRO-Peanut模拟这些因素的影响。季节分析显示,无论水分有效性如何,延迟播期都会导致产量下降,导致种子数量、最大叶面积指数、总生物量和水分利用效率下降。在播种时水分利用率较低的情况下,产量下降更为明显。在晚播时,年度分析表明,结合早期品种和逐渐缩小行距可提高产量。相反,由于辐射和温度水平较低,中后期品种的产量下降。蒸腾和蒸发对总用水量的不同贡献也解释了产量的差异。我们的研究结果强调了管理决策在影响水分利用成分方面的重要性,土壤持水能力在作物性能中起着关键作用。该研究为开发适应管理实践以提高温带地区水资源有限条件下的生产力提供了有价值的见解。
{"title":"Management strategies to optimize peanut yields in Argentina under restrictive environmental conditions","authors":"Ricardo Javier Haro ,&nbsp;Gustavo Ovando","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100155","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100155","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peanut production in Argentina is predominantly rainfed, with considerable variability in rainfall patterns within and between seasons. This variability results in droughts of varying duration and severity, which can significantly reduce yields. Water availability is, therefore, a critical factor in determining the optimal sowing date. The objectives of this study were to <em>(i)</em> assess the effects of sowing dates and water gradients on peanut yield and crop traits at two representative sites in the central peanut-producing region, and <em>(ii)</em> identify management strategies that optimize yield under water-limited conditions. Seasonal and annual analyses were conducted, incorporating water availability at sowing, environmental conditions, site characteristics, management practices, and cultivars. The Cropping System Model CROPGRO-Peanut was employed to simulate the impacts of those factors. Seasonal analysis revealed that delayed sowing dates consistently led to yield reductions, irrespective of water availability, with decreases in seed number, maximum leaf area index, total biomass, and water use efficiency. These yield reductions were more pronounced under lower water availability at sowing. When sown late, annual analysis indicated that combining an early cultivar and progressively narrowing row spacing resulted in increased yields. In contrast, intermediate-cycle and late cultivars experienced yield declines due to lower radiation and temperature levels. Differences in yield were also explained by the varying contributions of transpiration and evaporation to total water use. Our findings underscore the importance of management decisions in influencing water use components, with soil water-holding capacity playing a key role in crop performance. This study provides valuable insights for developing adapted management practices to improve productivity in temperate regions under water-limited conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144196160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing agroecological transitions: From locally-adapted protocols to a global transdisciplinary applied approach 加强农业生态转型:从地方适应协议到全球跨学科应用方法
Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100154
Blas Lavandero , Mauricio González-Chang , Roberto Jara-Rojas , Ismael Gallardo , Kris Wyckhuys
The adoption of biodiversity-based approaches to farming that promotes ecosystem services may fail when knowledge is not locally developed or adapted. Economic, social, logistical, or human-related constrains may arise as well at any stage, influencing different groups of adopters. On the other hand, adoption success is traditionally analyzed as a binary dependent variable. Success should be defined by incorporating insights from adoption of technology knowledge (i.e., “adoption pathways”). Indeed, there will be more than one way to reduce the adoption gap of certain technologies, as farmers are culturally different and therefore, differential and tailored strategies will be necessary to increase overall adoption. We here propose that a more tailored approach that considers the spatial and temporal variability in farmers’ intentions and perceptions to generate, adapt and adopt new technologies is needed. To make this happen we are proposing four necessary steps: 1) Evidence-Based and Experience-Based Knowledge; 2) Standardization of Decision-Relevant Metrics; 3) Communicating Knowledge to Bold Farmers (Early Adopters) and 4) Encourage Horizontal Participatory Knowledge Exchange and Co-Creation.
如果没有在当地开发或调整知识,采用基于生物多样性的农业方法促进生态系统服务可能会失败。在任何阶段也可能出现经济、社会、后勤或与人有关的限制,影响不同的收养群体。另一方面,采用成功传统上被分析为二元因变量。成功应该通过结合技术知识采用的见解来定义(即,“采用途径”)。事实上,减少某些技术采用差距的方法不止一种,因为农民在文化上是不同的,因此,有必要采取差异化和量身定制的战略来提高总体采用。我们在此提出,需要一种更有针对性的方法,考虑农民产生、适应和采用新技术的意图和观念的时空变化。为实现这一目标,我们提出了四个必要步骤:1)基于证据和经验的知识;2)决策相关指标标准化;3)向大胆的农民(早期采用者)传播知识;4)鼓励横向参与式知识交流和共同创造。
{"title":"Enhancing agroecological transitions: From locally-adapted protocols to a global transdisciplinary applied approach","authors":"Blas Lavandero ,&nbsp;Mauricio González-Chang ,&nbsp;Roberto Jara-Rojas ,&nbsp;Ismael Gallardo ,&nbsp;Kris Wyckhuys","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100154","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100154","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adoption of biodiversity-based approaches to farming that promotes ecosystem services may fail when knowledge is not locally developed or adapted. Economic, social, logistical, or human-related constrains may arise as well at any stage, influencing different groups of adopters. On the other hand, adoption success is traditionally analyzed as a binary dependent variable. Success should be defined by incorporating insights from adoption of technology knowledge (i.e., “adoption pathways”). Indeed, there will be more than one way to reduce the adoption gap of certain technologies, as farmers are culturally different and therefore, differential and tailored strategies will be necessary to increase overall adoption. We here propose that a more tailored approach that considers the spatial and temporal variability in farmers’ intentions and perceptions to generate, adapt and adopt new technologies is needed. To make this happen we are proposing four necessary steps: 1) Evidence-Based and Experience-Based Knowledge; 2) Standardization of Decision-Relevant Metrics; 3) Communicating Knowledge to Bold Farmers (Early Adopters) and 4) Encourage Horizontal Participatory Knowledge Exchange and Co-Creation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144099350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Climate variability and future responses of agricultural systems in Mediterranean region 气候变率与地中海地区农业系统的未来响应
Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100153
Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen , Salvatore Gonario Pasquale Virdis
