Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-11DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223
Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Megan Keenan, Hayley Dykhoff, Marie Hall, Kyle Campbell, Emily Cahill, Ryan Hanson, Dustin McEvoy, Wei He, Sayon Dutta, Rachel P Rosovsky, Damon E Houghton
Guidelines for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) start with a risk assessment using a pretest probability (PTP) tool, followed by D-dimer testing or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. The project aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs) to more accurately diagnose PE and to reduce unnecessary CTPAs. To identify a value set to accurately identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using standard classification systems and clinical vocabularies (ie, Current Procedural Terminology [CPT], Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes [LOINC], systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms [SNOMED CT]) across 3 academic United States health care systems. A comprehensive value set to identify CTPAs was selected, which contained 31 codes. Additionally, each health care system had unique, site-specific codes to more granularly identify CTPAs. Three health care systems representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022, and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC. The project evaluated whether a D-dimer was obtained using CPT and LOINC and whether the D-dimer result was elevated using SNOMED CT. The number of ED encounters, PTP use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value for selected codes were calculated. Over a 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were included from 38 EDs. 11,794 ED encounters with CTPAs during the study period, using the site-specific codes were identified. The comprehensive value set had a PPV of 63.4%. Restricting the CTPA value set to CPT code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 improved the PPV to 82% with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. The restricted value set captured the highest proportion of relevant site-specific codes. D-dimer values were identified using LOINC codes 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMED CT codes were not used at any site to identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site, and only one site provided an abnormal flag for D-dimer results. Heterogeneity in the use of nationally standardized codes for labs and imaging tests limits the ability to measure and compare quality across health care organizations for CTPA and D-dimer results. Restricting the identification of CTPA to CPT Code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 resulted in high sensitivity and specificity, but false positives remain. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result is not standardized across institutions. Therefore, the currently available value sets cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing.
{"title":"Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.","authors":"Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Megan Keenan, Hayley Dykhoff, Marie Hall, Kyle Campbell, Emily Cahill, Ryan Hanson, Dustin McEvoy, Wei He, Sayon Dutta, Rachel P Rosovsky, Damon E Houghton","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guidelines for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) start with a risk assessment using a pretest probability (PTP) tool, followed by D-dimer testing or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. The project aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs) to more accurately diagnose PE and to reduce unnecessary CTPAs. To identify a value set to accurately identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using standard classification systems and clinical vocabularies (ie, Current Procedural Terminology [CPT], Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes [LOINC], systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms [SNOMED CT]) across 3 academic United States health care systems. A comprehensive value set to identify CTPAs was selected, which contained 31 codes. Additionally, each health care system had unique, site-specific codes to more granularly identify CTPAs. Three health care systems representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022, and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC. The project evaluated whether a D-dimer was obtained using CPT and LOINC and whether the D-dimer result was elevated using SNOMED CT. The number of ED encounters, PTP use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value for selected codes were calculated. Over a 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were included from 38 EDs. 11,794 ED encounters with CTPAs during the study period, using the site-specific codes were identified. The comprehensive value set had a PPV of 63.4%. Restricting the CTPA value set to CPT code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 improved the PPV to 82% with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. The restricted value set captured the highest proportion of relevant site-specific codes. D-dimer values were identified using LOINC codes 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMED CT codes were not used at any site to identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site, and only one site provided an abnormal flag for D-dimer results. Heterogeneity in the use of nationally standardized codes for labs and imaging tests limits the ability to measure and compare quality across health care organizations for CTPA and D-dimer results. Restricting the identification of CTPA to CPT Code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 resulted in high sensitivity and specificity, but false positives remain. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result is not standardized across institutions. Therefore, the currently available value sets cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143392889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000219
John S Murray, Jeannine Campbell, Stacey Larson
