Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-20DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000200
Daniel Razick, Noorhan Amani, Lara Ali, Mark Bachir, Ahmed Salem, Vijay Khatri
Within the realm of health care quality assessment, quality assurance and safety grading systems play a vital role in gauging hospital performance and communicating results to the general public. The primary objective of this review is to analyze the hospitals in California through the lens of Leapfrog Safety Grades and discuss the complex interplay of geographical location, hospital size, and larger system affiliation status. Leapfrog Safety Grades, hospital characteristics, and geographic information were collected. Hospitals were categorized by geographic region, size, rural/urban classification, and larger system affiliation status. Of the 284 hospitals included in the study, 95 were given a grade of A, 68 given a grade of B, 93 given a grade of C, 23 given a grade of D, 2 given a grade of F, and 3 were not graded. The vast majority of hospitals in California were classified as urban, with 183 falling under this category. The average number of hospital beds and SD was 227 ± 47.57. On average, hospitals that received a grade of D were significantly smaller in size than those that received a grade of A, while hospitals that received a grade of B or C were similar in size. A total of 107 hospitals were affiliated with a larger health care system. About 70% of hospitals affiliated with a system received an A or B grade, while 50% of unaffiliated hospitals received an A or B grade. Results of this study demonstrate a need for improving health care access and quality in medically underserved urban and rural areas. Hospitals affiliated with a larger health care system received higher grades than unaffiliated hospitals, suggesting that affiliation may also play a role in the implementation and mitigation of factors that contribute to Leapfrog Safety Grades.
在医疗质量评估领域,质量保证和安全分级系统在衡量医院绩效和向公众传达结果方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本综述的主要目的是通过 Leapfrog 安全等级的视角对加利福尼亚州的医院进行分析,并讨论地理位置、医院规模和较大系统附属地位之间复杂的相互作用。我们收集了 Leapfrog 安全等级、医院特征和地理信息。医院按地理区域、规模、农村/城市分类和较大系统附属状态进行分类。在纳入研究的 284 家医院中,95 家医院被评为 A 级,68 家医院被评为 B 级,93 家医院被评为 C 级,23 家医院被评为 D 级,2 家医院被评为 F 级,3 家医院未被评级。加利福尼亚州的绝大多数医院被划分为城市医院,其中 183 家属于城市医院。医院床位数的平均值为 227 ± 47.57。平均而言,获得 D 级的医院规模明显小于获得 A 级的医院,而获得 B 级或 C 级的医院规模相近。共有 107 家医院隶属于较大的医疗保健系统。隶属于某个系统的医院中约有 70% 获得了 A 级或 B 级,而未隶属于该系统的医院中则有 50% 获得了 A 级或 B 级。这项研究结果表明,在医疗服务不足的城市和农村地区,有必要改善医疗服务的可及性和质量。隶属于大型医疗保健系统的医院比未隶属于该系统的医院获得了更高的评级,这表明隶属关系也可能在实施和缓解导致 Leapfrog 安全评级的因素方面发挥作用。
{"title":"Leapfrog Safety Grades in California Hospitals: A Data Analysis.","authors":"Daniel Razick, Noorhan Amani, Lara Ali, Mark Bachir, Ahmed Salem, Vijay Khatri","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000200","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within the realm of health care quality assessment, quality assurance and safety grading systems play a vital role in gauging hospital performance and communicating results to the general public. The primary objective of this review is to analyze the hospitals in California through the lens of Leapfrog Safety Grades and discuss the complex interplay of geographical location, hospital size, and larger system affiliation status. Leapfrog Safety Grades, hospital characteristics, and geographic information were collected. Hospitals were categorized by geographic region, size, rural/urban classification, and larger system affiliation status. Of the 284 hospitals included in the study, 95 were given a grade of A, 68 given a grade of B, 93 given a grade of C, 23 given a grade of D, 2 given a grade of F, and 3 were not graded. The vast majority of hospitals in California were classified as urban, with 183 falling under this category. The average number of hospital beds and SD was 227 ± 47.57. On average, hospitals that received a grade of D were significantly smaller in size than those that received a grade of A, while hospitals that received a grade of B or C were similar in size. A total of 107 hospitals were affiliated with a larger health care system. About 70% of hospitals affiliated with a system received an A or B grade, while 50% of unaffiliated hospitals received an A or B grade. Results of this study demonstrate a need for improving health care access and quality in medically underserved urban and rural areas. Hospitals affiliated with a larger health care system received higher grades than unaffiliated hospitals, suggesting that affiliation may also play a role in the implementation and mitigation of factors that contribute to Leapfrog Safety Grades.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"251-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Healthcare Improvement and Innovation in Quality (THINQ) Collaborative is a uniquely designed program that engages undergraduate and postgraduate students to participate in improving health care and addressing important clinical problems. In 9 years, over 120 THINQ Fellows have been trained in quality improvement (QI) frameworks and methodologies focusing on research skills, social justice, leadership development, and problem-solving. Program evaluation has included surveying current and former THINQ Fellows about their experiences with the program and its subsequent impact on their careers. THINQ's research and outreach initiatives have contributed to improvements in workflows and clinical care on topics such as interdisciplinary team communication, discharge and care transition, sepsis management, and physician burnout. The THINQ Program has equipped future health care leaders to engage with and address QI issues in clinical practice. The structures, processes, and outcomes discussed here can guide other institutions in creating similar QI programs.