Challenges in developing climate adaptation strategies arise from the uncertainty and fragmentation of climate change knowledge, as well as the involvement of many actors with varying values and interests. This study, using a system perspective approach, conducted through a case study in Sardinia, Italy—a prominent Mediterranean region—focused on four agricultural systems: (1) intensive dairy cattle, (2) extensive dairy sheep, (3) horticulture, and (4) rice. The aim was to examine past, present, and future climate changes, the evolution of these agricultural systems, climate impacts, and response behaviors. The findings reveal the annual mean daily maximum (TXmCF ​= ​+0.13 ​°C/decade and TXmSL ​= ​+0.27 ​°C/decade) and are expected to continue rising both intermediate (TNm45=+1.60°C) and business-as-usual scenarios (TNm85=+2.43°C) with a rate of +0.17°C/decade and +0.26°C/decade respectively, along with the frequency of hot days and heatwaves. The four agricultural systems have evolved differently in response to socio-environmental changes. Farmers perceived climate variability and its impacts on their systems in varied ways, leading to different responses to future climate. Intensive farming systems were found to have more future adaptation perspectives to climate variability than traditional extensive systems, due to differences in socio-cultural and technological contexts. This highlights the need to strengthen farmers' adaptive capacities in managing traditional systems, along with their biodiversity and cultural knowledge, to help preserve globally significant agricultural heritage. The research also revealed the importance of collective adaptation responses at multiple levels that could be translated into policies and practices to enhance adaptive capacities of agricultural systems.
制定气候适应战略的挑战来自气候变化知识的不确定性和碎片化,以及具有不同价值观和利益的许多行动者的参与。本研究采用系统视角方法,通过对意大利撒丁岛(一个著名的地中海地区)的案例研究进行了研究,重点研究了四个农业系统:(1)集约型奶牛,(2)粗放型奶羊,(3)园艺,(4)水稻。目的是研究过去、现在和未来的气候变化、这些农业系统的演变、气候影响和响应行为。研究结果显示,年平均日最大值(TXmCF =+ 0.13°C/ 10年,TXmSL =+ 0.27°C/ 10年),预计在中等(TNm45=+1.60°C)和正常情况下(TNm85=+2.43°C)将继续上升,分别为+0.17°C/ 10年和+0.26°C/ 10年,同时炎热天气和热浪的频率也会增加。这四种农业系统因社会环境变化而发生了不同的演变。农民以不同的方式感知气候变率及其对其系统的影响,从而导致对未来气候的不同反应。由于社会文化和技术背景的差异,发现集约化耕作系统比传统粗放式耕作系统对气候变率具有更多的未来适应前景。这突出表明,需要加强农民在管理传统系统及其生物多样性和文化知识方面的适应能力,以帮助保护具有全球重要意义的农业遗产。该研究还揭示了在多个层面采取集体适应措施的重要性,这些措施可以转化为提高农业系统适应能力的政策和实践。
{"title":"Climate variability and future responses of agricultural systems in Mediterranean region","authors":"Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen ,&nbsp;Salvatore Gonario Pasquale Virdis","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100153","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100153","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Challenges in developing climate adaptation strategies arise from the uncertainty and fragmentation of climate change knowledge, as well as the involvement of many actors with varying values and interests. This study, using a system perspective approach, conducted through a case study in Sardinia, Italy—a prominent Mediterranean region—focused on four agricultural systems: (1) intensive dairy cattle, (2) extensive dairy sheep, (3) horticulture, and (4) rice. The aim was to examine past, present, and future climate changes, the evolution of these agricultural systems, climate impacts, and response behaviors. The findings reveal the annual mean daily maximum (TXm<sub>CF</sub> ​= ​+0.13 ​°C/decade and TXm<sub>SL</sub> ​= ​+0.27 ​°C/decade) and are expected to continue rising both intermediate <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>N</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>45</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mo>+</mo><mn>1.60</mn><mo>°</mo><mi>C</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> and business-as-usual scenarios <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>N</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>85</mn></msub><mo>=</mo><mo>+</mo><mn>2.43</mn><mo>°</mo><mi>C</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> with a rate of <span><math><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>0.17</mn><mo>°</mo><mi>C</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>c</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>d</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>0.26</mn><mo>°</mo><mi>C</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>d</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>c</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>d</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></math></span> respectively, along with the frequency of hot days and heatwaves. The four agricultural systems have evolved differently in response to socio-environmental changes. Farmers perceived climate variability and its impacts on their systems in varied ways, leading to different responses to future climate. Intensive farming systems were found to have more future adaptation perspectives to climate variability than traditional extensive systems, due to differences in socio-cultural and technological contexts. This highlights the need to strengthen farmers' adaptive capacities in managing traditional systems, along with their biodiversity and cultural knowledge, to help preserve globally significant agricultural heritage. The research also revealed the importance of collective adaptation responses at multiple levels that could be translated into policies and practices to enhance adaptive capacities of agricultural systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143887184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of planting dates and seeding densities on soil water depletion pattern, root distribution, and water productivity of industrial hemp 播期和密度对工业大麻土壤耗水格局、根系分布和水分生产力的影响
Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100152
Preetaman Bajwa , Sukhbir Singh , Arjun Kafle , Manpreet Singh , Rupinder Saini , Calvin Trostle
Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) has the potential to thrive in water-limited regions due to its deep roots and drought tolerance. However, little is known about hemp root dynamics and water productivity in the semi-arid West Texas. Therefore, this study investigates the impact of planting dates (P1- April 19th, P2- May 10th, and P3- June 6th) and seeding densities (SD1- 85, SD2- 1408, and SD3- 1972 thousand seeds ha−1) on root growth, soil water depletion and water productivity of industrial hemp. The experiment was randomized in a blocked split-plot design. In 2023, P2 exhibited higher root length density, particularly fine roots compared to other planting dates. P2 also recorded the greatest soil water depletion during both years. Seeding densities showed comparable soil water depletion in 2022, but in 2023, SD2 depleted more water than SD1, while SD3 exhibited no significant differences in water depletion. P3 produced the lowest plant biomass, bast, and hurd fiber yields and their water productivity in both years. However, P3 demonstrated higher grain yield and grain water productivity in 2022, while P2 showed greater grain production in 2023, showing no significant difference in grain water productivity across plantings. Over both years, SD1 had the lowest production and water productivity for most of the yield parameters. In conclusion, May planting at higher seeding densities can enhance water productivity in West Texas conditions.