{"title":"Promoting a Culture of Civility in High-Reliability Organizations.","authors":"John S Murray, Jeannine Campbell, Stacey Larson","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000219","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"40 2","pages":"64-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143525781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000224
Richard L Fuller, John S Hughes, Samuel D Young, Robert Fogerty, Sandeep Wadhwa, Dana Casey, Miki Patterson, Yonghong Chen
Ambulatory procedures performed electively in hospital outpatient departments are of increasing complexity and constitute a growing share of total procedure volume. Despite their importance, little is known of the prevalence of complications from routine procedures once patients are discharged. This study utilizes a 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data file for the years 2019-2022 to assess the relative frequency of hospital-based ambulatory procedures and 30-day patient postprocedure emergency room and hospitalization complication rates utilizing the Ambulatory Potentially Preventable Complication (AM-PPC) classification method. AM-PPC is a claims-based method designed to calculate comparative provider rates of complication exclusively for elective ambulatory procedures excluding procedures performed in hospital emergency departments. The authors calculated the mean rate of ambulatory complications by procedure across hospitals and then compared them for variation in hospital-specific procedure complication rates to the mean rate. About 2.1% of patients receiving a procedure performed in a hospital outpatient department had an emergency room or inpatient hospitalization visit within 30 days. Complication event rates varied widely across hospital outpatient departments and within specific procedures. Hip arthroplasty complication rates varied from 0.0% to 7.6% while those for upper genitourinary procedures varied from 1.7% to 14.2%. In conclusion, the complication rate for ambulatory procedures is seen to vary substantially across hospital outpatient departments for well-established, routine procedures. This study provides a baseline of complication rates for ambulatory procedures, which will be essential for future efforts to improve patient safety.
{"title":"Complications of Ambulatory Procedures: Prevalence and Hospital Outpatient Department Variation.","authors":"Richard L Fuller, John S Hughes, Samuel D Young, Robert Fogerty, Sandeep Wadhwa, Dana Casey, Miki Patterson, Yonghong Chen","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000224","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ambulatory procedures performed electively in hospital outpatient departments are of increasing complexity and constitute a growing share of total procedure volume. Despite their importance, little is known of the prevalence of complications from routine procedures once patients are discharged. This study utilizes a 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data file for the years 2019-2022 to assess the relative frequency of hospital-based ambulatory procedures and 30-day patient postprocedure emergency room and hospitalization complication rates utilizing the Ambulatory Potentially Preventable Complication (AM-PPC) classification method. AM-PPC is a claims-based method designed to calculate comparative provider rates of complication exclusively for elective ambulatory procedures excluding procedures performed in hospital emergency departments. The authors calculated the mean rate of ambulatory complications by procedure across hospitals and then compared them for variation in hospital-specific procedure complication rates to the mean rate. About 2.1% of patients receiving a procedure performed in a hospital outpatient department had an emergency room or inpatient hospitalization visit within 30 days. Complication event rates varied widely across hospital outpatient departments and within specific procedures. Hip arthroplasty complication rates varied from 0.0% to 7.6% while those for upper genitourinary procedures varied from 1.7% to 14.2%. In conclusion, the complication rate for ambulatory procedures is seen to vary substantially across hospital outpatient departments for well-established, routine procedures. This study provides a baseline of complication rates for ambulatory procedures, which will be essential for future efforts to improve patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"44-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837955/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143257758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-28DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000220
Tenzin Oshoe, Adam Billig, Darshak Vekaria, Jia Jian Li, Henry Thode, Samita M Heslin
{"title":"Implementation of a Trauma Zone Improves Disposition Times for Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage or Hip Fracture.","authors":"Tenzin Oshoe, Adam Billig, Darshak Vekaria, Jia Jian Li, Henry Thode, Samita M Heslin","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000220","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"40 2","pages":"69-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143525780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000225
Tamara Broughton, Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen, Sandra Sülz
Research on dashboard adoption has focused on technical and design requirements. Evidence on social mechanisms for successful dashboard adoption is scarce. This study examined 2 quality dashboards in a similar organizational context with different outcomes. The research question was: How do social mechanisms influence the adoption of dashboards in practice? This embedded case study within one Dutch hospital in 2 phases: (1) interviews and observations to identify social mechanisms in the end-user's team and (2) expert focus groups to validate identified mechanisms. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically, resulting in the identification of 3 social mechanisms within the team of end-users influencing dashboard adoption: cultivating a supportive team climate, trust, and leadership behavior in end-users' teams. These mechanisms stimulate a learning environment for discussing and improving care quality. They require action from individuals and teams, so dashboards can be used for collective understanding, learning, and improving. Without these social mechanisms, dashboards remain an unadopted "materiality."
