Pub Date : 2025-10-29DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100114
Scott J. Fitzpatrick , Grenville Rose , Melanie Giugni , Louise A. Ellis , Alyssa R. Morse , Cassandra Chakouch , Erin Oldman , Benn Miller , Helen T. Oni , Michelle Banfield
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Strengths and challenges for implementing non-clinical safe spaces for people experiencing emotional distress and/or suicidal crisis: A mixed-methods study from Australia” [SSM Health Syst. 5 (2025) 100100]","authors":"Scott J. Fitzpatrick , Grenville Rose , Melanie Giugni , Louise A. Ellis , Alyssa R. Morse , Cassandra Chakouch , Erin Oldman , Benn Miller , Helen T. Oni , Michelle Banfield","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100114","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100114","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Community health workers (CHWs) are crucial to the achievement of Universal Health Coverage. In their roles, CHWs often experience a range of stressors that can affect their wellbeing. This scoping review aims to understand the stressors and protective factors that influence the mental wellbeing of CHWs in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
Methods
We reviewed English literature that we searched in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. We also conducted an online search for grey literature in Google Scholar. Our search returned 11,135 articles. After screening out duplicates and ineligible articles, we included 97 articles that met the inclusion criteria.
Results
We categorized findings into interrelated domains: protective factors and stressors, which are mediated by individual characteristics. Protective factors that promote mental wellbeing of CHWs include altruism, social recognition, incentives, psychosocial support, flexibility of their work, and, training. Stressors that create anxiety and hinder mental wellbeing include: gender-based violence, harassment, delayed payment of incentives, unclear career pathways, heavy workload, unrealistic performance targets, stigma, and inadequate supervision. In the review, we developed a conceptual framework for programs and research on the mental wellbeing of CHWs in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Conclusion
Strengthening mental wellbeing requires policy interventions such as fair remuneration, clear career pathways, capacity building, and psychosocial support. Future research may need to prioritize CHW wellbeing and advocacy for their formal integration into the health workforce to advance universal health coverage and ensure no one is left behind.
{"title":"Protective factors and stressors that influence the mental wellbeing of community health workers in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review","authors":"Robinson Njoroge Karuga , Obaida Karim , Semonty Jahan , Anne Ngunjiri , Caroline Kabaria , Clement Oduor , Eunice Omanga , Judy Wairiuko , Maaike Seekles , Laura Dean , Lilian Otiso , Linet Okoth , Nahitun Naher , Patricia Okoth , Ranjan Koiri , Robbinson Nduati , Sabina Rashid , Sammy Gachigua , Selima Kabir , Stella Gitia , Blessing Mberu","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100147","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100147","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Community health workers (CHWs) are crucial to the achievement of Universal Health Coverage. In their roles, CHWs often experience a range of stressors that can affect their wellbeing. This scoping review aims to understand the stressors and protective factors that influence the mental wellbeing of CHWs in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed English literature that we searched in MEDLINE and Scopus databases. We also conducted an online search for grey literature in Google Scholar. Our search returned 11,135 articles. After screening out duplicates and ineligible articles, we included 97 articles that met the inclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We categorized findings into interrelated domains: protective factors and stressors, which are mediated by individual characteristics. Protective factors that promote mental wellbeing of CHWs include altruism, social recognition, incentives, psychosocial support, flexibility of their work, and, training. Stressors that create anxiety and hinder mental wellbeing include: gender-based violence, harassment, delayed payment of incentives, unclear career pathways, heavy workload, unrealistic performance targets, stigma, and inadequate supervision. In the review, we developed a conceptual framework for programs and research on the mental wellbeing of CHWs in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Strengthening mental wellbeing requires policy interventions such as fair remuneration, clear career pathways, capacity building, and psychosocial support. Future research may need to prioritize CHW wellbeing and advocacy for their formal integration into the health workforce to advance universal health coverage and ensure no one is left behind.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100148
Celia Blaas , Mariano Salazar , Dell D. Saulnier
Power is infrequently explored in health system resilience, yet is integral to understand the choices made that shape what is prioritized and funded for resilience, which actors are given responsibility for resilience, and which health system capacities are emphasized. This review aimed to explore how power is reflected in strategies and guidelines for health system resilience in grey literature from global governance actors. We included 22 health system resilience strategies and guidelines and adapted a power-sensitive framework to extract data related to power in resilience literature. We found that documents prioritized the health system functions of service delivery and resource generation over governance and financing for resilience, and external shocks were a focus over chronic, internal health system stressors, with a lack of strategies to shift power and authority to actors evenly across community, national and global levels. Governance actors framed resilience as a positive adaptation and an intermediary to other health system goals without acknowledgement of negative outcomes of adaptations for resilience. This review draws attention to explicit and implicit reflections of power in the framing of health system resilience and the lack of clear recommendations to address structural, systemic issues or empower actors across all health system levels.