工业大麻(大麻sativa L.)有潜力在缺水地区茁壮成长,由于其深根和耐旱性。然而,在半干旱的西德克萨斯州,人们对大麻根系动态和水分生产力知之甚少。因此,本研究考察了种植日期(P1 ~ 4月19日、P2 ~ 5月10日和P3 ~ 6月6日)和播种密度(SD1 ~ 85、SD2 ~ 1408和SD3 ~ 1972千粒ha−1)对工业大麻根系生长、土壤水分耗竭和水分生产力的影响。实验采用分块分割图随机设计。2023年P2的根长密度高于其他年份,尤其是细根密度。在这两年中,P2也记录了最大的土壤水分枯竭。播种密度在2022年的土壤耗水量相当,但在2023年,SD2耗水量大于SD1,而SD3的耗水量差异不显著。P3年份的植物生物量、韧皮和牧草纤维产量及其水分生产力最低。P3在2022年表现出更高的粮食产量和粮食水分生产力,P2在2023年表现出更高的粮食产量,不同种植间的粮食水分生产力差异不显著。在这两年中,SD1在大多数产量参数上的产量和水分生产力最低。综上所述,在西德克萨斯条件下,5月以较高的播种密度种植可以提高水分生产力。
{"title":"Impact of planting dates and seeding densities on soil water depletion pattern, root distribution, and water productivity of industrial hemp","authors":"Preetaman Bajwa ,&nbsp;Sukhbir Singh ,&nbsp;Arjun Kafle ,&nbsp;Manpreet Singh ,&nbsp;Rupinder Saini ,&nbsp;Calvin Trostle","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100152","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100152","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Industrial hemp (<em>Cannabis sativa</em> L.) has the potential to thrive in water-limited regions due to its deep roots and drought tolerance. However, little is known about hemp root dynamics and water productivity in the semi-arid West Texas. Therefore, this study investigates the impact of planting dates (P1- April 19th, P2- May 10th, and P3- June 6th) and seeding densities (SD1- 85, SD2- 1408, and SD3- 1972 thousand seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>) on root growth, soil water depletion and water productivity of industrial hemp. The experiment was randomized in a blocked split-plot design. In 2023, P2 exhibited higher root length density, particularly fine roots compared to other planting dates. P2 also recorded the greatest soil water depletion during both years. Seeding densities showed comparable soil water depletion in 2022, but in 2023, SD2 depleted more water than SD1, while SD3 exhibited no significant differences in water depletion. P3 produced the lowest plant biomass, bast, and hurd fiber yields and their water productivity in both years. However, P3 demonstrated higher grain yield and grain water productivity in 2022, while P2 showed greater grain production in 2023, showing no significant difference in grain water productivity across plantings. Over both years, SD1 had the lowest production and water productivity for most of the yield parameters. In conclusion, May planting at higher seeding densities can enhance water productivity in West Texas conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143821453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conservation agriculture for closing maize yield gap and enhancing climate resilience in semi-arid Eastern Rwanda 在半干旱的卢旺达东部开展保护性农业,缩小玉米产量差距,增强气候适应能力
Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100151
Petronille Dusingizimana , Krishna Prasad Devkota , Mamadou Cherif , Athanase Nduwumuremyi
In Rwanda, maize is a crucial staple crop, serving as a primary food source for both smallholder and commercial farmers. However, national maize yields (1.52 ​t ​ha−1) remain significantly lower than the global (5.88 ​t ​ha−1) and African (2.27 ​t ​ha−1) averages, posing a challenge to food security and economic growth. Key constraints include limited input use, suboptimal agronomic practices, and climate change. Conservation Agriculture (CA) has been promoted as a climate-smart approach to enhance productivity and sustainability in Rwanda. This study evaluates the agronomic and economic performance of CA compared to conventional tillage (CT) using survey data from 222 farms in the Kirehe district. Results show that CA farmers incurred higher total production costs (p ​< ​0.001), particularly for fertilizers, seeds, weeding, and irrigation, while CT farmers had significantly higher land preparation costs (p ​< ​0.001). Despite these cost differences, CA farmers achieved 40 ​% higher net profitability, 20 ​% higher maize yields, and 10 ​% greater phosphorus use efficiency than CT farmers. A Random Forest model identified experience in CA, irrigation frequency, seed rate, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application as key determinants of maize yield, with variations between CA and CT systems. Overall, CA significantly improved maize productivity and profitability despite higher initial costs, highlighting its potential as a sustainable intensification strategy for maize production in Rwanda and similar agro-climatic regions in East Africa.