{"title":"The Healthcare Improvement and Innovation in Quality (THINQ) Collaborative: A Novel Quality Improvement Training Program for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students.","authors":"Dhwani Krishnan, Abhinav Kareddy, Caitlin Chen, Russel Kerbel, Erin Dowling, Wendy Simon, Anna Dermenchyan","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000192","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Healthcare Improvement and Innovation in Quality (THINQ) Collaborative is a uniquely designed program that engages undergraduate and postgraduate students to participate in improving health care and addressing important clinical problems. In 9 years, over 120 THINQ Fellows have been trained in quality improvement (QI) frameworks and methodologies focusing on research skills, social justice, leadership development, and problem-solving. Program evaluation has included surveying current and former THINQ Fellows about their experiences with the program and its subsequent impact on their careers. THINQ's research and outreach initiatives have contributed to improvements in workflows and clinical care on topics such as interdisciplinary team communication, discharge and care transition, sepsis management, and physician burnout. The THINQ Program has equipped future health care leaders to engage with and address QI issues in clinical practice. The structures, processes, and outcomes discussed here can guide other institutions in creating similar QI programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"174-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272136/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-28DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000193
Pal Shah, Atreya Mishra, Claire Larkin, Tiago Soltes, Mladen I Vidovich
The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 expanded veteran's access to community care leading to increased utilization of non-Veterans Affairs (VA) care and prompting concerns about the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of this care model for the VA. This study seeks to explore veterans' attitudes toward ridesharing services as a means of accessing VA-based cardiovascular care. This cross-sectional, quality improvement study utilized a 7-question survey administered to patients in an urban VA Heart Center to assess transportation preferences and opinions on ridesharing. Participants were more likely to support ridesharing if they held a positive opinion of rideshare ( P = 0.024), felt safe utilizing rideshare ( P = 0.025), or were undergoing invasive procedures ( P = 0.007). Distance traveled did not influence support of ridesharing ( P = 0.617). In conclusion, investing in ridesharing for veterans may provide a cost-effective means to improve VA access and continuity of care regardless of distance.
{"title":"Perception of Ridesharing Among Veterans With Cardiovascular Diseases in the Era of the MISSION Act.","authors":"Pal Shah, Atreya Mishra, Claire Larkin, Tiago Soltes, Mladen I Vidovich","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000193","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 expanded veteran's access to community care leading to increased utilization of non-Veterans Affairs (VA) care and prompting concerns about the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of this care model for the VA. This study seeks to explore veterans' attitudes toward ridesharing services as a means of accessing VA-based cardiovascular care. This cross-sectional, quality improvement study utilized a 7-question survey administered to patients in an urban VA Heart Center to assess transportation preferences and opinions on ridesharing. Participants were more likely to support ridesharing if they held a positive opinion of rideshare ( P = 0.024), felt safe utilizing rideshare ( P = 0.025), or were undergoing invasive procedures ( P = 0.007). Distance traveled did not influence support of ridesharing ( P = 0.617). In conclusion, investing in ridesharing for veterans may provide a cost-effective means to improve VA access and continuity of care regardless of distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-26DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000194
Robin Paudel, Sarah Lessard, Camilla Jaekel, Pamela Albrecht, Amir Masoud Forati, Chris Heiderscheit
Regulatory bodies in the United States have implemented quality metrics aimed at improving outcomes for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The current study was a quality improvement (QI) project in a community-based academic center aimed at improving adherence to sepsis quality metrics, time to antibiotic administration, and patient outcomes. Electronic health record systems were utilized to capture sepsis-related data. Regular audits and feedback sessions were conducted to identify areas for improvement, with a focus on the timely administration of antibiotics. Interventions included improving access to antibiotics, transitioning from intravenous piggyback to intravenous push formulations, and providing continuous staff education and training. This multidisciplinary QI initiative led to significant improvements in the mortality index, length of stay index, and direct cost index for patients with sepsis. Targeted multidisciplinary QI interventions resulted in improved quality metrics and patient outcomes.