{"title":"The power to prioritize the health system resilience agenda: A review of global strategies and guidelines","authors":"Celia Blaas , Mariano Salazar , Dell D. Saulnier","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100148","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100148","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Power is infrequently explored in health system resilience, yet is integral to understand the choices made that shape what is prioritized and funded for resilience, which actors are given responsibility for resilience, and which health system capacities are emphasized. This review aimed to explore how power is reflected in strategies and guidelines for health system resilience in grey literature from global governance actors. We included 22 health system resilience strategies and guidelines and adapted a power-sensitive framework to extract data related to power in resilience literature. We found that documents prioritized the health system functions of service delivery and resource generation over governance and financing for resilience, and external shocks were a focus over chronic, internal health system stressors, with a lack of strategies to shift power and authority to actors evenly across community, national and global levels. Governance actors framed resilience as a positive adaptation and an intermediary to other health system goals without acknowledgement of negative outcomes of adaptations for resilience. This review draws attention to explicit and implicit reflections of power in the framing of health system resilience and the lack of clear recommendations to address structural, systemic issues or empower actors across all health system levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-25DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100146
Umbreen Dildar , Saba Khurshid , Shagufta Perveen
Background
Family involvement is a critical component of person-centered cardiac care, contributing to improved patient outcomes and continuity of care. However, integrating family members into hospital-based cardiac care presents various challenges, particularly for frontline nurses. Understanding these barriers from the perspective of nursing staff is vital for informing health system reforms. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the barriers faced by nurses when involving families in cardiac patient care.
Methods
An exploratory qualitative study design was conducted with 10 cardiac care nurses (7 females and 6 males; age range 26–46 years) from public and private tertiary hospitals in the twin cities of Pakistan between February 2024 to September, 2024. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Semi structure interview ewer conducted and thematic analysis was used to identify key themes reflecting nurses’ insights into the challenges of involving families in patient care.
Results
Five major themes emerged: (1) lack of institutional guidelines and structured protocols for family involvement; (2) emotional burden and role strain experienced by nurses during family interactions; (3) systemic constraints such as understaffing and time pressure; and (4) communication challenges due to sociocultural differences and unclear role expectations (5) cultural and ethical barriers in nurse-family dynamics. Nurses expressed a desire for clearer policy direction, more training, and institutional support.
Conclusion
The study underscores the need for health system-level interventions to strengthen the role of families in cardiac care. Addressing the identified barriers can promote more inclusive, equitable, and effective care delivery models that support both patients and health professionals.
