Pub Date : 2021-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.100106
Paloma Lobo Abascal , Mercedes Andeyro García , Ignacio Cristóbal García , José Gutiérrez Alés , Francisca Martínez San Andrés , Inmaculada Parra Ribes , José Cruz Quílez Conde , Pau Pujol Pineda
The role that long-acting reversible contraceptives, such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) can play in reducing the rate of unwanted pregnancies makes overcoming barriers to their use gain in importance. This paper reviews some of the most common barriers to the wide use of IUDs –including levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs)-, offering useful information and suggestions on key aspects before, during and after placement of these devices. To this end, the most up-to-date scientific evidence has been reviewed and where evidence is insufficient, the authors draw on their experience. Among the aspects to be considered before IUD placement, we examine how to determine a woman's eligibility, how to provide proper information, the need to know which IUD is best suited to her characteristics and needs and when is the best time for placement. Studies on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions that have been shown to have an effect on pain relief during IUD placement are discussed. Factors that can predict pain are also discussed, as well as how to help minimize it by improving women's experience during insertion. The risk for complications such as uterine perforation is low. Despite this, healthcare practitioners should be trained on how to manage them and should properly inform users on warning signs and symptoms. IUD placement can be especially difficult in women who present with stenosis after conization or who have undergone a Caesarean section, which we also analyze. Lastly, we examine management of vasovagal syncope and post-placement side-effects, such as pain or lost threads and provide guidelines for follow-up visits.
{"title":"Buenas prácticas en el manejo de dispositivos intrauterinos: consejos y sugerencias para facilitar su inserción","authors":"Paloma Lobo Abascal , Mercedes Andeyro García , Ignacio Cristóbal García , José Gutiérrez Alés , Francisca Martínez San Andrés , Inmaculada Parra Ribes , José Cruz Quílez Conde , Pau Pujol Pineda","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100106","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100106","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The role that long-acting reversible contraceptives, such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) can play in reducing the rate of unwanted pregnancies makes overcoming barriers to their use gain in importance. This paper reviews some of the most common barriers to the wide use of IUDs –including levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs)-, offering useful information and suggestions on key aspects before, during and after placement of these devices. To this end, the most up-to-date scientific evidence has been reviewed and where evidence is insufficient, the authors draw on their experience. Among the aspects to be considered before IUD placement, we examine how to determine a woman's eligibility, how to provide proper information, the need to know which IUD is best suited to her characteristics and needs and when is the best time for placement. Studies on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions that have been shown to have an effect on pain relief during IUD placement are discussed. Factors that can predict pain are also discussed, as well as how to help minimize it by improving women's experience during insertion. The risk for complications such as uterine perforation is low. Despite this, healthcare practitioners should be trained on how to manage them and should properly inform users on warning signs and symptoms. IUD placement can be especially difficult in women who present with stenosis after conization or who have undergone a Caesarean section, which we also analyze. Lastly, we examine management of vasovagal syncope and post-placement side-effects, such as pain or lost threads and provide guidelines for follow-up visits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78740019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.100110
Carmen María García Pascual , Nuria Balaguer , Carlos Simón
Selecting the best embryos to transfer is essential in any in vitro fertilization treatment. For years, embryo morphology supported this selection. Now, the field is seeking more accurate and non-invasive methods for selection. Recent studies show that embryos that do not result in successful pregnancy exhibit different metabolomic profiles from those embryos that result in successful pregnancy, opening a new possibility in the field. Metabolomic profiling and analysis of the cell-free DNA released by the embryo to the culture media are the most promising techniques for embryo selection developed so far.