{"title":"Enhancing Sepsis Outcomes: A 7-Year Multidisciplinary Endeavor.","authors":"Robin Paudel, Sarah Lessard, Camilla Jaekel, Pamela Albrecht, Amir Masoud Forati, Chris Heiderscheit","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000194","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulatory bodies in the United States have implemented quality metrics aimed at improving outcomes for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The current study was a quality improvement (QI) project in a community-based academic center aimed at improving adherence to sepsis quality metrics, time to antibiotic administration, and patient outcomes. Electronic health record systems were utilized to capture sepsis-related data. Regular audits and feedback sessions were conducted to identify areas for improvement, with a focus on the timely administration of antibiotics. Interventions included improving access to antibiotics, transitioning from intravenous piggyback to intravenous push formulations, and providing continuous staff education and training. This multidisciplinary QI initiative led to significant improvements in the mortality index, length of stay index, and direct cost index for patients with sepsis. Targeted multidisciplinary QI interventions resulted in improved quality metrics and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-08DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197
Nabeel Qureshi, Denise D Quigley
The Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Innovations Exchange (IE) was developed to collect and report on innovative approaches to improving health care. The team reviewed 348 IE innovations including patient-reported satisfaction or experience measures. Innovations most often measured overall rating of care (61% of innovations), followed by access (52%) and provider-patient communication (12%). More than half used patient satisfaction surveys (n = 187) rather than patient experience surveys (n = 64). Innovations using patient experience surveys more often measured specific aspects of patient care, for example, access, versus a general overall rating of care. Most innovations using patient experience surveys administered nonvalidated, homegrown surveys, with few using the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality-endorsed, psychometrically-tested CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. The most common study design was postimplementation-only (65%), highlighting that methodological rigor used to assess patient-centeredness in the IE is low. Broad use of patient experience surveys and more rigorous evaluation study designs has increased some over time but is still lacking.
{"title":"Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common.","authors":"Nabeel Qureshi, Denise D Quigley","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Innovations Exchange (IE) was developed to collect and report on innovative approaches to improving health care. The team reviewed 348 IE innovations including patient-reported satisfaction or experience measures. Innovations most often measured overall rating of care (61% of innovations), followed by access (52%) and provider-patient communication (12%). More than half used patient satisfaction surveys (n = 187) rather than patient experience surveys (n = 64). Innovations using patient experience surveys more often measured specific aspects of patient care, for example, access, versus a general overall rating of care. Most innovations using patient experience surveys administered nonvalidated, homegrown surveys, with few using the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality-endorsed, psychometrically-tested CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. The most common study design was postimplementation-only (65%), highlighting that methodological rigor used to assess patient-centeredness in the IE is low. Broad use of patient experience surveys and more rigorous evaluation study designs has increased some over time but is still lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269007/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-26DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000188
Solanus de la Serna, Sruti Prathivadhi-Bhayankaram, Rachel Anderson, Arya Zandvakili, Jonathan Day, Mackenzie Hines, Naomi Vather-Wu, Joseph Salomone, Marcia Zeithamel, Meaghan Meyer, Leslie Brettell, Krista Johnson, Samuel Zetumer, Derek Hupp
{"title":"Optimizing Utilization of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease in a VA Primary Care Clinic: An Interdisciplinary Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Solanus de la Serna, Sruti Prathivadhi-Bhayankaram, Rachel Anderson, Arya Zandvakili, Jonathan Day, Mackenzie Hines, Naomi Vather-Wu, Joseph Salomone, Marcia Zeithamel, Meaghan Meyer, Leslie Brettell, Krista Johnson, Samuel Zetumer, Derek Hupp","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000188","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000188","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"39 4","pages":"199-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141763938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-12DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000196
Thomas Plugge, Amanda Breviu, Katie Lappé, Mariah Sakaeda, Sonja Raaum
The purpose of this study is to inform the curriculum for Entrustable Professional Activity 13 through analysis of fourth year medical student patient safety event assignments. From 2016 to 2021, students were asked to identify a patient safety event and indicate if the event required an incident report. Assignments were reviewed and coded based on Joint Commission incident definitions. Qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate incident report justification. There were 473 student assignments included in the analysis. Assignments reported incidents regarding communication, medical judgment, medication errors, and coordination of care. Students indicated only 18.0% (85/473) would warrant an incident report. Justification for not filing an incident report included lack of harm to the patient or that it was previously reported. Students were able to identify system issues but infrequently felt an incident report was required. Justifications for not filing an incident report suggest a need for a curriculum focused on the value of reporting near misses and hazardous conditions.