在卢旺达,玉米是一种重要的主粮作物,是小农和商业农民的主要食物来源。然而,国家玉米产量(1.52 t hm2)仍显著低于全球(5.88 t hm2)和非洲(2.27 t hm2)的平均水平,对粮食安全和经济增长构成挑战。主要制约因素包括有限的投入物使用、次优农艺做法和气候变化。保护农业(CA)作为一种气候智能型方法在卢旺达得到推广,以提高生产力和可持续性。本研究利用Kirehe地区222个农场的调查数据,评估了CA与传统耕作(CT)相比的农艺和经济效益。结果表明,CA农户的总生产成本较高(p <;0.001),特别是在化肥、种子、除草和灌溉方面,而CT农民的土地准备成本明显更高(p <;0.001)。尽管存在这些成本差异,但与CT农民相比,CA农民的净盈利能力提高了40%,玉米产量提高了20%,磷利用效率提高了10%。随机森林模型确定了CA、灌溉频率、播种率和氮磷肥施用是玉米产量的关键决定因素,并且CA和CT系统之间存在差异。总体而言,尽管初始成本较高,但CA显著提高了玉米生产力和盈利能力,突出了其作为卢旺达和东非类似农业气候地区玉米生产可持续集约化战略的潜力。
{"title":"Conservation agriculture for closing maize yield gap and enhancing climate resilience in semi-arid Eastern Rwanda","authors":"Petronille Dusingizimana ,&nbsp;Krishna Prasad Devkota ,&nbsp;Mamadou Cherif ,&nbsp;Athanase Nduwumuremyi","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100151","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100151","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Rwanda, maize is a crucial staple crop, serving as a primary food source for both smallholder and commercial farmers. However, national maize yields (1.52 ​t ​ha<sup>−1</sup>) remain significantly lower than the global (5.88 ​t ​ha<sup>−1</sup>) and African (2.27 ​t ​ha<sup>−1</sup>) averages, posing a challenge to food security and economic growth. Key constraints include limited input use, suboptimal agronomic practices, and climate change. Conservation Agriculture (CA) has been promoted as a climate-smart approach to enhance productivity and sustainability in Rwanda. This study evaluates the agronomic and economic performance of CA compared to conventional tillage (CT) using survey data from 222 farms in the Kirehe district. Results show that CA farmers incurred higher total production costs (p ​&lt; ​0.001), particularly for fertilizers, seeds, weeding, and irrigation, while CT farmers had significantly higher land preparation costs (p ​&lt; ​0.001). Despite these cost differences, CA farmers achieved 40 ​% higher net profitability, 20 ​% higher maize yields, and 10 ​% greater phosphorus use efficiency than CT farmers. A Random Forest model identified experience in CA, irrigation frequency, seed rate, and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application as key determinants of maize yield, with variations between CA and CT systems. Overall, CA significantly improved maize productivity and profitability despite higher initial costs, highlighting its potential as a sustainable intensification strategy for maize production in Rwanda and similar agro-climatic regions in East Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143816001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Urban agriculture: A strategic pathway to building resilience and ensuring sustainable food security in cities 都市农业:建设城市抵御力和确保可持续粮食安全的战略途径
Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100150
Ruwanthika Gunapala , Ruchira Gangahagedara , W.C.S. Wanasinghe , Anjalika U. Samaraweera , Ashoka Gamage , Chamila Rathnayaka , Zammil Hameed , Zaher Abdel Baki , Terrence Madhujith , Othmane Merah
Urban agriculture is gaining global recognition as a strategic approach to promising creating sustainable and reliable food sources, enhancing food security and resilience in cities. By shortening the food supply chain, urban agriculture reduces the reliance on pesticides and fertilizers, while also conserving water and mitigating land degradation. Despite these benefits, further research and collaborative efforts are needed to integrate the advanced technological practices and improve overall sustainability. Urban agriculture offers exciting opportunities for the horticultural and agricultural sectors, especially when it focuses on maximizing product quality. This approach merges technology, architecture, and farming within vertical structures, highlighting the synergy between urban living and the natural environment. Urban Agriculture is versatile, serving both productive and aesthetic purposes in various forms. To achieve sustainability in urban settings, urban agriculture offers a proactive alternative to traditional agriculture. Its success varies depending on the extent of its implementation at either the building or city level. Urban agriculture can play a critical role in addressing food deserts by increasing access to fresh produce, empowering communities, and reducing transportation costs. Urban agriculture positively impacts the urban landscape by enhancing aesthetics, promoting well-being, and fostering a sense of community engagement, supporting biodiversity, minimizing heat buildup in urban areas and contributing to climate resilience. Overall, urban agriculture represents a promising alternative to conventional agriculture and has the potential to make cities more livable and resilient. Regulatory challenges, social acceptance of waste, high investment costs, and limited recognition of indirect impacts are some of the challenges that come with implementing urban agriculture. The recommendations highlighted the importance of local governance and public policies in promoting circular urban agriculture. Promoting collaboration, fostering innovation, developing regulatory frameworks, and displaying successful urban agriculture practices are all possibilities. This review aims to present an overview of urban agriculture as a strategic pathway to building resilience and ensuring sustainable food security in cities.