{"title":"Is metabolomics a reliable technique to assess embryo quality?","authors":"Carmen María García Pascual , Nuria Balaguer , Carlos Simón","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medre.2021.100110","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Selecting the best embryos to transfer is essential in any in vitro fertilization<span> treatment<span>. For years, embryo morphology supported this selection. Now, the field is seeking more accurate and non-invasive methods for selection. Recent studies show that embryos that do not result in successful pregnancy exhibit different metabolomic profiles from those embryos that result in successful pregnancy, opening a new possibility in the field. Metabolomic profiling and analysis of the cell-free DNA released by the embryo to the culture media are the most promising techniques for embryo selection developed so far.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91681850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.100110
C. M. García Pascual, N. Balaguer, C. Simon
{"title":"Is metabolomics a reliable technique to assess embryo quality?","authors":"C. M. García Pascual, N. Balaguer, C. Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medre.2021.100110","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78783414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.100104
Myriam Martin-Inaraja , Cristina Eguizabal
Pluripotent stem cells and spermatogonial stem cells are stem cell types specialized for reconstitution of germ cell development in vitro, as they are capable of differentiating into gametes. Reconstitution of germ cell development, termed in vitro gametogenesis, will provide an experimental platform for a better understanding of germ cell development, as well as an alternative source of artificial gametes for reproduction, with the potential to treat and cure infertility. Since germ cells are especialized cells that will pass all genetic information into the next generation, both the in vitro culture system and its derived-cells from stem cells must be carefully evaluated. In this review, we summarize the progress in in vitro gametogenesis, most of which has been made using mouse models, as well as the future challenges in this field.
{"title":"Artificial gametes: Where are we in 2021?","authors":"Myriam Martin-Inaraja , Cristina Eguizabal","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medre.2021.100104","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pluripotent stem cells and spermatogonial stem cells are stem cell types specialized for reconstitution of germ cell development in vitro, as they are capable of differentiating into gametes. Reconstitution of germ cell development, termed in vitro gametogenesis, will provide an experimental platform for a better understanding of germ cell development, as well as an alternative source of artificial gametes for reproduction, with the potential to treat and cure infertility. Since germ cells are especialized cells that will pass all genetic information into the next generation, both the in vitro culture system and its derived-cells from stem cells must be carefully evaluated. In this review, we summarize the progress in in vitro gametogenesis, most of which has been made using mouse models, as well as the future challenges in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91681851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.100102
Francisco Dominguez , Ruiz María-José
Diet and exposure to certain chemical compounds related to industrial development could be responsible for the increase in the incidence of human reproductive diseases and the consequent decrease in reproductive function worldwide. The role of diet and environment in fertility has received more attention in recent years because nutrition and exposure to contaminants can affect fecundity in women of reproductive age. Here, we review how diet could affect reproduction. Furthermore, we will review how the most ubiquitous contaminants could disrupt endometrial receptivity and implantation, focusing also on clinical studies performed in the last years.
{"title":"Diet and environmental factors affecting reproduction","authors":"Francisco Dominguez , Ruiz María-José","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100102","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100102","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diet and exposure to certain chemical compounds related to industrial development could be responsible for the increase in the incidence of human reproductive diseases and the consequent decrease in reproductive function worldwide. The role of diet and environment in fertility has received more attention in recent years because nutrition and exposure to contaminants can affect fecundity in women of reproductive age. Here, we review how diet could affect reproduction. Furthermore, we will review how the most ubiquitous contaminants could disrupt endometrial receptivity and implantation, focusing also on clinical studies performed in the last years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89708062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.100101
Xavier Vendrell , María-José Escribà
Preimplantation genetic testing is implemented worldwide as an effective tool to avoid transmission of single gene disorders and/or chromosome abnormalities. This approach requires the obtention of representative samples from embryos in order to infer its genetic status. Nowadays, the embryo biopsy is the first-choice method for embryo sampling. Biopsy procedures are safe and widely performed in the clinical routine. However, this intervention is invasive and requires trained personnel and investment in specific equipment. Recently, new sampling methods have been suggested under the term of “non-invasive”. These approaches are based on the existence of cell-free DNA into the embryo or its environment. An increasing number of studies suggest the collection of fluid from embryos or spent culture medium to obtain cell-free DNA to assess the genetic condition of preimplantation embryos avoiding embryo biopsy. The reliability of this attractive idea needs to be confirmed and validated. In this sense, this work offers a deep review of data published to date. Several methods of DNA detection, quantification and amplification have been tested and different protocols and culture systems, with or without additional embryo manipulations, are being investigated. In general terms, an enormous variability among published results is noteworthy. Central aspects as DNA detection rates, contamination with extraembryonic DNA and concordance between results (cell-free DNA versus embryo samples) are centring proofs-of-concept and validation experiments. However, basic questions as the biological origin and representativeness of cell-free DNA are pending to be answered. Solved, unsolved and serious limitations of the new approaches are discussed. A final reflection respecting the state of the technique is offered.