{"title":"Nurses' perspectives on barriers to family-centered cardiac care in Pakistan","authors":"Umbreen Dildar , Saba Khurshid , Shagufta Perveen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100146","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100146","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Family involvement is a critical component of person-centered cardiac care, contributing to improved patient outcomes and continuity of care. However, integrating family members into hospital-based cardiac care presents various challenges, particularly for frontline nurses. Understanding these barriers from the perspective of nursing staff is vital for informing health system reforms. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the barriers faced by nurses when involving families in cardiac patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An exploratory qualitative study design was conducted with 10 cardiac care nurses (7 females and 6 males; age range 26–46 years) from public and private tertiary hospitals in the twin cities of Pakistan between February 2024 to September, 2024. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Semi structure interview ewer conducted and thematic analysis was used to identify key themes reflecting nurses’ insights into the challenges of involving families in patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five major themes emerged: (1) lack of institutional guidelines and structured protocols for family involvement; (2) emotional burden and role strain experienced by nurses during family interactions; (3) systemic constraints such as understaffing and time pressure; and (4) communication challenges due to sociocultural differences and unclear role expectations (5) cultural and ethical barriers in nurse-family dynamics. Nurses expressed a desire for clearer policy direction, more training, and institutional support.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study underscores the need for health system-level interventions to strengthen the role of families in cardiac care. Addressing the identified barriers can promote more inclusive, equitable, and effective care delivery models that support both patients and health professionals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100143
Eric Ping Hung Li , Trina Kushnerik , Cherisse L. Seaton , Kathy L. Rush , Puneet Aulakh , Mike Zajko , Khalad Hasan , Rajeev Manhas , Vida Nyagre Yakong , Robert Janke
Digitalization in the health sector has created numerous opportunities for social innovators and change-makers. However, there is a lack of integrated knowledge of how the latest technological changes have impacted social innovators from marginalized populations living in rural contexts who are often considered the “left-behind” segment in the age of digitalization. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence for rural digital social innovations for health and social care. Drawing on searches from multiple databases we adopted a Context-Process-Outcomes Model to evaluate 25 empirical studies focused on innovations within the healthcare sector (18 studies) and general community level innovations (7 studies). Geographical distance between providers and rural patients was often the context for healthcare innovations, necessitating processes with multiple levels of collaboration, whereas diverse community-specific challenges were usually addressed through grassroots initiatives. Most healthcare and community level innovations had evidence of positive outcomes (e.g., positive impacts on health service utilization or community health). Although digitalization accelerated the scope and reach of social innovations, substantial human investment and rural community engagement remained crucial for success. In conclusion, our application of the Context-Process-Outcomes framework enabled us to aggregate diverse findings and unpack the role of digitalization in rural social innovations.
{"title":"Rural digital social innovation for health and social care: A systematic review","authors":"Eric Ping Hung Li , Trina Kushnerik , Cherisse L. Seaton , Kathy L. Rush , Puneet Aulakh , Mike Zajko , Khalad Hasan , Rajeev Manhas , Vida Nyagre Yakong , Robert Janke","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100143","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100143","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digitalization in the health sector has created numerous opportunities for social innovators and change-makers. However, there is a lack of integrated knowledge of how the latest technological changes have impacted social innovators from marginalized populations living in rural contexts who are often considered the “left-behind” segment in the age of digitalization. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence for rural digital social innovations for health and social care. Drawing on searches from multiple databases we adopted a Context-Process-Outcomes Model to evaluate 25 empirical studies focused on innovations within the healthcare sector (18 studies) and general community level innovations (7 studies). Geographical distance between providers and rural patients was often the context for healthcare innovations, necessitating processes with multiple levels of collaboration, whereas diverse community-specific challenges were usually addressed through grassroots initiatives. Most healthcare and community level innovations had evidence of positive outcomes (e.g., positive impacts on health service utilization or community health). Although digitalization accelerated the scope and reach of social innovations, substantial human investment and rural community engagement remained crucial for success. In conclusion, our application of the Context-Process-Outcomes framework enabled us to aggregate diverse findings and unpack the role of digitalization in rural social innovations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100144
Lauren E. Allison , Harriet Ruysen , María J. Sánchez Alva , Priyesh Agravat , Eva M. Loucaides , Meghan Bruce Kumar , Alexandra Molina-García , Ismail Sebina , Elizabeth J.A. Fitchett , Neal Russell , Joy E. Lawn
Context
Despite global progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 2.3 million newborn deaths and 1.9 million stillbirths occur each year, with a disproportionate burden in humanitarian and fragile contexts. We investigated how funding for newborn health research during the SDG period (2016–2020) varied according to country fragility and language.