城市农业作为一种有希望创造可持续和可靠的粮食来源、加强城市粮食安全和抵御力的战略方法,正在获得全球的认可。通过缩短粮食供应链,城市农业减少了对农药和化肥的依赖,同时还节约用水和缓解土地退化。尽管有这些好处,但需要进一步的研究和合作努力来整合先进的技术实践并提高整体可持续性。都市农业为园艺和农业部门提供了令人兴奋的机会,特别是当它专注于最大限度地提高产品质量时。这种方法在垂直结构中融合了技术、建筑和农业,突出了城市生活与自然环境之间的协同作用。都市农业是多功能的,以各种形式服务于生产和审美目的。为了在城市环境中实现可持续性,城市农业为传统农业提供了一种积极的替代方案。它的成功取决于它在建筑或城市层面的实施程度。城市农业可以通过增加获得新鲜农产品的机会、增强社区权能和降低运输成本,在解决粮食沙漠问题方面发挥关键作用。城市农业通过增强美学、促进福祉、培养社区参与意识、支持生物多样性、最大限度地减少城市地区的热量积累和促进气候适应能力,对城市景观产生积极影响。总体而言,城市农业是传统农业的一个有希望的替代方案,有可能使城市更宜居和更有弹性。监管挑战、社会对废物的接受程度、高昂的投资成本以及对间接影响的认识有限,是实施都市农业所面临的一些挑战。这些建议强调了地方治理和公共政策在促进城市循环农业方面的重要性。促进合作、促进创新、制定监管框架以及展示成功的都市农业实践都是可能的。本综述旨在概述城市农业作为建设抵御力和确保城市可持续粮食安全的战略途径。
{"title":"Urban agriculture: A strategic pathway to building resilience and ensuring sustainable food security in cities","authors":"Ruwanthika Gunapala ,&nbsp;Ruchira Gangahagedara ,&nbsp;W.C.S. Wanasinghe ,&nbsp;Anjalika U. Samaraweera ,&nbsp;Ashoka Gamage ,&nbsp;Chamila Rathnayaka ,&nbsp;Zammil Hameed ,&nbsp;Zaher Abdel Baki ,&nbsp;Terrence Madhujith ,&nbsp;Othmane Merah","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100150","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100150","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban agriculture is gaining global recognition as a strategic approach to promising creating sustainable and reliable food sources, enhancing food security and resilience in cities. By shortening the food supply chain, urban agriculture reduces the reliance on pesticides and fertilizers, while also conserving water and mitigating land degradation. Despite these benefits, further research and collaborative efforts are needed to integrate the advanced technological practices and improve overall sustainability. Urban agriculture offers exciting opportunities for the horticultural and agricultural sectors, especially when it focuses on maximizing product quality. This approach merges technology, architecture, and farming within vertical structures, highlighting the synergy between urban living and the natural environment. Urban Agriculture is versatile, serving both productive and aesthetic purposes in various forms. To achieve sustainability in urban settings, urban agriculture offers a proactive alternative to traditional agriculture. Its success varies depending on the extent of its implementation at either the building or city level. Urban agriculture can play a critical role in addressing food deserts by increasing access to fresh produce, empowering communities, and reducing transportation costs. <span>Urban</span> agriculture positively impacts the urban landscape by enhancing aesthetics, promoting well-being, and fostering a sense of community engagement, supporting biodiversity, minimizing heat buildup in urban areas and contributing to climate resilience. Overall, urban agriculture represents a promising alternative to conventional agriculture and has the potential to make cities more livable and resilient. Regulatory challenges, social acceptance of waste, high investment costs, and limited recognition of indirect impacts are some of the challenges that come with implementing urban agriculture. The recommendations highlighted the importance of local governance and public policies in promoting circular urban agriculture. Promoting collaboration, fostering innovation, developing regulatory frameworks, and displaying successful urban agriculture practices are all possibilities. This review aims to present an overview of urban agriculture as a strategic pathway to building resilience and ensuring sustainable food security in cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143792820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new fibre microfluidic soil pore water sampling device for NH4+-N sensing using ion-selective electrode sensors (ISEs) 基于离子选择电极传感器(ISEs)的新型纤维微流控土壤孔隙水采样装置
Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100142
Yafei Guo , Ernesto Saiz , Aleksandar Radu , Sameer Sonkusale , Sami Ullah
Several climate change scenarios predict extreme precipitation and irrigation, leading to saturated soil conditions. In this paper, we present a new fibre microfluidic device coupled to ion-selective electrode sensors (ISEs) to sense soil ammonium-nitrogen (NH4+-N) under these saturated soil conditions. The strength of fibre microfluidics in ISE sensors lies in its ability to integrate electrochemical sensing with microfluidic fluid control in a flexible, miniaturized format. This technology enables miniaturization, flexibility, integrated microfluidic control for enhanced ionic selectivity, improved stability and longevity, as well as scalable and cost-effective manufacturing. The ISEs were applied to monitor NH4+-N concentrations in soil pore water, which were drawn by the deployed fibre. The water wicked by the microfluidic fibre passed through an array of NH4+-N ISE ionophores for real-time sensing over six days. The water was also collected for laboratory analysis of NH4+-N through colourimetry to assess the ISE sensing performance. Our results indicate that the calibration slopes of the fibre microfluidic ISEs, ranging from 45.80 to 60.40 ​mV per decade, are generally acceptable, as the theoretical slope ideally stands at 59 ​mV per order of magnitude. Our sensor can be used to for real-time monitoring of soil NH4+-N levels in fertilized grassland and arable soils over four to six days after installation. The fibre microfluidic ISE overestimated soil NH4+-N concentrations, with deviations ranging from −61% to 248% in grassland soil and −80%–370% in arable soil. This significant range of deviation may be attributed to soil particles wicked by the microfluidic fibre, which subsequently adhered to the sensor membrane. The ISE readings were compared with the soil pore water NH4+-N concentrations determined by colourimetry and the measured values were found to be within similar concentration ranges; however, there was high variability between ISE results and the directly measured soil pore water. Whilst real time responses are more variable, it nevertheless points to the highly dynamic nature of soil nitrogen cycling. Therefore, the technology has the potential for further miniaturization and fine tuning to assist optimizing soil fertilizer use for crop production while preventing environmental pollution through the avoidance of excessive fertilizer application.