{"title":"Non-invasive PGT","authors":"Xavier Vendrell , María-José Escribà","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100101","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100101","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preimplantation genetic testing is implemented worldwide as an effective tool to avoid transmission of single gene disorders and/or chromosome abnormalities. This approach requires the obtention of representative samples from embryos in order to infer its genetic status. Nowadays, the embryo biopsy is the first-choice method for embryo sampling. Biopsy procedures are safe and widely performed in the clinical routine. However, this intervention is invasive and requires trained personnel and investment in specific equipment. Recently, new sampling methods have been suggested under the term of “non-invasive”. These approaches are based on the existence of cell-free DNA into the embryo or its environment. An increasing number of studies suggest the collection of fluid from embryos or spent culture medium to obtain cell-free DNA to assess the genetic condition of preimplantation embryos avoiding embryo biopsy. The reliability of this attractive idea needs to be confirmed and validated. In this sense, this work offers a deep review of data published to date. Several methods of DNA detection, quantification and amplification have been tested and different protocols and culture systems, with or without additional embryo manipulations, are being investigated. In general terms, an enormous variability among published results is noteworthy. Central aspects as DNA detection rates, contamination with extraembryonic DNA and concordance between results (cell-free DNA versus embryo samples) are centring proofs-of-concept and validation experiments. However, basic questions as the biological origin and representativeness of cell-free DNA are pending to be answered. Solved, unsolved and serious limitations of the new approaches are discussed. A final reflection respecting the state of the technique is offered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75907738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-05-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.100103
Juan A. García-Velasco , Josep Santaló
{"title":"Empezamos una nueva etapa","authors":"Juan A. García-Velasco , Josep Santaló","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100103","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87487905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.02.002
José A. Horcajadas , David García-Sánchez , David Cotán , Santiago Munné
{"title":"Synchrony: una nueva aplicación en reproducción asistida","authors":"José A. Horcajadas , David García-Sánchez , David Cotán , Santiago Munné","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 1","pages":"Page 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76464104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2020.12.001
Carlos Aulesa , Victoria Vega , Henar Balbuena , Jose Ramón Alonso , Pedro Jiménez , Jordi Ramis , Jose María Gris
Introduction
The aim of this work, is to find the prevalence of marijuana use in a subfertile population, and to carry out a comparative prospective study of the seminogram parameters of a group of subfertile patients, who are habitual marijuana users, versus a group of nested control cases of non-users.
Material and methods
2320 men were studied, 70% of patients from Primary Care Centers and 30% from hospital outpatient consultations. The analysis of sperm concentration and motility was carried out with a SCA® automated semen analyzer. The comparative study has been carried out, by applying a novel statistical methodology called «case-control nested», which is a hybrid case-control variation.
Results
The prevalence of marijuana use has been calculated in a population of subfertile men. Statistical analysis of the semen values of the group of marijuana users versus the control group shows that there are no significant differences between them.
Conclusions
In the group of subfertile men studied, a prevalence of 10.26% of habitual marijuana users was observed. In our results, no significant differences were observed between the two groups studied, so we are considering the additional performance of new sperm functionalism tests, to explain the subfertility that has been observed in some of these patients who use marijuana, who present a normal seminogram.