Methods
We conducted a systematic analysis of research grants using the Dimensions database, classifying grants by research theme, stage of the research process, type of funding agency, and classification of donor and recipient countries according to the World Bank's income ranking. The grants were then analyzed according to the Fragile States Index and the official languages of the recipient countries.
Results
Between 2016 and 2020, USD 308.2 million was awarded across 1,372 grants involving at least one low- or middle-income recipient country (LMIC). Of this amount, 35% (USD 108.0 million) funded grants involving both an LMIC and a recipient from one of the 30 most fragile countries, while only 19% (USD 57.3 million) was awarded directly to organizations based in the 30 most fragile countries. Among these recipients from fragile states, most funding supported intervention research (USD 33.6 million), with minimal investment in implementation (USD 5.0 million) or basic science (USD 2.8 million). Linguistic disparities were evident: of all grants, recipients from English-speaking countries received the largest amount (USD 115.5 million).
Interpretation
Significant inequalities persist in the allocation of funding for research on newborn health and stillbirths. Despite bearing a disproportionate burden of neonatal mortality, organizations in non-English-speaking countries and the 30 most fragile countries have received limited research funding. These disparities contribute to gaps in evidence regarding impact in humanitarian settings, hinder implementation, and exacerbate global inequalities in research and health.
{"title":"Who gets funded? Global analysis of research funding for newborn health and stillbirth in fragile and non-English speaking countries, 2016–2020","authors":"Lauren E. Allison , Harriet Ruysen , María J. Sánchez Alva , Priyesh Agravat , Eva M. Loucaides , Meghan Bruce Kumar , Alexandra Molina-García , Ismail Sebina , Elizabeth J.A. Fitchett , Neal Russell , Joy E. Lawn","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100144","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100144","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Despite global progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 2.3 million newborn deaths and 1.9 million stillbirths occur each year, with a disproportionate burden in humanitarian and fragile contexts. We investigated how funding for newborn health research during the SDG period (2016–2020) varied according to country fragility and language.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic analysis of research grants using the Dimensions database, classifying grants by research theme, stage of the research process, type of funding agency, and classification of donor and recipient countries according to the World Bank's income ranking. The grants were then analyzed according to the Fragile States Index and the official languages of the recipient countries.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between 2016 and 2020, USD 308.2 million was awarded across 1,372 grants involving at least one low- or middle-income recipient country (LMIC). Of this amount, 35% (USD 108.0 million) funded grants involving both an LMIC and a recipient from one of the 30 most fragile countries, while only 19% (USD 57.3 million) was awarded directly to organizations based in the 30 most fragile countries. Among these recipients from fragile states, most funding supported intervention research (USD 33.6 million), with minimal investment in implementation (USD 5.0 million) or basic science (USD 2.8 million). Linguistic disparities were evident: of all grants, recipients from English-speaking countries received the largest amount (USD 115.5 million).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Significant inequalities persist in the allocation of funding for research on newborn health and stillbirths. Despite bearing a disproportionate burden of neonatal mortality, organizations in non-English-speaking countries and the 30 most fragile countries have received limited research funding. These disparities contribute to gaps in evidence regarding impact in humanitarian settings, hinder implementation, and exacerbate global inequalities in research and health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100145
Augustine Onyeaghala , Theophilus Faruna
The efforts to eradicate HIV/AIDS, and other diseases of poverty- Malaria and Tuberculosis have consumed a significant proportion of financial allocation for healthcare. For over two decades, Nigeria has received support from international funding such as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and other donor agencies. These funds have been used to strengthen Nigeria’s clinical laboratory system, combat the HIV/AIDS epidemic, improve HIV testing and treatment, and reduce HIV-related mortality and morbidity. Declining external funding poses a significant challenge to sustaining these hard-won gains, especially in a nation where budgetary allocation for healthcare is below the projected average. This paper examines the critical challenges that may arise from the reduction or withdrawal of donor funding for HIV and other programs, and provides suggestions on alternative sources of financing. The tips, when integrated into the national health system and implemented, could help to sustain the gains made so far in clinical laboratory systems, the fight against HIV/AIDS, Malaria, and Tuberculosis.