一些气候变化情景预测极端降水和灌溉将导致土壤饱和。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的纤维微流控装置耦合离子选择电极传感器(ISEs)来检测这些饱和土壤条件下的土壤铵氮(NH4+-N)。纤维微流体在ISE传感器中的优势在于它能够以灵活、小型化的形式将电化学传感与微流体控制相结合。该技术实现了小型化,灵活性,集成微流体控制,以增强离子选择性,提高稳定性和寿命,以及可扩展和具有成本效益的制造。利用ISEs对展开纤维吸附的土壤孔隙水中NH4+-N浓度进行监测。在六天的时间里,微流控纤维捕获的水通过一系列NH4+- nise离子载体进行实时传感。还收集了水,通过比色法进行实验室NH4+-N分析,以评估ISE的传感性能。我们的结果表明,光纤微流体ISEs的校准斜率在每十年45.80到60.40 mV之间,通常是可以接受的,因为理想的理论斜率为每数量级59 mV。我们的传感器可以在安装后的4到6天内用于实时监测施肥草地和耕地土壤的土壤NH4+-N水平。纤维微流控ISE高估了土壤NH4+-N浓度,草地土壤偏差为- 61% ~ 248%,耕地土壤偏差为- 80% ~ 370%。这种显著的偏差范围可能归因于被微流控纤维腐蚀的土壤颗粒,它们随后粘附在传感器膜上。将ISE读数与比色法测定的土壤孔隙水NH4+-N浓度进行比较,发现测量值在相似的浓度范围内;然而,ISE结果与直接测量的土壤孔隙水之间存在很大差异。虽然实时响应的变化更大,但它仍然指出了土壤氮循环的高度动态性质。因此,该技术具有进一步小型化和微调的潜力,有助于优化作物生产的土壤肥料使用,同时通过避免过度施肥来防止环境污染。
{"title":"A new fibre microfluidic soil pore water sampling device for NH4+-N sensing using ion-selective electrode sensors (ISEs)","authors":"Yafei Guo ,&nbsp;Ernesto Saiz ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Radu ,&nbsp;Sameer Sonkusale ,&nbsp;Sami Ullah","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several climate change scenarios predict extreme precipitation and irrigation, leading to saturated soil conditions. In this paper, we present a new fibre microfluidic device coupled to ion-selective electrode sensors (ISEs) to sense soil ammonium-nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N) under these saturated soil conditions. The strength of fibre microfluidics in ISE sensors lies in its ability to integrate electrochemical sensing with microfluidic fluid control in a flexible, miniaturized format. This technology enables miniaturization, flexibility, integrated microfluidic control for enhanced ionic selectivity, improved stability and longevity, as well as scalable and cost-effective manufacturing. The ISEs were applied to monitor NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N concentrations in soil pore water, which were drawn by the deployed fibre. The water wicked by the microfluidic fibre passed through an array of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N ISE ionophores for real-time sensing over six days. The water was also collected for laboratory analysis of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N through colourimetry to assess the ISE sensing performance. Our results indicate that the calibration slopes of the fibre microfluidic ISEs, ranging from 45.80 to 60.40 ​mV per decade, are generally acceptable, as the theoretical slope ideally stands at 59 ​mV per order of magnitude. Our sensor can be used to for real-time monitoring of soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N levels in fertilized grassland and arable soils over four to six days after installation. The fibre microfluidic ISE overestimated soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N concentrations, with deviations ranging from −61% to 248% in grassland soil and −80%–370% in arable soil. This significant range of deviation may be attributed to soil particles wicked by the microfluidic fibre, which subsequently adhered to the sensor membrane. The ISE readings were compared with the soil pore water NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N concentrations determined by colourimetry and the measured values were found to be within similar concentration ranges; however, there was high variability between ISE results and the directly measured soil pore water. Whilst real time responses are more variable, it nevertheless points to the highly dynamic nature of soil nitrogen cycling. Therefore, the technology has the potential for further miniaturization and fine tuning to assist optimizing soil fertilizer use for crop production while preventing environmental pollution through the avoidance of excessive fertilizer application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143529205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling 利用模型评估生物基氮肥在欧洲种植系统中的性能
Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100141
Muhammad Adil Rashid , Yun-Feng Duan , Jan Peter Lesschen , Piet Groenendijk , Sander Bruun , Lars Stoumann Jensen