{"title":"Estudio comparativo de los parámetros del seminograma en una población de varones subfértiles consumidores de marihuana","authors":"Carlos Aulesa , Victoria Vega , Henar Balbuena , Jose Ramón Alonso , Pedro Jiménez , Jordi Ramis , Jose María Gris","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2020.12.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.medre.2020.12.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The aim of this work, is to find the prevalence of marijuana use in a subfertile population, and to carry out a comparative prospective study of the seminogram parameters of a group of subfertile patients, who are habitual marijuana users, versus a group of nested control cases of non-users.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>2320 men were studied, 70% of patients from Primary Care Centers and 30% from hospital outpatient consultations. The analysis of sperm concentration and motility was carried out with a SCA® automated semen analyzer. The comparative study has been carried out, by applying a novel statistical methodology called «case-control nested», which is a hybrid case-control variation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of marijuana use has been calculated in a population of subfertile men. Statistical analysis of the semen values of the group of marijuana users versus the control group shows that there are no significant differences between them.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the group of subfertile men studied, a prevalence of 10.26% of habitual marijuana users was observed. In our results, no significant differences were observed between the two groups studied, so we are considering the additional performance of new sperm functionalism tests, to explain the subfertility that has been observed in some of these patients who use marijuana, who present a normal seminogram.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75988359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-01-01DOI: 10.1016/j.medre.2021.02.001
Miriam Iglesias , Mª Luisa López-Regalado , Irene Molina , Luis Martínez-Granados , María Serrano , Carla Olmedo , Empar Ferrer , Alba Mauri , Ernesto Veiga , Nereida Ortiz , José A. Castilla , Grupo Interés de Calidad de ASEBIR (GiCa-ASEBIR)
Introduction
With the publication of the standard UNE 179007:2013, quality indicators (QIs) for the Assisted Human Reproduction Laboratory (AHRL) were standardised. Subsequently, in 2017 a committee of experts from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine published quality indicators for the Embryology Laboratory under the Vienna Consensus (VC). This work seeks to know the opinion of clinical embryologists on the UNE 179007:2013 and CV ICs, assessing their usefulness and the possible need to introduce new ICs.
Material and methods
A survey were developed and sent to potential participants through the ASEBIR website, with access from July 2018 to April 2019. In this survey, participants were asked to evaluate the CIs of UNE 179007:2013, and to express their opinion on the usefulness of introducing new indicators that are not currently being used. In addition, twelve of the CIs assessed in the CV and their proposed specifications were evaluated in the survey.
Results
Twenty-eight participants from Assisted Reproduction centres responded to the survey. Of these, 87.5% indicated that they use CIs in their daily practice. Only 29% found the current IC of «percentage of progressive motile sperm recovery»useful. Sixty-one percent of the centres proposed replacing it with «percentage of motile sperm after EMR» without referring to the initial values. Regarding the incorporation of new indicators, the most voted CIs were «percentage of eSET» (96% in favour) and «percentage of embryos transferred». Most of the CIs proposed in the CV are positively valued by the respondents, who are in favour of their use.
Conclusion
Our results support an update of the UNE 179007:2013 QIs, both improving some of the current ones and incorporating new QIs resulting from the QC.
{"title":"Valoración de los indicadores de calidad de ASEBIR y Consenso de Viena para el laboratorio de embriología: opinión de los usuarios","authors":"Miriam Iglesias , Mª Luisa López-Regalado , Irene Molina , Luis Martínez-Granados , María Serrano , Carla Olmedo , Empar Ferrer , Alba Mauri , Ernesto Veiga , Nereida Ortiz , José A. Castilla , Grupo Interés de Calidad de ASEBIR (GiCa-ASEBIR)","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.02.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the publication of the standard UNE 179007:2013, quality indicators (QIs) for the Assisted Human Reproduction Laboratory (AHRL) were standardised. Subsequently, in 2017 a committee of experts from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine published quality indicators for the Embryology Laboratory under the Vienna Consensus (VC). This work seeks to know the opinion of clinical embryologists on the UNE 179007:2013 and CV ICs, assessing their usefulness and the possible need to introduce new ICs.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A survey were developed and sent to potential participants through the ASEBIR website, with access from July 2018 to April 2019. In this survey, participants were asked to evaluate the CIs of UNE 179007:2013, and to express their opinion on the usefulness of introducing new indicators that are not currently being used. In addition, twelve of the CIs assessed in the CV and their proposed specifications were evaluated in the survey.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-eight participants from Assisted Reproduction centres responded to the survey. Of these, 87.5% indicated that they use CIs in their daily practice. Only 29% found the current IC of «percentage of progressive motile sperm recovery»useful. Sixty-one percent of the centres proposed replacing it with «percentage of motile sperm after EMR» without referring to the initial values. Regarding the incorporation of new indicators, the most voted CIs were «percentage of eSET» (96% in favour) and «percentage of embryos transferred». Most of the CIs proposed in the CV are positively valued by the respondents, who are in favour of their use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results support an update of the UNE 179007:2013 QIs, both improving some of the current ones and incorporating new QIs resulting from the QC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82738049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}