{"title":"From Data to Improvement: Social Mechanisms as a Key to Understanding Dashboard Adoption.","authors":"Tamara Broughton, Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen, Sandra Sülz","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000225","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on dashboard adoption has focused on technical and design requirements. Evidence on social mechanisms for successful dashboard adoption is scarce. This study examined 2 quality dashboards in a similar organizational context with different outcomes. The research question was: How do social mechanisms influence the adoption of dashboards in practice? This embedded case study within one Dutch hospital in 2 phases: (1) interviews and observations to identify social mechanisms in the end-user's team and (2) expert focus groups to validate identified mechanisms. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically, resulting in the identification of 3 social mechanisms within the team of end-users influencing dashboard adoption: cultivating a supportive team climate, trust, and leadership behavior in end-users' teams. These mechanisms stimulate a learning environment for discussing and improving care quality. They require action from individuals and teams, so dashboards can be used for collective understanding, learning, and improving. Without these social mechanisms, dashboards remain an unadopted \"materiality.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837957/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143257760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-11DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000216
Jeong Min Kim, Heba Aboshihata, Lee Moldowsky, Stephanie DiGiovanni
{"title":"Six-Year Retrospective Look at the Effects of Institutional Quality Improvement Efforts to Reduce CAUTIs.","authors":"Jeong Min Kim, Heba Aboshihata, Lee Moldowsky, Stephanie DiGiovanni","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000216","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000216","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"67-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143392891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-02-03DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000217
Meagan Elam, Rachel Moyal-Smith, Madison Canfora, Wendy Cohen, Ki-Do Eum, Christopher Fischer, Judy Margo, Marie McCune, Omer Moin, Magdy Selim, Linda Wendell, Sandeep Kumar
Narrow therapeutic time windows and delays in assessing acute ischemic stroke patients limit the access to and effectiveness of reperfusion therapies. A 2-year quality improvement project codesigned and tested a checklist for quicker evaluation of suspected stroke cases in 2 emergency departments (EDs). Utility, feasibility, and implementation barriers were assessed through semistructured interviews. The impact on stroke quality metrics was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate regression models with data from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines registry. Implementing the checklist was significantly associated with higher odds of receiving intravenous thrombolytics within 60 minutes of ED arrival (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-68.7, P = 0.03). Users felt the checklist improved the standardization of stroke care and promoted teamwork, especially in a time of higher staff turnover. An ED-based stroke checklist resulted in timelier stroke care for acute ischemic stroke patients, meriting further testing in larger, more diverse settings.
狭窄的治疗时间窗口和评估急性缺血性卒中患者的延迟限制了再灌注治疗的可及性和有效性。一项为期两年的质量改进项目共同设计并测试了一份检查表,以更快地评估两个急诊科(ed)的疑似中风病例。通过半结构化访谈评估效用、可行性和实施障碍。使用双变量和多变量回归模型分析对卒中质量指标的影响,数据来自美国心脏协会Get with The Guidelines注册表。实施检查表与急诊到达后60分钟内接受静脉溶栓治疗的几率显著相关(优势比:6.4,95%可信区间:1.1-68.7,P = 0.03)。用户认为检查表提高了卒中护理的标准化,促进了团队合作,特别是在员工离职率较高的时期。基于ed的卒中检查表为急性缺血性卒中患者提供了更及时的卒中护理,值得在更大、更多样化的环境中进行进一步的测试。
{"title":"A Checklist to Improve Acute Stroke Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Meagan Elam, Rachel Moyal-Smith, Madison Canfora, Wendy Cohen, Ki-Do Eum, Christopher Fischer, Judy Margo, Marie McCune, Omer Moin, Magdy Selim, Linda Wendell, Sandeep Kumar","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000217","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Narrow therapeutic time windows and delays in assessing acute ischemic stroke patients limit the access to and effectiveness of reperfusion therapies. A 2-year quality improvement project codesigned and tested a checklist for quicker evaluation of suspected stroke cases in 2 emergency departments (EDs). Utility, feasibility, and implementation barriers were assessed through semistructured interviews. The impact on stroke quality metrics was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate regression models with data from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines registry. Implementing the checklist was significantly associated with higher odds of receiving intravenous thrombolytics within 60 minutes of ED arrival (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-68.7, P = 0.03). Users felt the checklist improved the standardization of stroke care and promoted teamwork, especially in a time of higher staff turnover. An ED-based stroke checklist resulted in timelier stroke care for acute ischemic stroke patients, meriting further testing in larger, more diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143082434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-10DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000215