{"title":"\"Near Miss\": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medical Student Assignments in Patient Safety.","authors":"Thomas Plugge, Amanda Breviu, Katie Lappé, Mariah Sakaeda, Sonja Raaum","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000196","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to inform the curriculum for Entrustable Professional Activity 13 through analysis of fourth year medical student patient safety event assignments. From 2016 to 2021, students were asked to identify a patient safety event and indicate if the event required an incident report. Assignments were reviewed and coded based on Joint Commission incident definitions. Qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate incident report justification. There were 473 student assignments included in the analysis. Assignments reported incidents regarding communication, medical judgment, medication errors, and coordination of care. Students indicated only 18.0% (85/473) would warrant an incident report. Justification for not filing an incident report included lack of harm to the patient or that it was previously reported. Students were able to identify system issues but infrequently felt an incident report was required. Justifications for not filing an incident report suggest a need for a curriculum focused on the value of reporting near misses and hazardous conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"168-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141592557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000189
Sofi Damjanovska, Shota Watanabe, Daniel B Karb, Michael Kurin, Gerard Isenberg
Inadequate inpatient bowel preparation can lead to repeat procedures, prolonged hospital stays, and increased financial burden. In this quality improvement project, the authors developed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set with precise instructions and anticipatory guidance for inpatient bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The current study is a nonrandomized intervention study. The authors compared 2 groups: an intervention group using a newly developed, consensus-based, standardized EMR bowel preparation order set and a control group using previously existing EMR bowel preparation orders. Bowel preparation outcomes were followed over the course of 16 months. The aim was to improve inpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation, as evaluated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, procedure delays, and length of hospital stay. We additionally evaluated the groups' demographics and patient-level factors. A total of 459 inpatient colonoscopies were evaluated over a 16-month period. The intervention group consisted of 227 inpatient colonoscopies, while the control group consisted of 232. The intervention group showed superior Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score and decreased length of hospital stay. The number of adequate bowel preparations increased in the intervention group when compared to the control group from 77% to 86%. The creation of an EMR-based order set is a low-cost and sustainable action that can be easily implemented throughout a hospital system.
{"title":"Improving Inpatient Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: A Successful Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Sofi Damjanovska, Shota Watanabe, Daniel B Karb, Michael Kurin, Gerard Isenberg","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000189","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadequate inpatient bowel preparation can lead to repeat procedures, prolonged hospital stays, and increased financial burden. In this quality improvement project, the authors developed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set with precise instructions and anticipatory guidance for inpatient bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The current study is a nonrandomized intervention study. The authors compared 2 groups: an intervention group using a newly developed, consensus-based, standardized EMR bowel preparation order set and a control group using previously existing EMR bowel preparation orders. Bowel preparation outcomes were followed over the course of 16 months. The aim was to improve inpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation, as evaluated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, procedure delays, and length of hospital stay. We additionally evaluated the groups' demographics and patient-level factors. A total of 459 inpatient colonoscopies were evaluated over a 16-month period. The intervention group consisted of 227 inpatient colonoscopies, while the control group consisted of 232. The intervention group showed superior Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score and decreased length of hospital stay. The number of adequate bowel preparations increased in the intervention group when compared to the control group from 77% to 86%. The creation of an EMR-based order set is a low-cost and sustainable action that can be easily implemented throughout a hospital system.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141422404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-12DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000195
Bradley V Watts, Kay Calloway
There is a continued need to improve the quality of health care services and the health outcomes associated with that care. Quality improvement model and the Learning Health System framework have emerged as potential methods to achieve the goals of better care and enhanced outcomes. Few practical tools and approaches have been developed to assist with the initiation of quality improvement and development of a Learning Health System. The Department of Veterans Affairs developed and deployed a national system to assist and organize improvement projects and serve as a database for learning. During its first 5 years of use, 7397 quality improvement projects were completed using the electronic tool. National implementation of a structured tool for quality improvement is possible.
{"title":"Implementation of Quality Improvement System in a National Health System.","authors":"Bradley V Watts, Kay Calloway","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000195","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a continued need to improve the quality of health care services and the health outcomes associated with that care. Quality improvement model and the Learning Health System framework have emerged as potential methods to achieve the goals of better care and enhanced outcomes. Few practical tools and approaches have been developed to assist with the initiation of quality improvement and development of a Learning Health System. The Department of Veterans Affairs developed and deployed a national system to assist and organize improvement projects and serve as a database for learning. During its first 5 years of use, 7397 quality improvement projects were completed using the electronic tool. National implementation of a structured tool for quality improvement is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"183-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141592558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-26DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000190
Nicholas Noverati, Sagar Mehta, Megan K Reed, Jillian Zavodnick
{"title":"Understanding Barriers and Assessing Education Intervention on Prescribing Naltrexone for Alcohol Use Disorder.","authors":"Nicholas Noverati, Sagar Mehta, Megan K Reed, Jillian Zavodnick","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000190","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000190","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"39 4","pages":"197-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141763939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}