{"title":"Sustaining gains in laboratory systems, HIV, malaria, tuberculosis programs amidst declining international funding: Key considerations for health integration","authors":"Augustine Onyeaghala , Theophilus Faruna","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100145","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100145","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efforts to eradicate HIV/AIDS, and other diseases of poverty- Malaria and Tuberculosis have consumed a significant proportion of financial allocation for healthcare. For over two decades, Nigeria has received support from international funding such as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and other donor agencies. These funds have been used to strengthen Nigeria’s clinical laboratory system, combat the HIV/AIDS epidemic, improve HIV testing and treatment, and reduce HIV-related mortality and morbidity. Declining external funding poses a significant challenge to sustaining these hard-won gains, especially in a nation where budgetary allocation for healthcare is below the projected average. This paper examines the critical challenges that may arise from the reduction or withdrawal of donor funding for HIV and other programs, and provides suggestions on alternative sources of financing. The tips, when integrated into the national health system and implemented, could help to sustain the gains made so far in clinical laboratory systems, the fight against HIV/AIDS, Malaria, and Tuberculosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145415520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-08DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100142
Rui Jie Ng, Wan Yuen Choo, Noran Naqiah Hairi, Chiu-Wan Ng
Since the 1980s, private health insurance (PHI) in Malaysia has undergone significant changes, closely linked to the increased healthcare privatisation driven by government policies. Given the rising number of insured individuals and ongoing government encouragement efforts, this study aims to assess how the development of PHI has influenced financial risk protection. This research adopts a case study approach, combining document analysis and key informant interviews to gain a comprehensive understanding of PHI development. A total of 210 documents detailing PHI development from 1980 to 2023 were analysed. Additionally, stakeholder mapping using the Mendelow matrix identified ten key informants, focusing on those within the high-power, high-interest quadrant. Framework analysis was applied, using an adapted model encompassing five key themes: public policy, demand, market structure, market conduct, and performance. Under "public policy", the study examined government plans, industry governance, and relevant legislation. Analysis of "demand" identified a complex interplay of factors driving PHI uptake. The "market structure" revealed characteristics of an oligopolistic market, with a small number of insurers dominating. Under "market conduct," the evolution of benefit designs largely strengthened financial risk protection. Finally, the "performance" analysis focused on PHI coverage, claims inflation, equity, and financial risk protection. This study revealed the dual effect of PHI development in Malaysia, with certain aspects enhancing financial risk protection while others undermine it. Assessing PHI’s financial protective effect is vital as Malaysia embarks on health system reforms and offers valuable insights for other countries exploring PHI as an alternative financing strategy.