Biobased fertilizers (BBFs) are gaining attention for their potential to advance a circular economy. This study used the Daisy model to evaluate the performance of three BBFs—ammonium sulphate (AS), digestate (DIG), and liquid fraction of digestate (LFDIG)—compared to baseline fertilization (mineral and manure) across ten European cropping systems. BBFs replaced baseline fertilization under three scenarios: (i) full replacement with equivalent total N input, (ii) full replacement with higher total N input due to BBFs' lower (<100%) fertilizer replacement values (FRVs, relative substitution rate of BBF to synthetic fertilizer), and (iii) partial replacement (only manure-N) with equivalent total N input. Results indicated that under both partial and full replacement scenarios with equivalent total N input, AS, DIG, and LFDIG had minimal impacts (<5%) on crop N yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and total N losses (gaseous and leaching) compared to the baseline. The soil organic N (SON) stocks either decreased or changed more slowly with AS and LFDIG. In scenario ii (higher total N input), BBFs led to increased N yield (2–18%) and N losses (avg. 76%), and decreased NUE (2–25%) relative to the baseline. DIG was the most effective at improving SON stocks (average increase 4.9 ​kg ​N ha−1y−1) and reducing N losses, followed by LFDIG and AS. The impact on N leaching varied, with higher leaching observed in annual cereal-based compared to semi-perennial grass-based systems. Implications are that BBFs should be applied assuming a high FRV (∼100%), ensuring equivalent total N input when replacing baseline fertilization to prevent increasing N losses.
生物基肥料(BBFs)因其推进循环经济的潜力而备受关注。本研究使用 Daisy 模型评估了三种生物基肥(硫酸铵 (AS)、沼渣 (DIG) 和沼渣液态部分 (LFDIG))与基准施肥(矿物肥料和粪肥)在十个欧洲种植系统中的性能比较。在三种情况下,BBFs 取代了基准施肥:(i) 完全替代,总氮肥输入量相等;(ii) 完全替代,总氮肥输入量较高,因为 BBFs 的肥料替代值(FRVs,BBF 对合成肥料的相对替代率)较低(<100%);(iii) 部分替代(仅粪肥-氮),总氮肥输入量相等。结果表明,与基线相比,在部分替代和完全替代且总氮输入量相等的情况下,AS、DIG 和 LFDIG 对作物氮产量、氮利用效率(NUE)和总氮损失(气态和淋失)的影响极小(<5%)。土壤有机氮(SON)储量在 AS 和 LFDIG 的作用下要么减少,要么变化较慢。在情景 ii 中(总氮输入量增加),与基线相比,BBFs 增加了氮产量(2-18%)和氮损失量(平均 76%),降低了氮利用效率(2-25%)。DIG 在提高 SON 储量(平均每公顷每年增加 4.9 千克 N)和减少 N 损失方面最为有效,其次是 LFDIG 和 AS。对氮沥滤的影响各不相同,与半多年生草地系统相比,一年生谷物系统的氮沥滤更高。这意味着,在施用 BBF 时应假定较高的 FRV 值(∼100%),确保在替代基肥时氮的总输入量相等,以防止增加氮的损失。
{"title":"Evaluating the performance of biobased, recovered nitrogen fertilizers in European cropping systems using modelling","authors":"Muhammad Adil Rashid ,&nbsp;Yun-Feng Duan ,&nbsp;Jan Peter Lesschen ,&nbsp;Piet Groenendijk ,&nbsp;Sander Bruun ,&nbsp;Lars Stoumann Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100141","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100141","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biobased fertilizers (BBFs) are gaining attention for their potential to advance a circular economy. This study used the Daisy model to evaluate the performance of three BBFs—ammonium sulphate (AS), digestate (DIG), and liquid fraction of digestate (LFDIG)—compared to baseline fertilization (mineral and manure) across ten European cropping systems. BBFs replaced baseline fertilization under three scenarios: (i) full replacement with equivalent total N input, (ii) full replacement with higher total N input due to BBFs' lower (&lt;100%) fertilizer replacement values (FRVs, relative substitution rate of BBF to synthetic fertilizer), and (iii) partial replacement (only manure-N) with equivalent total N input. Results indicated that under both partial and full replacement scenarios with equivalent total N input, AS, DIG, and LFDIG had minimal impacts (&lt;5%) on crop N yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and total N losses (gaseous and leaching) compared to the baseline. The soil organic N (SON) stocks either decreased or changed more slowly with AS and LFDIG. In scenario ii (higher total N input), BBFs led to increased N yield (2–18%) and N losses (avg. 76%), and decreased NUE (2–25%) relative to the baseline. DIG was the most effective at improving SON stocks (average increase 4.9 ​kg ​N ha<sup>−1</sup>y<sup>−1</sup>) and reducing N losses, followed by LFDIG and AS. The impact on N leaching varied, with higher leaching observed in annual cereal-based compared to semi-perennial grass-based systems. Implications are that BBFs should be applied assuming a high FRV (∼100%), ensuring equivalent total N input when replacing baseline fertilization to prevent increasing N losses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143465551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia 对柬埔寨西北部农民最近实施的保护性农业种植制度进行多标准评估
Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100140
Sambo Pheap , Alexis Thoumazeau , Jun Murase , Vang Seng , Jean-Pierre Sarthou , Veng Sar , Linda Kimbo , Soklin Kheam , Pheakdey Chan , Pao Srean , Samrith Leang , Lyda Hok , Florent Tivet