Sourav Podder, Scott Cowan, Scott Koeneman, Elizabeth Pavis, Doo Park, Christine Schleider, Kathleen Shindle, Matthew Bowen, Adam Johnson
Small-bore feeding tubes (SBFT) in vulnerable patients carry a risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax by misplacement into the lung. This institution noted a series of iatrogenic pneumothoraxes caused by the placement of these devices. A resident-led, multidisciplinary team developed a hospital guideline through a consensus-driven process. The guideline mandated SBFT placement by approved "super-users" via the CORTRAK Enteral Access System or via non-CORTRAK Methods, including the 2-step X-ray Method, fluoroscopy, or direct visualization techniques. A "super-user" Program for the CORTRAK Enteral Access System was developed to assure competency and consistency. With the development of the guideline and "super-user" program, the authors observed a decrease in the number of SBFT-related iatrogenic pneumothoraxes. Following a brief period of adoption, the three-hospital organization has had no SBFT-related iatrogenic pneumothoraxes. This project demonstrates the effectiveness of developing a resident-driven, evidence-based hospital guideline for the safe passage of SBFTs.
{"title":"Resident-Driven Guideline to Reduce Iatrogenic Pneumothoraxes From Small-Bore Feeding Tubes: A Quality and Safety Improvement Project.","authors":"Sourav Podder, Scott Cowan, Scott Koeneman, Elizabeth Pavis, Doo Park, Christine Schleider, Kathleen Shindle, Matthew Bowen, Adam Johnson","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000215","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Small-bore feeding tubes (SBFT) in vulnerable patients carry a risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax by misplacement into the lung. This institution noted a series of iatrogenic pneumothoraxes caused by the placement of these devices. A resident-led, multidisciplinary team developed a hospital guideline through a consensus-driven process. The guideline mandated SBFT placement by approved \"super-users\" via the CORTRAK Enteral Access System or via non-CORTRAK Methods, including the 2-step X-ray Method, fluoroscopy, or direct visualization techniques. A \"super-user\" Program for the CORTRAK Enteral Access System was developed to assure competency and consistency. With the development of the guideline and \"super-user\" program, the authors observed a decrease in the number of SBFT-related iatrogenic pneumothoraxes. Following a brief period of adoption, the three-hospital organization has had no SBFT-related iatrogenic pneumothoraxes. This project demonstrates the effectiveness of developing a resident-driven, evidence-based hospital guideline for the safe passage of SBFTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"8-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142960947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-24DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000211
Lauren R Hamilton, Benjamin Hewlett, Sepehr Sajadi, Steve T Flynn, Mayan Bomsztyk, Nazima Allaudeen
{"title":"Leveraging Informative Phone Calls by Student Volunteers to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening Compliance: A Case Study From the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Lauren R Hamilton, Benjamin Hewlett, Sepehr Sajadi, Steve T Flynn, Mayan Bomsztyk, Nazima Allaudeen","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000211","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"40 1","pages":"28-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143030666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-24DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000210
Kimberly Davidow, Emi H Caywood, Takeshi Tsuda, Alison Hong
{"title":"Creating a Pediatric Cardio-Oncology Clinic for Childhood Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Kimberly Davidow, Emi H Caywood, Takeshi Tsuda, Alison Hong","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000210","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":"40 1","pages":"26-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143030663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}