{"title":"The development of private health insurance in Malaysia: A case study analysis exploring its influence on financial risk protection","authors":"Rui Jie Ng, Wan Yuen Choo, Noran Naqiah Hairi, Chiu-Wan Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the 1980s, private health insurance (PHI) in Malaysia has undergone significant changes, closely linked to the increased healthcare privatisation driven by government policies. Given the rising number of insured individuals and ongoing government encouragement efforts, this study aims to assess how the development of PHI has influenced financial risk protection. This research adopts a case study approach, combining document analysis and key informant interviews to gain a comprehensive understanding of PHI development. A total of 210 documents detailing PHI development from 1980 to 2023 were analysed. Additionally, stakeholder mapping using the Mendelow matrix identified ten key informants, focusing on those within the high-power, high-interest quadrant. Framework analysis was applied, using an adapted model encompassing five key themes: public policy, demand, market structure, market conduct, and performance. Under \"public policy\", the study examined government plans, industry governance, and relevant legislation. Analysis of \"demand\" identified a complex interplay of factors driving PHI uptake. The \"market structure\" revealed characteristics of an oligopolistic market, with a small number of insurers dominating. Under \"market conduct,\" the evolution of benefit designs largely strengthened financial risk protection. Finally, the \"performance\" analysis focused on PHI coverage, claims inflation, equity, and financial risk protection. This study revealed the dual effect of PHI development in Malaysia, with certain aspects enhancing financial risk protection while others undermine it. Assessing PHI’s financial protective effect is vital as Malaysia embarks on health system reforms and offers valuable insights for other countries exploring PHI as an alternative financing strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145319760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-07DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100138
Dwidjo Susilo , Luh Putu Lila Wulandari , Evi Sukmayeti , Augustine Asante , Stephen Jan , Hasbullah Thabrany , Viroj Tangcharoensathien , Virginia Wiseman , Marco Liverani
Indonesia's National Health Insurance system - the Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) - is one of the largest single-payer health insurance schemes in the world, aiming to provide equitable and affordable healthcare to a population of over 280 million. Since its launch in 2014, the JKN has achieved near-universal enrolment, covering 98 % of Indonesians in 2024. However, progress towards universal health coverage – understood as access to the health services people need, when and where they need them, without financial hardship - has been hindered by financing deficits and operational hurdles faced by healthcare providers. In this paper, we examine critical issues affecting the implementation of JKN through the analysis of 20 in-depth interviews and a focus group discussion with government officers and health sector managers at the national and provincial level. Data analysis was guided by a framework combining health systems building blocks and dimensions of access to services. The findings highlight persistent challenges despite the JKN's wide coverage, including difficulties among informal sector workers in paying premiums, regional disparities in service access and health workforce distribution, inefficiencies in provider payment mechanisms, and weak information systems for tracking subsidised members. Interviews also revealed a growing financial and administrative strain on hospitals linked to frequent regulatory changes. To address these issues, we recommend three priority reforms: (1) implement sliding-scale subsidies for informal sector workers; (2) improve provider payment models by introducing cost-sharing for elective services; and (3) adopt participatory policymaking processes to ensure reforms are sustainable and inclusive.
印度尼西亚的国民健康保险系统——Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN)——是世界上最大的单一付款人健康保险计划之一,旨在为超过2.8亿人口提供公平和负担得起的医疗保健。自2014年启动以来,JKN几乎实现了全民注册,到2024年覆盖了98% %的印度尼西亚人。然而,由于卫生保健提供者面临的资金赤字和业务障碍,在实现全民健康覆盖方面取得的进展受到阻碍。全民健康覆盖被理解为在人们需要的时间和地点获得所需的卫生服务,而不会出现经济困难。在本文中,我们通过对20次深度访谈的分析以及与国家和省级政府官员和卫生部门管理人员的焦点小组讨论,研究了影响JKN实施的关键问题。数据分析是在一个框架的指导下进行的,该框架结合了卫生系统的组成部分和获得服务的各个方面。尽管JKN覆盖范围很广,但调查结果强调了持续存在的挑战,包括非正规部门工人在支付保费方面的困难、服务获取和卫生人力分布方面的地区差异、提供者支付机制的效率低下以及跟踪补贴成员的信息系统薄弱。采访还显示,与频繁的监管变化有关,医院的财务和行政压力越来越大。为了解决这些问题,我们建议三项优先改革:(1)对非正规部门工人实行滑动补贴;(2)通过引入可选服务的成本分担机制,改善医疗服务提供者的付费模式;(3)采用参与式决策过程,确保改革具有可持续性和包容性。