Soil fertility depletion is a major challenge for annual rainfed cropping systems in the northwestern region of Cambodia which has recently undergone rapid agrarian changes. On-farm impacts of conventional tillage and Conservation Agriculture-based practices (CT and CA respectively) of maize cultivation on soil health along with agronomic and economic performances were compared. The experiment was set up in 2020 comparing CT and CA with one cover crop (CAS) and CA with a mix of three cover crops (CAM). Soil health was assessed at the end of the cropping cycle using Biofunctool®. Agronomic performances including cover crops and a cash crop (maize) along with intermediate consumption were recorded in 2021 and 2022. Selected components of soil health, agronomic and economic performances were used for multi-criteria analysis. On this Mollisols, SHI was positively impacted under CA (15% and 6% higher in 2021 and 2022), but with some soil parameters varied from one year to the next. In 2021, lower plant density (p ​< ​0.05) was recorded under CA, highlighting the need to improve the efficiency of no-till sowing methods. Intermediate consumption was not significant between the treatments for both years. Non-significant difference in yields was recorded under the three treatments in both years, but while both CA systems remained stable, CT dropped by 10% in 2022 with some differences for yield components with a larger number of grains per column and higher mass of grains under CAS. Gross value added under CA was 12.7% less than CT in 2021, it surpassed CT by 43% in 2022. Agronomic and economic performances were still unstable at this early stage of implementation with wide variability across the two cropping seasons emphasizing that with this soil type, CA induced a significant increase in soil health but did not yet lead to significant increase in productivity or economic outcomes.
土壤肥力枯竭是柬埔寨西北地区一年生雨养种植系统面临的主要挑战,该地区最近经历了迅速的农业变化。比较了玉米常规耕作方式和保护性耕作方式(分别为CT和CA)对土壤健康和农艺经济效益的影响。试验于2020年建立,比较了CT和CA与一种覆盖作物(CAS)和CA与三种覆盖作物(CAM)的混合。在种植周期结束时使用Biofunctool®对土壤健康进行评估。2021年和2022年记录了包括覆盖作物和经济作物(玉米)在内的农艺业绩以及中间作物消费量。选取土壤健康、农艺和经济性能的组成部分进行多指标分析。在这些Mollisols上,CA对SHI有积极影响(2021年和2022年分别提高15%和6%),但一些土壤参数每年都有所不同。2021年,较低的植物密度(p <;0.05),说明需要提高免耕播种方式的效率。两年处理间的中间消耗无显著差异。两年间,三种处理的产量均无显著差异,但两种CA制度均保持稳定,但到2022年,CT下降了10%,单柱粒数和籽粒质量较大的产量组成部分在CAS制度下存在一定差异。2021年,CA下的总增加值比CT低12.7%,2022年超过CT 43%。在实施的早期阶段,农艺和经济表现仍然不稳定,两个种植季节的差异很大,强调在这种土壤类型中,CA诱导了土壤健康的显着增加,但尚未导致生产力或经济成果的显着增加。
{"title":"Multicriteria assessment of recently implemented conservation agriculture cropping systems across farmers’ plots in northwestern Cambodia","authors":"Sambo Pheap ,&nbsp;Alexis Thoumazeau ,&nbsp;Jun Murase ,&nbsp;Vang Seng ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Sarthou ,&nbsp;Veng Sar ,&nbsp;Linda Kimbo ,&nbsp;Soklin Kheam ,&nbsp;Pheakdey Chan ,&nbsp;Pao Srean ,&nbsp;Samrith Leang ,&nbsp;Lyda Hok ,&nbsp;Florent Tivet","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100140","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100140","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil fertility depletion is a major challenge for annual rainfed cropping systems in the northwestern region of Cambodia which has recently undergone rapid agrarian changes. On-farm impacts of conventional tillage and Conservation Agriculture-based practices (CT and CA respectively) of maize cultivation on soil health along with agronomic and economic performances were compared. The experiment was set up in 2020 comparing CT and CA with one cover crop (CAS) and CA with a mix of three cover crops (CAM). Soil health was assessed at the end of the cropping cycle using Biofunctool®. Agronomic performances including cover crops and a cash crop (maize) along with intermediate consumption were recorded in 2021 and 2022. Selected components of soil health, agronomic and economic performances were used for multi-criteria analysis. On this Mollisols, SHI was positively impacted under CA (15% and 6% higher in 2021 and 2022), but with some soil parameters varied from one year to the next. In 2021, lower plant density (p ​&lt; ​0.05) was recorded under CA, highlighting the need to improve the efficiency of no-till sowing methods. Intermediate consumption was not significant between the treatments for both years. Non-significant difference in yields was recorded under the three treatments in both years, but while both CA systems remained stable, CT dropped by 10% in 2022 with some differences for yield components with a larger number of grains per column and higher mass of grains under CAS. Gross value added under CA was 12.7% less than CT in 2021, it surpassed CT by 43% in 2022. Agronomic and economic performances were still unstable at this early stage of implementation with wide variability across the two cropping seasons emphasizing that with this soil type, CA induced a significant increase in soil health but did not yet lead to significant increase in productivity or economic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143379067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Farming System
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1