{"title":"Can Indonesia achieve universal health coverage? Organisational and financing challenges in implementing the national health insurance system","authors":"Dwidjo Susilo , Luh Putu Lila Wulandari , Evi Sukmayeti , Augustine Asante , Stephen Jan , Hasbullah Thabrany , Viroj Tangcharoensathien , Virginia Wiseman , Marco Liverani","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100138","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100138","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indonesia's National Health Insurance system - the Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) - is one of the largest single-payer health insurance schemes in the world, aiming to provide equitable and affordable healthcare to a population of over 280 million. Since its launch in 2014, the JKN has achieved near-universal enrolment, covering 98 % of Indonesians in 2024. However, progress towards universal health coverage – understood as access to the health services people need, when and where they need them, without financial hardship - has been hindered by financing deficits and operational hurdles faced by healthcare providers. In this paper, we examine critical issues affecting the implementation of JKN through the analysis of 20 in-depth interviews and a focus group discussion with government officers and health sector managers at the national and provincial level. Data analysis was guided by a framework combining health systems building blocks and dimensions of access to services. The findings highlight persistent challenges despite the JKN's wide coverage, including difficulties among informal sector workers in paying premiums, regional disparities in service access and health workforce distribution, inefficiencies in provider payment mechanisms, and weak information systems for tracking subsidised members. Interviews also revealed a growing financial and administrative strain on hospitals linked to frequent regulatory changes. To address these issues, we recommend three priority reforms: (1) implement sliding-scale subsidies for informal sector workers; (2) improve provider payment models by introducing cost-sharing for elective services; and (3) adopt participatory policymaking processes to ensure reforms are sustainable and inclusive.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145265181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Institutional delivery rates in India remain low, with significant interstate disparities. There is limited research on how supply-side factors influence maternal delivery choices. This study examined whether improvements in the quality of delivery services can impact maternal delivery location decisions using the Integrated Child Health and Immunization Survey (2015–2016). The national survey covered 1510 public planning units (PU) and 44,571 households. We constructed three indices of quality: physical infrastructure, health staff availability, and equipment and vaccine availability. Using multinomial probit regression, we analyzed the relationship between place of delivery for the household’s youngest child under age two and PU quality. Additionally, we conducted Fairlie decomposition analysis to examine factors contributing to differences in delivery location by income group. Mothers living near higher-quality public health facilities, as assessed by all three indices, were more likely to deliver in public facilities and less likely to choose private facilities or home births. The effects of the equipment and vaccine availability index were the strongest and most consistent across terciles, followed by the health staff index in urban areas and the infrastructure index in rural areas. Households in the bottom two wealth quintiles had access to lower-quality public health facilities. Limited access to quality facilities was linked to lower institutional delivery rates when compared to households in the top three wealth quintiles. Improving the quality of health facilities, particularly in low-income areas, can improve institutional delivery rates in public facilities.
{"title":"Public health facility quality and place of delivery in India: A decomposition analysis across wealth groups","authors":"Amit Summan , Arindam Nandi , Deepshikha Batheja , Abhik Banerji , Ramanan Laxminarayan","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100140","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100140","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Institutional delivery rates in India remain low, with significant interstate disparities. There is limited research on how supply-side factors influence maternal delivery choices. This study examined whether improvements in the quality of delivery services can impact maternal delivery location decisions using the Integrated Child Health and Immunization Survey (2015–2016). The national survey covered 1510 public planning units (PU) and 44,571 households. We constructed three indices of quality: physical infrastructure, health staff availability, and equipment and vaccine availability. Using multinomial probit regression, we analyzed the relationship between place of delivery for the household’s youngest child under age two and PU quality. Additionally, we conducted Fairlie decomposition analysis to examine factors contributing to differences in delivery location by income group. Mothers living near higher-quality public health facilities, as assessed by all three indices, were more likely to deliver in public facilities and less likely to choose private facilities or home births. The effects of the equipment and vaccine availability index were the strongest and most consistent across terciles, followed by the health staff index in urban areas and the infrastructure index in rural areas. Households in the bottom two wealth quintiles had access to lower-quality public health facilities. Limited access to quality facilities was linked to lower institutional delivery rates when compared to households in the top three wealth quintiles. Improving the quality of health facilities, particularly in low-income areas, can improve institutional delivery rates in public facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145265264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}